Trump evicts homeless people

0:00The takeover of Washington, D.C. by the President Donald Trump continues this week. We got ICE officers detaining delivery drivers across the city. We got federal police officers from multiple agencies, including the FBI, dealing with a drunk woman in DuPont Circle. And on Wednesday morning, a 14-ton, mine-resistant military vehicle crashed into a car in Capitol Hill. A civilian basically got T-boned by a tank. But somewhere in the background, the president of the United States is also trying to evict D.C.'s homeless population. This has long been an obsession of his. We can't let homeless stay in the middle of our magnificent parks under the Washington monument and other places.

0:45We're going to clean up Washington and D.C. and we're going to make it a crime-free zone. There's not going to be any crime. We're going to have laws, but we're going to have to take it over. We're going to evaluate the job he's doing with the unhoused on Today Explained from Vox. Christmas and Christmas are over, there comes the next tradition to the end. That big Opel-angrilling is definitely at your partner. With music, and in the showroom is also the rest of the model-plug. Up to the Opel-angrilling on Saturday, 24. January at your partner. More on opel.de.

1:32Wow! Washington, D.C. Today Explained, Sean Ramos from here with Kyle Swenson, who reports on D.C. for WAPO. We asked him to help us understand what this administration has been up to as it concerns people without homes in our nation's capital. Really beginning on Thursday night was the first night where there was a concerted effort to move to the city through places where homeless people had typically gathered where they were tents. Under the direction of the federal government, D.C. police led the clearing of homeless encampments. The White House says that people who do not leave could be thrown in jail.

2:09And what we're seeing is an increase of homeless encampment removals. We're just people. We're normal people out here working, trying to do well. I remember the passage of, as you have done unto the least of these, you have done unto me. And the idea that he's targeting us and persecuting us feels wrong to me. Now, whether those have produced arrests, at this point, we're still trying to figure that out. We don't know. Do we know where people went, or is this part of the mystery here? We don't necessarily know where they went. I've spoken to a few people who were living out there. A couple of them have just moved on to different parts of the city.

2:53A couple just went in the woods. Honestly, they just are now trying to get more out of sight and get out of the kind of laser focus of authorities, which is understandable. And the city has increased its shelter capacity. This is also something we're trying to kind of lock down. It's still in flux. But a lot of people don't want to go into shelter. for a lot of understandable reasons. When you kind of get down in the nitty-gritty, they maybe don't feel safe in a shelter. They maybe have too much stuff. There's a two-bag rule when you go into a shelter, you can take two bags in. So if your whole life is packed up in six bags, maybe you don't want to go into a shelter.

3:32Some people with animals, some people with health conditions, if they're going in and out of medical treatments, like dialysis every day, they maybe don't feel like they have the flexibility in a shelter where you have to be in by a certain time. So a lot of people are very skeptical of the shelter system, and that's why they kind of remain on the street.

3:57so if people are indeed just heading into the woods it isn't like this is a problem that's been solved because the second the tension is released or the focus drifts elsewhere we can assume people are just going to come right back to the services and the neighborhoods that are familiar and we're working for them can you give us a sense of the like at least the recent history around this issue in a city like Washington, D.C.? Yeah, I mean, one of the things about Trump's kind of like picture and the rhetoric around this is that the city he's kind of talking about doesn't seem like the city right now in terms of homelessness.

4:35It seems like post-pandemic, I think anybody who was here would note there were large encampments all over the city of homeless people. If he came out from the DuPont metro, DuPont Circle was ringed with tents. From Scott Circle to DuPont Circle, GW to Georgetown, homeless encampments are now nestled across our nation's capital. McPherson Square, five minutes from the White House, was the district's largest encampment. Many residents say they feel the world has turned its back on them. Now the city, Mayor Bowser's administration, you know, they have been very active on this issue. They have both included services going out to people.

5:15They have opened up the number of vouchers for people who get long-term housing. And we open smaller service and rich centers across all eight wards. We open the new 801-E shelter for men. We open the city's first LGBTQ plus shelter. But they also have cleared encampments pretty regularly. So the city has been on it. They've been moving people off these big encampments. Right now, there's a list of encampment clearings that the city schedules. They post it. They try to go through a protocol where they reach out immediately with social workers and people to offer services to people living in that area.

5:55But last week, I went to a lot of the places that were lined up on upcoming sweeps, and there's just nobody there. The idea that there's tent cities in Washington, D.C. right now is just not accurate compared to other cities that you see out west and stuff like that. And so when President Trump talks about these large encampments that are kind of like despoiling the city, he's kind of talking about something that doesn't exist in the city anymore as far as we can tell. And as far as the city can tell, we still have homeless people, 100%. This is a major American city.

