Managing the News in the Age of Trump

1 Oct 2025 · 23 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Trumponomics Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Title

Managing the News in the Age of Trump

Overview In this episode of *Trumponomics*, host Stephanie Flanders engages in a panel discussion from the Bloomberg event "Women, Money and Power" with Alessandra Galloni (Editor-in-Chief of *Reuters*) and Zanny Minton Beddoes (Editor-in-Chief of *The Economist*). The conversation revolves around the challenges facing news agencies in covering the Trump administration, the implications of "Trumponomics" on press freedom, and the broader impact on global economics.

Key Themes

  1. The Changing Landscape of Journalism
  2. Volume of News: The sheer volume of news emerging from the Trump administration presents unique challenges for journalists.
  3. Aggressive Media Relations: The administration's tactics, including lawsuits against major news organizations and control over media access, have shifted the dynamics of press freedom.
  1. Balancing Independence and Fairness
  2. Editorial Independence: Both Galloni and Beddoes discuss their commitment to unbiased reporting despite the pressures of the current political climate.
  3. Differentiating Signal from Noise: An emphasis is placed on avoiding overwhelming the audience with Trump-related news, while still acknowledging his significant global impact.
  1. Global Implications of Trumponomics
  2. US Economic Policies: Discussion about the monetization of US global influence and how Trump's policies could be perceived as a form of "mafioso shakedown."
  3. Short-term Success vs. Long-term Implications: The panel posits that while the administration might see short-term effectiveness in its trade negotiations and tariffs, the long-term consequences could harm the US economy and its global standing.
  1. Geopolitical Shifts
  2. Global Trade Dynamics: The conversation touches on the evolving landscape of global trade and how nations are navigating their interests in response to US policies.
  3. Coordination Among Countries: The panelists note that despite the Trump administration's challenges, underlying international relationships and collaborations continue to function at various levels.

Key Takeaways

  • Impact on Journalism: The Trump administration's approach has forced media outlets to adapt their reporting methods and strategies, prioritizing integrity and factual accuracy.
  • Critical Reflection: Journalists must consider how their coverage will be perceived in hindsight and strive to document the complexities of the current political landscape without oversimplification.
  • Long-term Economic Outlook: There is skepticism regarding the sustainability of Trump's economic strategies and whether they will ultimately benefit the US or lead to greater isolation in the global market.

Closing Thoughts The episode underscores the intertwined relationship between Trump’s economic policies and journalistic challenges, highlighting the evolving nature of news reporting in a politically charged environment. Both Galloni and Beddoes emphasize the importance of resilience and fairness in journalism, despite the complexities introduced by the Trump administration.

Production Credits

  • Host: Stephanie Flanders
  • Guests: Alessandra Galloni and Zanny Minton Beddoes
  • Producers: Sam Asadi and Moses Andam
  • Sound Design: Blake Maples and Kelly Gary
  • Executive Producer: Amy Keene
  • Head of Podcasts: Sage Bowman

For further insights, listen to the full episode of *Trumponomics* wherever you get your podcasts.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Zanny Minton Beddoes:The news doesn't stop on the weekends. Context changes constantly. And now Bloomberg is the place to stay on top of it all. Hi, I'm David Gurra. Join us every Saturday and Sunday for the new Bloomberg This Weekend. I'm Christina Ruffini. We'll bring you the latest headlines, in-depth analysis and big interviews. All the stories that hit home on your days off. And I'm Lisa Mateo. Watch and listen to Bloomberg This Weekend for thoughtful, enlightening conversations about business, lifestyle, people and culture. On Saturday mornings, we put the past week's events into context, examining what happened in the markets and the world.

0:35Zanny Minton Beddoes:Then on Sundays, we speak with journalists, columnists, and key political figures to prepare you for the week ahead. Join us as soon as you wake up and bring us with you wherever your weekend plans take you. Watch us on Bloomberg Television, listen on Bloomberg Radio, stream the show live on the Bloomberg Business app, or listen to the podcast. That's Bloomberg this weekend, Saturdays and Sundays starting at 7 a.m. Eastern on February 28th. Make us part of your weekend routine on Bloomberg Television, radio, and wherever you get your podcasts.

