In short
Podcast Summary: Capital Allocators – Unlocking Investment Wisdom (EP.352)
Episode Overview In this Thanksgiving episode, Ted Seides is featured as the guest, being interviewed by Sarah Samuels, head of manager research at NEPC and Board Chair of the CFA Society in Boston. This live recording at Wellington Management’s headquarters covers Ted’s investment career, anecdotes, and insights into the institutional investment industry.
---
Key Highlights
Background of Ted Seides
- Career Origins:
- Grew up in a non-business family; father was a psychiatrist, mother a preschool teacher.
- Developed an initial interest in stocks through family influences.
- Education:
- Took economics classes in college; inspired by David Swenson’s seminar at Yale.
- Worked at Yale Investment Office from 1992 to 1997, learning about investing from industry leaders.
Insights from Ted's Career
- Yale Investment Model:
- Worked during formative years when David Swenson established the endowment's success.
- Key principles: equity bias, diversification, search for inefficiencies, and alignment of interests.
- Investment Philosophy:
- Emphasizes the importance of understanding first principles in investment strategies.
- Highlights the misinterpretation of the Yale model, especially regarding illiquidity.
Transition to Capital Allocators
- Founding Protégé Partners:
- Shifted focus from direct investments to manager selection and fund-of-funds.
- Experienced the 2008 financial crisis and its impact on investment strategies.
- Creation of Capital Allocators:
- Launched the podcast to share discussions with institutional investors and asset managers.
- Developed into a platform for connecting the investment community.
Key Lessons and Advice
- Importance of Networking:
- Emphasizes the value of asking for help and building relationships in the investment industry.
- Expectations in Investment Careers:
- Advises new entrants to calibrate their expectations; passion for the process, rather than the outcome, is crucial for long-term success.
- Listening as a Skill:
- Discusses the art of listening in interviews, contrasting evaluative meetings with the conversational style of podcasting.
Discussion on Current Market Conditions
- Private Markets:
- Offers insights into the challenges and opportunities in private equity and private debt today.
- Discusses the implications of rising interest rates and valuation adjustments in private equity.
---
Conclusion Ted Seides shares a wealth of knowledge from his extensive career in investing, from his early experiences at Yale to establishing Capital Allocators. His reflections emphasize the significance of curiosity, relationship-building, and clear expectations in successful investing. The episode wraps up with Ted highlighting his personal growth and the lessons he's learned throughout his journey.
---
Upcoming Events
- Capital Allocators University:
- Aimed at allocators with 5-15 years of experience, scheduled for February 22nd in New York City.
Additional Resources
- Follow Ted Seides: [Twitter](https://twitter.com/tseides?lang=en) | [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/tedseides/)
- Website: [Capital Allocators](https://capitalallocators.com/) for more insights and to join the community.
---
This markdown summarizes the podcast episode, encapsulating key themes and discussions while providing a structured and accessible format for readers interested in institutional investing insights.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Capital Allocators is brought to you by my friends at WCM Investment Management. To outperform the markets, you have to do something differently from others. In my 30 -something years investing in managers, there may be no one I've come across who does that as clearly and as well as WCM. I've seen it up close as an investor in their international growth strategy for the last five years. WCM is a global equity investment manager, majority owned by its employees. They believe that being based on the West Coast, away from the influence of Wall Street groupthink, provides them with the freedom to live out their investment team's core values, think different, and get better.
0:43As advocates of integrating culture research into the investment process and advancing wide moat investing with the concept of moat trajectory, WCM has delivered differentiated returns while building concentrated portfolios designed to stand out from the crowd. WCM is committed to defying the status quo by dismantling outdated practices, believing in the extraordinary capabilities of its people, and fostering optimism to inspire each individual to become the best version of themselves. To learn more about WCM, visit their website at wcminvest .com. and tune into this slot on the show to hear more about WCM all year long.
1:27This testimonial is being provided by Ted Seides and capital allocators who have been compensated a flat fee by WCM. This payment was made in connection with capital allocators testimonial and production of podcasts and does not depend on the success or level of business generated. The opinions expressed are solely those of capital allocators and may not reflect the opinions of others. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principle. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please visit wcminvest .com for WCM's ADV and further information. Capital Allocators is also brought to you by Morningstar.
