In short
Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Science - "Why We Follow Orders We Know Are Wrong"
Episode Overview In this episode of *The Rest Is Science*, mathematician Professor Hannah Fry and science creator Michael Stevens discuss various scientific inquiries, including heat storage technology, perceptions of dimensions, and the nature of light in gravitational fields. They delve into human behavior, authority influence, and the ethical implications of psychological experiments.
---
Key Topics and Discussions
- Heat Storage Technology
- Question from Listener: Can we store summer's heat to warm our homes in winter?
- Answer: The concept is already realized in the form of a seasonal thermal energy storage system.
- Example: The Drake Landing community in Canada utilizes underground heat batteries to store heat during summer for use in winter.
- Mechanism:
- Solar panels heat a fluid which warms underground rocks.
- In winter, the stored heat is transferred to warm homes.
- Challenges:
- Heat retention is difficult; heat naturally escapes.
- Effective use requires multiple homes to share the system due to the square-cube law.
- Perception of Higher Dimensions
- Listener Inquiry: Will humanity ever build a tool to perceive a fourth dimension?
- Discussion:
- Current simulations can represent four-dimensional objects but primarily in three-dimensional perspectives.
- Fry expresses a desire to see beyond three dimensions, likening the human experience to being "provincial."
- The conversation touches on children’s ability to conceptualize dimensions more flexibly than adults.
- Gravity and Light
- Listener Inquiry: Why does gravity bend light if light has no mass?
- Einstein's Theory:
- Light bends because space itself is curved by gravity, not because light has mass.
- Analogy Used:
- A laser in a rapidly ascending elevator appears to curve downward due to the acceleration mimicking gravity.
- Historical Validation: In 1919, during a solar eclipse, stars behind the sun were visible, confirming Einstein's predictions.
- Authority and Human Behavior
- Experiments Discussed:
- Michael recounts his experiences coordinating psychological experiments to study human behavior under authority.
- Trolley Problem Recreation: Participants often freeze and do nothing when faced with ethical dilemmas, mirroring findings from the Milgram experiments.
- Psychological Experiments and Ethical Dilemmas
- Real-Life Implications:
- Discussion covers how ordinary individuals under pressure tend to follow orders, even against their moral compass.
- Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment is referenced, illustrating how quickly individuals assume roles leading to abusive behavior.
- The Bystander Effect
- Discussion:
- The phenomenon where individuals are less likely to intervene in emergencies when others are present.
- Real-life examples contrasted with laboratory settings illustrate complexities in human behavior and decision-making.
---
Reflective Insights
- Fry and Stevens offer a deep dive into the fragility of human morality when faced with authority, revealing unsettling truths about decision-making in high-pressure situations.
- Listeners are encouraged to consider their own responses to authority and ethical dilemmas, probing the boundaries of personal responsibility versus societal expectation.
---
Conclusion In this episode, Fry and Stevens blend scientific inquiry with philosophical exploration, prompting listeners to challenge their perceptions of reality and question the complexities of human behavior. The integration of personal anecdotes and scientific principles makes for a thought-provoking discussion that resonates with anyone curious about the intersection of science and ethics.
---
For more information on supporting cancer research, visit [Cancer Research UK](https://cancerresearchuk.org/restisscience).
Join us every Thursday for more insights on *The Rest Is Science*.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOScience Mystery Bag: Questions and Curiosities
2:30 to 3:38
Hannah and Michael explore listener questions starting with heat storage.
“I mean, some people call it thoughts, other people call it burdens.”
Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage Explained
3:38 to 7:28
Discussion on seasonal thermal energy storage systems and their effectiveness.
“It seems such a waste to spend energy adding heat to our houses in winter and spending more energy on AC to remove it in summer.”
Exploring Dimensions and the Future of Understanding
7:28 to 10:40
Michael shares thoughts on dimensionality and looking beyond our dimensions.
“Just as long as you don't mind a bit of sand in your water, in your shower.”
Gravity, Light, and Einstein's Theory
10:40 to 14:01
Exploration of why gravity bends light, according to Einstein's theory.
“Everything's perfectly reversed because to them, this and this are the same shape.”
Understanding Einstein's Gravity
14:01 to 17:51
Learn how Einstein's theory of gravity explains light bending and its implications.
“But Einstein's version of gravity is that it's not the light that's bending, it's the space around the light that is bending.”
Predictions and Observations
17:52 to 18:12
Discover the significance of Einstein's predictions and their verification.
“From predicting things that have not been observed before to hearing stories that have not been told before.”
Experiments and Personal Experiences
20:57 to 23:00
Explore the personal experiences of participating in psychological experiments.
“Hannah, have you ever had your mind experimented on by scientists?”
Ethics and the Trolley Problem
23:01 to 28:00
Delve into ethical dilemmas through the lens of the trolley problem experiment.
“When I was in high school, I had a psychology teacher that got me into psychology.”
Fear and Authority in Experiments
28:00 to 29:40
Explore the psychological impact of authority in experiments like the Stanford prison study.
“And to put you in that position was not fair.”
The Ethics of Psychological Experiments
29:40 to 32:40
Discuss the ethical dilemmas faced during a psychological study involving isolation.
