Trump's Epstein problem

16 Jul 2025 · 26 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Today, Explained - "Trump's Epstein Problem"

Episode Overview

  • Title: Trump's Epstein Problem
  • Description: Discusses the complexities and political implications surrounding the Epstein files and President Trump's connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Hosts: Sean Rameswaram and David Weigel.
  • Produced by: Hady Mawajdeh and Denise Guerra.
  • Edited by: Miranda Kennedy.
  • Fact-Checked by: Laura Bullard.

Key Themes and Discussions

The Demand for Epstein Files

  • Political Pressure: A growing chorus of politicians and public figures, including Congressman Hank Johnson and Speaker Mike Johnson, are calling for the release of Epstein-related documents.
  • Public Sentiment: There is a widespread belief among Americans that the Epstein files contain information that should be made public, especially given the high-profile nature of Epstein's connections.

Trump's Complicated Relationship with Epstein

  • Historical Ties: Trump has a longstanding relationship with Epstein, which complicates his position when advocating for the release of the files. Trump stated he had not spoken to Epstein in years, which raises skepticism among voters and media alike.
  • Dichotomy in Perception: While Trump is viewed as an outsider by his supporters, his ties to Epstein and the political elite create contradictions in his narrative.

Democrats vs. Republicans

  • Opportunistic Politics: Both parties appear to be leveraging the Epstein issue for political gain. Democrats see an opportunity to critique Trump, while Republicans attempt to navigate the backlash from their base demanding transparency.
  • Risk Assessment: The conversation highlights how Democrats feel less at risk regarding connections to Epstein and are willing to publicly push for file releases.

Public and Media Reaction

  • Media's Role: The media continues to search for implications and revelations from the Epstein files, reflecting public frustration over the lack of transparency from the Department of Justice (DOJ).
  • Disappointment with Trump: There is a notable sense of betrayal among Trump's supporters regarding his handling of the Epstein situation, and questions loom about whether this will affect voter turnout in future elections.

DOJ's Stance on the Files

  • Policy Limitations: The DOJ has a longstanding policy of not releasing closed investigative files, which complicates the situation. Former prosecutor Ellie Honig discusses the historical context of this policy.
  • Pam Bondi's Role: Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi's inconsistent messaging regarding the Epstein files raises eyebrows. Critics question her intentions and the effectiveness of her role in the DOJ.

The Future of the Epstein Files

  • Potential Outcomes: Discussions contemplate whether the files will ever be completely released or if partial disclosures will occur, likely leading to further public dissatisfaction.
  • Political Implications: The episode concludes by reflecting on the potential impact of the Epstein file situation on future elections, including the 2028 presidential race.

Key Takeaways

  • Complex Political Landscape: The Epstein scandal intertwines with broader political narratives affecting both Republican and Democratic strategies.
  • Public Frustration: There is an urgent demand from the public for transparency, yet institutional barriers hinder true accountability.
  • Trust Issues: The episode illustrates a growing distrust in political figures, including Trump, particularly from his core supporters, as expectations clash with reality.

Closing The episode encapsulates the intricate relationship between politics, public demand for transparency, and the implications of historical connections to controversial figures such as Jeffrey Epstein. The discussions reflect a pivotal moment in political discourse as both parties navigate the fallout of this complex issue.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00It was early this week when Congressman Hank Johnson, Democrat from Georgia's fourth, dropped a parody version of Dreamsicle by Jason Isbell.

0:17Awful. The congressman was adding his voice to an ever-growing chorus. Just a day before him, a rapper named Tyson James dropped a bop called Epstein List. We want the names of every pedophile on that list. You siding with the devil when you say it don't exist. Hey, Trump, wear that list. And last night, none other than the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, followed suit, but not with bars. I mean, the White House and the White House team are privy to facts that I don't know. I mean, this isn't my lane. I haven't been involved in that. But I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there.

0:50Why everyone, except maybe the president himself, hmm, seems to agree that we should see the Epstein files on Today Explained.

1:00Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com.