1:55What if data wasn't just a bunch of raw numbers, but a clear and decisive language to help connect investment strategies with long -term investor needs in a constantly evolving market landscape? Morningstar created that language, bringing order and utility to insight -rich data so you can prepare for your next opportunity, no matter the asset class or market. Visit wheredataspeaks .com to see what Morningstar data can do for you.
2:31Hello, I'm Ted Seides, and this is Capital Allocators. This show is an open exploration of the people and process behind capital allocation. Through conversations with leaders in the money game, we learn how these holders of the keys to the kingdom allocate their time and their capital. You can join our mailing list and access premium content at CapitalAllocators .com. All opinions expressed by TED and podcast guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of capital allocators or their firms. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions.
3:11Clients of capital allocators or podcast guests may maintain positions and securities discussed on this podcast. Happy Thanksgiving to everyone. For a little turkey treat, today's show has me on the other side of the mic. Sarah Samuels, the head of manager research at Powerhouse Consultant NEPC and a past guest on the show, is also the board chair of the CFA Society in Boston. She's created a podcast series for the society called Pull Up a Chair, and I was honored to be her inaugural guest. We recorded live in Wellington Management's headquarters earlier this month in front of a crowd that included Tim McCusker, the CIO at NEPC, and Gene Hines, the CEO of Wellington, and both past guests on the show.
4:00Sarah drew out some personal anecdotes about my investment career and a look at the business around capital allocators. At the end, I offer up a pitch for a children's book, Sarah wrote, that will release in April called Braving Your Savings. Keep your eye out for it in the coming months. Before we get going, we're hosting our fifth cohort of Capital Allocators University in New York City on February 22nd. CAU is designed for allocators with 5 to 15 years of experience to connect with each other and learn critical frameworks to help advance their careers. Rahul Moodgal and I will be joined by a few past guests on the show for a day filled with presentations about skills, Q &A, and small group discussions.
4:48For those who have attended one of the first four cohorts, we're now ready for you to return for a second semester too. Spots are limited, so hop on the website and register today. Thanks so much for spreading the word about Capital Allocators University. Please enjoy my turn on the other side of the mic with Sarah Samuels. Ted, you've got a fantastic career, most recently as the founder of Capital Allocators, which has millions of downloads. You have interviewed best -in -class investors. You have them tell their stories. You founded a hedge fund of fund called Protege. you made a major bet with Warren Buffett.
5:31Lost a major bet. And you were trained under David Swenson. Not too many of us can compete with this amazing background. And we can't wait to hear more about your story. You're usually behind the mic on the other side, and now you get to talk about yourself. Maybe if we could just go back to the early days, could you tell us a little bit about how you grew up and a foundational experience that formed who you are. Sure. My parents were not business people. My father was a doctor, actually a psychiatrist, which we can talk about at length. And my mother was a preschool teacher and administrator.
6:06There was money management in the family. My mother's younger brother passed away a couple years ago, this guy named Jim Rothenberg, who used to run Capital Group. So I knew about stocks, but we were an East Coast family. He was West Coast. So I never really spent a lot of time understanding anything about it. But my father used to watch the predecessor to CNBC, which was CNN, FN, and there were just tickers. And he would take out the newspaper and follow the stock. So I was interested in that, but I literally knew nothing about what it meant. And took some economics classes in college. One of them was a 250 -person seminar taught by this guy, David Swenson.
6:44And he mentioned that they hired one person a year, and that was my junior year. So my senior year, I applied and it was Wall Street stuff. And I graduated in 1992. So you're coming out of the recession. I just had the Goldman Sachs Global Investment Banking Analyst class in 1992 was 18 people. So it wasn't easy to get those kinds of jobs. In earnest, I didn't try that hard because all I ever heard about those jobs was how people worked all the time and were miserable. And then alongside it, there was this thing I'd heard about and I interviewed, and that was the first job offer I had. I didn't really understand a whole lot about it, except I really liked the people I interviewed with.
