In short
Podcast Notes: Capital Allocators - Episode 87: Rahul Moodgal - Master Fund Raiser
Episode Overview In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides speaks with Rahul Moodgal, a seasoned fund raiser with over 20 years of experience across various investment strategies. Rahul has raised approximately $60 billion since 2005 and has played prominent roles at firms like TT International and The Children’s Investment Fund (TCI). The conversation revolves around capital raising insights, lessons learned, the importance of transparency, and contrasts between fundraising for charities and investment firms.
Key Highlights
- Background of Rahul Moodgal
- Grew up in London and studied international relations, economics, and political economy.
- Transitioned from academia to finance due to a desire for a dynamic environment.
- His career started at TT International, and he later joined TCI, where he successfully led significant fundraising efforts.
Discussion Topics
- Capital Raising Insights
- Importance of Transparency:
- Building trust through honesty about management and organizational challenges.
- Communicating effectively during difficult times fosters stronger relationships.
- Lessons from Teaching:
- Patience and listening are essential skills learned from teaching international political economy.
- Understanding the needs and motivations of clients is crucial in fundraising.
- Fundraising Dynamics Pre and Post-2008
- Pre-2008 Gold Rush:
- Rapid fundraising with high demand for investment opportunities.
- The market environment changed drastically post-crisis, leading to longer due diligence periods.
- Modern Fee Structures:
- Shift from traditional fee models (2 and 20) to more flexible structures that align interests between managers and investors.
- Effective Marketing Strategies
- Three key points to successful fundraising include:
- Understanding the unique value proposition of the fund.
- Discussing past mistakes and lessons learned to build credibility.
- Developing a comprehensive business plan that outlines the vision for the firm.
- Challenges for Startups
- Startup Fund Issues:
- Common pitfalls include overcomplicating processes and being too risk-averse.
- Importance of having realistic business plans and not overextending resources early on.
- Comparing Nonprofit and Investment Fundraising
- Ethics and Compassion:
- Nonprofits require a more personal and compassionate approach, focusing on relatable stories that resonate with potential donors.
- Fundraising in charities often necessitates a rigorous ethical governance structure.
- Long-Term Relationships:
- Both sectors emphasize building lasting relationships, but the depth of connection can differ based on the emotional investment in charitable causes.
Key Takeaways
- Relationships Over Transactions: The foundation of successful fundraising lies in the quality of relationships developed over time.
- Long-Term Mindset: A rational, long-term perspective is crucial for navigating the ups and downs of fundraising, whether for investments or charities.
- Continuous Learning: Rahul emphasizes the importance of adapting and learning from both successes and failures in the fundraising journey.
Conclusion Rahul Moodgal's extensive experience and insights provide valuable lessons for both seasoned professionals and newcomers in the fields of finance and nonprofit fundraising. His focus on transparency, relationship-building, and long-term thinking are essential strategies for success.
Additional Resources
- For more information and to listen to the episode, visit [Capital Allocators Podcast](http://capitalallocatorspodcast.com).
---
These notes encapsulate the key concepts and discussions from the episode, providing an accessible format for readers interested in the insights shared by Rahul Moodgal in the realm of capital raising and institutional investing.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:04Hello, I'm Ted Seides, and this is Capital Allocators. This show is an open exploration of the people and process behind capital allocation. Through conversations with leaders in the money game, we learn how these holders of the keys to the kingdom allocate their time and their capital. You can keep up to date by visiting CapitalAllocatorsPodcast .com. My guest on today's show is master fundraiser Rahul Mudgal. Rahul spent 20 years as a fundraiser across long -only strategies, hedge funds, fund -to -funds, customized solutions, startups, and nonprofits. Collectively, he's raised and helped raise $60 billion for firms since 2005.
0:53Rahul started his career in the industry at Powerhouse TT International and later joined the Children's Investment Fund, or TCI, where he led the marketing effort that raised $20 billion in just three and a half years. Within TCI's affiliate model, Raul also was responsible for the largest India fundraise in history and the largest sector fund launch in history. Our conversation covers capital -raising lessons learned from teaching, the value of transparency, the gold rush before 2008, the lean times afterwards, modern fee structures, the three key points to effective marketing, the three traits that will kill you, the two biggest issues startup funds face, the best questions asked by leading allocators, and some of the worst horror stories in attempted capital raising.
1:43We close by comparing fundraising for charities and investment firms. Mohul has a wealth of knowledge in how to raise capital, and he's chock full of wisdom in describing his experiences. Before we get going, at our homepage, capitalallocatorspodcast .com, you can now sign up to receive three different sources of information. With a premium subscription, you can get access to the library of transcripts, or with a premium corporate subscription, tack on an invitation to attend our dinner series with podcast guests. Next, for free, I'll send you an email once a month with just a few great things I read and listened to over the month.
2:24And lastly, you can sign up to receive an email once a week from our blog, including curated news from the Endowment Foundation community and our written content. Everyone seems to like great material at the low, low price of free. So time permitting, we'll keep delivering on that growing demand. Stay tuned to this little block each week for announcements of new enhancements. Please enjoy my conversation with Raul Mudgal. Raul, it's so wonderful to see you. And great to see you, Ted. Well, I love starting with people's backgrounds, so why don't you just dive right in? So, grew up in London, went to university in the UK, Russia, Japan, and the States.
3:07Hold on a second. Yeah. Russia, Japan, and the States. Yeah. What brought you to all three? So I did a PhD on how regions with resources use those resources to gain political and economic leverage over central governments. My case study was the Russian Far East, which sits between Siberia and the Pacific Ocean. So Russia and Japan, obviously, and then the top guys in the world are in the US. I did a stint at Harvard, University of Illinois, Urban and Champaign, University of Washington, Seattle, and University of Hawaii. Not so bad. So what degrees did you end up with after this whole path? I have an undergrad in international relations, a master's in economics and politics of development, and a PhD in political economy from LSE.
3:51So you finish all the schooling, and then you do what? Well, in the interim, I get pulled onto a British government project, which is connected to what I'm researching. And also, my old university invites me back to go and teach there. So I spend four years commuting between three cities, living in the one in the middle, which is Birmingham, studying in London, and then teaching at Kiel, which is sort of in the Midlands, sort of near Manchester. So for four years, I was just commuting between all four. And what were you teaching? International political economy to undergrads, which was great. You realize how smart you're not when they ask you really good questions.
