The Rush for a Covid-19 Vaccine

7 Jul 2026 · 48 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Status of the COVID-19 vaccine “race,” focusing on Pfizer’s push to develop and scale a vaccine quickly (moonshot timeline), safety/efficacy testing, manufacturing at risk, and global distribution challenges.

Guest backgrounds

Albert Bourla is CEO and chairman of Pfizer (about 1.5 years in role; 25 years at Pfizer). He led a March challenge to his scientists to develop a vaccine in ~6 months instead of a conventional ~18 months.

Key claims

Pfizer will not cut corners on safety; Phase 3 is planned for July with 30,000 participants; efficacy and safety will be statistically tested via vaccine vs placebo outcomes. mRNA platform can speed updates if mutations occur. Pfizer is preparing manufacturing at scale before knowing results to enable immediate rollout if successful. FDA will be fast-tracked and working “day and night.”

Notable examples

Phase 3 design (15 vaccinated/15 placebo per group; larger enrollment to reach significant efficacy faster). Vaccine storage at about minus 80°C for early months, creating infrastructure hurdles in many African countries. Pricing stance: vaccine should be free to individuals with governments paying (no co-pays).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Current State of the COVID-19 Pandemic

0:04 to 0:26

An overview of the pandemic's status and implications for vaccine development.

“It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks.”

Current State of the COVID-19 Pandemic

1:09 to 2:56

An overview of the pandemic's status and implications for vaccine development.

“we're going to be checking in on the status of the race to develop a vaccine.”

Personal Reflections on Risk and Travel

2:56 to 4:29

Hosts discuss their personal attitudes towards travel amid the pandemic.

“how are you processing all this conflicting information, I guess, as a consumer of news, but also as somebody who's mitigating risks in your own life?”

Interview with Albert Bourla

4:31 to 5:30

Introduction and background of Pfizer's CEO and his pandemic experience.

“Again, And Albert Bourla, the CEO and chairman of Pfizer.”

Challenges of Vaccine Development

5:30 to 8:47

Albert Bourla discusses the ambitious timeline and challenges of developing a COVID-19 vaccine.

“So we're going to talk about how that's going.”

Ensuring Vaccine Safety

8:47 to 11:40

Discussion on how Pfizer is ensuring safety in the vaccine development process.

“But I think October is the right time to expect.”

Different Approaches to Vaccine Technology

11:40 to 14:04

Exploration of varying methods in vaccine development between companies.

“So in the testing, you know, my understanding is it's usually the young and the healthy who enrolled in trials, phase two, phase three.”

Different Approaches to Vaccine Technology

14:07 to 14:30

Exploration of varying methods in vaccine development between companies.

“You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new.”

The Race for a COVID-19 Vaccine

14:45 to 21:41

Insights into the process and challenges of developing a COVID-19 vaccine.

“to see if they can create a COVID-19 vaccine.”

Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy

21:41 to 23:27

Discussing public perception and the importance of education on vaccines.

“But if we are successful, I think it is absolutely the right thing to do, and people will remember it.”
Show all 20 chapters

Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy

23:31 to 24:17

Discussing public perception and the importance of education on vaccines.

“But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about ebglis?”

Immunity and Vaccine Rollout

24:26 to 28:00

Exploring immunity from COVID-19 and strategies for vaccine distribution.

“Well, right now, you know, if you test positive and you have the antibodies, I'm curious, what's the latest in your thinking does that mean in terms of immunity?”

Equitable Vaccine Distribution Challenges

28:00 to 30:58

Explore the complexities of COVID-19 vaccine distribution across countries and the infrastructure needs for effective delivery.

“And we will try to see with them to come to the best ways.”

COVID-19 Characteristics Compared to Other Viruses

30:58 to 32:50

Learn about the factors that make COVID-19 transmission and severity different from other respiratory viruses.

“But, you know, the question is getting it like, how does this play out?”

Resource Allocation in Pharma During COVID-19

32:50 to 36:14

Understand how pharmaceutical companies prioritize resources and decision-making amidst the pandemic.

“Albert, so I have a kind of management question for you.”

Ethical Considerations in Vaccine Pricing

36:14 to 38:35

Delve into the ethical aspects of pricing COVID-19 vaccines and the importance of accessibility for all.

“So there's a question from Paul that reflects, you know, as you know, sitting atop a pharma company that people, you know, always will complain that your prices are too high, your price gouging, whatever.”

Fast-Tracking Science and Future Implications

38:35 to 40:52

Examine the potential of applying fast-tracking principles to other medical challenges beyond COVID-19.

“And if by law in some countries they have to charge something to the citizens, we want to take care of it.”

