American_history_v9_final_FINAL_THIS ONE

21 Apr 2025 · 26 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Today, Explained - American_history_v9_final_FINAL_THIS ONE

Podcast Details

  • Title: Today, Explained
  • Episode Title: American_history_v9_final_FINAL_THIS ONE
  • Host: Noel King
  • Guests: John Swain (Investigative Reporter at The Washington Post), David W. Blight (Historian, Yale Professor)
  • Produced by: Amanda Lewellyn
  • Edited by: Jolie Myers
  • Fact-Checked by: Laura Bullard
  • Engineered by: Patrick Boyd, Andrea Kristinsdottir
  • Date Aired: [Insert Date Here]
  • Availability: [Listen Here](https://vox.com/members) | [Transcript Here](https://vox.com/today-explained-podcast)

Episode Overview The episode discusses the implications of government revisions to historical narratives in response to executive orders from the Trump administration, particularly regarding the removal of content that highlights diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The episode features discussions on notable American figures whose achievements were erased or altered in government resources due to these changes.

Key Concepts and Discussions

  1. Historical Erasure
  2. Government Action: The episode illustrates the removal of pages from government websites that honored significant American figures like Jackie Robinson and Harriet Tubman as part of compliance with anti-DEI initiatives.
  3. Example of Jackie Robinson: Initially removed from the Department of Defense's website, his page was restored after backlash but highlights the tension surrounding the portrayal of diversity in history.
  1. Executive Orders
  2. Trump's Executive Order: On his first day back in office, Trump issued an executive order titled "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing," reversing Biden's policy on promoting equity across government.
  3. Impact on Departments: The Defense Department and other federal agencies began to delete or alter references to marginalized groups and pivotal historical events, including the removal of pages celebrating minority achievements.
  1. Cultural and Educational Implications
  2. Changes to National Narratives: The episode delves into how historical accounts are being softened or sanitized, particularly those relating to racial equality, women's rights, and Civil Rights struggles.
  3. Little Rock Nine Example: A specific case highlighted was the alteration of the narrative surrounding the Little Rock Nine, where references to their role in pursuing equality were downplayed.
  1. Reactions from Historians
  2. Concerns Over Historical Integrity: Historians express fear about the potential rewriting or oversimplification of history. David W. Blight discusses the long-standing tradition of historical revisionism in America, noting that the current attempts are particularly visible and direct.
  3. Comparative Historical Context: Blight mentions historical attempts at controlling narratives, such as during World War II and McCarthyism, indicating that this is not the first instance of historical revisionism in America.
  1. The Role of Federal Agencies
  2. Pressure on Employees: Some employees within the National Park Service and other agencies felt compelled to remove content due to fear of losing jobs or funding, leading to a culture of self-censorship.
  3. Future Implications: The Smithsonian Institution is highlighted as a potential next target for similar revisions under the administration's directives.

Key Takeaways

  • Historical Revisionism: The episode underscores the ongoing struggle over how history is presented and remembered, particularly regarding marginalized voices.
  • Cultural Memory at Stake: The removal of significant narratives from history poses a risk to understanding America's complex past, as it attempts to create a sanitized version of history that ignores uncomfortable truths.
  • Historians' Vigilance: The episode calls for awareness among historians and the general public to be vigilant against attempts to rewrite history in a way that diminishes the contributions and struggles of diverse groups.

Conclusion The episode presents a critical examination of the ongoing cultural and political battle over historical narratives in the United States, particularly as it pertains to diversity and inclusion. This discourse is vital in understanding how past events are framed in the present and their implications for future generations.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Mr. Jackie Robinson, number 42, integrated baseball, not because DEI, but because he was so good that to paraphrase his manager, I don't care if the guy is yellow or black or if he has stripes like a fucking zebra, he can make us all rich. Jackie Robinson steps in against Ford. Deep in the left center, Irv Noren races after Robinson's blast. Jackie really teed off on Ford. He also served in the military, during which time he was court-martialed after peacefully refusing to move to the back of an army bus. He was acquitted. The Department of Defense website featured Robinson in a section called Sports Heroes Who Served until March 19th, when his page disappeared and the URL redirected to one that had the letters DEI in front of sports heroes.

