Bitcoin and the Banking Crisis w/ Jeff Dorman

27 May 2023 · 1 h 3 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Raoul Pal: The Journey Man - Bitcoin and the Banking Crisis w/ Jeff Dorman

Podcast Details

  • Title: Raoul Pal: The Journey Man
  • Episode Title: Bitcoin and the Banking Crisis w/ Jeff Dorman
  • Date: May 3, 2023
  • Description: Jeff Dorman, CIO of Arca, discusses the implications of the ongoing banking crisis and why he remains optimistic about Bitcoin. The episode delves into topics such as ETH staking, regulatory challenges, and the future of the crypto industry.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Banking Crisis and Bitcoin's Relevance
  2. The banking crisis has highlighted the importance of Bitcoin as a bearer asset.
  3. Jeff notes that Bitcoin's narrative has evolved, especially during the recent banking turmoil, as more individuals reconsider asset safety.
  4. There’s a shift in perception regarding traditional bank accounts as the safest places for assets, with Bitcoin becoming more strongly valued post-crisis.
  1. Changing Asset Safety Rankings
  2. Before the crisis, individuals ranked assets in terms of safety as follows:
  3. U.S. Bank Accounts
  4. Money Markets/Brokerage Accounts
  5. Cash
  6. Stablecoins
  7. Bitcoin
  8. Post-crisis, the order shifted, with Bitcoin rising in safety perception due to its non-reliance on banking institutions.
  1. Bitcoin as a Protective Asset
  2. Jeff discusses Bitcoin's volatility but emphasizes its role as protection against central bank interventions.
  3. Bitcoin is viewed as a long-tailed call option on financial stability, where its value could rise significantly if confidence in traditional financial systems collapses.
  1. Market Behavior and Regulation
  2. Observations on how U.S. regulations are impacting the crypto market and how global activity is potentially shifting away from the U.S.
  3. Consensus indicates that digital asset investing is perceived as dead, yet market behaviors contradict this, showing resilience and growth, notably in Bitcoin's case.
  1. Impact of ETH Staking
  2. The introduction of ETH staking and liquidity in staking has made holding ETH more attractive for passive investors.
  3. Predictions suggest that staking rates could lead to a significant increase in staked ETH, enhancing Ethereum's overall value proposition.
  1. NFTs and Their Evolution
  2. NFTs are seen as evolving beyond digital art and collectibles into practical applications such as decentralized identity and ownership of real-world assets.
  3. Jeff highlights potential applications in gaming and healthcare, where NFTs could revolutionize ownership and access.
  1. Risk and Opportunity in Crypto Markets
  2. Jeff identifies various risks, including the concentration risk in the derivatives market, particularly concerning Binance.
  3. He also mentions court cases involving Ripple and others as potential catalysts for upside opportunities in the market.
  1. Future of Layer 1 Blockchains
  2. Discussion on alternative layer 1 blockchains and their niche markets.
  3. Emphasis on the need for unique value propositions for these blockchains to exist alongside Ethereum.

Conclusion

  • The conversation highlights a shifting landscape in the crypto and banking sectors, with Bitcoin and Ethereum at the forefront of discussions around safety, regulation, and market evolution.
  • Jeff Dorman’s perspectives provide a nuanced view, balancing optimism for the future of digital assets while remaining aware of potential risks and market dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin's value is increasingly recognized as a safe haven amidst banking instability.
  • Regulatory challenges in the U.S. are pushing innovation and activity to other global markets.
  • The evolution of ETH staking may redefine investment strategies within the crypto ecosystem.
  • NFTs are poised for significant growth in practical applications beyond digital art.
  • Market disruptions may open doors for new opportunities and innovations in the crypto space.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Your favorite neighborhood spot grows with Square. Indeed, my favorite neighborhood spot has quickly become Todd Snyder in Williamsburg. Todd Snyder is one of my favorite menswear shops and has supplied me with all the clothes I have needed this quite hot summer. Every business has different goals, but Square is the business platform that supports them all. From opening a new location, selling something new, or just expanding their reach. Indeed, I've seen it with Todd Snyder. In Square, also, you can get real-time insights, so don't wait for end-of-day reports. Go to square.com forward slash go forward slash realvision to learn more about how your business can grow with Square.

