The "I love Hitler" group chat

0:28It's today explained from Vox. a Republican congressman. Allegedly, one of his staffers had something in the background or something in a Zoom. That's what I heard. No, not that one either. The young Republicans and the I love Hitler in the group chat. It's awful. It's revolting. It's disgusting. It's obnoxious. It's also the third time in like seven days. Coming up, do the Republicans have a Nazi problem?

1:00Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

1:5525 Euro monatlich im Leasing plus Sonderzahlung. Und im Showroom steht auch der Rest der Modellpalette bereit. Ab geht's zum Opel Angrillen am Samstag, 24. Januar bei deinem Opel Partner. Mehr auf opel.de

2:19The young Republicans whose text messages Politico got hold of a week ago are not that young, 22 to 40, LOL, and they weren't household names, but up-and-comers, staffers in Republican offices. Andrew Prokop, Vox, what did they say? Where to start? A lot of this was kind of edgy humor in which they were joking about all sorts of taboo topics. There was a lot of talk about Hitler, about gas chambers. There are references to black people as watermelon people. Someone says he doesn't want to watch the NBA because he'd go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball. And then they refer to another young Republican figure who's not in the chat as a, quote, fat, stinky Jew.

3:11So a lot of nasty stuff here. In your piece for Vox, you focused on the antisemitism. How have Republicans, conservatives, responded to the group chat from Hill? Well, there has been a real split in the reaction over this. Disgusting. If they have government jobs, they should be fired. It's reprehensible. Focus on the real issues. Don't focus on what kids say in group chat. Fallout continues for New York's Young Republican chapter as a pivotal vote to disband the group has been approved. I think the insta-reaction from a lot of people was to say, this is unacceptable. This goes too far. We don't want this kind of thing associated with our movement.

3:55And then there's the other reaction, which is basically to rally to their defense to say that, essentially, that we shouldn't care about this because Democrats and the left are so much worse. One thousand times worse. and the loudest and most vocal proponent of that latter view was the vice president of the United States, J.D. Vance, who, of course, decided to weigh in on this. Focusing on what kids are saying in a group chat, grow up. He said he refused to join the pearl clutching over what he called inaccurately a college group chat, repeatedly said the participants were kids and young boys.

4:33And I really don't want us to grow up in a country where a kid telling a stupid joke, telling a very offensive stupid joke is cause to ruin their lives. A really interesting debate has kind of emerged on X and on other social media platforms on the right about whether really should there be a line somewhere? Is enough enough? And is this a sign of a worrying trend that blatant anti-Semitism and bigotry are being normalized among the young right in a way that is worsening and that will have very bad consequences for our society and perhaps for the Republican Party as well? Let's go back in time and talk about whether this is a real shocker.

5:27Is this the first time we've seen this type of anti-Semitism in young conservative circles? What I would say is that this is something that has been brewing, that has been simmering. It's been kind of in the fever swamps of the young right. If you go on message boards like 4chan that have right wing allegiances, this sort of, if you think back to the Charlottesville rally where there were a bunch of relatively young white supremacists chanting things like, You will not replace us! You will not replace us! But this year, there have been a series of what I found to be very notable warnings from prominent right-wing figures that are very closely in touch with trends on the right that they believed this problem was getting worse, and they were worried about it.

6:25Christopher Rufo is, of course, the leading right-wing activist who combated wokeness, critical race theory, very kind of not a moderate figure in really any way. They can use they-them pronouns. They can use it-itself pronouns. They can use frog-frog-self pronouns, for that matter. He wrote in early September an article called The Conservative Movement at a Crossroads. He said that racialism, anti-Semitism and conspiracism were entering some corners of mainstream conservatism and that what he was hearing from Republican staffers was that all three trends have, quote, gained a foothold among their Gen Z colleagues in Washington.

7:12There have been several other posts like this that I've noted this year. A lot of it seems to be about a kind of culture among young right-wingers that's developed where saying extreme and offensive things makes you kind of cool. The commentator Richard Hanania had an article earlier this year where he called this the based ritual. He claims this is a real thing that young MAGA does when they're in social settings. They kind of compete for, like, who can say the most offensive things or express the most extreme views. And what's interesting is in a sort of joking or am I joking really fashion, like there's, you know, of course you're being ironic.

