Hasan Piker’s challenge to the center

15 Aug 2026 · 36 min · 10 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Democratic Party “civil war” between progressives and moderates, focused on recent midterm primaries and what it means for the general election and the 2028 presidential primary. Episode centers on Twitch streamer Hasan Piker’s role as a left insurgency figure and the “electability” debate after mixed results in states like Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.

Guest backgrounds

Hasan Piker is a prominent Twitch streamer and controversial lightning rod for establishment Democrats; he’s described as an unofficial mouthpiece for the left. Host is Kara Swisher (Pivot/America Actually), interviewing him.

Key claims

Piker argues insurgent campaigns can win via strong ground games and consolidation strategies (citing Wisconsin’s centrist consolidation against left candidates). He rejects narratives that democratic socialists are “dying,” and says working-class coalitions are broader than the stereotypical coal-miner voter. He claims controversies (e.g., his Zhongshan/Mao-related outfit) are “immaterial” compared to policy and media framing, and that electability fears are a primary-era tactic.

Notable examples

Michigan left win; Minnesota win for Peggy Flanagan; Wisconsin loss for Francesca Hong; Wisconsin consolidation around David Crowley/Rodriguez; comparisons to 2020 Bernie vs Biden; Abdul El-Sayed’s close margin; references to AOC/Bernie endorsements absence in Hong’s race; Zoran (unnamed here) and Shoykha Chakrabarty as other left insurgent examples.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Hasan Piker on Progressive Politics

1:06 to 2:49

Hasan Piker discusses the recent electoral results and their implications for progressive candidates.

“You know me as co-host of Pivot, but for August, I'm flying solo.”

Challenges for Left-Wing Candidates

2:49 to 4:49

Piker shares insights on the mixed results for left-wing candidates and their need to strategize against the establishment.

“and controversial lightning rod for the center.”

Redefining the Working Class

4:49 to 11:09

Piker explores the changing definition of the working class and the electoral challenges faced by progressive candidates.

“I want to ask about some of the takeaways that at least media is taking from this.”

Trust in Government and Voter Cynicism

11:09 to 14:00

Discussion on voter cynicism, particularly among working-class individuals and the importance of good governance.

“I think we just have more work to do in that regard.”

Cynicism and Trust in Government

14:00 to 14:50

Discussing the impact of cynicism on voters' trust in government.

“If you're working a gig economy job, you've just been destroyed, right?”

Electability and Progressive Candidates

17:20 to 23:44

Exploring the concept of electability in relation to progressive candidates.

“I wanted to come back to electability because you mentioned it.”

Obama's Legacy and Democratic Strategy

23:44 to 28:00

Debating Barack Obama's influence on contemporary Democratic strategies.

“It's not like these guys are, you know, out in the water, totally blind.”

Navigating Democratic Nominee Preferences

28:00 to 30:20

Exploration of what qualities voters look for in Democratic candidates.

“Would you support a Democratic nominee for president that was, you know, a wash in AIPAC money or who didn't support Medicare for all, but J.D.”

The Democratic Civil War and Electability

30:20 to 33:05

Analysis of internal conflicts within the Democratic Party regarding strategy and electability.

“It's like, we haven't stopped being a part of this movement.”

Historical Context of Democratic Strategies

33:05 to 35:09

Discussion on the historical factors influencing current Democratic strategies and voter dynamics.

“And yet we have had an answer for this even before Trumpism became a thing.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Astead Herndon:Now, we've been talking about the civil war happening in the Democratic Party all summer in New York City. The politics of the past ends today. In Michigan. Listen, man, if you can't say the name, it's Abdurrahman. Keep the name out your damn mouth. And most recently, in Wisconsin. You know, I always say that every day is a good day. In Wisconsin, it is a very good day. And I know what you're saying. We've heard this story before. Moderates versus progressives. The DSA versus the establishment. But after Francesca Hong's loss in Wisconsin, it seems we should talk about this at least one more time.