Upcoming Discussion on Global Economy

42:01 to 42:25

Learn about the upcoming conversation focused on global economic challenges.

“Next Tuesday with Kristalina Georgieva, who's the head of the IMF.”

Interconnectedness and Vaccine Development

42:48 to 44:11

Explore the interconnectedness in vaccine development and the role of science.

“This whole herd immunity or whether we all need to commit at some point, we're going to take this thing ultimately down the road for us to really conquer it.”

Big Businesses and Managerial Changes

44:14 to 44:45

Discuss the challenges faced by large corporations and the evolution of management practices.

“And also, you know, The other thing I think will probably take away over time, Adi, is just the lessons of big businesses, these multi-multi-billion-dollar global intergalactic whatever, they can't move.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18+. Propel Fitness Water with Gatorade Electrolytes, zero sugar, and vitamins. Propel hydrates better than water to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self.

0:37What propels you? Propel with Gatorade Electrolytes.

0:51Hi, everyone, and welcome to this week's episode of HBR Quarantined. I'm Adi Ignatius, editor-in-chief of Harvard Business Review. My co-host is Josh Macht, who heads product and innovation for the company. Today, we're going to get back to the subject of COVID-19. Specifically, we're going to be checking in on the status of the race to develop a vaccine. Our special guest this week is Albert Bourla, who is the CEO and chairman of Pfizer, who in March challenged his company scientists to make the impossible possible by developing a vaccine in six months rather than on a more conventional 18-month time frame.

1:31So we're going to talk to him about where Pfizer is on that journey. But before we do that, we want to talk a little bit about the state of the pandemic. It is a very complicated picture these days. At this moment, coronavirus has infected more than 2.2 million people in the U.S. alone, killing more than 120 ,000. Worldwide, the estimate is more than 9 million cases, 470 ,000 deaths. Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, and others in the U.S. are arguing that the pandemic is dying down, that the increases we're seeing in reported cases are mostly because we're testing more people. But there's hard data that would seem to refute that.

2:07The spikes in confirmed cases in many cases in South and the West clearly are not simply a result of increased testing. The percentage of tests that are positive are increasing as well. And in some states, we're seeing increased hospitalizations. The good news is deaths are down, but the rise in cases seems to be affecting more young people than before. And while many, if not most, are likely to stay healthy, they are, of course, carriers. Over the weekend, in a Meet the Press interview, Michael Osterholm, the director of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, put it this way, I don't see this slowing down for the summer or into the fall.

2:43I think this is more like a forest fire. Wherever there's wood to burn, this fire is going to burn it. All of this, of course, heightens the need for a vaccine as soon as possible. And that's what we're going to talk about. But before we do, Josh, how are you processing all this conflicting information, I guess, as a consumer of news, but also as somebody who's mitigating risks in your own life? Yeah, that's the thing. I don't you feel as though I mean, this, this is constant game of figuring out what risks you're willing to take. I'm probably going to be going to Florida at the sometime in August, because my daughter is going to the University of Miami.

3:25Yay. But, you know, they're there, they're the cases are grown, right? That's a state. We're all we're all connected. And we're thinking, okay, I'm traveling. And then if I come back, I mean, how are you? are you starting to even think about travel? And then you have to look at some of these areas where the cases are on the rise and think twice. Yeah, I've turned down every kind of travel opportunity, conference opportunity. You know, we're doing them all remotely now. I have a son who's in college in California. He's thinking very seriously about not going this semester because it's going to be such a strange, you know, a lot of the, a lot of the classes will still be done remotely, and it's just not the same scene.

4:06So I don't know. I guess I'm not quite ready to reenter the world. I mean, that's, I guess, why we're excited to have this conversation today, because it feels as though between medicines and vaccines, we still have a distance to go of, you know, what we've been living through. Maybe not as severe, but we got quite a few more shows ahead of us, I think. So let's get to it. So it's our pleasure to introduce today's guest. Again, And Albert Bourla, the CEO and chairman of Pfizer. He's been Pfizer's CEO for about a year and a half. He's been with the company for 25 years. Again. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome.

4:44You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies 18 plus. Propel Fitness Water with Gatorade electrolytes, zero sugar and vitamins. Propel hydrates better than water to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self.

5:18What propels you? Propel with Gatorade electrolytes. He challenged his scientific team to aim for a moonshot to have millions of doses of vaccine in the hands of the population before the end of the year. So we're going to talk about how that's going. So, Albert, welcome. And let me ask, where are you now and what has your life been during the pandemic?

