America the extreme

16 Jun 2025 · 25 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Today, Explained - America the Extreme

Episode Overview Title: America the Extreme Description: This episode explores the shocking acts of political violence, a military parade in Washington D.C., and widespread political protests across the United States.

Production Team:

  • Produced by: Victoria Chamberlin
  • Edited by: Miranda Kennedy
  • Fact-Checked by: Laura Bullard
  • Engineered by: Patrick Boyd and Matthew Billy
  • Hosted by: Noel King

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Weekend Events Context
  2. Political Climate: The U.S. braced for potential conflict over the weekend with President Trump's birthday coinciding with a military parade.
  3. Notable Protests: Protests dubbed "No King" were scheduled in numerous cities, contributing to heightened tension.
  1. Violence in Minnesota
  2. Incident Overview: A gunman dressed as a police officer shot four individuals in Minnesota, resulting in two deaths. This was labeled a targeted assassination by Governor Tim Walz.
  3. Discussion on Political Violence:
  4. John Lewis from George Washington University's Program on Extremism discusses how the attack fits the definition of political violence.
  5. He emphasizes a concerning trend of increasing political violence across the U.S., highlighting recent high-profile attacks.
  1. Statistical Insights on Political Violence
  2. Rising Trends:
  3. Data indicates a significant increase in domestic terrorist acts and threats against public officials.
  4. The normalization of violent rhetoric in politics is cited as a catalyst for this rise.
  1. The Role of Ideology
  2. Far-Right Extremism: The discussion suggests that the majority of recent violent acts can be traced back to far-right ideologies.
  3. Conspiracy Theories' Impact: The efficacy of conspiracy theories in mobilizing violence and creating a divisive 'us vs. them' narrative is underscored.
  1. Political Rhetoric and Its Effects
  2. Trump's Language: President Trump's messaging is linked to an increase in violent actions and rhetoric, echoing language used by extremist groups.
  3. Social Media's Role: The proliferation of incendiary content on social media amplifies these messages and contributes to public fears of violence.
  1. Historical Perspective on Political Violence
  2. Comparison to Previous Eras: While spikes in political violence are not unprecedented, the current environment is seen as unique due to social media's pervasive influence.
  1. Cultural Reflections at the Military Parade
  2. Trump's Military Parade: The episode also covers a military parade held for the Army's birthday, which was criticized by some attendees for being overly politicized.
  3. Diverse Perspectives: Various attendees expressed differing views on military celebration, showcasing the societal divide regarding military appreciation and its implications for civil-military relations.
  1. Recommendations for Addressing Violence
  2. Call for Action: John Lewis emphasizes the need for political leaders to address and curb the rising tide of political violence, stressing the responsibility of elected officials from all sides.

Key Takeaways

  • The weekend was marked by significant political tension, culminating in violence in Minnesota, raising questions about the nature and rise of political violence in the U.S.
  • There is a notable trend of increasing political violence connected to far-right ideologies, exacerbated by incendiary political rhetoric and social media.
  • The military's role in American society is complex and evolving, with attitudes towards military engagement and appreciation reflecting broader societal divides.
  • Addressing the root causes of political violence requires a concerted effort from political leaders and society at large.

Conclusion This episode of Today, Explained provides a sobering examination of the current political climate in the U.S., highlighting the alarming rise in political violence and the implications of political rhetoric in shaping societal responses. The discussion underscores the urgent need for comprehensive dialogue and action to address these challenges.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00The U.S. entered into the weekend bracing for conflict. President Trump was celebrating his birthday with a military parade that had people on edge. No King's protests were scheduled in hundreds of cities, had people on edge. L.A., unresolved with Marines still on the ground, had people on edge. The shocker was so much of what was feared didn't come to pass, except in Minnesota. A moment in this country where we watched violence erupt. This cannot be the norm. It cannot be the way that we deal with our political differences. A gunman dressed as a police officer shot four people, killing two of them, in what the governor called a targeted assassination of Minnesota state lawmakers.