0:39Astead Herndon:Because the map is telling us a mixed story. Some wins for the left, some wins for the center. And a big open question about what happens in the general election. Democrats say they welcome a Big Ten party for progressives and for moderates. But does the left agree? What we want is a clear agenda, a clear vision for a better future. We're going to ask Twitch streamer Hasan Piker this week on America Actually. Let's dig in.

1:15Astead Herndon:Hi, it's Kara Swisher. You know me as co-host of Pivot, but for August, I'm flying solo. and I've lined up some incredible guest hosts to join me. Mark Cuban, Chelsea Handler, Caitlin Collins, and a lot more you won't want to miss. Already out, my conversation with Hillary Clinton. Among many other things, we get into redistricting fights, reshaping state politics, and what Trump's golden makeover of the presidency actually means. And it's not good. Trust me, you don't want to skip this one. Find Pivot on YouTube or wherever you listen to podcasts. So the most prominent progressive Democrats share at least one thing in common.

1:54Astead Herndon:Hassan Piker's stream. Soram Amdani, AOC, Bernie Sanders, even midterms candidates like Daria Liza, Avila Shevalier in New York City, or Abdul El-Sayed and Francesca Hong out in the Midwest. They've all talked to Hassan Piker. And that has infuriated some establishment Democrats who argue that Piker's past controversial statements, anti-Israel commentary, and just general bro-iness are toxic to everyday voters. We first talked to Piker back in June and explored some of the drama that seems to surround him. But that was back when the Democratic primaries were yet to be decided. So this time, I wanted to ask Piker about more than just the primaries.

2:35Astead Herndon:How does he plan to conduct himself in a general election? And do results like Michigan prove that his politics is popular? or do results like Wisconsin show that he's a liability? Here's our conversation. Hassan Piker is with us, unofficial mouthpiece of the left and controversial lightning rod for the center. How are you? Both good and bad. I imagine this is some of the reaction to Wisconsin. The last two weeks have produced mixed results for left wing candidates. A big win in Michigan and a win this week in Minnesota for Peggy Flanagan, but a loss for Francesca Hong, which was a surprise in Wisconsin.

3:12Astead Herndon:What have been your takeaways from the last set of results? I think ground game is phenomenal. There's a lot of excitement on the platform. There's a lot of excitement for the first time for change candidates. It's still a very good environment to be in if you are a socialist. The establishment does have a lot of juice still, for sure. And when they can put together a similar strategy to what happened in 2020 against Bernie Sanders with Joe Biden, especially in a place like Wisconsin, where Tony Evers is like very clearly still a very popular governor. They were able to, to elevate David Crowley's campaign who actually had dropped out and consolidated support behind Rodriguez initially.

3:58And he had to drop out because he was only performing at like 6%. Yeah.

4:02Astead Herndon:The consolidation was swift and it was complete. I mean, you're comparing it to 2020 in which the establishment lined up behind Joe Biden and kind of nixed that Bernie Sanders campaign in a blink of an eye. I guess for you, I just want to start with the emotion. Like, I imagine you were surprised at the result. I never underestimate my opponents, whether they be Republicans or whether they be establishment Democrats. You know, you have to always operate as though you're down 10 points. I don't believe in the notion that we are going to win easy victories at the end of the day. There are a lot of people, there are a lot of powerful interests at play here.

4:41There are a lot of people in positions of power that don't want to lose their seats. So they're going to fight like hell. So we have to also fight like hell. We have to fight extra hard as a matter of fact, because, you know, we're, we're almost always outspent.

4:53Astead Herndon:I want to ask about some of the takeaways that at least media is taking from this. I got an alert right before we started talking from the New York Times that said, a democratic socialist lost in Wisconsin shows the movement surging wave might crash before rippling out from big cities. Is that wrong?

5:16Oh, I love that. Look, people are going to have their opinions. I'll just say it like this. Abdu 'l Sayed's one point victory margin showed that the democratic socialist aligned movement or the progressive movement was in tatters. It was obviously a failure. And now David Crowley's less than one point victory proves that the centrist bulwark is still here and that the democratic socialist movement is dying. It kind of feels like it's a wish casting for the most part from a lot of people who maybe want to go back to the way things used to be. My assessment on this is definitely a little bit different.