6:30We saw big spikes over the past two years. And then this year, during the census of homeless individuals, people unhoused, we saw a drop by about 9%. So that's actually a pretty significant victory for the city. Mayor Bowser's administration, you know, is very correct to take credit for that. They've made a lot of inroads and outreach. But then a lot of what we're seeing is also, like, in the counties surrounding D.C., like Montgomery, the numbers have gone up. So does anyone think Donald Trump's going to solve this? In my opinion, having covered this for a long time, This feels like a show of force in an area where a show of force isn't going to actually solve this issue.

7:14And one other thing to really point out here is that the White House is taking a stand on a particular kind of philosophical position about how to deal with homelessness. Right. You've written that some of these approaches the Trump administration would like to take are influenced by this conservative think tank called the Cicero Institute. What is their philosophy to deal with homelessness? Right. So, you know, Cicero is based in Texas and they have lobbied very effectively in a lot of Republican states to pass kind of criminalization efforts. What I attempted to accomplish was a ban on illegal camping statewide in Kentucky.

7:55They're usually disguised as camping bans and things like that or loitering bans, but it makes it very aggressive where police can roll up to anybody who doesn't seem to be housed or seem to be sleeping somewhere, and there's a criminal penalty to them. They have a bill in place where basically the policeman can say you need to move along to a designated camping area or you need to go to a shelter or rehab or we can take you to jail. But the idea kind of runs against this wall because, you know, it's even hard to get a bed for like a detox center in this country. It's really hard to get mental health access.

8:28So they mean well. It's just their philosophy is this kind of like forcing people. They should know what's good for them. They should get into treatment. They should better themselves. Where studies have shown this other philosophy, which is now the prevailing philosophy. And it's been the prevailing philosophy for the last 20 years, which is housing first. which is you get somebody in a house, if you get them housed to a permanent place, this is my house. I got my lock on my door. I got my keys. Like that actually is the first step to a person stabilizing and being like, maybe I need mental health treatment.

8:59Maybe I need drug treatment. But it's the first step is just get them in their own place. It's kind of about establishing dignity. And that is a very delicate process. It's hard. There's a lot of trial and error there. but what Cicero has effectively very much so pushed in a lot of states is the opposite. It's to criminalize, to kind of use the stick rather than the carrot around these issues. And the Trump administration is very clear about where they stand on this. They very much embrace that same attitude. And Housing First has even become kind of like, not as much so, but in the same way, like DEI, it's become kind of like one of these buzzwords that is loaded now with the significance of like a failed policy idea.

9:41And we're seeing the fruits of that play out in D.C. very specifically. And does something called involuntary commitment also factor into this sort of stick instead of carrot approach? Totally. I mean, that is the most extreme stick that can be used.

10:01Involuntary commitment being is that you're deemed by law enforcement to be a danger to yourself or to the community and you literally are removed from the street for a psychiatric hold. It plays out differently in every kind of state and jurisdiction. That is the most extreme measure that can be used against homelessness. We have not seen it in D.C. so far, as far as we know, play out. But that is definitely something that's in the conversation here with people who want to take a harder line on the homeless.

10:36You can read Kyle at WashingtonPost.com. More on the most extreme stick that can be used to deal with homelessness and the surprising corners of this country that agree on using said stick when we're back on Today Explained.

11:01support for the show today comes from none other than hymns erectile dysfunction can make you feel like you aren't yourself hymns says they could help you get back to the best version of you with personalized ed treatments that are prescribed by licensed providers including daily meds that support more spontaneous moments. Sounds fun. HIMSS says they offer access to ED treatment options, including trusted generics that cost 95 % less than brand names if prescribed. And since HIMSS is 100 % online, you can get the care you need from the comfort of your own home. No sitting around under fluorescent lights, reading a week's old magazine while you wait for an appointment.

11:39Remember magazines? You can get simple online access to personalized, affordable care for ED, hair loss, weight loss, and more by visiting HIMSS.com slash explain. That's HIMSS.com slash explained for your free online visit. HIMSS.com slash explained. Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan. Featured products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness, or quality. Prescription required. See website for details, restrictions, and important safety information.

12:10Support for the show comes from BoxyCat. There's a lot to love about having a cat in your home. But there's one thing that even the most ardent cat lover could do without. Stinky litter boxes. Boxy says that they can help. Boxy wants to be the last kitty litter you ever try. They say the difference is in their formula, which includes probiotics that can stop bacteria that cause odors. Plus, Boxy says their clumping power is superior, making it easier to scoop so your litter box can be less stinky without any of the fake fragrances. Here's our colleague, Andrew Melnizik, to tell us more. So my sister is that cat mom.