4:29And I learned as much from them as I hope I helped them learn. So what did you learn from teaching? I learned to be patient. I learned that there's people who are smarter than you. And I learned to listen. I think those are the three things. And I think actually those are the things I took with me in my post -academic career. So what led you out of academia? The British government project was coming to an end. I wanted to be back in London. And academia is a great world, but it's full of a lot of stifling hurdles. a lot of slow processes to get anything done and i just kind of i hope i'm more dynamic than that and i wanted to just come back to london and feel that energy so i applied to loads and loads of jobs and they were finance they were diplomacy they were lots of different things nothing was kind of concrete of what i was going to do and then this job came out with a small boutique asset manager said well your background in teaching is kind of what we're looking for for someone who can look after our clients.
5:31We haven't got anyone who looks after our clients. I said, okay, fine. Can you write our newsletter for us? Can you sort of make sure they looked after? So those skills from teaching really came across the writing part, the patience part, making sure people understand what you're doing. So explaining things. So there's a lot of synergies there. So yeah, that started in 1998. What was that first asset manager? That firm was TT International. And at At that time, they were the number one international IFA manager in the world. So we had biggest endowments and foundations, the best corporations in the US.
6:03So straight away, I was thrown in to meet all these guys day one. I was like, wow, I'm speaking to all these amazing people who I've heard of. But all of a sudden, I'm looking after them. How did you tackle this new role? I am just sitting there surrounded by all these really smart people who know what an equity is, who know what a benchmark is, who know what alpha is and beta is, I have no clue. So I just sat there and literally like a sponge, I sat and absorbed it all and listened to what they were saying and then started reading, reading, reading Warren Buffett way, common stocks, uncommon profits, all that sort of stuff.
6:41So just read, read, read, read, read and then started reading everything that was going on in the market because 1998, 1999 was a fascinating time with LTCM going on, the crisis coming for Russia, then the tech bubble and all this stuff was happening as we were sort of sitting there. And then the Berlin Wall collapses. So the world is like this crazy place. But at the same time, I have to understand in terms of the investment process of this firm that politics was connected to economics. So really how it made them choose which stocks to put in a portfolio and all that sort of stuff. So literally, I just sat there like a sponge absorbing everything.
7:16And a lot of it was regurgitating, even before I understood what I was talking about. So how long did that learning process internally at TT happen before you felt ready to go start talking to the clients? Literally three months. I started October 5th, 1998. And by the end of December, I was on my own. Just let me go through it. So it was hard, but it was amazing. And I think that's how you learn. When you're thrown in, you just have to get on and do it. So it was a whole new world. I was fascinated. I was learning so much about the world, the markets, and all these concepts, which I had no idea about.
7:51It's a completely different world to what I was used to. And what did you find when you went out? A lot of times there's a segregation in this business between the investment principles that the clients want to interact with, and then the business development team where the manager says, no, no, no, you just go raise me money without a plan or an agenda. I was at TT for seven years. I never was left on my own to go and raise money. I did everything apart from the final pitch. So the PMs did the final pitch, but I did all the client take on, all the interaction with them in terms of what they wanted, sat to them, spoke to them, got to know them, took them out for drinks, all the rest of it.
8:29But I wasn't let loose until 2005, which we'll talk about, which someone gave me a chance. And so it's a huge, huge disparity between their thinking and my thinking because I'm much more of a relationship person. So it's kind of like, well, I have to look after these people. So I want to know who they are, how they think, what do they want. Whereas the other guys are like, well, how do we get this money in that we manage? So it's very, very different. I would say almost they're the investment guys, but they were the marketing guys. And I worked in the marketing team, but I was much more a relationship guy.
9:00So it's a very different approach. And how did you balance that when the investment guys are running the shop? They're your boss. They're putting pressure on you to raise money. they let me over time take care of things because the clients gave good feedback and i was just patient and did things slowly and properly i think they were always in a rush and that's something that i learned over time that actually do things slowly don't be in a rush because when you're in a rush you can say the wrong things things can come out the wrong way you can put pressure on people where you shouldn't be putting pressure on people so it's almost about balancing what they were doing versus what i was doing so they would go out they'll say right these guys are coming back they're coming in they want this they want that So fine, we'll get that done, but let's talk to them while we're doing it.
9:43So that kind of slows the process rather than just being so reactive that people feel like, okay, we want to do this, but they're coming back too quickly. We need some space to think about it because when people are thinking about investing, they need to think about what they're doing, how it correlates to the rest of the portfolio. Is this really what we think it is? And really look at the quality of the returns. And it's a much bigger thing than that. Do we like these people? Can we work with them? Are they going to be transparent? Are they going to let us come to their offices? Are they going to come and see us?
10:10So it's a bigger thing than just numbers, right? So when you start breaking down that process, take one client in mind. We'll talk about prospects separately, but how do you figure out what the right cadence of communication is with one particular client? Honestly, it's the age -old question. You put 10 economists on an island, ask them a question, you get 11 different answers. And that's really what it is because everyone has their own personal needs and requirements as well as institutional pressures. so there's really no right or wrong answer but I think you reach a standard of what should be done and I think over these 20 years I've learned over time that transparency is key it really is it's good for your relationship but also when you have tough times people understand what's going on because you're transparent they can say well I understand why this stock's not working or why this concentration's working or not working and being straight up about it is great but I think the key to it all.
11:05And the person who taught me this really is Seth Alexander, who said, you have to understand my responsibility as a fiduciary. And he's the one who really taught me that out of everyone that I've worked with over the years. And what did that mean in that context? It means it's not just a relationship about you investing in this fund or with this manager. It's understanding that what happens with that manager and that relationship has an impact on his responsibility for an endowment so it can be not just that investment but how it correlates to other investments what's the liquidity profile of that into what he can pay out to other people the access he has to the manager and the underlying holdings all that sort of stuff so it was a lot of things there which i didn't really understand until he really explained it to me and i was like do you know what i really get it now so it made me sit in his mind and say how can i help him do his job and before that it wasn't about that it was like right what do I need to do to do my job but it's not about that it's about actually understanding what are the things that investors need to help them do their job and if you understand that then you can do your job better and you become more proactive so over the years when I do a report I now include much more than I would have ever included because I know these guys are going to ask me for this and this and this and this and you just keep adding it.
12:26So it reduces their need to keep coming back to you. Can I have this? Can I have this? You just standardize it and everyone gets that information and they pick out what they want and you just learn. You learn over time. So the implication then is that there may be a range of things that different people want, but there is a certain body of information that everybody wants or wants some of. Correct. Simple things. You'll laugh. people don't want to tell you what AUM they have under management. Why? The smart investors triangulate that AUM. So they say, right, you tell us your AUM, we'll speak to your administrator, we'll speak to prime brokers.
13:00And I've seen it time and time again where investors have come to me and said, the guy said he's managing X, but he's managing X minus this. It's a lot smaller. So people just lie. What have they got in their portfolio? So I know one investor said, we had this manager, amazing returns, and we asked him if they used options. They said they never used options. But actually over time, it became apparent they were using options. They just lied about it. So people want to know kind of how much you have in swaps, how much you have in physical, attribution, country, sector stuff, all that sort of exposure.