0:47A Pentagon spokesman defended the removal, but about 90 minutes later, the page was restored. That spokesman resigned last week. Ahead on Today Explained, the Trump administration tries to rewrite history. support for this show comes from the home depot this holiday season you can take advantage of holiday savings on a wide selection of top smart home security products from the brands you can trust and you can do it at the home depot the home depot has everything you need to make your home smarter with the latest technology and products that let you control and automate your home so you can protect your peace of mind whether you're away or at home this season the home depot smart homes start here

1:31Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, and options, and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. Go to public.com slash podcast and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash podcast. Paid for by Public Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory service by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Generated assets is an interactive analysis tool.

2:03Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures.

2:17You're listening to Today Explained.

2:24It's Today Explained. And I'm Noel King with John Swain, who's an investigative reporter at The Washington Post. John, the mess that we're here to discuss today started with an executive order from President Trump. What was the order and how did it lead to the reporting that you've been doing? That's right. On President Trump's first day back in office, he issued an order titled Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing. And basically this order reversed something that Joe Biden had ordered very early in his term, which was the Biden administration made it government policy to pursue equity.

3:02And that means we need to make the issue of racial equity not just an issue for any one department of government. It has to be the business of the whole of government. That involved training and programs in the government to make that happen. and President Trump's order scrapped all that. It said, we're not going to do that anymore. It's immoral, it's wasteful. Discrimination programs, that's what he calls them, are gone. We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit-based.

3:38A key step in this sequence was the Defense Department under Pete Hegseth taking President Trump's executive order and kind of running with it, saying that it applied to the Defense Department's web presence and kind of publications. The Pentagon has taken down thousands of pages honoring women and minority groups. Credits attacked the U.S. Department of Defense after a web page was removed that honored the military career of sports legend Jackie Robinson. They called it a digital content refresh, which explicitly ordered the Defense Department to take these things down. And my reporting on this area began there.

4:19We found that several notable veterans from minority groups, so Native Americans, African Americans, pages that had been published celebrating their achievements. And one in particular that we focused on was one of the Marines who hoisted up the flag at Iwo Jima towards the end of the Second World War. Those pages had just been taken down. So other government departments, federal agencies, seem to take the lead from the Defense Department and start doing the same thing. So we at The Post, we really wanted to look at more broad historical themes. Was the government looking at places online where the government wrote about American history and possibly making any changes there?

5:01And so we went looking really for places online where the federal government writes about American history.

5:10I don't really know the ins and outs of the Battle of Iwo Jima. What did the Marines at Iwo Jima do that got them taken down off a government website? It wasn't really what the Marines at Iwo Jima did. We all know the image of them hoisting the flag, the U.S. flag, as a sort of emblem of the victory in the Second World War. On February 23rd, 1945, the Marines raised the U.S. flag atop Mount Surabachi as a signal to the troops below that the mountain was won. That flag was seen around the world. One of the Marines was a Pima Indian. His name was Ira Hayes. And a page on the Defense Department's website celebrated the fact that he had been a Native American and that he had taken part in this sort of emblematic, iconic moment in U.S.

6:01military history. and it was just a page that talked about his life. You know, his life actually had ended quite sadly. He wasn't really supported after the war and he had problems with alcohol and he died relatively young without a family. But this page was just a sort of small tribute to the small role he played in a big part of American history. And it was just taken down because it had focused on his ethnicity, basically. Aha, so they kept the iconic picture up but they removed the information about Mr. Hayes being American Indian. What other kinds of changes did you uncover in your reporting?

6:38So when we turned our attention to the National Park Service, we found quite quickly, actually, that several themes kept coming up. Pages that dealt with women's rights, pages that dealt with civil rights and the sort of struggle for racial equality in the 20th century, and pages that looked at the Civil War and even earlier, sometimes the founding and the Revolutionary War and slavery around that time in the 18th and 19th centuries, there were changes being made. And we noticed that in the most part, they were going one way, which was to soften the accounts and to remove some of the references to enslavement, to slaves, to the pursuit of equality by civil rights advocates and to remove mentions of some of the struggles that women in the Park Service, for example, had had when they were working there.

7:34One of the cases that really leapt out was the Little Rock Nine. So people may remember in the 1950s, nine brave young African-American students walked through an angry mob to integrate their high school in Arkansas. This girl here was the first Negro, apparently, of high school age. She'd show up at Central High School the day that the federal court ordered it integrated. She was followed in front of the school by an angry crowd, many of them shouting, epithets at her. The Little Rock High School, where this happened, is now a National Parks monument, essentially. It's a site, an historic site, and it has a web presence.