7:22And that was the beginning of my career. Okay. So you started your career at the Yale Investment Office. I did. That was my first job right out of college. Tell us a little bit about what that was like. It was amazing. So I was there from 1992 to 1997. And the reason those years are relevant is David didn't write his seminal book until 2000. He had joined in 1985, and after seven years, the portfolio really had taken shape in his image. And it was a new field. There were probably half a dozen professional endowment foundation investment offices in the entire country. There were probably a dozen pools of capital like that in the world.
8:03I didn't know that at the time because I didn't know anything. I just got to learn everything you could learn about investing from someone who was one of, if not the master in the business. And I also got to work with just an incredible group of people, both personally and professionally. So it was almost like the best family office you could imagine, but you're just showing up and winning every day. And at that point in time, it was easy to see why you were winning because David had such a clear way of thinking and it made so much sense. And yet nobody else was doing it. So year after year, you could win.
8:38And it was just a phenomenal place to be. What's an example of one of those easy wins or in hindsight, easy wins? Yeah. So back then, all the hedge funds that existed, Andy Golden, who later left and about to retire from Princeton, he managed what we call the absolute return portfolio. And all the hedge funds were on one sheet of paper and a little bit on the backside of the sheet. The game about trying to earn, call it an equity -like expected return with less risk than the equity markets, was only understanding the game was being played. There was no capital introduction on Wall Street. You had to know that existed, and then you had to have the governance structure that allowed you to go and do something that was different from what other people were doing.
9:22One of the stories I like to tell about that was three or four years after I was there, David and Dean Takashi went to New York for a set of meetings, and they came back, and they said, I can't believe this guy was managing a billion dollars, and we've never heard of him before. And his name was Louis Bacon. He was running more capital. And that was what it was like. Another example of that was the venture capital world, which has really driven a lot of the high -end endowment returns for decades. Back then, you had plenty of time to figure out who the best venture capitalists were. Other people weren't looking.
9:56These managers weren't closed. And Yale made a whole bunch of venture investments when David and Dean first got there because they thought it was a great area. Some of those were great. Some of them were terrible, but they weren't who the great people were. And they probably had 10 years to build a venture portfolio before there were capacity considerations. So those are the types of things that just by being there earlier than everybody else, there was a material advantage in being able to build relationships with great managers. I'd love to come back to the Yale model a little later in our discussion and maybe continue along your journey.
10:29You talked a little bit when we were prepping about some early lessons that you learned. especially through your interview rounds at Goldman Sachs. I mentioned that my uncle was running Capital Group. From whatever reason in my family, I grew up thinking I had to do everything by myself. And the idea of asking for help for anything was anathema to me. So I managed to go through Goldman Sachs into the final rounds of interviews and of not getting an offer, which is probably a driver of why I ended up at Yale. But I didn't think for a second to call my uncle and say, hey, do you happen to know anyone at Goldman Sachs?
11:03that might have helped. As it turned out, the capital was one of their largest clients at the time. So there was a huge lesson in that, that I really didn't internalize until probably 15 years ago of the importance of being willing to ask for help. You hear about it now in decision -making theory, which has really only taken off and certainly since I started the podcast and really with Annie Duke's work, not behavioral economics, but what to do about it. And the idea of having diverse opinions in a room and getting to good decisions wasn't something that was like part of my understanding and mindset growing up.
11:38Okay, great. So we were also just chatting about the things that we wish our parents had taught us and maybe realizing that they don't have all the information. So any advice that you have for people to expand their horizons and average tribe? I'll tell that quick story because I think it's a fun one. A dear friend of mine, And there's a psychologist in Pittsburgh, his name is Michael Mervash. And I've been involved in an experience he created called the Hero's Journey Foundation. And Michael was telling me this story that said, think about you're with your father and you walk down a riverbank and you approach a bridge and you say to him, hey, dad, let's cross the bridge.
12:18And he turns back and he says, what's a bridge? And it was this eye -opening thing that there are so many little things in your life that you wish your parents had taught you. And at some point in time, you get to that. and you realize they didn't teach you because no one taught them. And so we all have these gaps of knowledge and information. And that it comes back to this idea of being willing to ask for help, not feeling like you have to do everything on your own and the power of that. And it's still, by the way, it's still a struggle for me. I do it a lot more than I used to, but my instinct is to just go figure everything out on my own.