0:44Vance Bolter was caught last night. These were 72 hours that had Americans asking, what the hell is going on? And we're going to do our best to answer that on Today Explained.

1:07It's Today Explained. I'm Noelle King. John Lewis is a research fellow at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University. John focuses on Americans who commit violence in the name of ideology. John, what happened in Minnesota is still developing, but Governor Tim Walz called it an assassination. Would you say we know enough at this point to call what happened there political violence? It certainly fits the description of the events, yes. Again, based on the reporting, based on the official comments so far from law enforcement, from Governor Walz, this certainly appears to have been a targeted act.

1:43An individual who was motivated by, again, some ideology, some grievance, whether it's personal or political, who chose these individuals in particular to target, which I think certainly speaks to the potential deeper motivations here. There's been what feels like a lot of this lately. We have the killings of the two Israeli embassy workers in Washington, D.C. We have the attack on the hostage demonstration in Boulder, Colorado. We have Governor Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, his home being set on fire. So it feels like political violence is on the rise. What do the numbers say, though? The numbers absolutely support that.

2:25When we look at the data, we've seen a marked increase in recent years, not only in actual successful plots and attacks, but in the number of arrests and investigations the FBI are involved in when it comes to threats to public officials. I think when we look at the broader societal effects of social media, of COVID, of the normalization of this violent rhetoric into our political mainstream, I think that's really a caustic, perfect storm there to really, again, just inspire your average Americans who are lost, are confused, are dissatisfied, who are looking for answers. And I think in a lot of cases, this rhetoric, this very aggressive, very us versus them kind of rhetoric can really be the trigger for a lot of people who are angry, who are lost, who are confused.

3:22How do we know? Other than headlines, how do we know that violence is increasing? You're an analyst. How do we measure this? Yeah. So there's some excellent research that's being done in this space. You can look at work that's being done by this organization called Insight over at the University of Omaha. It's a DHS-funded center of excellence. They've been studying the drastic spike in cases, in federal cases brought charging people who have been threatening public officials, whether it's calling their office, whether it's stalking, harassing, doxing, swatting, things like that. And then look, you look at the anecdotal cases that we're talking about here.

4:03It's very clear that in recent years we have seen the normalization of this violence, and that is leading these lone actors. And again, barely even ideological in a lot of these cases. We look at the Trump assassination attempt. You look at some of these other cases where the individual clearly barely has a coherent grasp on the ideology and is really just looking for justification. I think that when you really peel that back, you see how prevalent these cases are becoming. Who is doing the violence? Is there a pattern to who's committing these acts? I would say, by and large, the offline violence here is coming from the far right.

4:46It's obviously, it's always important to say that conspiracy theories don't fit neatly into the political spectrum. But when we look at the individuals who are committing this violence, it certainly fits a far right mobilization. There are, of course, left wing leftist attacks. There are lone actor violence on both sides here. But predominantly the dead bodies here when they stack up is not really a close comparison. What should we make of that? I think, look, it's this is the years long consequence of this this campaign to really convince Americans that anyone who is not part of your tribe, your specific in-group is somehow un-American, is somehow less than you and is somehow a worthy target for political violence.

5:43And I think that should be extraordinarily concerning for average Americans everywhere.

5:52I think that many Americans feel, whether they like President Trump or not, that something in the rhetoric began to change when he was elected the first time. Is that just a feeling or is that grounded in reality? No, it's absolutely grounded in reality. I think when you look at the messaging that comes out from President Trump's office, it certainly aligns with the most incendiary, most aggressive rhetoric that we see coming out of the right-wing media ecosystem. And look, this trickles down, right? When you have the president of the United States using language about radical left democratic politicians, calling migrants people who are poisoning the blood of this country.

6:39That sends a powerful message, and it's something that average Americans will pick up and engage with. Does the atmosphere in which we're living now, does it contribute to the reality of political violence? Like, everybody is on edge. I was at the Army's birthday parade this weekend, and nothing happened. I mean, it was actually really rather dull, but the sense was that something could pop off at any time, In part because law enforcement had been, you know, urging people to be cautious, in part because the president had said, if you protest, you're going to be met with violence. Do those kinds of warnings translate into reality?

