The Great Budget Betrayal: Ex-Chancellors Unpack Labour’s £70B Tax Grab and “Madness” Manifesto

1 Dec 2025 · 40 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Emergency post-budget interview where ex-Chancellors Jeremy Hunt and Kwasi Kwarteng argue Labour’s budget sacrifices growth, relies on many tax rises (about £70B total), and includes “madness” policies affecting welfare and property. They also discuss reported OBR pre-budget leak and chaotic government messaging.

Guests (backgrounds)

Jeremy Hunt, UK Conservative MP and former Chancellor of the Exchequer; Kwasi Kwarteng, UK Conservative MP and former Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Key claims

Labour is “betraying” pro-business philosophy; tax rises are “relentless” (43 measures) because income tax/VAT/NI on employees weren’t raised; welfare spending and benefit rules are unsustainable; property “mansion tax” and renter/landlord regulation will cascade into lower house prices; fiscal drag and frozen thresholds will later raise effective rates; Reeves may be a “fall guy” rather than fully autonomous.

Notable examples

scrapping the two-child benefit cap (~£3B); welfare reforms not passed (~£5B); pension “salary sacrifice” cap cut from £20,000 to £2,000; council tax bans for expensive homes; cash ISA reduction; OBR verdict leak “about an hour before” the budget.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Initial Reactions to Labour's Budget

1:48 to 3:10

Ex-chancellors share their feelings of betrayal regarding Labour's budget decisions.

“If you tax people enough, they will leave.”

Economic Fundamentals in the UK

3:10 to 4:32

Discussion on the UK's economic strengths and the need for growth.

“And so I was looking for some, you know, big efforts to unlock growth.”

Concerns About Labour's Approach

4:32 to 6:24

Concerns regarding Labour's focus on welfare and its impact on economic growth.

“universities in the world, three of the world's top 10.”

Taxation and Socialist Policies

6:24 to 7:40

Ex-chancellors discuss the socialist tendencies of Labour's current policies.

“I mean, we can talk about the rights and wrongs of it, but it's unpopular in the country.”

Welfare and Economic Viability

7:40 to 8:28

Debate about the sustainability of welfare spending in relation to the economy.

“I think in 88 In 90 to 91 and Ed Ball said this today on GMB which I was on only 2 % of people paid the 40 % rate And now, of course, it's something like 25, nearly 30%.”

Critique of New Tax Measures

8:28 to 12:54

Criticism of new taxation measures and their potential negative economic impact.

“You know, I looked at the polls this morning.”

Budget Leak Controversy

12:54 to 14:00

Discussion on the chaos surrounding the budget leaks and their implications.

“So the one that was done like an hour before the budget was someone in the Office for Budget Responsibility who put up the OBR's verdict on the budget before the budget itself.”

The Chaos of Budget Leaks

14:00 to 15:10

Discussion on the chaotic nature of recent budget leaks and their global implications.

“At one stage, they thought they were going to raise income tax, and they were trying to soften us up for that.”

Rachel Reeves' Position and Qualifications

15:10 to 17:20

Analyzing Rachel Reeves' qualifications and the influence of broader political forces on her actions.

“And what surprised me was, if that happens, the head of the OBR would be like, what the, you know, this is terrible, they'd be flustered.”

Labour's Tax Increases Explained

17:20 to 20:34

Overview of Labour's significant tax increases and their implications on public spending and welfare.

“They put Torsten Bell, who, I mean, he's the mansion tax guru.”
Show all 20 chapters

Political Blame and Economic Planning

20:34 to 23:13

Discussion on Rachel Reeves' political strategies and the need for a clear economic plan.

“So the entire income tax increase in terms of freezing the threshold is going to welfare essentially.”

Growth Strategies and Budget Specifics

23:13 to 24:24

Exploration of proposed strategies for economic growth and insights on the recent budget.

“he was also cutting public spending by 19 % in real terms.”

Pension Changes and Investment Incentives

24:24 to 26:58

Discussion on recent pension policy changes and the impact on investment incentives.

“Okay, so let's go back to the specifics of the budget.”

Fiscal Drag and Tax Thresholds

26:58 to 28:00

Analysis of fiscal drag effects and the implications of frozen tax thresholds over time.

“And so that was one of the things that I don't think I fully agreed with it.”

Tax Thresholds and Economic Pressure

28:00 to 29:15

Learn how frozen tax thresholds affect the economy and property market.

“So you get to a point where, you know, 40 % being paid at 50 grand a year is totally not what was envisaged back in the late 80s.”

Labour's Tax Strategy and Union Influence

29:16 to 31:08

Explore Labour's tax increases and the challenges in reducing spending.

“I think the property market is under a lot of pressure.”

The Inefficiency of Government Spending

31:09 to 33:18

Understand the implications of high government spending on economic growth.

“conservatives have a higher tolerance for strikes if there are disagreements on what's fair.”

The Inefficiency of Government Spending

33:34 to 34:19

Understand the implications of high government spending on economic growth.