13:31It's simple stuff, but I don't understand why people are so cagey about sending it out. And what happens with the softer issues and transparency? So through the life of any manager you're working with, there are good times and bad times. There's internal friction that resolves itself. When you're in a moment where, boy, there's some information that's not great, might be it's temporary, might be permanent. How much do you share with a client if you're trying to be transparent? So I've learned post -crisis, just deal with it. Lay on the table, tell someone what's wrong, and they'll be much more respectful of you as an organization and as a group of people if you're up front with them.
14:14So if something goes wrong on the investment side, just tell them. Explain what's happened, why it's happened, and what you're going to learn from it. If someone's leaving, just tell them, because a rumor mill is faster than you can ever be. And the key thing is to take control of the situation. And if you take control of it at the beginning, then you're going to be able to deal with it. And you'll take whatever bad news comes your way. But if you leave it and it starts to fester, having been in that situation a couple of times, everyone's calling you going, I've heard this, I've heard that. And you've lost control.
14:43And there's no way you can ever get control. You lose respect. You lose the message that you're trying to portray. And everyone interprets it differently. And they're all speaking to each other before you've got to everyone. So it's so important. And then what happens when you're in an organization where the portfolio managers don't see eye to eye with that concept? Well, unfortunately, I'm not very good at dealing with that. And what's the age -old definition of integrity is doing the right thing when no one else is looking. And to the end, I will always do the right thing. And I've been in situations where I've had to do it because it's the right thing to do.
15:18And I've been blasted by the PM. But I've said to them, look, I'm sitting around the table looking at people I've known for 10, 15, 20 years. I'm not going to lie. I'm just going to tell them the truth. And they may not like it. You may not like it. But what I care about is not if that person's invested in us, but in 20 years time, if they'll pick up the phone to me when I call them. And that's what it's about. And everyone forgets that. Everyone's so focused on execution. This business is about duration, right? And it's not about, oh, I've got money from them now. I'll move on. It's not about that.
15:48It's about, can you call them? Can you talk to them about other managers? Can you talk to them about opportunities? And those things, if you do the wrong thing, you're just never going to get that. Yeah. So if I play devil's advocate with you a little bit, someone could look at that conflict and say, well, Raul, you're just serving yourself for the long term. You're not serving our organization because, yes, you have this opinion that this thing that happened and you should tell people. But that doesn't reflect well on us. And we think it's going to be resolved in a month anyway, so why bother sharing it?
16:16And that's fair. But the fact is relationships transcend organizations, okay? So if you have a relationship with an investor, today I worked with investors since 1998. I've worked through six, seven, eight, nine different firms. But the fact is they always know what's going on. And any manager I work with knows that I'm always going to be honest. And if they can't handle it, then I'm not going to work with them. So that's something straight up at the beginning I will say to people is like, I'll tell people this is great and it's a good idea for you to look at but also if you do something wrong I'm always going to tell people and they're a bit shocked but I'm like that's why if I pick up the phone to these people they listen and they trust me to me that's what matters more than anything because managers come and go but those endowments foundations families they're around forever so it's a different mindset so people don't think about that and I think too many people sit there saying, I'm going to do X, Y, and Z.
17:06And all of a sudden, they realize actually when that manager closes down or they leave, whatever, they're sitting in this world where all these people, they've burnt all these relationships. They can't call those people again. Life, it's all relationships, all of this thing. It's not about money. It's about relationships. And everyone forgets that. So let's go back to your career at TT. So you start, you're now working with the clients. And what happens over the couple of years while you're there? So our joint TT is under $2 billion of AUM. And the space of 18 months, it goes to $8 .5 billion.
17:39In 18 months? In 18 months. We're just winning business from everyone. The performance is insane. We have closed in the interim at $3 billion. But as soon as we were open, the queue's waiting. And it's just insane. Anyone we want, we're getting money from them. And then this firm decides to become everything to everyone. And we launch an Asia fund, an event -driven fund. Everything you can think of, we do that. But as you do that, the organization grows, it becomes more institutionalized, become more processes, more bureaucracy, and a glass ceiling comes over. And I'm like, okay, I can stay here forever and enjoy it.
18:11And it's great. But I'm not going to learn. And I want to learn. And I take a sidestep and go and join a private Swiss bank. It's the worst decision of my career. What year is that? 2004. I resign after six months. So what happened? It's everything that I hated. It's nepotistic. It's bureaucratic. It's not focused on the client. It's focused on the organization. It's just not what I'm about. And the role wasn't what I was told it was either. Neither was a comp. So I was just like, I'm done. And in the meantime, I get a call from a headhunter who'd called me actually a year before I'd taken this job and said, there's a role out there.
18:50These guys want to meet you. And I'm like, well, who is it? And he, to this day, he's a dear friend. To this day, I still respect him for it. He wouldn't tell me who it was for. I said, okay. And then he said, well, I'll send you a job description. I look at it and I say, it's my dream job. What did the description say? It basically said you will lead the business development and investor relations for a prominent hedge fund that's going to build out a platform. You want someone who's going to take charge on looking after clients, building out the business, developing the strategy, the branding, look after the client reporting.
19:22And your responsibilities include attending conferences, looking after the investors, building an investor day, all that sort of stuff. And I was like, this is great because these guys are clearly at the cusp of sort of becoming huge. And they wanted someone who could sort of grow with them. So I went for an interview. I met the COO and we laughed for an hour. And then the principal came in and we sat there for two hours. And at the end, he said, give me 20 references. I can call. And I played hardball and said, you give me someone. I'll tell you if I know them. We came up with 20. And then he called me the next day and said, I really want you to come in and speak to us some more.
19:56And yeah. So since 2005, basically been now at the helm of raising the money and looking after clients rather than just looking after clients. And that portfolio manager was? Chris Hon. Chris Hon from TCI. TCI, yeah. So now you're getting ready to launch TCI and you're tasked with raising money. What was that like, changing from just trying to serve the clients to bringing dollars in the door? It was literally the best feeling ever, but also the most scary. so imagine in front of you you've got a mountain and you're really excited that you can see the top of it and you can go to it but the thought of you actually climbing and the actual physical work involved in carrying your backpack and the oxygen and the rest of it it's invigorating but it's also excruciating at the same time so chris had launched we had another manager platform and they were just about to launch another one and then go from there so i literally my first day we go to an investment committee meeting for one of the biggest endowments that was invested with us and chris said right we're going to this meeting come in and this endowment i knew them from tt and i went in the cac and said oh great we're going to work in with you again and just sat there chris went through the story talked about the returns did everything and at the end pushed the presentation book to me and said it's all yours now i literally broke a swear because at that time that platform had about six billion dollars on know and i didn't know what was going to happen after that what happened after that was like nothing i've ever experienced in my life i felt like i was king of the world because everyone in the world was calling us we just couldn't even process the amount of inquiries we were getting and we built five years on we built a platform of 30 billion dollars with five managers on and it was incredible i traveled all over the world we had 1200 investors at our peak all the good, the bad, the famous, the infamous endowments, foundations, corporations, family offices.
