Fast Money 8/27/26

27 Aug 2026 · 43 min · 18 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Fast Money 8/27/26 discusses: (1) Kevin Warsh’s upcoming Jackson Hole speech and what it could mean for Fed policy, rates, and market volatility; panelists debate whether he’ll be hawkish (“stay the course”) and how much guidance he’ll provide versus uncertainty.

Key claims

inflation is still above target while labor growth has decelerated; markets may react to Fed expectations shaped by other officials; AI-driven capex (NVIDIA and broader software) is inflationary.

Notable examples

VIX ~14.5 and S&P options implying <0.5% daily move; “ball vs referee” argument about the Fed. (2) Earnings/stock moves: Marvell (raised revenue target to ~$18B; Google warrant deal viewed as already priced; optical networking/custom chips growing >60%); Novo Nordisk downgraded by Deutsche Bank; Salesforce surges ~22.5% and is defended as “value” with AI integration; Gap rallies on margin/Old Navy CEO news; Gilead’s FDA approval of Bix Lenvo for certain HIV patients; McDonald’s weakness tied to consumer strain.

Guests

Dan Nathan (PGM? panelist), Guy Donnie (panelist), Tim Seymour (panelist, remote), Steve Leisman (CNBC reporter, Jackson Hole), Robert Tipp (PGM Credits Chief Investment Strategist, head of Global Bonds), Christina Parcinel (CNBC, Marvell earnings), Annika Kim Constantino (CNBC, Gilead FDA news), Bobby Behrig (Oakmark Select Fund portfolio manager).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Fed Chairman Warsh's Upcoming Speech

0:00 to 0:22

Discussion on the implications of Fed Chairman Warsh's upcoming speech at Jackson Hole.

“Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand.”

Fed Chairman Warsh's Upcoming Speech

1:46 to 2:56

Discussion on the implications of Fed Chairman Warsh's upcoming speech at Jackson Hole.

“It's going to be a big show, a ton to do.”

Market Reactions and Fed Policies

2:59 to 4:50

Analysis of market expectations and potential reactions to Warsh's speech.

“Well, I don't think we're going to get a whole lot from him.”

Debating Fed's Communication Strategy

4:52 to 7:12

A debate on the Fed's communication strategy and its impact on market decisions.

“And so from, you know, like the last year or so, we haven't minded rates going or at least, you know, inflation causing the rate picture to stay bid higher for longer.”

Inflation and Global Capex Dynamics

7:17 to 13:14

Discussion on inflation, global capital expenditures, and the economic outlook.

“If you're going to go into that trade it section, you've got to have more wider uncertainty bands about what the Fed's going to do.”

Warsh's Potential Impact on Markets

13:16 to 14:00

Exploring what Warsh might say and its implications for different markets.

“You care about the small caps in the equity market, Tim.”

Market Analysis and Fed Influence

14:00 to 19:00

Discussing the Fed's impact on the market and economic indicators.

“Warsh said the market is now looking at the ball, not the referee.”

Market Analysis and Fed Influence

21:32 to 22:00

Discussing the Fed's impact on the market and economic indicators.

“One moment you're cruising along, and the next, there's a shipping snag that has you scrambling.”

Marvell's Earnings Report and Market Reactions

23:10 to 28:00

Analyzing Marvell's earnings call, stock performance, and market implications.

“And some of the excitement around the deal came right back out of the stock.”

Show Opening and Upcoming Topics

28:00 to 29:12

Discussion of the show's highlights and upcoming topics including Novo Nordisk and Salesforce.

“Not only did we get Dan worked up, he's smiling.”
Show all 18 chapters

Novo Nordisk's Stock Downgrade Discussion

29:41 to 31:55

Analysis of Deutsche Bank's downgrade of Novo Nordisk and its implications.

“Because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love.”

Salesforce's Stellar Earnings Report

31:55 to 35:08

Exploration of Salesforce's impressive earnings and its implications for the tech sector.

“So, look, I'm biased as Tim is, and it's been a tough haul, but I still think you've got to own Novo here.”

Interview with Oakmark Partner on Value Stocks

35:08 to 40:00

Interview with Bobby Behrig discussing the value of Salesforce and other investments.

“And then if you want to play the ETF, we've been talking about this.”

Gap Earnings Report and Market Reactions

40:00 to 42:00

Analysis of Gap's recent earnings report and its impact on the stock market.

“but really is going to be a lot closer to a winner.”

Dollar General vs. Dollar Tree Valuation

42:00 to 42:41

A discussion on the valuation differences between Dollar General and Dollar Tree.

“I wasn't able to buy them because Tim got in before me and hoarded them all.”

FDA Approval of Gilead's New HIV Treatment

42:41 to 43:29

Details on the FDA's approval of Gilead's new pill aimed at simplifying HIV treatment.

“Annika Kim Constantino, what's going on?”

McDonald's Performance Concerns

43:29 to 44:32

Analysis of McDonald's declining stock performance and market conditions.

“McDonald's down 2.5%, third straight day of loss, now trading at its lowest level since July of 2024.”

Final Trades and Market Predictions

44:32 to 45:32

Hosts share their final trades and predictions on various stocks.

“Guy's got a story about eating 14 McDonald's hamburgers, but I will say that I think the unit economics in quick serve and fast food are really difficult right now.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features, so you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda. More of what matters most to you. Go to mazdausa.com to learn more. Consumer Reports does not endorse or promote any product. Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more.

