Trump’s new war on drugs

0:00You've probably heard by now that the president did a post over the weekend. It's an AI-generated image inspired by the movie Apocalypse Now. But instead of napalming Vietnam, President Trump appears to be napalming Chicago. It's labeled Shipocalypse Now because wordplay doesn't always have to be good. Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois responded. Take off that cavalry hat, you draft dodger. You didn't earn the right to wear it. Stolen valor at its worst. Some guy named Alex responded to Duckworth. I think the bigger issue here is that he posted an image of himself napalming Chicago. Maybe an even bigger issue still is what the president is doing in international waters around Venezuela.

0:43That's where he actually blew up a boat he said was carrying 11 drug smugglers and their drugs. An actual act of war. A declaration. Legal? We're going to ask on Today Explained from Vox. But it's not looking great.

1:05Están escuchando a Hoy Explicado. You're listening to Today Explained. I'm Samantha Schmidt, and I'm the Bogotá Bureau Chief for The Washington Post. So you're in Latin America. What are the vibes right now? You know, several days, almost a week since the president blew up a boat off the coast of Venezuela. Things are tense still. You know, even though we didn't see any major action over the weekend, there's still this feeling that anything could happen right now, particularly in Venezuela. I think ever since these warships were sent to the Caribbean, we've been waiting to see what the U.S. might do in the region.

1:47And this boat, I think, put everyone on high alert. It was a sort of sign that anything could happen and that the U.S. is willing to escalate things to a point we've never seen before. I know after this attack on this vessel, there were lots of unanswered questions. And now that it's been almost a week, I wonder if we have more answers. Can you tell us in as much detail as you can what happened on September 2nd? So we still have a lot of unanswered questions. You know, from the beginning, the Trump administration released this video. We just, over the last few minutes, literally shot out a boat, a drug-carrying boat, a lot of drugs in that boat.

2:33Showing how this boat, which was a pretty modestly sized boat, it was not a very big boat, was speeding through the Caribbean, through open water, and suddenly it was engulfed in flames. and we're not even entirely sure who conducted the strike, but the Trump administration said that they attacked this boat, that 11 people were on board the vessel. All of them were killed. And Trump himself claims that they knew these were drug traffickers. On the vote, you had massive amounts of drugs. We have tapes of them speaking. There was massive amounts of drugs coming into our country to kill a lot of people.

3:12But they didn't identify who the people were on the boat or any evidence that they have justifying this and proving that they were, in fact, drug smugglers. You see it. You see the bags of drugs all over the boat. There are some indications from local reporting of where in Venezuela it may have originated from, but we don't even have exact evidence of that. We have a lot of drugs pouring into our country, coming in for a long time. And we just, these came out of Venezuela and coming out very heavily from Venezuela. A lot of things are coming out of Venezuela, so... We took it out. And Trump has said that these were members of a Venezuelan gang called Tren de Aragua.

3:57We don't have proof of that either, yet. Tren de Aragua. Some of the worst gangs, some of the worst people anywhere in the world in terms of gangs. So there's just a lot of questions. And I think some of the most revealing comments about this came from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said that A drug boat was headed towards eventually the United States. And instead of interdicting it The way that the U.S. usually does On the president's orders, he blew it up. And it'll happen again. And that, according to him, these were drug smugglers who presented an immediate threat to the United States.

4:38means by that and how these specific 11 people were an immediate threat to the United States. And do we even know if there were 11 people on board this vessel? Because the White House said 11. You watch the video and it doesn't necessarily look like there are 11 people on board. So maybe they're like below deck. But then how big is below deck? I had questions. Based on the video evidence, You can't really tell. And some have raised questions about why 11, when a boat this size, you wouldn't need 11 people. You know, there's questions about whether they were all drug smugglers, you know, whether some of them were drug smugglers or some of them were passengers on the boat.

5:21This is all speculation. I mean, in this region, if it did in fact leave the Venezuelan coast where local reporting has indicated it may have left from, There is drug smuggling that goes on there, right? And there are groups that are taking drugs to nearby Caribbean islands and to the United States. But there's also people who smuggle migrants across these waters. So it's not entirely clear. But yeah, we have not gotten that level of detail yet. Got it. Okay, so 11 people aside, drug smugglers aside, a boat was blown up and people died. What do we know about the legality of this move? So the White House has said that this was taken in defense of vital U.S.