21:59It was incredible. It was a dream. It really was a dream. So let's walk through some of the challenges. On the one hand, Chris and TCI is just extraordinary track record of investing, which maybe it makes it easier. On the other, there are people who have said, well, Well, he's not such a warm, fuzzy type of person. What value add do you play when the portfolio manager is perceived as just a savant who prints money for clients and everybody wants their way in the door? There is actually a process there of getting people on board. So there's a lot of admin to do. First and foremost, you have to go back and understand who your investors are, how they think.
22:43Everything was there, but it'd grown so quickly. For example, there was no link between the underlying registered shareholders and the clients. So you had client A, but they had XYZ holding Inc. So I had to spend a lot of time matching all those out to know who had how much money with us. In some cases, it was obvious. That's the first thing. Second thing is actually processing and facilitating the meetings with Chris and the clients was a big thing, as well as all the other managers on the platform. Third thing is investors need to go through due diligence process. Even though in those days we were less willing to help as we are today about giving investors what they needed.
23:18But people also spent a lot of time trying to understand what was behind these numbers, how are these numbers being generated. I think the big question actually, the thing we had the biggest pushback on is Chris had a foundation. And a lot of people said, hey, I'm a foundation, I'm endowment. I don't really want to give money to a manager who's funding another foundation or endowment. or Chris is activist and all these names and it's headline risk for us help me understand how I get around that so there were a lot of things to sort of think about there it wasn't as easy it was a lot of work and I can tell you it was a lot of work because I worked all the time so it wasn't just Chris me picking up phone going hey you're giving us money and that was it I wish it was but it wasn't like that it was certainly easier than it is today but also had to manage Chris take him to meet clients and there were times where we had to travel together do things then we used to have this huge investor day in New York every year where 500 people come that took months of planning months and months and months you had to coordinate all these meetings and stuff so it was a lot of stuff and a lot of queries back and forth back and forth it was streamlining the reporting setting up a CRM system then we as a business grew became part of a management committee which managed day to day issues at the organization we had five different managers on the platform so at any one time.
24:35One of them was closed. Another one wasn't. One was having a good time. One wasn't. So it was just always things to do. It just never, never stopped. Let's start with TCI. And then we can talk about some of the affiliates. Clients wanted to invest. And you've talked a lot about the importance of understanding your clients, understanding their needs. But to do that, as someone in the business development role, you need their time. and so how much of your ability to do that was predicated on being around funds tt and then tci that people wanted to invest in it's huge so being with firms that people want to invest in obviously it's a great thing and it becomes about being a traffic cop and managing that traffic right directing it the right way telling it when to come in and when not to come in which road to take on the rest of it there's other times where you have to go out and raise and sometimes you won't believe me but there's situations that come up and you're like wow this is really throwing me in I'll give you a great example I'm going to Asia Chris calls me I land in Hong Kong calls me on a Thursday night and says I need 800 million by Monday okay fine so I go to sleep I wake up Friday morning I sit on the phone and raise 800 million bucks call him and suddenly 800 million is coming on Monday because he's gonna make a big investment in visa so there's situations like that that come up and you're like wow this is not just about dealing with the traffic it's actually going out and saying right actually we need to really really lay down here who's going to give us money how we're going to structure that money is it going to be three year or five year and who do you want to take it from because you're always conscious then of how much money people already have with you do you grow that or do you take new investors in this there's lots of things to think about so had a few occasions where to do that and it was great because in those days you could do that i think today you can do it but you have to be the right manager who thinks about things at the right time is capital disciplined and thoughtful.
26:27Yeah, it's definitely different. So let's move it from, okay, the star manager that everybody wants to get in. Yes, there's a lot of work. But at that point in time, you actually had the interest and the ability to call people and raise $800 million over a weekend. How about the affiliates? So now you have new funds, there's some implicit endorsement of Chris and TCI. What were the experience like? And you can either take them one by one, Why don't we start with the one that was the least appetizing on the surface to investors? There were four affiliates. One of them still exists, Parvis, who I work with today, who are great.
27:04There was an India fund, TCI New Horizon. There was a financial fund, Algebras, which is huge today. And then there was an ex -Fidelity guy called KDA Capital. So KDA was probably the hardest one to do. But I think part of that is because we'd just done an India fund, and three months later, we were doing another fund. So I think the volume of kind of reach out was a lot. And Parvis wasn't that old already, and it was already European based. So that was probably the toughest one. It probably took us 18 months to get to a billion, which people probably today think, well, that's not bad at all. But in those days, it was a long time versus an Algebra, which launched day one with 1 .1 billion of demand.
27:43It's the largest sector fund launch in history. And we start with 675 day one, then took it over time. So it was just a crazy time. And these launches were all what years? So TCI launched January 2004. Parvis launched October 2004. TCI New Horizons October 2005. KDA launched December 2005. And Algebus October 2006. So it was all pre -crisis. All pre -crisis. All pre -crisis. Absolutely, absolutely. So we didn't know any other world. I had people who would call me up and say, we've already approved an investment in you, and they hadn't even met us. I'm like, that's crazy. But you would have investment vehicles structured in such a way through swaps, through banknotes, through derivatives, all sorts of crazy things that people were doing to just get money into a manager.
28:30You know, there were a couple of family offices I dealt with who I found out subsequently after the crisis that they had portfolios that were levered four or six times. So if you're down 50%, you go to zero, you lose everything. So one family I worked with, you know, they had $6 billion. They went to $1 billion in wealth. It's still a lot of money, but people were doing crazy things, absolutely crazy things. So I think reality setting, it was horrible and it was tough, but you learned about who you were and what you believed in and what your morals and your ethics were and really fundamentally going forward, how you were going to do this job.
29:03The principles that you thought you knew and that guided you prior to that were not really the ones that were going to guide you afterwards. Everything changed. And as horrible as it was, I still got bullet holes in me from then. And it was the best experience because it really humbles you. It makes you realize you don't walk on water. No one walks on water. Nothing's sustainable. Nothing's forever. But you don't learn from success. You learn from failure, right? And this is the thing that taught me everything that I do today and really what's important and how to do this stuff. And I think I've really, really found who I am and how this should be done, really.
