It's OK to Fail, but You Have to Do It Properly

11 Sep 2026 · 44 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How to think about failure at work—distinguishing “intelligent” failures from unproductive ones—using a framework of smart, small experiments in new territory; then connecting this to psychological safety, burnout, teamwork, and leadership amid anxiety and AI.

Guest backgrounds

Amy Edmondson is a Harvard Business School professor known for research on psychological safety. She’s authored books including The Science of Failing Well and the forthcoming Right Kind of Wrong.

Key claims

“Happy talk” about failing often lacks a coherent framework; organizations should be pro-experimentation but pro-smart experiments (hypothesis-driven, smallest possible, aligned with the firm’s value proposition). In known territory, failure should be rare. Psychological safety is linked to lower burnout; anxiety pushes people into isolation, eroding team health.

Notable examples

Airlines’ simulator training tolerates failure to prevent major accidents. A Citibank $800 million wiring error is cited as unproductive failure. Metrics for smart failures must be tailored to context (e.g., clinical trials vs. a bad blind date).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introducing Amy Edmondson and Book Discussion

0:34 to 0:51

Adi introduces guest Amy Edmondson and her book on failure.

“It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks.”

Introducing Amy Edmondson and Book Discussion

2:07 to 3:56

Adi introduces guest Amy Edmondson and her book on failure.

“Talented teams leveraging the right technology to uncover insights that illuminate opportunity.”

Rethinking Failure in the Workplace

3:56 to 4:56

Amy discusses the cultural perceptions of failure in organizations.

“And then I kind of poked around and realized that the truth is many people were still confused about failure.”

Navigating Failure Tolerance Across Industries

4:56 to 9:07

Amy explores the variation of failure tolerance in different industries.

“It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once.”

Understanding Productive vs. Unproductive Failure

9:07 to 14:00

A discussion on distinguishing between productive and unproductive failures.

“Because clearly, none of us want them to be comfortable with failure.”

Exploring Workplace Challenges

14:00 to 14:49

Learn about the current state of workplace engagement and productivity issues.

“So a failure, even an intelligent failure, you know, in new territory, new discovery, is no longer intelligent the second time it happens.”

Exploring Workplace Challenges

15:22 to 15:40

Learn about the current state of workplace engagement and productivity issues.

“You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome?”

Understanding Anxiety in the Workplace

15:45 to 21:44

Discuss the real anxiety faced by employees and its implications.

“I mean, obviously it's hard to generalize, but, you know, are we suffering?”

The Impact of the Pandemic on Team Dynamics

21:44 to 23:08

Examine how the pandemic has changed team interactions and management roles.

“It's almost as if we've lost sight of tensions and trade-offs.”

Navigating the Generative AI Era

23:08 to 28:05

Insights on how generative AI is reshaping workplace dynamics and fears.

“And I I think when I think we're right now in a sort of a moment of not helping people value the collective.”
Show all 16 chapters

Audience Questions on Metrics and Feedback

28:05 to 30:46

Explore how to measure smart failures and the importance of feedback in teams.

“And, you know, so let's hear what they have to say.”

The Challenge of Speaking Up

30:47 to 35:06

Understand the reluctance to provide negative feedback and how to tackle it effectively.

“So here's another question along the lines.”

Leading Through Failures and Mistakes

35:07 to 38:50

Learn how to navigate discussions after failures and distinguish mistakes from failures.

“And so it's a thoughtful, deliberately learning-oriented conversation designed to help us be better next time.”

Re-Energizing Teams in 2023

38:51 to 40:24

Discover strategies to reconnect with team purpose and navigate challenges.

“It's like Buckminster Fuller used to say it was foolish to burn down the house to keep warm on a cold winter's night.”

The Empathy vs. Productivity Pendulum

40:25 to 42:01

Examine the balance between empathy and productivity in leadership.

“Well, maybe that's a good point to end on.”

Introduction to AI Opportunities

42:01 to 42:14

Learn about the discussion on AI's potential impacts on work.

“So I want to thank you all for tuning in to The New World of Work.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new.

0:36It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+.

1:09right so if you recognize that funky guitar riff that's right this is Harvard Business Reviews the new world of work I am Adi Ignatius editor-in-chief of HBR and we are back with a new season of the new world of work so each week we will I'll be interviewing a CEO, a thought leader, somebody interesting who can inspire us, can educate us on some of the changing dynamics of the workplace. There are a lot of big issues that come up that we're all facing. I think all of us, whether we're in big companies, small companies, whether we're in the U.S. or somewhere else. So we want to bring in people, have conversations that we hope will help you as you think about how to make your company better, how to strengthen your career.