1:40Support for this show comes from Rocket Money. There are very few easy things about managing your money. How many subscriptions is too many subscriptions? How do I create an easy and effective budget? How do I keep track of all my accounts? Should I just hoard all my cash and bury it in the backyard? With so many ways to mismanage your money, sometimes it feels like the easiest thing to do is just ignore it. But that's where Rocket Money comes in. It tracks your spending, your accounts, and your subscriptions all in one place and makes managing your money actually easier than pretending it doesn't exist.

2:15Try Rocket Money for free at rocketmoney.com slash Vox.

2:23Mr. President, do you have any reaction to today's play being named the best news show? Wow. I didn't know that. I just, you're telling me now for the first time. I'm Sean Ramos from, and this is David Weigel, who covers politics for Semaphore, including the latest Epstein drama. I'm hesitating on where to start because it it in the minds of people who are really interested in this story, it touches on everything. It is as Steve Bannon was telling attendees of Turning Point USA Student Summit last weekend. Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments and who's work and who is working with him on our intelligence apparatus.

3:10and in our government. The hold this has had on the minds of a lot of Americans is long and deep and serious. And it has now kind of cannonballed into our politics as something Republicans are opportunistically trying to downpedal and Democrats are opportunistically trying to hype. But they can do all this because there are many Americans who think it's odd that this sex trafficker, one, got away with what he was doing for so long, two, died in prison, which is quite hard to do without committing suicide in prison there. Famously, very hard to do, and he, according to the government, pulled it off.

3:54And that he allegedly had, according to the Trump administration, evidence on a lot of people that no one can see. Before we go any further, I want to get this out of the way. Do we know, David, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that what's in these files would even satisfy all the people who would like to see them. Well, no, people will not be satisfied by this. And they will not be satisfied by anything less than, I would say, the most lurid fantasies of what is in this information. For example, as soon as the DOJ memo went out over a holiday weekend without an author on it, I was seeing fake videos of Hillary Clinton entering Epstein's jail.

4:35I am hearing breaking news. More of the surveillance footage has been released. I knew it. Oh, it's always the pantsuits. She's so stealthy. That's how you know it's her. You can get a sort of fabricated satisfaction. Will you get total satisfaction that the people that you thought were behind all this all along? Probably not. This is a theme with Trump's campaign. So there are people who voted for Trump in 2016 thinking that one, he was going to put Hillary Clinton in jail to the crimes he was going to convict her of were just an unbelievable litany of murders and conspiracies and drug trafficking from Arkansas.

5:16And the fact that that didn't come out, that it wasn't provable, that didn't happen. There are people who moved on and didn't talk a lot about it. And there are people who will believe until they die that The elites cover this up. Donald Trump makes for a bit of an awkward messenger in this mission to release the Epstein files, considering unlike, I don't know, say like Kamala Harris, he has a long history and established friendship with the late New York financier Jeffrey Epstein. Yes, you've pinpointed the irony of this entire story. And I talked to some Democrats over the over the last few days about why they didn't make hay of his connections to Jeffrey Epstein in 2016 and 2020 and 2024, because Democrats just decided that Trump is inoculated by his connection to his base.

6:12Generally speaking, they're happy this week to focus on Epstein because the metanarrative of Trump is that he's a political outsider who knows all these people backwards and forwards. The elite. The elite. Why are they elite? I have a much better apartment than they do. And the metanarrative specifically for Trump among his voters was, yeah, Donald Trump's on the record saying he knows Jeff Epstein. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. Yeah, he's on these videos and photos of him. However, the problem that ran into around the Epstein story is that Kash Patel.

6:53And to me, that's a thing I think President Trump should run on. On day one, roll out the Black Book. Dan Bongino. Listen, that Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal. Please do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this. And all these people said things during the campaign as people who were not guaranteed to be administration that would be proven. And they weren't. And this is the best ammunition that Democrats have had the last week is video of these guys saying they're going to release this Epstein information once they get their hands on it. You can find this already. Conservatives and let's say other anti-politics, anti-establishment voters who voted for Trump, they're still they want to be faithful in Trump and believe that he's going to do the right thing.

