Stores: What Are They Good For?

6 Jun 2025 · 1 h 6 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Fashion People - Episode: Stores: What Are They Good For?

Episode Overview

  • Title: Stores: What Are They Good For?
  • Host: Lauren Sherman
  • Guest: Jonathan Schley, Vice Chairman of Newmark’s Global Retail Advisory
  • Release Schedule: Twice weekly, every Tuesday and Friday

Key Themes and Discussions

Introduction

  • Lauren introduces the podcast and guest Jonathan Schley.
  • Discussion on Lauren's experience at the Global Fashion Summit in Copenhagen focusing on sustainability and corporate values.
  • Importance of real estate in the fashion industry is emphasized.

The Role of Real Estate in Fashion

  • Jonathan explains his role: acting as a real estate partner for various fashion and consumer brands globally.
  • Discussion on how real estate decisions have evolved, particularly with luxury brands.
  • Historically, decisions were made locally, but greater visibility and coherence are now required due to social media's impact.

Changes Over Two Decades

  • Shift from isolated local strategies to cohesive global strategies for brand presence.
  • The importance of visibility and media in shaping consumer perceptions and behaviors.

The Importance of Foot Traffic

  • Foot traffic's current relevance debated; it differs based on brand type.
  • Luxury brands may not rely as heavily on foot traffic for conversions as mass-market brands do.
  • The concept of "dwell time" is introduced as crucial for conversion.

Challenges and Considerations

  • Retail strategies must consider consumer behavior changes and economic conditions.
  • Discussion on the trend toward short-term leases and its implications for brands.
  • Emphasis on the necessity of understanding local markets and trends.

Cultural Impact on Retail Spaces

  • The necessity of creating engaging environments in retail spaces to drive traffic and enhance the shopping experience.
  • Examples such as the success of the Ace Hotel in creating a cultural hub through strategic brand partnerships.

Mixed-Use Developments

  • The rise of mixed-use spaces and their effectiveness in urban retail.
  • Importance of amenities and cultural relevance to attract consumers and keep them engaged.

Future of Luxury Retail

  • Discussion on luxury brands needing to evolve their strategies in response to changing consumer behavior, particularly in markets like China.
  • Brands must ensure they have a compelling value proposition to retain customers.

Conclusion

  • The importance of being proactive and innovative in the face of shifting market dynamics is emphasized.
  • The conversation reflects on how luxury brands can no longer rely on past successes and must adapt to new consumer expectations.

Key Takeaways

  • Real Estate's Influence: Understanding the strategic role of real estate in shaping brand presence and consumer engagement.
  • Consumer Behavior: Acknowledging the changing landscape of consumer preferences and how it affects retail strategies.
  • Cultural Relevance: Emphasizing the need for brands to create meaningful experiences that resonate with consumers.
  • Future Preparedness: The necessity for luxury brands to innovate continuously to stay relevant in a competitive market.

Additional Insights

  • The conversation hints at a potential shift in luxury consumption due to economic factors and changing consumer values.
  • There’s a recognition that while brands must adapt, they also need to retain authenticity and connection to their heritage.

Closing Remarks

  • Jonathan and Lauren conclude the episode, reflecting on the insights shared and the evolving landscape of retail in fashion.

Next Episode Reminder: Tune in for more discussions on current trends in the fashion industry.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Hello and welcome to Fashion People. I'm Lauren Sherman, writer of Puck's fashion and beauty memo line sheet. And today with me on the show is Jonathan Schley, a global retail real estate advisor at Newmark. We're going to chat about stores and what they're good for. Before we get going, I wanted to remind you that if you like this podcast, you'll definitely love Puck, where I send an email called Line Sheet. If you're a fashion person, you get that reference. It's an original look at what's really going on inside the fashion and beauty industries. Line Sheet is scoopy, analytical, and above all, fun.

0:41Along with me, a subscription to Puck gains you access to an unmatched roster of experts reporting on powerful people and companies in entertainment, media, sports, politics, finance, the art world, and much more. If you're interested, listeners of Fashion People get a discount. Just go to puck.news slash fashion people to join Puck or start a free trial.

1:07Happy Friday, everyone. I've spent the week in Copenhagen at the Global Fashion Summit, which is essentially a conference about how to prioritize environmental issues, social issues, corporate governance when you're building a company. They call it ESG. They also call it a lot of other dumb stuff that I'm not going to include. But it was a really interesting conference. I had a truly great time. On Wednesday, I interviewed Veja co-founder Sebastian Kopp on stage at the summit. We mostly talked about why talking about words like sustainability and corporate values have no meaning. I'm going to publish his interview on this feed sooner than later, but the crux of it is a lot of these policies are being walked back because of, as everyone calls it, the administration is at least in the US and it is affecting what's happening globally, but they're not going away entirely.

2:04And people need to think about building socially responsible businesses because there's a lot of money to be made in doing that. So it was really enlightening. I'm glad I joined. I was also out and about in the city. I love it here. So fun, especially for just like two or three days and the sun is shining for most of that time. I've been very lucky. And I've had some incredibly good meals with great people, including dinner at the home of the Ghani co-founders, Nikolai and Dita. And they're just so lovely. And it was a really great night, great conversation with many cool people. Then also lunch with Eileen Fisher and her team.

2:44I also did some channel checks for my line sheet co-author, Sarah Shapiro. I got to go to Pico, the hair accessory and jewelry shop that I learned about through Marie Claire's writer, reporter, editor, Hallie LaSavage. It was very fun. I bought a lot of stuff for all my mom friends. I don't know if it's cool for young people anymore, but I got some scrunchies. I also went to Skull Studio to MF Penn. You can read about my whole shopping scene. You can read my whole shopping scene report in Friday's line sheet, which also has Sarah's dispatch from Madison Avenue. She was in New York City. And finally, for those of you who can't get enough of Dior and Jonathan Anderson, I, as promised, shared a behind-the-scenes report in Thursday's line sheet issue.