8:17And we found that on like half a dozen pages on their website, a reference that had been there to the fact that the Little Rock Nine had opened doors for people around the world seeking equality and education had been changed to just education. So their pursuit of equality and the opening doors to other people pursuing equality had just been erased. And I called one of them Elizabeth Eckford. And she appears in some of the very memorable photography from the time. And I just talked her through it and said what was happening to the website. And she was shocked. She said they were trying to rewrite history and that true racial reconciliation would never come until the painful past and the wrongs of the past were acknowledged.

9:08I wonder if you were able to talk to employees of the Park Service and ask them how they're deciding which pages to change or to take down. Are they being given order? Are they making these choices on their own? I did speak with some current employees and it was a couple of things. First, they said that the Park Service is overseen by the Department of the Interior. And they said that early on in this Trump administration, political appointees at the Interior Department had directed senior Park Service people to have their employees scour the websites for potentially problematic content in light of President Trump's executive order.

9:48This was at a time, as people will remember, suddenly tens of thousands of federal employers were being fired from their jobs or their projects were being cut. And I think people were scared that they might lose their job if they didn't do a strong enough job in this request. And so that was one way. but one employer I spoke to told me about an even more interesting thing that happened I think which is that some corners of the park service that weren't even given this instruction took it upon themselves to do it anyway because they they'd heard on the grapevine that things were happening that people were changing websites and and they too were scared that their projects might lose funding that they might lose their jobs and they kind of thought well we better get our house in order and make it acceptable to the political appointees above us, because if they stumble upon our website and it's full of championing equality and so on, we could be in trouble.

10:43And so some people, without even being told, were making these changes off their own back. So we've talked about the Park Service. We've talked about the Department of Defense. Is this something happening elsewhere to either other agencies, other websites? I think the next thing to look for is the Smithsonian Institution. While we were reporting on the National Park Service, President Trump issued another executive order specifically targeting the Interior Department and the Smithsonian on what he called a sort of liberal rewriting of history that had happened prior to him coming back to office.

11:19And so he has directed the Smithsonian and the Park Service to make sure that exhibitions, monuments and statues and markers at historical sites do not do what he calls sort of unfair traducing of Americans past and present.

11:42I think, well, it's clear that lots of historians are very worried about this because we all know that historic figures are complicated. The founding fathers, many of them held slaves. There are these parts of history that are uncomfortable and unpleasant that have to be reconciled. I think most people agree with the good and the heroic. And I think a lot of historians are concerned that President Trump wants to get rid of the uncomfortable and the unpleasant.

12:17And we're going to have more with a deeply concerned historian when we come back. John Swain of The Washington Post investigative reporter. Thanks to him.

12:39Support for the show today comes from none other than HIMSS. Erectile dysfunction can make you feel like you aren't yourself. HIMS says they can help you get back to the best version of you with personalized ED treatments that are prescribed by licensed providers including daily meds that support more spontaneous moments sounds fun HIMS says they offer access to ED treatment options including trusted generics that cost 95 % less than brand names if prescribed and since HIMS is 100 % online you can get the care you need from the comfort of your own home no sitting around under fluorescent lights reading a week's old magazine while you wait for an appointment Remember magazines?

13:17You can get simple online access to personalized affordable care for ED, hair loss, weight loss, and more by visiting hims.com slash explained. That's hims.com slash explained for your free online visit. Hims.com slash explained. Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan. Featured products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness, or quality. Prescription required. See website for details, restrictions, and important safety information.

13:48Support for the show comes from BoxyCat. There's a lot to love about having a cat in your home. But there's one thing that even the most ardent cat lover could do without. Stinky litter boxes. Boxy says that they can help. Boxy wants to be the last kitty litter you ever try. They say the difference is in their formula, which includes probiotics that can stop bacteria that cause odors. Plus, Boxy says their clumping power is superior, making it easier to scoop so your litter box can be less stinky without any of the fake fragrances. Here's our colleague, Andrew Malnizik, to tell us more. So my sister is that cat mom.

14:25She calls them her children. So when it comes to trying anything new for them, she's incredibly skeptic and always a little hesitant. That's why I was so excited to hear that she was really enjoying Boxy's cat litter. The first thing she noticed, there was just zero issues transitioning to cats. There was no drama from them, which, you know, cats can kind of push back and be a little bit drama. It was really a miracle. If you're tired of switching litters looking for the one, get Boxy at B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com. It's the last litter you'll switch to. Enjoy 30 % off with code EXPLAINED at BoxyCat.com slash EXPLAINED.