7:58You don't really support Hitler. But, oh, Hitler, you know, he's kind of based. He's maybe kind of cool. But the belief is that this kind of crossed over from what were just like anonymous posters on message boards in the comments who had no power over to low level positions, but inside the administration in Republican Hill offices, that this kind of thinking and behavior was now becoming more common among like the Republican staffer class. And one reason for this, many argue, is the growth of such allegedly anti-Semitic rhetoric and commentary among popular right-wing influencers. Like whom? So there is a spectrum of some certain influencers who are just openly anti-Semitic, anti-just criticized Jews in that term all the time.

8:59This would be like Nick Fuentes. The Jews took over America. They opened the borders. He's been called a white supremacist or a Hitler defender, but he's still pretty far from acceptable among most Republican elite circles. But what's really happened is that this has spread more among this kind of populist, independent influencer class of people who are offering up this commentary, often framed in terms of more conspiracy theories where that often tend to blame Jews or Israelis or Zionists or the Mossad or whoever for various societal problems. But the craziest example of this so far is what unfolded after the killing of Charlie Kirk in September.

9:56And what happened there? So after Kirk was shot, some conservative figures like Rufo immediately seized on this as a pretext to blame the left. And there's been no evidence or assertion that has any validity that any other person or group was involved in this other than Tyler Robinson, the accused killer. So Rufo is trying to blame the left, but then, inconveniently for him, these right-wing influencers start floating a different theory, that maybe the Jews had something to do with it. You know, to be clear, this has no validity or basis whatsoever, but there was actually a complicated backstory about Charlie Kirk and about Israel that has come to light in the month or so since his killing.

10:49Kirk had long been a staunchly pro-Israel conservative. I am a defender of the nation state of Israel to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people. But he was always in touch about where the trends were among the young rights rank and file. He recognized they were increasingly divided over Israel. And he began to feature commentators like Tucker Carlson, who many argue has crossed over into kind of spreading anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in his criticism of Israel. And then in early September, in texts that have since leaked, Charlie Kirk texted some of his allies, Just lost another huge Jewish donor.

11:33Two million dollars a year because we won't cancel Tucker. Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause. and a couple days after that he was murdered so this has been the basis for all of these anti-semitic conspiracy theories about uh israel or jews in some way being involved in charlie kirke's murder uh this is sometimes alluded to in sort of coded fashion at kirke's memorial service tucker carlson compared him to jesus who he said was killed due to quote with a bunch of guys sitting around eating hummus, thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth about us.

12:20We must make him stop talking. Candace Owens, another very popular figure in this podcast slash influencer space on the right has devoted her whole podcast to like trying to suss out supposedly the truth about Kirk's killing. Bibi Netanyahu in that phone call, what took place was a couple of weeks ago before Charlie lost his life. She's the one who actually first published these leaked texts, which have been confirmed to be authentic. And so as Tucker and Candace have increasingly pushed these conspiracy theories, there's been pushback. And others on the right have said, is enough enough? Like, should we keep associating with these people?

13:09Have they gone too far or should they be, you know, denounced, shunned, disavowed? And there are very different views on this. people say you know they've crossed over into complete anti-semitic uh nonsense they've been completely lost to reality and and cut them loose a coalition like firing people who say bigoted things denouncing people with extreme views de-platforming uh have really lost favor among many on the right because they're viewed as kind of the way that that the left weaponizes um you know, censorship against the right. And they don't want to support censorship. And so they are basically saying, you know, we can't do anything except stand aside while these groups and these ideas continue to gain influence.

14:03We'll try to argue against them to persuade people otherwise. But they have not been doing such a great job of it so far.

14:18Andrew Prokop, Vox.com. Coming up, what's the worst thing you've ever said in a group chat? And honestly, did you mean it literally? You did not. And so we're going to ask, should we give these guys a break? Devil's Avocado, ahead.

14:47Every corner of your life, your feed, your group chat, even your barista. But here's the thing. Advice isn't therapy. Therapy is therapy. And if you're looking to start therapy with licensed professionals, Grow Therapy is there to help. Grow can connect you with thousands of independent licensed therapists across the country, offering both virtual and in-person sessions. You can search therapists by what matters most to you, like insurance, specialty, identity, or availability, and get started in as little as two days. And if something comes up, you can cancel up to 24 hours in advance at no cost.

15:24Grow says there are no subscriptions and no long-term commitments. You just pay per session. Whatever challenges you're facing, Grow Therapy is here to help. Sessions average about$21 with insurance, and some pay as little as$0, depending on their plan. Visit growththerapy.com slash explained to get started. That's growththerapy.com slash explained. Growththerapy.com slash explained. Availability and coverage vary by state and insurance plan.