5:57I think at the end of the day, these are insurgencies, right? These are insurgent candidacies. We're talking about no name recognition for a state legislator that was entirely propped up by local Wisconsin DSA chapters. I mean, these people, they didn't have a lot of money necessarily, and they were able to defy the odds, and they continued defying the odds all the way into the end. The idea that the polls showed that Francesca was a clear front runner and was running away with this race is utterly irrelevant, especially if you were to look at this with a broader perspective, like thinking about where democratic socialists of America have gotten to in the last two years.

6:41I mean, I remember how I felt in 2024, you know, in the aftermath of the DNC about where the American socialist movement was, as opposed to where it is now. We are clearly a force to be reckoned with. And that's precisely the reason why a lot of people are paying close attention to what's going on. And I'll say it like this. The fact that the Hong campaign did not have any major progressive national endorsements and that I was like their top. There was no Bernie Sanders

7:08Astead Herndon:endorsement. There was no AOC endorsement that did make the Hong campaign unique on that front. Yeah. And I, well, not necessarily. I think there were a couple other races that I was also involved in that, you know, my candidates lost, right? I mean, Shoykha Chakrabarty was another great example of this as well as it wasn't a statewide race and obviously uh there's always clear local differences that that you know play a formative role in how these races uh turn out but in our experience we've looked back at this data there's a there's an endorsement tracker there's a couple different endorsement trackers out there and it's like they'll put my endorsement up there and they'll put like aoc and bernie sanders and it's very clear that like the best likelihood of success usually comes from a consolidation of national progressive forces, whether it be like outside expenditures coming from, you know, justice Democrats or things like that.

7:59And, you know, with the Francesca Han campaign, I think it's a, it's a testament to their success. It's a testament to how popular the platform is in general. And one thing I will have to stress here is the salience of the electability narrative, I think that's still a real motivator for a lot of people.

8:20Astead Herndon:I hear that. I guess one question I wanted to ask out of these results, though, is both El-Sayed's campaign and Hong's campaign did better among middle class voters, I should say, than the data would tell us among working class voters. Considering how central working class and kind bottom-up issues are to the DSA message, why has it not produced results that actually get it more working-class votes? Because that does seem to be something we've learned over the last three, four weeks. Yeah. I think that we have to dramatically reconstruct how we understand what it means to be working-class in this country.

8:56I think a lot of people will cast aside, and you might agree with what I'm about to say here, but we have to do away with this fantastical notion that the working class is one specific thing. I think for the longest time, people have thought about this hard hat wearing coal miner as the true working class, oftentimes white as well. And the working class is unbelievably diverse in this country. And it's also a lot more college educated than people actually give it credit for. I think partially this is because like, yeah, if you look back to the nineties, as opposed to right now, Now, yes, if you had a college education, you were upwardly mobile.

9:34You were probably a professional managerial class individual that was going to be able to retire at a reasonable age. You were doing fairly well. It was a guarantee for getting a job, a good job, right? That's not the case in America any longer. There are a lot more people who have a college degree who are downwardly mobile, who are having a very tough time in the current job market, who do not own a home. And it's seemingly less likely than before that they will ever be able to own or purchase a home. And that is the actual working class. It's much broader, right? So we've seen in Zoran's race and in Abdul's race, there's this massive middle class of working class folks that constantly get cast aside as not being a true representation of the American working class.

10:25when I think like, no, that is the true representation. That is a big component of it. Now, the other side of the story, of course, is just like with Andrew Cuomo, Haley Stevens won with the wealthiest voters.

10:37Astead Herndon:The wealthiest and the poorest. Yeah, the wealthiest voters and the poorest voters. And I find that, I mean, there is no immediate answer to that question. I think that is a real issue to try and have more of an impact and to be able to speak to not the wealthiest voters necessarily, but the poorest voters because these policies are policies that target them and seek to alleviate some of their concerns, some of their immediate material struggles. I think we just have more work to do in that regard. Ultimately, a lot of people, I think especially in that category of the poorest voters, they're unbelievably busy and uh perhaps some of them like the rest of the the democratic primary electorate is a defensive voter the electability narrative is very important for them like they're they're locked in on on what ms now is saying is is the best possible or to say it in a more good faith way they're locked in on what donald trump is doing and and maybe the people are the people who most clearly respond to that sometimes can be centrist or establishment or particularly when they're putting that message in front of you on television yeah no i uh the reason why i say it like that is you're absolutely right about the trump thing by the way 100 but like we are worried about that as well it's not like it's not like someone like myself is saying like i don't care about donald trump i don't care if the democrats lose i don't care if the democrats don't maintain a senate majority as long as i get my message across like that's ridiculous that's never been my concern.

