Brexit: Ten Years Later

22 Jun 2026 · 52 min · 25 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A BBC “Wake Up To Money” episode marking 10 years since the 2016 Brexit referendum, focusing on political uncertainty in Westminster (including speculation over Keir Starmer) and the economic/business impacts of Brexit and related cost pressures. It also covers US-Iran talks, oil prices, and knock-on effects for transport and consumer sectors.

Guests and backgrounds

  • Gary Hodginson, Director of Venture Seafoods (Bridlington), supplies fresh/frozen shellfish to the UK, Europe, and Asia; discusses SME export and operating-cost impacts since Brexit.
  • Jane Sydenham, Senior Investment Director at Rathbones; discusses markets, debt/interest-rate constraints, and investor concerns.
  • Steve Rigby, CEO of Rigby Group (UK tech company employing 3,500); focuses on business confidence, hiring, and government engagement.
  • Professor Michael Jacobs, economist and former advisor to Gordon Brown; comments on “Manchesterism” and public control of key services.
  • John Do, Professor of Economics at Aston Business School; trade/FDI analysis of Brexit effects.
  • Raoul Rapparel, Theresa May’s Special Advisor on Europe; former Brexit negotiator perspective.

Key claims (with examples)

  • Brexit uncertainty began before 2016; firms diverted trade and product lines during the 2016–2021 transition.
  • Trade with the EU fell: exports down ~17% and imports down ~25% (relative to counterfactual), with GDP loss estimates around 6–8% and investment/employment/productivity hits (e.g., investment -12%, employment -3%, productivity -4%).
  • Loss of product variety: “almost by half” (e.g., fewer cheese varieties).
  • FDI outflows: outward FDI down ~12% and not reversed by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
  • SME example: Venture Seafoods says Brexit increased export costs (though small vs total), but energy and employment costs rose sharply; diesel and “white diesel” for refrigeration/road equipment add pressure.
  • Manchesterism example: public control of buses in Manchester as a model; Jacobs argues similar public control in energy/water/rents/social care could lower prices and welfare costs.
  • Markets/debt example: high UK debt-interest costs constrain any new leader’s ability to borrow; higher yields could raise government borrowing costs and feed into interest rates.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Political Uncertainty and Business Impact

0:00 to 1:02

Discussion on how political speculation affects business decisions.

“This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.”

Political Uncertainty and Business Impact

2:21 to 4:28

Discussion on how political speculation affects business decisions.

“Welcome to Wake Up To Money on Monday the 22nd of June.”

Market Reactions and Economic Concerns

4:28 to 8:01

Analysis of market responses to political changes and economic challenges.

“I mean, that's the key short-term issue.”

Manchesterism and Business Engagement

8:01 to 11:47

Exploration of Andy Burnham's Manchesterism and its implications for business.

“I think we're in this transition period.”

Debt, Taxes, and Economic Stability

11:47 to 14:01

Discussion on the impact of debt and taxation on business and the economy.

“So I think, you know, give them the chance and let's see what they deliver.”

Economic Challenges Post-Brexit

14:01 to 16:19

Discussing the economic implications of tax and borrowing on the UK government.

“you're thinking actually the markets won't give any new leader, whoever that is, much room to spend.”

Investment and Workforce Dynamics

16:20 to 18:28

Exploring the challenges in attracting investment and workforce issues in the UK.

“Rugby Group, which employs 3 ,500 people in the UK.”

Political Stability and Economic Growth

18:29 to 21:08

Debating the role of political stability in fostering economic growth in the UK.

“you can't necessarily believe everything that AI is generating because I can see big differences where I know it's incorrect.”

Oil Prices and Market Dynamics

21:09 to 22:34

Analyzing the impact of oil prices on the economy and business operations.

“The new road will also be used to remove the trains and carriages involved in the collision away from the site.”

The Seafood Industry's Response to Costs

22:35 to 26:56

Understanding how rising costs affect the seafood supply chain and pricing strategies.

“to try and find alternatives to getting oil out rather than the Strait of Hormuz are likely to continue.”
Show all 25 chapters

Tourism Recovery Amid Political Changes

26:57 to 28:05

Examining the rebound in tourism as regional political stability improves.

“So all of our refrigeration equipment on the road vehicles is all white diesel now.”

Market Reactions and Initial Brexit Impacts

28:05 to 29:09

Exploration of potential changes in company ownership and initial market reactions to Brexit.

“I mean, it looks as though there might be a takeover offer, which would be a pretty big deal, I think.”

Market Reactions and Initial Brexit Impacts

29:10 to 29:22

Exploration of potential changes in company ownership and initial market reactions to Brexit.

“Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a 250 credit for the next one.”

Listeners' Concerns on Government Debt

30:20 to 31:31

Discussion of listener texts regarding UK government debt and its implications.

“Morning, the balance sheet in the UK shows our GDP is unfortunately only equal to government borrowing.”

Reflections on the Brexit Referendum

31:32 to 33:28

Guests reflect on their experiences and perspectives during the Brexit referendum of 2016.

“It was very much a moment of where were you when this happened?”

The Immediate Aftermath of the Referendum

33:29 to 34:29

Analysis of the immediate political and economic consequences following the Brexit vote.

“You know, we were always going to have to do things very differently after all that time.”

The Changing Landscape of UK Leadership

34:30 to 35:19

Examination of the changes in UK leadership and their impact on Brexit negotiations.

“that steers our country to its next destination.”

Economic Effects of Brexit: An Expert Analysis

35:20 to 38:09

Experts discuss the economic effects of Brexit and changes in trade relationships with the EU.

“I will shortly leave the job that it has been the honour of my life to hold.”

Negotiation Challenges and Political Sticking Points

38:10 to 42:00

Discussion on challenges faced during Brexit negotiations and the major political sticking points.

“And UK imports from the EU have dropped almost by a quarter.”

Brexit Negotiations and Economic Impact

42:00 to 43:54

Explore the initial Brexit negotiations and their economic implications over time.

“You know, it did get locked in, you know, quite quickly after Article 50 was triggered and around that time.”

Statistical Analysis of Brexit Losses

43:54 to 46:06

Discuss recent studies estimating the economic losses attributed to Brexit.

“I think the recent study of Blumen and authors published this year has calculated overall estimate of the GDP loss is about 8%.”