6:08national interests and the collective self-defense of other nations. The president of the United States is going to wage war on narco-terrorist organizations. This one was operating in international waters, headed towards the United States to flood our country with poison. And under President Trump, those days are over. And that appears to be referring to this 2001 authorization for the use of military force enacted by Congress after 9-11. And it authorizes use of force against perpetrators of the attacks, such as al-Qaeda, and to prevent, quote, future acts of international terrorism. And the White House has said that that strike was fully consistent with the law of armed conflict.

6:46But armed conflict here seems unclear. I mean, there is no armed conflict between the United States and Venezuela. We spoke with this professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, and she said that this violated international law and that the only time when you can commit a strike like this, it's to protect human life, you know, in an emergency in which you're trying to protect people whose lives are at risk immediately. and I just think that it raises a lot of questions about what the Trump administration is willing to do outside of war, in international waters, against people who are presumably sending drugs to the United States, but without or before providing evidence of that.

7:35Right. They're saying Tren de Aragua is this terrorist group. Is it even legal to designate Tren de Aragua as terrorists? Do we know how that works? This is also a question that has come up a lot because we know that Tren de Aragua is a real gang. The Venezuelan prison gang, the toughest gang they say in the world, known as Tren de Aragua. It has spread throughout South America and has caused a lot of damage, particularly within Venezuelan migrant diaspora communities in the region. and that they have spread and taken control of migrant routes. They extort people. They're a real gang that has caused real damage and has a real capacity to expand.

8:23The Trump administration has said that they are invading the United States and that Maduro is directing this invasion. They emptied out, you don't know this, but they emptied out their prisons in Venezuela and they emptied them out into the United States of America. But we have also seen extensive reporting now, including in the Washington Post, that secret intelligence reports have revealed that that is not true. And that it's not Maduro who is directing this gang to flood the United States and destabilize the United States. And that is a stretch. Even though there might be some low-level connections between the gang and the government, this is a leap, according to our reporting.

9:10How much tension has this caused between the United States and Venezuela? Quite a bit. And, you know, this is something that Maludo has for years tried to claim in Venezuela, that it's the U.S. imperialist United States going after Venezuela, trying to destabilize it the way that they have tried to destabilize countries in South America for generations. And so, you know, this is really in line with his message. And he has taken advantage of it in the last few days in his speeches, you know, saying that the U.S. needs to back down and stop trying to pursue regime change and that Venezuela will defend its sovereignty.

9:54and he has said that he is mobilizing civilians to join these things called militias in Venezuela, which are not known to be the most highly trained, prepared troops in the country. They're often sort of seen as sort of older, retired men. But he's said that he's sending thousands of troops to the Colombian border, that he's beefing up the military presence in the country to prepare for a possible invasion. And his other allies, his other members of his government have also sent very strong messages accusing the US of extrajudicial killings with this strike. Even though at the beginning, they also claimed that it was AI and that it didn't actually happen.

10:43And so there's been sort of some mixed messaging on that. But things are getting tense. And a few days ago, we saw that two Maluto, Venezuelan government military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters. And yeah, the Department of Defense said it was a highly provocative move designed to interfere with our counter-narcotics operations and strongly advise Venezuela not to pursue any further effort to obstruct these operations. So that was a moment where things started to feel like they were really on the precipice of something. But I think there's this feeling that anything could happen.

11:28Samantha Schmidt, WashingtonPost.com. Over the weekend, our vice president, J.D. Vance, tweeted, Killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military. Someone wrote back to him, killing the citizens of another nation who are civilians without any due process is called a war crime. To which Vance wrote back, I don't give a shit what you call it. Perfectly normal behavior on a Saturday morning from our vice president. But a lot of people were shocked. Down in Latin America, though, they've seen this one before. More on that when we're back on Today Explained.

12:12Support for the show today comes from none other than HIMSS. Erectile dysfunction can make you feel like you aren't yourself. HIMSS says they can help you get back to the best version of you with personalized ED treatments that are prescribed by licensed providers, including daily meds, that support more spontaneous moments. Sounds fun. HIMSS says they offer access to ED treatment options, including trusted generics that cost 95 % less than brand names of prescribed. And since HIMSS is 100 % online, you can get the care you need from the comfort of your own home. No sitting around under fluorescent lights.

12:46Reading a week's old magazine while you wait for an appointment. Remember magazines? You can get simple online access to personalized affordable care for ED, hair loss, weight loss, and more by visiting HIMSS.com. That's HIMSS.com. For your free online visit, HIMSS.com. Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan. And featured products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness, or quality. Prescription required. See website for details, restrictions, and important safety information.