“There's a lot of anxiety and fears and also just depression feelings of your life isn't worth it.”
Show all 17 chapters
Rationalizations for Unethical Behavior
32:40 to 35:00
Examine how participants rationalized their involvement in unethical actions.
“And they all confessed that it was for the experiment involving isolation.”
Lessons from Historical Experiments
35:00 to 36:20
Learn about the implications of the Milgram experiment on obedience and authority.
“It was scary for me because I had to be the unethical experimenter.”
The Bystander Effect in Real Life
36:20 to 39:20
Understand the dynamics of the bystander effect through psychological experiments.
“but with sort of financial reward, with like societal expectation, with like systems and norms.”
Cultural Perspectives on Moral Dilemmas
39:20 to 41:30
Analyze how cultural differences influence moral decision-making in dilemmas like the trolley problem.
“I also wonder whether there's like a international dimension to this.”
Inflicted Insights and Ethical Awareness
41:30 to 42:01
Discuss the concept of inflicted insights arising from learning about unethical behavior.
“Like there's always some other option that isn't the simple this person or that person.”
The Power of Inflicted Insights
42:01 to 43:37
Explore the psychological concept of inflicted insight and its implications on personal power and morality.
“What if it's got a million embryos on it?”
Community Engagement and Upcoming Content
43:37 to 43:58
Learn how to engage with the show and what's coming up next for listeners.
“So if you've got any questions that you would like us to answer, you can send them in at the rest is science at goalhanger.com.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hannah Fry:This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. So when most people think of naked mole rats, their unusual relationship to cancer probably isn't the first thing that comes to mind. But maybe it should be because it is incredibly rare for them to develop cancer, which could be partly down to their unique immune system, or it might be the way that their cells respond to damage. So scientists are studying their biology for its cancer-fighting secrets. It's a reminder that discoveries can sometimes come from places you don't expect. Cancer Research UK is the world's largest charitable funder of cancer research.
0:35Hannah Fry:Thousands of scientists of doctors and nurses work across more than 20 countries to help turn discoveries in the lab into new tests, new treatments and new innovations. And the impact is clear. Over the past 50 years, the charity's pioneering work has helped double cancer survival in the UK, meaning more people living longer, better lives free from the fear of cancer. For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, their breakthroughs and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org forward slash rest is science. Score more with the college branded Venmo debit card and earn up to 5 % cash back with Venmo Stash.
1:15Hannah Fry:Got paid back? With the Venmo debit card you can instantly access your balance and spend on what you want like game day snacks, gear, tickets and more. The more you do, the more cash back you can earn. Plus, there's no monthly fee or minimum balance. Sign up now at Venmo.com slash college card. The Venmo MasterCard is issued by the Bancorp Bank N.A. Select schools available. Venmo stash terms and exclusions apply at Venmo.me slash stash terms. Max$100 cash back per month. This episode is brought to you by Focus Features. On March 27th, Focus Features invites you to be a part of the most explosive movie of this year's Sundance and South by Southwest film festivals.
1:52The AI Doc, or How I Became an Apocaloptimist, is being called supremely entertaining and the most urgent movie of our time. The AI Doc, or How I Became an Apocaloptimist, rated PG-13, only in theaters March 27th.
2:15Welcome to The Rest is Science. This is Field Notes, a kind of podcast expedition diary where Hannah and I share some of the thoughts we've been carrying around. Thrilling discoveries and big questions, whatever's been occupying our minds.
2:30Hannah Fry:I mean, some people call it thoughts, other people call it burdens. But every week we're going to do... I call it all I've got. Yeah, I mean, that's fair. We're going to bring something from up from up of our science mystery bag. We're going to we're going to bring something to show each other. It's like a rest of science is its very own version of show and tell. And yeah, this week, it's your turn, Michael. That's right. And so later in the episode, I am going to share a story, actually, a story about the scariest moment for me ever in the minefield psychological experimentation show I did. And it's not what you're expecting.
3:11Hannah Fry:Well, I mean, you were the man who locked himself away for three days and started hallucinating. So if it's scarier than that, then I think the rest of us need to buckle up. As ever, we would also like to hear your questions, your theories, your thought experiments, maybe not your burdens. You can send them in to us and we'll dust off a shelf for you. You can join our vast collection of curiosities. Yeah, we'd love to put you there. So let's begin with Francois, who sent in a question. It seems such a waste to spend energy adding heat to our houses in winter and spending more energy on AC to remove it in summer.
3:46Could we feasibly design a machine that pumps heat into a form of reverse fridge during summer, stores it, and then pumps the heat back into our homes in the winter?
3:55Hannah Fry:I mean, Francois, you have a mind that is a marvel, but unfortunately you've invented something that already exists. because the machine you're describing is called a seasonal thermal energy storage system. And it's essentially, it's like a big battery, but for heat. The problem is if you try and store heat, it leaks quite a lot, right? If you put a cup of tea in a thermos to come back the next morning, it's going to be cold, right? Heat has this habit of like sneaking away. But there are some places where they do this. So there's a particular neighborhood in Canada known as Drake landing where it gets really warm in the summer, but also extremely cold in the winter.