15:59Support for this show comes from American Giant. What's your favorite item of clothing? A lot of people may say it's something formal, like the perfect suit or cocktail dress. But in our heart of hearts, most people know that their favorite item of clothing is their hoodie. And American Giant says that their classic full-zip hoodie is made to last a lifetime. Slate magazine even called it the greatest hoodie ever made. And from cotton to zipper, it's made right here in the USA. Our colleague, Andrew Malnazik, tried out American Giant. I was super lucky enough to have American Giant send me some of their clothing from their site.

16:36People used to say to me all the time, invest in quality materials and goods. And American Giant's clothing has reminded me that, hey, they were probably right. This season, you can snag the hoodie that will bring you comfort for life. The American Giant Classic Full Zip. And save 20 % off your first order at American-Giant.com when use code EXPLAINED at checkout. That's American-Giant.com and use code EXPLAINED at checkout. That's 20 % off your first order at American-Giant.com. Code EXPLAINED.

17:14Support for today's show comes from Rubrik. Many companies are deploying AI agents at this time. They automate tasks, they handle workflows, they make decisions. And here is the thing. Sometimes, according to Rubric, they mess up. They might delete the wrong file. They might make changes you didn't authorize. They might go off script. When that happens, you can get stuck trying to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. Enter Rubric Agent Cloud. Rubric Agent Cloud is a platform that they say lets you monitor, govern, and rewind AI agent actions. It's one platform. They say it helps you use more agents faster and without the risk.

17:56They say it runs in the background. They say it watches what's happening. They say it makes sure things stay on track. They say you can get full visibility. They say you can set guardrails so the agents don't go rogue. If your business relies on AI agents, you need the ability to monitor, govern, and rewind their actions, says Rubrik. Right now, our listeners get exclusive early access to Rubrik Agent Cloud. You can go to rubrik.com. That's r-u-b-r-i-k dot com, rubric dot com.

18:31I'm afraid that if I subscribed to something like internet, you would really be hooked. I would get hooked and I would never, you know, spend time with... Today Explained. Okay, my name is Jamie Cohen and I am an associate professor of media studies at CUNY Queens College in New York. You spend a lot of time studying memes, I'm told. Yes, I actually, I tell people I have a PhD in memes, but I really have a doctorate in visual culture and online propaganda, I guess is the way to think of it. But yes, memes are my main focus of study. Yes. Why do you think those young Republicans were saying what they were saying?

19:07I think they've normalized this speech in their communities. It's sort of the way that we code switch into our group chats. We each have our own type of language when we talk to each other. And the sites and places that they communicate or find themselves around online are speaking like this. And so they're just dragging that type of language into their group chats. Yes. And then that brings us to the question of if you think that talking this way is normal, whether you really mean it. And we're not inside their heads. We don't know if they really mean it. But one way of determining whether they really mean it is to ask, is this exclusive to young people on the right?

19:46There is a space where people, anybody, tests the people around them by using speech. The Overton window is the overall borderlands of acceptable speech. But I think each person who holds their ideologies, whether they're left ideologies or right ideologies, tests people by using language that are pretty specific to their space and ideology. And so in these cases, you often hear these words to see if somebody pushes back or not. And if nobody pushes back, you know that that's an acceptable form of speech inside those communities. So it isn't always ideologically to the right. It is ideologically to what is an in-group or what you find as a sense of belonging.

20:25So it's the way that we test each other to figure it out. All right. So we are talking about the young Republicans and their leaked chat. You will know that Jay Jones, a Democrat who's running for attorney general in Virginia, said in some texts that he seemed to think were private. He fantasized about killing Virginia's Republican state House speaker and about the deaths of that Republican's children. A person who is very politically powerful, who is about to become one of the most powerful law enforcement officers in the country. That person seriously wishing for political violence and political assassination is one thousand times worse than what a bunch of young people, a bunch of kids say in a group chat, however offensive it might be.

21:07That's just reality. What do we take from the example of Jay Jones? What does he tell us? So this example is interesting because the difference here is the young Republicans aren't running for office. They may hold positions in their state. But when you're running for attorney general, you really are the person who's kind of responsible for that type of justice. And so that type of speech, I think there's like that sentence of like, wisdom consists of the anticipation of consequences. And when you're running for that position, being inconsequential about that in that speech is irresponsible. And he said he was embarrassed and sorry for what he said.

