In short
Podcast Summary: Capital Allocators – Inside the Institutional Investment Industry
Episode Title
WTT: The Investment Office Playbook - What Managers Don’t See
Episode Overview In this episode, Ted Seides discusses the intricacies of the investment office playbook, emphasizing what asset managers often overlook during their meetings with allocators. The central theme revolves around how new investment relationships are formed based on the allocator's playbook rather than the manager's qualifications or strategies.
---
Key Concepts
Investment Office Playbook
- Definition: A framework outlining how allocators (such as CIOs) operate and make investment decisions.
- Importance: Managers must understand this playbook to increase their chances of securing allocations.
Four Seasons of the Investment Office Playbook
- Governance
- The initial phase where a new CIO establishes their investment strategy and team.
- Minimal new investments occur; existing relationships heavily influence any allocations.
- Deployment
- The active phase where a CIO allocates funds based on their established strategy.
- This is the most favorable time for managers to seek allocations.
- Optimization
- A stage focused on refining the portfolio and correcting initial mistakes.
- Managers may face heightened competition for any new allocations.
- Maturity
- The CIO maintains a stable portfolio, making it challenging for new managers to break in.
- New allocations must replace existing investments, significantly raising the bar for new managers.
---
Detailed Breakdown of Each Season
- Governance
- Duration: First 1-2 years.
- Activities:
- Creation of an investment policy statement.
- Team recruitment.
- Strategy formulation.
- Note: Strong credentials alone are insufficient for securing allocations during this phase.
- Deployment
- Duration: 2-4 years following governance.
- Characteristics:
- High receptivity to new investment ideas.
- Exciting opportunities for asset managers that align with the CIO's strategy.
- Optimization
- Duration: Following deployment, lasting 2-4 years.
- Focus:
- Correcting past investment mistakes.
- Actively seeking better opportunities.
- Example: A CIO may initially make correct decisions only 70% of the time.
- Maturity
- Duration: 5-8 years in tenure.
- Features:
- Limited new allocations due to established relationships.
- Strong competition among existing managers for capital.
---
Transitioning Leadership
- The cycle repeats with a new CIO, albeit with some differences:
- Governance: New CIO refreshes strategy.
- Restructuring: Potential turnover in manager roster.
- Optimization: Ongoing adjustments and corrections.
- Maturity: Establishment of a stable portfolio once again.
Impacts of Funding Flows
- Offices with steady inflows (e.g., sovereign wealth funds) may continue to seek new opportunities even in mature phases.
- Conversely, offices with outflows (e.g., foundations) face intense competition for allocations.
---
Key Takeaways
- Understanding the investment office playbook is crucial for managers seeking allocations.
- Timing and the operational phase of the investment office significantly influence the likelihood of securing investments.
- Long tenure of CIOs correlates with better investment performance, reinforcing the need for continuity in leadership for optimal portfolio performance.
---
Conclusion Ted Seides concludes that for managers navigating the investment landscape, the key takeaway is that it often isn't about them—it's about understanding and aligning with the allocator's investment office playbook. This awareness can help maximize their chances of being included in an allocator's roster.
For additional insights and resources, listeners are encouraged to visit [capitalallocators.com](https://www.capitalallocators.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:04I've been thinking about the investment office playbook and what managers don't see when they meet with allocators. It happens hundreds of times a day. A money manager walks into the office of a prospective investor. They've never been more confident. A long track record of success, stellar short-term results, an ideal strategy for the times, and a first-rate team to execute. But they never see it coming. Five dreaded words go unstated as the manager wonders why the check never comes. It's not you, it's me. New investment relationships start when the manager fits into the allocator's playbook, not the other way around.
0:48Managers often only see the game from their perspective. What happens on the other side of the field significantly influences the likelihood of a new allocation. The investment office playbook takes place over four seasons, governance, deployment, optimization, and maturity. The seasons repeat each time a new CIO takes the helm. Other rules influencing investment activity include fund flows to the investment office and the CIO's tenure in the seat. A chart mapping out the investment office playbook under a new CIO looks like a bell curve with the year on the x-axis and the number of new investments made on the y-axis, with each stage summarized as follows.
1:36One, governance. A CIO comes into a new pool of capital and spends the first year or two creating the playbook for how they will operate and invest. Two, deployment. The investment office selects its roster of managers and puts money to work. Three, optimization. The team fine-tunes the portfolio, correcting mistakes, and upgrading the roster of managers. And four, maturity. The investment office patiently lets its all-star managers compound capital. Any new allocation must replace an existing one. The deployment and early optimization seasons are the golden period for managers to approach an investment office.
2:21In the governance and maturity stages, managers rarely are invited on the field. I'll describe the playbook in some more detail. Governance. It starts with a new pool of capital. The Australian superannuation funds are around 25 years old. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Investment Organization is five, and new family offices launch every year. Newly wealthy families or newly created institutions hire a CIO who spends the first year or two preparing the investment strategy. This period includes creating an investment policy statement, recruiting a team, and determining how to allocate the capital.