12:47She calls them her children. So when it comes to trying anything new for them, she's incredibly skeptic and always a little hesitant. That's why I was so excited to hear that she was really enjoying Boxy's cat litter. The first thing she noticed, there was just zero issues transitioning to cats. There was no drama from them, which, you know, cats can kind of push back and be a little bit drama. It was really a miracle. If you're tired of switching litters, looking for the one? Get Boxy at B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com. It's the last letter you'll switch to. Enjoy 30 % off with code EXPLAINED at BoxyCat.com slash EXPLAINED.

13:27That's B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com forward slash EXPLAINED.

13:38Support for today's show comes from Rubrik. Many companies are deploying AI agents at this time. They automate tasks, they handle workflows, they make decisions. And here is the thing. Sometimes, according to Rubric, they mess up. They might delete the wrong file. They might make changes you didn't authorize. They might go off script. When that happens, you can get stuck trying to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. Enter Rubric Agent Cloud. Rubric Agent Cloud is a platform that they say lets you monitor, govern, and rewind AI agent actions. It's one platform. They say it helps you use more agents faster and without the risk.

14:20They say it runs in the background. They say it watches what's happening. They say it makes sure things stay on track. They say you can get full visibility. They say you can set guard rails so the agents don't go rogue. If your business relies on AI agents, you need the ability to monitor, govern, and rewind their actions, says Rubrik. Right now, our listeners get exclusive early access to Rubrik Agent Cloud. You can go to rubrik.com. That's R-U-B-R-I-K.com, rubrik.com.

14:58So I'm Alex Barnard, and I'm an assistant professor of sociology at New York University. And you've written books, I'm told. Yeah, I wrote a book about California's involuntary treatment system. I joke that it's a book about Britney Spears, but it's more broadly about how conservatorship functions in California. And weirdly, this figures into what's going on right now in Washington, D.C. with the unhoused population. Right. So President Trump has been just issued an executive order that's trying to change the way the U.S. approaches homelessness and mental illness, largely by bringing us back to a more heavy handed coercive approach to homelessness through the mental health system combined with greater criminalization of this population.

15:41And his executive order is not just about the District of Columbia. No, it's the executive order is nationwide. So it's trying to change policy really around three different issues. So first, it's trying to expand the use of civil commitments. So that's involuntary mental health treatment. It's usually reserved for people who are a danger to themselves, danger to others, or unable to meet their basic needs. And he's looking to expand that. It's not totally clear how he's going to do that, because that's determined by state law. But in any case, That's one of his objectives. The second is to expand the criminalization of homelessness, so increase the use of things like encampment sweeps to force people who are homeless to move along.

16:23It's not really clear where he imagines those people going, but that's certainly what they're doing in D.C. There are many places that they can go, and we're going to help them as much as you can help. And then the final piece is a really dramatic change in housing policy. So since George W. Bush, The kind of primary response we have to unsheltered homelessness, for which there's a lot of really robust evidence, is called Housing First. And we created this Housing First program in 92, and we began basically to take people from the streets into an apartment of their own. Housing First speaks about immediate access to permanent housing, and it was adopted as federal policy for the first time under President George W.

17:07Bush. And they want to move away from that towards a system in which housing is not given. It's earned based on your participation in rehab programs or something like that. I think most people are familiar with the idea of like an encampment sweep. And it's probably not surprising to people that Donald Trump's push to solve homelessness in D.C. doesn't have a lot to do with, like, say, building housing for poor people. But the civil commitments thing, I feel like people might not know as much about. So let's focus on that for a second here. What motivated the president of the United States to call for more involuntary commitments?

17:52So this is one of those things that, for whatever reason, Trump has a bit of a fixation on. So in 2018, in response to the Parkland shooting, rather than talking about gun control, he wanted to talk about bringing back asylums, bringing back large psychiatric hospitals that were really significantly downsized in the 1960s. So we're going to be talking seriously about opening mental health institutions again, in some cases reopening. So, you know, we closed a lot of hospitals, but civil commitment never went away. Over a million Americans are subjected to some kind of involuntary psychiatric treatment per year.

18:28That often starts with a law enforcement officer seeing somebody in the community who's not doing well and bringing them to an ER for evaluation. And then that person can be placed in a hospital and medicated involuntarily. So that's that's civil commitment. It's a state by state. You know, the laws for that vary by state, but it exists everywhere. and his vision is that we should ramp up civil commitments to deal with homelessness. We really don't have robust evidence that civil commitment is a good solution to homelessness and in fact there's some recent research that came out that suggests somebody being placed in a psychiatric hospital actually may increase their risk of losing housing because they're in a psychiatric hospital which means they're not going to their job, they're not connecting to family.

