In short
The case for “more muted meetings,” arguing that silence can improve brainstorming and problem-solving.
Guest backgrounds
No guests are mentioned in the transcript.
Key claims
Conventional meetings often cause domination, disengagement, boss-driven pressure, and off-topic drift. Research cited in the episode claims silent meetings generate better ideas for brainstorming/problem solving by creating a safer space for novel, convention-challenging ideas and reducing embarrassment. It also claims silent formats avoid “production blocking,” where people lose chances to speak while waiting their turn.
Notable examples
A suggested process—participants independently write ideas in silence, cluster them, then discuss and vote.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Meeting Landscape
0:31 to 1:08
Explore the prevalence and problems associated with meetings.
“And while there are almost as many different reasons for having a meeting as there are meetings, most still look and sound like this.”
The Case for Silent Meetings
1:09 to 2:32
Discover how silent meetings can enhance brainstorming and idea generation.
“Research has shown that in certain situations, silent meetings actually work better.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:29This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. many meetings there are across the U.S. every single business day. And while there are almost as many different reasons for having a meeting as there are meetings, most still look and sound like this. Talking. And more talking. This time-honored format often does get the job done, but it can also lead to a host of familiar problems. One person might dominate, someone else is checked out, there can be pressure to listen to whatever the boss says, or the whole thing can just stray off course. Fortunately there are alternatives. One sounds like this.
1:13Silence. Research has shown that in certain situations, silent meetings actually work better. Specifically, if the goal of a meeting is to brainstorm or solve a problem, silent meetings have been shown to generate better ideas. But why? Solutions to a problem will often be a novel idea. And novel ideas challenge convention. They can rock the boat and make people feel uncomfortable. But when participants gather around a table and generate written solutions in silence, a safe space is created. Novel ideas can emerge, and people are less afraid of feeling embarrassed. Silent meetings also circumvent negative effects of something called production blocking.
1:59In a conventional meeting, only one person at a time can speak. As you wait your turn, the conversation may shift, and you may lose your opportunity to raise an idea. Silent meetings allow for everyone to express ideas simultaneously. So how do you create a silent brainstorming meeting? Have people write down their ideas independently, then sort them into clusters, discuss, and vote on the ideas that people like. The key is to let the initial ideation phase happen independently and in silence so we can separate egos from ideas. Silence is just one alternative. Since meetings have different goals, there's no reason they all have to look or sound the same.
2:50Thank you.
From the publisher
The Explainer: The Case for More Silent Meetings
2 Dec 2019
---
Talking meetings have much merit, but can also be subject to a host of problems.
There are approximately 55 million meetings a day in the United States. Although they often have many different purposes and goals, these meetings are typically conducted in the same way, time and time again. Namely, individuals gather together, virtually or face-to-face, to talk about a topic. We often don’t realize it, but talk is actually a choice; simply one of many different meeting styles or communication methods a leader can select. While talking meetings have much merit — when planned well they can be efficient and offer a level of comfort in speaking in person — they can also be subject to a host of problems: one person dominating, others checking out and multitasking, side conversations, straying off course, and pressures to conform to the boss’s ideas.
The good news is that alternative approaches do exist and, depending on your task at hand, can work incredibly well. One such approach embraces silence. This technique may seem odd, but current research supports the benefits of holding a “silent meeting” as one way of better leveraging the ideas, perspectives, and insights of organizational talent. Leaders should add it to their toolbox in order to select the right meeting style for the job at hand. At the very least, trying new approaches will serve to keep meetings fresh, engaging, and interesting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
At Harvard Business Review, we believe in management. If the world’s organizations and institutions were run more effectively, if our leaders made better decisions, if people worked more productively, we believe that all of us — employees, bosses, customers, our families, and the people our businesses affect — would be better off. So we try to arm our readers with ideas that help them become smarter, more creative, and more courageous in their work. We enlist the foremost experts in a wide range of topics, including career planning, strategy, leadership, work-life balance, negotiations, innovation, and managing teams. Harvard Business Review empowers professionals around the world to lead themselves and their organizations more effectively and to make a positive impact.
Sign up for Newsletters: https://hbr.org/email-newsletters
Follow us:
https://hbr.org/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-business-review
https://www.facebook.com/HBR/
https://twitter.com/HarvardBiz
https://www.instagram.com/harvard_business_review
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