4:39Hannah Fry:I mean, that sort of part of the world has massive variance in summer and winter temperature. And what they did there is they built 52 houses that were all connected to this massive underground storage field. So in the summer, what they do is they have all of these solar panels on their roof and they use that to pump this solution basically down into this massive underground chamber where they have all of these boreholes and they literally heat up the rock that sits down there to about 80 degrees centigrade and then in the winter when it's like freezing cold up top they reverse the process they pump water through these like very warm rocks and use it all to heat up their houses up top.
5:22Hannah Fry:You know, the London Underground is basically a perfect demonstration of the way that the earth itself can hold on to energy in the form of heat. I was going to say, that's impressive that the rock can hold the heat so well. This happens in the underground in London as well? Yeah, because right in the early days when the underground was built, it was like 10-15 degrees and they're the clay the sort of London clay it was actually quite cold down there but after you know 150 years or so of all of these trains moving in and out of tunnels of people of that energy being continually pushed in it sort of saturated the heat capacity of the clay itself the clay cannot take on any more heat effectively so all of the heat just continues to be down there it can be 40 degrees down there in winter you you actually get more people fainting in the underground during winter than in summer when it is also insufferably hot but in winter people are also wearing all of these like coats and things so the earth itself is actually very capable of of like holding on to working as this this heat battery um it works really well in this place in in uh in canada there's a there's another example a finnish company who've done this as well they're using sand instead this massive silo filled with sand and they sort of heat the sand up to this crazy numbers like sort of 500 degrees c um using renewable energy in the summer and then blow air through it in the winter to to give them heat back the only problem with this is that um if you wanted to like install one of these batteries yourself if you want to say okay you know what i can dig down however many i could dig a kilometer her down under my own house and have my own little battery that's what i think i know i know that's what you're thinking the slight problem with this is that i mean there's it's the the the square cube law is going on here right which is this um actually the surface area to volume ratio needs to be you basically need to do it for a lot of houses simultaneously for for the heat to not to escape you need like 50 houses at once but if you know if francois you happen to be a housing developer who wants to heavily invest in minimizing energy bills for the future of your potential homeowners, then I mean, this is a great way to do it.
7:44Hannah Fry:Just as long as you don't mind a bit of sand in your water, in your shower. Or your air. Or your air. Exactly. Ah, turn on the dust storm. I'm getting chilly.
7:58Hannah Fry:okay next question we had one question come in from a guy from slovenia in fact he said do you think there will ever be a tool an invention that humanity creates which would let us gaze into a different dimension oh wow i love this question because it's um i i hope so much that before I leave this earth, I get to look in a direction that isn't one of the three I was born into. So boring looking in the same three directions the entire time. I know. I think that there's so much more out there. I feel like Belle from Beauty and the Beast. I'm just this provincial 3D blob. And I desperately want to not look up, down, left, right, forward, backward, but I want to look on a kata.
8:42And I think that, you know, things like, oh, we'll look in a history book, then you're, you know, looking through time, a fourth dimension. I'm like, no, I want it to be spatial. And I think that the closest we are is unsatisfying. We can see the results, for example, of dimensional change. Look in a mirror. And every time you look in a mirror, you are looking at yourself as you would appear if you had been rotated in a fourth dimension through a fourth dimension. You can think about this as like an L shape. If this is stuck in a plane and it's moving around, it can never become this unless it gets rotated in a third dimension outside of the plane.
9:26And if we do that to our bodies, we wind up just like this getting mirror reversed. So when I see my mirror image, I'm seeing what I would look like if someone from a fourth dimension grabbed me and rotated me out beyond these three dimensions that I live in. We have a lot of computer simulations that can simulate four dimensional objects, right? There are a lot of amazing games that allow you to do this, but they only show you three dimensions. And then the object like leaves for a little while or part of it leaves and comes back in and you go, Oh, it was transformed in more dimensions than I can perceive.
10:03Interesting. But it's not just the effects that I want. It's the, um, the actual direction. And I feel like it's too late for me. I think that children might be able, if we catch them early enough, they might be able to see, I think they're the tool because they haven't been ingrained into the three dimensions yet. Like, you know how, if you look at kids, they'll, they'll sometimes when they're learning to, form letters. They'll write words backwards and mirror reversed. It looks like an amazing feat that would be hard for me to do as an adult. And they're just like, oh, yep. And they write their name.
10:42Everything's perfectly reversed because to them, this and this are the same shape. Like they, they understand what is the same between anatiomorphs, between mirror image pairs. And we unlearn that as we become more familiar with the universe that we live in. I do have somewhere a four-dimensional Rubik's Cube. Let me see if I can find it. I don't think I've put on my wall yet. Let me look in the chill room, which maybe I'll show you guys one of these days. Chill isn't cold or chill isn't cool?
11:18Both. I'm so sorry. I don't know where the heck it is. It doesn't matter because I forget which kind of moves are allowed on it. So I would just make a fool of myself. But if you, if you, if you look up four dimensional Rubik's cube, Melinda green, a long time ago made an interactive website where you can solve a four dimensional Rubik's cube. It can be rotated in the three dimensions we're used to, but also this fourth one that kind of turns it inside out. And it's phenomenal. And she's actually invented a physical version. And I've been talking to her about like, how do we make more of these?
