Musk's "innovation engine"

3 Feb 2026 · 53 min · 28 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Wake Up to Money - Episode Summary: "Musk's Innovation Engine"

Podcast Overview Title: Wake Up to Money Description: News and views on business and the world of personal finance, featuring the latest from global financial markets. Episode Date: February 3, 2023

---

Episode Highlights

  1. Elon Musk's Mega Merger
  2. Merger Details: Elon Musk's companies, SpaceX and xAI, merge, creating the most valuable private company ever, valued at over $1 trillion.
  3. Market Impact: Discussion on how this merger could influence the tech landscape, particularly in AI, space exploration, and internet services.
  4. Expert Insights:
  5. Emma Wall (Hargreaves Lansdown): Discusses investor confidence in Musk and the importance of the merger for future IPO plans.
  6. David Keane (Origo): Views the merger as a strategic move towards AI and space, highlighting the efficiency gains from operating data centers in space.
  1. Government Action on PFAS ("Forever Chemicals")
  2. Announcement: The UK government unveils its first-ever plan to combat PFAS contamination.
  3. Industry Response: Outdoor clothing brands like Rab are already phasing out PFAS and are working towards safer alternatives.
  4. Key Points:
  5. Tim Fish (Rab): Emphasizes the need for legislation to catch up with industry practices and the importance of consumer education about new materials.
  6. Nishma Patel (Chemical Industries Association): Discusses the complexities of PFAS use and the need for alternatives that do not compromise product performance.
  1. The Future of Disney
  2. CEO Transition: Bob Iger is set to step down, raising questions about Disney's leadership and direction.
  3. Performance Review: Disney's recent financial results beat expectations, although future guidance remains cautious.
  4. Expert Commentary:
  5. Luke Stillman (Madison & Wall): Discusses Disney's strengths in sports advertising and the potential impact of changes in streaming service pricing and competition.
  1. Tourism Developments in Rome
  2. Trevi Fountain Charges: Introduction of a €2 fee to access the viewing area of the fountain to manage over-tourism.
  3. Expert Opinion:
  4. Michael O'Regan (Glasgow Caledonian University): Questions the effectiveness of the fee in reducing tourist numbers, noting that the cost is minimal compared to overall travel expenses.

---

Key Concepts and Discussions

Elon Musk's Vision

  • Investor Confidence: The belief in Musk's ability to innovate and lead is crucial for investor backing, particularly given his history of successful ventures.
  • Long-term Impact: Investments and innovations from these merged companies are expected to unfold over decades, affecting various industries beyond immediate consumer benefits.

PFAS and Environmental Concerns

  • Regulatory Framework: The government’s action plan seeks to assess, manage, and educate about PFAS, addressing their environmental persistence and health impacts.
  • Industry Adaptation: Companies are urged to innovate and find viable alternatives that maintain product quality while protecting public health and the environment.

Disney's Strategic Position

  • Market Adaptation: Disney's performance amid a changing media landscape reflects broader trends in consumer preferences and advertising dynamics.
  • Leadership Dynamics: The transition in leadership raises questions about the company's future direction, particularly in content strategy and audience engagement.

Tourism Management

  • Overtourism Solutions: The introduction of fees as a means to control tourism flow raises ethical and practical considerations about accessibility and visitor experience.
  • Public Perception: Strategies to manage tourist behavior must consider both economic factors and the preservation of cultural heritage sites.

---

Conclusion In this episode of "Wake Up to Money," the discussions encompass significant mergers in tech, environmental policy changes, corporate strategy in entertainment, and innovative approaches to tourism management. Each topic reflects broader economic trends and the interplay between corporate actions and societal impacts.

Listener Engagement

  • Feedback and Interaction: The podcast encourages listener interaction via social media, fostering ongoing conversations around these pivotal financial and economic developments.

---

*For more insights and updates, subscribe and listen to "Wake Up to Money" on BBC Sounds.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Discussing the SpaceX and XAI Merger

0:45 to 1:46

Exploring the implications of SpaceX's acquisition of XAI and its potential impact.

“We'll discuss where the company might be heading there.”

Expert Insights on Elon Musk's Strategy

1:46 to 2:23

Insight from investment strategist Emma Wall on Musk's market influence and future plans.

“So fortunately, we have Hargreaves Lansdale's Chief Investment Strategist, Emma Wall, with us this morning.”

Understanding the Value of the Merger

2:23 to 3:26

Discussion on investor confidence and the valuations of SpaceX and XAI.

“SpaceX taking over XAI, what's the first thing that springs to mind for you?”

Challenges of Private Business Valuation

3:26 to 4:52

Analyzing the difficulties in assessing the value of privately held businesses like SpaceX.

“I certainly get lost in the trillion here, trillion there.”

Future of Technology: AI and Space

4:52 to 5:56

David Keane discusses the intersection of AI and space technology and its implications.

“You do have other quite high profile private investors.”

The Role of Data Centers in Modern Technology

5:56 to 7:03

Exploration of the increasing need for data centers in the context of AI and space operations.

“Well, I think it's a really smart move, actually, because one thing that Elon does is he looks forward.”

Data Needs for Autonomous Vehicles

7:03 to 8:14

David explains the data requirements for the future of autonomous vehicles.

“And I think he sees the future there and not potentially in the car business.”

Energy Solutions for Space Data Centers

8:14 to 10:01

Discussion on energy needs for space-based data centers and the potential use of nuclear power.

“So that's only going to be a massively growing market.”

Long-Term Prospects for Cost Reduction

10:01 to 12:19

Emma discusses the long-term timelines for cost reductions in energy and technology.

“It's quite something, David, for us to get our head around and Elon Musk has very much got his head around it.”

Investor Sentiment on Musk's Controversies

12:19 to 14:00

Analyzing how Musk's political activities affect investor confidence and backing.

“Is there any prospect anytime soon that this is going to help alleviate the price increases that people have seen in recent times?”
Show all 28 chapters

Investor Sentiment on Musk's Political Actions

14:00 to 14:45

Explore how Elon Musk's political activities impact investor sentiment towards Tesla.