1:50We have a great guest today. She is Amy Edmondson of Harvard Business School. I'm going to come back to a proper introduction in a second. But before we do that, let's hear from our friends at KPMG who are our sponsors for this season. At KPMG, it's our people who make the difference for our clients. Talented teams leveraging the right technology to uncover insights that illuminate opportunity. Ready to make the difference together?

2:25Okay, so as I said, our guest today is Amy Edmondson, the Harvard Business School professor who's probably best known for her work on psychological safety in the workplace. She's authored a number of books, including the forthcoming Right Kind of Wrong, The Science of Failing Well, which will be available very soon in September. So Amy, welcome to the new world of work. Great to be here, Adi. Thanks for having me. So just before we start, to our audience, you know, I'm going to be talking to Amy. We would love to take audience questions later, you know, put them into the chat, and we'll try to get to as many as possible.

3:00Quickly, let me just say, if you're an HBR subscriber watching this, you can head to hbr.org slash newsletters to sign up for the New World of Work, which is an email newsletter where I will offer an inside look at each of these interviews and talk about some of the ideas that came out of them. So that's a little pressure, Amy, to produce newsletter-worthy content today. Pressure's on. I think you can do that. So, all right, so your book is about failure, primarily about failure, and let's start there. You know, I was under the impression that we'd sort of come around, that we all got that failure is noble and not shameful and provides useful learning lessons.

3:41But you're writing a book that seems to be saying that we need to think hard and maybe differently about failure. So talk about what you're trying to accomplish with this book and why you're taking on this topic. Well, you know, I was with you. And then I kind of poked around and realized that the truth is many people were still confused about failure. So there is a lot of happy talk about failure out there. There's the virtual mantra of Silicon Valley, fail fast, fail often, failure is good, let's learn from failure, let's have failure parties, let's have failure resumes, and so forth. And the truth is, the future of work will be riddled with failure.

4:21We can't just wish it away, even if we wanted to, we have to work with it. But I think no one can really take to heart the happy talk about failure unless they have a coherent framework. So you could think of it as the two camps, right? The Silicon Valley fail fast, fail often. And then the other camp, which is, yeah, right. I live in the real world. Failure is not an option. And they're both right, right? Or they're both partially right. But neither is terribly helpful nor context specific. And so this episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once.

5:05So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks.

5:42Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+. I think the happy talk, when it's not qualified with a coherent way of making distinctions between the good kind of failure and the not so good kind is possibly more destructive than helpful. You know, it drives the honest conversation underground. So I think it's important to talk about the kinds of failure for which we really should be welcoming it with open arms and the kinds where we maybe shouldn't. So I think the best thing you can say about failure is if you have a culture that permits failure, that tolerates failure, it means you're stretching, you're pushing, you're trying to innovate, you're trying to do things that are difficult.

6:34You know, and I think of that as a sort of, you know, part of the definition of what is a digital company. A digital company experiments frequently and tries and fails and is able to tolerate failure. But I'm interested, though, and I would guess if you talk to most companies, they'd say, yeah, we do that. That's the culture we have. We didn't used to, but we do that. So I want to push you a little bit more on, you know, you seem to, if I hear you, it seems to be saying that's the rhetoric, that's the happy talk. But in reality, that's not really how the world works. Yeah. I mean, first of all, it's not how most incentives are set up.

7:13I'm not saying uniformly that's the case, but most of the time failure is not rewarded in organizations and people would rather do anything but fail. And so, you know, I think part of the problem, and you're right, maybe a better way to talk about this is not as failure, but as experimentation. We have to be very pro-experimentation, but we have to be pro-smart experiments. So, and I think smart failures are the result of smart experiments. And smart experiments are ones that happen in new territory. Honestly, If you can look up the answer, find the recipe, find the blueprint, please do. No need to experiment.

7:52New territory in pursuit of a goal that's consistent with the value proposition of the organization with a hypothesis. You know, you've done your homework and importantly, as small as possible. So that those are the kinds of both experiments and failures we must welcome with open arms. They are discoveries, and they allow us to figure out quickly what to try next. But a portion of the book is devoted to, you know, what do we know about best practices for failure-proofing, that which can be failure-proofed. The activities, the operations in your company that are in known territory are ones that should be well set up to make failure extremely rare.