5:39Albert Bourla:Thank you very much. I'm home. I have a small place that I used to be maybe once per week, and now I'm every day there. And this is from where I try to connect and run the company. My home is in Westchester in Scarborough, so I'm in New York. So that's Pfizer worldwide headquarters now. I don't know about that, but definitely it is an important part of Pfizer's management here. Adi was talking a little bit about the moonshot that you've called for, going to, can we do this in something like six months? But talk to us about, I mean, it's hard to get your head around when we hear that vaccines are so difficult to create.

6:26They take a lot of time. There's a lot of potential pitfalls. Talk to us a little bit about how you can put out such a bold, ambitious idea to shoot for.

6:36Albert Bourla:First of all, look, the vaccines, there are vaccines that are very difficult to make, and there are vaccines that are much easier to make. The truth is that from the known diseases, all the easy to make vaccines have already been made. And what remains right now are very difficult diseases that so far the technology wouldn't allow us to develop a solution. When it comes to COVID-19, we still don't know if it is easy or difficult to make a vaccine because this is the first time that we tried. But the truth is that to try to do something in six, nine months, which is if we can bring a vaccine by October, for example, will mean something like that.

7:12Albert Bourla:While it needs not 18 months, as you said before, but the typical needs many years to be done. Something has never been done before and you need to do things very differently to accomplish it. Let me invite our viewers to submit your questions as well for Albert. We'll try to take a bunch of questions from you. So put them into the comments box and we'll try to get to some of your questions. Albert, just to follow up on that, you know, it almost feels like the timeline for a vaccine is an article of faith. I mean, if you look at Ken Frazier of Merck, who's another smart pharma CEO, you know, he said publicly that even a 12 to 18 month outlook is probably too optimistic.

7:53So how do you account for the difference of opinion between between yourself and Ken? Is it is a personality or is it is it about science?

8:01Albert Bourla:Not at all. I know Ken, and he's a wonderful manager, and I'm sure he knows well what he's doing. In our case, I realize that it's going to be difficult, and I realize that it's going to be almost in the spectrum of impossible. That's why I said the famous phrase in this email that I sent to people, I know I'm asking you to do the impossible possible. But I will tell you something. When we started that, my question was if we are going to have a vaccine. And now, several months down the road, after I have seen a lot of data, my question is when we are going to have a vaccine. So I'm not sure we will have it in October.

8:38Albert Bourla:This is what we are shooting for. But I'm much more optimistic that we will have a vaccine by year end or around that. But I think October is the right time to expect. Wow. Okay, so talk to us a little bit about the safety issues, because we think of these things, too, or at least I do. I think of them as taking time because it just takes a while to usually go from high doses to figure out what's the right dosage and what's the safety and efficacy. And you learn over time. How are you ensuring that safety piece when we could be there in October? Well, the FDA has already made known their intentions, which is no.

9:23This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+. Propel Fitness Water. With Gatorade electrolytes, zero sugar, and vitamins, Propel hydrates better than water. to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self.

10:00What propels you? Propel with Gatorade electrolytes.

10:03Albert Bourla:This will be cut. And frankly, irrelevant what FDA or EMA was going to say, Pfizer was never going to cut corners because we are a company of 170 years of existence. I repeat, 170, and I plan to continue for many more. So our reputation is extremely important. The product, the vaccine, will be tested in thousands of people. Actually, it will be tested in the high end of what a vaccine will go through a testing to be approved. We are expecting that we will launch a phase three study pretty soon, in July, that will involve 30 ,000 people, 3-0. and there are not many studies nor vaccine studies that they are recruiting those many people in fact the reason why we are recruiting those many people 30 000 and not go to five six seven eight thousand but for safety reasons fda would be would be comfortable it is because we want by having a lot of people to be able to more quickly come to statistical significant result in the efficacy because we vaccinate those 30 people, 15 will get the vaccine, 1 ,000, 15 will get the placebo, and then eventually we are waiting to see events if those people are getting sick.

11:29Albert Bourla:And then at the same point, we will see that that many got sick in the vaccine and that many got sick in the placebo, and there's a significant difference between those two groups that is statistically significant. The more people you engage in the study, the quicker this result will come. That's the only reason why we do it. Gotcha. So in the testing, you know, my understanding is it's usually the young and the healthy who enrolled in trials, phase two, phase three. How do you design trials then to make sure you're going to have significant evidence about a vaccine's protection for the most vulnerable, you know, the elderly in this case?

12:05Albert Bourla:In the original phases, in the very early stages of our program, which we call it phase one, we started with the younger people. and then the people was 18 to 55. And then after we've proven that the vaccine is safe for them, then we moved to, not proven, but we saw that we didn't have any side effects, then we moved to a group of 60 to 85 years old. So now already we are in both groups. In terms of, just to understand, side effects, you can have multiple side effects, but the most common for vaccines are headaches, or pain in the injection site or redness, could be fever. And we want to make sure that all of these are minimal.