“And, you know, depending on what's going on in the market at the time, at the moment, you know, investors are willing to pay for that vision because they've seen him execute it before.”

Tesla's Performance and Musk's Influence

14:45 to 17:49

Discussion on Tesla's market performance and the potential impact of Musk's leadership changes.

“which we've, you know, just within the last year, we've seen him address rallies organised by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson here in the UK.”

Long-Term Visions for SpaceX and Tesla

17:49 to 18:25

Investigating the long-term implications of Musk's ventures into SpaceX and Tesla.

“of Tesla when it opens later this afternoon, kind of UK time.”

Elon Musk's Business Synergy

18:25 to 21:10

Understanding how Musk's various companies leverage shared technologies for success.

“whether it's space exploration or adaptation of industry into space or whether it's AI in general.”

Disney's Current Market Position

21:10 to 27:55

Analysis of Disney's financial performance and its strategic direction under Bob Iger.

“Right, more to come from Emma and David.”

Introduction to AI and Musk's Ventures

28:00 to 28:34

Discussion on Elon Musk's ambitions in AI and space industries.

“Do let me know what you're thinking is on that.”

EU's Post-Brexit Reset Signals

28:34 to 29:48

Exploration of the EU's openness to the UK's reapplication for defense funding.

“I've been hearing on Wake Up To Money this morning what that actually might mean.”

UK's Customs Union Rejoining Discussion

29:48 to 31:43

Analysis of the UK rejoining the customs union and its implications.

“who began by asking him whether a less reliable America meant the UK and the EU should now be closer?”

Business Perspectives on Customs Union

31:43 to 34:16

David Keane discusses the impact of customs union rejoining on his business.

“The customs union is that arrangement between those European Union countries that the UK was once in, where effectively goods and services can move tax tariff free between those countries.”

The Need for Practical Solutions

34:16 to 35:05

Exploration of the necessity for practical cooperation between the EU and UK.

“and the ability to trade freely and move those goods with lowest possible cost.”

Government's New Framework on PFAS

35:05 to 35:39

Discussion on the UK's new plan addressing forever chemicals (PFAS).

“about taking practical, good solutions that are beneficial for both parties.”

Understanding PFAS and Its Risks

35:39 to 38:06

Insights into the properties of PFAS and the action plan to mitigate risks.

“And part of the plan is to encourage safer alternatives for everyday items that rely on these chemicals.”

Industry's Transition Away from PFAS

38:06 to 40:46

Tim Fish discusses the outdoor industry's shift away from PFAS chemicals.

“and it's great that they've got timelines related to each of these actions in terms of when they're going to be delivered.”

Consumer Education and Product Longevity

40:46 to 42:00

Challenges of educating consumers on new product care without PFAS.

“Does it mean that customers need to expect a product might not last as long as it did before and might not quite do the job that these chemicals were doing before?”

Understanding PFAS Challenges and Opportunities

42:00 to 44:42

Learn about the complexities and opportunities surrounding PFAS chemicals in various industries.

“People are more aware of things working differently.”

Discussion on Political Misconduct Claims

44:48 to 45:04

Explore the allegations involving Lord Mandelson and their implications on government transparency.

“Nishma Patel, Policy Director at the Chemical Industries Association.”

Concerns on Outdoor Clothing Durability

45:06 to 47:16

Delve into discussions on the quality and longevity of outdoor clothing made with recycled materials.

“after Lord Mandelson was accused of passing on sensitive government information to the financier Jeffrey Epstein.”

Tourism Management at Rome's Trevi Fountain

47:17 to 51:13

Examine the new fee for accessing Trevi Fountain and its potential impact on tourism.

“Three coins in the fountain, each one seeking happiness.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Wake Up To Money from BBC5 Live. Hello, welcome to Wake Up To Money. Blimey, today we have got the biggest merger between two companies on record. That's what's being reported as SpaceX, one of Elon Musk's businesses, takes over another one of his businesses, XAI, merging the rockets, the space internet, the social media platforms and the chatbots like Grok as well. We'll talk about what his plan is for this trillion dollar and more company. We're going to talk about the government unveiling its first ever plan to tackle PFA, so-called Forever Chemicals. We'll look at outdoor wear businesses that are phasing them out.

0:42We'll hear who will become perhaps the new Disney chief executive this week. We're waiting for that. We'll discuss where the company might be heading there. And does this remind you of somewhere? Three coins in the fountain. The Trevi Fountain in Rome has started charging two euros to get up close. On top of the coins tourists typically throw into the fountain for good luck, we'll hear from a tourism expert about this controversial decision. Wake Up To Money with Sean Farrington. Good morning to you. Welcome. Wake Up To Money on BBC Five Live on this Tuesday morning, the 3rd of February. It's just after five o 'clock and we are digesting this mega deal.

1:26Always wondering what Elon Musk is thinking, how it might impact the world of tech, the way we work, internet services, the future of artificial intelligence, moving from car manufacturing to robotics, all of this. And when we wake up to trillion dollar deals being done, we need to get into the detail of all this. So fortunately, we have Hargreaves Lansdale's Chief Investment Strategist, Emma Wall, with us this morning. Emma, very good morning to you. Good morning. And in the world of tech and AI, David Keane is the Chief Executive of Origo, which develops and makes a range of automated baggage handling systems and vehicles for use in airports.

2:06David, good morning to you. Good morning, Sean. Good to be back. Yes, thank you for coming back, David, as ever. And same to you, Emma. It's always appreciated when people return, isn't it, when you offer an invite again. Emma, let's get into what this is really all about. When you see this headline this morning, SpaceX taking over XAI, what's the first thing that springs to mind for you? I think Elon Musk is not done yet. You know, it's interesting. When you ever see, you see trillion in a headline, it's often related to Elon Musk. So you may remember tail end of last year, he had his trillion dollar pay approved.