0:43All curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. And no sifting to find exactly what you need, so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwab.com slash trading. Live from the NASDAQ market site, this is Fast Money. Here's what's ahead. The Jackson Hole Countdown. Fed Chairman Warsh on the clock, set to deliver what will arguably be his most important speech since becoming head of the Fed a couple months ago. Plus, the sizable software surge. Salesforce fueling a rip-roaring rebound with its best day ever, but is that revival for real?

1:21And then, inside NVIDIA's half a trillion dollar day, breaking down the dollar store dilemma, And we'll have a rather meaty, beefy conversation about Big Macs and McDonald's, Big Blues. Hi, everybody. I am Brian Sullivan in for Melissa once again coming to you live from Studio B right here at the NASDAQ. And on your desk tonight, we've got Dan Nathan, Guy Donnie and Tim Seymour. Welcome, everybody. It's going to be a big show, a ton to do. Let us jump right in and begin with the Fed, the chairman on the clock. Kevin Warsh, just hours away from delivering his highly anticipated keynote at the officially named Jackson Hole Economic Symposium.

2:04It is arguably, as we said, the most important speech since he took over as head of the Fed. We're going to get to Steve Leesman in a moment. But, Domi. Hello, Brian. You guys are throwing me off here. You're right there. Tim Seymour is remote, so I'm trying to figure it out. Is it that difficult? No, it's a little bit odd. By the way, the folks in the radio audience have no idea what you're talking about. What do you want to hear from Kevin Warsh tomorrow? Stay the course. Who's Stan? Stand your ground and stay the course. That's what I want to hear. He's been hawkish. He's been sort of dug in on this.

2:40It's a new Federal Reserve. I'm sort of on board with all this stuff. Again, he's been hawkish. Good for him. But does what's happened over the last week and a half in terms of what Treasury Secretary Besson has done, And does that change the narrative? I hope that it does not. And I hope to hear that tomorrow. Tim Seymour, how about you? Well, I don't think we're going to get a whole lot from him. Jackson Hole, historically, at least under the Powell regime, was a place for big headlines and possibly policy changes. And I just don't think that's where we are. Not only is the communication salvo not a salvo, but I think there's a sense that the Fed really is watching data that on different parts.

3:21The labor market is not getting away from us, but inflation is absolutely above. We're hearing from multiple Fed governors now that they believe the time to act is now. These are quotes out of today's regional Fed headlines. So I think a market that is looking for the Fed to be aggressive against inflation is probably not going to get that. But I don't think the Fed is going to give reasons for, call it bond bulls, to give the market a reason to actually rally. I don't think rates are coming down here. I feel like, Dan, we're in the streets of Pamplona because all the bulls are running, right?

3:56You've got the bond bulls running. You've got the stock bulls running. Energy's running. Crypto's running. Gold's running. Are we running on empty? That's why they pay you the big bucks here, Brian. I mean, that's some good stuff. I don't know. You know, I'm in like a slightly different camp. I'm not like some great Fed watcher. I'm certainly not an economist. I kind of feel like, you know, Warsh comes in. He kind of sets this kind of new tone about how they're going to communicate, you know, Fed policy. And, you know, to me, I feel like he's going to actually get painted into a corner a little bit.

4:26I think the market may do a thing. It might be the bond market. It might be the stock market. It may be all the markets. And, you know, I go back, Guy, to Q4 of 2018, you know, which Fed Chair Powell was in the seat for, what, about a year? He was kind of raising interest rates coming off that zero interest rate bound. And what happened in Q4, Guy? The stock market dropped? 19.9 percent, Brian, from Halloween until Christmas Eve. Right. And it forced Fed Chair Powell to pivot. I mean, and this is not something he wanted to do. And so from, you know, like the last year or so, we haven't minded rates going or at least, you know, inflation causing the rate picture to stay bid higher for longer.

5:01And, you know, we went from this kind of, you know, dovish stance of the prior few years to this hawkish stance. And, you know, here we are. Nothing's been done. And I don't think there's going to be anything done until after the midterms. But I do think there's a really good chance that the stock market, the bond market, maybe all of the above, kind of force his hand to give a bit more guidance and maybe actually do a pivot. And that's the point I was making about that. What was it? Christmas Eve, I think, where there was this big Fed pivot and then the market just took off. So guess what? So we're talking about stances, right?

5:32We've got the hawkish stance. We've got the dovish stance. We don't have the Nina Cherry Buffalo stance, although that was a quality song for the mid 90s. You know who probably knows? Steve Leisman. He's Steve Leisman, because he's actually there in Jackson. Also, Steve, here we go. So Tim said he didn't expect his own view. He didn't expect a whole lot from Chairman Walsh. But I also know that Chairman Walsh is not going to get up to the podium, I think, and go, hi, I'm Kevin Walsh. I'm the Fed chair. Thanks for coming. Goodbye. I mean, he's going to say something. Best guess? I think he's going to give the market more than it expects, but not as much as it wants.

6:08That would be the thing I would make, the best guess I would make. I've got three options where I think he could come out. One is he could sort of stick to his old guns, and that didn't work very well for the market. If you think about the options that he has, we're calling them for better or worse in terms of his options that he has, just because the pun was there to be had. And what you come up with, he could give a little bit more affirming that he would handle inflation with rate hikes. The market wanted to hear that last time. And he could give views on the economy, but no policy outlook.

6:38Look, my guess, guys, is he's going to basically make a distinction that, hey, I'm not going to give you all that stuff after a press conference. I'm speaking for a committee, but I can give more here when I'm speaking for myself. What markets want and what they expect to get, though, take a look here at our CNBC Fed survey. 32 % thought he'd be hawkish, 19 % neutral, zero dovish, and 45%, I guess, they sided with Tim Seymour, thought he'd give no guidance. Here's the danger, guys. As Warsh's colleagues in CNBC interviews and other media have not been shy about offering their outlook. So the danger for Warsh, they end up driving market expectations, rightly or wrongly, and not the chairman.