7:19These vibes don't happen in a vacuum, right? We feel less safe because of the spike in domestic terrorism. We feel less safe because of massive counter protests, violence at protests, a general fear that, you know, this this inherently random type of violence can can happen to us. Again, it's a very it's a very normal, very, very human reaction. President Trump is fairly unrestrained in the way he talks about protesters, immigrants, universities, even the military. How should we think about the message coming from the top and what it may lead to? Well, yeah, look, I mean, I think very simply here, when language used by President Trump, by Stephen Miller, by DHS employees, when that mirrors the exact language used by white supremacist mass shooters in their manifestos, that bodes poorly.

8:26And again, when that mainstream message is being amplified by every neo-Nazi out there, again, because it mirrors the language used by their peers, that just floods the zone with the worst, most abhorrent, most dehumanizing content you can see. And again, you really can't overstate the role of these social media echo chambers. I mean, when it's just day after day after day of these conspiracies from the top getting amplified from the bottom, conspiracies from the bottom amplified by the top, you just get this bidirectional flow of – I mean, it's brain rot really is what it comes down to. Is this unprecedented or has the U.S.

9:17been here before? So look, we've certainly seen spikes in political violence. It's nothing new. We look at the weather underground. We look at other spikes in domestic extremist activity. I think what makes today unique in some cases is the role of social media, right? We are more interconnected than ever. As humans, that's great. For research, that's great. But that also facilitates a lot of our worst qualities as people. And I think it allows, in many instances, these conspiracies, these, again, very racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, hateful narratives, grievances to spread, to fester and to just become just stuck in these social media echo chambers.

10:09What do we do about this, John? This has to start with our elected officials, right? It's very easy to talk about this and to kind of provide the top-level analysis that terrorism is bad, political violence is bad. But we know that, and we've been having these conversations for – again, I mean we're, what, nine years now? I mean, it's going to be the same answers, which is that it has to come from politicians, it has to come from our elected officials on both sides, right, left, top, bottom, to, again, quite simply tamp down on political violence.

10:51But instead what we see day after day after day is this really caustic fanning of the flames predominantly from the right around every single culture war issue. And so I think until we're able to really reckon with that, to call it what it is, and to start beginning to address it, we're going to keep having these conversations, unfortunately.

11:28John Lewis of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University. Coming up, we went to the parade so you didn't have to.

11:49Support for the show comes from Grow Therapy. Everyone thinks they're therapists, especially in the new year, when you might be getting advice from every corner of your life, your feed, your group chat, even your barista. But here's the thing. Advice isn't therapy. Therapy is therapy. And if you're looking to start therapy with licensed professionals, Grow Therapy is there to help. Grow can connect you with thousands of independent licensed therapists across the country, offering both virtual and in-person sessions. You can search therapists by what matters most to you, like insurance, specialty, identity, or availability, and get started in as little as two days.

12:28And if something comes up, you can cancel up to 24 hours in advance at no cost. Grow says there are no subscriptions and no long-term commitments. You just pay per session. Whatever challenges you're facing, Grow Therapy is here to help. Sessions average about$21 with insurance and some pay as little as$0, depending on their plan. Visit growththerapy.com slash explained to get started. That's growththerapy.com slash explained. growththerapy.com slash explained. Availability and coverage vary by state and insurance plan.

13:09Support for the show comes from BoxyCat. There's a lot to love about having a cat in your home. But there's one thing that even the most ardent cat lover could do without. Stinky litter boxes. Boxy says that they can help. Boxy wants to be the last kitty litter you ever try. They say the difference is in their formula, which includes probiotics that can stop bacteria that cause odors. Plus, Boxy says their clumping power is superior, making it easier to scoop so your litter box can be less stinky without any of the fake fragrances. Here's our colleague, Andrew Melnizik, to tell us more. So my sister is that cat mom.