12:50And usually younger people, they are much more expressing those symptoms

12:56Albert Bourla:much more profound way than older people because their immune system, it is less active and robust as the younger people typically. But of course we want that also the product works. So we want to make sure that it gives enough immunity that will prevent the disease or the symptoms of the disease to the degree possible also for older people. But we are doing both. Albert, can you explain? It seems to me, at least from what I've been seeing, that there are varying approaches to this vaccine. But in general, some, and I think Merck, are trying to use things like the measles vaccine or older technologies.

13:41It seems as though in the idea that they maybe know more about it, even in terms of manufacturing. So when you get all the way to that point, you can move quickly. It seems that others like Moderna and I think Pfizer as well are working with newer technologies. Is that, how is that, does that roughly break out that way?

13:59Albert Bourla:I think that America is a very good platform. This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18+. Propel Fitness Water with Gatorade Electrolytes, zero sugar, and vitamins.

14:34Propel hydrates better than water to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self. What propels you? Propel with Gatorade Electrolytes.

14:44Albert Bourla:I think they announced that they will engage their platform to see if they can create a COVID-19 vaccine. And it is important that when you embark into a study that you need results, strong results, and you need them quickly, a lot of things can go wrong in manufacturing. It's not simple to manufacture a vaccine. So you need to have end-to-end capabilities from early research to mid-research to all the way to manufacturing and distributing because vaccines distribution is a very different type of animal that will allow you to feel comfortable. Ourselves, for example, you are right that the mRNA technology, but also you're right, Moderna is using, is a technology that hasn't produced yet a vaccine, but it is a technology that is not unfamiliar to us.

15:30Albert Bourla:With BioNTech, we are collaborating in this technology since 2018. So we had two years' experience with this technology. And our collaboration was not to develop a COVID-19 vaccine, but was to develop a flu vaccine. A flu vaccine that could disrupt basically the flu market because this technology has the benefit that you can very quickly, from the time that you sequence the virus, move into production. So if you know the sequence of the virus, you can move very quickly to the production. This is not the same with other technologies. It could take months or what you can do now in weeks. So we felt comfortable that this is the right technology, and we jumped.

16:13Albert Bourla:But there is no doubt I had a lot of anxiety that we are taking significant risk because it has never been done. That's why I said that if the stars are aligned, we could have, if the plan is executed without the surprises, we could have data in October timeframe that we will feel comfortable that we have a good vaccine, safe, efficacious, and FDA will feel comfortable. and I'm surprised to tell you the truth but still the stars are aligned so so far we have already we are let's say one third half the way between one third and half the way and things are still on plan let me take a couple questions from our audience we're getting a lot of good questions this is from well alright let's take this one from Charles from Toronto so if a vaccine you know if this is achieved in six months, could it eliminate a second and possible third wave of corona infections?

17:13Albert Bourla:I don't know. First of all, we need to see what would be the level of efficacy of the vaccine. No vaccine or very few vaccines are 100 % efficacious. Flu vaccines are 40%, for example, typically. But there are other vaccines that we are having that could be 90 plus percent efficacious. We need to see how efficacious it is. We need to see also what will be the strategy of vaccinating. But the hope is, yes, that you can vaccinate very big parts of the population so you can create herd immunity so that your population is immune. And when a very big part of your population is immune, you can break down the transmission circle.

17:52Albert Bourla:But all of that needs to be proved. You need to prove the efficacy, and then we need to make sure that we don't have any surprises in the well-known theory that when you create herd immunity, then the transmission is breaking down. So here's a follow-up. This is from Sourav in Miami. So what's the plan for vaccination after virus mutations take place? How do you respond to that? Yeah. I don't know if this virus is subject to a lot of mutations. From information that we have will mutate that's for sure but i don't know how how fast could take a few years but this is exactly why this technology the mrna technology is ideal you don't need to redesign the vaccine all you need to do it is if there is a new mutation you take the sequence of the new the i mean the dna sequence of the new this episode is brought to you by google chrome You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new.

18:51It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+. Propel Fitness Water. With Gatorade electrolytes, zero sugar, and vitamins, Propel hydrates better than water. to help you get the most out of your workout and get back to your best self. What propels you? Propel with Gatorade Electrolytes.