7:16That means greater uncertainty, Brian. If you're going to go into that trade it section, you've got to have more wider uncertainty bands about what the Fed's going to do. Yes. OK, so let's dig into that a little bit more, because I get we get it. He's not going to go up and say, well, you know, I want to raise rates and I'm calling on everybody to raise rates or cut rates, whatever it might be. But in giving the his economic outlook, I mean, your job, sort of all of our guests on CBC's job is kind of to try to parse through that riddle and figure out where the policy position may be. Is it not?

7:51Yes, that is absolutely what we try to do. And we get more or less information. And look, Brian, I've talked to people who say, you know, there's all this talk about everybody's like whining. They don't give us the information we had. But that's not what's happening. All they're saying is, if you want me to price something this narrowly, give me the information I need to price it. If you don't give me the information, I'll price it this narrowly. It's not whining. It's not emotion. It's just pay me if you don't actually give me the information. If that's the world we want to live in, if that's where Kevin Walsh thinks he has a better bead on policy, he should do that.

8:23That's fine. But the bond market is just going to react. The stock market is going to react. The problem is, Brian, as you know, the world is a very uncertain place. One of the things we thought we could do was game out what the Fed would do with interest rates. Well, if that's going away, well, that's just another uncertainty we have to deal with. And Warsh is not Powell. And we had a rather, you know, fiery but a substantive debate on Power Lunch with you and Rick and Jeff Kilburg earlier, Steve, about what, I guess, what Warsh will be different or how Warsh will be different than Powell and everybody.

8:56By the way, every Fed chair is going to be different from Bernanke to Yellen to Powell to Warsh. But Warsh is a markets guy originally, right? Working in the financial markets. Brian, when an anchor prompts a debate like you did, you should take a victory lap. That was one heck of a debate. And you did a good job fostering it. And if you take a step back from that debate, which I think is a fascinating one. And my colleagues, Rick and Jeff, have good points. And I think they were wrong, but I'm not going to belabor that point. The real question gets down to this. Is the Fed need a major overhaul or not?

9:36Is the process broken? Do we need regime change? And has Warsh made the point for the need to it? That's one of the things I'm reporting here. We're the elite of the central banking, monetary policy, economic community here. has Warsh convinced them that this regime change program that he's on is one that is needed and one that will lead to better monetary policy? Because if it's better monetary policy, I think you'll sign up every one of the attendees at this conference. If it's not, he's going to have continued opposition. Steve, you might have said this, so I apologize, but what are the thoughts on the following?

10:13Typically, the markets have been reacting to Federal Reserve and the rhetoric around it. Now he's saying, you know what, we're going to sit back and we're going to let you figure things out and we'll sort of react to markets. Is there is there some sort of truth in that? By the way, I'm all for it if in fact that's what's going on. So there people do think that's a good idea. I have a hard time figuring it out because it's the Fed that has to set the overnight rate. That's how the system works. I can't think of a market guy that would do the one that would do the setting. Which market do you want it to be?

10:50The tips market? The bond market? Is it the overnight rate market? Is it the gold market? Who should set that overnight rate? And which market guy, you have to ask yourself, will incorporate the congressional mandate of price stability and low unemployment? That is not any market that would do that. And plus, Guy and Tim and all the people around the table there and Dan, they have different interests. You guys don't have the same interests. Dan wants to go to more rock and roll shows. Timmy wants to play drums. Guy, I'm not sure what it is you do for your hobby, but you have different interests, and you would invest differently along that way.

11:25Brian wants to drive sports cars, right? So you all have different things you want to do. Are you going to set the rate at what level for that purpose? I do like it. And he's not wrong. Although we didn't get to Guy O'Donnell's Volare. No. You drive a Volare. I don't drive a Volare. I like to fish like Steve likes to fish. I like to fish. I think Steve's probably a much better fisherman. That's just my guess. I mean, fishing, it's not about being better at something. Fishing is actually a passion. No, no, no. I think Steve's a better fisherman. Tim Seymour, if you were going to put the hook in the proverbial water.

11:57Sammy is screaming in the back. If you're going to put the hook in the proverbial fed water, Tim Seymour, And I know you said you're not expecting a whole lot of firm headlines from Chairman Walsh. What would you want him to say that would keep this stock market rally going? What would be the best bait he could do for this market? See what I'm trying to do here? Yeah, I'm not taking your bait. I don't want him to spur the stock market on at all. I don't need him. I don't need him to light a fire under the equity market. It's got its own fire. In fact, if anything, I think that's what he's trying to stay away from.

12:31What I do want him to acknowledge somehow is that we live in a unique time in terms of global capex and the inflationary impacts of that. And I understand that there's a, you know, we tend to strip out food and energy and commodity volatility. But you can't tell me we're going to talk about NVIDIA a lot tonight. And we're going to talk about what essentially means that 1.3 trillion in capex around AI next year. That to me is inflationary. And so I think there's that entire dynamic and the fact that we've been above the Fed's target for five years. So I want to hear recognition of that. I think the bond market wants to hear recognition of that.

13:09And I don't care about the equity market. I care about the equity market. And I'll just tell you. I care about it, but I'm not looking for him to do that. I know. You care about the small caps in the equity market, Tim. But I'm looking at a VIX at 14 and a half. And I'm looking at the S &P. If I look at the SPY, the options market is implying less than a half a percent move tomorrow in either direction. I think that's really interesting, the level of complacency. I think the market is actually in Tim's camp right there because, you know, you just see you would think that the market would be pricing higher volatility, especially if you consider how important this speech is, Brian, how you staged it versus his last speech.