13:46She calls them her children. So when it comes to trying anything new for them, she's incredibly skeptic and always a little hesitant. That's why I was so excited to hear that she was really enjoying Boxy's cat litter. The first thing she noticed, there was just zero issues transitioning to cats. There was no drama from them, which, you know, cats can kind of push back and be a little bit drama. It was really a miracle. If you're tired of switching litters, looking for the one? Get Boxy at B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com. It's the last letter you'll switch to. Enjoy 30 % off with code EXPLAINED at BoxyCat.com slash EXPLAINED.

14:26That's B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com forward slash EXPLAINED.

14:36Estás escuchando Hoy Explicado. You're listening to Today Explained. We're back. I'm Noel King. You might have seen the video circulating from this weekend of a very bored looking President Trump grimacing through the military parade celebrating the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. It was also Trump's birthday. I was at the parade and Trump was not wrong. Attendance was sparse at best. It was a thousand degrees and it was pretty boring. Chris's wife made him come. Well, my wife's from China, and so they have parades like that there, but she's never seen one here before, so she wanted to see a military parade here.

15:15Franco from Argentina was like, eh, I'm in D.C., why not? I don't get the chance to see a military parade every day. Tim was protesting. I am 60 years old. I've never protested anything in my life. And when I saw the military being turned against our own citizens, I had already planned to come down here because I thought a military parade, especially on a sitting president's birthday, was not American. But no one seemed to really care about his protest. Thank you for your service! At least Professor Meredith Lehrer was excited to be there. Meredith is at George Mason University where she studies American culture and the military.

15:58What do you think this event tells us about how President Trump sees the military? I think he sees the military as lethal. I think he sees it as an extension of himself. He has said that this is his military. And I think that the Army's choice to emphasize technology is probably something that the White House and the Army came to collectively, that they really wanted to showcase hardware and showcase power. You said President Trump has said the military is my military. The American president is the commander in chief. What about the way President Trump talks about the military is different from a historian's perspective?

16:39I don't think that any other president has ever said anything like that. I think that other presidents have been more mindful of custom. There's a lot of conversation around President Trump that he breaks norms, that he has violated norms. And I think that his presidencies have forced Americans to come to terms with the fact that a lot of how the White House and the presidency operates are not actually enshrined in the Constitution, they're enshrined in custom. And so he is in that, in stating that this is his military, and in giving a very politicized speech at which MAGA merchandise was for sale at Fort Bragg.

17:18In Los Angeles, the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles.

17:28They're incompetent and they paid troublemakers, agitators and insurrectionists. They're engaged in this willful attempt to nullify federal law and aid the occupation of the city by criminal invaders. He's violating norms there about keeping the U.S. Armed Forces apolitical. And I think it's fair to remember that the U.S. Armed Forces are not a monolith, that there are a lot of progressives who've joined the military because they want to serve or because it was a path out of poverty. I think it's worth remembering that a lot of the rank and file in the U.S. Armed Forces are not native-born. They are immigrants or they are the children of immigrants.

18:11And I am sure that the American soldiery has complicated perspectives on this event and on President Trump's comments about the military. As somebody who studies this stuff, what message does it impart that today is also President Trump's birthday? I don't think that this event can be separated from President Trump because no president since President George Herbert Walker Bush has elected to have a parade of this kind. and you know we can't so we can't divorce it from president trump because it's something that he expressly stated he wanted during his first term and um you know i by the same token i don't think we can divorce it from the larger conversation about the use of the u.s military on american soil so this um for good or bad this event will i think always be associated with these new developments in civil military relations where the military is operating potentially against U.S.

19:16citizens. It's absolutely operating on U.S. soil in Los Angeles right now. And so the army is kind of trying to thread a needle here of focusing on its history, focusing on the equipment and its lethality and trying to remain nonpartisan. And we've talked to a bunch of people out here at the parade today. We had one woman whose son is in the army. She actually came out to see him today. All of this that's going on and we're trying to find him and I can't find him. And I just want to see my baby. She said, I don't think Americans understand enough about service. I don't think we treat the military well.