12:50Okay. So let's keep going with your career. What happened after you? So I came here and went to business school at Harvard. It was an interesting decision point because I loved what I did. From an intellectual perspective, I understood a lot about investing, but there wasn't thought that was a career. As I mentioned, there weren't any other opportunities. And David really liked keeping things quiet and insular. So you didn't build a network. And yet every money manager I met had gone to Harvard Business School, gone to Stanford Business School, whatever it was. And I had the opportunity to go to Harvard and I jumped at it.
13:22So I came up here, absolutely loved it, and then thought I wanted to pick stocks. I took a summer job with one of Yale's managers. It was the summer of 98. They were value long and high -flying bad businesses called dot -coms short. Amazon went from 40 to 260 the summer I worked for them, and they were short. It was an interesting time. I then went back to school and thought I wanted to dive in and understand businesses better and worked for a little private equity firm that Yale had money with. Learned that sometimes what you're on the outside, even if you're Yale, is very different from what you're on the inside.
13:55Joined another firm that a friend of mine from business school had brought me to, J .H. Whitney. And after a couple of years of feeling like I was not getting it, decided to go back to the manager side, manager selection. And that's when you founded Persia. What happened around then was David had written his book. And I had this obscure background from my five years there through business school a couple of years later. And all of a sudden, people started calling me, offering me jobs. And that was one of the signs that was like, maybe this is a better path for me. A lot of them were early fund to funds.
14:27And it was clear to me that people just wanted to monetize my resume. So I said, well, if I have an opportunity to do that for myself, I might as well try. And had connected a guy named Dan Stern, who had run the Ziff family office and the Reservoir Capital. And he was trying to put together an asset management firm. He was also involved in seeding, which I was really interested in because I love being closer to managers. And for a bunch of reasons, didn't end up doing it with Dan, but he had introduced me to guy Jeff Tarrant. And Jeff and I partnered and created what became Protégé Partners. Great.
14:57And from there, you had an opportunity to rethink what it is that you wanted to do, and fate stepped in and helped you find your way to capital allocators. There's a lot of steps along the way. Protégé was a 14 -year run. I would say that the insight of what do I want to do started around then. I missed an opportunity when I was at business school to take a class that would help you understand your career because I assumed I was way above that. Pretty stupid. But I had read the book, What Calls Your Parachute? And my bubbles were investing sports in people. And that was what led me to go back to picking managers because I was like, what better way can you put that together?
15:39When I left Protege, which was a combination like anything of internal reasons and external environment. I had no idea what I wanted to do. I thought I wanted to go back to multi -asset investing, probably in a nonprofit. But I found I was stuck between a CIO seat and a deputy CIO seat. So my friends, my peers were all CIOs. None of them would hire me as a deputy because they're like, you're at least as good as I am. And then everything had gone through recruiter. Dave Barrett, who's the lead recruiter for Endowments Foundations, is a good friend of mine. And Dave is like, yeah, you'll never get a job.
16:11because hedge funds in 2016 was the beginning of scrutiny. It has like, no, people want private equity. You're a hedge fund guy. I was like, okay. So I did a bunch of consulting and advisory gigs. I had written a book on startup hedge funds and I had appeared on a couple of podcasts from that. And I woke up one day and thought, huh, like I'd love to go run around and talk to my old endowment friends. And that became the bidding in the podcast. And from there, you've interviewed hundreds of people, managers and allocators and others, similar to what you were doing in your seat, evaluating hedge funds.
16:45So capital allocators, can you tell us a little bit about the components of this business that you've built? I wish I could remember who said this to me because it was such a great line, but there's two types of entrepreneurs. They're the ones you think about who have an idea and drive at it, right? They go get money from venture capitalists. They're going to change the world. And then there's the others where life just happens to them. I'm definitely in that latter camp. I used to describe what I was doing as the most reluctant entrepreneur in the world. I was looking for jobs. Tim, please, any PC needs someone like me.