1:09Zanny Minton Beddoes:People who didn't do what John of God wanted them to do, they usually disappeared. John of God was once Brazil's most famous spiritual healer. But in this limited series podcast, we uncover the darker truth behind his global empire of faith and fear. From Exactly Right and Adonde Media, this is Two-Faced, John of God. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:45Zanny Minton Beddoes:Bloomberg Audio Studios.

1:47Alessandra Galloni:Podcasts, radio, news. I think the best way of characterising this administration, it is essentially the kind of monetisation of US hegemony. The less polite way is something about a mafioso shakedown.

2:10Stephanie Flanders:I'm Stephanie Flanders, Head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg, and this is Trumponomics, the podcast that looks at the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped the global economy, and what on earth is going to happen next. This week, well, we're widening the lens a bit because I just had a fascinating conversation I'd like to share with you. The occasion was Bloomberg's second Women, Money and Power event in London, and the conversation was with Alessandra Galoni, the editor-in-chief of Reuters News Agency, and Zanni Mintembedos, editor-in-chief of The Economist. The title of our session was Reporting on Money and Power in the Current Moment.

2:48Stephanie Flanders:And there was plenty of Trumponomics in the mix. But what you'll also hear is how all three of us have been grappling with not just the sheer volume of news coming out of Washington, but also the Trump administration's aggressive approach to handling the media. We see that obviously in the Jimmy Kimmel saga and the many lawsuits the president has filed against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, most of the traditional US news networks. but it's also something we've been living with behind the scenes since the White House took control of the White House press pool and dramatically cut the mainstream media's regular access to the president.

3:24Stephanie Flanders:So yes, it's a little bit more introspective than our usual discussions on Trumponomics but like it or not, Donald Trump is leaving his mark on journalism as well as the global economy and sitting at the helm of these two major news organisations, Zannie and Alessandra have a bird's-eye view of both. I started by asking Alessandra, eight months in, how this Trump administration had changed the way Reuters did its job.

3:57Zanny Minton Beddoes:I think there's sort of two buckets, right? There's what you have to do journalistically, and then it's sort of how you go about it and navigate some of the new rules that have come in. But journalistically, I think, you know, the bottom line is sort of a back to the future. You do what we always do, which is you report this administration. And what we try to do is we try to report what matters, you know, what the real effects of the executive orders are or what the real effects of changes in policy, new laws are. So, for example, just yesterday we had a story that looked at how prosecutions for drug abuse or for money laundering or for financial crimes that used to be prosecuted a lot in the U.S.

4:39Zanny Minton Beddoes:have now sort of given way to deportations because so much attention of the Trump administration is focused on deportations that a lot of the same sort of prosecutors and officers who were focusing on one type of crime are now focusing on what Trump classifies as another type of crime. So, again, what flows from changes in policy? That's just one example. I mean, this is worth perhaps mentioning a few of the restrictions that we've had. The new one is on the Pentagon reporting, which all of us have, which is that there's a new rule now or a new request for all journalists who cover the Pentagon to sign a piece of paper saying that essentially we wouldn't publish something that could be in a security interest of the U.S.

5:22Zanny Minton Beddoes:without checking with the Pentagon first, essentially. Now, of course, that is something that we can't do, right? And that is something that I think, you know, to my knowledge, virtually nobody has signed this, right? And you face the same thing. And so we're, you know, talking to the administration about how we can change this. And interestingly, what we understand is that it's actually aimed more at people who work in the Pentagon to avoid them from leaking. And of course, leaks also have been sort of more kind of criminalized, has been a criminalization of what the administration would call leaks.