Read the full transcript
29:40And I don't care how everyone else does it. I do it my way. and people still haven't learned from those times. It's incredible to me. But more than that, I will also say most investors I deal with are world class and they're phenomenal. But there's also a handful of people who still haven't learned from the allocator side who are still doing crazy things like asset liability mismatch, investing in managers they shouldn't be investing in, not understanding the structure of the returns that those managers are giving them, where the returns are coming from. Is it coming from stock picking? Is it coming from leverage?
30:09Is it coming from concentration in one specific name? People don't look at that. they don't look at the correlation between the manager and their portfolio. And all of a sudden, they wake up and they're like, oh, wow, I've got 10 managers that have all got the same stocks. No wonder I'm down. So it made me realize also what I needed to do, but also what investors should be thinking about. And that, again, goes back to the point I made about Seth, is sort of really trying to sit in those people's shoes and understanding what they're doing and what they're thinking. So now I spend a lot of time with investors when I meet them, understanding who they are, how they invest, what makes them think, what makes them worried, how they're thinking about the world.
30:43Because then you can sort of get into their mindsets. Are these the right people for us to work with or not? Do they really get what we're doing? Are they long term? Are they patient? And the key for me is actually when you have a tough time, are those people going to give you more money or not? And if they're not, then they're some of the right people. So let's roll forward through the financial crisis. What happens with your career? I have a tough time. And then I sort of think March, April time, 2009, what am I going to do longer term? I thought well this has been great but I want to kind of do this choosing who I want to work with ultimately I worked for Chris and Chris chose who was on that platform and so I sort of started thinking about it but the first thing I needed to do was to step away from that and think what's the future so I stepped away and I was lucky enough at that time for Parvis guys to come to and said we still want to work with you so it was continuity for me it was great and they were open to me working for other people as well as long as there was no conflict so that's really what i've done today and i know i've actually worked with parva since 2005 first with chris and then separately from chris since 2009 it's been great and so the post -crisis environment for raising capital different completely different completely different if you put it in a time spectrum i would say what used to take six weeks now takes 18 months the intensity the level of information the due diligence i've had to learn about the managers that i worked with before to a level that i never had to because i'm getting asked questions i've never been asked and even today 15 years on people the amount of work they're doing the quality of the work they're doing is incredible i love that because that's they're investing in a relationship okay The longer that someone takes, the longer they're going to be with you.
32:34There's one firm that I went to meet in 2009. They didn't invest until 2013. They took five years. But they invested heavily and strategically and they're long -term. But that's great. Because in the old days, it was pick up the phone. The money would come, boom. Then something goes wrong, the money's gone. So I fundamentally believe in long -term. And now duration is even more important to me than anything. What types of firms have you worked with in addition to Parvus post -crisis? So I worked with a long -only manager in Asia. She's been investing in Asia longer than anyone, 25 years. We built a great business and she retired earlier this year.
33:10We gave all the money back to investors. It was great. And it was nice doing it in a different way, doing it in a different regulatory authority. We're based in Singapore. We did only managed accounts. So it's great. And actually being there, beginning designing it all and doing everything was fantastic. Hadn't done that for a while. That was great. and then I've helped a number of guys pro bono on the requests of investors, prime brokers, all those people reach out to me. And there's a huge amount of talent out there, huge, huge, huge. I feel quite excited actually because for the first time in a very long time, there's a lot of good guys coming out.
33:42There's a lot of younger guys who've worked their way up an organization or been the number two for a long time and people feel they're ready now to sort of go out there. So there's so much to do. But there's also a lot of the bad habits coming back. I can see that people are worried about short term. The market is so myopic. So people have FOMO big time. So if you go back to 1999, 2000, if you didn't own the tech stocks, you weren't going to perform. And it's the same thing today, where people fear, if I don't own certain stocks or certain sectors, even certain geographies, you go back three years, people worried about investing in the US.
34:19They want to diversify. But today, the US market continues to do well. And everyone's like, well, I need to stop doing active international and do passive US because it's going to do better. But they're being short term about it. You have to think longer term. And if you put your eggs in one basket, that basket's going to break. So it's really interesting. So all those bad habits are coming back big time. And I sometimes feel that people are becoming more momentum, more short term, and just missing out on the bigger picture. So you've had such a wide spectrum of different types of investors and a number.
34:52what are you hearing when say there's some younger up and coming talent you want to invest with and depending on the box it might be a higher fee box and there's this big question of the value of active management and the price of active management what are you hearing i've had less discussions about fees than other people have because i think let's take a step back i think in the old days everyone talks about strategy okay and i think people focused on the wrong thing it was never about strategy certain today it's not about sure it's about structure and we talk about fees people don't mind paying fees as long as they're structured the right way okay so the old two and twenty charging every year forget it that game's over but if you charge two and twenty but you pay those incentives over three years or over a hurdle or over a benchmark well that's fine and if you deliver the returns that's great now there's people who are coming out with all sorts of different ideas management fees going down as assets grow which is great and i think that's good but the key thing we've got to remember is that if you pay peanuts you get monkeys and i think it's really important that people are incentivized to work hard to deliver good performance to do good work for you and if the money's not there they're not going to do that they're going to find shortcuts and i think people end up resenting actually working the way they're working so i think we've got to be really careful there in terms of making sure that the right people get paid and i'm sure people deliver performance they'll get paid you make your money from incentive fees anyway not from management fees management fees are just they don't mean anything but i think people are really good at being thoughtful about where those management firm doesn't need 200 million dollars of management fees what are they doing with that money okay so it's absolutely correct to make sure that people don't continue to charge the fees in that way but incentive fees are charged differently now.
36:40So in the old days, a long biased manager would charge from zero. But today they are the charge over a long term time horizon or over a hurdle or over a benchmark. And it's the right way to do it. Because ultimately, we're here to make money. But the interesting thing I think is now you're seeing this huge, huge conflicts of the merging of long short, long only private equity. And the number of the people I speak today, equity is equity. They just have a bucket for it. Because in the old days, the differentiation between them was duration and fees and structure. And today they're saying, well, actually, I'm quite willing to do long only that's more illiquid if it delivers performance or hedge funds that have a hurdle.
37:23And so the whole world's changing. Everyone's thinking about these things. There's a lot of people for the first time I've seen a long, long time that's saying, I don't know what to do. I don't know how to think about things. Where do I go from here? What's going to happen to the world? So they'd be much more thoughtful in different ways. So when you get a call from an institution or friend that said, hey, there's this new fund, can you talk to them? What advice do you give a new fund manager? So let's say it's not someone who's likely to launch with a billion plus. So I had such a call earlier this year from someone I really respect who emailed me and said, hey, I just met this guy.