17:17But I started this thing on the side. And I have an executive coach who happens to be my business school roommate. And a couple of years ago, he said, you're trying so hard to figure out what you want to do. Sometimes you just have to say, what's the world asking of you? And I just kept finding, I'd go talk to people about investing and doing it. All anyone wanted to talk to me about was the podcast. Now, the problem with the podcast as a business is it reminded me of the early days of the internet. And I would describe it as this. Here's the business, Sarah. You and I are going to have a conversation.
17:48We're going to share it for free, but we'll make it up in volume. The math of that doesn't make for a great business. So I never thought it could possibly be a business. And then after a couple of years, I had a bunch of other projects I was working on. And when the largest of those fell away, an advertiser called. It was Northern Trust. And they said, hey, do you take advertisers on your show? And I was like, yes, we do. And so that became what looked like a stream of a business. And about three years ago, I leaned into that. Now, it's not a great business. It's certainly not an asset management business.
18:23and it took a couple of years to figure out what's really happening. Why are people engaging and what can you do around that? I've learned that when I chase money, I do a really bad job. There are people who are incredible at commercializing things and that's just not me. So when I pursue my interests in investing intellectually, connecting people, like I describe myself now as a nonprofit investment banker, I just love doing it. And so then things come out of that. So as an example, money managers love coming on the show and they reach out almost as much as if you were at NEPC with trillion dollars at your behest, because why do they want to come on the show?
19:05It's turned out that over the years, it's by far the largest audience of institutional investors. So there's no better place that money manager can come. And they come on and really great things happen for them almost universally. There's obviously some selection on my part that goes into that. So the question becomes, does the listener really care if there's economic value created if I take a small sliver of that? And so the answer turned out when you experimented it was no. So a year ago, we started a sponsored insight series and the pitch became really easy, which is I source all the guests, you've reached out to me.
19:40So if you want to come on the show, you can sponsor a show. And that became a great monetization. and use case for the podcast. So we did that for the first time in spades this year. We call it the Sponsored Insights Series. We'll do 17 of them. And 15 are out. And all 15 have profusely thanked us for letting them come on the show, which my wife says to me, people are thanking you for paying you money, which is pretty cool when you're in that situation. So that was one. The other thing that happens is lots of people assume that because I interview you and Tim, that I know exactly what NEPC is doing with all their money.
20:17Now, clearly I don't, but there are a lot of situations where because you have this network effect of people that are listening, I don't have to know if you can bring the right people together. So we started doing summits this year. There was always convening power around the podcast, but I hate conferences. Yesterday I went to the Boston Investment Conference to benefit Boston Children's and the content was as good as anything I could imagine, but I promise you twice I did fall asleep listening. I just think it's impossible to go and listen to other people talk for five or six hours. I didn't want to do that.
20:52I only wanted to do an event that I wanted to go to start from finish. To do that, it's got to be fully participatory. And the benefit of it is you're bringing the people together and they can find each other. And so that became a business, but it wasn't so much because, oh, I want to be in the events business. In fact, I want to be in the events profession. You think about the difference between the business of investing and the profession of investing, I want to have the best of it. I don't care if it is maximizing the economics, but that's what's happened. And now there's an event business.
21:20There's the podcast, which is a business. I still advise a few managers every now and then. And it's the same kind of thing, just people that I think I can help strategically. And it's a lot of fun to do that. So for a person who had this belief that they could do it all on their own, you've really turned it around and are bringing people together all the time. To be fair, the inflection point in capital allocators as a business started when I hired a few people. And then it accelerated when I started forming partnerships with some other organizations. There's no way three of us, which is what it is, could do an event on our own.
21:52And so it shows, again, the power of not trying to do everything on your own. Yes. Okay. So tell us about Warren Buffett. How did you enter this bet with him? And what was at stake? So Warren's a gentleman in Omaha. huh? So in the summer of 2000, Warren always met students and he had said something a year or two before. It was the first time he was talking about fees and investment management. And he referred to the had rocks and the got rocks, meaning if the clients are the people who had the rocks and the money managers, the people who got the rocks and that the rocks transferred over. And so he was on his pulpit talking about fees.