5:52Zanny Minton Beddoes:So I think on the reporting side, we keep reporting on the news, trying to understand what is going on, and then sort of try to convince the administration that First Amendment press freedom is something important for everyone, no matter where you operate in the US, or in our case, in all the 200 other countries where we work.

6:10Stephanie Flanders:And as wire news services, obviously Reuters and Bloomberg have been affected by just taking the wires out of the Oval Office as a matter of course, off the plane. There was always a wire journalist previously on the plane or more than one. There's just a consistent sort of lack of people to ask questions or questions that aren't along the lines of, Mr. President, how do you look so healthy and so much younger than in your previous administration? But I mean, Zannie, you're in a slightly different position with The Economist, but I know, obviously, you have a much the same journalistic mission.

6:40Stephanie Flanders:How are you dealing with the different approach that this administration has?

6:44Alessandra Galloni:You know, what we do is to join the dots between geopolitics, business, technology, to help our readers understand where the world is going. And that mission is exactly the same as it always has been. And the Trump administration changed our framework because the Trump administration is so dominant in pretty much every global story. And so for me, one of the things that has changed is that I spend a lot of time making sure that we differentiate between the signal and the noise. If you're not careful, every story about every part of the world could start with a reference to Donald Trump. And so I spend quite a lot of time either literally or at least figuratively crossing out first paragraphs that mention Trump too much.

7:27Alessandra Galloni:It would be incredibly boring if you had every single story framed in a Trump way. Differentiating the signal from the noise also means, you know, not suffering from Trump derangement syndrome and being fair-minded about the way you cover this administration. We have a lot of Republican readers. We have a lot of Trump administration people read us and indeed Trumpians read us. And I think it's very important that even people who don't share the economist's worldview, we believe in liberal values. We were founded to champion them. They drive what we do. but I feel very strongly that even people who do not share that view should find our journalism useful.

8:04Alessandra Galloni:And so we need to be rigorous, fact-based. We need to really go the extra mile to make sure we are fair-minded in our analysis. And that's doubly important at this moment. In terms of the kind of way we deal with it, I mean, of course things have changed for us too. All my non-American journalists, when they go to the US now, including me, Carrier, I think it's a G29 form. It's a form that if you are stopped by the Customs and Border Patrol, you sign it. I'm sure you have it too. And they have to call our lawyer in the US. I look at my phone before I go, I scrub my phone to make sure that just in case, I have to say, I've gone to the US every week this month, and I've sailed in, and I have global entry, and it's all been fine.

8:42Alessandra Galloni:You're not well

8:42Stephanie Flanders:known for your scurrilous posts. Exactly, but I just think it's prudent.

8:45Alessandra Galloni:And that is a weird feeling. I've been to China many, many times, and I have never scrubbed my phone. I've taken a burner computer. So there are different behaviours that I do there. But so the environment has changed, undoubtedly. It's a long answer to your question, but it makes me value our independence more. This sounds incredibly pretentious, and I don't mean it to be, but I think we should all be thinking not just about the here and now, but how are our successors going to look at what we did? Did we go overboard with Trump derangement syndrome, or did we normalize totally non-normal behavior and fail to, you know, raise enough red flags about what is potentially happening to American democracy.

9:24Alessandra Galloni:And I think the balance between those two is what I'm figuring out.

9:28Stephanie Flanders:I think we do find that the White House team particularly, I think, is having to use its thesaurus very often on different words for unprecedented. That's the way you put it in perspective and don't normalise it while still reporting it. Just to come back on you, Zannie, because I was struck by this a couple of weeks ago. There's a version of Trump derangement syndrome when one's thinking about global affairs and global events. And I was struck the Shanghai summit and then the parade in China, a lot of the coverage saw everything that was happening in Beijing as a response to Trump and indeed India, Prime Minister Modi's going to China, all of that as being entirely a response to what Donald Trump had done and the trade wars and other things, which in many ways was true or at least was one way of looking at it.