13:21Support for the show comes from BoxyCat. There's a lot to love about having a cat in your home. But there's one thing that even the most ardent cat lover could do without. Stinky litter boxes. Boxy says that they can help. Boxy wants to be the last kitty litter you ever try. They say the difference is in their formula, which includes probiotics that can stop bacteria that cause odors. Plus, Boxy says their clumping power is superior, making it easier to scoop so your litter box can be less stinky without any of the fake fragrances. Here's our colleague, Andrew Malnizik, to tell us more. So my sister is that cat mom.

13:58She calls them her children. So when it comes to trying anything new for them, She's incredibly skeptic and always a little hesitant. That's why I was so excited to hear that she was really enjoying Boxy's cat litter. The first thing she noticed, there was just zero issues transitioning to cats. There was no drama from them, which, you know, cats can kind of push back and be a little bit drama. It was really a miracle. If you're tired of switching litters looking for the one, get Boxy at B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com. It's the last letter you'll switch to. Enjoy 30 % off with code EXPLAINED at boxycat.com slash explained.

14:38That's B-O-X-I-E-C-A-T dot com forward slash explained.

14:49Support for today's show comes from Rubrik. Many companies are deploying AI agents at this time. They automate tasks. They handle workflows. They make decisions. And here is the thing. Sometimes, according to Rubric, they mess up. They might delete the wrong file. They might make changes you didn't authorize. They might go off script. When that happens, you can get stuck trying to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. Enter Rubric Agent Cloud. Rubric Agent Cloud is a platform that they say lets you monitor, govern, and rewind AI agent actions. It's one platform. They say it helps you use more agents faster and without the risk.

15:31They say it runs in the background. They say it watches what's happening. They say it makes sure things stay on track. They say you can get full visibility. They say you can set guardrails so the agents don't go rogue. If your business relies on AI agents, you need the ability to monitor, govern, and rewind their actions, says Rubrik. Right now, our listeners get exclusive early access to Rubrik Agent Cloud. You can go to rubrik.com. That's R-U-B-R-I-K.com, rubrik.com.

16:07Mr. President, do you have any reaction to today's play being named the best news show? Wow. I didn't know that. I just, you're telling me now for the first time. We wanted to more deeply understand what drone striking a Venezuelan boat out of the blue meant for the region, Central America, Latin America, South America, the hemisphere. To do so, it's best to look back. For help, we reached out to Alex Avina, history professor at Arizona State University. I fear that it's not just going to be a Venezuela thing. Prior to making threats against Venezuela and organizing this, what looks like to be a naval expeditionary force, they were threatening Mexico for a few years now.

16:51I will order the Department of Defense to make appropriate use of special forces, cyber warfare and other overt and covert actions to inflict maximum damage on cartel leadership, infrastructure and operations. I will designate the major cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. Promising some sort of kinetic or covert or even drone military operation against so-called drug cartels in Mexico. So I think some of the threats originally were against Mexico, but they decided to act on Venezuela first. Our only interest at this point is making sure that the people of Venezuela are able to determine their own destiny.

17:35Let's just go back to mid-2010s. during the Obama administration, because that's when we have the designation of Venezuela and President Nicolás Maduro as forming some sort of national security threat. We're not promoting instability in Venezuela. Rather, we believe respect for democratic norms and human rights is the best guarantee of Venezuela's stability, hence our executive order. And then when we get to Trump 1, that's when they started to introduce specific drug trafficking charges against President Maduro. His charge, along with his co-defendants, with conspiracy to commit narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import hundreds of tons of cocaine into the United States, and related weapons offenses.

18:17So this specific chapter of Venezuela goes back to the first Trump administration in 2020 when they started to go after Maduro on drug trafficking charges.

18:28Okay, so that's the first Trump administration. Here we are in Trump to Trump Harder, and he starts... Designating the cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. Tell us about that move. Who gets designated that way? How much of a game changer is that? This is, in my view, this is the ultimate melding of war on terror with the war on drugs. because now you can justify any sort of unilateral military operation or action against any of the drug trafficking organizations and gangs that are now designated as foreign terrorist organizations. So there's four or five drug trafficking organizations in Mexico who are part of this list.

19:12We have MS-13 and we have Tren d 'Aragua, which is a Venezuelan group. And now we have this Cartel de los Soles, or the Cartel of the Sons. So what we really see is a treatment of drug trafficking less as a crime. And now it's like a national security threat because it's a terrorist. And once you label anything a terrorist, you can pretty much justify anything. And that's been like a hallmark of the U.S.-led war on terror since late 2001. Right. We're familiar with that approach from ISIS, from al-Qaeda. But has it ever been used to combat our drug problem? Not in the way that we just saw with just the taking out of a boat.