8:44Are there industries that do not tolerate failure? I mean, I was thinking, I don't know, airline pilots. I mean, you don't really want them to fail. This isn't merely a rhetorical question. Are there industries that really don't tolerate failure? And can you look at them and say, you actually can get interesting results if you have that kind of policy? Well, let's start with airlines, right? Because clearly, none of us want them to be comfortable with failure. And yet, I think the reason why airlines have an extraordinary record of success and safety is because they're willing and able to talk about failure.

9:25So the failures that they do tolerate happen in the simulator, that there's training, there's a lot of emphasis on speaking up early to prevent something worse from happening. So this is not, you know, their safety record does not come from being intolerant of failure, but rather being intolerant of, you know, major accidents. Therefore, we have to be very tolerant of the research. This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra.

10:05Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense?

10:42There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+. Reality of human error so that we can catch and correct, so that we can train, so that we can allow people to take the kind of risks and experiments we were just talking about in safe settings like the simulator, not in the execution of the real duties. So I but I don't think it's possible to say, you know, to describe industries in in the way your question implies. I think there's variation across companies. So they're picking industry, fast moving consumer goods. It's going to be not that hard to find differences in cultural failure tolerance within those industries across across companies.

11:30So a more sensible way to put that is that some companies, I think, are doing better than others in having a healthy tolerance of intelligent failure. Again, I'm Adi Ignatius, editor of Harvard Business Review. My guest is Amy Edmondson from Harvard Business School. If you have questions for Amy, put them in the chat and we'll try to get to some later. So I don't want to just talk about failure, but I do have a couple more questions. And, you know, you started to talk about, I guess, you didn't use the term, but what a productive failure might look like. But, you know, you did mention that they're good and bad failures.

12:09And, you know, I'd love to hear you talk a little bit more about what's the difference and how does one try to make sure their failures are the good kind? Sure. Well, in known territory where we have a process or a formula for getting the result we want, it's best practice to use that process, use that formula and get the result we want. So when a Citibank employee a number of years ago accidentally made a small human error and accidentally wired$800 million to a client that shouldn't have received it, that was a basic unproductive failure. It turns out they were not even able to get the money back.

12:52So not celebrating that kind of failure. And you're right, a productive failure is one where we get new and useful knowledge, new knowledge that helps us go forward in creating the kind of value we're trying to create in our market for our customers. So we discovered something that we could not have discovered without trying it, without the experiment. And would you recommend that there be an elaborate postmortem? I mean, I think, you know, the military, whatever you think about the military, they're very focused on doing, you know, detailed postmortem, what happened, what went wrong, why, presumably to learn from that and not have it happen again.

13:39Do you believe in that, doing a kind of extensive postmortem on something that didn't work out? Absolutely. I mean, and I think the word extensive, probably a better word is thorough. It is not the case that a postmortem has to take inordinate amounts of time, but it should be thorough. It should be analytical and look carefully at the different facets of the failure to understand accurately what happened and why for the express purpose of preventing that exact failure from happening ever again. So a failure, even an intelligent failure, you know, in new territory, new discovery, is no longer intelligent the second time it happens.

14:23I want to shift gears a little bit and talk more generally about the workplace. You know, really, the question is, you know, are we OK? You know, you wrote a recent piece in Harvard Business Review that suggested maybe things are not so great, that the relatively low levels of engagement or productivity, high rates of burnout, you know, we can expect. This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean.

15:09And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+.

15:44...to why that's true, but is that accurate? I mean, obviously it's hard to generalize, but, you know, are we suffering? And if so, how do we respond to that as managers? Well, I don't have a kind of systematic worldwide data set from which I can make solid inferences about how people are doing. My impression comes from informal conversations, qualitative research, reading HBR and so many other outlets to sort of see how people are doing. So really, in a way, I'm commenting on the conversation in HBR and so many other sort of business media contexts, maybe LinkedIn and elsewhere. And one thing I think I can say for sure is that the anxiety is real.

16:39And people are worried about the future. They're worried about it on so many fronts. They're worried about climate change. They're worried about AI. They're worried about burnout. As you mentioned, I'll come back to burnout. But that anxiety tends to push us toward a retreat to kind of our individual corner. And people start to think, am I going to be okay? And they become more focused on their own well-being than on the sort of health of the team or health of the organization. And that gives rise to a real potential for erosion, even vicious cycles, where organizations find themselves in the trap of responding to requests and issues in isolation one by one.