15:05That's B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com forward slash EXPLAINED.

15:15Support for this show comes from Vanta. Vanta uses AI and automation to get you compliant fast, simplify your audit process, and unblock deals so you can prove to customers that you take security seriously. You can think of Vanta as your always-on AI-powered security expert who scales with you. That's why top startups like Cursor, Linear, and Replit use Vanta to get and stay secure. Get started at Vanta.com slash Vox. That's V-A-N-T-A dot com slash Vox. Vanta.com slash Vox.

15:57This is Today Explained. We're back with historian and Yale professor David W. Blight. I study slavery, abolition, the Civil War, Reconstruction, and African-American history over time. Okay, so nothing that's ever been contested. Well, what do you mean contested? I'm joking. I'm joking. Yeah, it's always been a little edgy, but actually never as much as right now. In the first half of the show, Professor Blight, we heard that many historians are really quite angry about some of the changes that the Trump administration has been demanding. What does an angry historian look like? What's been going on?

16:39Well, just a week ago from where we are now in Chicago, the Organization of American Historians had its annual gathering. I, for my sins, was the current president. It was almost a kind of a rolling fear and despair in a lot of the conversations. And in many cases, it was a counsel of fear because, let's face it, historians don't have, we don't have a legal defense fund. We don't have huge resources by any means. I don't think the history profession has ever received quite a frontal attack like this. They are going for the essence of what it means to do research and convert it into the narratives of history.

17:29We often, reporters will often say Donald Trump is unprecedented. The things that he does are unprecedented. I imagine you would tell me the United States has in the past tried to rewrite its own history at certain points. Many times, yes. Give me some examples of the times we've tried to do this. During World War II, the United States created a massive propaganda machine called the Office of War Information. Now, that's what governments do during wartime. They do. But that organization did indeed engage in a lot of propaganda, selling stories to keep Americans patriotic. And the people of the United States, an angry people whose resources and privileges were the envy of the world, offering things without stick, fighting in the factories and the foxholes.

18:22Move ahead from that to McCarthyism. Anti-communism was a very deep phenomenon in America, and not without some reasons in the 30s and 40s and the warriors and immediately after. But McCarthyism caused a wave of attempts of trying to control what writers wrote, what historians could teach, who could teach anything. The thing that the American people can do is to be vigilant day and night to make sure they don't have communists teaching the sons and daughters of America. Let's take the Civil War, if you want. In 1865 to 1870, 75, there was an organization in the South, for example, that called themselves the Southern Historical Society.

19:13Society. That was originally made up mostly of former Confederate officers who were determined to try to control the story of what the war had been about, what they had actually fought for, what their crusade meant, what the Confederacy actually was. What was the story they were trying to sell? They told a story that we've come to know as the Confederate lost cause. Namely, they were arguing early on that they did not really lose the war on the battlefield. They only lost to superior numbers and resources. They said they lost only to the Leviathan of northern industrialization. There's some truth in that, but that's not the full explanation.

19:57They also argued in season and out for generations that the war was not really about slavery. It was really about state sovereignty and states' rights. It was really about resisting the federal interference with their lives and their civilization and their mores and folkways. Can I jump in and actually just tell you something? I'm from central New York. I went to public school. That was what I learned. Wow. Why did I learn something that wasn't true in public school? Well, because over time, in culture and in schooling and in politics and in rituals from the 1870s and 80s well on into the 20th century and still surviving in a textbook you were learning from in the 1990s, I am sorry to hear, was this idea that the United States divided, terribly divided.

21:04It had this all-out horrific war. But it had to put itself back together again. It had to reunite. It had to have reunion. And how do you have reunion? How do you put back together something so horrifically divided? You're going to have to find mutuality. You're going to have to find some kind of unified narrative. Well, one of the unified narratives, they did develop in the 19th century. And there's reality to this, is that you unify around the valor of soldiers. But if we admire valor without ever looking at the cause for which they fought, it's, of course, limited. Now, the typical and powerful belief in the national reunion that occurred in America by the late 19th, early 20th century was that everybody in that war fought for the cause they believed in.