3:33But enough about that. Let's get started with another job.

3:41Jonathan Schley, welcome to Fashion People. Thanks for having me back. What's going on, buddy? Not a lot. Just hanging out. What did you have for breakfast this morning? I was dreading this question and thinking deeply about it days in advance, but sadly nothing and just black coffee. I'm not really a breakfast guy. You and I were discussing this previously, but I think there needs to be like a style section story about, or you know who should do it, Amanda Moll at Bloomberg? The end of breakfast. uh you're you're an influencer on the topic it seems these days though because the the impact that the thought in advance had on me was serious yeah well so the thing is when we were growing up all i ever heard was like you need to eat breakfast to get your metabolism going oprah was like eat breakfast you gotta eat you gotta the craziest thing to me in diet culture as someone who's literally never been on a diet is the fact that like they want you to eat so much when you're on a diet they're like you got to eat your protein before the event and after you work out and all this stuff and at some point in my life i was like a i can never follow this shit anyway but b i'm just gonna eat when i'm hungry and that's the end of it and the reality is i'm not hungry in the morning a lot.

5:08I love breakfast food though. I mostly just eat breakfast when it's a meeting. Otherwise it's just coffee and out the door. So anyways. Anyways, onto a more important thing. Sure. So the last time you were on the podcast, we kind of, everyone should listen to Jonathan's episode when we chatted about the news of the day. But we know each other from, We discussed this from me being a reporter, kind of a general interest reporter on the fashion industry and occasionally covering real estate. And you are a person who works in real estate. And as we know, everything in life goes back to real estate, but especially in the fashion and luxury industries.

5:48And I thought it would be interesting to just sort of break down. This is, I mean, there could be a podcast just about retail real estate. I'm sure there is, But I thought it'd be fun to do a bottle episode or whatever you want to call it on how real estate's relationship with the rest of the fashion industry has changed in the last 20 years. You're not that old, but you know a lot about it. Can you, I think, to start, kind of explain what you do? Yeah. So I, along with my partner and team, act as effectively the real estate partner for various fashion and consumer product and design brands, both in North America and globally.

6:36You know, if you're a really massive group, usually you have an in-house real estate team, but probably still work with someone like me, but sort of the activities that you're doing are slightly different. So probably most people associate it, you know, most directly with real estate brokerage, meaning you find a space for someone, they take it. It's that simplistic, but we tend to be significantly more involved at the strategy stage of actually defining, you know, a first to market plan and a local market strategy and penetration and all that sort of stuff. Um, you know, from the brand side, which is predominantly what we do is represent tenants.

7:14Um, however, we also similarly do, uh, uh, similar activities for lack of a better word, um, on the landlord or investor side, as we call it, um, not often, but we represent or work with a few, um, of the more premier exclusive shopping center owners in the country. Um, I hate to use the word consult. I hate when people like fluff up what they do, but it's, you know, yeah. So you usually have an association with, like, if I live in Los Angeles, I often see Schley and your partner, your name on things. You have an association with a firm, but do you work at the firm or do you, like, how does that work?

8:03No, I work at the firm. So we, you know, I, I, I got in my sort of retail real estate entree was really through um my time working with ace hotel on retail brand partnerships so at that time which was when we originally met you know going on more than 10 years ago and i you know that was kind of like the best real estate brand mba i could have ever got in the sense that you know all those things had to function together and really looked at it through this brand partnership lens as opposed to like a transactional lens. Um, so, you know, we did, um, so when we bought the hotel in downtown LA, um, I had a real estate brokerage license in LA from previous activities that I did.

8:52And we had a lot of vacant space around us and they were like, go bring brands to be our neighbors. Right. I had no idea what that job even was as a job at the time and just sort of did it as like hey we're ace hotel we're doing this project confidentially would you come be our neighbor and then out of that spun off my own consultancy which then went into um moved me into working at cbre which is the largest real estate service provider in the world um and then as when we last talked where when we last talked i was still working at and as of then have now moved and now i'm at a company called newmark okay cool so really quickly i think the ace hotel is is a great example of what you do and why i think you have a really specific understanding of the word adjacencies comes up a lot in real estate and also at department stores and things and who should be and i just remember the ace hotel in downtown la this was pre-covid this is what 10 years ago now 13 or 13 okay so it was really early And downtown LA was like the new hope.

10:01People were buying lofts down there. Everything was affordable. And this Ace Hotel, which was a fabulous hotel. I used to stay there when I would come to LA sometimes. You put, there was a really cool art deco building across the street. You put an Acne there. There was an Aesop across the street. By the time you were done, there was all this like cool, these cool shops there. A Dune opened up, which is Dune is like a restaurant in Los Angeles. There was a Verve coffee around the corner and you made the area, which was basically uninhabited or felt like that prior. There's a bookstore a couple blocks down.

10:40You made it feel like it was like a place to be. And there was the Ace, that hotel has an amazing theater. I think, does the hotel operate as something else now? It's not an Ace. I'm not sure what it is. It traded and then, you know, Ace went through some restructuring, I believe. And it's a little different now. And there's something else going on with it right now. But that's for a different podcast. I'm not behind the curtains anymore. I don't know. No. I have no insight. I'm so fascinated by hotel management. But anyway, that is truly for something else. So anyway, you understand, I think you understood very early the importance of like creating a culture at a hotel.

11:25I also remember, and I don't know if you did this one, but at the Ace in London, which was truly one of my favorite places to stay, which is, it's no longer an Ace. There was like a JW Anderson pop-up. That was me. Yeah. And we did like the, and not just like retail. It was very much like that was early days. So it was very much like integrating that into, like you said, the culture of the environment in a particular way. Like we brought in APC to do the blankets and quilts for the hotel and things like that when they were doing those denim quilts. So it was really like, you know, you know, I hate words like curation and stuff like that.