17:25And so we need a sort of more holistic way of thinking about it. And I see limited evidence of companies sort of being at least described as pausing to think about the larger picture, their value proposition, what it implies for how they must be structured and led to get the necessary work done and how to organize that work with all its variety and variable needs in a kind of thoughtful way and how to inspire and motivate people to do it well. So let me just briefly go to the burnout issue because there actually has been some recent data, some studies that have caught my eye showing that the burnout is systematically higher when psychological safety is lower, right?

18:16So, for instance, it seems to me that some portion of the burnout is associated with loneliness and isolation. I think it's fair to say that we can endure many challenges when we feel genuinely that we're in it together, that we're connected and engaged with our colleagues in trying to sort of navigate these challenges.

18:46Yeah, so there are a number of responses to that. And, you know, the idea that there's a, I don't know, a loneliness trend or epidemic or something like that. I mean, you know, one can't help but think, okay, you know, is some of this related to the pandemic, which, you know, for many of us broke up teams, created work environments with work from home that in many ways is fantastic for people who are balancing their work and life. It must take a toll at the same time on something, on maybe the teaming imperative that you've written about. Is that kind of, I mean, is that your hunch that the pandemic and our response to it is maybe contributing to this?

19:34Yeah, I do think the pandemic took a toll on us, on all of us. And, and, and.

19:57or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18+. This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners. Sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9 % of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier, so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together.

20:38Shop now at palmolive.com. You know, it created such an obvious uncertainty that, you know, it was such an obvious disruption. It wasn't sort of the gradual shifts that we're normally used to. It was a very abrupt shift. And it gave rise to all these really wonderful and I think productive experiments on different work arrangements. And now it's time for very systematic assessment of what's working and what isn't. And it can't be incremental. And it can't also be based on what do people say they want. Because oftentimes what we say we want is not actually what we need or truly want in the longer term, bigger picture to get where we need and want to go.

21:34Yeah, I mean, you talked a second ago about trying to have a kind of comprehensive policy and approach. you know that that i mean if i heard you right not not dealing with people sort of always uniquely individually but but that's sort of the nature of management now i mean it seems to me that and i think the pandemic contributed uh to that for a lot of people but you know we've written about this that suddenly managers are expected to be you know in addition to everything else you know almost like psychiatrists that there's a an openness for people to share their their their personal situations challenges problems and that it's the role of the manager increasingly to engage with that in an intelligent way so you end up where you know management becomes hyper personalized um but i think maybe you're already on to the the risk which is losing the the sense of the kind of teaming and the collective effort.

22:38It's almost as if we've lost sight of tensions and trade-offs. I mean, there will always be a tension between me and we, right? There'll always be a tension between sort of my desires in the moment and my aspirations over the long term. And, you know, we can think of so many examples of that. If you ask me what I want, you know, pay me infinitely and don't ask me to do anything and let me eat ice cream all day. Right. But that's not going to get me where I really, really need to go and want to go. I want to make a difference. And I I think when I think we're right now in a sort of a moment of not helping people value the collective.

23:22I mean, why we as human beings, we're social creatures. That's part of it. But it's also we want to matter. We want to matter to others. We want to matter in in some way that's larger than ourselves and our sort of hedonistic desires. And to matter, I think we have to. You could think of it in a way in an old-fashioned management theory way of the theory of the firm. If markets worked by themselves, we would just have only contractors doing tasks. And it would be efficient. It would be sensible. It would be logical. But it doesn't work because a lot of the work we have to do is inherently collaborative and dynamically so.

24:07It isn't easily parceled out, dividing and conquering style. It requires us to really work together in kind of meaningful ways. The good news is that can be a very engaging, rewarding, exciting experience. The bad news is it's not easy to manage. But I think we can go down that rabbit hole of each person has to be managed differently. each person, you're almost a psychiatrist to that person. Real value shows up in reliability. You don't have to second guess. Like a set of Firestone all-season tires. They're designed to deliver confidence-inspiring wet weather traction and a quieter ride, no matter the road, season after season.

24:58Firestone all-season tires. For durability, you can count on. Just like people count on you. Firestone, always dependable since 1900.