0:43That's S-Q-U-A-R-E dot com slash G-O slash R-E-A-L-B-I-S-I-O-N.

0:57Hey, everyone. If you like this podcast, go behind the paywall to get privileged access to the smartest minds in finance. Join the Real Vision community and learn how to become a better investor. Visit realvision.com slash RVpod and use the promo code podcast10. That's podcast10 to get 10 % off our essential membership for the first year. Now to the top analysis of today's crypto markets. the one thing i love about these conversations that i have in rails of interest in crypto is i get to speak to everybody in the space all different participants whether it's brands building in the space whether it's protocols whether it's even media people whether it's artists and also the hedge funds and jeff dorman is one of my favorite people to chat to because he, like myself, has a traditional finance background and he has a particular perspective that I think is immensely valuable for people to understand.

1:54And I haven't caught up with Jeff for a while. So I thought we'd all catch up together and let's see. I'm sure we're going to have a great conversation with Jeff Dorman and myself. The world of crypto is an incredibly exciting journey that we're all going on together. We don't know where it's leading to, but we know is going to be absolutely massive. Join me, Raoul Pal, as I guide you on our adventure to discover just what this new world will look like. Jeff Dorman, good to see you back, my friend. Great to see you. Thanks for having me. So a lot's happened since we last spoke. And you've been around the block a while and seen a lot of this before.

2:33What's your current state of affairs top level in the crypto markets? How are you thinking about things? Well, first and foremost, I mean, I think a lot of people thought that I was anti-Bitcoin for a number of years because I haven't talked about it much. Bitcoin up until the last three months really has been pretty boring, certainly relative to the growth of stable coins and DeFi and NFTs and Layer 2s and other areas within the Ethereum ecosystem. But this year has been 100 % Bitcoin and for real reason. I mean, I think the last time Bitcoin, in my opinion, was interesting was only because a few new people were buying it, right?

3:11Like, you know, a few corporations like Tesla, you know, big fund managers like, you know, Paul Tudor Jones back in 2020. But there was nothing really new to the narrative of Bitcoin up until this year. But I think this year, you know, whether you just look at a graph of the, you know, regional banking ETF, KRE versus Bitcoin, where you just think intuitively about why Bitcoin as a bearer asset is so important And this has been monumental, in my opinion. I mean, this is the biggest full-blown Bitcoin narrative that we've seen in certainly five years. Yeah, I never forget. I mean, I first got into Bitcoin having gone through exactly this in the European crisis in 2012 and realizing that there were no bearer assets and your money was not a bearer asset either.

4:02And that's when I discovered Bitcoin. And here it is in the United States playing out. and Europe as well, with Credit Suisse going under, with people starting to realize the true value of what this is all about. Yeah, and I remember very vividly that Friday, I think it was March 10th, obviously, people here at ARCA, for the entire weekend, we were talking about where are our assets safe between the different brokerage accounts we had, the different bank accounts, stable coins, everything that was related to what was happening. And to the Fed and the FDIC and the Treasury's credit, they worked very quickly and swiftly to stop what could have been much bigger.

4:41But even just that three to four days, I talked to five small business owners that had nothing to do with digital assets over those four days. And they were legitimately asking me, like, am I going to be able to make payroll? What's going to happen when the banks open on Monday? And that's a really scary feeling for people. And I think prior to March, most people would rank in terms of just pure safety of assets. they would have had U.S. bank accounts at the top, right? And then probably below that would be money markets and brokerage accounts. Below that would be cash under your mattress, then stable coins, then something like Bitcoin.