12:08But it was really like, hey, what speaks to the, you know, what's going to what's going to resonate with the consumer in a particular environment? Yeah, that that makes a lot of sense. Okay. So I have found in my career as a reporter that I think it's very obvious that, of course, real estate is a big part of the fashion industry. You need physical spaces to sell things. But also, the two big groups that run the luxury industry, especially LVMH, it is a real estate firm that became something bigger. And so what I wanted to sort of try to break down with you today is how the retail real estate market, and it changes every week.

12:57I feel like I talk to people in your world and one week something's going on and then the next week it's not good, but it's a real bellwether for what's happening in the broader consumer culture, not just fashion. And I guess maybe we can start with how did it work with, and let's focus on luxury brands today because there are so many different dynamics if you start talking about like a czar or something. Sure. How did it work in the 90s and the 2000s with real estate? And how did the development of the conglomerates change the dynamic for luxury real estate over the past 20 years or what have you?

13:51I mean, look, that's a broader real estate reality where I think, you know, my perception on it, and it's no one thing, obviously, but my perception on it is that, you know, real estate and brand strategy as a function of real estate has always historically been a very locally focused effort, right? So you would say LA sat as an island from New York, which sat as an island from Paris, which sat as an island from London because people simply weren't as mobile, right? It was so everything was sort of I think decisions probably like the biggest difference would be decisions were probably made more in isolation back then versus now there's more of a more coherence in terms of the visibility of strategy.

14:37obviously not made in isolation from the perspective of like capital allocation from a group because you would ultimately say we're allocating this much capital and resources to real estate growth. But in terms of the consumer facing visibility, those strategies need to be uniform now, right? And cohesive because, and I think really the biggest factor at play with that is simply media and more specifically social media, right? That we have access, whether it's fashion, whether it's retail, whether it's politics, whether it's entertainment, we have significantly, as the consumer, significantly more visibility into the goings-on day-to-day and what's going on behind the scenes by virtue of the way we communicate media.

15:27So I think that's really like the fundamental difference. And that's fundamentally why our business has been such that we never focused in a singular geography, right? My attitude was always, if we're going to help you in LA, or if we're going to help you in New York, we, you know, we need to be involved in the broader strategy and how all those things tie together, right? So for example, the sort of like aha moment for me on that was really, you know, when we did do that Acne Studios that you referenced and it was a big, you know, it was like the biggest store they'd ever done in the world because obviously downtown was sort of like still a bit of a up and coming area.

16:10So they wanted to make a bigger impact. And then, you know, they had the big Karsten Holler statue inside that they brought in and things like that. And at the time, it was like the first time I'd ever heard this metric be used for anything, but it was the most Instagrammed store in the world in 2013. And that was like a very like, oh, yeah, this is a thing. And then not that I would say we're social media driven. And frankly, I don't like using it as an information source, but its impact was very clear at that point for me in how all of these strategies work together. Right. Yeah. There are just 50 million questions I could ask you, so I'm going to try to structure this as much as I can.

16:56But you mentioned the Instagram thing, stores being Instagramable. Part of that is driving foot traffic. So the best example of that in Los Angeles is the Paul Smith store with the big pink wall. But there are places in every city that are kind of set up for Instagram to drive foot traffic. Foot traffic means something different now than it meant 15 years ago. How important is foot traffic for the success of a brand and how much is it leading to conversion in the way it used to, or is it more just about the exposure? So I think that's brand specific above all else, right? And geography specific above all else.

17:44I would say obviously now more than ever with data and information we can take from people's cell phones and things like that, which is like quite creepy when you look into it in terms of like mass mobile data and things like that, that information can inform decisions. If we're going to focus on luxury, I think the reality is it's less important for luxury brands, right? In terms of, um, its impact for conversion, right? It, because it's just, you know, we talk about this with brands all the time in New York where they'll say, you know, Oh, what about Prince or Kinmare or whatever street versus, you know, the perpendicular street.

18:26And, you know, I'll describe them is like, yeah, you're going to get more visibility on Prince street because there's more traffic, but that's not convertible traffic because that's effectively, you know, the pedestrian equivalent of vehicular traffic. There's streets you go through not to. Right. And so I always think about ultimately conversion is dwell time. And just because there's a lot of bodies passing through doesn't mean that that's going to have any direct effect on dwell time. Always, um, is the simple answer. How much do you feel like you are responsible for finding places that will encourage dwell time?

19:05Like, are you thinking when you're scouting stuff for people, are you looking at, okay, this place is going to be a great retail store for this brand for these reasons and people will stick around? Or is that up to the brand and their architect and all that? We talk about it. It's part of the conversation. At the end of the day, I don't make the decisions, right? Like I'm not writing the check. I'm not spending the money. I'm not allocating the capital. Right. And I don't, you know, I'm very, I tried to not be hyperbolic when I have these conversations with brands. I try to be like, here's the reality.

19:40Here's what we know. Here's what we don't know in the, in, in the corresponding risks. Um, I try to be quite objective to about it. I also think that those conversations shift and change to your point about how the market changes, right? Because whenever things are really hot, everybody's willing to take more risks and be more cool and do something a little edgier and a little experimental. But when stuff seems a little scary, you're a little more protective of your capital and you're going to go more blue chip, right? So sticking to LA as an example, since that's what you referenced, in the pre-COVID, everything was like downtown LA and West Hollywood, right?

20:18Those were like the two biggest requests we got. Then during COVID, everything shifted to local markets where there was a high density of home ownership and wealth. So Pacific Palisades, Silver Lake, Pasadena, et cetera. Now we're starting to see the shift back to the real like blue chip, stable retail areas like Melrose, Melrose Place, Rodeo, right? And I think some of that is on the tailwinds of luxury growth. And some of that is just a reality of the economic environment. Are you seeing a similar pattern in other cities like Miami and New York? New York, for me, I hear so much, we're opening on Madison, we're opening on Madison, we're opening on Madison.