22:32And I had seen a transcript of him talking to a group of students who apparently he had said something about hedge funds could never beat the market. And a student asked him about that. And he said, no one took me up on it. I must have been right. And so meanwhile, we had been doing very well in our fund. And I thought what he said was a little just too simple to be right. And so I sent him a one -page letter in the mail that was a little cheeky. I reprinted it in my first book to just show how you capture someone's attention. And then he responded. I'd heard he was legendary in how he responded to things.
23:08So I was curious about that, but that was about it. We went back and forth and it turned into this nonprofit that effectively hedge funds against the market. So he picked the Vanguard S &P 500 index fund. We picked five fund of funds for 10 years for a million dollars for charity. The bet started in January 1 of 2008. Big part of the reason why I was comfortable making the bet was because the market was trading in historical high valuations. When that happens, you don't expect the next 10 years will be good. Hedge funds do their own thing. You'd bet against anything but the S &P at that point in time, which that ended up being right at least for a couple of years.
23:43Hedge funds were the thing I understood. So that was the bet. And after 14 months, so February of 2009, hedge funds were up by 50%. The difference in those two return streams, if you look back over the past 10 or 15 years, was never more than 2 % or 3 % a year. And by all intents and purposes, the bet was over after 14 months. It turned out that wasn't the case. Fed came in and I don't think the hedge funds had another positive year since. So Warren won the bet by all. And then he let everybody know. Yeah, that's really fun. Okay, help us think through, we're coming back to the Yale model and your overall investment philosophy.
Read the full transcript
24:20Maybe help us understand and maybe debunk what the average market participant's understanding is of the Yale model versus what it was actually. David wrote his book to share a way of thinking about investing. All the people who worked for him always talked about first principles. Those first principles for a pool like Yale with very long duration assets, with very minimal spending needs, were to have an equity bias because those spending needs, while minimal on a year -to -year basis, are high. He needs to spend at roughly 5 % real, and that's a very high hurdle over a long period of time. He believed in diversification as the ultimate free lunch.
25:03He believed in searching for inefficiencies where you can find them. And then he believed deeply in alignment of interest for the staff, for the people that you'd employ as many managers. That is the Yale model, as David described. Now, he then spent the rest of the book talking about how he applied that thinking to Yale. So most people then read the book and said, oh, this is how you invest. Most of which is right, because those things are related particularly for similar pools of capital. But there are a number of things that David said in the book that are completely misinterpreted by other people.
25:39For a decade, I'd wanted to reread the book and I did it on vacation this summer. And then I wrote a little post called The Real Yale Model that talked about some of those things that I think people have misinterpreted about what David said. What's an example? The reason I wrote the post was the discussion of illiquity. Most of what you hear about people's interpretations of the Yale model is that David loved illiquidity. Let me say this very clearly. Nobody loves illiquidity. The problem with that as a prescription is that David started with the premise that you want diversification and equity orientation.
26:18Most of the pools of capital at that time were, call it some type of 70 -30 or 80 -20 risk, stocks, bonds. Most of the stocks were US. Most of the bonds were US for a US pool of capital. If you want to diversify your equity exposure away from the US equity market, by definition, everything else you do in the world is less liquid. You have to embrace some level of illiquidity in order to get the diversification. In the book, he described illiquidity as the unfortunate cousin of diversification. There's no choice. So the idea that David loved illiquidity is just flat out wrong. And so people then diving into illiquid assets because they think that's something David liked.
26:58The other thing is 25 years ago when he wrote the book, the other reason he liked looking at things that were less liquid is because other people didn't. And so there was more inefficiency and you could capture return. You could ask the question today, if you invest in large -scale private equity firm who's buying businesses at multiples higher than a comparable in the public markets, is that a good thing? I think David would have said no, but that hasn't stopped people from embracing private equity in part because they think that's what David liked. So what portfolio would David build today? You'd have to ask him.
27:36And unfortunately, we can't do that anymore. I don't know the answer to that. So let's rephrase. What about your views on private markets today and the value there? One of my favorite expressions about investing is if you think about your whole career, about what day was the hardest day to invest. People talk about financial crises, or maybe it's after the financial crisis, or was it like during COVID, or like the markets are ripping after COVID. All of that's wrong. The hardest day to invest is always today. Always. I look back and say, boy, there's been a bull market since I started in 1992.