Understanding Business Uncertainty Post-Brexit

46:06 to 48:35

Examine how uncertainty affected businesses in the aftermath of Brexit.

“And we saw investment reduced by 12%, employment by 3%, productivity by 4%.”

Current Trade Relations and Future Considerations

48:35 to 53:53

Analyze the current state of UK-EU relations and possible future developments.

“Gary, when we talk about uncertainty, what did that look like for you and has your business changed in the last 10 years?”

Current Trade Relations and Future Considerations

56:00 to 56:22

Analyze the current state of UK-EU relations and possible future developments.

Exploring Cristiano Ronaldo's Life

56:31 to 57:00

Discover insights into the life and achievements of Cristiano Ronaldo.

“He's widely recognised as one of the greatest footballers in history.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:29CFO. LinkedIn has a word for that. Bull spend. Now you can invest in what looks good to your CFO. LinkedIn ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks. You'll reach the right buyers because you can target by company, industry, job title, and more. So cut the bull spend. Advertise on LinkedIn, the network that works for you. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a 250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast. That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. We all have routines. I'm Gibran and with diabetes, mine was finger sticks.

1:15Sometimes I skipped them because it hurt. The Freestyle Libre 3CGM changed that. It gives me glucose insights without finger sticks. Learn more at freestyllibre.us. Finger sticks are required if your glucose alarms or readings do not match symptoms or when you see check blood glucose symbol for the first 12 hours. The views expressed should not be used for medical diagnosis or treatment as a substitute for professional medical advice. Individual circumstances may vary. For prescription only. Safety info found at freestyllibre.us.

1:43BBC Sounds. Music, radio, podcasts. Wake Up To Money from BBC 5 Live. Hello, good morning, welcome to Wake Up To Money. All eyes are on Westminster as speculation grows about the future of Sir Keir Starmer. But what does that uncertainty mean for businesses making decisions on investment jobs and costs? Talks between the US and Iran have concluded overnight in Switzerland. We'll look at how markets have responded and... The British people have spoken and the answer is we're out. Yeah, we can't quite believe it either. But this moment was 10 years ago. Tomorrow, this morning, we're going to be looking back at Brexit.

2:20What happened at the time where the UK economy is now and what a refreshed relationship with the EU might look like in the years ahead. Wake Up To Money from BBC Radio 5 Live. Good morning. Welcome to Wake Up To Money on Monday the 22nd of June. It is four minutes after five o 'clock. Plenty to get through this morning. We've got Westminster watching and waiting. Businesses trying to figure out what it all means for their investment, their hiring, their costs. markets as ever, deciding whether they like the look of it or not. And that's all before we've even had our tea or even a bit of breakfast.

2:58We're also going to be looking at Brexit later on in the programme. With me this morning are Gary Hodginson, Director of Venture Seafoods in Bridlington. They supply fresh and frozen shellfish to the UK, Europe and Asia. And Jane Sydenham, Senior Investment Director at Rathbones. Good morning to you both. Good morning. It's a nice synchronisation there. Gary, I'm going to start with you. When you hear all this speculation about Sir Curse-Stormer's future, what does that sort of political uncertainty, how does that filter into your business? Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. It doesn't really. Same of the same, isn't it?

3:35If it's Burnham Street and I think they're all going to be, well, surely things can't be any worse than what they are now, can they? So we're probably going to see a softening of sterling, so that'll probably help our exports. But yeah, really, we just want necessarily what's best for the UK, don't we? Yeah, I mean, I'm going to have to pick up on that you say it can't get worse than what it is now. Are things bad for you, Gary? Not necessarily bad. The underlying business is good. But like most SMEs, we've just seen the last two years of every increase in operating costs. And that's all outside of our control, isn't it?

4:10So it doesn't necessarily matter how you're running your own business. It's all these decisions are made above us. Now Jane from a markets point of view how are investors looking at the UK this morning I suppose we're still waiting for the markets to open but was there anything going on on Friday for us to be aware of? Well, I guess it's, you know, obviously we're looking at what's happening in the Middle East. I mean, that's the key short-term issue. And hopefully, you know, there is a deal that has been agreed and will stick, which will keep the oil price coming down. I mean, it is down a bit this morning and let's hope it keeps coming down because that takes the pressure off inflation.

4:48It takes the pressure on the need to put up interest rates. So fingers crossed on that one. All right. Well, let's talk about it all. First of all, the political uncertainty. Speculation was mounting about Sir Keir Starmer's future after Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election last week. Downing Street says the Prime Minister's position remains unchanged and that he is determined to fight for his job. But here was the view of our political editor, Chris Mason, late last night when asked if we should expect to see a podium moment later. Yes, I think we probably are. We don't know for certain.

5:21We're into that zone and I've been through this now with quite a few prime ministers in the last four years where the phones go silent, but where there is stuff out there being reported, which in normal times, a Downing Street operation would shut down. I mean, not least today, the President of the United States saying what he said about the prime minister's future. And they are not doing that. Now, the precise timing, let's see. The logic around him doing it as soon as tomorrow morning would be, in many senses, but it's the last bit of agency he's got, really. That was Chris Mason there, ahead of a potentially very busy day for him.

5:55Definitely very busy. I don't envy him. We should be clear, though, there is no confirmation of any announcement from Downing Street as things stand. Of course, it is five in the morning. One thing we do know that is happening today, though, is the swearing in of Andy Burnham, former mayor of Manchester, new MP for Makerfield, and someone was widely said to be eyeing Sir Keir Starmer's job. So what does this all mean for British businesses? Let's talk to Steve Rigby, Chief Executive of the UK technology company Rigby Group, which employs 3 ,500 people in the UK. Steve, good morning. Good morning to you.

6:31When you hear all that, is it tough to make business decisions when there's possible changes at the top of government? I think we've somewhat got used to the changes. They've been rather frequent in the last decade. So another one we have to probably have a wry smile at. But, you know, in reality, you know, we've been desperate for quite some time for some stability. We know that stability breeds confidence. I suspect this is a quick transition it's been well tabled I'm hoping the disruption here is not as severe from a prime ministerial point of view as perhaps we've had in previous changes but I do fear about a major reshuffle more generally and the disruption that causes at a departmental level You're right to say we have had a lot of prime ministers but what is your concern then?