5:14I think post the events of the first two weeks of March, there was a real re-rating there. And clearly, assets in a bank account is just not number one anymore. Even though, again, you have implicit, if not fully explicit, insurance now from the government, it still doesn't feel safe, especially when you know that you're earning nothing on those assets relative to what you can earn in a money market. Stablecoins don't even feel all that safe, right? Because most stablecoins are backed by assets in a bank, and you never know when that's going to be shut down. So you have to start re-ranking, like, if I just want to hold on to my assets and know that I have them, I think number one is now a money market in a brokerage account, right?

5:54Combination of segregation of assets as well as just the SIPC protection. And number two is probably Bitcoin, just in the sense that it is yours. Nobody can take it away from you. It is a bearer asset. And I think, you know, it's naive to think that all of a sudden small businesses are going to put all their assets into Bitcoin and start to make payroll that way. That's not going to happen. But small businesses are made up of people. And the individuals who had to go through those three and four harrowing days are starting to think about, you know what, I do want some of my money in Bitcoin. I do want protection from a random bank closure or who knows when a bank will be let to fail without depositors being made whole.

6:33So that re-rating process is real. And the explosion of not only Bitcoin price, but just Bitcoin narrative coming out of that March 10th and subsequent bank failures is real. Yeah, although the issue still remains, it's too volatile to use as money per se. But what it does do very well is protects against the outcomes, which are more central bank printing. It does a very good job with that. It obviously didn't do a very good job with regular kind of supply-demand-led inflation, but it does an extremely good job every time the balance sheet expands. For sure. And I think the right way to think about it from a price standpoint, and, you know, look, there's a lot of digital assets that you can value very easily using traditional methods, right?

7:19A lot of them have revenues. A lot of them have cash flows. You can do a DCF analysis. You can do a comparable comps analysis. You can't do that with Bitcoin. There's no way to value Bitcoin that way. The way to value Bitcoin is probably more using Black Shoals and thinking about Bitcoin as a long-tailed call option. And if you think about the inputs of Black Shoals. Well, one is time. Well, Bitcoin is a perpetual call option. So right there, it has a lot of value. Another one is volatility. Well, obviously, there's high volatility. So that's going to be an input into a higher price. And then, of course, you have interest rates.

7:52And even though interest rates are higher, interest rates historically are still very low. There's a reason that we think about Bitcoin as a long-tailed call option for a one-day situation where maybe you don't feel at all safe with your money or with your banks or with your governments. And of course, here in the US, that's not as big of an issue, even though it's starting to pop up right now. But across the world, that is a huge issue. And when you think about Bitcoin in that framework, about it being a long tail call option on some form of anarchy in the future, it's worth something. And how much that's worth, I don't know if it's 500 billion or a trillion or 5 trillion, but it's definitely worth something.

8:29And I think to your point, it's not money, but it is a protective asset. It is something that you can sit on and know that in a world where I feel unsafe with my other assets, this one is still going to be there, and it's still going to be worth something. Yeah, I've always thought of Bitcoin as a call option on a future financial system. It's like the probability of it being in the money every time you see instance like this goes up, which is exactly to your point. As soon as you see more outcomes that devalues money overall, the more probability that Bitcoin has a much higher value in the future or a much larger role to play.

9:08And we're certainly seeing that. I think another big thing that I think played really into the Bitcoin narrative, which is still probably a bit misunderstood, was shutting Russia out of the SWIFT payment system and saying that all of the treasuries they hold are basically worthless. Yeah. You know, so we've seen record central bank buying of gold. And we know that several central banks have been or central banks or sovereign wealth funds have been acquiring Bitcoin because in this world, they need something like this, a true bearer asset. For sure. And it's not just even the value of money. I would also say it's the value of confidence.

9:45There's two real indications of a lack of bank and government confidence right now. One is clearly what bank stocks are doing. I think there's a lot of hypocritical notions out there saying, you know, digital assets have no intrinsic value. Well, then you think about, well, what exactly is the value of a bank equity? Bank equity is basically the combination of your confidence in the CEO when he or she says that, no, no, no, everything's fine. You know, don't flee. And two is how much profits they can earn on fake money that isn't actually there when they need it. Right. So when you think about what bank equity is, I mean, there's been one hundred and twenty billion dollars of equity wiped out of just the failed institutions alone from Credit Suisse and Silicon Valley.