20:57And it feels like when I think of what the last real neighborhoods in Manhattan are, the Upper East Side and the Upper West Side are two of them. Whereas Soho is not really a place people live anymore. Yeah. I mean, Madison is Madison's Madison, right? I think the problem with Madison is on a lease cycle, right? Which is five, 10, 15 years, you know, in most blue chip areas, you're talking a 10 year lease is the average, right? The problem with Madison versus a, like a Melrose place, for example, or a Rodeo, for example, or a bond street for example is it's virtually infinite right so not not like so not not in a massive way but every five to ten years what's main and main changes a little bit right because it shifts with the lease cycle and availability so if a brand wants to come in there's only a certain availability available based on the lease cycle right so that was like when everything you know when the luxury like Cartier was in the 60s which is now a Kate deal we did you know now all that's moving back to the core area of like 57th and lower 60s and things like that right so those shifts happen which make it difficult to like identify uh or make it's difficult for a permanent pattern to develop right whereas Rodeo is four blocks long it's finite it can't extend north it can't extend South.

22:31What's there is there.

22:38Are the leases traditionally, because I remember at one point there was a huge, this was probably like 17, 18, huge trend towards pop-up shops, especially in this, I was living in New York at the time to fill a lot of empty real estate in New York. And I remember a time when people started talking about the leases are too long, 10, 15-year leases. There were a lot of retailers that were overstored. They felt like the leases were too long. We need to do three-year leases. Do you see a trend towards shorter leases sticking? Was that just a blip in the market? No, I don't think shorter. No. And I'll tell you, there's multiple reasons for that.

23:23So I think what you're describing was a byproduct of the type of brands that were evolving during that period, right? So this is all on the heels of like the DTC brands and people getting their feet wet and not really wanting to like dive full into retail as a customer acquisition model and rather test the waters, right? I mean, the best example is I always go back to her because the quotes are just very funny and self-defeating in, in chronological order is like the Michael Prisman quotes of Everlane when it was like, retail's dead, retail, we're never going to do retail, da, da, da, da, da. And then there was like the GQ article that was like, you know, Everlane just disrupted itself.

24:06And it's like, no, you didn't disrupt yourself. You just went actually back to what a traditional model is, right? So I think that was more a function of the types of brands that were evolving during that period versus the reality of a dysfunctional real estate issue. Yeah, it's interesting because I obviously covered Everlane quite closely during that period. And I believe, I truly believe like Michael and Emily Weiss and these a lot, Sarah Shapiro is going to have a piece this week, actually, because we're, you know, it'll be out by the time we run this about kind of what happened to that first group of DTC brand, quote unquote DTC, because as you and I know, their DTC is not a 20-year-old thing.

24:55It's a hundred-year-old. It's always existed. But the reality of it was they really didn't want to be overstored. They didn't want to make the same mistakes. They thought wholesale was totally bad, which it's only kind of bad. They thought that all these things. And so So I believe that Michael truly believed, let's not do stores until we absolutely have to. But at some point, they realized that there is a value. So what is the value of having a store today? Well, the second part of that equation is just that if you actually do then decide that you want to go develop retail in earnest as a customer acquisition strategy in a distribution model, the CapEx is expensive, right?

25:39You can't amortize a store CapEx over two years, right? And be profitable. Or very few people can amortize it over a time period that short and be profitable. or you're just, you know, like not to sound like a jerk, you're building a probably pretty shitty, ugly store, right? Is, is the reality. So if it's one of these things where from a CapEx perspective, if you're going to commit, you have to commit, right? Um, you know, and I also think it became one of those things that you and I have discussed before where DTC stopped, stopped being, uh, discussed as a bit, as a, as a distribution model and started being discussed as a brand category.

26:20And the second all of those brands that had, frankly, quite like more or less nothing to do with each other other than the type of investment they had became a brand category, the whole thing got muddled. So what would you say in the 12 years since you opened that ACE in downtown LA, the luxury world? Not me, hundreds of people, but yes. Hundreds of people, but you were integral in the strategy. Since that opened, how have the luxury brands changed the way they approach real estate? I'm sure there have been a million different peaks and valleys, but what would you say the sort of trajectory has been?

27:06Yeah, to be honest, I don't know if I wouldn't say my perception of it, at least is that I wouldn't I don't know if the growth was necessarily intentional because someone sat down and said, I want this many more at someone at LVMH sat down and said, I want this many more Louis Vuitton stores by this date. right i think it was i think it was more a function of that period of time having incredibly cheap capital and then it's what do we do with the incredibly cheap capital and how does it how does it how do we use that for growth right yeah and then when real estate's cheap it's cheap right that's all you know one major shift you saw to answer your question is that you saw the big groups especially but not just the big groups buying a lot more real estate right because if If you can, because ultimately what that does is going back to the same converse, you know, the same point I just made on Madison, how it's infinite and you shift that allows you as a group to create, you know, more permanence within a particular area.

28:10If you're a group like an LVMH or a caring, or, you know, you own a handful of brands where you can create a singular density that in theory should create enough critical mass to be self-sustaining as an area. Right. So that's what you were seeing. You saw it a lot on Bond Street. You saw it a lot on Rodeo. You saw it a little less so in New York, but still somewhat in New York, obviously a lot in Paris. That's what I would say would be the major shift over the last 10 years, if we remain focused on the luxury conversation, that you've seen a lot more purchasing, which just allows them to control the environment.