7:13What would feed into your business? Well I mean I think the primary concern is the style of business engagement from the government We've had a reasonably tough time in the business community on the back of the 24 budget. Things seem to have settled down somewhat. But, you know, words like or phrases like business-friendly socialism do concern. And certainly the selection of the chancellor, assuming that Rachel Reeves doesn't continue in that post, is really quite critical. So I think business-friendly socialism coupled with an Ed Miliband-style chancellor, you know, that would raise substantial concerns both in the markets.

7:49and I think in the business community. Now, when you say stability, can you give us a concrete example? Like where does instability show up? Is it hiring? Is it investment? Is it contracts? Is it just your overall confidence? I think we're in this transition period. Let's not forget we've got AI looming in the background, both as the single biggest opportunity to drive the economy and productivity and the single biggest risk that we faced in society for several generations. So we've got to make sure that we embrace this new world. I think business has reached its limit from a taxation perspective.

8:22We've got to lean into business. It is the only growth agenda out there for the country. And I think giving business confidence they can employ people and there aren't further changes coming down the road in some of the key areas like employment rights, like national insurance, is really key for the business community. Gary, I'm going to bring you in here. Steve was talking about stabilities and talking about investment. For you, what practical things would you be worried about? Would it be like export paperwork, energy costs, shipping, labour? All of them. All of them. Yeah, all of them. Because since Brexit, obviously our export costs have increased, but really they're very small in the overall product costs and price.

9:05But yeah, mainly energy costs, employment costs. It's generally all of our operating costs. Everything has increased, especially over the last two years. Now, we do have to be careful about getting ahead of ourselves, of course. Andy Burnham has several hoops to jump through before the black door of number 10, rather. But given the expectation, there is an interest of trying to understand what is advocacy for slightly woolly things like Manchesterism and business-friendly socialism. We've got Professor Michael Jacobs. He's an economist and was an advisor to Gordon Brown in number 10 and had this to say last night.

9:40I think the idea of Manchesterism is becoming clearer. I mean, there are actually two versions of that. One is business-friendly socialism, the property development, the attracting inward investment. But the thing that Andy Burnham has attached himself to is this idea that the reason the cost of living is going up and governments don't seem to be able to do anything about it is that we've lost control of some of the key prices that ordinary people feel in their household spending baskets. So buses is the obvious one. And he's done something about that by taking public control of buses in Manchester.

10:10And he would say, let's do the same thing in energy, in water, in rents, in private rents, in social care, sectors where there are private sector providers who are taking huge profits, not investing enough and raising prices. And he thinks that by taking those into public control, those kinds of sectors, you can get the investment that you want, but you can also lower prices, which lowers the cost of living and incidentally will lower the cost of the welfare state. Lower the cost of the welfare state. Steve Rigby, what do you think of Manchesterism? You can't not what Andy's done, I think. Whenever you visit Manchester now, it has a dynamic feeling about it.

10:46We shouldn't forget that Howard Bernstein was a long-term leader there. So he's built on very, very solid foundations. But I've got great pride in what Andy's done in Manchester. I think if we could replicate that in other parts of our country, that would be a very positive thing to do. And I think broadly the devolution agenda that he'll bring, I'm from the West Midlands, I really welcome some of those changes and allowing our local leaders to make more of their critical economic decisions. Yeah, Gary, I'll bring you in on this as well. Well, I mean, Andy Burnham has talked about re-industrialisation, public procurement, backing British businesses.

11:21Does that sound encouraging to you? Well, it sounds encouraging. It's all on the deliverance, isn't it? Because usually whenever this has been tried before, it's never really worked, has it? So when we look at locally, some of the projects that have taken place, when you see that done privately, it's done on time on budget. As soon as you take that away from the private sector, it just seems to be ever ongoing, more and more delays and ever increasing costs. So I think, you know, give them the chance and let's see what they deliver. I get a sense from you, you're kind of a little bit jaded by politics.

11:56We just got a text in there saying socialism has never worked anywhere. Are you just feeling like politics isn't working for me? It's not working for business at the moment. I don't think politics seems to be working for the large majority of the UK, if I'm being honest. So I think for me personally, I've never felt such a distance between business, between being a UK citizen and between politics. Now, over the years, we've known many politicians and that there's a lot of good politicians out there that are really working for the constituencies. But generally, you don't really see that type of politician making the cabinet, do you?

12:36So I just think, and the last two fisheries ministers, speaking to them personally at the seafood show in Barcelona over the last two years, unbelievable people, really know what they're talking about. But I was surprised how they honestly, truly believed that the Labour government was doing things to help and benefit businesses. And they were quite shocked when I was telling them that that's not the reality. So that's the feeling at the moment. There's just too big a distance between reality, I think. Jane, I want to bring you in on this, get a macro overview of it. If investors think a new leader means more borrowing or higher taxes, where would that show up first?

13:14Hmm. So the worry is we already have a very high level of debt today. And the rate of or the amount of interest that we're paying on that debt is extremely high, too. So there isn't much money to invest. I mean, everyone knows that we need to invest for the future to build businesses and change the direction of the economy for new industries and so on. But there isn't the money. And that's the really hard bit. You know, if the government wanted to borrow money or more money, we would see sterling fall. We'd see the bond market or rather the yield on guilt rise, as we did when Liz Trust was in power.

13:53So, you know, there's no room for manoeuvre. That's the hardest thing for any leader, whoever they are, from whichever party. So when you're hearing Andy Burnham talking about making life more affordable, putting money in people's pockets, you're thinking actually the markets won't give any new leader, whoever that is, much room to spend. I think that's right. And then his only other option is to increase taxes. Well, you know, at the top end of the tax spectrum, so the people who are earning most in the UK, we're paying more than any other developed country in the world already. So, you know, if the taxes go up further, the problem is it might scare people off and they start to leave.

14:36So, you know, he's really kind of caught whichever way he looks, really. It's not an easy inbox. Steve, when you listen to that and you hear borrowing costs could actually increase for the government, but also could feed into interest rates as well, would that feed into your own business? Yes, I mean, we have to be conscious of the markets. You know, we're spending 390 million a day on debt interest as a country. So any change on interest rates is clearly very material to the government. It's material for people's livelihoods in their homes. We've already got a property market going sideways. And I think the household market is a real indicator of consumer confidence.