11:55And what would you do if you had, you know, more resources? And she's like, ah, I would put lines on them to represent the like geodesics. And I'm very excited for it.
12:06Hannah Fry:That sounds really cool. I mean, impossible, but really cool. I do like the idea there of just getting a child as young as possible and then just being to them like demanding to point where the fourth dimension is because they're the only ones who can possibly know. exactly they're the only ones and from there maybe um guy we could invent a tool to actually see it for ourselves what if though what if we are like bell and uh actually once we do get to the fourth or other dimensions all that's to be found is beasts um but they won't really be beasts but there will be gastons who are afraid of that knowledge that new vista that's been opened and they will say, kill the beast, kill the fourth dimension, build walls to block it.
12:53And they may be right, but should they be right?
12:58Hannah Fry:The thing is, Michael, I think Beauty and the Beast was originally written as a little story that you would tell young, very young girls who are about to be married off to scary old rich men. To make them okay with it. It's like you think he's a beast because he is, but... Maybe if you put in a lot of work, you can fix him. Well, look, the fourth dimension is my old rich man. And I am jumping into this relationship with both feet. Okay. Yeah. Give me the candlestick. I'm a teapot and off we go. Okay. Amazing. Let's move on to a question from Henry. Why does gravity bend light if light has no mass?
13:47Hannah Fry:It's a great question, isn't it? It's a great question. And the thing is, is that that doesn't make any sense if you stick to Newton's idea of what light is, of what gravity is, sorry, that it's like it's something that acts on mass. But Einstein's version of gravity is that it's not the light that's bending, it's the space around the light that is bending. And that is why it appears to bend. It's not that it's like having a gravitational pull or gravitational effect. And I know that actually we did this whole episode on gravity and we talked about there's sort of slight problems with imagining it as though it's a bowling ball on a rubber sheet, which is the one that sort of people talk about quite a lot.
14:28Hannah Fry:But there's a slightly simpler way to think about this, I think. Imagine if you're standing in like in an elevator in a lift and you've got a laser and you're sort of pointing the laser over at the other side, hitting the wall directly opposite the elevator. And then all of a sudden there's like a rocket engine under the elevator that blasts off, accelerating the elevator up extremely fast. Now, the thing is, is that while the floor is rushing up, while the light is travelling across the room, the floor underneath it is rushing upwards so quickly that it means that by the time the light hits the wall, the wall will have moved up so to you standing on the inside of the elevator it looks like the laser beam is curving downwards because you're moving up incredibly fast and what Einstein realized essentially that's like the bending of the light as it were and what Einstein realized is that the acceleration feels exactly the same as gravity there's those two things that the feeling of them as it were is sort of indistinguishable if you if you wake up in a windowless box and you feel heavy you don't know whether you're on earth or whether you're you're in a rocket that's accelerating at 1g and so if acceleration can bend light then gravity must also bend light and the proof of this came in um like the really remarkable proof was of einstein's ideas came in 1919 it was a big eclipse for years it was just this cool theory right but then this total solar eclipse happened and astronomers, in 1919, went to the site of the eclipse and they looked at stars that were directly behind the sun.
16:08Hannah Fry:Now, if light didn't bend, then during the total eclipse, you shouldn't be able to see them, right? You'd have to wait for different moments in the year, different times to be able to see those stars. But because the sun's gravity bends the light from those stars around during the total solar eclipse those stars appeared next to the sun and that the position of them the position of those stars was shifted by exactly the amount that einstein had predicted so i and and that experiment that was what really made einstein this this celebrity overnight superstar superstar yeah he proved that light It doesn't need mass to be pushed around.
16:48Hannah Fry:It just needs this road that it follows. Yeah, the space-time that it travels through is being curved. And the light is just traveling in the geodesic, the straight-line path. And whoops, it happens to be curved. Guess I went around the sun into your eyeball. Peek-a-boo. This is really why Einstein has the reputation that he does. This is why everyone is still, you know, 100 and whatever years later, still so completely flawed by the unimaginable foresight of this man. Like to be able to sit in a room and have a thought experiment like that elevator and conclude from it that during a total eclipse, you should still be able to see the stars that are hiding behind the sun and then ending up being correct.
17:34I mean, that really is just phenomenal.
17:39Hannah Fry:I mean, that's the dream. Your ideas are testable. They are tested in your lifetime. And you were right. You predicted things we had not observed before. Absolutely. Well, okay. From predicting things that have not been observed before to hearing stories that have not been told before. Join us back after the break.
18:12This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. Cancer drugs aren't developed overnight. They start as ideas in the lab, then move into testing to check they're safe and work effectively.
18:23Hannah Fry:In the late 1990s, Cancer Research UK scientists began exploring a bold idea. Could the antibodies that normally trigger allergic reactions be used to treat cancer? The lab results were promising, but allergic reactions carry real risks. After years of work, an early stage trial showed these antibodies could be used safely. And for one person on the trial, their tumour shrank. Research is ongoing, but this careful process is how treatments move from the lab into hospitals. Cancer Research UK backs innovative ideas. And thanks to decades of support, over 8 in 10 people in the UK receiving cancer drugs are using one developed by or with Cancer Research UK scientists.