37:59I can't tell if he's brilliant or naive. Can you meet him for me? I said, fine. At the same time, I got introduced to the guy by two prime brokers and said, can you meet this guy? I met the guy. I put 45 minutes in my diary. I spent two and a half hours with him. And I think he's naive and brilliant. But just the passion he spoke with, he'd been thoughtful in every way about his structure, about his fees, how he's going to build a team out and everything. I spent two and a half hours with him. And then I've just helped him raise. He only took $300, but he raised $1 .2 billion. Who's the manager?
38:32It's called Black Sheep, Alex Fortune, based in Ireland. Comes out of Ennismore, between small and mid -cap Europe. And we sat there for three hours just a few weeks ago, deciding which investors he should take and which investors he shouldn't. And it's a great situation to be in. And I've said to him, there are two types of investors. There's asset owners and asset allocators. And you always want to work with asset owners, because you're speaking to the people whose money it is, who have final say. The asset allocators, it's not their money. They're investing it for someone else. So they're vulnerable to what that end investor's thinking.
39:04And then you're the third leg in that cog. And so you always have to wonder what they're thinking and then what the people behind them are thinking. You never really get to the end investor. We sat down, we went through this and thought about him. I got him his COO. And I was tough on him in terms of how he was thinking about stuff. So you're not thinking about it the right way. You need to do this, you need to do that. And it's been great. And we got some of the great ENFs invested in there. And he's going to be a rock star. Really feel good. So my advice, I say three things when I look at a presentation and say, really distinguish about how you're different.
39:36Because people always think they're different and they're not different. The second thing is, talk about the mistakes you've made and the lessons you've learned. Because that has had an impact on how you think about investing. And the third thing is, have a business plan. Because when investors invest, they're not just investing in a fund, they're investing in you and your business. And they want to understand what your vision is, right? You know this from Protégé, the stuff that you did, you're always looking about people's businesses. It wasn't just about the manager. What's their vision? What do they want to build?
40:03And then I say to people, the three things that will kill you are ego, speed, and leverage. And always remember that. Don't have any ego because as much as you can feel like you're taking over the world, it goes in a second. Why are you in a rush? You're early 30s, early 40s. You want to do this for 20, 30 years. So just wait for the right clients. Build it the right way. Do it slowly and you'll be fine. And leverage. It's fine to use leverage, but understand what that means, okay? What are the impacts on that? Whether it's leveraging the companies or leverage at the portfolio level. And people don't think about those things.
40:38So those are the pieces of advice I give to everyone. So a situation like this is probably atypical in that there's a rapid degree of success that turned out in raising money, even if you didn't know. How do you advise people that are struggling with the tension of making a business work economically versus trying to play the long game. In some cases, it's never going to work. And I'm quite honest with you about that and just say, listen, it's just not going to work. You just forget it. And there's other guys who are really good. There's another guy recently who just came out of a big shop. He needed an anchor investor.
41:13I helped him get an endowment on the West Coast, give him money. But it's a long, slow process. And understanding to him, investors don't think about what's their break even when they're starting, okay? Where are you spending that money? why do you need 10 people? You don't need 10 people. This again goes back to the point about thinking about building your business plan. Think about your assets, your infrastructure, your people. And over time, as they grow, what are you going to do with those? So I think people have a lot of misconceptions about what is the right thing to do. Anyone who leaves a big organization is a refugee, right?
41:42And when a refugee starts their life, they start with a lot less than they had before, okay? Whether it's financially, in terms of possessions and things. So the same way I think about these guys, well, you don't need that whole huge infrastructure and bureaucracy you had at your old place. You're leaving for a reason. OK, it's to do it your way and to do it simpler. So don't get bogged down in all the nonsense that goes with all of that. So I think people, it's fine to have big ambitions longer term, but start small and start simple. The biggest issues, I think the two biggest issues for startups is they overcomplicate everything and they don't take enough risk.
42:19Right. it's quite ironic now you see people saying the guy's great but he needs to perform he's not taking enough risk obviously you have the extremes of people take too much risk but I think if we think about all the big launches in the last 10 years people have raised 1, 2, 3, 4 billion at day one how many of them are still around? not that many so I kind of explain that to people time and time again just go slow think about these guys who launched they don't even exist anymore there's no rush take your time do it properly with the right people That's the only advice I can give. You need to have a passion for doing this, and it's about investing.
42:54And if I see people that don't have that passion, then what's the point? There's a couple of guys I met recently. They're smart, but they don't have that passion. They're too focused on what investors think and trying to say the right thing to those people, trying to say to them what they want to hear. It's the wrong way to think about it, right? So how about somebody in your shoes where you've had some great success that allows you to be patient to meet with people, maybe you're going to help them, at what point in time do you start navigating, okay, I want to get compensated for this, or I'm just taking lots of meetings and I'm happy to share my wisdom because I'm a teacher and that's what you are?
43:32Well, the regulations stopped me from getting compensated. But I think, look, the thing that everyone forgets about is if people are successful, it's good for our industry. I think everyone believes that, but so many people are so focused on themselves and it's about the greater good right so when i see bad news about hedge funds or investments in the newspaper i think it's a good thing why do i think it's a good thing because the people who really understand it won't run away from it but the people who don't they run away from it and the kinds of headlines that you see are people are scared about volatility they're scared about lockups they're not doing concentrated managers they're not doing this not doing that if you really dig into the headlines about who's saying that it's not the great and the good investors it's not the asset owners okay it's the asset allocators because they're trying to protect themselves and so I think I really really am conscious when people run away from this stuff is actually quite often the best time to invest I was just with one of one of the family offices that I work with in New York and he was telling me they have money with a manager they've been with since the beginning for 15 years he'd annualized 15 but he said his investors that only received nine percent annualized return I said how's that?
44:40He said, because people give him money at the wrong time and they take it at the wrong time. And I think that's the thing that people forget about this. This is a long game. It's a duration game. If you're not willing to think long -term, just don't do it. From the perspective of all the meetings you've had, everyone wants to know, you know, what are the smart people ask, the better investors? What are some of the best questions you've heard ask of managers from the investors, asset owners that you respect the most? there are so many i think there's two ways to look at it it's the questions and it's the process of the questions so i think some of the best questions have been about someone's personal life and background what's made them the way they are what's motivated them what what gives them the mindset that they have and i think people don't understand that they spend too much time focusing on the results rather than the process that's made someone become the way they are and how they've thought.