15:14If people think their house is increasing in value, they'll invest in it. And that in turn drives the economy. So I think we have to be very conscious. And that's why I think a really careful selection of chance at this point is absolutely critical. What would you like to see in the coming months from anyone, whoever's in, as Prime Minister, whoever's in Downing Street? Yeah, we, the Labour entered government with arguably an underfunded tax system, but at 36%. We're going to exit already at nearly 42 % with everything that's been announced. So, it is becoming unthinkable that taxes can be raised further.

15:49What we need desperately is reform of the welfare system and reform of some other critical services. In business, were we to be against our backs against the wall. Our only option isn't to borrow more money. It is to make sure that we trim our sales accordingly to the conditions that we're in. That typically means some form of cost reduction, some form of transformation of your organisation. Government far too often hides away from doing that. But that's now absolutely critical in the UK. All right, Steve Rugby, Chief Executive of the UK technology company, Rugby Group, which employs 3 ,500 people in the UK.

16:24Thank you so much for joining us. now Gary I just want to come back to you on this I mean Steve was saying the UK is not attracting enough investment how do you feel about that? Yeah well it's difficult for our visiting because that's not really our business but looking from an outsider I would say why would you want to invest necessarily in the UK you're not necessarily hearing anything positive from the government anything welcoming all we've been hearing for the last two years on the news is that business is bad, wealth is bad, job creation is bad. So, yeah, let's start having some positivity and let's start talking the country up rather than talking it down because at the end of the day, we've got record tax take in 2025, record taxation now in 2026.

17:11So surely the damage is being done. So let's start trying to turn things around. He also mentioned AI. Does that come into your business a lot? People are quite worried about jobs in this market as well. and the fact that hiring costs are a lot more, that it means that businesses like yourselves are deciding, I can't afford to take on another staff member. Well, affording to take on staff members is one thing. The next thing is actually finding good, reliable staff that will actually turn in consistently. And that is our major struggle, really, given the fact that the welfare system is so generous now, where is the incentive for people to work?

17:51So we've got some incredible staff. But trying to build on those numbers has been quite difficult for a number of years now. And this hasn't just happened in the last two years. This has been a multi-generational problem, I think. And it's just been building and building. And that's something I strongly believe. When I left school, I went straight into work at 16. So I think that's, for me, that could be the real change. And we're using AI slightly, but not really. A lot of what we do is still manual labour. So, yeah, we're using AI, but you have to double check it all the time whenever I've been using it, especially some of the information that AI, you can't necessarily believe everything that AI is generating because I can see big differences where I know it's incorrect.

18:39Yeah, that's true. You do always have to double check it, don't you? Don't go to your boss with something that you've just put together with AI. You might get in trouble. Jane I want to bring you in on this because the idea was not necessarily about AI but I mean the idea of political instability and investment but it's really the big question around this how are we going to get the UK to grow again? It is. That's the most important question of all. And it is partly it is about stability and a sense that, you know, the government will work with any inward investors or anybody investing from overseas.

19:22But in the end, we have got to get the economy to grow because we can't keep putting up taxes. Yes, we can sort of cut the welfare state. I mean, there's a lot of talk about that. But that isn't going to get the economy growing. We've still got to find ideas and ways to make it grow. Here's an interesting one for you, Jane. UK's official statistics body, the ONS, has admitted a fresh error affecting a key labour market data survey after missing around 1 ,200 interviews. And you've got the Bank of England rate decision. It's closely tied to these figures as well. So we're talking about growth. We're talking about all these things.

19:59But does this really raise new questions about the reliability of these figures? And maybe we're shooting in the dark here a little bit. I think to some extent that is true. And we do need accurate data to help guide the management of the economy. I mean, it's interesting, even in the United States, the new Federal Reserve chair is kind of improving the way that the central bank looks at the economy, looks at interest rates and looks at statistics and so on. And it looks as though we really do need to do the same thing here. We need to get an accurate picture in order to make the right decisions.

20:33All right, Jane, you stay right there and you too, Gary. We're going to move on to a really big story over the weekend. Commuters who use the Midland main line through Bedford are being asked to work from home after Friday's fatal rail crash. The line between Luton and Bedford is closed until Sunday and there's expected to be a substantial disruption to train services. Here's our business correspondent, Simon Browning. The recovery operation after Friday's fatal train crash in Bedford is now underway and it is going to be a huge process. Network Rail has confirmed that they are building a brand new road at the side of the crash site to allow engineers and inspectors to get better access to where the collision happened.

21:13The new road will also be used to remove the trains and carriages involved in the collision away from the site. Huge cranes arrived by rail on Sunday as well. Now there's going to be huge disruption for the rest of the week to train services between Luton and Bedford, as that part of the Midland mainline will remain closed. A reduced service of trains on Thameslink will leave from London St Pancras to Luton, where those services will end. And if you're travelling south on East Midlands Railway, all services will terminate at Bedford. There will be some rail replacement buses provided, but the advice is to work from home if you can, with the Transport Secretary even saying to avoid travelling entirely.

21:48Ticket restrictions have been changed to help people take alternative routes for the rest of the week. Simon Browning there. Now, the US-Iran talks concluded in Switzerland with Tehran saying it had secured waivers for oil and petrochemical exports. Iran had announced it had shut the Strait of Hormuz because of Israeli strikes in Lebanon. And though tracking data shows vessels have continued to pass through it. Let's talk about the price of oil first. Jane, where are we at? It's below 80, but it just keeps dropping now, doesn't it? It does. I mean, at the moment, it looks as though we're down about 1.5 % or so at 79.30, so thereabouts.

22:26You know, and if there's a sense that this will hold, then the oil price is likely to continue to fall further. because one of the interesting things is that some of the strategies that have been put in place in the Middle East to try and find alternatives to getting oil out rather than the Strait of Hormuz are likely to continue. So, you know, Iraq is keeping its Syria oil route open. Saudi Arabia has been using a pipeline. You know, the UAE is talking about building ways of pipeline to get oil out without using the Strait of Hormuz. So lots of different contingencies may well continue in case this happens again.

23:09So that's likely to keep downward pressure on the oil price if the conflict is genuinely over. What would traders need to see before oil really drifts back towards pre-ward levels? I mean, is it about the straits staying open? Is it about that shipping traffic normalising? Or perhaps a final deal where there's like no number on it, you know, 60 days, 30 days, etc, etc. I think all of those things, it's likely to sort of drift back down just because of sentiment, but to really sort of go back to where it was, all of those things really need to happen. So at the moment, the war premium, I guess it's out.