28:12One of my first manager meetings was with Jeremy Grantham and he was talking about how the bull market had ended in 1992. So it's never easy. I think that the private markets today are a great example of that. Let's take private debt. Fresh money opportunities in private debt are really interesting because rates have gone up and there's a dearth of capital, particularly in the middle market. The problem with that is that the economy can't sustain itself on loans at 15%. It just won't work. It works for now, but I don't know if it's a great opportunity for 10 years. I don't know what that means for a rollover in the economy.
28:49Private equity depends where you are. We've got this really interesting period of time where people talk about marks, but let's not worry about mark, let's worry about activity. Private equity valuations have not fully reset. And the reason you know that is because all of a sudden you're starting to see articles about private equity firms not getting the financing they want. I've read another piece recently about NAV loans, which is the sort of the new thing trying to solve that problem. It has its own host of potential issues. The reason the private equity firms can't get the financing is because they're still trying to buy deals at valuations that are too high relative to what lenders are willing to lend.
29:28If you look at the last 15 or 20 years in private equity, a deal 20 years ago that might've been a eight to 10 times multiple with six turns of debt. Now trades at 16 times with six turns of debt. So there aren't leveraged buyouts anymore. They're just buyouts. And you get to this point in time where a lot of the private equity firms don't want to keep putting the capital that they have and equitize this when the cost of debt is so much higher. You're going to have some type of a shakeout. I don't know how that plays out. Is it evaluation compression? Is it the economy keeps roaring? It seems unlikely, but the economy keeps roaring and all these things grow into these valuations.
30:09But you're starting to see a slowdown in activity that's being driven by this uncertainty about valuations. And then you see more of that shake out on the venture side. But there are always pockets of opportunity and there's always inefficiencies. So they can be great places to play. It's just you have to be more careful. You have to be with the right people. All right. So that's a great view into your outlook for the markets and from a more top -down perspective. Tell us a little bit. You've talked in the past about how the thousands of managers you interviewed during your time as an investor, an allocator, those interviews were very different than the interviews that you're doing today on your podcast.
30:48And tell us if there's anything you would have done differently, anything you've learned through your podcast interviews to help those out there who are interviewing managers and selecting managers? No, that's a great question. It's very different. And I think that in all of my time interviewing managers, the output of those meetings was evaluative. It was, you're coming out of the meeting thinking, do I want to have another meeting with them? Do I want to invest with them? If I am invested with them, do I want to keep investing with them? There's always some next step that comes out of that meeting, which means you're constantly evaluating them.
31:27That brings on two challenges. In the meeting itself, it's really hard to listen to someone properly if you're evaluating them at the same time, if you're thinking about anything else at the same time. And so the podcast is a totally different thing. There's no evaluation. I'm on everyone's side, which is super fun for me. I like being on the team. And you're helping someone tell their story, but there's nothing else going on except for that conversation. And a couple of years into the podcast, I was for a long time on an investment committee at the Winter Grand Foundation in New York. And I went to meet with one of the managers that we had in the portfolio who I had known for 20 years.
32:06It was a hedge fund. And I had almost conditioned myself to interview in a slightly different way. It was a lot more personal because I just like that, someone's background and trying to figure out what makes them tick. And then you're going to talk about investing. And without even thinking about it, because I wasn't a professional investor anymore. I learned more about the person, what was going on in their fund, all the strengths and weaknesses in that meeting than I had in 20 years of talking to them. I went, wait, there's something to this. And so there is a process for how you think about listening and allowing that to happen and trying to set aside the valuation for another point in time that I think is very applicable.
32:41I recently released a podcast on capital allocators called The Art of Listening, where a friend of mine interviewed me about that. I went into detail about what is that process? When somebody says, be a good listener, that's great. Very few people tell you, how do you do that? And I pieced a few things together over my life that create a framework for how do you listen? When you hear that framework, you start to hear the same words people use over and over again in life. It's become a super valuable tool, both obviously for the podcast, but it's incredibly valuable in all aspects of investing because listening is so important to gather information.