19:26Albert Bourla:Vaccine, and within days, you can prepare new templates that could replace the core of your vaccine. So this is why we wanted to do it with flu, because flu mutates very often, actually every year. Every year is a very different strain. And that's why we thought it is ideal for that. So if this will be the case and the virus mutates, this technology will be able to follow up very quickly. But I'm not sure that will be the case. Are you, Albert, with, you know, you talked a little bit about manufacturing, and it seems as though the major players that are in this game are setting up, prepared to manufacture at scale.

20:03But does that mean rewriting the rules between how you go from the lab to manufacturing? Are you doing things in just a very different way that could change the game permanently going forward?

20:13Albert Bourla:Completely different game. Completely different way of doing things. we have let me start from the day one we started with Moderna for example with excuse me with BioNTech for example we didn't sign a contract we called them you want to be yes they called us yes we want to be we started exchanging information confidential we started putting plans together we started spending money without contract and then as we were doing that we signed a letter of intent and then only after that we signed a contract so So that's untypical, right? You don't want before you spend to be safe. Then we started doing things in parallel, non-sequential.

20:53Albert Bourla:I will tell you the biggest risk element. It is that you prepare your manufacturing and you're going to manufacture tens of millions or hundreds of millions of doses or prepare to manufacture hundreds of millions of doses, which means you buy all the materials and you set up the lines in your manufacturing site without knowing if the vaccine works. What this risk-taking gives you is if the vaccine works and it is approved, then you have already the quantities manufactured so that you can immediately jump and vaccinate people. But if it doesn't work, it means you need to write off all this investment.

21:32Albert Bourla:And this is big money. But that was the only way that you can do it. And I don't think that a company of our size will break if we lose$1 or$2 billion. But if we are successful, I think it is absolutely the right thing to do, and people will remember it. So we've all seen the statistics that seem to show that a large percentage of the U.S. population, and maybe 30 percent according to one study, say they won't take the vaccine even when it's developed, which is incredible to me. So how do you anticipate that problem? How do we reassure the public and improve messaging, you know, to make sure there's a significant eventual uptake when there is a vaccine?

22:18Albert Bourla:I think that the key opinion leaders of this country, which is prominent scientists, the CDC, Dr. Fauci, multiple other people, they need to basically to make a campaign. they've been to make an educational campaign to explain to people why they should get vaccination and that it is safe and what you should expect and that it is going to protect them because otherwise there will be a percentage of people that either will think that if it is done so quickly likely they don't know if it is safe so let me be not the first one to get vaccinated or they will say that it was pressed by political reasons to get the vaccine out there.

23:05Albert Bourla:So there will be a lot of that. Now, from my perspective, I know that I will, no matter what pressures, we will not put out a vaccine unless Pfizer scientists feel that it is safe and efficacious. And from all my interactions with FDA, I don't think they intend to cut corners as well. But still, there will be people that will doubt. Hey, it's Kelly Rowland. You may not know this, but I have eczema, so I get how it can steal your time. But why let eczema take over when you can talk to your doctor about ebglis? Ebglis, Lubrikizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per two milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema, also called atopic dermatitis that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals or who cannot use topical therapies.

Read the full transcript

23:58EBCLIS can be used with or without topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you are allergic to EBCLIS. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. Eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with EBCLIS. Before starting EBCLIS, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. Paid partnership with Lilly. Respect your time. Ask your doctor about EBCLIS and visit EBCLIS.com or call 1-800-LILY-RX or 1-800-545-5979.

24:26Albert Bourla:There is a need for education. Well, right now, you know, if you test positive and you have the antibodies, I'm curious, what's the latest in your thinking does that mean in terms of immunity? And, you know, do you then you're okay, you know, you won't even need the vaccine. it's interesting because I was I was reading today some information that I think was coming from Stanford but don't hold me to that the immunity that people are developing sometimes goes away and there are emerging data of this is happening but I don't know, we don't know for how long, first of all if they are completely protected those people and for how long but what What we know very well from a study that Mayo Clinic has published is that when you use convalescent serum, which means blood serum from blood of people that they had disease, and then you take this and you clean it, and then you take the antibodies basically that the individuals have developed, and you treat people that they are sick, you have reductions in mortality and you have better outcomes for the patients, particularly when it is early.

25:44Albert Bourla:The earlier you treat them, the better the results. This is a very good surrogate, let's say, end point that if your vaccines can generate immune responses similar to those that they got the virus, there are good chances that they could be protected. Now, if your vaccine generates higher than those that are taking the virus natural, theoretically, again, it should be even higher, the possibilities that you are protected. But that can only be proven with this 30 ,000 people study, that you don't use the theory of the case, but you use, indeed, that many people got the disease, that many didn't get the disease between the two groups.