28:50And even if it's a space that they don't intend to occupy, then they're leasing it to a competitor and they control the terms. So one thing probably about a year and a half ago, the CFO of LVMH said on an earnings call, we don't essentially hedged and was like, we don't have to buy it. We're happy essentially renting it in a great place is going to end up costing us the same amount of money. Essentially, he was like, we're open to both. Yeah. What do you think about that? And why, why would he say something like that? I mean, very simply because that's exactly true. It's like, you know, I don't think, I think they're big enough that it doesn't, you know, they're, I don't think one over the other is necessarily the priority, but if there's a good opportunity to buy, you know, if you're going to go lease a space on, you know, like, let's look at the Prada deal, right.

29:47That just happen. If that space is$450 million they bought it for and they're going to pay, you know, or whatever it was,$470, something in that range,$450 to$500. If they're going to pay, you know, $8 to$12 million a year in rent for a space on Fifth Avenue and that's sometimes more, like very quickly do the math. If you look at a 10 to 15 year lease term, it's like, well, at that point, you could own it, right? And obviously at that point, just from like a pure play real estate investment perspective there's tax efficiencies and things like that so i i think it's just like again it goes back to the period of cheap capital and it's like well great if i can own something really cheap then why not yeah yeah for sure and then and then the the non-economic part of it is just again simply control so yeah and these are truly direct to consumer businesses that want to control every single aspect of what they do.

Read the full transcript

30:44How has, speaking of controlling and developing these projects, the other thing that's happened in the last 20 years is these mixed use is an old term. But if you look at places like the rise of the country marts or there is a place, I did a story when I worked at Business of Fashion on, it was sort of tongue in cheek, like the idea of like the modernized outdoor mall, but you go to somewhere like Atlanta and there are a bunch of cool, I remember the brand Sid Mashburn would show up and they are actually at the Brentwood Country Mart. It would show up in a lot of these places, Warby Parker, these sort of very modernized developments that felt of the time and sort of, if you were going to go shopping, there would be like a cool restaurant there.

31:42It would make it feel like better than the traditional suburban mall or what have you. When did that sort of, as you mentioned, that acne store having very specific art in the store. When did that sort of, we need to be hip to what's happening in the culture start to permeate real estate? I mean, there's a few things I could point to that I think were impactful at a time, right? I think one is Chelsea Market in Jamestown, right? Where it was, hey, we're going to highly amenitize. Mixed use development is nothing new, right but typically when you see it in the bread and butter you know commercial sense it's like a horrible 400 unit apartment building that has like a subway and a basket robbins in the bottom right when you're driving down like hollywood boulevard or something like that obviously that's not what we're talking about i think obviously there were just people and developers who had foresight to make something that fed that same concept, no pun intended, but in a much more interesting way, right?

32:56One of the biggest, obviously, I think was Chelsea or Chelsea Market where you had, you know, Milk Studios where there was something creative happening and you had lots of good food and beverage operators and you had cool company. Anthropology. Anthropology and cool company offices upstairs. exactly. And, you know, a bookstore and just these like a minitized, nice environment things. And it goes back to the conversation that you, or the point you made earlier about, you know, well, how does this actually relate to conversion? Well, one way to increase dwell time to your question is get people there to do more things longer, right?

33:29It's, it's, it's fairly simplistic, you know, and, and they were very good at that. So even the, you know, in that 2012 era, they were like sort of the best at that, right? Was Jamestown. So, you know, you mentioned Sid Mashburn. That's like Westside Provisions in Atlanta where they are. That's also a Jamestown property, right? So they were like really early on that. And they were really early on the DTC train. I think they were quite like on the nose with that early. And then obviously you have, you know, at a much larger scale, things like Caruso and Palisades Village and in a smaller scale, things like all the country marts.

34:05And, you know, that's, I think. Cold drop yards in London is another example of that. When I first went there, I was like, no one's ever going to go there. And now I like to stay at that standard by King's Cross. I mean, that neighborhood has completely transformed in the last 15 years. It's wild. Look, if you're a developer who approaches a project before you build it by having a multi-hundred thousand square foot office lease with a tenant where everyone's relatively high earning like a Google, it's pretty easy to amenitize that property and give those people something that suits their interest, right?

34:44Whether it's entertainment, whether it's food and beverage, whether it's retail shopping. How long does it take for stuff to stick? There are two examples I'm thinking of. One is the Arts District in Miami, which I literally was like, this is never going to happen. You mean Miami Design District? Yeah, design district. Sorry, Craig Robbins, his people, they still pitch me all the time. I'm like, you don't need me anymore. But they used to pitch me every week something. I was like, this is never going to happen. No one's going to go to the design district in Miami. It happened. It fully happened.

35:19And then the other example, and I don't know how this is going, but Hudson Yards. And that's a weird one because of the time. but they really tried to create a new neighborhood. How long is it going to, I guess the question, both of these, both of those examples are like fully blown new neighborhoods were attempted. How do you, if you don't have a Google, Hudson Yards has a couple big companies. How do you make that happen? And how long does that take 15 years? Does that take? It's a tough question to answer what I'm always really sensitive to both whether it's store size, whether it's neighborhood and going back to the overall, how I look at positioning conversation is I'm really sensitive to scale, right?

36:05Like very, very sensitive to scale. I think there's things like a South coast plaza, which is part of its success in my opinion, and why it's one of the top performing shopping centers in the world is because of the scale, right? It's still big. It's a million square feet or so, But when you compare that to like a Dallas North Park Center, which is two, I believe it's two million. It's one and a half or two million. I can't recall off the top of my head. The scale is just like that much bigger where the flow is not the same, right? Like the way the end user, in this case, the shopper interacts with things, it doesn't have the same flow.

36:46It's like when you go to a hotel lobby and it's empty and it feels kind of like, why am I here? Again, something Ace always did really well was not make two big lobbies so that the lobby felt full so that you had some vibe. Right. Yeah. I think it's the same thing with all those places. I think Hudson Yards, you know, honestly, I don't know how it's doing. I've done one deal there ever many years ago. And I think it was. to me, it was just so ambitious that the scale did not reflect necessarily the environment of that suits New Yorkers, put it that way, right? That suits your average high value customer New Yorker.