2:45And it's because of the sway and the influence that he has in this area and the belief that his investors have in him that he's able to do these mega pay deals and mega business deals. This is a lot to do with integration and it's a lot to do with control. When you invest in a business that Elon Musk runs, you really are investing in his genius. And he has long spoke about his intention to take SpaceX public with an IPO. And so this combined entity makes for a more efficient, a more profitable potentially, and definitely a more valuable IPO as he looks forward to kind of taking the business public.

3:26So what do investors make of this? I certainly get lost in the trillion here, trillion there. You can't quite fathom how much that actually is. But for investors, it's really important what these companies are worth. And for people who have their money being invested into various businesses where big investors around the world are sort of deciding what to do with individuals' money. Are these good deals? Are they worth what the numbers we're going to be reading about today say? SpaceX is worth about a trillion dollars. This deal tells us XAI, which is his artificial intelligence company that has the chatbot Grok.

4:05It also owns that social media platform X, formerly Twitter. Remember that as well as part of that. That's worth about a quarter of a trillion dollars. Do these numbers add up? Do investors have confidence in him? It's a really good question. And it's one of the challenges with privately owned businesses. So if these two were public listed businesses, as soon as this deal was announced, you and I would be able to look at the stock market and see what global investors thought of the deal, because invariably what would happen to the publicly listed shares is they would go up or down in value. When you'd have two privately owned businesses, even those as ginormous as this, the information availability is just not as great.

4:46And obviously the liquidity, as in the number of people trading these shares, is much smaller. So Elon Musk is not the only one who owns parts of these businesses. You do have other quite high profile private investors. So you have people like Cathie Wood, who is a long term kind of frontier technology investor who has spoken quite publicly about the genius of Elon Musk, who's invested in SpaceX, but it's all done privately. And so these valuations, really, we do have to take Elon, his valuers, his auditor's word for it, because there is no yet public market way of valuing these businesses. But as I said, The intention is very much from Elon Musk to IPO, this combined mega entity, potentially even later this year.

5:31David, when you see this deal being done, it's been mooted a bit in recent days. We've got confirmation of it now. From somebody who very much, you know, you're at the heart of a world of merging technology and productivity and actually implementing it in our day-to-day lives for businesses to use. What do you make of what he's trying to do here? Well, I think it's a really smart move, actually, because one thing that Elon does is he looks forward. And if you look at what's happening in his car business currently, he was way ahead and has been ahead for a very long time. But unfortunately now, with Chinese manufacturing vehicles at much lower prices and also a little bit of brand problem with Tesla, with his involvement with political activities he's been doing recently.

6:26I think he's seen that cars are quite tricky to do. There's a lot more competition. And actually, he's way ahead in the space race, way ahead of the Chinese or indeed anybody else. And he's obviously looked at all of this and thought, you know, the future of massive revenue, massive profits is going to come out of space and AI. And it's a smart move putting data centres into space because you don't need as much energy. It's pretty cold in space. And therefore, it is possible to run those far better than it is on the ground. So he's staying ahead. And I think he sees the future there and not potentially in the car business.

7:08How do these businesses, David, maybe they already have some link to what you do already, or even the concept of what he's trying to do here, merging a space business with an AI business. How might that have a ripple effect and affect a company like Origo and how you go about what you do? Well, I think our company, Origo, obviously is developing and deploying these autonomous vehicles for baggage, cargo and people movement, particularly at airports. And one of the things that we rely on is large amounts of data being moved around, whether it's from vehicle to vehicle or vehicle back to some sort of central control.

7:51Now, most of it is done locally at the airport for cyber and security reasons. But we do have a situation where we need a lot of data crunching and that's only going to increase. And if you look at companies like us, we are really hungry for data centers to crunch or hold data. So that's only going to be a massively growing market. And I think if you look at any ground based data center, it's going to need a tremendous amount of energy. And where is that energy going to come from? So and you need that energy because these things run hot. you need a lot of cooling and that's a lot easier if you can do it in space.

8:38And as I say, he's ahead of the race in that particular department. So, you know, providing that for companies like us, connectivity, data, massive amount of storage is going to be the future. Where are the data centres that you rely upon at the moment? Well, we have multiple data centres. So pretty much every area around the world that we operate, We have a local data center. And at the moment, that's been provided by Amazon Web Services or a local telco like Singtel or Rogers or whatever in the country, you know, working with one of those data providers. and at the moment it's good enough but as companies like us develop I mean you can imagine at the moment we've got one or two vehicles in different locations around the world on these proof of concept trials wait till the airports are running 500 or 1000 vehicles each and that is a lot of requirement for data and data storage so that this world is coming and it's coming really quickly.

9:46So I think it's a smart move. How he implements it, I don't know right this minute. But if there's one thing Elon does, he breaks through those barriers and he has an ability to raise large amounts of capital. And, you know, IPO-ing the company will allow him to do that. I was just wondering, as you were describing that, where we were at with nuclear power in space at at the moment and just seeing that the Telegraph have been reporting this week that Rolls-Royce actually is stalling on its moon nuclear reactor plans. It's quite something, David, for us to get our head around and Elon Musk has very much got his head around it.

10:28He's plotting future communities on other planets and in space and having industries dotted around our solar system, it But the idea that this, David, can be done in space and can be done safely, and actually this isn't that long away. No, I think that's right. The notion of having people on different planets and all that sort of stuff. Yeah, that's great. But actually, I'll be long gone before any of that materialises. But I won't be long gone before we have data centres in space. And you raise a very good point on small nuclear reactors. That is going to be the way that we can provide the amount of energy that we need.

11:19So although he talks about solar in space, you know, to run a big data center or multiple data centers still requires a lot of energy. And actually, you know, utilizing small nuclear reactors is probably the way to go. And you can see in America that the American government has already started to put a large amount of money into bringing small nuclear reactors up as fast as possible. So I think that's really good for the UK. You know, companies like Rolls-Royce who are in the vanguard of that, I think that's really a massive opportunity. Emma, all of this stuff costs a lot of money. And we hear about potential long-term ambitions of what this might bring, reducing costs for data centres and the energy around it.