26:36So let's go to a few questions. Again, if you're watching this, this is HBR Quarantine. We're interviewing Albert Bourla, who's the CEO of Pfizer. We're talking about the race to develop a vaccine. If you have questions for him, please put them in the comments box. So let me go to a few questions now, one by one. A lot of interest in how the vaccine might be rolled out. So here are a couple of questions. Would the vaccine be rolled out to certain parts of the community first, like high risk areas? Would a vaccine be available internationally? And how would you retain IP on it? And then how would you be planning on helping poorer countries pay for it?

27:13So those questions are from Timothy in New Hampshire and from Vusi from Johannesburg.

27:18Albert Bourla:Yeah, great questions, all of them. And I think these are very high in my mind. And not in all of these questions I have control on the answer. For example, how the product will be used. I think it is coming more health authorities of each country and how they would recommend the product to be used rather than us to say use first in first responders or use secondly to or to people that are working in the food industry or the people that are in hospitals. So this is something that we still, though, start engaging into discussions with the CDC here, with other health authorities from other governments, because all the governments of the world are calling us right now to basically procure the vaccine.

28:02Albert Bourla:And we will try to see with them to come to the best ways. But I think they will be their call. Now, the second question, who gets it not within a country, but how we distribute basically the vaccine between countries. Also, it's a very hot potato because we know that we will produce a lot, hundreds of millions, but likely the demand will be higher than the offer right now. So you need to find an equitable way that you distribute this product. And we already created two separate supply lines to avoid, let's say, conflicts for the U.S. and for Europe. And we did that because this is where we had our manufacturing plants that they could engage in producing a vaccine.

28:57Albert Bourla:So in the U.S., we have three manufacturing sites that will do that. We will start in St. Louis, Missouri, and then they will go to do the templates. Then we'll do drug substance in Antover in Massachusetts. And then we will move to Kalamazoo in Michigan, where the hundreds of millions, basically, doses could be vile. And in Europe, we have in Belgium and in Germany similar facilities. But of course, Europe and the US is not the whole world. There are other countries, developed countries like Japan, Korea, you name it. And also non-developed countries like African countries. And that's a challenge.

29:32Albert Bourla:And we are working, for example, we had a lot of discussions with not only us, other, let's say, biopharmaceutical companies with Bill Gates Foundation and how we can create a channel for these countries. one of the biggest challenges is not how to allocate doses for Africa, for example. It is how you make sure that the infrastructure, that the doses will reach the patients are in place. And I will tell you why, because, of course, we do multiple vaccinations in Africa. It's not for the first time that we will do it. But this vaccine, at least in the first six to nine months, will need to be maintained in minus 80 degrees.

30:19Albert Bourla:This is something that we've accomplished easy with some basic infrastructure that exists in the developed world. But I'm not sure that every African country, for example, will have the infrastructure to do something like that so that they can keep the doses without being destroyed from high temperatures until there is the patient. So all of that is work. We are working how that will go as we are working to make sure that the vaccine will be available. But I have no doubts that at the end, troubles will come because it's very difficult to please everyone. Help us. So this is a question for Vikas in the Bengaluru area of India.

31:02But, you know, the question is getting it like, how does this play out? I mean, the distribution challenge once we come up with a vaccine will be so massive, probably require public, private, non-government funding. Will it essentially be that one approach will win out and that will be the standard? Or will we have many vaccine solutions for COVID-19?

31:29Albert Bourla:I hope we will have many. And right now we know that there are five or six companies. And I think three of them likely a little bit ahead of the other ones. But, you know, months ahead, not a big deal. And I hope that all the first wave, the three, and all of the others will be successful eventually, because for the reasons that we just mentioned, that there will be billions of doses if, what a lot of experts are saying, this virus is not going anywhere. If that's the case, vaccine will be, I think, the ultimate solution. So I hope everybody will be successful. There's another question, let's see, from Rhonda in New York.

32:10And the question is, what are some of the most difficult or confusing aspects of COVID-19, of this virus, that make it different and maybe more challenging than other flu-like diseases?

32:23Albert Bourla:You know, I'm not an expert, and I'm not Dr. Fauci, but I guess there are two things that are higher than other respiratory viruses. One, it is transmitted very easily from one to another, much easier than with other viruses. And secondly, it can have much more severe symptoms. So it can lead to death much more often than other viruses. So the combination of the two is what made it that explosion. Albert, so I have a kind of management question for you. We are, after all, a management magazine and website. So I'm curious. Chris, you're clearly having to spend a lot of time and energy and move the company towards as the world is looking at this.

33:12But you are a big company with a lot of other things going on. How are you, first of all, just helping people to stay, you know, you have a lot of people who aren't working on these things. You must be having to make difficult decisions as you divert more and more resources into this. So how do you make sure that if you're not on this project, you're still on something important? Because that's a common thing with all companies.