23:47But do you think that perhaps investors might be too optimistic? Because at the end of the day, it is still a bit, it's always moving with them, isn't it? It's never set in stone. We still have that number, the 60 days. We haven't just had a final deal. that's absolutely right and i think the other thing is what we've got to remember is it takes oil 45 days from the point at which it's taken out of the ground to actually get to market so you know that physical shortage will carry on for quite some time even if all of those positives from a deal that we just talked about were delivered today so the squeeze on supply goes on for a bit longer uh it'll take a while for that to work its way through now gary you You supply seafood into the UK, Europe, Asia.

24:35So when you hear about oil prices or these shipping lanes, the Strait of Hormuz, all of it, does that become quite real for your business? How has it affected you? Well, again, I think it affects everybody now, doesn't it? Oil price, everything seems to be dictated around the oil prices, all our packaging, our transport costs, and then shipping products globally. We've seen an increase in container charges. but it'll be interesting to see how quickly that oil price starts to come down because as soon as oil price rises we see it pretty much in our bills within a week whereas when it starts to decrease it seems to take several months.

Read the full transcript

25:12Now last time you were on Gary you were talking about how the Middle East conflict was affecting your costs and I guess how you had to pass on some of those costs to customers. Are they understanding of those pressures or is it still very hard to pass them on? no customers customers are understanding whether that be in the uk and europe or or globally but at the end of the day people are looking at some doing for us in in seafood as we increase our sales price we see a decrease in sales so it's that it's that balance isn't it because we work it's a small margin product for us anyway we're a small margin business so we we don't have much wriggle room all we generally try and do is find efficiencies and work even harder.

25:55So, yeah, oil price, obviously, energy costs are just crazy for us in the UK, any business, any household, really. Now, when there is that kind of uncertainty, can you actually plan around it? Or do you just have to kind of take the differing costs as they come? Or you're essentially waiting to see what price lands in front of you? Yeah, and generally we're buying our energy two years in advance. So luckily, at the moment, We're not, you know, it's still significant, our energy costs, but not listening to some businesses I speak to. And all the time, we're always looking at how we can become more efficient.

26:31But again, you can become more efficient and then you can actually, your production numbers can decrease. But especially on the catching sector for us, because it's a wild-caught product, all UK vessels, their major main overhead after crew wages is diesel costs. and then anybody on shore now, especially in construction and so on, some of our machinery, we used to be able to operate on red diesel. Now it's all white diesel. So all of our refrigeration equipment on the road vehicles is all white diesel now. So yeah, energy costs just affecting everybody in the UK. Now, another part of the story is that countries whose tourism industries have been hit due to their proximity to strikes in the Middle East have been experiencing something of a rebound as chances rise of a long-term peace deal at the US-Israel war with Iran.

27:20Jane, does that make sense to you? People are kind of also hedging their bets in terms of where they're going on holidays. Yes, yes, it does. I mean, I think everyone was pretty worried before, but of course now it looks as though there is a peace. Then the bookings are picking up sharply and the share prices of all of the travel companies and airlines have certainly been bouncing quite sharply over the last month. You've had 2E up about 10%, Jet2 up 17%, EasyJet up 45%. There's a big response to this already. And speaking of EasyJet, there could be a big deal coming this week for EasyJet or not.

28:04Absolutely. I mean, it looks as though there might be a takeover offer, which would be a pretty big deal, I think. The UK's got used to that independent company. so whether or not the brand changes I guess that will continue but it will be a big change of ownership there Ever invest in something that seemed incredible at first but didn't live up to the hype? Like those$5 roses at a gas station or a second-hand piece of technology that breaks in the first 10 minutes? Marketers know that feeling We optimise for the numbers that look great impressions, reach and reacts But when they don't show revenue, well, that's a not-so-great conversation with the CFO.

28:51LinkedIn has a word for that. Bull spend. Now you can invest in what looks good to your CFO. LinkedIn Ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks. You'll reach the right buyers because you can target by company, industry, job title, and more. So cut the bull spend. Advertise on LinkedIn. The network that works for you. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a 250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast. That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. I'm here on the job site with Dale, who's a framing contractor. Hey, good morning.

29:34Dale traded up to Geico Commercial Auto Insurance for all his business vehicles. We're here where he needs us most. Yep, they sure are. We make it easy for him to save on all his insurance needs, all in one place, with coverage that fits his business and bottom line. Oh, I shouldn't have looked down. It's all right. We're so far up here. Look at me. Take a deep breath. No, I'm good. So good. Get a commercial auto insurance quote today at geico.com and see how much you could save. It feels good to Geico. Wake Up To Money from BBC Radio 5 Live. Good morning. If you're tuning in, welcome to Wake Up To Money.

30:09Thank you so much for tuning in to us this morning. We have been talking about political reaction. Could be a change in Westminster. But we're going to be moving on to Brexit soon. We do have a few texts in on that though. Just go through a few of them. Morning, the balance sheet in the UK shows our GDP is unfortunately only equal to government borrowing. Is it irrelevant who our new PM might be? Our country is broken and the cracks have widened considerably since Brexit. Well, we're going to be talking about that was for Kev in Newcastle. Good morning. Would you please ask your guests on this morning's programme, speaking about the economy, what do they understand government debt to be?

30:47Should government debt always be reduced or can it sometimes be increased for good economic reasons? Many thanks, Neil. Jane Sydenham, I'm going to ask you that question. I can't answer it. Well, it would be good, I mean, if we do reduce debt and normally what happens is if we're growing strongly, then the government raises more taxes just because companies are growing, not because they're increasing the rate of tax. And that money can be used to reduce the debt. So pay off the debt like we pay off our mortgages. So absolutely government debt can come down. Unfortunately, it's only been going one way, particularly since Covid, but it can definitely come down.

31:26There you go. Jane Stenham, always good for economic lessons. Thank you so much. But we're going to look back at the last decade since the Brexit referendum of 2016. It was very much a moment of where were you when this happened? And we're going to be reflecting on the politics of the time, reviewing how our society and the economy essentially has changed since then. So we do want to hear your thoughts. Get in touch with us. Text 85058 or WhatsApp 08085 909693. Get in touch or if you're on social media, use the hashtag WakeUpToMoney. Gary, where were you 2016? at this time 10 years ago? With my head in my hands.