25:33cleaning even easier so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive.com. Versus let's step back and rethink how do we design our activities, our operations so that we create the most value for those we serve. Yeah, I love that. And I have to say that I don't think companies have figured that out yet. You this disruption of COVID, I think opened our eyes to some flexibility. But I think the things you're putting your finger on, we're trying to solve for that. And I think a lot of us haven't yet and need to keep experimenting. So we're in this age of anxiety or where there's just, as we said, there's burnout and all that.

26:21And then you throw on top of that AI, open a generative AI, and a kind of fear, possibly irrational, possibly not. The generative AI will be able to do all of our jobs, you know, as well or almost as well at almost no cost, you know, than what we can do now. I don't, I assume you haven't done quantitative research, but qualitatively, you know, how, you know, what's your advice for people as open AI, I mean, it's generative AI sort of enters the workplace at every level and the possibilities become clearer and clearer. What's your advice, I guess, to managers and or employees, like how to cope with this, not get flattened by it, but maybe benefit from it?

27:10Well, as you indicated, it's a little outside my wheelhouse, except for the effects on people and culture. And so I speak from the perspective of someone listening at the margins to the many conversations in work and social gatherings alike and media. And I think you're right. I think fear is the dominant emotion, right? Certainly some are excited. Some are super optimistic about the amazing changes to come. But I think casually I hear more fear than optimism. The truth is we need both. We need that sort of this is here. We need some sort of positive, thoughtful, design oriented approaches to experiment and figure out what's going to work.

27:56But I don't think they're going to be simple solutions to the dramatic shakeup of what's possible. So let's go to some audience questions, because we do have them coming in. We have a large and engaged audience. And, you know, so let's hear what they have to say. So here's a question from Omar from Monterey in Mexico. And the question is, what kind of metrics can be used to measure smart failures? Well, you know, my first response is, that's a good idea to have metrics. And one of the things that I've spent the most time studying is how many failures just don't even get the chance to be measured because people don't speak up about them.

Read the full transcript

28:41And so this, in fact, this was sort of how I got into this whole topic in the first place was the discovery of dramatic differences across groups, even within the same organization, and their sort of willingness to speak up about things that go wrong rather than just things that go right. So here's the challenge more broadly than just people not necessarily speaking up. The challenge is the category of intelligent failure covers vast territory. So I think the metrics have to be tailored to the context. And let me illustrate vast territory. A well-run clinical trial on a new cancer drug is an intelligent failure when it turns out it doesn't have the efficacy that we hoped.

29:29It was in new territory. There was no other way to find out but do a clinical trial. It's the right size. It's no bigger than it has to be. You know, it's hypothesis driven in pursuit of a goal, right? But so is like a really bad blind date, right? Intelligent failure. Maybe your friend thought you'd like each other. You are willing to go out and have a coffee. You know, smallest possible new territory in pursuit of a goal, all the rest. So, you know, a bad blind date and a failed clinical trial are clearly apples and oranges, yet they both qualify under the category. So I think the best way to answer the measurement question is let's make sure the criteria are adhered to, and then let's think about what's the right frequency, given the work we're trying to do, of intelligent failures.

30:22Another way to say that is what's the right frequency of experimentation, How often should we be trying new things to push the envelope, to discover new possibilities, even to discover efficiencies? And are we doing that often enough? And the answer is usually no, because most of us would rather succeed than fail, and most of us would rather keep doing what we're doing because we're kind of good at it. So here's another question along the lines. This is from Mohammed in Pakistan. And this is sort of a classic. And you've thought about this a lot. You've answered this before, but I think your words will be useful for our audience.

31:00So the question is, you know, employees may be hesitant to offer feedback that could be perceived as negative, which can impede professional development, hinder organizational progress. How does one tackle the situation? Such a good question. And it's a good question because it's true. We are very reluctant to do things, to speak up with negative or difficult information, because frankly, it will always be easier not to. It will always be easier to hold back than to speak up candidly and forthrightly about something that you hope could be made better. So the way to make this very difficult thing easier is to set the stage by pointing out how valuable it is.

31:49Periodically, I would say even frequently, refer to the fact that we need to do this hard thing. We need to do it well if we want to be as good as we can, say, as a team, but even individuals who have the ambition to sort of grow and develop in their roles and in their careers have to train themselves to be willing to do this and receive it because of its value. So we've got to call attention to its value. We've got to call attention to the fact that it's hard and then do it anyway and, you know, sort of support each other. So another question, this is from Don from Calgary in Canada. So if it's true that we learn acutely from mistakes, you know, what are some ways to encourage permission from, you know, our leaders who may be risk averse in their constitution?