10:14Stephanie Flanders:But there was another way which I got from talking to my Indian colleagues and our geoeconomics analyst in India, that it was entirely in line with Prime Minister Modi's own objectives. He needed to have a relationship with China because it's a key part of his manufacturing, domestic manufacturing agenda, that he needed access to these inputs from China and we could show how many inputs he relied on, etc, etc. It struck me that was true for almost every country there, that you could also just re-describe what they were doing as not putting two fingers up to Donald Trump, but pursuing their national interests in a world in which the US has, to some extent, stepped back.

10:47Stephanie Flanders:So how do you guard against that? That's an aspect of the same issue.

10:51Alessandra Galloni:Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. That's sort of another way of framing the too much focus on Trump. I think two ways. Firstly, you know, what is happening right now is a period of extraordinary uncertainty because we've got at least three massive great shifts going on in the world economy. One is the geopolitical shift, which is driven in part by the administration, but was also starting long before the rise of China, you know, the kind of authoritarian axis. There were big shifts going on before the Trump administration. Secondly, the huge economic shift, which again predated the sort of, I'm afraid, the sort of end of the unfashionability of the worldview of The Economist started long before Donald Trump became president.

11:28Alessandra Galloni:But he's taken it a step further with massive protectionist turn. And then the third one is the technological revolution, who wins the AI race. And all three of those are driving the world. And all three of those are driving what Prime Minister Modi is doing or Brazil is doing or any country is doing. And so you're right. If you only think of this through the prism of the US and through Trump, you're missing something. And one stat for this, I think the US is what you'll know exactly. I think there's a 16 % of global trade. It's a relatively small proportion. Of course, it's dominant in global finance.

11:58Alessandra Galloni:But that suggests that a lot of what is going on is actually external to the United States. And so we have to we have to absolutely make sure that we don't overemphasize the impact of this hyperactive and, of course, extremely important administration.

12:14Zanny Minton Beddoes:I completely agree. I think nobody doubts that. U.S. administration is important and what has been happening with issues like global trade, you know, geopolitics is no question something that we need to cover. But the risk is if we only cover it from the vantage point of the U.S., we miss what's actually happening in other countries, and we may find ourselves, to your point, about 10 years from now, 20 years from now or more, we may miss epical shifts in places like China and India because we've only been focusing on them as a result of the U.S. administration. And then equally, this counts on one of the key thing for journalists is to be open-minded.

12:50Zanny Minton Beddoes:You have to be open to the possibility that your ideas, your original idea, your original hypothesis is wrong. And I think that the mainstream press as we sometimes were called, has a certain view of this administration. And we need to be open to the possibility that the U.S. economy is not going to collapse because of what is happening, because that inflation is not going to be what people feared because of the tariff policy, that, you know, the institutions of the state of law, the institutions in the U.S. will not collapse necessarily, that they're strong and that they will last some of the attacks, right?

13:25Zanny Minton Beddoes:I mean, I mentioned before in passing some of the new attorney general's rules against leaks by journalists. Well, you know what? Actually, what it reversed was a policy of the Biden administration. It went back to a policy of the Obama administration vis-a-vis journalists. And so I think everybody was ready. So even though we are there in the rooms and we are fighting for press freedom, we also have to put it into context, right, and not criminalise everything that is done by this administration while standing firm to fact-check everything that is said.

14:22Stephanie Flanders:as the day gets going.

14:24Zanny Minton Beddoes:From Brussels, I'm following the politics, policy and the people shaping the European Union right now.

14:30Stephanie Flanders:And from London, I'm looking at what all that means for markets, money and the wider economy.

14:35Zanny Minton Beddoes:We've got reporters across Europe and around the globe feeding in as stories break.

14:40Stephanie Flanders:So whether it's geopolitics, energy, tech or markets, you're hearing it while it happens.

14:45Zanny Minton Beddoes:It's smart, calm and to the point.

14:48Stephanie Flanders:And it fits into your morning.

14:49Zanny Minton Beddoes:You can find new episodes of the Bloomberg Daybreak Europe podcast by 7am in Dublin or 8am in Brussels, Berlin and Paris.