22:01and if you fought for the cause you believed in with great valor, you fought for the right. Everybody was equal in valor. The causes had to be muted, put aside. Well, you know, and we all know that that's a part of human relations as well. How do you keep a family together? Well, there's some things you don't talk about, but for nations and whole peoples and cultures, the dangers in this is that the stories you take on the stories you develop that define the identity of who you are the identity of your nation the identity of your past and now your future is going to leave somebody out in fact it may end up allowing you to reconcile on the backs of those who most suffered from the conflict you are trying to reconcile Well, obviously, that meant in America, black Americans in the South or the North.

23:03It meant their civil and political rights, which were created and then slowly but surely abandoned and then crushed in the Jim Crow system of the South. Now, the point of all of this is that that lost cause, Confederate lost cause that said the South fought for noble ends. They fought for their homes. They fought for their sovereignty. They fought for their integrity. It eventually becomes, though, not a story of loss at all. It becomes, by the 1890s and into the 20th century, a victory narrative.

23:43And this was an age now of a lot of sentimental literature. Americans came to love stories of the Old South. And, of course, it's there in Gone with the Wind, the most, still maybe, the most famous movie ever made. Most of the miseries of the world were caused by wars. And when the wars were over, no one ever knew what they were about. So the Lost Cause was both, was a political movement, it was a literary movement, but it was at its core a racial ideology. And it lasted a very long time. Now that was a version of history. That was a version of history, but let's compare that to what we're seeing today.

24:30What you're talking about with these popular books and Gone with the Wind and then they make it a movie, that seems to me more subtle than the president says, you delete that information about Jackie Robinson's military service from the website. Will what Trump is doing succeed because it is so unsubtle? that's a very good question and my my instinctive answer is partly my wishful answer is that no he won't it is not subtle you're right they're wiping out websites they are explicitly saying professional history whether it's in our greatest museums or our greatest This university has been teaching us all the wrong ways.

25:17They've been dividing us. This is the word they love to use. The history we write has been divisive, divisive, divisive. Well, no, it's not. It's simply informative. Sometimes it gets people riled up and sometimes it gets them arguing and sometimes fighting. But what the Trumpists are doing is they are telling us that they know better. policy people at the Heritage Foundation or pseudo-historians who think that studying all this stuff about race, studying all this stuff about gender, studying all this stuff about all the ethnicities that make us up, all this pluralism, is just taking away from American greatness.

25:59And they use that term a lot. We're no longer teaching our youth about American greatness. Yes, we are. We're teaching our youth that our greatness is in the pluralism. Our greatness is in the amazing strivings and triumphs of all kinds of people in the past who challenged power. What will you know about World War I if you try to find nothing but greatness? What will you know about the history of imperialism and expansion if all you want to knows about greatness. What will you actually know about Native American history if all you look for is greatness?

Read the full transcript

26:43It defies the intelligence of anyone with an education and a whole lot of people who don't have a lot of formal education. I'm not very optimistic right now about what's going on, but I do have a certain faith that people just aren't going to buy this.

27:17Professor David Blight of Yale. Amanda Llewellyn, producer, Jolie Myers editor, Andrea Christensdottir, and Patrick Boyd engineers. Laura Bullard keeps us honest. President Trump, we can give you her cell number if you want. I'm Noelle King. It's Today Explained.

27:35Thank you.

28:04about the smart home. And then we're going to go room by room through a real house, my real house, and try to figure out how to make it smart and how to make all of that smart make sense. All of that and much more on The Verge Cast, wherever you get podcasts. This special series is presented by The Home Depot. When it comes to sales, efficiency is the name of the game. Every minute you spend manually entering data and chasing down documents is a lost opportunity to close the deal. That's where PipeDrive comes in. Pipe Drive lets you supercharge every sale by automating the process for your entire team.

28:39From scheduling sales calls to email marketing, it's a powerful, simple CRM built by salespeople for salespeople. Join the over 100 ,000 companies already using Pipe Drive. No credit card or payment needed. Just head to pipedrive.com slash vox to get started. That's pipedrive.com slash vox and get started with a 30-day free trial.

From the publisher

Government websites have erased references to American heroes like Harriet Tubman and Jackie Robinson in order to comply with Trump’s anti-DEI push. But America is no stranger to revisionist history.

This episode was produced by Amanda Lewellyn, edited by Jolie Myers, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Andrea Kristinsdottir, and hosted by Noel King.

Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast.

Jackie Robinson, who integrated Major League Baseball in 1947, posing in his batting stance. Photo credit Bettmann/Getty Images.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Today, Explained

All 558 episodes
American_history_v9_final_FINAL_THIS ONEToday, Explained · 26 min
Listen in VO