“that your pension is not safe and secure and they're coming for your inheritance.”

Addressing Economic Growth Challenges

34:49 to 38:14

Discuss strategies for improving economic productivity and managing benefits.

“So I think we've got to, as a country, I keep coming back to this.”

The Nature of Political Discourse

38:15 to 39:39

Examine the dynamics of personal exchanges in British politics.

“Well, some people have criticized it because it was quite a personal exchange.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Kwasi Kwarteng:And on the subject of money, today's sponsor could potentially help you find money you didn't even know you were owed. The FCA recently confirmed that millions of car finance agreements between 2007 and 2021 were missold due to hidden commission deals. An estimated$8.2 billion is owed back to around 14 million UK drivers and refund club by helping people check if they're one of them. Now, you could do this yourself. Track down every finance agreement, contact each lender, manage the whole ongoing process, or you could give Refund Club 60 seconds by clicking the link in the description below and entering your name, your date of birth and your address.

0:42Kwasi Kwarteng:They pull your agreements, they check the lenders and they pass anything valid to their in-house law firm. They only get paid if they win you a claim and only after the money hits your account. With the average successful claim around£829 per agreement, it stacks up fast. They cover all the major UK lenders. So if you've financed a car through pretty much any high street name, you're probably covered. If you're anything like me, you're busy and don't have time for all this stuff. So let Refund Club take care of it for you. Click the link in the description to fill in the free check. It takes literally 60 seconds.

1:21Kwasi Kwarteng:This is an emergency post-budget exclusive broadcast with two ex-chancellors of the UK, Jeremy Hunt and Kwasi Kwarteng. In their only media interviews exclusively for disruptors, following the budget, we unpack Labour's policy U-turns and the controversy surrounding the reported OBR pre-budget leak. I think some of them are intentional and some of them are accidental. That to me is serious. Nothing is held back and these truths are brutal. Growth was completely sacrificed. If you tax people enough, they will leave. Do you think Rachel Reeves is qualified to be the UK Chancellor? In all candour.

1:58Kwasi Kwarteng:But first, let me know in the comments what you think about Labour's budget plans. And now, here are not one, but two ex-UK Chancellor's unfiltered thoughts. Jeremy, what shocked you the most about the budget? I think that I felt a bit betrayed, actually, because obviously I'm a conservative and, you know, I've got skin in the game as a former chancellor. But I was really giving Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer the benefit of the doubt on an individual level. I think they're both decent people and, you know, different political traditions. But I really did think that we would have a party that, yes, they were never going to agree with me on the need to bring taxes down.

2:43Kwasi Kwarteng:But I thought the basic philosophy was going to be pro-business. And I think yesterday, very sadly, you know, growth was completely sacrificed to the internal Labour Party debate about welfare spend. And I think it's going to make it much harder to get out of our low growth trap. So I was pretty disappointed, actually. What made you think that Labour would be pro-business? um look by the way i'm going to try and say some cheerful things uh you know it's uh i don't want this to be like uh you know a morgue um after the after the budget but you know i absolutely believed rachel reeves when she told everyone that she wasn't going to put taxes up on working people and that you know she said countless times that you can't run the economy just by asking people to pay more tax.

3:39Kwasi Kwarteng:It has to come from growth. And so I was looking for some, you know, big efforts to unlock growth. And, you know, here's my first positive thing. You know, the fundamentals for the UK economy are fantastic. I mean, we talked about this last time, but my kids are 11, 13 and 15. If I was going to choose a big European country for them to be born in, I would definitely choose the UK. You can find smaller European countries that really got their act together like Switzerland or Denmark. And economists say that there is sometimes special factors which make it easier for countries of, you know, three to five million population to do really well.

4:24Kwasi Kwarteng:But if you're looking at the big countries, I mean, what we've got are the things that ought to really make us successful. I mean, we've got outside the US, the most respected universities in the world, three of the world's top 10. We've got the third largest tech sector in the world after the United States and China. And this is the century of AI. And so what you've got as well is, you know, all our universities now, starting with Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial, this sort of triangle, but actually spreading well beyond those. They've all got these amazing campuses with business parks, science parks, tech parks, spin outs galore.

5:03So there's some

5:04Kwasi Kwarteng:brilliant things happening here. I heard recently, I wasn't able to verify it, but someone said to me that if you look at the top 100 quantum companies in the world, three quarters of them are in the UK. So if that's true, that is really, really impressive. So the fundamentals are great. It's just we do need to deal with some of the structural problems that have been holding us back. Do you think Labour are starting to break down those fundamentals? I'm worried that we're going to have a period of prolonged stagnation. And, you know, I've been in politics for long enough to know that when you're under pressure, when you get into the bunker in politics, you start giving up on the idea of winning over new hearts and minds and just playing to your base.

5:53Kwasi Kwarteng:You start thinking, if only I can get the people who voted Labour last time to vote Labour next time, then we might get through the next election. and I'm not going to bother to win the argument with everyone else because they're obviously going to vote against us. You know, that was part of our mentality in the final part of the Conservative administration. We've kind of given up thinking we'd be persuaded floating voters and we just wanted to make sure that our core voters came home. And I feel Labour's already got into that position. I mean, you know, this£3 billion for getting rid of the two-child cap.