12:10But for the end user, for people who, whether it's the energy bills on their home or the cost of doing business, the cost of the products that they're buying, Is there any prospect anytime soon that this is going to help alleviate the price increases that people have seen in recent times? Is there anything in this that households might think, great, this could actually take that weight off of the cost of everything being so much more than it once was? I mean, the short and flippant answer is no, because you're right, the benefits are not going to be coming for multi-decade. And we've seen this with Elon Musk's other ventures as well.

12:51You know, Tesla was incredibly ahead of the curve, but the valuation preceded the reality. So, you know, the market believed in him before we saw the benefits of EVs. You know, the market believed in his autonomous vehicles before we saw them on the roads. I mean, and that is the kind of, you know, he's a complicated character with quite a lot of complicated emotions towards him. But that is part of his genius, his ability to look, unlike many CEOs who exist in a sort of three to five year business cycle, he looks multi-decades ahead. That does mean, however, from in terms of, you know, the real life benefit that we look to experience, as you say, in terms of household energy bills, it is multi-decades ahead.

13:36But also that valuation is multi-decades ahead. And so actually, you know, when SpaceX lists later this year, and it's rumoured to be June because, and here's another insight into the complexity of his character, that is the month that the planets of Jupiter, Venus and Mercury align, which is very rare. And he likes that sort of thing. You know, that valuation will be based on a vision that is multi-decades out. And, you know, depending on what's going on in the market at the time, at the moment, you know, investors are willing to pay for that vision because they've seen him execute it before.

14:10But it is definitely not your typical business cycle. And Emma, the issue that David mentioned with Elon Musk around his political activities and how that may well have hit the Tesla brand at times. When you talk about investors backing, what they're effectively doing is backing the genius of Elon Musk. Does anybody raise large concerns and do any big investors think we're not going to back him because we don't particularly agree with his political approach? which we've, you know, just within the last year, we've seen him address rallies organised by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson here in the UK.

14:53He's had many controversial comments about the United Kingdom Elon Musk has. Besides, does that ever play into investors' decision making? Yeah, very much so. So if you look at sort of the publicly listed shares of Tesla, which is sort of the biggest way that we can test investor sentiment, Tesla is one of the largest businesses in the world and part of that Mag 7. But it did have a rather different experience to the rest of the Mag 7. So those are those magnificent seven large AI and digitally enabled US companies, the largest of which being Nvidia, particularly outside of the US. So it actually began prior to the election of Donald Trump on his campaign rally, where you had some sort of, you know, very high profile rallies.

15:45As you're talking about, there's the chainsaw incident. There's some of his comments about Democrats. He's also had hold some pretty right wing views around, you know, he's been rumoured to be sort of anti-trans. Affected less so sales in the US, but certainly we did see sales of the actual electric vehicles and comments around whether people would be buying the shares in Europe and the UK. And at one point, sort of Tesla sold, you know, hardly any units in Europe. And a lot of that was reported to be down to sort of change in sentiment. That has improved since he's distanced himself from the sort of MAGA community and Donald Trump.

16:28They obviously had quite a high profile X-based falling out last year. And, you know, so that has sort of improved global sentiment towards him. But we definitely did see an impact. Richard's been in touch, Emma, asking, where does this leave Tesla? Once Musk moves on, he says. I don't know what he means by moves on necessarily, but what does it mean for Tesla? Yeah, well, I mean, the reason why people invest in Tesla, you know, is Elon Musk in the same way that the reason people will invest in SpaceX. What I would say is he has been running multiple companies, multiple large companies with highly ambitious roadmaps for decades.

17:11This is what he does. So I don't think the IPO of SpaceX and the combination of these two businesses necessarily means he will not have the bandwidth for Tesla. But it is an interesting point because if we find out through the IPO that he has any intention to step back from Tesla or have any succession planning at Tesla because he does feel that his energies are best placed at this new$1 trillion company or$1.25 trillion company, then that could impact the market sentiment towards Tesla. And you might see an impact on the share price. So it will be interesting to see what happens to the share price of Tesla when it opens later this afternoon, kind of UK time.

17:54But so far, he has proved that he has had the bandwidth and the ability to run multiple businesses. So it's only if he signals intent to step back that I think that there will be any impact on Tesla. David, will all this improve our lives? Well, not in the short term, I don't think, unless you're going to invest into SpaceX and you might make some money out of it. But I don't think it will. I think this is more of a long-term play and it's part of the evolution of where we're going with all sorts of things, whether it's space exploration or adaptation of industry into space or whether it's AI in general.

18:40But I think at the moment it's a watching brief on all of this. 85058, please keep your thoughts coming in on this. Some really interesting questions coming in, messages, thoughts and says SpaceX and XAI and trillions of dollars. Is this science fiction or reality of life on Earth? Gavin saying that describing Tesla as a car company is wrong. It's a robotics company. Elon Musk has even stated this himself. He's more clever than people think. Cars and humanoid robots are to get people used to them. But the form factor of these is not the most efficient. And I'm sure these form factors will change in the next five to ten years.

19:18Gavin says 85058. What do you think? Another saying, who's this Will in Brighton saying, like him or not, as he's a divisive character, the world needs Elon Musk. Seems the planet is going to need much more energy, says Will. Thank you. Do keep those thoughts coming. I mean, fascinating developments as Elon Musk merges a couple of his biggest businesses. Sounds like a very casual thing to say, doesn't it, Will? And then you say, oh, it's a trillion dollar space business that puts rockets up into space. gets internet services from their Starlink. Some people might be familiar with that. And then he's just merged that with his AI business that's worth a quarter of a trillion dollars and has the Grok chatbot, the X social media platform in it as well.