33:15Probably on the home front as well in personal relationships. My wife would say I'm very good at this, except for my conversations with her. But I'm working on it. Excellent. All right. So you've interviewed, at this point, thousands of people, and they're all very successful. Are there any common traits that you have observed or pieces of advice that you would impart to our listeners who are the 6 ,000 CFHR holders in the Boston area as well as anyone else who chooses to download this? Yeah. So two different questions. On the first, are there any common traits? There are. All of these people are really smart, educated, motivated, driven, good -looking, super successful, right?
34:01One of the biggest challenges in money management is that people who have the characteristics that determine success, there are far more of them than end up being successful. Which gets to the second point about any advice. Life is about setting expectations properly. And so a lot of what ends up happening that I see, I was talking to a couple of second year HBS students yesterday and they're asking me about, oh, what would you do if you were starting a money management career? And then the thing I said was, make sure you have your expectations calibrated appropriately. It's an incredible profession and field that can keep you intellectually engaged your whole career.
34:41I don't think the remuneration for that in the future will be anything like it has been over the last 20 years. And so people who are deeply passionate about what they're actually doing, not the outcome of that, will have fabulous careers doing this. and the expression, do what you love, which is confusing when you're young because you don't know what you love. When Andy Golden says, do what you like. I didn't even hear that until I went to business school. So growing up, I didn't even understand that was a thing. And I stumbled into that with the podcast. So I have loved being around investing.
35:16I always thought I wanted to be an investor. I don't miss it for a second, but figuring out what it is that's this combination of what do you really enjoy spending your time at that? I work more hours now than I ever have before and I don't work at all. I really don't feel like I work anymore. So what do you really love and enjoy doing attached to? Ideally, is there a trend behind that can benefit you? And then who do you want to do it with is so important. Great. All right, we've covered a lot of ground. I'd like to close with one question, which is, can you tell us about a time in your life when you were brave and what impacted that half on your life?
35:58I can and I will, but I'm going to preface it for restating why you might be asking that. So Sarah has written a wonderful children's book called Braving Your Savings. And I was flattered that she asked me to endorse it, which I was very happy to do. Anyone who's listening to this, go get that book and send it to everyone you know. And you did ask me this. I told you it took me an entire week to come up, but the answer I wanted to give. So I believe in raising kids that quality time is a myth and that quantity is really what matters because you can't manufacture quality time. And I got divorced eight years ago and got that idea of quantity time taken away from me.
36:42In the years since, I think as any divorced and now happily remarried father tends to do, you tend to be what's called the fun dad, right? You try to manufacture that quality time and do everything you possibly can for your kids, sometimes at the expense of proper discipline and helping them understand that there are consequences for their actions because you live in this fear that they're not going to want to spend that time with you. And I did that for a number of years. And so the bravery that's come into my life and gets repeated weekly are those moments where I have to effectively tell my kids no for something, dealing with that fear that they certainly won't want to hear it, but I think it's the right thing for them.
37:30Thank you for sharing that. That's a really good one. Thank you so much, Ted. Thanks for listening to the show. To learn more, hop on our website at capitalallocators .com, where you can join our mailing list, access past shows, learn about our gatherings, and sign up for premium content, including podcast transcripts, my investment portfolio, and a lot more. Have a good one, and see you next time.
From the publisher
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone. For a little turkey treat, today’s show has me on the other side of the mike.
Sarah Samuels, the head of manager research at powerhouse consultant NEPC and a past guest on the show, is also the Board Chair of the CFA Society in Boston. She’s created a podcast series for the Society called “Pull Up a Chair,” and I was honored to be her inaugural guest.
We recorded live at Wellington Management’s headquarters earlier this month in front of a crowd that included Tim McCusker, the CIO at NEPC, and Jean Hynes, the CEO of Wellington. I’m a big fan of the collegial Boston investment community and was excited to participate.
Sarah drew out some personal anecdotes about my investment career and a look at the business around Capital Allocators.
At the end, I offer up a pitch for a children’s book Sarah wrote that will release in April called Braving Your Savings. Keep your eye out for it in the coming months.
Learn More
Follow Ted on Twitter at @tseides or LinkedIn
Subscribe to the mailing list
Access Transcript with Premium Membership