13:46In the last speech, there was some volatility after that. Steve. Yeah, just real quick. Everybody I talked to, just another answer to Guy's question, everybody I talked to said no matter what the Fed does, they will still try to price not what they think the Fed should do, but what they think the Fed will do. Warsh said the market is now looking at the ball, not the referee. Well, my argument with that is the Fed is the ball, not the referee. Well, I would say they're looking for maybe Warsh to be an estimated profit, but I will say this, that based on your backdrop, Steve, and lighting a fire under the market.

14:23We definitely have a fire on the mountain. That's Marshall Tucker. No, it's not Marshall Tucker. That's Stella Blues. Steve, let me go. Steve Leisman, despite that, have a good night. Steve, thank you. Thank you. All right. Joining us here on set, Robert Tipp. He is PGM Credits Chief Investment Strategist, head of Global Bonds. Robert, good to have you on. Good to be here. Thanks very much. All right. Is there anything, I know you're the debt market guy, but you're a macroeconomist. You could talk to this. Is there anything that Warsh can say tomorrow? I mean, I guess there is. But do you expect him to say something that could derail everything?

15:00Oh, no, I don't expect him to say anything. He's going to say something. He's going to be there, but you know. What's he going to say then? If everybody says he's not going to say anything, he has to say something. Yeah, you know, he's in a tough spot. Inflation has been high for five years. But what people don't realize is the rate of job growth in this economy has decelerated from 5 % year-over-year growth to 4 % to 3 % to 2 % to 1%, and now it's at zero. That's over the last five years. The other thing that's not appreciated is when you look at the CPI, core CPI, it has decelerated a lot. It was above 6%.

15:32It's come down. By some measures, the last few months, I mean, we had a negative reading. It's extremely low. Now, so he is resetting the table. This was an easy job. Inflation would be down. The economy would be doing great. but he wants to come in there get his committees regroup this will also get him past the election maybe and then start setting policy aggressively if it needs to be changed next year or not well if he's he's in that that sylin charybdis sort of rock in a hard place moment right you see what that reference there it's educated reference where he's stuck between those rocks how does he navigate those two mandates?

16:11Sure. Well, I think he's going to wait six months, you know, or a few months, a few more months, and see how things shake out. I mean, you've got negative job numbers from positive, and the inflation numbers have dropped. So is this temporary? And I think the World Cup has possibly introduced some noise here as well as Amazon month. The stats are very difficult. So the economy is doing very well. Inflation is decelerating, but so is job growth. he could easily knock this thing, you know, down into the recession. And they're always a surprise. So one of his committees is on productivity, job growth.

16:44We all know the AI things out there. It's going to make sure that what we're seeing in decelerating in jobs isn't something to do with what's going on with all the CapEx. So what you seemingly are saying, correct me, please, as most people do, I mean, inflation is a problem, albeit seemingly getting better, and the labor market is deteriorating. That's not a good place to be in, as Brian just said. That is the word stagflation that nobody seems to want to say, but apparently it's not that far away if you sort of look at the numbers. Yeah, the headline, the top line growth in this economy is really good.

17:15The profit growth is phenomenal. And job growth doesn't usually go negative. Well, even away from the AI, it's still extremely solid. And you usually don't get a job market recession when profits are rising strongly. So I don't think there's a risk of that. The market now is already braced for a couple few Fed rate hikes. That's totally different than where we were for a year. March of last year through March of this year, Mark was looking for the Fed rate to go down to three. It's braced for a couple of hikes. So I think we're in for a consolidation in the next six months. It should be OK for the markets.

17:49And then we'll find out next year what the real plan is. But we'll also know more about the economy. How big of an event, very quickly, how big of an event is September 9th with the Treasury? That's when the Treasury's going to be buying. Right. That's their next operation. That's when they're going to set the schedule for the next quarter. Yes. And everyone wants to know what are they going to do. Yeah. Given Besson's recent announcement. Yeah. And, you know, everybody likes to be a critic. I'm just watching what's going on out there. And I will tell you, for the last year or two, the U.S. long bond has been the best performer relative to France, relative to Germany, certainly relative to Japan, the U.K., relative to whether you're looking at interest rate swaps or in absolute basis point changes.

18:30So I think the Fed has held off on issuing more treasuries. You can argue about whether you like that or you don't like that, but they have been successful. They saw some rise in interest rates. They've stepped in to boost this program and uncap it. They're going from$0 to$2 billion max to what could be a$4 billion floor for each of the purchases. So, you know, he could be successful in containing the long rates. Robert Tipp, PGM. Robert, really appreciate your insight and your time. Thank you very much. Thank you. Yeah, I think something Tipp said is really important, and I don't think it's kind of focused on enough.

19:04You know, if you think about all this CapEx, it was kind of reinforced today by the numbers that we saw, obviously out of NVIDIA, but it was also the security guys. It was also out of software, and you might see like a ramp up in software CapEx too, right, in the SaaS enterprise space. Very inflationary. Right. And if I look at the market and I look at what's performing and I look at that earnings growth that, you know, he just mentioned here. Think about how many different sectors in the market now are being driven in and around this A.I. CapEx boom. There's energy components of it. There's industrial components of it.