32:07It's interesting. I think a lot of fishermen would have been pro-Brexit. Yes and no. So my background is purely shellfish. So Bridlington was quite a significant whitefish part in its day, Grimsby, Hull, places like that. And then it turned over to shellfish in the 90s and I think around 2020, I think 86 % of shellfish caught in the UK was exported, with a majority of that going into the EU. So from a shellfish perspective, we had absolutely nothing to, as an industry, we had absolutely nothing to gain from Brexit. It was more, but fishing being an emotive subject, on the whitefish perspective where there's a quote and negotiations with the EU, that was a different matter.

32:52That was my problem really during all of that campaign period, is that I think fishing only equated for 0.2 % of GDP. But emotively, the amount of people had told me they voted to help me, to benefit me, and it didn't benefit us as a business or an industry, not one bit. Interesting. Jane, were you working that day? I was. I was, yes. We'll get into the economics of it all later, but I remember it quite vividly, kind of really just watching it and saying, oh, okay. So do I. thinking, oh, this really is a big change, you know, after 43 years in the EU. You know, we were always going to have to do things very differently after all that time.

33:36So, yeah. Right. OK, well, let's go back in time, get into our time machine, because tomorrow will be 10 years since the UK held a referendum on its membership of the European Union. Many of us will remember the official announcement of the result on BBC News. We are absolutely clear now that there is no way that the Remain side can win. It looks as though the gap's going to be something like 52 to 48, so a four-point lead for leaving the EU. And that's the result of this referendum, which has been preceded by weeks and months of argument and dispute and all the rest of it. The British people have spoken, and the answer is we're out.

34:17And the UK would not officially leave the EU until three and a half years later, on the 31st of January 2020. but the impact of the decision was immediate. I do not think it would be right for me to try to be the captain that steers our country to its next destination. Now having called the referendum himself and then campaigning to remain, David Cameron was the first to go if fell to Theresa May to negotiate a deal to leave the EU. She hoped that her deal would give rise to a bright future. Future generations look back at this time. They will judge us not only by the decision that we made, but by what we made of that decision.

34:58They will see that we shaped them a brighter future. They will know that we built them a better Britain. But it was not to be. She too was forced to resign the decades since the referendum has been one full of debate and negotiations continuing right up to the present day with as many as five prime ministers coming and going in the intervening period. I will shortly leave the job that it has been the honour of my life to hold. I want you to know how sad I am to be giving up the best job in the world. But them's the brakes. Given the situation, I cannot deliver the mandate on which I was elected by the Conservative Party.

35:42But I leave this job honoured to have been your Prime Minister. There you go. Now joining us to discuss what the last decade has meant for businesses in the UK is John Do, Professor of Economics at Aston Business School and an expert on trade and international business. Good morning. Good morning. Hi, good to be here. Oh, it's great to have you. And we've also got Raoul Rapparel, who served at Theresa May's Special Advisor on Europe during the first round of Brexit negotiations. He's now UK Chief Economist at Boston Consulting Group. Good morning to you. Good morning. Now, Jundu, I'm going to start with you.

36:18The vote happened in 2016, but the new trading arrangements didn't really bite until 2021. So when did the economic effects start showing up, do you think? You might be surprised. The economic effect, in fact, happened even before 2016. Economists studied this quite rigorously. By now we have an excellent body of research showing how exactly things have evolved. And actually the expectations of this Brexit has happened before 2016. And the specific effect happened during that four and a half years uncertainty. So we already saw trade has been diverting and especially the firms exporting new stuff.

37:00So the new kind of product line they've never done before and those already moving towards the EU right before the TCA came in. Now, what does it look like now? Because you look closely at trade data. What's actually changed in the UK-EU trade since 2016? Oh, it's been a journey. And it's for the economists who have been following this, and as we do, we did estimation of nine months after January 2021, 18 months, two years and three years. and we're about to publish the five years review until almost the end of 2025. It's not rosy, I have to say. A lot of economists have done similar work, and we have been following closely the trade in terms of exports and imports between the EU and UK.

37:46You might know that one of the studies estimated before the TCA to say that we're going to have 8 % drop of trade, but that figure by now has been doubled at least. So estimated up to October 2025, relative to the counterfactual, you know, what would happen if Brexit didn't happen? We see the UK exports to the EU have dropped around 17%, you know, give and take, and that can vary, but, you know, around that number. And UK imports from the EU have dropped almost by a quarter. Wow. John has some stark numbers there, Raoul. But you were advising Theresa May during those negotiations. When you hear those numbers and those clips that we maybe brought you back, does it feel like yesterday or just another political lifetime ago?

38:35I think a bit of both, to be honest. It feels like a long time ago in many ways. And so much has happened since then in terms of the UK and geopolitics, etc. But yes, it still feels very vivid and like yesterday in many ways. At the start, did people in government understand how complicated it would be and 10 years later, we'd be where we are now? I think people understood it would be complicated. I'm not sure people thought it would quite take as long as it did to negotiate. I think the part that probably ended up taking a lot longer was for us as the UK to agree internally what we thought our best approach would be, the difficulty in getting things through parliament and then obviously layering the negotiation uncertainty and difficulty on top of that.

39:21So I think we knew at the start, at the outset, in kind of 2016 post-referendum, early 2017, that it would be complicated and it would take some time. But I think the time altogether, when you look across, you know, negotiations, implementation, et cetera, has taken probably six, seven years. That was probably longer than people expected. Yeah, for sure. Remind us what the sticking points were, because I'm sure a lot of people kind of forget. And also, they weren't always necessarily the ones that people expected after the referendum. What were the ones that surprised you the most? well I think after the referendum and in a end of 2016 early 2017 when we started scoping out the negotiations and and obviously we couldn't talk to the EU until after the election until we've after officially triggered article 50 so there was a lot of kind of sort of back channeling and trying to figure out what the issues would be I think at the time the real concern was you know around the financial settlement and our withdrawal from the EU budget and how much that would cost and whether the EU would ask more than we were willing to pay and and that was seen as being a big flashpoint in negotiations and i think at that time you know it wasn't obvious that the issue around northern ireland and the the eventual backstop and the protocol would become you know probably the biggest sticking point and it wasn't until we got into you know early well say late 2017 um and we really got into the negotiations and we came towards the point of the joint report and sufficient progress if people remember that whole thing um which which then became clear that actually Northern Ireland, how we managed the border, how we agreed that during the withdrawal agreement negotiations was going to be the most difficult point and the sticking point.