19:06For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs, and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org forward slash the rest is science.
19:18Hannah Fry:Eczema is unpredictable, but you can flare less with EpGliss, a once-monthly treatment for moderate to severe eczema. After an initial four-month or longer dosing phase, about four in ten people taking EpGliss achieved itch relief and clear or almost clear skin at 16 weeks. And most of those people maintain skin that's still more clear at one year with monthly dosing.
20:04if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with EpGliss. Before starting EpGliss, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection.
20:11Hannah Fry:Ask your doctor about EpGliss and visit epgliss.lily.com or call 1-800-LILY-RX or 1-800-545-5979. So good, so good, so good. Spring styles are at Nordstrom Rack stores now and they're up to 60 % off. Stock up and save on Rag & Bone, Madewell, Vince, All Saints, and more of your favorites. How did I not know Rack has Adidas? Why do we rock? for the hottest deal. Just so many good brands. Join the Nordy Club to unlock exclusive discounts, shop new arrivals first, and more. Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite rack store for free. Great brands, great prices. That's why you rack.
20:55All right, welcome back. Hannah, have you ever had your mind experimented on by scientists? Not knowingly. Well, good. One of these days I'd like to do some on your brain, but today I want to talk about the scariest experiments I've been a part of. I did this a lot in college for money. Did you? You could go in and make a few bucks by taking a survey, or you could make dozens of bucks by having them do an MRI scan on you.
21:25Hannah Fry:Are you one of the weird people that they talk about? The idea that psychology experiments are largely done on a particular type of person. Exactly. They're done by college undergrads who want five bucks to get a Big Mac, you know? And so, yeah, I was one of those people that like the foundations of psychology are built on and continue to be built on. And I remember one time I did this MRI study and while they calibrated the machine, they had me watch a movie and I could pick a movie. And it was clear that they had three movies to choose from. One was for women, one was for men, and one was for children.
22:05And the movie for children was Air Bud. And I'd never seen Air Bud. So I'm like, yeah, I'll do Air Bud. So I'm watching Air Bud in this MRI machine while they calibrate the magnets to my brain. and the amount of time it took for them to calibrate the machine was the amount of time it takes for the kid in the movie to realize the dog can play basketball. So I got to watch everything but the dog play basketball. And I was so upset. It wasn't worth the 50 bucks I got paid. And I'm still mad about it. I still haven't seen Air Bud.
22:35Hannah Fry:Did they not give you the option to continue the film? No, they were like, all right, now the experiment must commence. And I had to like recognize patterns and stuff. And I'm like, please put the dog back on the screen. Now I've seen clips of the dog playing basketball and I did a whole episode about whether or not a dog could play basketball according to the rules of the state that the movie appears in. I won't spoil it, but the conclusions were quite surprising. Anyway, psychological experiments is what we're talking about. When I was in high school, I had a psychology teacher that got me into psychology.
23:08It's why I studied psychology in college. But all he really did is play us videos. He played candid camera clips and then would talk about the psychology that was part of the prank we were watching. You know, candid camera is a TV show where people get pranked. Pranks are a big thing on the Internet now, and they can be amusing. They can sometimes be cruel, but often, almost all the time, you're learning a lot about how humans behave and how we think. So I envisioned doing a prank show that was actually psychological experiments because so many experiments on human psychology are basically tricking people into thinking one thing and seeing what they do.
23:54And so in minefield, we did a lot of experiments that were, you know, pretty, pretty intense. We actually recreated the trolley problem. right we developed this intense ruse where people thought they were coming in to review these new high-speed rail car interiors right is the fabric soft or the colors good is the lighting good but then there was a delay and they had to go and wait in this air-conditioned room because it was a hot day there was a switching room and this old man that we hired who used to switch railroad cars like teaches them yeah i have to switch the lines because these guys are coming to work on it and whatever he shows them and he's an affable guy and they they get to do it themselves while they wait and then he has to leave the room and boom the trolley problem happens and the trolley problem
Read the full transcript
24:40Hannah Fry:being the idea that uh the question normally theoretical but apparently not in your case of whether you uh there is a trolley careering down a track and is set on a on a path where it's going to kill five people or whatever it might be. And you have the choice to pull a lever to redirect the trolley, the train, as it were, so that it only kills one. The question is, do you do it? Yeah. So, so what would you do? So it's really, I mean, the whole point of this, this like theoretical thought experiment was to demonstrate how sometimes there isn't a clear answer to an ethical question because if you take the the utilitarian approach right which is like count up how many lives are saved then then you say well obviously you should pull the lever you know there's five people on on if you do nothing and then there's one person if you if you pull the lever but then i mean then there's also like the sort of value ethics the value-based ethics which says okay but the the murder you are effectively murdering somebody because it's your intervention which is choosing somebody's death, you're choosing to intervene in a situation and the person's death is a direct consequence of that.