45:34The second thing is actually spending time with the individual team members and saying, especially for a day one startup, okay, this guy's going to run the firm. Do you trust him? Do you know that he's going to pay you the right way? Do you really feel he has the ability to take risk? Do you feel he's going to listen to you? And people don't cough and don't do that stuff. Third thing is really, really spending time on the business side of things. And people quite often don't spend time on that. Investments can blow up, but the firm gets things wrong in terms of operations, you're dead. And people don't spend the time doing that stuff.
46:07So I think it's really, really important to sort of look at both sides of that and people don't spend enough time doing that. But I think the psychology part of it is really getting inside someone's brain to understand what they're doing. And for me, post -crisis, I will say to everyone, only invest with someone who's blown up or been at a firm that's blown up. Because unless they've been through a tough time, you won't know how they're going to handle it, how they're going to treat their investors, how they're going to treat their team, are they going to stick to their strategy and i think the right investors ask those questions and say right tell me about this i've sat in meetings with a manager for example who said he wasn't invested in a certain stock that blew up and the investor was so smart he did the background said but you were invested you told me you weren't invested there's no hiding if good investors do their work they'll find out so that's why again i go to the point tell people about the mistakes you've made because if they understand what you did wrong and you've learned from it and you won't do it again then it's huge what are some of the worst horror stories you've had to deal with how long have you got i mean it's it's there are so many that i i can't even start i can't even begin to tell you stories about people leaving that i know are leaving but i can't say are leaving the market finds out they're leaving before they've left and all the rest of it investments in the portfolio that shouldn't have been in the portfolio.
47:31People claim they're not there. You know, I had one firm I worked with where the manager refused to put the top position in the portfolio, just forgot that it existed and just sort of talked about the rest of the portfolio, even though it was a big position. But that top name was something, it wasn't an equity position that they were investing, it was something else and they shouldn't have invested that. There was one manager I was helping in Asia who put his whole business at risk and he had a 63 % short position, which could have completely, luckily it worked for him, but it could have blown his whole business up and his fund and killed his investors.
48:07That's a new one even for me, 63 % short. 63 % short. So people take huge amounts of risk, huge, but there's some point where you've just got to step back and go, hold on. Look, from my perspective, it's just always being honest with people and telling them and helping them understand these are the risks for investment. It's managed, you've got to understand that. and I always try and like spend the beginning part of a meeting saying to people these are the reasons people don't invest with us right because that way they understand what are the things that people have concerns about and what are the things that people don't like about a manager and if you do that then straight away you've told people look this is the situation and if you want to do it do it great story I'll tell you 2006 I'm sitting in a meeting room I do two group meetings of 12 the first meeting I go in I talk about a manager everyone may as well have been asleep I even heard myself talking this is so boring I went to the second meeting I thought I'm gonna do it different I said these are the reasons people don't invest in this manager because of this this this this this and out of the 12 investors in that room eight of them invested because they understood it I took a pm eight years ago to a group a prime brokerage event and I told him to do the same thing and he said really and I said yes there were 20 people in the room at the beginning There were seven at the end who really had a good fruitful discussion with.
49:20Again, it's not a volume game. It's a quality game, right? I'd rather have five meetings in a day than two groups of 20 because the five one -on -ones are going to be much more fruitful and interesting than sitting there with 20 people, half of whom are asleep. People just forget that it's not about that. What's the most frustrated you ever were with a potential investor? oh i i you sit there and you you can hear from my voice the frustration in it you've done everything you can to that investor and you even said it doesn't matter if you don't invest just please tell me if you don't invest why you're not going to invest or let's stay in touch and they just disappear from the face of the earth and they don't return and it's fine but i've learned now i'm old enough and ugly enough to deal with that and it's fine the biggest frustration is this is all about relationships this whole industry is about relationships and people still forget that they think it's manager specific but it's not manager specific it's relationships and people just walk away in a heartbeat without thinking about things and it's everyone's invested time in that process so it doesn't make sense to just walk away and leave it because they've invested as much as i've invested in it it's fine if it ends up in nothing but don't just walk away and say hey we invested all that time and nothing happens it's fine but think about that i wish there were rules around that but there are no rules around that and it's fine and again for me having learned from that frustration there's one endowment i've known since i started in 1998 and i knew the cio we had great dialogue we talked about lots of ideas and just coincidentally we were speaking about her portfolio she wanted two types of managers and i gave her two managers she invested in both, 300 bucks in one go.
51:10And she said, Rahul, it's taken 15 years, but we got there. And I said, it didn't matter ever. What mattered to me is I could call you and you could call me and say, I'm looking for this. And do you know anyone? And that for me is when I put reality on that frustration, say, do you know what? It's fine because sometimes it takes that long. I'm going to turn to some lessons from another side of fundraising that you've done. We have gone back and forth over the years writing some small checks to each other for various charities. I know you've been involved in a lot. So why don't you talk a little bit about what you're passionate about on that side in the organizations, and then also similarities and differences in fundraising for a nonprofit organization from what you've been doing.
51:52I've been involved in charity fundraising as I was eight years old. I've always had a thing for it. I think the biggest peeve I have in the world is that people are not compassionate okay I think it's such a huge thing that us as a society forget about we're all about us and about now and it's just not the way the world works right I think my parents brought me up to be compassionate and I think that's one of the greatest things they gave me I studied development and that was one of my passions and that came through and when I got the job with Chris it was really utopia for me because my academic side of development along with working in finance all culminated in one place so it was a dream okay the guy was giving all this money to great development projects all over the world and I was working doing what I love doing and so I learned a lot from that and then over time I've become involved in a lot of charities all of them actually specifically which I didn't realize someone pointed out to me recently are all involved with kids so in UK I deal you know Friday night I had a fundraiser for the Marlborough Bush School which deals with the most severely traumatized kids that you can imagine there's 31 kids with 120 staff and on entrance six percent of them are involved in full -time education on an exit 100 of they're involved in so it's incredible work so they do amazing work so i've worked with them i worked with whiz kids which i'm a trusted which deals with disability and provided mobility equipment to disable kids from the moment they can move up to the age of 25 getting them jobs all that sort of stuff i work with the oldest playground in the UK which sits between three estates but what you call in the US projects and it's been incredible for taming relations in that community and stopping rivalry and really helping people grow up in a harmonious community together.
53:35I am chair of the board of a charity in California called Scientific Adventures for Girls which promotes STEM for girls in Oakland. Been incredible. Melinda Gates even wrote about us and the work we're doing. It's incredible because it makes little girls believe they can achieve anything they want to achieve which in that environment which is the bedrock of innovation it's so male dominated and people forget that actually girls can do a lot so we bought all of these girls that participate in those classes hidden figures movie and they all are just so inspired so it's really really important i'm now getting involved in a charity that deals with mental health for young people which is the issue of our generation so So there's tons and tons.