19:53This is a longer history. It goes back to the 1980s with Ronald Reagan's administration. As you know, one of the most critical duties that we faced upon taking office was controlling the influx of illegal drugs into this country. They're the ones who really started to talk about narco-terrorism. Subcommittee on Narcotics Terrorism International Operations will come to order. Talk about drug traffickers as a national security threat. Our borders are inundated with more narcotics than at any time ever before. Narco-terrorists that deserve to be treated in a way different than common criminals. A syndicate of organized criminals whose power is now reaching unparalleled heights.

20:32But they didn't really act on it. If anything, those early years led to a militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border. But it didn't lead to outright military action against individuals believed or charged to be drug traffickers without much of, or if any, due process. It gets ramped up in, I mean, if you watch movies in the 1990s, like Clear and Present Danger is kind of like a hallmark of that kind of thinking. These drug cartels represent a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. A fantastical rendition of it. But it's really the war on terror with George W. Bush that you start to once again associate drug trafficking organizations with terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda, like Hezbollah.

21:18We must stop looking at the drug cartels today solely from a law enforcement perspective and consider designating these narco-trafficking members as foreign terrorist organizations if they are providing material support and assistance to other foreign terrorist organizations.

21:41Trump, famously an isolationist, does taking these war on terror like tactics in our hemisphere risk prolonged conflict, risk war? Yes. I mean, and that's what worries me the most, right? So if they engage in military operations in Venezuela proper, then that's only going to create some of the problems that Trump says he's against, like human movement and migration and the displacement of populations who will leave Venezuela and escape to try to escape potential war. And many of those people will likely try to come here. If they do this in Mexico, it's going to be even a more direct relationship.

22:21They're supposedly our ally, our biggest trading partner. There's military to military collaboration as of right now involving counter narcotics operations. So like a Trump decision to attack Mexico would have disastrous consequences. And potentially one would be Mexico turns economically toward China as a way to offset U.S. economic power and influence. If they start doing military operations against so-called drug cartels in Mexico, then you will have human displacement and population movement and maybe even attempt to come into the United States. Honestly, what would make a bigger impact is to address the issue of why so many Americans, past and present, have turned to illicit narcotics.

23:05What is it about the United States that makes it such a huge market for illicit narcotics? And this has been a standard for more than 100 years. like addressing it the question or the issue from that vantage point I think could lead us to much more productive solutions than to bomb boats off the coast of Venezuela and then retroactively say oh that was a drug smuggling boat like I don't think you can blow your way out of this because you're going to end up hurting a lot of people who have nothing to do with the trade or who just happen to live in the same communities where these drug trafficking organizations wield a lot of influence like where do you you know who's a narco and who isn't a narco like that's a blurry line in between these subjectivities or identities on the ground in certain parts of Mexico and Latin America.

23:49I will say that I think maybe Trump and a lot of the people closest to him have watched like the Sicario movies and they think that real life is going to play out like the Sicario movies.

24:04I want to laugh, but I want to cry at the same time because I just think they took Taylor Sheridan's work is nonfiction, and that's a scary proposition. Do these Latin American, Central American, South American nations have any recourse if Trump really decides to ramp up here? What are they going to do? I mean, I think we've seen that international law really means nothing now. The UN has lost a lot of its power in the last couple of years, a lot of its influence and authority. I think the only thing they have left to do is what someone like Simon Bolivar, the Latin American independence hero, was trying to do in the 1820s, which is to present a unified Latin America as a counterweight to the U.S.

24:45And we've seen this. Like, we saw the president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, say that if Venezuela gets attacked, we essentially take that as an attack on us and we're going to back them up. Trump just says that he sends his planes to bombard. And we have to think, Captain, what are we going to do? Because then he's going to bombard Colombia. So it would be interesting to see if any sort of future U.S. attack on Venezuela will spur like a regional unification as a counterweight to what the U.S. wants to do with Venezuela and around the issue of drugs in general. Well, since you're a historian, how has that gone in the past when Latin Americans band together Bolivar style to stand up to foreign intervention?

25:29Does it work? There's a famous Uruguayan writer, Eduardo Galeano, who talks about how Latin America could be considered to be a series of idiot nations who were trained to dislike one another, and that prevents some sort of unity. Latin America is an archipelago of idiot countries organized for separation and trained to dislike each other. You know, part of the U.S. imperial strategy in Latin America is always an old one. It's divide and conquer. But during the so-called pink tide of the 2000s, when the U.S. was busy invading Afghanistan and Iraq, they kind of turned their attention away from Latin America.