41:00So it was, you know, people can look back and say it was always going to be a big issue. But I think there was a sense at the time in at least 2017, early on, that that was soluble, that, you know, UK and the Republic of Ireland would find a way that would work for both. But actually, in the end, that became the biggest sticking point. And that shifted quite a lot during negotiations. And obviously this was all added to at the time by the fact we went from from having you know a majority to not having majority because of the 2017 election it seems like there was almost a sequencing problem that you had to overcome because there was the withdrawal first and then there was the future trade relationship negotiations later yeah and i think that was another uncertainty you know i think in 2016 there was a hope that actually this would all be done you know in parallel and that we'd be talking about it all at once and and maybe that might have made the whole thing of it easier if you can see what the end destination is while you're trying to negotiate the path there um but obviously that wasn't to be and the eu was very strict and clear on the sequencing of negotiations so they wanted to agree the withdrawal agreement uh first and and get all the kind of divorce proceedings as they became known um sort of sorted and and then we could discuss the future relationship and i think while that was always seen as a possibility and and something to probably avoid from the UK perspective.

42:17You know, it did get locked in, you know, quite quickly after Article 50 was triggered and around that time. And I remember coming back off the election in 2017, you know, we had just not won the election. And then within a week, we had to go to Brussels to do our first round of negotiations. And it was still all up in the air in our perspective about how this would look. But the EU had a very clear view and was able, partly because of, I think, the uncertainty around the government and the lack of kind of strength of the government to push back against the negotiation sequencing to land that and lock that in.

42:51And that obviously really shaped what happened over the preceding years. Now, John, I'm going to bring you back in here because you have all the trade data at your fingertips. We do have a text in saying, any debate on leaving the EU needs to also include how much money has been saved and the benefit with respect to the COVID vaccine. And isn't the EU economy doing worse than the UK economy? I mean, it is an interesting point to make. Critics would say a lot of things did happen at the time, particularly around 2020, COVID, inflation, energy prices, war in Ukraine, et cetera, et cetera. We could go on.

43:22So how do we know that, you know, the trade hit is just Brexit rather than everything else? Well, I think such arguments are valid. I think a valid concern that, you know, the future policy making and negotiations have to take into account. And it's indeed EU is weaker now than five years ago. But overall, I think the statistics and economic estimates are very clear. The loss is simply such a substantial number relative to, you know, whatever the figure, you know, we might pay. I think the recent study of Blumen and authors published this year has calculated overall estimate of the GDP loss is about 8%.

44:04So, you know, if you calculate that, that's an incredible number. So, you know, all this amount of money we pay, paying into the EU, in the end, we're translating to opportunities, investment, the certainty. And not to say that, you know, the size of the market, which is, you know, largest consumer market and the sophisticated one next to us. So overall, the economic message is very clear. But we also know the Brexit was never just an economic issue. It's primarily a political issue. So I would say that, you know, indeed, we have to tread carefully. We probably need to consider various considerations and the conditions, if ever we're going to talk about going back in what terms.

44:47But overall, being part of the single market is absolutely beneficial. Now, Jane, markets reacted very sharply at the time. Sterling fell, I mean, it dropped off a cliff after the vote, didn't it? But at the same time, 10 years on, the city hasn't collapsed. In some ways, financial services have been more resilient than a lot of people predicted. So is that a fair point to make? Well, yes. Jane, sorry. Go ahead. No, no, I think it is. I think one of the things that we know is that business always innovates its way. It finds its way around problems. So and I think, you know, the city and various businesses have done that as far as they possibly could.

45:29So I think it's been better than the worst case scenarios for that reason. But obviously, you know, it could have been much better if we'd had continued to have that free access. Now, as various changes as a result of Brexit have been implemented, we've talked to a lot of businesses in Wake Up To Money having to deal with the impact. But it's interesting. There's an overall picture as well. And it's good being able to look at it in a 10 year process. And actually on Friday, a group of economists published a new analysis of Bank of England data suggesting that by the end of 2025, Brexit had reduced UK GDP by 6 to 8%.

46:05And the study suggested the impact accumulated steady over time. And we saw investment reduced by 12%, employment by 3%, productivity by 4%. June, you've done some of your own research on this. How does that compare? We have focused on trade, trading goods and FDI. I think for the trade figures, it's larger. And just now I mentioned to you about the export and imports effect that we have estimated about 17 and 23 percent. But then, you know, we usually don't talk about the varieties. Consumers love cheaper price, but also large varieties. And we have lost a lot of varieties. So think about in the past, we have cheese of any kind, whatever you want to add.

46:52But now, for example, we would have less. And for the same reason, EU consumers would have less of the British cheese either. So we have lost product variety almost by half as an estimate we have found. So in that sense, the welfare loss is very clear. But in addition to that, we have estimated outward FDI has been gone out since the Brexit referendum in a very considerable way. And 12 percent you just mentioned, that's also one of our estimate. And we found the TCE introduction did not reverse that. So until today, we still see the investment going out of the UK and that trend hasn't reverted.

47:34Raoul, from inside government, how much was that economic cost of uncertainty understood at the time? yeah I think it was understood I mean I think when you look back at the forecast that we made you know the government published in 2018 a long-term economic analysis and the forecasts were similar at headline level in terms of the effects that we've been talking about here and that economists have made since I think what is different is that trade was seen as the primary sort of channel for the economic impact back then I think as you've mentioned uncertainty and the hit on business investment and particularly domestic business investment was much more significant than I think people were forecasting back in sort of 2017, 2018.

48:14And I think just that paralysis also affecting everything else. So, you know, the lack of ability to do anything beyond Brexit and the negotiations, the implementation, you know, there was very little other policy going on. Government and I think business were spending a lot of their time preparing and thinking of different scenarios. and I think that created obviously a wider economic paralysis in the country and you know when you look at the trade data we've heard a lot of the figures about trade with the EU there but it's also worth noting that you know the UK's trade the US in goods has performed just as badly if not I think actually worse than our trade with the EU over this period so you know that wider paralysis and and the challenges have sort of gone wider than just trade with the EU so I think that uncertainty was was I think understood but I think it ended up probably being larger in terms of its long-term impact and the kind of wider impact on the UK as an economy and on our politics as well in terms of trying to find a path forward.