7:35These other guys are dispensable. You could see that the story was turning from people being disappointed in Donald Trump to being disappointed in the people he hired. In 2016, we trusted the plan with Trump. But now Trump has become the deep state. The exact thing we voted him in. It's not my place, but I do think the way that I'm seeing it played out is that Bongino will be here and Pam Bondi will be the floor guy.

8:02I feel like we should ring a bell every time the Democrats and the Republicans are calling for the same thing. How is it so many of them came to agree on this one? Obvious play for the Dems? The downside for them in talking about this is nil. They are not worried about any of them being connected to Jeffrey Epstein's behavior because they know themselves. They were not part of this. If every theory of what Epstein was doing was proven to be true, the current leadership of the Democratic Party and the rank and file electeds would not suffer at all. None of them were connected with it. So it's gotten it was pretty easy for them to talk about.

8:39They just thought the upside was not very big. Now it's very easy for them to talk about. Do they have any power to actually expedite the release of these files or is it all in the DOJ? No, it's in the DOJ. What Democrats have done in the past few days is use opportunities in the Congress to attach an Epstein declassification amendment or language to bills. If you're not hiding anything, prove that to the American people. And if you are trying to hide something, as many of Donald Trump's MAGA supporters apparently believe, then the Congress should actually work hard to try to uncover the truth for the American people.

9:23It's convenient that they have video of J.D. Vance telling Theo Vaughn. Seriously, we need to release the F-scene list. That is an important thing. Yeah, they have that video. They could run that. Is this going to be a top voting issue in 2028? Who knows? But it's helpful to them. They have a video of the likely next Republican nominee making this promise that he couldn't keep. And the worst case scenario for them is the administration reverses. It is released and they have a bunch of information that's damaging to Republicans and not themselves. That is that it's a very low risk bet for them, which is the kind of bet Democrats like to make.

9:55Trump doesn't seem to have satisfying answers for his base, for the people who are very loud and very online saying this is a betrayal. Does he just hope this is going to go away? Lots of stuff has gone away. Trump has had a lot of problems that were going to take him out and they didn't. If I were Donald Trump, I'd be very confident that I can beef this out the way that I did the Excess Hollywood tape, the way that I did indictments, that I'll get lucky and that people will move on. But the moment of maximum disappointment in Trump from the voters we're talking about was this cabinet meeting after the DOJ memo where a reporter is asking Pam Bondi at the table, Pam Bondi, not Trump, asking Pam Bondi to clarify some of what the memo says and why the files that she said were on her desk have not been released.

10:44And Trump intervenes and gets annoyed that the media is still asking about it. Yeah, sure. Could I just interrupt for a little second? Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking, we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy, this creep? Now, the only thing I'd say is that there is always a search in the press for, is this going to be the moment when Trump loses his base, where the MAGA movement gets disappointed? That hasn't really happened. for anything.

11:26And there is an enormous capacity for forgiveness. But electorally, we're looking at the midterms, we're looking at 2028. And if there are millions of voters who came into the coalition, let's say, with RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard because they thought he was going to turn everything upside down. Well, what is he's done some things that no other president did. But he's also he was going to end the war in Ukraine day one. And he's he's selling arms to NATO so that they can give them to Ukraine. He was going to end the war in Gaza. It's not it's not over. There are ceasefires and officers getting out.

11:58He's not done that. And he didn't do this. And so there is a it's not showing up in donations to Republicans. But when Republicans go back to the Trump electorate and say, hey, we noticed that you didn't usually vote, but you vote in 2024. Are you excited again? A lot of them are going to say, nope, I don't trust anybody now. But you are seeing people who were not normal Republicans, didn't usually vote in midterms. Those people have drifted away and they have a very low level of faith right now. I don't think they're going to walk away completely from Trump over this, but they're not going to be Trump hype men the way they were in October 2024.

12:44Semaphore.com, that's where you can read David Weigel. The Epstein files live at the Department of Justice, so we are going to head there next on Today Explained.