19:33I mean, the list keeps going on and on. And so to me, I think that, yes, this feels great today. But at some point in the not so distant future, if there is a rate shock like Guy has been suggesting, if there is a continued energy shock, if there continues to be this bipartisan political backlash against creating these data centers, I just think there's a lot of things that people are not pricing in right now. And I do think that it's taken up a good bit of the economy and some of the growth that we're seeing right now, which, make no mistake about it, is extraordinary. Well, and by the way, not only is that extraordinary, we're going to take a break and talk about all the other extraordinary stuff that's going on.

20:13Coming up, the next trillion-dollar chipmaker. That's what NVIDIA's Jensen Wong said about Marvell earlier this year, what the just-reported numbers could do for the stock. Speaking of NVIDIA, that stock having its best day in more than a year, adding an intel in value today. We're back in two minutes.

20:37With the Discover Cashback card, it's payback time when you earn cash back on everyday purchases. Activate and earn 5 % cash back at different categories each quarter on up to$1 ,500 in purchases. That's 5 % cash back at different places each quarter, like grocery stores, on gas, and at restaurants. It pays to discover. Terms apply. See discover.com slash 5 for details. Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more.

21:17All curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. And no sifting to find exactly what you need, so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwab.com slash trading. Every day as a small business owner, it feels like solving a puzzle. One moment you're cruising along, and the next, there's a shipping snag that has you scrambling. But here's a surprise you will like. With Progressive, small business owners save 10 % or more on their commercial auto insurance when they pay in full. So go ahead, surprise yourself.

21:49Get a quote in as little as eight minutes at ProgressiveCommercial.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Discounts not available in all states or situations.

22:00All right, welcome back to Fast Money. Marvell, the semiconductor company, taking a leg lower in the last few minutes, down about 4%. The earning call coming out, it's ongoing. Christina Parcinel is here to take us inside the numbers, take us inside the call. Okay, same message we're hearing everywhere. We know this. The AI build-out is accelerating, not cooling off. Stock still falling, actually down 6 % now. The good. CEO Matt Murphy raised the company's revenue target for next year to roughly$18 billion. You actually saw the stock turn around after hours when he said that on the call, and to roughly 50 % growth next year.

22:32The engine is the data center. Again, this company makes custom chips, also does networking. Murphy says that the business is now growing more than 60 percent driven by the optical parts that connect AI servers and by custom chips, which he expects to more than double. Why is the stock falling, though? I got asked that from a producer. I know it's very dramatic, but. Why did you just sing that? I don't know. It's been a long day. It comes back to that big warrant deal with Google from last week, the one Wall Street treated as upside on top of everything else on the call. The CEO said the revenue from that deal for next year is already baked into Marbell's numbers.

Read the full transcript

23:07It's not exactly extra. The bigger payoff, he says, comes the year after. And that's what cooled things off. Wall Street heard already included. And some of the excitement around the deal came right back out of the stock. The sell off also a case. So we've seen a lot of these names of high expectations. It was very owned or I should say this run up. But one hundred eighty four percent year to date into the print today, into the close. almost 30 % just in the past month. Don't forget, CEO NVIDIA also called it a future$1 trillion company. We'll see how long that takes. Why? I mean, maybe you can't answer this.

23:40Why would Jensen Wong want to call another company a trillion-dollar company? Like, I know they're partners, I guess, but like... He's hyping up all of the suppliers and stuff, keeping the good relationship. He did that with the quantum names several years back at GTC. He talks about Nebias. He talks about Dell. He does that all the time. Yeah, but you just don't hear other companies ever talk about other companies like that. And why is he such a successful CEO? Well, I guess. I'm just curious. You just don't hear it. Do you hear this guy? No, you don't. It's interesting. You hear Chevron being like, well, Exxon's a zillion-dollar company.

24:10They're fantastic. Much better than us. Well, there's frenemies that happen in the tech world. It's very different. They all work together, and then they also all are competing with each other. Co-opetition? Frenemies. Did you just make that up? No. No. No? That's a thing? Well, I mean, it goes back to that diagram that we've seen on Twitter now for the last year or so. That diagram which puts, again, everything in the middle between OpenAI and NVIDIA and the circular nature of all these different things. So as Christina just correctly said, it's in his best interest for all of these companies to do well, it seems like.

24:39Tim Seymour, your take on Marvell? I think where they sit also in between the chip makers and the hyperscalers and certainly networking and data center are hot areas. And they tend to be more on the picks and the shovels than the end. And I mean, yes, it's part of the rotation we've seen. I just, we don't know what the multiple should be on this name. We know what it looks like in the last trailing month. We know what the guidance is going forward. That guide was fantastic. It's not a name I own. It's not a name that I feel I need to own. Why not? I just don't invest in that part of the tree. I mean, to me, I'd rather own NVIDIA here at a much more attractive valuation.

25:24I agree with Tim. I mean, if you're looking at where NVIDIA is trading, given that guidance, and again, you know, it's one thing to kind of start to discount and see the deceleration. I've been saying this for a while, but this is a company now that keeps beating and then raising. You know, when you consider where 27 calendar year was for estimates for, you know, EPS and sales, I mean, they just rate it. Now it's like 70 percent or something like that. The one thing I'll just say about Marvell and I'll say about Jensen and, you know, the investment they're making, you know, they have their three top customers, both of them.

25:51It's Microsoft, it's Google, and it's Amazon. Like, their NVIDIA's three top customers, and their Marvell's three top customers. And I think what it says is that, you know, Jensen doesn't care. He's just going to keep throwing money in and around. What did we start the show off? He's going to buy Hugging Face. He's going to buy Poolside. He's going to do all this stuff. It doesn't matter. You're just creating. We're going to start tonight's show with that. I think Mike talked about it at the end of the show. That was Mike's show. Laura Martin, the great Needham analyst who's been on this show many times, been on this network many times, super smart.