37:26I think comparatively Miami design district took a long way, took a long time. I think it took a long time as well, because the hardest thing to do to answer your question, when, how long do these things take? The hardest thing to do is just change consumer behavior, right? If you're fundamentally changing consumer behavior from, I'm either going to this mall, Aventura, or that mall, Bell Harbor, and now I have this new area that historically was, you know, edgy and everybody has their preconceptions and things like that. It's just difficult to change, right? And so they've changed it with museums.

37:58They've changed it with hospitality. They've changed it with all these elements that in the early days it didn't have. And now it's very much a thing. So, you know, I don't know how to answer exactly how long it takes. I think it's property specific, it's city specific, it's consumer specific, you know, just like what someone in Miami buys from Dior is different than what someone in New York buys from Dior. right yeah yeah and hudson yards is an interesting one i haven't been in the mall since pre-covid but i do go there a lot to the whole foods to the um daily provisions which is an amazing place i love i think it's a great chain the food hall thing or no it's it's danny meyer's like rotisserie essentially boston market cool the bougie Boston market and they have one in like Cobble Hill.

38:51They have one or Borum Hill. They have one there and it's an easy, like if you want a salad type thing, I think it's a smart concept, but, and the whole foods and, and that stuff, if you're up there, it's like on the way home type thing. And, but, but the question of like, who would want to live there? Um, anyway, so we're, we're talking about these brand new built from scratch neighborhoods, essentially. What about neighborhoods that have been around forever? We just did a commercial project, full disclosure, with Tishman Spire and Rock Center, which honestly, a huge reason why I wanted to do it was because I am obsessed with what they've done at Rock Center.

39:38I'm obsessed with the food they've brought in. I am obsessed with the retail mix, which is, by the way, not like Chanel. It's like Todd Snyder. I did the McNally Jackson and the rough trade there. And so why do you think that's worked? And why do you think it's... Because that's a hard... That's midtown. That's not somewhere that a lot of New Yorkers want to spend time. And they do. But what I've appreciated about it is when I am in New York, I try to go to the theater. And so there's restaurants to eat at before. It's fun if I'm going to go shopping at Bergdorf Goodman to have lunch at Lodi afterwards.

40:19or what do you think, how do you revive a neighborhood that was seen as sort of, I don't want to say it was a hell hole because that can be reserved for Times Square, but it wasn't like a neighborhood people wanted to spend time in previously. I mean, look, that one, and this is not to, obviously I did deals there, right? I can't, I don't think I can speak to those deals and how they were structured explicitly, but I mean, look, when you have a, when you have a project like that or a building like that, where you're talking many millions of square feet, right? You have to take into account that a couple hundred thousand square feet of retail is not what's going to make the project work or not from a financial perspective for the owner.

41:08Right. So a project of that scale, they're able to put a significantly higher focus on making sure the retail is uh in amenity that people want to engage with versus just simply the best economic deal and what that for them and what that means is that they're able to offer you know attractive deals to tenants and that's that's a reality. So it's not to say, you know, I'm very, I'm very careful in how I'm framing this to not say that they bought all the tenants or anything like that, right? They've done a great job and I agree with you, but they're also in the fortunate position that due to the nature of the project, they're allowed to make, they're able to make deals that are economically attractive to a tenant to bring good tenants.

42:00And that's great. Yeah. And, and so a question for you would be, I think of something like South Street Seaport. Yeah. I will say I haven't been there in probably a year, but there were many attempts of doing, and I don't know, maybe that's also Tishman's Spire. No, it's not. So there have been many attempts to build the same sort of like fun mix. South Street Seaport, Faneuil Hall in Boston, these kinds of places used to be super cheesy. Abercrombie and Fitch, there was a store both of them called the Christmas Dove. I worked there in college at Faneuil Hall in Boston. There's a Victoria's Secret, like a little bit more.

42:41The prior generation of those sorts of outdoor shopping centers in urban areas were really highly commercial. And they've tried to make that. I think a lot of these developers have tried to make them more feel more with it or more of the time where people do spend more money on clothing and big ticket items. So at one point, there was a 10 Corso Como in South Street Seaport. There was, I remember Aurora James had an amazing deal there. She had a Brother Valleys there for years. That never gelled for me. And maybe it's working better now, but without you having to speak badly of any of these places, why does why do some of them work and why do some of them not is it just the person picking the partnerships and who they're reaching out to or no i i think look there's just like in a fashion brand where you know the stereotype of fashion brands from some places is just that the person at the top makes the decision and everyone's a soldier or some places they have more you know collaborative decision making and processes it's just different right and i think it's the same with the real estate companies where it's like you look at something like tishman spire rob spire is a new yorker right like he's going to want something that he's going to enjoy patronizing as a new yorker right so i think there's just a little bit more of a uh a tuned in perception of what the desire for it to be actually is right whereas if you look at south street seaport you know that's howard's used company at the time it was under the tenure of the previous ceo david weinrab right who david weinrab is dallas he's las vegas he's uh he he i think he leans more entertainment and sometimes entertainment has a tendency to feel a bit um like cheesy for lack of a word, right?

44:52Yeah, it's not going to appeal to everybody, right? So if you, I think, to me it's that simple. Like I, you know, I don't think it goes much deeper than that, to be honest.

45:31What are brands looking to get out of a store now? Are they expecting the per square foot sales to be as much as they used to be? is it more about getting people in to get them exposed so they buy stuff online? Because my experience in many stores is that I go in the store I tried on and I say, see ya. And I go online and get it for a discount somewhere. I asked my friend who has a discount, or I know that this place is going to do 10 % because I've never shopped there. And sometimes I buy direct, But, you know, I and I look like if you're one a really high net worth customers spending sometimes a million dollars a year at an individual brand, that's a different person.