6:30Kwasi Kwarteng:I mean, we can talk about the rights and wrongs of it, but it's unpopular in the country. The country do not agree that we should say to people on benefits, you don't have to face the same trade-offs about how many children you have that everyone else has to face. And the country don't agree with lifting that cap. But obviously Labour MPs, the Labour Party faithful do. And sure enough, you know, they were thrown a bone. Kwasi, what shocked you the most about the budget?

6:57Jeremy Hunt:Very good question. I mean, I think that the relentless tax rises, but the tax rises were all, I think there were 43 separate measures. Wow. Because what they've done is they committed not to raising income tax, VAT, or national insurance on employees. And they couldn't raise any of them because they would contradict the manifesto. And I think Reeves wanted to do that, hence the sort of press conference three weeks ago. But because they couldn't do that, they went through this sort of what I call an itsy-bitsy approach. But all those measures were raising tax and what was the worst one do you think so I think the the mansion tax will arguably be the most The most regressive well the most the most forbidding because if you look at the top rate 40 % was introduced I think in 88 In 90 to 91 and Ed Ball said this today on GMB which I was on only 2 % of people paid the 40 % rate And now, of course, it's something like 25, nearly 30%.

7:59Jeremy Hunt:So you can live in a world where, you know, 2 million sounds incredibly valuable house. But, you know, you know, as well as I do, in 15 years' time, you know, a two-bedroom flat in Neasden will be paying the mansion tax, or the equivalent thereof. And that's what I think is a big problem.

8:15Kwasi Kwarteng:Right. So just how socialist do you think Labour are?

8:18Jeremy Hunt:So this is a very interesting question. I think in her bones, Rachel Reeves is not a socialist. Well, she's a social Democrat. She's not a full left. But it's obvious to me that they're being pulled to the left because of the political dynamics. You know, I looked at the polls this morning. Reformer, what, 28 % roughly. Labour on about 19%. The Greens are on 17, 16, 17%. So you can see a world where the left is totally fractured. You've got left wing Labour MPs. You've got Zach Polanski, the hypnotist. so he calls himself well you know about that you've got you've got he's our next he's the real man you've got you've got you know various Islamist parties or leaning parties the left is totally fractured and in order to have a chance of winning or getting back into power I think they've made the decision that they've got to go left they've got to corral as much of that left wing right behind them actually to win office and I think that's the game they're playing so they're being pulled to the left even though some of their instincts aren't that left-leaning.

9:24Jeremy Hunt:I'll give you an example. Beginning of the year, they said they were not going to lift the cap on two children, the welfare cap. Rachel Reeves was very adamant about that. We can't afford it. And of course, yesterday, that's exactly what they did. And if you looked at the House of Commons when she announced that, that got the biggest cheer from Labour MPs. You know, they were waving the order paper. We do that much better, actually, the waving of the order. But anyway, they did a version of it. And I was surprised. I was surprised at how enthusiastically they received they welcome that

9:55Kwasi Kwarteng:Do you think we're paying too much welfare in the UK right now?

9:58Jeremy Hunt:Oh, definitely. I mean, it's clear to me that And that's one, you know, people talk about the mini budget. That was where we went wrong We should we should be cutting or not cutting spending. I mean for mathematicians who should be sorting the first order So the raise of expenditure the increase in expenditure should be should be much lower that increase than it is today. You're growing the economy at, what, 1%, 1.5 %? And the welfare bill is going up, what, 4 %? The maths doesn't work. Wow.

10:27Kwasi Kwarteng:So does it feel like in the UK, you're rewarded for not working and penalised for working?

10:34Jeremy Hunt:Yeah, basically. I mean, the problem with the situation we're in, and it's a Western problem, is that we've got welfare states that were created, you know, after the Second World War, 80 years ago. Totally different demographic, totally different dynamics. And we're funding that welfare state where we have a lot less money, a lot less growth. And frankly, there's a lot more immigration than there ever has been. So if you think you're earning less money, but you're creating a welfare state which you have to pay for, and you simply don't have the means to raise revenue through growth, to pay for the public services and the welfare.

11:11Kwasi Kwarteng:What one thing that Labour changed at the budget that you thought maybe that's the most destructive? The one that most worried me, I think it was most economically illiterate, was the extra bans of council tax on more expensive homes. Now, you know, this is not, by the way, a sort of traditional Tory wanting to protect his wealthy friends. I'm very happy with wealthier people paying more tax. I think overall, everyone is paying too much now. and we need to start bringing it down as I started to do. But you will remember, and I was not popular for this, but in the 2022 autumn statement, I reduced the threshold that you pay the 45p rate from 150 ,000 to 125 ,000.