25:52Hannah Fry:I personally, I don't know what I would do in that situation. I think I would really, I think I would struggle to pull the lever if I'm honest. Yeah. It's a struggle because yes, if I pull the lever, then only one person dies, not five, but they died because of my action. I feel a lot more responsibility over it. I've got to talk to that person's family and say, yeah, they would have been okay if I hadn't done it. I did save five people, but what had never been done was testing it in real life. If you actually put people in that position. So there were CCTV cameras broadcast all over this switch room.
26:30So you could see the tracks and you could see that a worker went on to the sidetrack while five were working on the regular track and the authority figure, right? The guy who's employed to switch the tracks has left and these alarms start going off like person on track, train approaching, train approaching. What do you do? And as it turns out, people don't do anything. They freeze. There's there's fight or flight, but there's also freeze. And that is the most common behavior that we saw. Now, we had to have an actual psychiatrist on set to debrief people to tell them everyone's OK. This was all not real.
27:09And the decision you made is not something that should bother you. You know, you really helped science today because people were really broken up about the fact that they did nothing. And we needed to make sure and we followed up with them a couple of weeks afterwards because you don't want to traumatize people into thinking I'm the kind of person who wouldn't pull the lever. I allowed five people to be killed instead of one. So it's a really serious thing. But that's it. You're learning. You are learning something about yourself. You're learning something about yourself. And so we we had to sit down and tell every person afterwards, you know, first of all, obviously, everyone's fine.
27:46Those are all actors. You were watching pre-recorded segments where no one was in danger. But the decision that you made is is the right one. You know, there is no decision that is fair. And to put you in that position was not fair. So you shouldn't leave thinking, oh, I did the wrong thing. But that wasn't the scariest episode for me because I just got to watch people do it. For me, the most fear I felt, it wasn't when I went to Peru and drank ayahuasca with a shaman in the middle of the rainforest. It was a experiment we did in partnership with Philip Zimbardo, the guy who was behind the Stanford prison experiment, where a bunch of college students were taken in during the summer.
28:33and some were assigned to be guards and some were assigned to be prisoners. And they started treating each other so badly, like physically, abusively, that he had to end the experiment. And he was like, holy cow, if you give people authority and no oversight, they just abuse it. It's a famous experiment, which we did a whole episode on. But we also did one on how to make a hero. And we wanted to test if people would truly become a whistleblower. If we put people in a situation where something was being done that was wrong and it was up to them to stop it, would they? If you ask in a survey, 95 % of people say, of course, I would come forward.
29:11But in real life, it's a lot more complicated. And so we rented out a wing of a psychology department at a university in Los Angeles and posed as real experimenters. And we were bringing in people to place phone calls to get us subjects for the experiments. And we told them, you know, we're looking at isolation. We're going to put people in isolation for 10 days. Now in the show, I had done three days and that is around the maximum where someone starts to lose their grip on reality. There's a lot of anxiety and fears and also just depression feelings of your life isn't worth it. And we told this to these recruiters and we said, yeah, it's really dangerous.
29:57You know, here's a list of all the things that could go wrong and all of the like mental problems that could be caused by it. But it's important for science that we do this. And during the informative sessions, like half of the people in that room were Confederates who worked for us. And that was for part later in the experiment. I also receive a phone call at some point during the orientation where I'm told that the experiment has not been approved by the university's ethical review board and that it cannot continue.
30:33Hannah Fry:So at this point, then the people who you are, who are on candid camera effectively, they, they know that this is not good. And not only that is not approved. It's not approved. And they overhear this conversation because part of it's on speakerphone and then I switch it. And then I say, look, you know, I'll deal with this later. Like we need to, we need to start doing this now. And every single person agreed to go ahead and phone bank for me to get recruits. And we had them call actors who were trained to ask, like, is this safe? And the recruiters just like, they worked for me. They lied and they said, oh yeah, no, this is really safe and you're going to be fine and it's going to be like a vacation.
31:20Hannah Fry:And they actually lied or they can see, I mean, were they like, I guess there's like a spectrum of lying, right? Like were they just sort of concealing and saying they didn't know or were they actually lying? Most of them didn't directly lie. There were some who were almost happy to say, yep, this is like probably even good for you. Others, they lied in really interesting ways where they would say, they would be asked, what are the risks involved? And they would say, well, there's nothing toxic. There's no electric shocks. They just mentioned true things that weren't a problem to avoid mentioning the actual known problems of forced isolation.
32:02And we then had our Confederates come in and say, hey, I'm starting to feel bad about this. I don't think we should be doing this. to give the real participants an opportunity to say, yeah, I'm leaving or I'm going to make a phone call. Right. And this was all filmed on hidden cameras.
32:21Hannah Fry:How many of them did? How many of them said that they wanted out? None. Still, no one, no one said anything. They just said, well, you know, it's what we're hired to do, basically. And then we had a woman come in to the rooms where they were the cubicles where they were doing the phone calls, who said she was from the Ethical Review Board and wanted to know what they were calling about. And they all confessed that it was for the experiment involving isolation. And we did this for two days and only one person agreed to go on record accusing me of violating the Ethic Review Board's decision. Everyone admitted that they were doing it and that it was wrong and that they felt bad doing it.