19:11If the problem leading to unsheltered homelessness was that there wasn't enough civil commitments, we would see a really different pattern of civil commitments nationwide. So Oklahoma and Utah, for example, are two states with very low levels of civil commitments and almost very little homelessness. So the story there is not that we're not forcing enough mentally ill people into treatment. The story is that there's a lot of cheap housing in those states. And as a result, you're not seeing the kind of unsheltered homelessness that you see in New York or California. California actually has a much higher rate of civil commitments than the national average and also is home to one half of the unsheltered homeless population.

19:48I'm sorry, before we continue, did you just say that half of the nation's unsheltered people live in California? That's correct. I did not know that statistic. It makes sense, but also, wow. It's a catastrophic failure. And I think that it does kind of bring disgrace upon the governments of these left-leaning coastal states that, you know, despite, you know, years and years of policy conversations around this, they have not really moved the needle on homelessness. I'm glad you brought up California, because I think it gets at something interesting when it comes to involuntary commitments here, which is that it isn't just like a left, right, red, blue issue in the United States.

20:31I mean, Donald Trump said this thing, signed this executive order. And then like, I think days later, Almost instantly, it felt like Eric Adams was saying like, we're asking state lawmakers to extend the lifeline of involuntary commitment to those struggling with serious addiction. We have already made it easier to use involuntary commitment to help people with untreated severe mental illness get care. Mind you, Eric Adams, I guess, no longer a Democrat. But who agrees with Donald Trump that we could stand to see more of these kinds of involuntary civil commitments, whatever they might be? I think Donald Trump is trying to put forward the most cruel possible version of a policy shift that actually has pretty broad support.

21:14So with some research assistance here at NYU, we've cataloged 1 ,900 bills around involuntary treatment that have been introduced in state legislatures in the last decade. And of the 10 states that introduced the most bills on this topic, nine of them voted for Democrats in the last presidential elections. So this has been largely an initiative that is coming from blue coastal states. And what we've seen is that there's been almost a reframing of coercion as a form of compassion, that actually to be a progressive is not to let somebody die in their feces on the street, but to force that person into treatment that they can't necessarily accept.

21:51If in fact they're suicidal, if in fact they're unable to care for themselves, this will allow the judge to better assess whether that person should be committed into drug treatment. When people get their meds, when people get support, we know we can turn people's lives around. This is eminently solvable. Governors like Gavin Newsom have also embraced encampment sweeps and other kind of criminalization measures as another way to deal with urban disorder and homelessness. So in a lot of ways, the blue states have paved the way for this executive order, which is pushing this movement towards a more institutional response to homelessness even further.

22:28And is it controversial, like on the left? Is it creating division in progressive circles that we need to solve this problem and to do so we have to do this thing that some of us find distasteful? So this has been an area that often puts civil liberties groups and disability rights groups in pretty open conflict with other progressive, sometimes elected officials, mayors particularly, also some clinicians and a lot of families that see their loved ones not able to accept the treatment that we think they need. I think in reality, to really move forward on this policy discussion, we need to realize that people who are experiencing homelessness are a really diverse group.

23:10And for the vast majority of them, including many of them with severe mental illness, giving them an apartment is the fastest way to solve their homelessness. But there is a subset of people for whom voluntary services and, you know, independent apartment where a case manager checks you once a week, but otherwise you're left on your own, that that actually isn't going to be enough to meet those individuals' needs. And it's that group that now the right is really focusing on and treating as the entire homelessness population, these people who need to be coerced into treatment because they're so sick.

23:43You know, you joke that your book is about Britney Spears, who, of course, famously had this conservatorship controversy. But is there a story that you've come across or that you tell in your book about involuntary commitment that can help people wrap their heads around the issue? One of my favorite stories, and this is a story of somebody who consented for me to tell his story. His name was Serge. He had no hands and was missing one eye as a result of an accident when he was younger and had lived with schizophrenia. And he spent a decade homeless in Hollywood. And again, this is one of these people where probably, you know, a thousand times a day, somebody was walking by and saying, why isn't somebody doing anything for this guy?

24:28And in reality, he was being picked up by the police and either thrown in jail or taken to an ER dozens and dozens of times. And every time they'd just kick him back out and sometimes they'd pay for an Uber to send him back to Hollywood. In the end, it was a private citizen, Carrie Morrison, who was charged with the business improvement district there, who said, you know, what is going on here? And she actually convened a meeting of all the stakeholders, everyone who was touching on this person, this person's case, and brought them all together. and they kind of hatched a plan to get this guy into treatment longer term.