26:18You know what she said, Christina? Gina, one in every four hyperscaler investment dollars is going to NVIDIA. One in every four. That's incredible. I guess we've come full circle as to why he can say this. He can speak positively about whoever because the money keeps going back to him. For those wondering about Marvell, though, another big catalyst would be October 6th, their investor day. On the call right now, he's mentioned it many times, their long-term strategy. So perhaps they'll be sharing more details of Google and what that will mean for the following year. And maybe that would help anybody that gets in tomorrow morning with the sell-off.

26:51NVIDIA added, what, an Intel value today? Today! Why are you yelling at her? I'm not yelling at her. I'm yelling with her. She's smacking the table. This goes back to the way we started last night's show. In case he forgets. Marvell trades at twice the valuation. 50 times forward earnings. I have it a little less. I have it at 39. It doesn't matter. The point is it's trading at twice the valuation of NVIDIA with not nearly the metrics of NVIDIA. So what does the market see that I don't see? Yeah, and I would add one other thing. So one in every$4 from the hyperscale is going to NVIDIA. Well, you know where that's coming from?

27:29It's coming from free cash flow. It's coming from cash balances. It's coming from the debt markets. It's coming from private credit. It's coming from all this stuff that you can't see. And I think that's something that's not appreciated on a day like today. Because if you do ultimately see a pullback, who knows when that's going to be selling maybe$29 or something like that. I mean, that's where this all, I think, the rubber hits the road a little bit, because it's really easy to say that they're taking 25 percent of the hyperscaler spend, but they're also backstopping 25 percent of the spend going forward.

27:55And they're throwing out tens, if not hundreds of billions of dollars to keep this ecosystem going. See, we got him. Not only did we get Dan worked up, he's smiling. Look, we got Dan's all happy now. He's happy. Everybody's happy. Diesel day. That's it. Diesel. Diesel. Christina, thank you very much. I guess I missed the diesel joke. No, no, you made Dan smile. That's a nice thing. There's a lot more fast money. Here's what's ahead. Novo Nordisk takes a sick day. The Wall Street downgrade weighing down shares today. And how to size up weight loss drug competition now. Plus, Salesforce up in the clouds.

28:30The software giant soaring after earnings. One fund manager makes the case it's still seriously undervalued. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.

29:12Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more. All curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. And no sifting to find exactly what you need, so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwab.com slash trading. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds.

29:46Because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love. Like those iced lattes that help you get ready to face the day. So switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save. And keep sipping away. Get your quote today at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states.

30:19All right, welcome and welcome back to Fast Money. The GOP weight loss drugs, they may be hot, but one stock related to them apparently is not. Deutsche Bank downgrading Novo Nordisk. They are worried about growth. Shares down about 7 % in the past month. Tim, you own this one. What's your take on Novo? Yeah, I get the disappointment or the lack of excitement around where revenues are. Right now, a lot of the street has revenues anywhere from flat next year to kind of 4 % or 5 % CAGR over the next few years. Still the number one GLP maker, less generic erosion. The oral Wagovi launch has been, I think, exceptional.

31:02So I just, you know, 12 times, which is trading cheap to peers, cheap to itself. I don't know what you need to do. I don't know why you have to downgrade it here. I realize I sound like, how dare you? But I just don't see the downgrade. I see that there's not a reason to drive it higher if that's your view. I wouldn't be downgrading here. Isn't this in your acronym, Guy Dami? Did somebody just say that in your ear, didn't they? No, it's in the prompter. Oh. It's the N in my junk. Now, I could have picked a better N, I guess, as it turns out, because Nova's had a terrible year. But that's why, you know, dance with the girl you brought to the prom, as they say.

31:37And this downgrade is basically saying they don't deserve a 13 and a half, 14 multiple. They deserve an 11 multiple, given their growth and given the fact that there are only so many investment dollars to go around in big cap pharma. So I understand it. I don't agree with it because I think they're completely discounting the rest of their business. If this was just a GLP one company, then we could have that conversation because they're clearly losing. However, it's not. So, look, I'm biased as Tim is, and it's been a tough haul, but I still think you've got to own Novo here. All right. Well, you get it for a little bit of a discount.

32:09If you liked him before, you must love him now. Coming up, a value fund trading like a growth play on deck. A money manager whose fund has surged 20 % in the past three months, and some of it is thanks to a big bet on Salesforce.

32:29All right, welcome back. Stocks popping today led by technology. The Nasdaq up more than 1%. Along with energy, big tech was the only group rising today. But guess what? Big tech, more than enough. Other stocks on the move right now, workday. Initially lower, now higher. Gave earnings, better than expected numbers. You have rubric. It is down. It also had what, on the surface, were pretty strong results. Rubric is off today. Affirm, meanwhile, higher after revenues came in. higher than expected. Big post earnings moves in the names that we brought you last night. Okta and CrowdStrike each rallying double digits, by the way.

33:08CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz will be on Mad Money tonight, 6 p.m. Eastern. Dig more into those results. And you may already know this, but if not, we're going to show you again because we have to. Salesforce posting one of, I think, its best day ever up 22.5%. Dan, what a move, your take on Salesforce. Well, you know, this is really interesting. Okay. So I talked to a lot of private tech investors, VCs, right? And this is something that despite them piling money after good money, after good money, after good money, and all of these AI companies for the last three, four years, they were really kind of scratching their heads about the SaaSpocalypse too.