13:16Support for the show comes from Grow Therapy. Everyone thinks they're therapists, especially in the new year, when you might be getting advice from every corner of your life, your feed, your group chat, even your barista. But here's the thing. Advice isn't therapy. Therapy is therapy. and if you're looking to start therapy with licensed professionals, Grow Therapy is there to help. Grow can connect you with thousands of independent licensed therapists across the country, offering both virtual and in-person sessions. You can search therapists by what matters most to you, like insurance, specialty, identity, or availability, and get started in as little as two days.

13:55And if something comes up, you can cancel up to 24 hours in advance at no cost. Grow says there are no subscriptions. and no long-term commitments. You just pay per session. Whatever challenges you're facing, Growth Therapy is here to help. Sessions average about$21 with insurance, and some pay as little as$0, depending on their plan. Visit growththerapy.com slash explained to get started. That's growththerapy.com slash explained. growththerapy.com slash explained. Availability and coverage vary by state and insurance plan.

14:36Support for the show comes from BoxyCat. There's a lot to love about having a cat in your home. But there's one thing that even the most ardent cat lover could do without. Stinky litter boxes. Boxy says that they can help. Boxy wants to be the last kitty litter you ever try. They say the difference is in their formula, which includes probiotics that can stop bacteria that cause odors. Plus, Boxy says their clumping power is superior, making it easier to scoop so your litter box can be less stinky without any of the fake fragrances. Here's our colleague, Andrew Malnizik, to tell us more. So my sister is that cat mom.

15:13She calls them her children. So when it comes to trying anything new for them, she's incredibly skeptic and always a little hesitant. That's why I was so excited to hear that she was really enjoying Boxy's cat litter. The first thing she noticed, there was just zero issues transitioning to cats. There was no drama from them, which, you know, cats can kind of push back and be a little bit drama. It was really a miracle. If you're tired of switching litters looking for the one, get Boxy at B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com. It's the last litter you'll switch to. Enjoy 30 % off with code EXPLAINED at BoxyCat.com slash EXPLAINED.

15:53That's B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com forward slash EXPLAINED.

16:04Support for today's show comes from Rubrik. Many companies are deploying AI agents at this time. They automate tasks. They handle workflows. They make decisions. And here is the thing. Sometimes, according to Rubrik, they mess up. They might delete the wrong file. They might make changes you didn't authorize. They might go off script. When that happens, you can get stuck trying to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. Enter Rubric Agent Cloud. Rubric Agent Cloud is a platform that they say lets you monitor, govern, and rewind AI agent actions. It's one platform. They say it helps you use more agents faster and without the risk.

16:46They say it runs in the background. They say it watches what's happening. They say it makes sure things stay on track. They say you can get full visibility. They say you can set guardrails so the agents don't go rogue. If your business relies on AI agents, you need the ability to monitor, govern, and rewind their actions, says Rubrik. Right now, our listeners get exclusive early access to Rubrik Agent Cloud. You can go to rubrik.com. That's R-U-B-R-I-K dot com, rubrik.com.

17:20I'm talking about Jeff Epstein, the New York financier. My name is Ellie Honig. I am a former federal and state prosecutor, and I am the author of the upcoming book, When You Come at the King, Inside DOJ's Pursuit of the President, From Nixon to Trump. And when you say you're a former prosecutor, remind us where? I was a Fed at the Southern District of New York, which will become relevant to this conversation, as that is the office that prosecuted both Jeffrey Epstein and Jelaine Maxwell. And then I was a state prosecutor later as well. So, before we get to all the questions, let me just ask you a simple one.

17:55If you're someone out there who's like, release the Epstein files. All of us as Americans, not as Democrats, not as liberals, not as Republicans, are actually lining together and saying we all want the Epstein files. Who should they be most mad at right now that they don't have their Epstein files? I'm going to answer with a what rather than a who.