12:14Like I do care. That is precisely the reason why I wanted Kamala Harris to make different choices when she was campaigning. Like from my worldview, and I think we're going to be able to prove this in at least certain races, like this is good policy and good politics, right? Instead, I'm sure you've, you know, you've traveled the country. So I'm sure you've probably had this similar mind boggling experience where someone, especially in the primaries will come up to you and say, you know, I really liked, you know, insert left insurgent candidate. I really liked their policies. I, but I just simply don't think other people will vote for them.

12:49Astead Herndon:So I had to vote for this other person playing pundit in your head is a huge democratic primary base, uh, activity, but favorite pastime of theirs. Yes. Yeah. We like to call it pundit brain. A lot of Democrats I think have pundit brain. That's why I keep saying like, Oh, it's MS now it's CNN. These people are terrified of Donald Trump winning just like we are. They're terrified of Trumpism. We are as well. Right. And they're actually more in line with our agenda. And they're a part of this, but they just haven't they haven't, I guess, bought into the to the idea that this could be one way to more effectively destroy Trumpism in this country, effectively destroy any kind of stranglehold the Republicans have.

13:33Astead Herndon:There's a lot in that, and I want to pull out some of it, but I want to go back to the question I just asked. I mean, I think it's important to acknowledge what you said. The definition of working class is certainly changing over the years, and I think that's important. But to the point about the poorest voters, you all have confidence, as you have laid out, that the policies are ones that suit those people. But we're not seeing the translation in votes, particularly in the primaries so far. Is there something about the DSA message that misses people who didn't go to college? I think people are very cynical.

14:05If you're working a gig economy job, you've just been destroyed, right? You've been destroyed by your circumstances. So I think there's an element of like not daring to dream as well for a lot of these voters where they're just like, yeah, I think this guy's just selling me something that could be part of it, right? I just don't think that the average American has any confidence in their government. So that's why I always stress the importance of good governance and its associations with democratic socialism, even at the municipal level, even when it comes to constituent services, because we have a lot of work to do to make sure that people trust their government again.

14:49Astead Herndon:Hi, everybody. It's Megan Rapinoe. I've been thinking a lot about this one question I've been asked over and over. A question about the choices I've made, the colors of my hair, the things in the world I've spoken about, and the things that I haven't. I've heard this question asked so many different ways, but it always came down to, why are you like this? And as you know, there's no simple answer because people are not simple. We're messy and complicated and contradictory and layered. So on my new show, I'm sitting down with the ultimate disruptors, the athletes, the artists, the activists, and the architects of our culture who looked at the way things were and asked, why do we do it like this?

15:33Astead Herndon:And can we do it differently? My hope is to give us a little more space to that question and to the person on the other side of the mic, not to tell us their answer or read from their script, but to take us on their journey. Check out my new show, Why Are You Like This? on YouTube or listen in your favorite podcast app. New episodes drop every Thursday. Megan Rapinoe here. This week on Why Are You Like This, I got to sit down with legendary Minnesota Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve in Chicago during All-Star Weekend. We get into her personal style of activism, how she supports her players as people, and why she proudly considers herself a dyke.

16:14Astead Herndon:Then we learn if she's more of a mommy, daddy, or baby. Check out the latest episode of Why Are You Like This wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube.

16:26Astead Herndon:Hello, everyone. It's Sean. And Noelle. And we want to take a moment to talk to you about why we make this show. We make this show because we genuinely want to help you understand what's happening in Saffold. And why it's happening. The context. We think that this is very valuable. And Vox members help us keep making this show. And they get access to some perks. Let's listen, Sean. First, ad-free listening on Today Explained and all Vox podcasts. People love the ad-free listening. We love the ad-free listening. Unlimited reading at Vox.com. People love unlimited reading. Exclusive newsletters.