33:37Albert Bourla:You are absolutely right. It's a common thing with all companies, and even more importantly, for pharmaceutical companies. Because the resources that are not infinite could go out of a cancer research project, or of another vaccine research project, or something that has to do with the health of the people. and also I have to say that a lot of decisions needs to be made for things that we have never done before and those things some of them are clearly driven by science but a lot of them is driven by management decisions for example the science could tell you I think this is the best vaccine we have maybe we move to 30 ,000 people without one but I can have another could be even better but in three months what are you doing are you going for the much better but three months later so when could be late because a second wave comes and is devastating for the world or you take your bet and you say let's go with that and I think that we have enough evidence that this is good enough

34:51That makes a lot of sense. Do you think about that in the context of all of the different projects going on, so that in terms of there's diversity of approaches? No.

35:02Albert Bourla:I have to say that for all the projects that we're doing in vaccines, yes, because we started with four different vaccines, and we are trying to come to one, but we will scale up. So this is the process that we're doing right now. And this is why I'm saying they can tell me let's go without or let's wait three months to know maybe another one that could be better. But I have to say that at this stage, I put disproportionately weight and effort on COVID. I think delaying, let's say, a month a cancer medicine is terrible for the people, but it's not the same like delaying two or three months vaccine solution for COVID that could be devastating for the world and the economy and everything.

35:43Albert Bourla:So we try to make sure that we move everything in parallel but when it comes to COVID vaccine, the decision was from day one. There is no ROI that will drive our decision. We didn't put how much it's going to cost us, how much it's going to produce. It was only our own effort, return on effort. So if people were feeling that if we put effort and the resources there, we will have a result, we went and we did. So very disproportional efforts on COVID right now. from ours. So there's a question from Paul that reflects, you know, as you know, sitting atop a pharma company that people, you know, always will complain that your prices are too high, your price gouging, whatever.

36:27This is Paul from Canada specifically is asking, what are your plans regarding profit from this vaccine?

36:33Albert Bourla:I was, you know, I never thought about the price of vaccine because as I said, the whole process was very atypical. We didn't say if we invest in this case we're going to make a product where this is good and that will be the price typically for a good product and this is how I want to make but I started thinking about the price because everybody's calling and asking to place pre-orders for a vaccine so if we do the typical type of assessment about the vaccine which is what is the cost effectiveness of the vaccine I mean what if everybody does, what is the benefit, the financial or health benefit that the society will achieve?

37:16Albert Bourla:We will get to astronomical numbers, because obviously this is a disease that has paralyzed the economy of the world, trillions of costs. So we cannot use something like that, that would be completely unethical. If we go and completely exclude these economic considerations, but we go to a price that only accounts for what will be cost-effectiveness for the system, for example, if you vaccinate everyone, how much cost to the government to vaccinate everyone, and how much cost will save because people will not go to the hospitals. Again, you go to very, very high prices because a lot of people are going to the hospitals.

37:51Albert Bourla:And so we decided that it's very challenging under these conditions to price it under normal free market, let's say, type of cost benefit. So I'm leaning towards that we will just price it like any of our other vaccines, and particularly in the pandemic, to facilitate governments. We will do it with heavy discounts, for example. But for me, there's one only term that should be free to people. So there should be no co-pays. There should be no participation of the individual if we give it to these reduced prices. to the individual citizens. And if by law in some countries they have to charge something to the citizens, we want to take care of it.

38:42Albert Bourla:We will cover it. We will pay for the citizens. That's my only term. So it should be free for all people and it should be only governments that will pay. And frankly, governments that are of very high GDP should pay higher than governments of very low GDP, like Africa, that should pay virtually nothing. So I just have one more question, and I want to come back to this whole concept of the moonshot, the challenge that you've thrown to your scientists to get this done super quickly. I guess the question is, does science work that way? Can you just sort of declare a fast track and throw money at it and get results?

39:20And if it does, you know, should we take this approach to all of the other seemingly intractable challenges that we have in health and society?

39:31Albert Bourla:Yeah, this last thought that you have is very high in my mind. And I was discussing also with our scientists of if indeed we can make it with COVID, why only COVID? Why wouldn't we be able to implement those principles to other projects that we do? And I think some of them we will be able. And I think that the positive experience will be a catalyst to be able to develop solutions faster. some of them required also of course collaboration of the FDA just to give you an idea typically we submit between phases our results of the first phase to FDA and then gives you permission to move to the second because they need to check this and that and that because thousands of studies are happening in the world there is a timeline for FDA so they need a long time to come back to you, right?