14:56Stephanie Flanders:On Apple, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.

15:03Zanny Minton Beddoes:For decades, people travelled across the world to see John of God, desperate for cures no doctor could offer. And when they arrived, they saw things they couldn't explain. This is real. This guy's actually doing surgery and it's a miracle. I never believed that And miracles were real until that point. But behind those adoring crowds was something much darker. One of the reasons why I never went to the police is because I saw at least five or six men with guns everywhere he went. That was clear to me, like, close your mouth, don't open your mouth, don't say anything. I'm your host, Martina Castro.

Read the full transcript

15:41Zanny Minton Beddoes:And in the podcast Two-Faced, John of God, we'll look back on a man who claimed he could perform miracles and got people from all around the world to believe him. from Exactly Right and Adonde Media. This is Two-Faced, John of God. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

16:06Stephanie Flanders:I want to do a bit more on the economics, not least because this is going to be going out on my Trumponomics podcast, which you can get anywhere you get your podcasts. Maybe you should call it something different. I know, I can't speak about derangement syndrome under the name of the podcast. I think the closest thing to a consistent principle of Trumponomics as it's applied globally has been that the rest of the world should just pay for stuff that previously it got, quote-unquote, for free from the US. Whether that's reserve currency, security umbrella, a certain kind of global order. And I think the assumption at the beginning of the year might have been that countries were going to push back a bit more than they have.

16:48Stephanie Flanders:Have you been surprised, Annie, by how effective the administration has been short term at dividing and ruling?

16:56Alessandra Galloni:So first of all, I think your characterization is spot on. I think the best way of characterizing this administration, and people over the last few months have talked about, is it isolationist? Is it great power theories? It's not. It is essentially, the polite way is a kind of monetization of US hegemony. The less polite way is something about a mafioso shakedown. and you can take your pick which one you want to use. But that really is the common thread that goes through all of the administration's international economic actions. I'm struck, if you'd said to me in March, you know, just before Liberation Day, and you'd said to me, the Trump administration is going to increase America's effective tariff from around 2 % to about 19%.

17:37Alessandra Galloni:And it's going to have 50 % tariffs on countries like India and 35 % on Canada. I would have said the odds are we are going to go into some kind of 1930s style tit-for-tat trade war. There's going to be retaliation. And actually, you're right. The surprising thing is that two things happened. Xi Jinping retaliated and America caved. Very clearly, Trump realized that he couldn't win that. And then the other countries have essentially all tried to strike deals. And what we haven't had is a kind of collective, we're standing up to this. And so in the short term, you're right, it's been quite successful.

18:12Alessandra Galloni:I actually don't, I'm not at all sure it's going to be successful in the medium term. Because I think firstly, America loses out. I mean, I'm a card carrying free trader, and I believe that the country that imposes tariffs does lose out, the consumer does pay, it's not good for American competitiveness. And although it may not cause an inflation problem in the short term, in the long term, this is bad for the United States. And therefore, I think the rest of the world has shown very clearly that it does have no intention of going down this route. And so you will see greater coordination between different regional trade agreements.

18:43Alessandra Galloni:And I actually think, I mean, it won't be the WTO. It won't be the old system. But you will have something that resembles a rules-based trading system, increasingly excluding the U.S. And that is not good for the U.S. in the medium term.

18:55Zanny Minton Beddoes:The system has worked, ultimately. What you're saying is that global trade, to a certain extent, has worked because we've seen the deals that have been struck. You know, it has been a huge overhaul of the system. But we thought that there would be more of a dismantling.

19:09Alessandra Galloni:I don't know. I think the old system is broken. I think it is a new system. But I think that it is there. We will see a limit to the ability, even of the US, to shake down countries over the medium term.

19:20Zanny Minton Beddoes:I think this is the height of the shakedown ability. And China, as you say, was the one. There was no way that you could push further with China. And that's why he backtracked.