32:47Sure. And we're all risk averse and maybe leaders even more than others, maybe not. But first of all, I make a distinction between mistakes and failures. Now, I'm not anti-mistake because I'm a human being and I make them. We all do. but a mistake mistake is not the same thing as a failure a failure is something that went wrong that we wish you know wish were otherwise a mistake is a deviation from a known practice now that could happen because of inattention because of lack of training because of exhaustion you name it but it's I think it's it's helpful for leaders and others for that matter to talk about the reality that we will make mistakes, again, because we're human, the very best practice is not to not ever make a mistake.

33:42It's to catch and correct them quickly. And then also to make that distinction between smart experiments and new territory that we also want to see more of because it's the secret to future value creation. And we welcome those too. So then further to that, and here's a question from Benny from California. So what's the best way to speak to subordinates after a failure to kind of boost morale, communicate that this was a good failure, that's okay? You know, I'm going to say honestly, right? So you can be honest about, wow, this was disappointing for all of us, right? And let's get everything we can out of it.

34:28Let's learn as much as possible. And in fact, given that something substantial that goes wrong nearly always has sort of multifaceted aspects to it, it's helpful to have a thoughtful and data-driven conversation about what happened, not who did it, what happened. So we may go around the team sort of, what did you see? And we're really looking for what happened, what contributed to that, and that's both commission and omission, things that you did that may have contributed, things that you didn't do that may have helped. And so it's a thoughtful, deliberately learning-oriented conversation designed to help us be better next time.

35:20Yep. So we've got a little bit more time. And I want to, this is a question for me. And when we were touting this episode, you know, I said I would ask you about how to re-energize your team these days. And we've kind of talked about, you know, that's always a challenge. We've talked about some of the external reasons why maybe people are relatively burned out, maybe productivity is down, et cetera. So what are some thoughts? How do we re-energize our team is particularly now, 2023, where there's a lot of, feels like there's a lot of stuff swirling around. You know, I think it starts with sort of personally taking the time to reconnect with your own sense of purpose for doing the job, the role that you are currently doing.

36:09and consider why it matters to you and why what you are doing or leading matters to the world. And having done that, share it, share it often. And then just as quickly, invite others in to help navigate the necessarily stormy waters that lie ahead. So I think it starts with you And then it's an honest sharing of why you care, why it's challenging, why you very much need and are interdependent with others. Because all of us want to be needed. We want to be needed. We want to matter. Yeah. Well, that's great. I mean, I think this has been a particularly, I don't know, I mean, the last few years, you know, the pandemic, I'd say, certainly in the U.S., increased attention to kind of social issues, which, on the one hand, I think, felt right to people in the workplace.

37:14On the other, you know, brought more sort of challenges into the workplace in terms of what we're thinking about and what we're trying to address. you know one imagines that you know there's a pendulum and it might swing between leadership needing to be very empathetic to I don't know the backlash if that's the right word to you know leaders need to achieve productivity I mean that's what it's all about you know do you believe in that pendulum or are we in a different place and if you do where are we right on that swing So I believe in the pendulum, right? I believe that the pendulum happens. And I believe there may be a better way.

37:56So, you know, it's often thought of as kind of empathy versus productivity. And I looked this up, actually. Productivity is defined as the effectiveness of productive effort as measured in terms of the rate of output per unit of input. Okay. So the first problem is not all work is easily measured for productivity. And the second problem is often it's not the right way to measure excellence. It's a productivity is often a short term measure and it has limited predictive value for the future performance of the firm. Right. For example, one way to be really productive is to just push people to their limits.

38:47But that has time constraints. Eventually they will burn out, leave, etc. It's like Buckminster Fuller used to say it was foolish to burn down the house to keep warm on a cold winter's night. It's kind of, you know, that excessive pressure can be the equivalent of that error. And also innovation work in particular. We have case study after case study where the work actually suffers when productivity metrics are brought to bear. So I guess I, you know, I, in a way, I wish the pendulum were more about excellence that than productivity, because I think productivity is really tricky and variable to measure.

39:32So, you know, maybe I see the pendulum existing, but maybe it's a false dichotomy. You know, maybe it's not empathy versus productivity. Like maybe we need smart, caring leaders who understand the importance of both. and given that that's very challenging, they're open about it being challenging, they're asking for help, they're sharing the burden of caring and excellence with their teams and sort of considering, again, the fundamentals of what it is the organization must do well to stay alive in its market, to perform in its market and talk about it honestly. I mean, I sometimes think we don't talk often enough about the fact that work is work, right?