17:05Astead Herndon:People love newsletters, right? It's like the new club. Vox.com slash members to join. Thank you.

17:22Astead Herndon:I wanted to come back to electability because you mentioned it. It has been something that, you know, the establishment has successfully wielded over the last several years. And one of the arguments they make about these progressive candidates is that their association with you makes them unelectable. Candidates like Abdul El-Sayed and Mamdani, they sound like you on Israel, maybe you're taxing the rich, but they don't sound like you when it comes to being complimentary about communism or Mao Zedong, who we talked about in our last conversation. Is Wisconsin not evidence that some of those statements may have an electoral cost?

17:57Astead Herndon:Is Wisconsin not evidence that maybe you're a drag on electability? No, I don't think so. Or at least the campaigns don't seem to think so. And a big part of that is because these close races are regarded as like, you know, upset victories for either party or either faction of the party. because polling was just completely out of whack. It's an expectation game more than you think. Yeah, I think that's a big part of it. And it's ironic because I never represent that level of confidence until it's done. I'm always very, very nervous until the victory is announced, right? Until the last vote is counted.

18:41And yet there is definitely an expectation game there. And when those expectations are subverted in either direction, that becomes the driving media narrative. I think the fact that the Abdul race was so close meant that, you know, the fact that I was able to bring in the under 45 crowd early on and fundraise in key moments probably helped a lot in driving him across the finish line.

19:06Astead Herndon:I hear what you're saying. You're saying like, you know, there's evidence of you helping those candidates, particularly maybe young people. And you don't think that the results in their closeness shows some need for like, you know, the big piker step back or, or, or, or something like that. Yeah. I, and, and, and I've explained this a million times over, which no one seems to care about, but like, I don't actually appreciate doing the, the travel and the, and the, well, the rallies are fun, but the reality of the matter is from a pure content perspective, I'm looking at it from like a, uh, like a commentator.

19:40I mean, I, I have far bigger viewership. I make more money sitting at home, you know, like I'm doing this specifically because I do think it helps. And I want people to participate in electoral democracy in much more meaningful ways because I am a firm and committed believer that regardless of where my politics are, regardless of what my worldview looks like, I think in the interim, like, well, first of all, democracy is good, but also in the interim, I think it's important for us to participate in it instead of casting it aside. One thing that I always say is it's the age old notion that like, if your vote didn't matter, the Republicans wouldn't stop you so aggressively.

20:24Right. And this goes for not only the black vote, but just, you know, all voters in general and especially working class voters. If your vote was utterly irrelevant, if this machine was going to churn out whatever results it wants to, then they wouldn't spend this much time and this much effort trying to make sure that you don't go out and vote.

20:46Astead Herndon:And yeah, I think that's been a motivating message. But your point is also to agitate. As you told us the last time you were with us, I saw your speech to the College Democrats of America in July 2026. And I also saw that you wore an outfit reminiscent of the former Chinese communist dictator, which sparked some controversy. You got your suit on today, but those things will find themselves in Republican attack ads and have angered some Democrats. I'm asking about actions like that. Do those things make it harder for Democrats to win in November? No, it's entirely dependent on how they use this opportunity.

21:26I think it's a really, it's ironically a good opportunity, right? Because that's precisely what happened with Abdul Al-Sayed's race as well. but Abdul was so good, just like Zoran was, and just like Zoran still is, at reframing that moment in the spotlight to turn that into a moment where you can deliver your policy platform. The reality of the matter is these things are immaterial. I know that people try to turn them into major points of manufactured outrage and controversy, but I saw the response to the suit that I was wearing. It's a Zhongshan suit. It's not just Mao Zedong, obviously. But you know what you're doing.