19:30Stephanie Flanders:Well, and as Annie points out, there's more than 80 % of global trade.

19:33Alessandra Galloni:Can I do some shameless self-promotion since this is going to be on your Trumponomics podcast? In return for coming to this conference, you may. Which is that, as you may know, next week we're launching the Economist Insider, a series of video shows on, there'll be specialist ones and I will co-host a weekly one. But the first episode will be along this track. And as part of it, I have an interesting conversation with Prime Minister Mark Carney on precisely this topic. So you should listen to it.

19:55Zanny Minton Beddoes:All right, watch this space. The other thing I think we should not forget is that a lot of Trump's policies that are ostensibly about economics or ostensibly about global trade or are actually about getting something else in the geopolitical sphere and that his linkage policy is very strong. They're what the king feels like. Exactly.

20:15Alessandra Galloni:This is a court with the king and the king likes his meat.

20:17Zanny Minton Beddoes:I'm going to put scenarios on you so that then you're going to stop, you know, sign a peace deal, right?

20:23Stephanie Flanders:Alessandra, do you actually think in this environment, I think we've all agreed that there's a kind of short-term getting along with the US, but long term, a real erosion of US position and potentially a vacuum into which other countries will move in. Do you think there's any scope for Europe to step up in this environment? I mean, there's a lot of pressure.

20:42Zanny Minton Beddoes:I mean, there's certainly scope. There's a big question as to whether Europe will. But I think another point, and I know we've reached the end, that I think we also shouldn't forget. Recently, actually, we were in the room together when we were talking to the former head of MI6, I think at Davos, in January. And one of the things that... I think this was off the record. That was, all right. Well, what I'm about to say is... Okay, I think he'd be... He's moving on. We're among friends. Among friends. No, but one of the things that I thought was very interesting is how much of an emphasis he put on the fact that leave aside the heads of these organizations, you know, the top organizations of the U.S.

21:21Zanny Minton Beddoes:and of the U.K., but that a lot of the work is done at the second and third level. And a lot of the relations, and he was talking about security, but you could extend this to many other areas, is actually done not at the top levels, and that the coordination and collaboration still goes on. And I was really struck by that because it suggested to me that, you know, administrations come and go and they are important, and this administration may lead to another same administration. We just don't know what's going to happen, right? but that actually between countries and among countries a lot of the work that that holds policies together is still is still going.

21:59Stephanie Flanders:And that is that is actually a lot of the concerns we have pretty much run out of time but I do want to just because you are also leaders of people and managers of people and this is a pretty fractious often emotive journalistic environment for particularly reporters in the U.S. to navigate and we've seen that in spades over the last few weeks. So I just wondered, both of you, how much have you had to think about that? Have you had issues with people, either with burnout or just people struggling to sort of hold that line? Because you both stand for objective, rigorous reporting.

22:36Alessandra Galloni:The answer is it is people feel very, very strongly about what's going on. I think we benefit from being, we don't have to, you know, we do different kind of journalism to you two so we have the time to discuss and debate and what's most important to me is that people feel their voices are heard and so we have lots of discussions about a lot of these subjects and we may end up often with leader lines that I perhaps I'm fairly sure some of my team don't agree with but as long as they've had their voices heard and I think it's people I mean I can speak for my colleagues they have been extraordinary in their sort of professionalism and the way that they have risen to the challenge, they understand that our role is to make sense of what is happening, explain it to our readers around the world, never, never compromise on our underlying values.

23:24Alessandra Galloni:We are a liberal newspaper, classic English liberalism. We proudly champion that. But you can do that and at the same time have fair-minded journalism that distinguishes between the signal and the noise. And I think everyone is completely on board with that.