18:18The first thing they should be mad at is an ancient DOJ policy that says we DOJ, we federal prosecutors do not just turn over, make public our closed investigative files because people want to know. People want to know a lot of things. People want to see all the closed files on the Trump cases. People want to see every piece of paper from Robert Herr's investigation of Joe Biden. People want to see everything from the Hunter Biden cases. But there is a longstanding DOJ policy and principle that has been observed by both political parties that we don't turn these things over. We don't slag people in public who can't defend themselves, who aren't charged with anything, who don't have the ability to go to trial.

19:02But what's confusing people, I think, about that policy, at least right now, is one very specific moment. Not all the moments where other people said these things should be released, but the moment where the person in charge of the department that doesn't typically release this kind of information said that she would. Why would Pam Bondi say it's sitting on my desk right now to review? That's been a directive by President Trump. If she didn't intend to look into that, did something happen? The answer is I have no earthly idea. But yeah, Pam Bondi has just handled this whole situation in an utterly inexplicable, inconsistent, and I think often dishonest manner.

19:46I mean, look, she blazes into office as attorney general, and she basically, by her actions, makes clear, I don't give a crap about that policy that I just talked about. I'm going to be turning this all over. I'm going to break the cover off this thing, and you all are going to know everything. I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you're going to see some Epstein information being released by my office. By the way, it goes back. If you remember months ago, Pam Bondi had her much ballyhooed phase one disclosure, right? She called all these conservative influencers to the White House and gave them these white thick binders labeled the Epstein files phase one.

20:25And you've seen the photo of people triumphantly holding up these files. Well, what happened when they opened those binders? Absolutely nothing was in them. It came out later from those influencers, among others, who I think were also disappointed. Not a single new thing was printed or offered. And this whole thing had been some sort of a rope-a-dope. And maybe at that point, Pam Bondi was hoping, all right, let's just hope this kind of fades away. Clearly, when she said... It's sitting on my desk right now to review. It wasn't, because it appears there is no client list per se. Now, that doesn't mean nobody is implicated, but this notion that there's some list, there's some piece of paper entitled Jeffrey Epstein's client list, one, two, three, seems to be pretty clearly an oversimplification.

21:10So I think that's the$64 ,000 question. Why this very sudden, very stark turnabout? Well, since we can't necessarily answer that question yet, can we maybe answer the question of like how Pam Bondi came to be sitting at the top of the United States Department of Justice? So Pam Bondi on paper looked like she was quite qualified to be the attorney general of the United States. She had been a prosecutor for 20 years. She was the attorney general of Florida, the state attorney general for two terms for eight years. And so if you just take that resume, I'd say, yeah, that's actually quite comparable to several other AGs and more prosecutorial experience.

21:53Perhaps more qualified than, say, like, I don't know, Matt Gaetz? Speaking of government bureaucrats. Yeah, Matt Gaetz had zero qualifications. The objections that were lodged to her related to her independence and her credibility. Primarily two things. One is she has a long history with Trump. She has represented him briefly during one of his impeachments. They've had political support for one another. That's not that big a deal. The bigger problem, though, is she was and in part remains a 2020 election denier. Pam, did you just say fake ballots? There could be. That's the problem. If they're letting, we don't know, Steve.

22:33Have you heard stories of ballots that are fake? And if so, just tell us what you know. Well, we know that ballots have been dumped. There were ballots that were found early on. We've heard that people were receiving ballots that were dead. And when she was confronted about this at her confirmation hearing in 2025 about her election denial. Who won the 2020 presidential election? She fell back on the old cop-out line of. Joe Biden is the president of the United States. She wouldn't disavow her prior election denialism.

23:10And meanwhile, there's been a lot of writing that Pam Bondi has perhaps brought the Justice Department under Donald Trump in a way that we haven't seen in decades. What do you think is the clearest evidence of that? Oh, I think that's true. And I think it's provable. I mean, if we think back through the last many AGs, and by the way, I'd include Donald Trump's prior AGs, Bill Barr, who, by the way, my first book is a criticism of Bill Barr's tenure as Trump's AG called Hatchet Man. But I think Bondi is different and worse. Because even Bill Barr didn't believe the big lie. There's been no discrepancy reported anywhere that's looked at that.