33:46So both things could have been true. You could have been betting on what AI was going to do to the economy, what it was going to do to tech broadly, but you didn't actually have to throw out Baby with the Bathwater like a Salesforce or something like that. Salesforce was routinely the name that most folks would say, this is your system of record. This needs to be in almost every business that exists out there. We heard that last night when Jim Cramer was interviewing Mark Benioff and Dario, and Dario said, hey, listen, we have, you know, we have Salesforce and everything. We're not ripping it out.

34:15So, again, I can't, this 22.5 % move. It seems a little crazy. I got to give Guy credit. This guy doesn't give himself credit. You've been pounding the table on software. You think these things were overdone for a very long time. And I think today is that reason. But if you're going to go out and try to buy every other SaaS name because of what Salesforce was just able to do or OpenAI is going to be the next one to partner with such and such, it's probably not going to be a take it to the bank trade. I think it was February or March. I don't remember exactly when Salesforce reported earnings announced a$50 billion stock buyback, which for Salesforce was almost a third of their market cap.

34:49And I was excited about it. And for a day, the market was as well. And then they subsequently sold off in April. But I think people coming around to the fact that maybe the software, again, Armageddon, whatever people are calling it, is a little sort of overdone. And now you're starting to see, I mean, look at the move in Microsoft over the last month or so. Look at this move in Salesforce. And then if you want to play the ETF, we've been talking about this. IGV at 110 still has room to go on the upside, I believe. Thank you for not saying saspocalypse, by the way. I knew I'd like you. I cannot stand that term.

35:19Because nobody knows what it means except for, like, you guys and eight other people. Eight? Sassational. Well, can I say one thing? I think this is really important. If they don't announce this deal with Anthropic today or yesterday, this stock's up, like, 5 % or 6%. I mean, it's not like those numbers were actually blowout. I just think that a lot of folks thought it was a bit of a sea change. All right. Speaking of Salesforce, it is the top holding of the Oakmark Select Fund. And even though that is technically a value fund, they've been boosting exposure to Salesforce for more than a year.

35:51Let's find out why I'm bringing Oakmark, Harris Oakmark partner, Bobby Behrig. He is one of Oakmark Select Fund's portfolio managers. Bobby, you have a value fund. Was Salesforce a value stock? Great to be with you guys. I think Salesforce is very much a value stock. You know, these SaaS fears, as you guys have been talking about, they're greatly overdone. I think people have wanted to put all of software into like an AI loser bucket. And we are big believers in the power of AI, but we think software companies can succeed at the same time. And I think Salesforce is just a great example. As you mentioned, it's our largest position.

36:32One of the biggest enterprise software businesses out there. Salesforce really can integrate AI into their system of record. They can make their products more valuable to users. So we think AI makes Salesforce a lot stronger. Hey, Bobby, Tim. So I saw 11 % top-line growth. The EPS flew it out, but that was more mark-to-market on investments. Isn't that appropriate for where the company was trading, kind of either even post numbers or pre numbers? It doesn't matter. Even after today's move, right. It's not a big multiple. But where do you see the growth line on the top line for, as you say, the largest enterprise player?

37:14Sure. So in the first half of the year, Salesforce has grown revenues organically around 7 percent. We see that growth rate accelerating into the second half of this year. And we think growth can get into the high single, if not the low double digits, looking ahead to next year. And margins are continuing to go up along with that. So we see today's results as really a big step toward validating our thesis. I mean, if you look at what they talked about today, you can see customer retention going up, contract length extending, revenue, as I said, accelerating. So, you know, this is a company that saw AgentForce, ARR, increasing 240 % year over year.

38:01That's a big deal. So we think the excitement is very much warranted. Which would you say, I guess, in the SaaS space, what names aside from Salesforce do you think have like a similar makeup that actually have that sort of durability and are going to be able to not exactly disrupt themselves, but adopt the technology and really kind of take the ability to just kind of demonstrate to clients that they are going to be able to add value because of the integration of the technology? Sure. You know, Oakmark Select, we're a concentrated fund, and I think it's important to be selective and be choosy.

38:37Another example would be Paycom, which is a payroll software company that is buying back 20 percent of their shares this year. So we think they're also very much a durable business that is going to benefit from some of the technology changes that that are taking off right now. QV lives in a similar world in health care. So I think that's one of your other large holdings. Can you speak because that's at a huge run now? It looks exactly like the Salesforce chart. Sure. I think I would say that, you know, we talk about the SaaS apocalypse. I know we maybe don't like that word, but, you know, that was sort of the epicenter of kind of this earthquake.

39:15But it really, these AI fears really rippled out from there and hit a lot of information and data businesses, service companies that are kind of adjacent to software. And IQVIA, as well as another pharma services company called ICON, are good examples of that. They do clinical trials outsourcing. They've got a lot of data. They serve the large pharma and biotech companies. And these are businesses that are selling even still in the teens on their forward earnings. And they typically sell well into the 20s multiple. We think AI is going to lead to faster clinical trials and ultimately more drug discovery.

39:57So it's a great example of something that is perceived as a loser or has been perceived as a loser, but really is going to be a lot closer to a winner. So it's almost the exact opposite of the narrative that gets thrown around. And, Bobby, just be honest. Did you say Sasspocalypse? Because before the break I said nobody knows what that means, and then you knew what it meant, so you said it. Trying to look smart. Well, you don't have to look smart. You are smart. You have Salesforce, your top pick. You've done great. You're up 20 % in three months. You're going to probably outperform everybody.

40:26Bobby Beric, thank you. We're excited about it. Thanks for having me. All right, there we go. All right, coming up, even more earnings action. You got the gap, the clothing retailer, searching. Why? It's up 16.5%. We'll tell you right after this.