20:07I mean, Emma, what does it mean for X and social media? We've forgotten all about that. That used to be the big controversial story about his plans for it. I think it still is pretty controversial, particularly in the UK, as we're kind of working out what regulation, it may or may not have fallen foul of. But it is all part of his plan. You know, the technologies that he utilizes on X are the same underlying technologies that he uses across many different of his businesses. And I do think this is part of the reason why he is such a successful businessman is he uses different entities to sort of test, you know, robotics, test algorithms, test, you know, technologies, which then benefit kind of the multi-sphere, the multi-businesses.

20:52So, you know, the AI implementation that you've seen in X, which has been very controversial, you know, is the sort of AI technology that you'll see him utilise to build efficiencies across all of his businesses. So I wouldn't count out X. I think it's still part of his kind of core strategy. Right, more to come from Emma and David. A few weeks ago, Disney's Zootropolis 2 became Hollywood's highest grossing animated film of all time, crossing the£1.3 billion mark. There's a snake! Stop in the name of the law! I'm really sorry. Stop pulling my ears, stop pulling my ears. Never pull a bunny's ears.

21:34There was much excitement in the library at the weekend when the kids spotted a Zootropolis 2 book on the shelves. Yesterday, Disney beat market expectations for their first quarter results for the first three months of its financial year. It didn't stop the stock price falling after the announcement. So apparently softer than anticipated guidance for the second quarter of the year. So maybe not the enthusiasm that some were hoping for. And people expecting Disney to be in the news plenty later this week. The company preparing to announce its new chief executive. So the veteran Bob Iger set to step down.

22:07Luke Stillman is the managing director at Madison & Wall Strategic Advisories and Advertising and Media Analyst. Luke, morning to you. Where's Disney at at the moment then? Good morning. So I think the key takeaway here is that Disney's results on the ad front were pretty good. From our perspective, we are in a structurally weak TV ad environment. So flat is the new up for most TV broadcasters. In that environment, Disney's 5 % underlying ad revenue growth is surprisingly strong. What is it that they've been doing that has meant they've surprised a few people? I think there are a few dynamics going on here.

22:51Number one, sports leading the way for them, 10 % ad revenue growth. Sports is increasingly the anchor of all TV consumption. It's all consumers want to watch. Sports content rights are one of the last truly valuable TV assets. So that's certainly driving growth. And just on that, Luke, just to keep you on the sport thing for a moment. Here in the UK, if people think Disney, they think Disney Plus, and in terms of how they might consume this stuff. And they wouldn't necessarily, in the UK, associate that with sports. So can you just explain how it is so important to Disney and where in the business it is?

23:32Yeah, so I mean, Disney, of course, owns ESPN, which is a huge portion of their sports advertising revenues. But they have properties all over the world. I think everywhere what we're seeing is the same dynamic for consumers where entertainment properties see less and less viewing as people shift to streaming, shift to social media. And sports is really one of the last big live events holding attention on TV. Incredible that. And so when you look at what Bob Iger has done, because he's had a bit of a story with Disney over the years as well, what changes has he made after returning to the business?

24:14Is it fair to say turned it around? Would this have happened without him? I don't know if it's fair to say turned it around. I feel like what we've seen over the past few years is Disney focusing on investing in content, trying to reinvigorate the TV and film production businesses. But it's a tough underlying environment there. Most of the positive performance in Disney comes from the experience part of the business now, the parks, the resorts, the cruises and the consumer products. And how would Disney be impacted by what's going on with Warner Brothers and Netflix potentially being the buyer of Warner Brothers, something we've much discussed on this program, this huge blockbuster deal that could well be being confirmed in the next coming weeks and months.

25:14Is Disney in a strong position to go up against whatever happens there? it's certainly going to concentrate the competitive landscape but i think the thing that disney's most watching there is really the consumer appetite for even more expensive streaming bundles if net if netflix and warner have a netflix hbo combination for 40 a month or 50 a month you know how many consumers actually bite at that that'll tell disney how hard it can pushed the prices on its bundles of Disney Plus and Hulu and ESPN. Feels like, Luke, I don't know if it was the same in the US, but those days of a$4.99 subscription, whether it's in pounds or dollars, could well be in the distant past.

26:03Well, one thing we've seen actually is on the streaming front, ad revenues really aren't growing the pie. They just cannibalize those dollars that would have been spent on linear TV advertising. But subscription prices keep going up. They grew by 13 % this quarter. And we think there's a big misconception out there that streaming growth has to come from ad growth. We think it's just the opposite, that ad growth is going to be really tough, but there's plenty of room to run on prices. Streaming platforms are still one of the best bang for the buck cost per hour of entertainment products out there for consumers.

26:47So everybody complains about price increases, but we think there's more to come on that front. Do people complain much about the adverts once they've already paid a subscription? Because again, there was a bit of a thinking as a household that if you were paying for something and actually subscribing to a platform, that you wouldn't have adverts. Whereas now, sometimes you get really caught out you you stick your film on or your episode on that you wonder that you've already subscribed to and whatever streaming platform it might be and then you've got to sit through a two-minute ad or 10 minutes in there's an ad and then the other 10 minutes in there's an ad are we grumbling about that i certainly everybody's grumbling but i think consumers consumers speak with their wallets and every time prices go up or a platform cracks down on password sharing.

27:36Everybody complains, but nobody cuts their subscription. So I think more prices to come and we expect consumers to continue to absorb them. Luke, great to talk to you. Thanks for your time. Luke Stillman, their managing director at Madison and Wall Strategic Advisory. Your thoughts, 85058. Are you up for spending a bit more on those streaming services if you spend any at all at the moment? Do let me know what you're thinking is on that. Much more discussion to come about over tourism, talking about what's going on in Rome a little bit later, but a conversation that we've certainly had about places around the UK as well.