33:07but they just wanted to not be a part of it. First of all, there's a million things going on here. Was it loyalty to me? Was it dedication to the job they were hired for? The most common rationalization was that it was important for science that we do this. And that was also what Stanley Milgram heard the most from his participants when he, many decades ago, asked people to administer electric shocks to participants that weren't real, but they thought were real. When asked, why did you go ahead and do what the experimenter said and shock people so badly? They said, well, it was for science. It was for learning.
33:46It was worth it.
33:48Hannah Fry:I mean, the background of that Stanley Milgram experiment is darker still. It was after the Nuremberg trials when Nazis were accused of participating in this horrific moment in history of participating in the deaths of millions of people. And people's defense was, well, I was just doing my job. And the Milgram experiments were to say, you know, how far will people go? How far will people harm each other if they're told to do so by somebody in a white coat and a clipboard? And it turns out very far. They'll go very far, even for something as simple as like a minimum wage phone banking job to recruit test subjects.
34:29It's almost like it's hardwired into us to be loyal to the job and do what we are told by authority. And in a lot of ways, I think the guilt can be diffused onto the system that's asking you to do it. Look, I'm just a small part in this. Like, it's not really up to me. I don't want to lose my job. I don't want to get in trouble from my employer. So I'll just go ahead and tell people there are no known risks. and everyone did it. It was scary for me because I had to be the unethical experimenter. I had to answer the recruiter's questions when they said, well, when are you going to tell people that this is dangerous?
35:15And I'm like, oh, we'll debrief them afterwards on the known risks. Afterwards, and I had to pretend like this didn't bother me. and I want to be liked. I think it's part of being a YouTuber. I just am a people pleaser. And I really, really had a hard time psychologically with two days of being evil, but then having no pushback. Only one person ever pushed back and never to me. They told the authority figure, my boss, who showed up, they told her. yeah, he shouldn't be doing this. And yes, one person said, I will go on record and say that I did this and that I was told to do this.
36:02Hannah Fry:It does. I wonder whether we should do a whole episode on that Milgram experiment and talking about the sort of tendency of humans in more detail, because I think that the research on it is absolutely fascinating. And it feels quite dark in a lot of ways that actually once you have that intersection of moral responsibility, but with sort of financial reward, with like societal expectation, with like systems and norms. Actually, we really do struggle to buck the trend and stand up. I mean, it reminds me quite a bit of the bystander effect. Yes. Which is this idea. I mean, it's not quite as bad as I think the first sort of tellings of the bystander effect made it sound really horrific.
36:49Hannah Fry:There's like this paper in the 1960s that says somebody was stabbed to death in New York and 38 people saw it and nobody did anything. Kitty Genovese. Yeah, a real murder with witnesses all around and not a single person called the police or intervened. But I think over time, actually, that idea of 38 people watching on was a little bit of an exaggeration. And I think that a couple of people had actually called the police. It was a bit of an exaggeration by journalists. But you do see this bystander effect in the psychological experiments that you're describing where you get people, in particular when you have smoke filling in a room and actors that are not reacting.
37:31Hannah Fry:People sort of assume that it's not really their problem. Or you have some students who are sort of sitting in a room and over an intercom they hear the sound of somebody else having a seizure or crying for help or something and very, very few people will intervene. but it's sort of like people can reason, reason that this isn't their problem, that there's somebody else who will step in and fix it. Yeah. The seizure one, I remember an experiment where people were doing some task that was obviously just a filler task over headphones. Everyone was in their own little cubicle and they heard the people they were working with over headphones.
38:08And in one condition, there were like four people all listening together and talking together. And then the other people were alone with just them and one other person. And if the other person they're listening to faked having a seizure or a heart attack, the other person listening immediately got up and went for help. But if there were, if they believe there were four people on this line and one of them had a heart attack, they would just keep sitting there for a while because surely someone else is going to do something.
38:41Hannah Fry:Right. The thing is, is that, I mean, in these experiments that sort of, because it's a lab setting, because it's sort of a constructed setting, when you watch back videos of genuine disasters, right? So, so real emergency situations, kind of real high stakes scenarios. Actually, I mean, you often do see people who step up. And I think that the original idea of the bystander effect is that the more people that there are, like on your phone call, the more people there are the less it's my problem to do something whereas i think in situations where you have i don't know like a someone wielding a knife for instance actually the more people that there are the more likely it is that people will step in and and try to mount a response it's much less scary when you feel as though there's sort of safety and numbers so it's maybe not quite as depressing as sometimes um the telling of this but there is still something in there though right of like personal responsibility versus collective responsibility.
39:36Hannah Fry:I also wonder whether there's like a international dimension to this. The trolley problem that you described right at the beginning, one of the most fascinating experiments that I've seen done on the trolley problem was in the early excitement about driverless cars, maybe around 2018 or so. There was a group of scientists who set up an online game where you could go and play the trolley problem with a driverless car, but it would give you lots of different options. So your driverless car could run over five people or one person, the traditional version, or it could run over a couple or an old granny or a cat or a mum and a baby and so on and so on and so on and would present you with these problems.