46:19And that's who they're mostly relying on. But for for these stores, are these are these stores created for just the person that's spending 70 grand? They're dropping 70 K when they walk in somewhere or they or they like what is the the. goal of these stores today so i mean look you went through a period 10 15 years ago where there was very much this i'm gonna get a store on in time square or herald square or madison or fifth avenue that is never going to be profitable and it's a billboard right i think those days are long gone but i agree with you the shopper shops differently now i'm the same way like i'll buy something on Mr.

47:02Porter and, you know, try three things and return them and whatever. And it's just like part of the process, right? Which that type of behavior is fundamentally why people are realizing e-com isn't as great as they thought it was, right? And DTC isn't as great as they thought it was. Similarly, I think you're seeing the more recent shift to, you know, directly brand owned retail stores because of the complexities and challenges with wholesale, right? And all of the multi-brand stores and things like this and beyond just the, you know, issues that you hear that you've covered multiple times about actually being paid or are they going to last and they're holding all this inventory or whatever.

47:46It's just that I think as a brand, especially an incredibly high touch brand or special brand like the ones at least I we endeavor to work with and do work with is you need to control your customer journey right and at the end of the day having a store is the best venue in which to control your customer journey from a staffing perspective from a design perspective from a storytelling perspective etc right like without a doubt it's the best but that but i think brands now are maybe less strict about you know my e-com pnl is entirely bifurcated from my retail pnl is entirely bifurcated from my wholesale pnl right i think that and this goes back to the conversation about you know retail apocalypse and retail is dead and then it was wholesale and now we're back to this it's like these are shifts right these very simply these are shifts and each brand is going to have a different equilibrium in the multi-channel world that we live in of what's going to work best for them however i think as it's always been and will continue to be that retail is the best place to own your customer journey and i don't really think anyone can make an argument against that yeah okay final question for you and and maybe you can just pop on anytime we have a real estate question and do like five minutes.

49:10I am having a lot of conversations with people right now that feel extremely big and existential. And I tend to not want to get hyperbolic and also believe that everyone thinks they're living in the worst time ever and everyone needs to chill out because it's just going to get worse. And so if you frame it that way, I think the bigger thing is that the world changes and either you change with it or you don't. And if you don't, you get left behind. And that's how people should frame it. But all that said, this year has been really hard for luxury goods. This is the first time since the industry became a real industry that consolidated.

49:55So the last 25 years that they've been truly challenged. The customer in China is not coming back in the same way. It just isn't. It's fundamentally not going to happen. And I was talking to a CEO about this who's been in the industry for 35 years. The fundamental thing is that the industry is mostly consolidated, and the way consumers consume luxury goods is changing. and there aren't going to be lines out the door that are real as much as there used to be for a while. Like it's just not the, the stuff inside the stores needs to change in order to like, I think about, I always have used this anecdote millions of times.

50:44Apologies to anyone who actually listens to this more than once, but, um, I've used this anecdote about when I was in college, everyone would stand outside of tower records on Newberry street in Boston for, or a Newberry comics, whatever, if you're cooler and you went to Newberry comics, I was too intimidated, but you would stand outside for the record. I think all albums came out on Tuesdays. You would stand out and at midnight on Tuesday, you would, you would get it that off white or Supreme or whatever in 2018 was that example of youth, youth culture, people standing in line buying stuff. That is gone and something new will replace it.

51:25But I think the question for a lot of these brands right now is like, what happens in 2026? Do you have new product coming in, a revived creative strategy at a lot of these big companies, and then suddenly the consumer just bounces back and it's like, yeah, I want another handbag or I want another jacket? Or is there a total true shift in the way these companies approach how they sell things and what they sell? Yeah. I mean, look, I'm not a fortune teller or an economist, right? So I can't predict what the economic outlook is going to turn out to be. And I can't predict consumer behavior. What I do know or what I feel is that going back to the comment I made about how when DTC shifted from being discussed as a distribution model and started being discussed as a brand category, I see those same kind of patterns with the luxury industry right now.

52:29And that's what concerns me above all else, which is that I don't know that any of them, that's not true. At least within the large groups, I don't know that many of them can really articulate what it is they're selling or doing, right? And I think that's really disconcerting because even personally as a customer who, you know, I would say as a luxury customer, I buy nice watches, I buy nice cars, whatever, I buy nice clothes. I don't walk into those stores, right? I don't buy that stuff for myself. The stuff I like is like, you know, Davide Baranchini's Gaia Cashmere and, you know, like that.

53:15I want that. Like, I'm going to do, no, but I'm going to do that instead of. I tease. I'm teasing. Huge fan. But to me, that or like a Drake's or something that like. Yes. I think what the luxury brands have done that has backfired on them is the customer incentive for being a customer is shallow, right? In the sense that it's not for them. It's not for the end user anymore. It's not that, oh, I get value out of this because it makes me feel good or because I understand its provenance or because I know a story and a history about it, right? The luxury customer of today that the big groups have engendered, they don't care about that.

54:01And so it makes it very easy to just as quickly not become a customer if the value proposition you're creating for them and the validation you're creating for them after buying your product is shallow. It just disappears that quickly. So I think that's more of like an inward industry thing that needs to have a bigger conversation. Um, but I think, you know, it's, you know, you use the record example. It's like discovering a band, right? It's like, it's like discovering a band for before someone else and being to tell, being able to tell your friends about that. That's cool, right? That makes you feel good.

54:41That is what empowers you. Owning like a really expensive sweater doesn't really empower you, right? It's whatever, right? And look, everything's fun and easy and lighthearted when things are good. But to your point, as things start to soften, you start to look at things differently naturally. And that's, I think, the place we're at right now. Yeah. And I think that neither you nor I have any sort of, we know this is all a construct. 100%. Everything is all of this is a construct. But the thing is, it needs to feel good. It needs to feel like the word value is overused, but it needs to feel there needs to feel like there's a value.