22:04You know, for sure. You know good and well what you're doing. I do. And I really love that suit, by the way. I mean, it's tailored. I got it tailored in Shanghai from the family that actually invented the Zhongshan suit. Like it's a, it has a significance for me, but the, the way that people were looking at that, the way that, you know, Facebook boomers were responding to the Fox News comment on that, that news hit was, was very reflective of where Americans are broadly, where the base is broadly, where they, they almost hargoned it back to the Obama tan suit. There was a lot of like Obama tan suit comparisons, but they were like, the president's a pedophile.

22:40Who cares what this one random guy is, is wearing as a suit. And I think most voters are there, but having said that on the other side of it, voters will respond to what they're seeing in the media. So if they're constantly seeing this, there will be as much as there's backlash to the negative coverage all the time from the base that go, OK, enough. Like, we don't care about this guy. Who cares? Talk to us about the real issues. There will definitely be a lot of people who are concerned with it. But I don't believe that that concern is going to cause people to stay home.

23:16Astead Herndon:But the question is not really whether they stay home or does that motivate them to vote for the other candidates that motivate them to vote for Stevens that motivate them to vote for Crowley. No, I don't think that that is what, you know, that's what allowed Haley Stevens to perform as well as she did, especially in comparison to the Gresham Whitmer endorsement and Gary Peters endorsement. Other things matter more. Of course, of course they mattered a lot more. So it's always a calculation, right? It's always a calculation for the campaigns. They poll me in these districts. It's not like these guys are, you know, out in the water, totally blind.

Read the full transcript

23:50They're like, this is song guy.

23:51Astead Herndon:This is an intentional choice around the audience. I think it's pretty clear that progressives think they have a bottom-up message that works. And it's clear that they find candidates like Janet Mills or Haley Stevens inherently kind of ill-fitting for that because of their policies. But it seems less clear to me with someone like Barack Obama, one of the more popular politicians in the party, if not the most popular politician in the country on the Democratic side. But you don't hear progressives talk about Obama-ism with much love. Even El-Sayed was quite critical of how Obama used his time in office.

24:25Astead Herndon:So I wanted to use that as a proxy for this larger kind of debate about the Democrats' direction. Do you think Barack Obama is a good model for the Democrats to follow? Are you talking about Barack Obama on the campaign trail? Or are you talking about Barack Obama, the administrator, the president? Give me a quick answer on the both and how you see those differently. OK, Barack Obama, the campaigner, is fantastic. I mean, that's, you know, hope and change. It was literally the model that I think DSA candidates are somewhat abiding by right now without even recognizing it. And I know that's going to be very problematic of me to say people are going to get very mad at me because they only think about Obama, the competent president.

25:09Right. Obama, the 2008 bailout, Obama with drone strikes and all those.

25:15Astead Herndon:Obama with deportations, like all of those are big leftist critiques. Yeah. And I would never bring up those critiques because I love Barack Hussein Obama because I really want him to start endorsing BSA candidates. And that would do really well for his legacy overall, I think. You know, I so. But what are the parts of Obama, the administrator, that you do think the left is breaking from? No, absolutely. I think that Obama had the popular mandate. The last time any president has had a popular mandate was Barack Obama. And I think there are a good deal of people who feel like that was squandered to a certain degree.

25:53And I think it was an uphill battle with a lot of internal division and a lot of corporate influence as well. Like, that is my most charitable interpretation of events, is a guy who, like, actually understands the situation and did at times stick his neck out. What's the uncharitable version of the Obama reading? The uncharitable version? I'm not going to say anything bad about my man Obama. He has a great three-pointer. He's so handsome. He has so much aura. And I always think about how good it would be if Barack Obama started stumping for left candidates.

26:28Astead Herndon:Let me move on with the rest of my time. I want to ask you about a couple of things that Neera Tandon told us earlier in the week. She says she is committed to a big tent, that vote blue no matter who is something that she believes in no matter what. I wanted to ask, do you share that same commitment? it um broadly yeah i think so i mean there are you know it's obviously if you're asking me about like john fetterman it's like you know there there are people who don't fall into that that big tent uh democratic party uh narrative so i've always been a a big advocate of of of whipping votes and like punishing naysayers i mean i this was a big point that i uh brought up during the biden administration about like punishing kirsten cinema punishing joe mansion like i don't think that I don't think Democrats do that all the time.