40:14Hannah Fry:And what was completely fascinating about that was the breakdown of how different cultures valued different things, how some cultures, particularly in Japan, really cared a lot about older people, would sort of would prioritize them right at the top. Whereas other cultures, Western cultures, for instance, you know, cared about children much more. Everyone cares about cats. That's, I think, the other thing that came on. bit. But we should definitely do some episodes digging more into your psychology past. Well, yeah, because there are just so many factors. Yeah. People in groups can be better, but they can also be worse than they are alone.
40:54And what factors cause it to go one way or the other? We're still learning about. And we also still have open questions about the hypotheticals themselves. How valid are they? Because in a lab setting, it's very different than real life. Um, if you're programming a autopilot car, uh, to, you know, favor young couples with a baby over old people, um, is that really a real choice in real life? Because in real life, what the car will do is it will stop itself. It will drive off the road. It'll crash itself into a wall. Like there's always some other option that isn't the simple this person or that person.
41:36Hannah Fry:I always thought it was really interesting how if you're following the trolley problem logic, you want the car to crash itself rather than crash into people. But who's going to buy a car? Who will buy a car that will crash and potentially hurt the people driving it rather than other people instead? Exactly. Yeah. Yeah, we haven't talked about the train. What's it carrying? What if it's got 12 people on it? What if it's got a million embryos on it? actually immy one of our producers she's uh she's just pointing out that there's this this idea of inflicted insights that you know the the idea that there's there's there's trauma to learning something about yourself that you can't unknow and that psychologists really started to discuss this a lot after the milgram experiment inflicted insight what a great phrase yeah we we encountered that so often in minefield and i encountered it personally like the reason i disliked how to make a hero was that I learned how easy it was to get away with bad stuff.
42:38Right. I think we live our lives thinking, oh, I couldn't do that. I'll get caught. But then here I am literally being an evil, manipulative scientist and everyone's just eating it out of my hand.
42:50Hannah Fry:Like, yeah, of course. It's interesting, the idea that being powerful and evil made you feel uncomfortable. Sometimes I do this thing where I'll like have a day or two where I will deliberately not get out of the way of anybody when I'm walking down the road. Hannah. Have you ever tried this? No, I'm not a sociopath. Like go down Oxford Street or something like a really, really busy, busy road and just like, I'm not getting out of the way. And everybody does move around you. It's like you feel so powerful and so evil and I can't keep it up. But it's fun to do for like a moment. And then, you know, I think it's probably a good lesson that, yeah, we are a lot more powerful than we think and allow ourselves to be.
43:31maybe for good reason, but it's fragile that the barrier between the two.
43:35Hannah Fry:Well, there you go. We've we've learned about some of the scariest things on the planet there then, Michael, which is ourselves. So if you've got any questions that you would like us to answer, you can send them in at the rest is science at goalhanger.com. And you can join our newsletter at the rest is dot com slash science. We are going to be back next Thursday with another edition of Field Notes. and on Tuesday with our normal episode. Until then, stay curious. Bye-bye.
44:14Thought sweet green was just salads? Think again. There's a new way to do sweet green. Wrapped and ready. These handheld wraps pack bold flavor and 40 plus grams of protein into something hearty, satisfying, and built for life on the go. From craveable sauces to satisfying textures, they're designed to keep you going without slowing you down. So put that fork down. Try the new wraps today in app or at order.sweetgreen.com. Available at participating locations only.
44:57Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great. Burnout Paradise is hailed as the wildest night out in New York City by Time Out New York. Now off-Broadway at the Astor Place Theatre, it's a live show you'll never forget, as the people on stage make a desperate attempt to complete a series of escalating tasks, all while running on treadmills. And if they don't complete their to-do list in one hour's time, you can get your money back.
45:38Get tickets today at burnoutparadise.com.
From the publisher
Can we store summer’s heat to warm our homes in winter? Could humans perceive a fourth dimension? And why does light bend around gravity even though it has no mass?
Small questions from YOU which open doors to enormous worlds.
In this episode of Field Notes, Hannah Fry and Michael Stevens discuss underground heat batteries in Canada and Einstein’s thought experiments, from how the universe hides its secrets and how we uncover them.
Later, Michael presents a story which leads to an exploration of human behaviour, the experiments that reveal how authority influences our actions and why ordinary people can be pushed to act against what they say their values really are.
Welcome to The Rest Is Science: Field Notes. Every Thursday, Hannah and Michael share the science behind the world around us from the surprising to the unsettling and show how it shapes both the universe and ourselves.
-------------------
For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs and how you can support them, visit https://cancerresearchuk.org/restisscience
Cancer Research UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1089464), Scotland (SC041666), the Isle of Man (1103) and Jersey (247). A company limited by guarantee. Registered company in England and Wales (4325234) and the Isle of Man (5713F). Registered address: 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ.
-------------------
Find The Rest Is Science all over the internet by clicking here.
-------------------
Video Producer: Adam Thornton + Oli Oakley
Video & Social: Bex Tyrrell
Assistant Producer: Imee Marriott
Producer: Becki Hills
Senior Producer: Lauren Armstrong-Carter
Head Of Digital: Samuel Oakley
Exec Producer: Neil Fearn
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