12:01Kwasi Kwarteng:So a lot of people didn't like that. I'm just saying that because the principle that when times are tough, we should ask wealthier people to pay their fair share, I have no problem with. But this is madness because the one thing that could happen in the next year that would get the economy motoring is the property market starting to take off as interest rates come down. As we know, inflation has nearly doubled in the last year, and that's meant that interest rates have stayed higher than they would otherwise have been. But there is now the prospects that they would start to come down and people start to buy properties.

12:40Kwasi Kwarteng:but with this measure which is not going to take effect for another three years but it it is going to gum up the top end of the property market which will have an impact on the rest of the property market as well and it's only going to raise 400 million pounds which in treasury terms is absolutely nothing but it is going to be another signal that you know this country is not backing enterprise and successful people and and I just think it's a really big miscalculation so a few hours before the budget there was a leak was that an accident or was that not an accident um well god it's been very chaotic and um I think some of them are intentional and some of them are accidental.

13:32Kwasi Kwarteng:So the one that was done like an hour before the budget was someone in the Office for Budget Responsibility who put up the OBR's verdict on the budget before the budget itself. And I think that was an accident, but they're doing an inquiry. I don't think that was malicious, Who knows? And then there were lots of leaks from the government trying to soften us up. At one stage, they thought they were going to raise income tax, and they were trying to soften us up for that. Those were obviously deliberate. But then at this time, what was different is there were lots of unplanned leaks. So when they changed their mind and decided they weren't going to charge us to raise income tax, that got out there immediately.

14:19Kwasi Kwarteng:And it was very chaotic. and for some reason it's gone very badly wrong on this budget. And my only point is, you know, party politics aside, we must sort this out because there is something that is a bit different about the UK, which is that because the whole world speaks English and, you know, the BBC is on TV in Singapore and, you know, people in Tokyo and New York read the Financial Times and The Economist. When you have this kind of chaos, the whole world knows. Now you could have this chaos in the run-up to the German budget or the French budget and Probably no one outside France or Germany would ever really know about it, but they know about it when it happens to us And uh, and it's not good for our global reputation.

15:07Kwasi Kwarteng:And so Um, so I think we need to sort it out.

15:10Jeremy Hunt:I think it's a convenient thing to have happened Because if you remember the mini budget we kept it all to ourselves and then we we announced it I announced it and the markets puked because they didn't know what was happening yeah so ever ever since then the treasury has just leaked everything they've leaked everything i think i was but yeah they're reacting against me um and and and and and i think there is a you know they said oh the markets didn't move at all of course they didn't they they'd read they knew exactly what was going to be in it yeah and when the obr did it that that was like belt and braces okay we've leaked everything and now we're really going to leak everything and oops oh my god it's on the website.

15:52Jeremy Hunt:And what surprised me was, if that happens, the head of the OBR would be like, what the, you know, this is terrible, they'd be flustered. But he immediately said, Oh, no, it's a terrible mistake, we're going to get to the bottom of it. Do you what I mean? It was so, it was so sort of slick his, his apology. I thought, Hmm, that's interesting. And these are just my own thoughts. But I think that it was convenient for the government for it to come out in that way. That's what I think. Doesn't mean they did it deliberately, but it was not the worst thing as far as they were concerned. That's what I actually think.

16:27Kwasi Kwarteng:Do you think Rachel Reeves is qualified to be the UK Chancellor?

16:31Jeremy Hunt:Well, look, I mean, who's qualified? I think Rachel, so having been there, I actually feel sorry for her. And I said that people say, really? And I, you know, the idea that there's some magical Labour Chancellor waiting in the wings, they would do exactly what she's doing. They would do exactly what she's doing. So, So, you know, whether it's Rachel from accounts or whatever you want to call her, or Wes Streeting or Angela Raining or any of these people, the idea that they're going to do different things is completely for the birds. Whoever is in this Labour government doing that job would have done exactly what she's done.

17:04Kwasi Kwarteng:So she's not really pulling any strings?

17:06Jeremy Hunt:I don't, I mean, I don't think she, I think she's potentially a fall guy. But, you know, if you look to the news over the summer, It was all about how number 10 had appointed Minouche Shafiq, who ran Columbia University. She's in the economic team. They put Torsten Bell, who, I mean, he's the mansion tax guru. He used to run a think tank. They put him in the treasury. The Labour backbenchers are cracking the whip as well. They didn't do welfare, the welfare reforms. You've got the OBR. So the idea that this lady who's sitting in number 11 has full autonomy is for the birds. There's a whole bunch of other interests that are driving this thing.

17:49Jeremy Hunt:So is she qualified? She lied about her CV, which I think is terrible. How does she keep her job then? Yeah, so the serious thing, you know, when she said she'd done 10 years at the Bank of England and she'd done six, and then she said she was an economist at HBOS and she was some sort of bank official, that to me is serious because actually a lot of people in the private sector would have been fired for a lot less. That I am worried about. There's a habit, I think, there. But, you know, would anyone else in that party do anything differently? I don't think so.

18:27Kwasi Kwarteng:So apparently Labour have now raised taxes by about$70 billion.