28:14It can be a hot topic in certain parts. And any more thoughts on artificial intelligence and what Elon Musk wants to somehow achieve by merging his trillion-dollar rockets business with his just a quarter of a trillion-dollar AI Grok social media platform X business as well? a mega deal. I've been hearing on Wake Up To Money this morning what that actually might mean. Wake Up To Money from BBC Radio 5 Live. Good morning. Wake Up To Money on BBC 5 Live. Your thoughts on the future of artificial intelligence, where we get our energy, industries in space, life on Mars, all of that ambitions of Elon Musk as he merges his multi-billion, multi-trillion dollar companies that we're waking up to this morning, his space business merging with the AI business as well.

29:05We've chatted about that at length on Wake Up To Money. Have a subscribe on BBC Sounds if you missed that a little bit earlier. Let's hear some interesting comments from the commissioner, the EU's economy commissioner, in the strongest signal yet of a post-Brexit reset. He has been saying that the EU is open to the UK for a reapplication to a major defence industries fund. Valdis Dombrovskis told the BBC the EU also had an open mind on the UK debate about rejoining the customs union as well. The comments follow talks in London hosted by the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, who said the UK and the EU should speak with one voice on global economic issues.

Read the full transcript

29:47The Commissioner was speaking to our very own economics editor, Faisal Islam, who began by asking him whether a less reliable America meant the UK and the EU should now be closer? Well, the world has definitely changed and that certainly requires a cooperation of like-minded partners like EU and UK. And that was exactly the subject of our discussions today. OK, well then let me ask the difficult question, which is about the defence agreement, SAFE, which should be low-hanging fruit, should it not? And yet the UK was sort of frozen out having wanted to participate because of a large bill required.

30:25And now we understand that there's an attempt to join the second round of this safe arrangement. Are you encouraging of that? Is that going to happen? We're open for further discussions and we know that Prime Minister Starmer has expressed interest actually to come back to this issue and there's certainly openness from EU side for this. There is a very active conversation, I'm sure you're aware of it, within UK politics, within the governing party about the UK rejoining a customs union. What do you make of that? Well, I cannot now jump on conclusion, but I can say that we are ready to engage with an open mind and seek those areas of cooperation.

31:03Sure, but could you see mutual benefits in a closer single market relationship? Certainly there are mutual benefits. The best mutual benefits are within the single market, but we are currently not quite there. Yes, yes. But there could be some middle ground there, some give and take maybe? Yeah, with the middle ground, that's why I was mentioning this point, that a single market comes with four freedoms, free movement of goods, services, capital and labour. It's not possible to pick and choose, say, oh, we want free movement of goods, but we don't want free movement of labour. So that is the EU's economy commissioner there talking about, well, he was talking about the single market at the end there, as he explained, when we talk about the EU having an open mind to the UK rejoining the customs union.

31:55The customs union is that arrangement between those European Union countries that the UK was once in, where effectively goods and services can move tax tariff free between those countries. David, who's with us this morning David Keane, Chief Executive of Origo which makes those automated baggage handling system and vehicles for use in airports David, when you hear that conversation about us rejoining the EU's custom reunion would that make much difference to your business? Well, yes it would I mean a lot of these are all caveats around what actually the deal would be, but your guest listed out four parameters as well as the customs union.

32:47Yeah, that was for the single market. That's an even closer relationship with the EU, isn't it? It is, yeah. But the fourth thing he actually said, which is causing us a bit of a problem, is the movement of people and the ability to work within Europe. And, of course, we've got lots of European projects, We're working with Swiss ports at Zurich Airport. We're working at Schiphol Airport in Holland. And I can tell you to get our people the permits to actually work and do projects there on the ground is horrendous. Really tricky to do. So I know the gentleman said you can't pick and choose, but I actually think you can.

33:34And I think there's benefits from both sides. And I think one of the problems we've got here is that you've got, what is it, 29 countries or so in the union. And the problem here is that it's not set up, in my view, correctly. and the problem is if you give license to one country to do something, then all the other countries will say, oh, we need to do that as well or we need some variation. And that is the fundamental problem with the European community at the moment is that you can't actually get what you really want. And what we really want is we want free movement of goods and the ability to trade freely and move those goods with lowest possible cost.

34:23And we want to be able to live and work in those countries with the lowest possible regulation or bureaucracy. And everything else is for our business is a sideline issue. So I think there's some practicalities here of people actually getting around the table and saying, what are the best things actually for all of the countries to work together and get the best result here? Because we live in times where the European Union and the UK are getting exposed because of actions in the US and around other countries around the globe. So we have to think about taking practical, good solutions that are beneficial for both parties.

35:11And then if you have that, like all things in life, you have a great deal when both sides think it's a great deal. Interesting. 85058, your thoughts, please. The government this morning has unveiled a new framework to tackle PFAS. I was calling them PFAs earlier. Contamination, commonly known as forever chemicals. There are over 10 ,000 different forever chemicals used in everything from essential medical equipment to waterproof clothing. There are growing concerns about their impact on the environment and our health. And part of the plan is to encourage safer alternatives for everyday items that rely on these chemicals.

35:48Tim Fish is product director at Rab, who started phasing out Forever Chemicals more than a decade ago. Tim, morning to you. Good morning. Just explain what you do at Rab. I'm product director. So I look after all of our kind of design development and product range that we make and also look at things like our product roadmap of how to remove PFAS from our product range. Gotcha. So outdoor clothing, that's what Tim works in. I've got Nishma Patel with us as well, policy director at the Chemical Industries Association that represents over 100 chemical companies. Nishma, morning. Good morning, Sean.

36:22How would you describe what a forever chemical is, Nishma? Yeah, I mean, the term forever comes because of the property the chemical provide assurance it's um it's a it's essentially a chemical that is persistent um it's one of the properties that actually give um some of the benefits that come from it but equally it gives rise to concern so the persistency is it's a beneficial property of the chemical it allows it to withstand harsh conditions it gives it stability durability it can resist high temperatures chemicals itself but equally as I said that very own property gives rise to concern because of its persistency it's difficult to break down which means it lingers around in the environment and where in cases for some PFASs it can show to have a healthy impact on environmental impact impact is the reason we have the action plan here today.