21:41I'm ashamed. I'm embarrassed. And I'm sorry. But really, that is also abhorrent speech and it falls under what would be considered threat. And that isn't protected by our First Amendment rights. OK, so what I'm hearing from you is that everybody is behaving badly in the chats. And by everybody, I don't obviously literally mean everybody. But I myself have said things in private group chats. Nothing along these lines, I assure you and our listeners, that I would not want anyone to see. This makes me, Jamie, open to the idea that a group chat is essentially harmless. We talk this way in private, but we don't act on this.

22:21And we live in 2025. Everyone has the group chat and everybody is trying to impress their friends with the clever or salty or spicy things that they say. but we need to remember that it's not real life. What do you think about that? In the past several years, probably the last decade, we've replaced community into these digital spaces. We're allowed to be more free inside of them. And I think, to be clear, if we lose that freedom, then we've lost connectivity.

22:53We do need an ability to express ourselves freer with our group chats in terms of like private spaces, in terms of like what we would consider community should have the ability to have a flexibility of language that is acceptable among friends. That is how it is. And that's where nuance and like, if you're a friend of somebody, you understand their intonation. So those gray areas are part of how we moderate space in general. So it isn't like a danger that translates from text directly to action. That is completely different. Text to action takes many, many years. I think where I feel this happens is that when you normalize any type of slow violence, meaning like these are just jokes at this point, when you normalize that amongst a group of friends, sometimes the borders of your group chat spill out into real life.

23:37You forget who you're talking to. You've normalized it so much in your head that your filters have been worn down. And I think that's where the borderlands become soft. And I worry about that with internet culture in general because so many people that consider themselves extremely online or very online since the pandemic have sort of lost the idea of what the filter is between like their online friends and how they communicate to their parents, to their friends offline or in classes. To be honest, I've heard things that come out of their mouth, which result in a little bit of a red face. So I think sometimes that normalcy creates an accidental okayness that isn't with the right in-group.

24:19And, you know, another argument you heard is that these were young Republicans who were like chair of the Young Republicans in Kansas City and New York. Like you look at their online profiles, these are not particularly charismatic people. They don't seem as if they are bound for greatness. And so maybe, and you know, we've heard conservatives make this argument, they are people at the lower echelon who weren't really headed anywhere. And therefore, it's not so much to worry about. What do you think about that? I would ask where J.D. Vance was in the echelon 10 years ago. If you assume that he was in the lower echelons of politics a decade ago, coming off of a book deal and telling his story, and 10 years ago today being fairly anti-Trump.

25:03Trump is a really bad candidate, and frankly, I think a really bad person. And then figuring his way into a point where today he uses Twitter and his accounts quite aggressively with his language. And in the defense of these text messages, it just tells you that, yes, at this point, they may be lower echelon in their speech, but there's a likely trajectory of them moving up to potentially the vice presidency or the presidency itself. Yeah. Vance is a fascinating case because he is young. He's a millennial. He's a member of the emo community. Fade Into You by Mazzy Starr is probably like my favorite song of the entire 90s rock era.

25:39He almost certainly will run for president in 2028. And he is defending this. This man who's very ambitious, who would probably like to be president someday, is the loudest voice saying, this is no big deal. That's really striking. What do we take from that? I guess it surprised me the most when the vice president replied in a quote tweet to the Krasensteins. I don't give a shit what you call it. When the Krasensteins called out the Trump administration's bombing of a Venezuelan boat, a war crime. And it was shocking to me because the vice president is a very online character, but the Krasensteins are well known as reply guys, very popular reply guys on Twitter X space.

26:20And they clap back. That's their main goal is they speak directly back to politicians and try to get that type of attention. So they're popular. They're popular figures. And I thought to myself, in what part of history, at least modern history, would you hear a vice president saying that to a citizen? That would be considered something that would be a gaffe or something that would be so problematic. I mean, I grew up when Dan Quell misspelled potato. Yep. So it was... Weeks of coverage. Yeah. So I was fascinated by that level of aggressive mockery of somebody just saying something on Twitter or an ex and how much that type of speech has become normalized, not just by politics, but by culture and media as well.

27:03I do believe that Vance is speaking when he talks about this or covers for these young Republicans. I feel in many ways he's speaking towards the future of the party that he is likely to or imagines himself to inherit. And in that way, we're kind of seeing what the new baseline, the bottom is the normalcy of that lower level as it's going to become something more aggressive in the future. People still see the internet as another place. But J.D. Vance and this chat group shows that like, the internet is everywhere and internet culture is running our politics and our culture at this point. And we have to really pay very close attention to how J.D.

27:38Vance speaks because he may be speaking to his echo chamber, but he is expecting that chamber to get much larger and encompass everything around us.