18:31Jeremy Hunt:Yeah, about that. So look, what happened? In two years. Well, barely. In 18 months, actually. They got in. So rewind the clock. And it's incredible how much has happened in a relatively short time The election was on the 4th of July and well. Yeah, it was the 4th of July Independence Day 4th of July 2024 that isn't that long ago. It's about what 16 months So they get in in July They say oh we've the evil Tories left us with a 22 billion black hole Half of that was that was the trade union deal because if you remember they whacked up train drivers pay They did a deal with nurses. They did a deal with doctors.

19:08Jeremy Hunt:So half of the 22 billion black hole was the public sector deal The pay deals that they did so it was 22 billion. We can test the figure but give them the 22 billion Then in November last year they raised taxes. I remember opening up the times 35 billion increase It wasn't 35 billion. It was 40 billion. They raised 40 billion in taxes last year and and 25 billion of that you know, 5, 8, 60 % was all on national insurance for employers. People like you, Rob. You know, you collectively paid 25 billion of that 40 billion. And she said at the time, you know, the evil Tories left such a mess. This is a stabilizing budget.

19:50Jeremy Hunt:I won't come back for more. She pretty much said that. This is a one-off 40 billion raise. And of course, yesterday, What was it 26 billion? Some people say it's towards 30 looking at the fine print So as you say you're right, it's at least 66 maybe up to 70 billion in two budgets And that's a huge amount of money and a lot of that is going to deal with with welfare so 26 billion if you look at the thrash thresholds, I think it's roughly about 8 billion and And the eight breaks down beautifully. Three billion is scrapping the cap on two child, the benefits for two children so that you can have more.

20:30Jeremy Hunt:If you have more children, you get benefits, that's three billion. And five billion was the welfare reform that they didn't get through. So the entire income tax increase in terms of freezing the threshold is going to welfare essentially.

20:45Kwasi Kwarteng:How does that make you feel?

20:47Jeremy Hunt:I'm concerned because I think, actually my biggest fear is that they get back in. And it won't be the Labour Party. It'll be a coalition of the left. Labour, the Greens, maybe a bit of Lib Dem in there. SMP, Plaid might have four or five, who knows. That's my biggest fear. Because then you'll get a much more left-wing government than if you can imagine it, you have today. That's my biggest fear. But we've got to just accept the fact they're going to be running the country for the other three years. My real fear also is that in that time, we've looked at their first two budgets, they've raised£40 billion the first time, they raised£26 billion in tax this year.

Read the full transcript

21:29Jeremy Hunt:They've got another three years of budgets. And do I think they're suddenly going to balance the books and not raise taxes? No, I don't. I think they're going to raise taxes every single year they're in. And that frightens me. And what do you think of Rachel Reeves

21:43Kwasi Kwarteng:continuing to blame the Conservatives for all the mess that we're in right now? because she did it at the budget again, the conservative legacy. Part of the reason she's doing it is because George Osborne very successfully pinned on Labour in 2010 the fact that the previous Labour government had run out of money and he used phrases like they didn't fix the roof while the sun was shining and he kind of won that argument with the British people and then Conservatives were re-elected in 2015. So I think that what Rachel Reeves is trying to do is a repeat of that. And, you know, there was politics in what George Osborne was doing, and in some ways he was right, but in some ways he was wrong.

22:34Kwasi Kwarteng:I mean, Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown actually did a very good job in the financial crisis. I mean, they marshaled finance ministers around the world to inject liquidity into the global economy, to stop banks going bust, which would have, you know, bankrupted all our economies. Very, very difficult times. And in that crisis, they didn't do a bad job at all. And, you know, I think they obviously made other mistakes. But so there's an element of politics in all of this. But what I would say to Rachel is, you know, you can do your political thing. But, you know, you've got to have a plan to go with it.

23:12Kwasi Kwarteng:and as George Osborne was presenting that narrative, he was also cutting public spending by 19 % in real terms. I mean, much bigger cuts than Margaret Thatcher ever did. And so he was taking very brave decisions and that's what I'm not really seeing from the government. I'd like to know what the plan is. Yesterday I was really hoping we would see what their plan is for economic growth. I get that they don't want cutting taxes to be part of it, but there's lots of other things you can do planning reform for example you know welfare reform um you know public sector productivity there are you know there are lots and lots of things you know the nhs 10 of the economy what that actually means is that if you improved uh nhs productivity growth to two percent a year which is long-term rate in the private sector It actually has an impact on our actual GDP numbers because it's 10 % of the economy.

24:12Kwasi Kwarteng:It actually adds, you know, 0.1, 0.2 % annual GDP growth. And that's in the direct control of the government. So that's why I think that's what you really need is a plan. Okay, so let's go back to the specifics of the budget. Anything else that stood out for you?