54:16I think last count was 12 different charities. And it's been said time and time again, if the elevators comes up to you and takes you up, you need to send it back down. And I think it's so important. There's only so much we all need. And it's really important to give back. And that's a good thing. And I would say that, again, I spend so much time with guys who are doing what I do, who are much younger, who are starting up. It's really important to help people. Because, again, if you all think the same way, it's just good for our industry. All nonprofits have a need to raise capital. So where have you seen lessons that, from your experience, were applicable to helping these nonprofits raise money?
54:53I think the difference, the key difference between nonprofits and profits is the ethics side of things. So I've been asked to be involved in a number of non -for -profits, but when I do the digging, there's a lot of ethical governance issues. So I think that's the first thing that I'd say that separates the two. The second thing is when you invest time with a non -for -profit and try to help them fundraise, you really need to find people who believe in that cause. But you have to try and find where there's a relatable story. So if someone's had an illness, then it's easier to raise for that cause from someone who's had that illness, that has compassion for that.
55:33There's other causes like disability which are harder because it's a minority group in society. people have misconceptions of what it means to be disabled how much government help they actually get what they have access to what they don't have access to so each of them is really really different but it's much more about a personal approach but i think it's trying to get people to have compassion and realize they're actually very lucky and they should give to causes so you're trying to approach it from both the cause point and the personal point whereas if you're fundraising for a manager like well here's an interesting idea that you want in your portfolio it's black and white it's much more black and white but a charity again you've got to just really help people understand what that charity is doing how they're spending money what the governance is like are they really achieving what they should be achieving is the money going to where it should be going and so spending a lot of time with that i think it's more intense to do charity fundraising than it is to do fundraising for asset managers.
56:35And if you flip it around the other way, have you learned anything from the intensity of raising money for the charities that helped you think about raising money for managers? It's made me longer and longer term. Because sometimes when you're trying to fundraise for a cause, you can apply for a grant 10 times before someone helps you. Same way when you're speaking to someone about investing in a manager, it can take 10 years it's fine doesn't matter so it's made me longer and longer in terms of my time horizon all right so you're working with parvis you're meeting with all these people we got 12 chariots how in the world do you spend your day i don't sleep a lot that's true i don't sleep a lot parvis takes a lot of my time and i have twins so they take a lot of my time so yeah look it's balancing and it's a lot to do but we've got one life and i want to do everything that i can do So that's always been me.
57:30I've always been like that. That's fantastic. All right, Raul, let's turn to some closing questions. What's your favorite hobby or activity outside of work and family? Traveling. Because you learn, you see things you'd never see, and you see things that you hoped you'd see. But I love meeting people, tasting different foods, seeing things which have an impact on you, not just physically but emotionally, spiritually. And when you learn, it just makes you a better person. I think it questions everything you've believed. So I love traveling. So what was your most recent trip that had an impact on you?
58:03Probably South Africa, where, you know, as a kid, I learned a lot about South Africa. We did a lot of studies on it at school. But actually going there and seeing this history and what happened and going and seeing and touching everything was incredible. 20 years ago, I wouldn't have been able to do that. So going there now and seeing it all was amazing. So understanding that struggle. And I have a lot of South African friends, but I walked away saying to all of them, I understand your psyche. Now I understand how you think, how you think, the way you think, why you think like that, which I never understood before.
58:34What's your biggest pet peeve? So personally, I think people that are not compassionate. Professionally, I think people are just too short term. Everything's about execution and life's just not about that. What reading do you almost never miss? it's really hard to say because i don't think i'm a consistent reader i almost get bored of reading the same thing again again because i think you almost fall into a mindset where you believe everything that comes from one source if you read it all the time whereas if you're constantly changing what you're reading then it broadens your mind so let's say there's x source of news that i follow every day you get into a mindset you're always going to believe that but if i'm following channel A one day, channel B another day, channel C another day, then I'm getting different perspectives on things.
59:22The same way if I read magazine A, then magazine D, then magazine C, it sort of changes. For my kids, I want them to be as broad -minded as possible. And I can't teach them that unless I believe that myself. So that's kind of how I think about it. What teaching from your parents has most stayed with you? Three things I say. Always be a good person. Okay. Always go with your gut instinct, because nine times out of 10, it is right. And be the best that you can be in whatever you do. It doesn't matter what you want to do with your life. Just always give it 200%. And just even if you don't come out on top, but you're giving it your best, that's all you can do.
59:56And if you can be the best, amazing. So those three things really. All right, last one. What life lesson have you learned that you wish you knew a lot earlier in life? Be rational. I think I spent a lot of time early in my life being emotional about things. And when you're emotional, you focus on execution. And when you're rational, you focus on duration. And I think that's really helped me in terms of how I think about things. So just think about it. If you're trying to fundraise for someone and you're emotional about it, you get really head up if they don't invest with you. And that means you're short term.
1:00:33But if you're long term and you're rational, you actually understand why people are thinking the way they're thinking. You're like, okay, the time may not be now, but I'm going to have a long -term relationship with this person. You're much more rational about it. And I think that sums it up in a nutshell. Terrific, Rahul. Thank you so much. Thank you, Ted. Really appreciate it. Thanks for listening to this episode. I hope you found a nugget or two to take away and apply in your investing and your life. If you'd like what you heard, please tell a friend and maybe even write a review on iTunes.
1:01:03You'll help others discover the show and I thank you for it. Have a good one and see you next time.
1:01:14For more information visit www .fema .org
From the publisher
Rahul Moodgal has spent 20 years as a fund raiser across long only strategies, hedge funds, fund of funds, customized solutions, start-ups, and non-profits. Collectively, Rahul has raised and helped raise $60 billion for firms since 2005. He started his career in the industry at powerhouse TT International, and later joined The Children’s Investment Fund (TCI) where he led the marketing effort that raised $20 billion in just 3½ years. Within TCI’s affiliate model, Rahul also was responsible for the largest India fund raise in history ($1 billion for TCI New Horizon Fund), and the largest sector fund launch in history ($1.1 billion for Algebris Investments).
Our conversation covers capital raising lessons learned from teaching, the value of transparency, the gold rush before 2008, the lean times afterwards, modern fee structures, the three key points to effective marketing, the three traits that will kill you, the two biggest issues start-up funds face, the best questions asked by leading allocators, and some of the worst horror stories in attempted capital raising. We close comparing by fund raising for charities and investment firms.
Learn More
Discuss show and Read the Transcript
Join Ted's mailing list at CapitalAllocatorsPodcast.com
Join the Capital Allocators Forum
Write a review on iTunes
Follow Ted on twitter at @tseides
For more episodes go to CapitalAllocatorsPodcast.com/Podcast