40:20So it's supposed to be a little bit of work, but that doesn't mean it can't be fun, energizing, collaborative, and full of empathy. Yeah, I love that. Well, maybe that's a good point to end on. So, Amy Edmondson, thank you for being on the show. So thank you for a lot of thoughts, a lot of thoughts about failure, about teams, about psychological safety, about how to lead in tough times. So I know your book is coming out next month or maybe early September. So good luck with the rollout. There's the cover. Amy Edmondson, thank you for being on the show. Thanks for having me. All the best. All right, great.

41:01Right. So that was Amy Edmondson. Thank you for joining. We are doing this live. We're live on LinkedIn. We're live on Facebook. You can watch previous episodes on YouTube and on these platforms, you know, on Facebook and LinkedIn later. So thank you for being with us. Again, if you like this content, if you like hearing smart people talk about some of these issues, urge you to listen to our IdeaCast podcast. That's our flagship. And every week we have interesting conversations with people who are at the leading edge of some aspect of the world of business, the world of work. So our guest next week is going to be Kareem Lakhani.

41:48So it's another Harvard Business School professor. We're not just going to interview Harvard Business School professors, but we have a couple of good ones in consecutive weeks. So Kareem is a specialist in technology and innovation and digital. And I think we'll talk a lot about artificial intelligence and the opportunities and challenges that that creates for all of us. So I want to thank you all for tuning in to The New World of Work. I'm Adi Ignatius. Thanks. See you next week.

42:34Spotify, it's Jay Shetty. Are you one of those media strategy people? Scrolling through spreadsheets, searching for an audience that pays twice as much attention to your ads than they do on social? Let me introduce you to fans. And they're here with me on Spotify. Trust me, I know fans. They don't skip, they stay for hours. They don't move on, they manifest. They're not a demographic group, they're fans. Spotify Advertising. You're among fans. Best thing that's ever happened to you financially. Go. Easy. Sold my car on Carvana. Amazing offer. Really? I hit 200 on the scratcher. Did the scratcher come to your house and hand you a check?

43:15No. How many scratchers did you hit to get that? I hit a button on Carvana.com once. Okay, that's fair. It's like the lottery, except you always win. Not like the lottery at all, actually. Exactly! Inexplicably good! Offers worth bragging about. Sell your car today on Carvana. Pickup fees may apply. Summer's full of reasons to look your best. Tecovis has everything you need to show up in style. Their Western boots are handcrafted in over 200 steps by hand with premium cowhide and exotic leathers. Stop by your local Tecovis store for the full experience. Free drinks, boot shines, and complimentary boot branding to make your pair truly yours.

43:55Their team is there to help you find exactly what fits your summer. And of course, you can always stop by Tecovas.com. Tecovas. Forever West.

From the publisher

It's OK to Fail, but You Have to Do It Right

27 Jul 2023

---

If you're trying new things and not all of them succeed, that's called experimentation. When you deviate from known practice because of inattention or lack of training, on the other hand, that's probably a mistake.

For this episode of our video series “The New World of Work”, HBR editor in chief Adi Ignatius sat down with Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, an expert in psychological safety, to discuss:

+ Good and bad types of failure
+ Dangers of not experimenting enough
+ The tension between paying close attention to individual employees' needs, and those of the team and organization

This interview part of a series called “The New World of Work,” which explores how top-tier executives see the future and how their companies are trying to set themselves up for success. Each week, Adi will interview a leader on LinkedIn Live — and then share an inside look at those conversations and solicit questions for future discussions in a newsletter just for HBR subscribers. If you’re a subscriber, you can sign up for the newsletter here: https://hbr.org/my-library/preferences?movetile=newworldofwork.

Follow us:
https://hbr.org/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-business-review/
https://www.facebook.com/HBR/
https://twitter.com/HarvardBiz
https://www.instagram.com/harvard_business_review

Sign up for Newsletters: https://hbr.org/email-newsletters

#HarvardBusinessReview #NewWorldofWork #Failure #PsychologicalSafety #Work #Business #Psychology #Harvard

Copyright © 2023 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Harvard Business Review

All 539 episodes
It's OK to Fail, but You Have to Do It ProperlyHarvard Business Review · 44 min
Listen in VO