24:28Jeremy Hunt:So I think the pension grab was extraordinary. So that was, you know, they call it the sacrifice, the self-sacrifice it's the salary sacrifice so essentially if you're earning money you can save up to 20 ,000 pounds or you used to be able to save up to 20 ,000 pounds for your pension a year which would be protected from essentially national insurance on employees they've cut that cap from 20 ,000 to 2 ,000 so 18 grand that you of what you were saving every year of the 20 can now be taxed that's that's that's big and actually I think it's a disincentive to saving, providing for your pension. That's, I think, a terrible signal on top of the property tax.

25:13Jeremy Hunt:And the other thing that isn't being picked up about the property tax is that that will, I mean, you guys are property people. You understand property. That will have a cascading effect on property prices. You mean the mansion tax? The mansion tax. So, you know, if a house that was worth, I don't know, 2.1 million sells for 1.8, that has a cascading effect on all the houses that up to that price price point the idea that you know you're sitting in your six hundred thousand five hundred thousand pound house and it's gonna go up in value when you've got essentially a cap you know you've got a mansion tax at two million that's not gonna happen you're not gonna see the gains that you might have seen before so it's got a cascading effect which will impact in a negative way people's net worth hmm so

25:55Kwasi Kwarteng:one thing that I was slightly in support of actually I don't often say I support local policies. But I did like the idea of incentivising investing. I think that not enough investing is taught in school. I think a lot of people think that saving is investing, which I don't, which it isn't. So she reduced the cash ISA in the guise that well, then that encourages investing, but then she didn't increase the stocks and shares or the investing ISA. So she took it off us to say, go and invest it, but she didn't give us a benefit anywhere else. So actually she just took away.

26:30Jeremy Hunt:So what she would argue, and I kind of understand this to an extent, if you're saving£20 ,000, that's your limit, and you could put it all in cash. And she's saying, well, actually, we're going to cap the amount of cash you put in to£12 ,000. And the assumption is that the£8 ,000 will then go into the stock market. And many of you here will know the stock market, it's doing okay, but there aren't enough listings, there isn't enough activity really in it. And so that was one of the things that I don't think I fully agreed with it. Because obviously, if you want to save 20 grand, you should be able to save it in whichever way you want.

27:08Jeremy Hunt:But I understand the fact that, you know, they want to encourage investment in shares and stocks.

27:15Kwasi Kwarteng:And what do you think of all this fiscal drag and this?

27:18Jeremy Hunt:That's horrific. I mean, that is, and we did it. And I try, you know, we try to stop that. But the fiscal drag, and this is why I refer to the mansion tax, because exactly the same thing will happen. The way in which officials work, the Treasury works. And I just saw a man this morning goes, oh, thank God, I'm so pleased. You know, I was so worried the mansion tax, I thought I was going to have to pay 50 grand a year. And I'm like, they never do that. They always introduce it little by little. It's like the boiling frog. You don't just drop the frog in a boiling vat of water. It'll jump straight out.

27:51Jeremy Hunt:You just slowly ratchet up the heat. So they brought it in. They've said it's going to be at 2 million It's going to be a flat rate at two and a half thousand Which is actually half a percent of the difference between one and a half million that was the Proposal that was set put to me when I was there was we were gonna have a half a percent over one and a half million So it's kind of similar Anyway That's where it starts and as you look at the thresholds They've been frozen for years. We froze them. So you get to a point where, you know, 40 % being paid at 50 grand a year is totally not what was envisaged back in the late 80s.

28:32Jeremy Hunt:Because obviously 50 grand a year, I remember, was a hell of a lot of money or 40 grand a year was a hell of a lot of money to be earning. So it comes in at a level where you think it's nothing to do with me. It's just rich people. But then they just freeze the threshold. And then they'll increase the rate. So they'll freeze the threshold at 2 million for God knows how long, if they get back in, that is. And then they can say, actually, 2.5, we'll just put that up to 4 ,000. We'll double it. And that's where you get the real revenue. So it starts off in a kind of mild, moderate way. And then once you've got the lever, you can then dial up the pressure.

29:13Jeremy Hunt:And that's typically what happens. What do you think about the Renters' Rights Act and what will that do to the property market? I think the property market is under a lot of pressure. I think the mansion tax will have a cascading effect. You know, if you're paying extra to buy a£2 million house, you're incentivised to bid under£2 million for the house. And if you're paying£1.9 million, that will have a cascading effect on house prices beneath that price point. That's just logic to me. So that's a big pressure. I think the rights of the renters also is discouraging residential property. And a friend of mine who's made a lot of money in residential property just doesn't do it anymore because of the regs, because of the tax.

30:06Jeremy Hunt:and people can make money in it in the right parts of the country, but it's under pressure. So the whole Labour, and they probably like this, but I think it does put pressure on property downwards. But their problem is housing and the big shortage,

30:22Kwasi Kwarteng:and yet they're making the one type of person who helps them, the landlord, the enemy. It doesn't make any sense to them. Yeah, it doesn't make sense.

30:28Jeremy Hunt:And it only makes sense if you're going to flood the market with new houses, which they're not doing.

30:32Kwasi Kwarteng:I understand now that Labour have increased taxes since they've been in power by 70 billion. Does that sound about right to you? Yeah, it's just, I think it might be 66, but that sort of number, yes. Why are they not looking at reducing their spending?