40:25Albert Bourla:With COVID, they just work day and night and they come to be very quick. I don't think it's feasible always, although we should discuss it with them if they need more resources. But also the collaboration of the FDA that they work day and night when it comes to COVID to make sure that they give you an answer if they approve or not quickly plays also a significant role. But many other things I think can happen that we can accelerate the timelines of other products in general, medicines. Albert, this has been pretty fascinating. We can't thank you enough for taking time to, out of what's clearly a very busy and important schedule.

41:05Albert Bourla:I always wanted to be interviewed by the Harvard Business Review. Can you come back anytime? No, no, I made it. Yes, I do think. We made it. We always wanted the Pfizer CEO. We can die in peace. Sometimes I forget that I am. Well, we would love to have you back, especially as you learn more and more about this. But I do want to say a special thanks for stopping by, and we look forward to talking with you soon. Thank you very much. And I will leave you with one thought. I don't know if we will have a vaccine, but I'm very optimistic. And I'm optimistic because I believe in science, and I think science will win.

41:44All right.

41:44Albert Bourla:Well, I hope you're right. That's a great one to end on. Thanks very much, Albert. Thank you very much. Bye-bye. Cheers. And thank you to everyone who watched today our show. We are going to be back next week. Actually, Adi, I want to make sure. Next Tuesday. Next Tuesday with Kristalina Georgieva, who's the head of the IMF. We're going to be talking a little bit about the global economy. Clearly, there's a lot going on in terms of how it is that we're paying for everything and what that means going forward for our local and global economy. So we look forward to having that conversation and seeing you soon.

42:48well that was interesting and we're back and we're back so that show featured my dog barking I was wondering I thought it was his okay I have to say though it's so interesting to see making for a CEO to say as he was saying even before we went on air if something like this this changes your whole life in terms of being involved with a project like this for sure but it also reminded me the whole thing of how interconnected we all are. This whole herd immunity or whether we all need to commit at some point, we're going to take this thing ultimately down the road for us to really conquer it. It's just fascinating.

43:44Yeah. And it'll be interesting to see if challenging people to go quickly, throwing more money at them achieves results. At the end of the day, he basically said he doesn't know if he's going to develop a vaccine, but that he's optimistic because he's optimistic in science. And, you know, there are other people in his industry who have all the same faith in science and have a less rosy timetable than he does. So, you know, let's hope he's right. Let's hope some of these, you know, a lot of people working on this now, there's a lot of money being spent on this now. Let's hope that someone's getting close.

44:14And also, you know, The other thing I think will probably take away over time, Adi, is just the lessons of big businesses, these multi-multi-billion-dollar global intergalactic whatever, they can't move. And then it's just like now it's like, wait, we're going to work without a contract. We don't care. We're just starting to manufacture even though we have no idea what we're manufacturing. And it just sort of shows you that these behemoths – I mean I think that's going to be rewriting a lot of the managers. playbook going forward. It could be. All right. I probably have to walk my dog now. I was going to start.

44:52Yeah. It sounds like something's tearing apart. All right. Cool. So we'll see you guys. All right. See you guys later. Good job, Dave. Good job. Okay. Bye.

45:17Thank you.

From the publisher

The Race for a Covid-19 Vaccine

23 Jun 2020

---

The CEO of Pfizer says his company is working to get a vaccine to the masses as quickly as possible — including those in disadvantaged and vulnerable communities.

This video was recorded live on June 22, 2020. In March, Pfizer's CEO and chairman, Albert Bourla, called on company scientists to come up with a “moonshot”: develop a vaccine within 6 months instead of the more-standard 18-month period. Does science work that way? Can you speed things up just by calling for it all to happen more quickly?

---------------------------------------------------------------------

At Harvard Business Review, we believe in management. If the world’s organizations and institutions were run more effectively, if our leaders made better decisions, if people worked more productively, we believe that all of us — employees, bosses, customers, our families, and the people our businesses affect — would be better off. So we try to arm our readers with ideas that help them become smarter, more creative, and more courageous in their work. We enlist the foremost experts in a wide range of topics, including career planning, strategy, leadership, work-life balance, negotiations, innovation, and managing teams. Harvard Business Review empowers professionals around the world to lead themselves and their organizations more effectively and to make a positive impact.

Sign up for Newsletters: https://hbr.org/email-newsletters

Follow us:
https://hbr.org/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-business-review/
https://www.facebook.com/HBR/
https://twitter.com/HarvardBiz
https://www.instagram.com/harvard_business_review

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Harvard Business Review

All 539 episodes
The Rush for a Covid-19 VaccineHarvard Business Review · 48 min
Listen in VO