40:47All right, welcome back. We've got an earnings alert on Gap. Shares are up 16%. This despite an apparent miss on revenue, but they did beat on EPS. The Gap announcing a new CEO for Old Navy, not the whole company, just Old Navy, and said the company continues to see a, quote, resilient but discerning consumer. It's after a mixed bag from the dollar source. This is really interesting, guys. Dollar General closed up over 2 percent after an earnings beat. They raised their outlook. On the other side of it, Dollar Tree delivered a softer-than-expected outlook, and that stock, Tim, dropped 4 percent.

41:23I mean, I know we're not supposed to kind of lump them together, but we kind of lump them together most of the time. Well, yeah, I think it's a slightly different format, I realize, within the same format. I want to get back to Gap. Part of the reason here is it's all about their operating margin. I mean, they grew 7.1%. No one was expecting that. Old Navy was weaker. Apparently, Guy wasn't buying enough of those long, baggy denim shorts. But I think if you look at the comps at the Gap, they're up over 10%. And this is kind of the story. So this is also a stock that looked like it was starting to kind of break out.

41:56I mean, the chart tells you it was putting in a bit of a bottom. This is the kind of a number on the margin side, which is what people wanted to see. I wasn't able to buy them because Tim got in before me and hoarded them all. I'm just throwing that out, number one. Number two, it becomes sort of a valuation story. Dollar Gen, I think, and this is just my opinion, I think it's cheaper than Dollar Tree. And I think it's probably, if you look at the numbers and look at the metrics in terms of growth and comps, it's a better company. So I think, you know, the names sound familiar. The companies are entirely different, Brian.

42:29All right. More fast money. No jorts in two minutes.

42:40All right. We've got a news alert happening right now on Gilead. Annika Kim Constantino, what's going on? Hey, Brian. The FDA just approved Bix Lenvo, Gilead's one steely pill designed to simplify treatment for some people living with HIV. The drug is aimed at patients whose HIV is already under control, but who can't use existing single pill regimens and need to take multiple pills a day because of side effects or their HIV resisting certain drugs. We don't have specific revenue estimates for this product, but there is a clear market with Gilead estimating that patients could account for at least 5 % of the more than 1 million people living in the U.S.

43:15with HIV. So this could be an important option for long-term HIV survivors who have exhausted multiple treatments and want a regimen that can control the virus while also simplifying their care, Brian. All right, Annika, thank you very much. All right, now let's move on to McDonald's. McDonald's down 2.5%, third straight day of loss, now trading at its lowest level since July of 2024. Guy Dami, you flagged this for us. How come? I don't want to make a huge deal yet, but think about how quickly McDonald's has gone from an all-time high made earlier this year to almost a multi-year low, which is where we're currently trading.

43:49You don't see that at a company of this size. It's still a$200 billion company or maybe just shy. What does it speak to? Well, you would imagine, given the state of the economy, and we talk about this K-shaped economy, which I'm also sure you hate, just like Sasspocalypse, McDonald's wins. They're not winning. Now, I don't know if it's necessarily a McDonald's specific thing, but the health of the consumer and McDonald's, if you think the consumer is healthy, McDonald's is telling an entirely different story right now. Well, talking about McDonald's definitely, I will admit, makes me grimace. Tim Seymour, to you, I think Burger King is eating their lunch.

44:22QSR. Yeah, I mean, grimace. Grimace is a weird dude. Grimace is a weird dude. Anyway. What is he? I don't know. Guy's got a story about eating 14 McDonald's hamburgers, but I will say that I think the unit economics in quick serve and fast food are really difficult right now. This is the conversation we were having about Wendy's last night, which is nowhere near the quality of a name and obviously needed some activist flow. I like McDonald's here. I worry a little bit that this is such a high quality name that the market is telling us a little bit more. I don't know this is an immediate turnaround, even though this is a long term hold.

44:59I just want people, on the radio you can't see this, but Brian just drew a picture. Can you hold that up to the audience, please? Nope. He drew a grimace on his blank piece of paper. It's actually very good. I think grimace might be eggplant. Well, there you go. What is it? Eggplant? It's a vegetable that people sometimes make Parmesan out of. It's hard to cook. Up next, your final trades.

45:31Final trade time. Tim Seymour, kick it off. Brian, thank you for the help the last few days. It's been great. Gold miners are within 8 % or 10 % of an all-time high. But meanwhile, copper miners are now breaking out to all-time highs. So, CopEx, I think you stay in that trade. I think you're just getting going again. Dan? Yeah, Guy just mentioned McDonald's from an all-time high down, what, 25 % or so to a multi-year load. You know what else is doing that? TJ Maxx, it was at an all-time high about a month and a half ago. Here it is down at a 52-week low. I think there's more room to the downside.

46:04Guy? I hope you know how much we love you, adore you. I mean, seeing some of the Twitter commentary, the fan base loves you as well. I could recite something, but there's not enough time left in the show. So I'm just going to say the following, Brian. Cleveland Cliffs. That comes out CLF. Iron Orc. That's an inside joke from the CEO. I love you. Why do you think you're watching Fast Money? Mad Money, big show with Jim coming up right now.

46:56and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer. Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more. All curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. And no sifting to find exactly what you need, so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly. Learn more at schwapp.com slash trading.

From the publisher

Listen to our traders take you behind the money...how to play the volatility...pops and drops and the movers you missed. 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 870 episodes
Fast Money 8/27/26CNBC's "Fast Money" · 43 min
Listen in VO