3:03Few new investments in funds occur during this time, and those that do arise from high conviction past relationships. No matter how strong a manager's credentials may be, they're unlikely to win a mandate from an investment office during the governance stage. Deployment. The next few years are the golden period for a manager to earn an allocation. After governance is complete, the CIO spends two to four years implementing the strategy. This is the most exciting and active period for the newly constituted investment office. Their eyes are wide open to opportunities, and great investment ideas in line with their strategy will find a spot on the roster.
3:50Optimization In the next season, the investment office will work to improve the quality of the portfolio. Money invested in the deployment stage will come with mistakes. David Moorhead, chief investment officer at Baylor University, believes he only got 70 % of his initial decisions correct. It took him another two to four years to rotate the remaining 30 % into better ideas. That 30 % also will have about a 70 % hit rate. So David has a few more years of making changes with the smaller proportion of the endowment to get to a steady state. Maturity. When the optimization stage is complete, the investment team enters the mature season.
4:35Around eight years into their tenure, the CIO has built a portfolio that mostly lets them sleep at night. Any new allocations to managers face severe competition for capital. New managers approaching the investment office may be outstanding, but they must replace an existing player on the field to find a place in the allocator's roster. Many allocators pride themselves on being long-term partners to their managers. Their identity is tied to that behavior, which makes the hurdle for a new manager to replace an existing one much higher. That's a wonderful characteristic if you're a manager in the portfolio, not so much if you're on the outside looking in.
5:20Part two of the investment office playbook. The mature season can last many years. Theoretically, it should last as long as the duration of the assets. Endowments, foundations, and sovereign wealth funds have perpetual time horizons. That's a long time. But that's not what happens. The members of the investment office do not live forever, and their career path rarely aligns with the playbook of their investment office. Anna Marshall pointed out on the Capital Allocators podcast that the investment team that gets an organization to the mature season may not be the right team to keep them there.
5:58Similarly, a CIO may look to play a different game by taking on a new challenge at a different organization. When a new leader takes charge in the investment office, part two of the playbook begins and repeats a similar arc to part one. The bell curve in part two looks just like the one in part one with a few tweaks. One, governance. The new CIO refreshes the governance and strategy in their image. This process takes a similar one to two years to the governance season in part one. Two, restructuring. Over the next year or two, the CIO may turn over the manager roster as they make their mark on the portfolio.
6:40Three, optimization. The CIO encounters mistakes in their decisions and finds better opportunities than they initially pursued, leading to more turnover in the manager roster. And four, maturity. After five to eight years, the investment office once again enters the mature season. Part two is rarely the end of the game either. In my podcast conversation about Carnegie Corporation of New York, Ellen Schumann, Kim Liu, Meredith Jenkins, and Elisa Maul discussed three transitions in leadership at Carnegie and three at other institutions where they took the helm after leaving Carnegie. Each instance had unique features, yet each also fit into the investment office playbook.
7:26Deepening the playbook, the shape of the curve. The flow of funds to an investment office influences the pace of investment allocations during each season. Investment offices receiving inflows, like those overseeing multifamily offices or sovereign wealth funds, may have a continuing need for deployment through the optimization and mature phases. Offices with steady outflows, like foundations and legacy single-family offices, may have a shorter deployment phase and even more intense competition for capital. Other offices, like OCIOs or fund-to-funds, are one step removed from the asset owner and have less control over funds flowing in or out of their portfolios.
8:09Another winning strategy, investment office duration. The tenure of a CIO is correlated with investment success. League tables of allocators, however annoying and irrelevant they may be, almost always show that investment offices with the longest-standing CIOs deliver the best performance over the long term. Yale, MIT, and Princeton all had one thing in common, long-serving leadership. The investment office playbook explains this dynamic. If it takes five to eight years for a CIO to reach optimization and maturity, then any organization whose CIO leaves before that time never gets a chance to pursue continuous improvement from an optimized portfolio.
8:55It's rare to see a sophisticated co-investment program, direct management of select assets, or niche and tactical opportunities implemented by an investment office that hasn't reached the mature season. I joined the Yale Investments Office seven years after David Swenson became chief investment officer. He had built a roster of incredible managers from top to bottom. It was a perfect time for me to learn the ropes and work on adding value through direct investments, secondaries, and one-off opportunistic strategies. But it was not a time for the active pursuit of new manager relationships. I can only imagine the incremental improvements David made over the quarter century after I left, each widening Yale's advantage over its peers.
9:43It's not you, it's me. For a manager seeking a new allocation, it's usually not about you. Managers who learn the playbook of the investment office are best prepared to understand when the time is right to maximize their chances of making the allocators roster. Thanks for listening to the show. If you like what you heard, hop on our website at capitalallocators.com where you can access past shows, join our mailing list, and sign up for premium content. Have a good one and see you next time.
From the publisher
I've been thinking about the investment office playbook and what managers don't see when they meet with allocators.
Read Ted’s blog here.