19:52And then we talked to another man who is protesting today who said, I personally think that we celebrate the military too much in this country. There is a divide in this country between people who, I think it's sometimes even called the civilian military divide, between people who serve or know people who serve or have people in the family who served and people who just haven't. And maybe think, why is this such a big deal? Has this always been the case? No, we're in an interesting moment where the U.S. armed forces is the most lethal, but it's also very small relative to what it was, say, in World War II.

20:27And the role that veterans play in American society is really different now than it was at mid-century. It's very unusual to know people in the military because less than 1 % of Americans will serve in the military. And whereas if you compare that to the post-World War II era, it was very unusual for men not to have served in the military. so everybody's dad and uncle and brother was off fighting overseas or was in the service somewhere here in this country so Vietnam is sort of in the middle where of the 27 million Americans who could have served in the Vietnam era only two and a half million of them actually did go to Vietnam so you know so it's a rare thing now to have been a veteran and it is not the normal thing or the normative thing for Americans to know people in the military.

21:21And I think that is profoundly problematic because I think it has sowed mistrust where people who maybe object to aspects of U.S. foreign policy tend to paint people, individuals in the military with that same brush or make assumptions about their political opinions. And by the same token, I think people in the military who enjoy such a robust set of social welfare benefits don't really understand the fear and the terror that civilians have at not having health insurance and confronting a major health crisis. So I think that both groups have a lot to learn from each other. And I think there is probably room for more compassion.

22:03And I think to the stories that you shared, I think in the end, they're kind of both right. My dad's expression, he's 87 years old and a two-time Vietnam veteran and has, you know, served 22 years in the army. And when people thank him for his service, he talks about what a great life he has as a result of that. And he says, I should be thanking you. Anytime you have an event like this, it is a case of America telling a story of itself about itself. What do you think is the story that America is telling about itself here today? So I could speak for my students. My students, you know, they often will express in their essays and so forth, like this true faith that we are marching towards progress, that everything in the United States will get better and better and better.

22:53And I think that the parade is in a way a sort of metaphor for that, where we can see, you know, with the, there's going to be the soldiers in colonial uniforms and, you know, advancing in time all the way to the 21st century. So there's a progression there in the style of clothing and in the technology and the ability to move troops and supplies from here to there. And so the parade gives a feeling of this inexorable march towards progress. But the reality of American history is that it will, things will advance forward and things will advance back. The Army has a really rich history, and the Army can claim in celebrating its history the liberation of Europe alongside American allies.

23:38It can claim, you know, for individuals, a commitment to duty and faithful service. And as an Army brat and a proud daughter of a Vietnam veteran, I embrace the good parts of that history. But as a historian, I also have to recognize very flawed parts of the Army's story. But those stories will not be represented here.

24:20Meredith Lair of George Mason University. The most exciting part of the parade was leaving the parade on Saturday. You had to exit directly into a group of protesters and you thought, surely this is going to get ugly. And then it didn't. There were a couple shouting matches that quickly wilted. It did seem possible that Minnesota and how easily these things can spin out was on everyone's mind. Lee Babarowska is from Minnesota. He was there to protest. But when I asked him about the killings in his home state, Lee sounded an awful lot like the former cop that he is. They'll catch him. I guarantee they'll catch him.

24:58There's no way they're not going to catch him. Victoria Chamberlain was there. She produced today's show. Miranda Kennedy edited with help from Jolie Myers. We were fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Matthew Billy. And I'm Noelle King. It's Today Explained.

25:22Thank you.

From the publisher

This weekend saw a shocking act of political violence, a military parade in DC, and political protests across the US. What's going on?

This episode was produced by Victoria Chamberlin, edited by Miranda Kennedy with help from Jolie Myers, fact checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Matthew Billy, and hosted by Noel King.

Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast.

Protestors forming the words "No King" gathered in San Francisco. Photo by Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Today, Explained

All 558 episodes
America the extreme Today, Explained · 25 min
Listen in VO