30:54Kwasi Kwarteng:Well, the reason they're not looking at doing it is because they find it very hard, not least because the unions are a very big part of the labor movement. So when it comes to public sector pay awards, conservatives have a higher tolerance for strikes if there are disagreements on what's fair. And that's not necessarily a good thing because you saw we had lots of strikes under the previous conservative government and they were very disruptive and painful. But we were prepared to take on the unions when we thought their demands were unreasonable, and Labour is less willing to do that. So that's probably the reason.

31:34The other thing is, which I think is a real mistake,

31:38Kwasi Kwarteng:is that Labour are trying to hold up this word austerity, which they've turned into a kind of totally negative thing. Whereas, having run my own business, I think you should always be looking to spend money more efficiently and to cut costs where you can. and even more so if you're in charge of the state, which is spending a trillion pounds of taxpayers' money. But they've kind of turned any kind of demand for more efficiency into a kind of dirty word. So that's why they're doing it. But the mistake here is that if you look around the world, there are parts of the world that are doing really well.

32:20Kwasi Kwarteng:And it's North America, it's Asia, It's, you know, even places like China. And what do they all have in common compared to Europe, which is in this, you know, slow lane of economic growth? They all have lower tax rates. And there are, you know, economists will tell you that one of the reasons for that is that if the state spends too much, it stops the private sector growing. It crowds out private sector investment. By the way, the Office for Budget Responsibility also agree with that because they factored in less investment by the private sector as taxes go up. But I think as business people, and I'm guessing there's quite a few business people in the audience here, we kind of understand there's something different about it, which is that a dynamic economy needs animal spirits.

33:13Kwasi Kwarteng:It needs people who will go out there and take risks, as you've done, Rob, as I've done, as I'm sure people in this room have done. So we're going to start our own business. We're going to be brave. and one of the things that makes you hesitate is if the rewards aren't worth the effort and that's the problem with when taxes get too high. This recent budget should warn you that your pension is not safe and secure and they're coming for your inheritance. Do you even know how much is in your pension or where your pension is invested? Add to this the recent inheritance tax grab on your pensions and the risk of a market crash.

33:49Kwasi Kwarteng:You probably didn't know this and I didn't until recently but physical gold can be added to your pension pot. Gold is inheritance tax-free and has grown 700 % in the last 20 years. You probably know from my content, I'm investing heavily in silver and gold and that's why I've partnered with Direct Bullion. Myself and Nigel Farage are brand ambassadors and Direct Bullion can help you with gold to protect and grow your pension. I buy my gold and silver from Direct Bullion and I don't earn any money on any purchases of gold or silver if you buy direct from Direct Bullion. So if you go to robmore.directbullion.com, you can get a great price on your silver and gold, and you can get the pension gold investing guide completely for free.

34:29Kwasi Kwarteng:As you know, I don't do many strategic partnerships. And when I do, I do them with people who are credible, who've been doing it a long time, who invest in things that I invest in too, and gold and silver's going wild. I'm investing heavily in gold and silver, and I recommend you check out robmore.directbullion.com. So what can we do to grow the economy?

34:50Jeremy Hunt:So I think we've got to, as a country, I keep coming back to this. I think they've got to deal with spending. Because what's happening now is that the spending tail, if you want to put it that way, is wagging the dog of national productivity in the economy. And it's all driven by spending. You know, I don't think Rachel Reeves wanted to increase taxes. It's just that, you know, she's got these backbenchers who won't let her reduce spending. And in order to pay for it, she thinks she has to, you know, clobber the rich, in inverted commas. And it's madness. But that's what's driving all of this.

35:26Jeremy Hunt:You know, you've got 4 million people on benefits in this country. There are no sanctions. They don't have to look for work. You've got about 9 million on benefits. But at least 5 million of them have to normally, you know, go out and look for work. 4 million, they just get the benefits willy-nilly. In a country of 70 million, which we are now adult population, I don't know 45 50 million Four million people receiving benefits is a hell of a lot.

35:52Kwasi Kwarteng:Isn't it quite a high percentage of the people who can work? Yeah, it is.

35:55Jeremy Hunt:It's a very high percentage in terms of I did this sort of experiment We just a thought I like thinking in terms of concrete examples. The Chinese army is the largest army in the world They've got a billion and a half people their armies 2 million people Okay, it's the largest army in the world we've got twice as many on benefits with 70 million people.

36:18Jeremy Hunt:It's kind of crazy, okay? I mean, you know, so that, I think it's a real problem. But check those figures. I'm not, the army might be two and a half million, but it's not more than that. The figures vary, but we've got almost twice as many, if not twice as many people as the Chinese army on benefits.

36:35Kwasi Kwarteng:And a fraction. A fraction of the population, that's right.