23:53And I'm still not aware of any discrepancy. Barr had his lines. Bondi has no lines. And I'll give you something that, to me, was a really telling moment for Pam Bondi. It's kind of been almost forgotten already in the shuffle of it all. The Signal scandal. Hours before the U.S. launched these surprise attacks on the Houthi militant group in Yemen, the Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, had all the details right in front of him. In addition to Goldberg, the chat included National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsa - What does Pam Bondi do?

Read the full transcript

24:30At a minimum, any modestly halfway semi-independent AG would at least say, we're going to investigate, we're going to get to the bottom of this. And then who knows, maybe come back in six months and say, all right, we looked at it. And while people were reckless, there was nothing quite criminal. Pam Bondi, in contrast, basically announces three days in. It was sensitive information, not classified and inadvertently released. And what we should be talking about is it was a very successful mission. And that moment to me showed us that she is completely at Trump's beck and call, and she will never intentionally do anything contrary to Trump's political interests.

25:14Like maybe release the Epstein files. Well, there you go. I mean, that's one of the theories that's out there that perhaps there's something in there that's bad for Trump. So now by coming in and being part of the cover-up, the Trump administration has become part of it. I mean, it's just, you cannot see it any other way. By the way, who knows? But it's already been disclosed that Trump is in the address book, the black book. There's all sorts of phone numbers for Donald Trump and Mar-a-Lago in there. We know they're old friends. I mean, this is a sort of forgotten moment, but Donald Trump, some magazine did a magazine feature on Jeffrey Epstein years ago before he had been convicted of any crime.

25:54And both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are quoted in the magazine. And Trump's quote that he gave is something like, he sure does like beautiful women even younger than I do or something. I'm not getting it word for word, but it's very close to that. So would it be shocking if there was something embarrassing for Donald Trump in those files or Bill Clinton or whoever? No. Do you think the anger that's directed at Pam Bondi right now is misdirected. And in fact, it should be going right to the top when Donald Trump is out there clearly stating he has no desire to see these files released, not to mention has previously made, you know, no secret of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

26:36Yeah. Let me put it this way. Either one of the president or the attorney general has the power almost without question to disclose whatever they want to disclose like that with a snap of the fingers. You know, at one point, I think it was Pam Bondi said, well, we'd have to do redactions and there's victims and yes. So of course you'd have to protect victims and minors and redact out pornographic materials and all that stuff. However, any one of them does have the ability to disclose whatever they deem fit tonight if they wanted to. You think they'll do it? There's two ways I see this going. I don't think they'll ever open the files and just say, here you go, everybody.

27:20I think either they will try to appease the public and the media by making some sort of partial halfway disclosure, but that's not going to satisfy anybody. And Pam Bondi just now reiterated she is sticking to that DOJ FBI memo. She said that memo that says basically nothing more to see here, no cases to be brought and case closed. Basically, Pam Bondi just doubled down on that. She said that's our position and I'm not answering any other questions. So if people are wondering, are we ever going to just see a complete dump and complete satisfaction? No, I don't think that's ever going to happen.

28:06Eli Honig, you heard about his book and his other book But he also writes for New York Magazine Subscribe at nymag.com Our show was produced by Denise Guerra And Hadi Mawagdi Edited by Miranda Kennedy Fact-checked by Laura Bullard And mixed by Patrick Boyd And Matthew Billy This is Today Explained

28:39Thank you.

29:01Too many apps, endless emails, and scattered chats can slow everything down. Zoom brings it all together. Meetings, chat, docs, and AI companion seamlessly on one platform. With everything connected, your workday flows, collaboration feels easier, and progress actually happens. Take back your workday at zoom.com slash podcast and zoom ahead.

From the publisher

You probably shouldn't expect to see the Epstein Files anytime soon. That's because the Department of Justice belongs to President Trump.

This episode was produced by Hady Mawajdeh and Denise Guerra, edited by Miranda Kennedy, fact checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Matthew Billy, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram.

Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast.

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Today, Explained

All 558 episodes
Trump's Epstein problemToday, Explained · 26 min
Listen in VO