37:19So what is this action plan really going to do? Yeah, sure. So the action plan, having a first look at it and a first read of it around it, the approach is essentially looking at different ways in addressing the potential and real harms that PFAS presents. It looks like it's got a three-pronged approach as far as I can see. So it's trying to find out the source, knowing where the PFAS exposure is actually and where it comes from, whether is it coming from manufacturing, is it coming from imported products, is it whilst we're managing waste disposal. So really addressing some of the knowledge gaps we have in this area.

38:01It's also looking at better addressing some of the risks for various actions. So, of course, there's regulatory actions, and it's great that they've got timelines related to each of these actions in terms of when they're going to be delivered. But it's also looking at other areas such as innovation and looking at detection and analytical methods to better detect and test where PFAS pollution may potentially lie. And equally, the third element to this, which really stood out for me in the plan, is around education and public awareness. So not only understanding PFAS and where it can be found and in what products, but also making informed choices about the alternatives.

38:38And so, Tim, I mean, some of this stuff sounds like it would be pretty useful to have in some outdoor clothing where many people just want something as strong and as long lasting as possible to keep them warm, keep them dry. Exactly. Yeah, PFAS have done a really, really good job of what we use them for in the outdoor industry. They allow great performance benefits on things like the waterproof repellency that you get on waterproof jackets and also allow us to laminate different fabrics together and keep air permeability and things like that happening. So, yeah, unfortunately, they do do a really good job.

39:20We have been actively phasing them out, though, as an industry. So why? Why have you been doing that anyway before this plan today? if they provide such a good service for customers in the product that they're buying? Yeah, really good question. Two reasons. The UK government announcement that's coming out today, if I'm honest, feels a little bit behind the curve of other markets. So there's already legislation in the EU and in the USA. At RAV, we sell product globally. So we need to be compliant with legislation in all of our markets. So that's one of the reasons is about meeting legislation ahead of schedule.

40:02Probably more importantly, it's the right thing to do. The industry's known for a number of years that PFAS are harmful. Interestingly, the outdoor industry often gets kind of the spotlight and the focus on it earlier in things like this, probably because PFAS are found in waterways, in the snowpack in the Alps, high up in the Himalayas, all over the environment. And because it's an area that we, as the outdoor industry and at RAB, we love, we don't want to be putting harmful chemicals into the environment. So it's the right thing to do as well as meeting legislation. So it's been kind of a mission of ours to eradicate them from our product range through the last five years.

40:44There's a really clear roadmap of how to take them out of our product. Does it mean that customers need to expect a product might not last as long as it did before and might not quite do the job that these chemicals were doing before? Sure. No, not directly. I think there's consumer education understanding that needs to happen in that things will work as well as they used to with PFAS, but you need to treat them differently. So a classic one is a waterproof jacket with old DWR, again, that water repellency on a jacket. The old versions that contain PFAS have great longevity, perform really well.

41:26When you go to a PFAS compliant DWR or a PFAS free finish, it can work as well, but a consumer will need to do something differently and that's care for it more. So things like washing it more and reproofing it to keep it clean, as opposed to relying on PFAS that will just stay on it forever. So a lot of it's about consumer education and consumer understanding of how they need to do things differently, but the performance and the performance benefit you can get from the product can be the same. People just need to think and use stuff differently. Is that difficult, though, because the second you're having to bring in some consumer education, people having to learn something about the, they just want a coat that'll keep them dry, do you end up with more grumbles, more complaints about your items than perhaps you would have done five to ten years ago?

42:18People are more aware of things working differently. Yeah, we hear more grumbles. A lot of it is a bit of education goes a long, long way. And I think this government legislation will help raise awareness through the whole of society that things work differently. And that's okay. They'll work as well. one of the reasons that you can't just remove PFAS immediately overnight from a product range is it's all over everything so we had to look at each different fabric each different component and work on things bit by bit Nishma, just finally I mean the concerns around this people might think why are they allowed at all?

43:00Shouldn't we just be effectively banning these if we know they can cause so much harm and hang around for so long? Yeah, it's a real challenge. And equally, it presents a real opportunity, I think. So there are, as you say, there are thousands of PFAS substance chemicals that are used across different sectors. We've talked about textiles here, but across sort of automotive aerospace, in health, in medical packaging, you name it, it's got it. And it is because they have so many wide-ranging properties that they provide. It's essentially why they have been such a great product to put on the market.

43:44But now we know more. Now we have more data. We have knowledge. And that is continuously building as we speak. We have our own platform that is bringing the various sectors together. So what we're trying to do, for example, we know cosmetics have largely moved away from PFAS using products. So we're bringing different sectors together to share what they've learned as they've moved away. It's, as was said earlier, it's not an easy overnight sort of solution. Sometimes it can take years to find an alternative. Then it only works well as PFAS, but sometimes you want to ensure that you don't actually create the same or a different issue or challenge in bringing that alternative to the market.

44:23And sometimes it is about education and awareness and the inconvenient truth of accepting that we may not get all the same properties and benefits in some of the products we use today. So lots of work ongoing. Can I say we've moved to alternatives for all the various PFASs out there? No, we haven't. But there is several amounts of different platforms and knowledge gaps being filled to deliver that. Nishma, thank you for your time this morning. Nishma Patel, Policy Director at the Chemical Industries Association. Tim Fish. Tim, good to talk to you. Product Director at Rab, the outdoor clothing business as well.

44:5885058, your thoughts? Let's hear plenty more on Five Live throughout the day about police reviewing misconduct claims after Lord Mandelson was accused of passing on sensitive government information to the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Lord Mandelson's not responded to requests for comment about the allegations. Here's Dan Needle, who spoke to The World at One yesterday. He's founder of the think tank Tax Policy Associates, member of the Labour Party as well. He was looking through the files and came across the leaked government emails. There's an email where Peter Mandelson and Epstein are discussing the bailout of the euro, the 500 million bailout of the euro.