27:15And I, I don't think that Democrats are also as invested establishment Democrats are as invested in the vote blue, no matter who paradigm, because it's no longer working as effectively as it used to. Cause you know, sometimes you have insurgents that win. And the reason why I say this is because I'm much more favorable to Crowley in the aftermath of Hong's defeat than Nira has been towards Abdul El-Sayed. And that's the Senate majority.

27:42Astead Herndon:It's much more charitable to the establishment candidates than you think the establishment voices are charitable to the progressives. One million percent. I guess I hear you. I'm saying Neera Tanden says El Syed wins. He campaigned with Hassan Piker. She didn't necessarily love it, but she's going to support him in the general because beating Republicans is what's most important. Would you support a Democratic nominee for president that was, you know, a wash in AIPAC money or who didn't support Medicare for all, but J.D. Vance is on the other side? yeah you're gonna say that this is a cop-out but i'm gonna i'm gonna deliver the same line that i delivered to cnn as well not gonna be a problem why it's like asking me because it's it's the equivalence of it from my position asking if i would support a democratic primary uh candidate that wins that is like super pro israel and a wash and a pack money is like asking will we have a a pro-Second Amendment, pro-gun rights and anti-abortion.

28:37I don't know about that.

28:39Astead Herndon:You know, like, I definitely think the sentiment shift on Israel has been real, but the red lines are not clear across the base. It's not like there's a universal agreement about not selling defensive weapons. There might be a universal agreement that Israel did some bad stuff in Gaza, but it doesn't seem like there is a clarity on the question of solutions. I guess I'm asking, like, it seems possible that the next Democratic nominee is maybe more middle of the road than even some of the midterms candidates we saw. The salience of the electability argument is chipped away every single day, or rather it's being now weaponized more effectively against the establishment because it is the correct argument.

29:18The Bernie would have won, like the Bernie would have won narrative from 2016 has unironically been channeled by a lot, at least in my experience, this is anecdotal, by a lot of people who are older voters who are now coming to terms with that reality, that left populism isn't this scary thing that's electability poison. It's actually quite the opposite. And the more we prove that in the general, the easier this is going to be for us. And especially when it comes to Israel, like I said, I think the Israel issue, there's nuances to the Israel issue as well. But having said that, I think broadly, any kind of like sympathetic approach to Israel in 2028 will be electoral poison.

30:00You won't be able to make it out of the Democratic primary. So it's not even a concern for me at all.

30:04Astead Herndon:Does this confidence hold if El-Sayed doesn't win the general? Yeah, 100 percent. But I don't think that's going to be an issue either. The story of the summer has been the Democratic Civil War. Now that the most important primaries are over, what do you think is the result? You calling it a truce? A truce in what regard? I mean, I voted for Adam Schiff. okay like that's my that's my senator like what are we doing you know this is that's why it's so funny when you know i i have these different forces uh you know there are people to my left who say i'm a sheepdog for the dnc i i you know i'm a i'm a collaborator with the enemy but the broadest message that i hear from uh mainstream outlets that are having these consultants on is that like we are an aberration we are not a part of this movement we've never been a part of this movement.

30:52It's like, we haven't stopped being a part of this movement. What is this movement? Is it the brand of the democratic party or is it what the voters actually want? What we want is for the voters desires to be expressed. What we want is a clear agenda, a clear vision for a better future. And let me tell you something. Okay. After my experience hands-on with some of these campaigns all around the country, I have begun to realize something. I'm ready for this. A big part of the reason why the Democrats never have a bold vision or an agenda is because they have the easiest time hitting the electability argument in the primary and then the harm reduction argument in the general.

31:40I hear you. And I think that was best demonstrated by James Carville's now pivotal New York Times op-ed where he said, like, punish the voters, basically. Let the voters see what it looks like when Republicans are in charge. That was a big part of the reason why we actually were able to seize on this moment and be like, no, see, they're telling you, like, they're telling you they're going to roll over and die. and that's the reason why Chuck Schumer's popularity is in the gutter. That's the reason why Hakeem Jeffries is not nationally popular either and that's because people wanted more. People wanted the Democrats to fight back.