36:38Jeremy Hunt:And that is the largest army in the world, the largest of any army. Anyway, just ponder that. And that's how this thing has got out of control. And it's tough. It's very hard. And unless people grapple with it. And to be fair to Labour, I mean, I don't like being fair to them. But to be fair, I remember ministers. I mean, I do GMB, Good Morning Britain, every week. And I remember ministers coming on that program saying, this is unsustainable. When they were trying to prepare people for the welfare reforms that were going to save the$5 billion, Darren Jones and others said, this is unsustainable.

37:12Of course, they don't say that now because they've just gone with the flow.

37:16Jeremy Hunt:But they were right to say that we can't sustain this.

37:20Kwasi Kwarteng:So if you were given more time when you were Chancellor, what would you have done?

37:24Jeremy Hunt:So I think where we went wrong, and I've said this to Liz, I've said this to other people, is if you're going to be unpopular, you've got to try and be unpopular doing the right thing. OK, and I think grappling with expense, it's not just about benefits. It's about the whole gamut of government, the waste, all of that. Unless you grapple with that and it's going to be hard. I don't see how you can reform this because the logic of the OBR and all of that is that, you know, you've got a lump of expenditure, which you have to cover and you've got to raise taxes. And we tried to reduce taxes, but the markets were like, well, who's going to pay for all of this stuff?

38:02Jeremy Hunt:That's why they freaked out. And also because we rolled it out very quickly. But I think that unless you actually grapple with expenditure, it's very difficult to see how you get off this roller coaster.

38:13Kwasi Kwarteng:How do you think Kemi did in the budget and her exchange with Rachel Reeves and how the world views that? Well, some people have criticized it because it was quite a personal exchange. She had that exchange where she talked about mansplaining and so on. But, you know, if you sit in the House of Commons week in, week out and listen to the way Keir Starmer dismisses Kemi as being, you know, a complete irrelevance, that is, you know, equally personal in its impact. And I'm afraid that just is British politics and it's part of the style. It's not my style of politics. I try and avoid that kind of exchange in public.

38:59Kwasi Kwarteng:But it's part of the robustness of our democracy. And I'm not sure I would really want any controls that stopped it happening. I think the fact that we have free speech is a good thing and an important thing for the country. and I think I would rather have those kinds of exchanges than what they have in autocracies where everyone is frightened of saying things that upset the leaders because they could get put in prison. So not an easy thing to absolutely get right, but I don't think I would change it. Jeremy, thank you very much. Quasi, thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

40:25Kwasi Kwarteng:This episode was brought to you by Disruptive Media, helping bold entrepreneurs stand out through podcasting, video, and social content. Visit disruptivemedia.co.uk to learn more.

40:49Thank you.

From the publisher

Two former UK Chancellors, Jeremy Hunt and Kwasi Kwarteng, deliver a brutal, unfiltered emergency analysis on Labour’s first two budgets. 

They expose the truth behind the £70 billion tax hike, the controversial welfare policies, and why freezing housing taxes will "gum up" the top end of the market. Discover the shocking reasons this financial chaos is happening now and why the UK's global reputation is taking a hit!

BEST MOMENTS

"I was really giving Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer the benefit of the doubt... I thought the basic philosophy was going to be pro-business. And I think yesterday, very sadly, growth was completely sacrificed."

"The one thing that most worried me... was the extra bands of council tax on more expensive homes... it is going to gum up the top end of the property market."

"They've got another three years of budgets. And do I think they're suddenly going to balance the books and not raise taxes? No, I don't"

Exclusive community & resources:  

For more EXCLUSIVE & unfiltered content to make, manage & multiply more money, join our private online education platform: Money.School →⁠ ⁠⁠https://money.school⁠  

And if you’d like to meet 7 & 8 figure entrepreneurs, & scale to 6, 7 or 8 figures in your business or personal income, join us at our in-person Money Maker Summit Event (including EXCLUSIVE millionaire guests/masterminds sessions)  →⁠ ⁠⁠https://robmoore.live/mms⁠ 

🔗 CONNECT WITH ROB 

📸 Facebook: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/robmooreprogressive/?locale=en_GB⁠ 

📸 Instagram:⁠  ⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/robmooreprogressive/⁠ 

👨‍💻 Linkedin:⁠ ⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/robmoore1979?originalSubdomain=uk⁠ 

🌍 Website: ⁠https://robmoore.com/⁠ 

🎙 A NOTE FOR THE #DISRUPTORS:     

The world is on the edge of a revolution. Wealth, power & information are being disrupted. 

Mainstream media is dying. Your freedom is being challenged. Your money is being debased. #Disruptors & Rob Moore asks the questions others dare not to ask. Disruptive & diverse guests speak out on topical world issues & their areas of success & influence. As the world has changed, Disruptors has evolved to diverse global movers, shakers & change makers who stand out & speak up. 

Want to start your own podcast? Get in touch -  Disruptive Media. ⁠⁠https://disruptivemedia.co.uk/⁠

If you don’t risk anything, you risk everything.

More from Disruptors

All 42 episodes
The Great Budget Betrayal: Ex-Chancellors Unpack Labour’s £70B Tax Grab and “Madness” ManifestoDisruptors · 40 min
Listen in VO