45:36And Epstein's heard rumours that it's happening. And Mandelson confirms it and says it will be announced tonight. And it was announced tonight. So that was absolutely market sensitive information. There's two emails, one from June in 2009, which was clearly forwarded by Lord Mandelson to Jeffrey Epstein, surrounding ways that the government could dispose of saleable assets that didn't need to be in the public sector. So that's potentially a multi-billion pound asset sale of great interest to the financial markets. And Lord Mandelson forwarded it straight to Jeffrey Epstein and then answered a question about what kind of assets it might concern.

46:13There's then another email in August, which I think is more market sensitive. It concerns the non-bank lending market, securitization, and ways of making the financial markets free up more lending to small and medium business. And that would have been a great interest to people like JP Morgan, reactive in those debt markets. So that's Dan Needle there, who's founder of the Think Tank Tax Policy Associates. 85058, if you want to get in touch, Dieter's been in touch about outdoor jackets this morning, Sean. We've noticed some clothing start shredding after a time when they've used recycled materials in making the jackets.

46:53Do let me know if you've noticed any major changes in the outdoor clothing that you've been buying, particularly are there other items of clothing as well, as we hear about those chemicals already being phased out by some businesses, but there's been more efforts now by the government to try and push others to phase these forever chemicals out over a longer period of time. Right, let's take you to Rome and the world-famous Trevi Mantin. Three coins in the fountain, each one seeking happiness. Frank Sinatra at least knows it's a fountain and not a mountain. Three coins in the fountain, Rome's Trevi Fountain, one of Rome's star attractions.

47:38From this week, tourists must pay two euros to access the fountain's viewing area. It's attempting to manage the number of tourists. Ten million visitors it got last year. Back in August, Glenn Fogel, Booking.com's chief executive, joined us on the Big Boss Interview podcast, you may well remember, subscribe on BBC Sounds, where he said there were various ways that popular destinations could fight over tourism. One way to do it is you can make it more expensive. So that would be Botswana. Botswana, a wonderful place to visit, extremely expensive. Then they did it on purpose, the government, because they didn't want to have what was in East Africa, say Kenya and some of the other, Tanzania, where there are masses of people going along on safari.

48:21Some places, if you look at mountaineers who want to go up Everest, well, lottery system there too. So there are lots of different methods when you have too much demand and not a supply. Michael O 'Regan is lecturer in tourism and events at Glasgow Caledonian University. Michael, morning. Good morning, Sean. How are you? I'm well, thank you. Have you visited this particular fountain? I have. We stayed with some friends there one or two years ago, but they also made sure that we visited other palaces and other, you know, fountains across, you know, Rome. So I think, yeah, you know, Rome has the problem.

48:56It's a hit and miss destination. Everyone goes to the big five, you know, Trevi, the Colosseum, the Vatican. But Rome aren't great at tourism management at times, and maybe this is the case. Other fountains are available. That's what part of the slogan needs to be, it seems, to get people not just to pay these two euros. So will that work? Your experience there in Rome, if it was a two euro fee to access that fountain, would that have made any difference to your itinerary? No, it's less than a coffee. It's not going to stop the number of tourists going to Rome because of its Jubilee year 25. They did get more tourists than normal, 22 million.

49:39But it's not going to stop people going, and you can still view the fountain from the higher steps above the fountain. So it's not going to reduce excessive tourism to Rome as a whole, and it's not going to stop the number of tourists passing through the area. What will it do then? It will raise money. It will, you know, they haven't given a good estimate, but it will be between six and 20 million. And that's not going, and that doesn't include the amount of coins thrown into the fountain. So it's a good revenue earner. So, I mean, they say that this is attempting to manage the number of tourists.

50:18Will it make any difference, perhaps not to the numbers, but how they go about getting those tourists to the fountain up close. Yes, yeah, you have to pay if you want to get up close to the water and you want to take that selfie or take that picture, you know, or just to say that you were there. So can that be a barrier in itself? Just not so much the level of the cost, but just the fact that you have to go through the process. You know, you're on holiday. You want to just get enough tickets, keep all of that minimal as possible. that actually that might just make people go to those higher viewing platforms and not get up close as much as so many would want to?

51:00We have to wait and see. If you go before half 11 Monday to Friday, it's going to be free. After 10pm, it's going to be free. So it may lead people to get up a little bit earlier and to have breakfast and go and see the fountain. Do you see those nudges, if we can call it that, in tourism? Are we any good at them here in the UK to get people to go where we want at the times we want? No, we're not great. And there are issues about overcrowding. But what do we do? Do we charge people to stop and view it? You know, the Big Ben, do we charge people from abroad to use our national museums? So we're not great at nudging, but they're often sticks rather than carrots.

51:43And they're often, you know, targeting the easily targetable, the tourist. They actually don't vote in those destinations. So it's an easy tax revenue source as well. Michael, good to talk to you. Michael O 'Regan, Glasgow Caledonia University. Big thanks to David and Emma as well. And everybody's been in touch, been a big one for conversation this morning. That's it for Wake Up To Money. Wake Up To Money from BBC Five Live. That's it from Wake Up To Money. You can download the podcast every Monday to Friday. So please make sure you subscribe. We'd also love it if you left us a review when you do.

52:19Get in touch, keep the conversation going anytime as well on social media. Use the hashtag WakeUpToMoney.

52:49And the Eagles have beaten the Chiefs convincingly in Super Bowl 59. Five lives for NFL. Listen on BBC Sounds.

From the publisher

Sean Farrington reacts to Elon Musk's merger of Space-X and xAI - making it the most valuable private company ever.

And, as the government tackles forever chemicals linked to harm to the environment and human health - Sean Farrington speaks to an outdoor clothing brand that's already developing alternatives.

And we discuss the future of Disney as its veteran CEO prepares to leave the entertainment giant.

Three coins in the fountain? Why you may need four or five coins in your pocket the next time you visit Rome's world-famous landmark.

More from Wake Up to Money

All 187 episodes
Musk's "innovation engine"Wake Up to Money · 53 min
Listen in VO