32:15They wanted Democrats to represent them and they lost confidence in the party.

32:19Astead Herndon:I want to untangle what you just said. What the argument you're making is, and I think it's a true one, honestly, is that establishment moderate Democrats over the last couple years or maybe even longer have basically run the same playbook throughout these elections that in the primary and it works it works successfully in the primaries it's about the scary left and how unelectable they are and then the general it's hey we're better than these republicans and at no point to your argument is that really an argument for what they will provide people at no point is that an argument that centers voters and their concerns and it has been clear, and I honestly think Neary even spoke to this, that there is a struggle independently for the moderate establishment lane to speak to the reasons of why Trumpism exists in the first place.

33:05Yeah. And they have no answer for this. And yet we have had an answer for this even before Trumpism became a thing. And that's my argument. We've had the same exact answer since the 90s. We've had the same exact answer since the ironic third-way neoliberal pivot under Bill Clinton, welfare reform, NAFTA, like it's not an accident that the, you know, the broadest base of the white working class, especially left the Democratic Party in droves over the course of those years. Part of that is because labor unions were gutted and destroyed. Manufacturing jobs were shipped overseas. We used to have an industry in this country and the workers, the industrial workers would also go and participate in local politics in very meaningful ways.

33:51They'd have - line from the wire we used to build things here you know like yeah and and that's not like that's that's not a crazy argument it's ironic because i feel like you know trumpism in some respects even down to the the white nativist anti-immigrant agenda is is hearkening back to like the 90s democratic party it's very interesting that they you know present this like totally new right populist uh message but you know down to the trade protectionism and even like the the aggressive posture against migration patterns, you're looking at like a 90s Democrat.

34:26Astead Herndon:Yeah, the positioning is one that is supposed to be populous and sort of sounds like where Democrats used to be. Hassan, thank you for joining us and we'll see you again soon. All right. Thank you for having me. So after talking with Piker again, it's clear that there's not much daylight between moderates and progressives on the question of the Big Ten. Neera Tanden says she'll vote blue no matter who. And Hassan says the same thing. Everyone's in agreement, at least for now. But it's also clear that the left still has an electability burden. The establishment's playbook in Wisconsin worked, and Piker knows that and is adjusting.

35:03Astead Herndon:But my biggest takeaway from a year of democratic civil war? Well, it's a mess. The landscape is still undecided, and both sides, moderates and progressives, have a lot of reasons to feel confident heading into the 2028 presidential primary. So after a year of midterms primary battles, the fight continues. And in some ways, it's really just beginning because the true direction for Democrats probably won't be decided in earnest until that presidential primary kicks off.

35:37Astead Herndon:America actually will be in your feeds every Saturday with an interesting interview in politics or culture. And you can also watch these episodes on the Vox YouTube channel. Just go to youtube.com slash Vox or click the link in the show notes. The best way to support this show is by becoming a Vox member. Members get a bonus segment on Patreon every week and they make our work possible. Go to vox.com slash members to join. That's vox.com slash members to join. This show was edited by Kasha Bersalian, fact check by Esther Gim, and mixed by Shannon Mahoney. Christopher Snyder is our video editor and Kun Nui is our senior art director.

36:15Astead Herndon:Our executive producer is Christina Vallis, and our theme music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. Additional support from Miranda Kennedy, David Tadashore, and Nisha Chital. I'm Estet Herndon, and this is America Actually.

From the publisher

Democrats have been duking it out all summer. He’s at the center of it all.

This show was edited by Kasia Broussalian, fact checked by Esther Gim, mixed by Shannon Mahoney, video edited by Christopher Snyder, and hosted by Astead Herndon.

Hasan Piker at the Vancouver Convention Centre in Vancouver, Canada in 2026. Photo By Florencia Tan Jun/Web Summit via Sportsfile via Getty Images.

You can also watch this episode on youtube.com/vox. Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. New Vox members get $20 off their membership right now.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Today, Explained

All 558 episodes
Hasan Piker’s challenge to the centerToday, Explained · 36 min
Listen in VO