55:23This is why I bought this for a reason, whether the reason is because I think it's cute and I have a bunch of money or it's because I think I'm going to wear it forever. And if you look at the brands that are succeeding right now, and I had a little thing on Monday about craft and how this word craft is definitely being overused. But also, you look at the brands that consumers, the hottest brands at LVMH or Laura Piana, Leleve. These are brands that, yes, Jonathan Anderson's a superstar designer and there are people buying for him. but he focused so much on, I went to this Loewe exhibit in Japan that was, it paid homage to him and was like very respectful of him and had an entire room of all his runway work.

56:12But also like it was about the bags and the construction, but in a fun way, it didn't take itself too seriously. It and the St. Laura Piana, whatever you think you can, they can sell$2 ,000 jeans because they're a fabric mill. and a person who can afford it is like, I know that the cashmere sweater I'm getting from there, even if I'm overpaying is the best cashmere, or I think it probably is the best. So like they did that pointy toe almond flat that I bet Kate, your wife has, or may have thought about buying. And that's under a thousand dollars. And so, yes, that's expensive, but there's a value at Bottega.

56:58there's a value in it. I think they've put themselves in a place where they've just like archetyped all their customers in such a specific way that like Kate and I and our daughter were at, we were in Cabo a few weeks ago. I don't remember what, I think Kate's birthday we went and we stayed at Las Ventanas, right? And I was like, and you see the other families and I'm like, I was like, this sounds, I can, I sounds fucked up for lack of a better word. I'm like, I can tell that family's from Miami. I can tell that family's from Dallas. Right. And then later on you talk to them and it's like, hi, I'm from Miami and hi, I'm from Dallas.

57:40And like, I'm like, everybody was very nice people, obviously. And like people we would all be friends with if we met them and hung out. But like the fact that we've, to your point of it being a construct, it's been so constructed that it's become an archetype and almost like we're memeing ourselves is the problem. And I don't know how we get out of that, but I think that's the conversation that needs to be had. Yeah. I think for a company like LVMH, and it does kind of go back to them for me and because they own pretty much every business that I write about at this point, is that that's a really diversified business and it can't just be about clothes or handbags, which is obviously a very large part of their business and has become a much bigger part of their business in the last 15 years.

58:32The wine and spirits used to be a much larger part of the pie and it's decreased. So I think the thing that they do really well is that they think about it as investing in culture. And so they invest in the places where the culture is at at the time. and then as that evolves they evolve with it that being said like this is a gonna be a big change and we don't we don't know they don't know the china piece i think is the the most complicated part i think the problem with that argument or that premise if that's what they're saying and not just them but anyone if that's the premise is that you know are you are you creating culture or are you pandering to a place where the culture's at and those are different things And ultimately at the level they're at or any group is at, if you're actually a luxury brand and making an impact, you should be creating, you should be the creator of the culture, not the, hey, I'm selling to whatever the culture demands at the moment.

59:34Well, this is a challenge for them in particular because they are second movers. So what they've done mostly is look at what other people have done, look at what Chanel in particular has done and sort of mimic that or look at what Hermes has done and mimic that. But Chanel in particular, there's no LVMH without Chanel. Those brands were built exactly on what the Wertheimers did there. Like it's there in Karl Lagerfeld, like there isn't anything different, but, and, and even if you look at the last 15 years, uh, caring hires, Alessandro and Demna, then LV's hires Virgil, like, like, so they, they're, they're fast followers and they are the best at executing of any other.

1:00:28They, they do it better than anyone else. They're the best brand managers, but I do think that you're right. Like look at the incredible success they've had with Laura Piana. It's, it's truly remarkable. And they have looked at what Hermes did and they have followed what they need to follow there and, and also just use their principles. And it is truly amazing. But this next phase, like what to me, what it all comes down to is you're right. Like how much of culture can they actually create themselves? How fast do they need to be with follow up? And also China, China, China, China, China. If they can't get people to buy stuff in China, no matter what, they need to come up with a different strategy.

1:01:13And I think to tie it all back and close the loop where, you know, you said it all comes back to real estate and you're saying they're fast followers. that this is the segment where everybody was the most concerned with co-tenancy and who they're next to and who they sit next to and not you know where i think the really truly luxury brands like you know not lowercase l fashion luxury but really luxury meaning someone doing something unique it's like no i actually want to be by like the chicest restaurant no i actually want to be like under the chicest family office where the best people, the most successful people in the world are, have their family offices and that, and then I'm going to sell them a watch.

1:02:00Right. It's not like I care about being by, you know, Louis Vuitton, Dior, Balenciaga, et cetera. Right. Like that's, so yeah. Jonathan, this was so fun. I love chatting with you. It's good that we do have similar tastes. Yeah. Because then it might not be as fun. No, but you know, you're the best. Have a great weekend. Thanks. You too. I'll talk to you soon. Bye. Fashion People is a presentation of Odyssey in partnership with Puck. This show was produced and edited by Molly Nugent. Special thanks to our executive producers, Puck co-founder John Kelly, executive editor Ben Landy, and director of editorial operations, Gobby Grossman.

1:02:43An additional thanks to the team at Odyssey, J.D. Crowley, Jenna Weiss-Berman, and Bob Tabador.

From the publisher

Lauren welcomes Jonathan Schley, vice chairman of Newmark’s global retail advisory, to the pod to discuss real estate’s place in the global fashion industry, from the role of physical stores in today’s shopping journey to the reasons certain retail developments look the way they do. It all comes down to real estate, and Jonathan explains why.

To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Fashion People

All 182 episodes
Stores: What Are They Good For?Fashion People · 1 h 6 min
Listen in VO