23:36Zanny Minton Beddoes:We have a slightly different situation. You know, we're obviously on the sharp edge of a lot of what happens in the world and including in conflict. I mean, we've been talking about economics, but, you know, we have the other half of our newsroom, you know, is in war zones. We have many people in Ukraine, I mean, on battlefields around the world. So for us, there's a real imperative to keep our people safe physically all the time, and that is becoming increasingly difficult. I mean, it's no secret. I've been in this job as EIC for four years, and we've lost four journalists in conflict. So the physical remains very, very important because there are a lot of actual kinetic situations on the ground.

24:15Zanny Minton Beddoes:But to your point, which is more sort of the emotional aspect of it, no, it's very real. I mean, our journalists in the U.S. are feeling the same sort of pressures that many of our journalists in other countries feel. And so, you know, we do a lot of hostile environment courses. Those are mainly for physical protection, but increasingly we use a lot of mental health protection, you know, how to protect your mental health, how to keep yourself safe scrubbing your phone, you know, digitally. And we have introduced many, many more sessions on hostile environment writ large in the U.S. than we ever could have imagined.

24:48Stephanie Flanders:We're rolling out trainings that we've never before done in the U.S. And to your point, people who are in the Washington Bureau who have come from Latin American countries and others are finding this much more familiar territory. Okay, final very quick question. We've none of us managed to get sued, our organization, so far by the administration. will you be a little bit embarrassed if you're not by the end of the administration

25:11Alessandra Galloni:no i genuinely don't think about it i will be embarrassed if we haven't done the best possible coverage and that is if that leads to us being sued so be it yeah i mean are you expecting our

25:24Zanny Minton Beddoes:general counsel lawyering up our general counsel you know have plenty of work to do with all the investigations that we do and all of the countries we operate in so i think they've got plenty to handle.

25:35Stephanie Flanders:Alessandra Zanni, thank you so much for doing this.

25:50Stephanie Flanders:Thanks for listening to Trumponomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted by me, Stephanie Flanders, and I was in a conversation with the Reuters editor-in-chief, Alessandra Galoni, and the Economists editor-in-chief, Zanni Minton-Bedos.

26:07Stephanie Flanders:Trumponomics was produced by Sam Asadi and Moses Andam and special thanks this week to the organisers of the Women, Money and Power event at Bloomberg's headquarters in London. Sound design was by Blake Maples and Kelly Gary and Amy Keene is our executive producer. Sage Bowman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. To help others find the show, please rate it and review it highly wherever you listen to podcasts.

26:48Zanny Minton Beddoes:I'm Barry Ritholtz, inviting you to join me for the Masters in Business podcast. Every week, we bring you fascinating conversations with the people who shape markets, investing, and business. CEOs, fund managers, billionaires, Nobel laureates, traders, analysts, economists, everybody that affects what's going on in the market, whether you own stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, crypto, you really need to hear these conversations. Sometimes it's behaviorists like Dick Thaler or Bob Schiller. Sometimes it's fund managers like Peter Lynch, Bill Miller, Ray Dalio. Sometimes it's authors, Michael Lewis, author of The Big Short, and Moneyball.

27:33Zanny Minton Beddoes:Regardless of the conversation, these are the folks that move markets each week. That's the Masters in Business podcast with me, Barry Ritholtz. Listen on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

27:50Zanny Minton Beddoes:People who didn't do what John of God wanted them to do, they usually disappeared. John of God was once Brazil's most famous spiritual healer. But in this limited series podcast, we uncover the darker truth behind his global empire of faith and fear. From Exactly Right and Adonde Media, this is Two-Faced, John of God. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

This week, we're widening the lens a bit with a panel from the Bloomberg event "Women, Money and Power." Host Stephanie Flanders spoke with Alessandra Galloni, editor in chief of Reuters, and Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor in chief of The Economist, about how their news agencies are grappling with the sheer volume of news coming out of Washington and the Trump administration's aggressive approach to the media. They discuss press freedom challenges, the global impact of “Trumponomics” and how their newsrooms balance independence, fairness and resilience amid political and economic upheaval.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Trumponomics

All 71 episodes
Managing the News in the Age of TrumpTrumponomics · 23 min
Listen in VO