49:10Gary, when we talk about uncertainty, what did that look like for you and has your business changed in the last 10 years? Well, the uncertainty at the time was just, I do remember after the referendum, just as a business, we were at a crossroads so we either decided to to pivot find a way of operating find a way of around all the procedures and carry on trading or we we ceased trading with the eu so we made that decision to continue heavily involved in a lot of the trade bodies and steering groups workshops the negotiators were incredible i think they need they need to take a lot of their credit so yeah I think I think we've got a way of working now obviously there's some costs there's some time involved in that but yeah to undo 47 years of a working relationship was never going to be straightforward and never going to be easy but yeah the demand in the EU is as strong as ever for UK products the biggest barrier I think to entry into the EU is just purely the cost of the product now, the cost of operating business in the UK.

50:18There you go, Raoul. You got a little compliment there from Gary. Let's go to today and the current situation because we've got the Labour government seeking to try to reset relations with the EU, particularly within the context of a trade environment dominated in the last year by President Trump's tariff policies. And then earlier this year, Chancellor Rachel Reeves told the BBC's economic editor, Faisal Islam, that the government would look to align with the EU if it was in the UK's interest. We are not burying our head in the sand. We are not immune to the damage that Brexit has caused. And we are trying to rebuild relations.

50:53And yes, where alignment is in our national interest, we should align with European rules, where that is good for business and where it is good for jobs in Britain. But a report by the House of Commons Business and Trade Committee of MPs today warns a gap between rhetoric and reality when it comes to the government's reset of relations. Raoul, where do you think we go from here? Well, I think that ultimately, if the key aim is to address some of the economic impacts we've been talking about, then fundamentally, there needs to be a grappling with, you know, the red lines that have been set out and been discussed over many years in terms of the single market and customs union.

51:29I think the reset, yes, there are things that can help on the margin, but fundamentally, they don't address the things that have caused the kind of economic impacts and diversion in trade. So that's the first thing that, you know, there needs to be a grappling with that if that's the direction the country wants to go in. I guess we also need to be realistic and think about what is negotiable. You know, there's been a tendency over the past kind of decade to discuss internally what is acceptable and desirable for the UK. And that's necessary. But often that then ends up not being, you know, kind of negotiable or acceptable to the EU.

52:00And I think the EU has been pretty clear that, you know, if you want to be in kind of a closer relationship, whether that's a single market or the customs union, that there are tradeoffs and prices attached to that in terms of budget contribution, free movement of people etc and then i think we also have to recognize that you can't go backwards you know as we've talked about businesses have made investments they have made changes there are ongoing frictions but i think we should also think about what does the future look like rather than assuming that things will go back to the way they were because i think as we talked about you know fdi out of the uk into the eu has gone up and that at a macro level reflects what we see at the granular level which is that businesses have made investments into the eu to avoid some of the trade frictions.

52:42Now, just because we might change the relationship doesn't mean businesses will go back to how it was before. Obviously, businesses like Gary's have ongoing friction and it will help them. But I think we just have to think of all of these things in the round if we actually want to have a serious debate around what comes next. And I'm not sure we're quite there yet. And we're still at risk of thinking too much internally rather than what is negotiable and practical for business looking forward. Jun, Raoul makes a really good point there. We can't go back. Economically, what would a meaningful reset actually look like?

53:18Well, I think we need to recognise the progress we have made. I think since last year, the first time summit between the UK and EU, I think the progress has been made and the government has been trying to push the SPS agreement, linking the electricity markets and sorting out the energy trading schemes, as well as negotiating the use of mobility. So these are the conditions that hopefully will be cleared this year. I think what we really need to be thinking about is what's next. I think the governments probably have been treating this as a kind of responsive and passive kind of actions to deal with problems, rather than agenda setting and thinking about industry strategy.

53:59I think at the moment we are presented with a kind of interesting opportunity because the EU is incredibly weak considering it's going to rise in the trade war with China. The trade deficit is increasing. We're going to have to leave it there, sadly. Thank you so much for joining us, Raoul Perl, as well. Thank you for joining us. I'm Gary Hodgson and Jane Sydenham, Senior Investment Director at Ratbones. And that is it from Wake Up To Money. Wake Up To Money from BBC 5 Live That's it from Wake Up To Money You can download the podcast every Monday to Friday So please make sure you subscribe We'd also love it if you left us a review When you do, get in touch Keep the conversation going any time as well On social media, use the hashtag Wake Up To Money He's widely recognised as one of the greatest footballers in history He's won the prestigious Ballon d 'Or award five times.

54:58He's the all-time leading goal scorer in professional football. And according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, he's the first active footballer in history to achieve billionaire status. Guess who we're talking about yet? That's right. Good Bad Billionaire is exploring the life and fortune of football icon Cristiano Ronaldo. That's Good Bad Billionaire from the BBC World Service. Listen now wherever you get your BBC podcasts.

55:26Ever invest in something that seemed incredible at first, but didn't live up to the hype? Like those$5 roses at a gas station, or a second-hand piece of technology that breaks in the first 10 minutes? Marketers know that feeling. We optimize for the numbers that look great, impressions, reach, and reacts. But when they don't show revenue, well, that's a not-so-great conversation with the CFO. LinkedIn has a word for that. Bull spend Now you can invest in what looks good to your CFO LinkedIn ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks You'll reach the right buyers because you can target by company, industry, job title and more So cut the bull spend Advertise on LinkedIn The network that works for you Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a$250 credit for the next one Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast.

56:25That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. He's widely recognised as one of the greatest footballers in history. He's won the prestigious Ballon d 'Or Award five times. He's the all-time leading goal scorer in professional football. And according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, he's the first active footballer in history to achieve billionaire status. Guess who we're talking about yet? That's right, Good Bad Billionaire is exploring the life and fortune of football icon Cristiano Ronaldo. That's Good Bad Billionaire from the BBC World Service. Listen now wherever you get your BBC podcasts.

From the publisher

Ten years since the Brexit referendum, Leanna Byrne hears how businesses have fared. Elsewhere, businesses react to political turmoil at the top of government.

More from Wake Up to Money

All 187 episodes
Brexit: Ten Years LaterWake Up to Money · 52 min
Listen in VO