10:23Bank, not to mention all the losses from the other regional banks that are still, at least right now, a solvent-going concern. But bank equity is kind of a farce, right? It doesn't really, it's not really there because the profits are built up on confidence, and that confidence can go away in 24 hours. So one, you have clearly a loss of confidence in banking alone, as indicated by all the deposits that are fleeing, as well as just the equity. But two is sovereign CDS. You know, I know some of this is aided by, you know, the charade in Washington right now around the debt ceiling. But still, USA CDS has been blowing out all year.

10:59But so has sovereign CDS in most other developed as well as emerging market countries. And when you think again of Bitcoin as some sort of a call option on that future, well, that future includes a loss of confidence in both banks and governments, which we are seeing through the financial markets of sovereign CDS and bank stocks. That inherently makes Bitcoin more valuable. And I think this is truly a pretty efficient and rational market response thus far this year. Hey, everyone. We're going to take a quick pause and hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back.

11:34I also think we've all been monitoring the debt ceiling. And it looks like it's going to come down to something like 2011, where it got to the wire. And a lot of people are suggesting maybe this time is worse. and there is going to be a default, a technical default of sort. Janet Yellen's given us the kind of dead date by about the 1st of June. Others suggest maybe it's July because there's some delayed tax payments to California to come through. But I just can't help but think that is incredibly positive for Bitcoin if you see anything close to a potential default. Because it creates, as you said, a complete lack of trust of the system because you can't price any financial instruments at that point.

12:20Yeah, for sure. And actually, this might be a little bit too bond math nerdy. But for those who understand the credit default swaps market too, don't forget that when you own something like USA CDS, even if there is a technical default, there still has to be the recovery value of the bond. And historically, US Treasury bonds are usually trading near par. But because of the rise in interest rates over the last 18 months, there's plenty of USA bonds, treasury bonds, that are now trading at 75, 80 cents on the dollar because they have low coupons. And that's the price you have to get to get to that 3%, 4%, 5 % yield across the curve, which means that there's a lot of hedge funds now who own USA CDS who are going to try to make noise and push for a technical default because you can actually make money on it given the cheapest to deliver bond in the 70s and 80s.

13:08So not only the political pressure, but also some financial pressure from some of the funds, there is a good chance that you do see, if not an actual technical default, certainly a lot of much more noise around that. And anything, as you said, anything that starts to decrease that confidence is going to be a boon for Bitcoin. So what the hedge funds, what are buying these kind of off the run bonds or whatever it is, and then buying the CDS? Yeah, the lowest dollar price bonds, the cheapest to deliver bonds versus the CDS. And you have so many bonds that are trading in the 70s and 80s because of those half percent, one percent.

13:40That's what's pushing the CDS up. It's specs looking for this particular potential outcome. Especially one year CDS, right? That's why one year CDS is blowing out much more than five year CDS, because we have that trigger here with the debt ceiling and a chance to make a killing if all of a sudden that CDS that's trading at 30 or 40 basis points all of a sudden starts trading at 20 points on the dollar because of those low cheap is to deliver bonds. Well, I hadn't realized that. But I mean, again, this whole shenanigan, regardless of how it goes, just shows the problem of the existing system. There's just, there is no real way out.

14:16You know, the only real way out is run negative real rates or debasement of currency ongoing. Yeah, it's, I mean, you know, something that we've been, you know, obviously yourself as a macro investor, as well as just, you know, anyone who's been spending any time in the debt and equity markets for two decades. I mean, we've been talking about this for a long time, right? There's nothing tremendously new with regard to the long-term thought that there's no way out. But I think we've always sort of given the government and the benefit of the doubt that, yeah, well, they'll just do this forever. They'll print forever.

14:49But now that you have inflation on top of that, it starts to lower that probability of how do you just print your way out of this? And I actually saw a great chart from Deutsche Bank earlier this week that I thought was amazing. They said that so far in 2023, the FDIC has taken over four US banks with combined assets of 560 billion, which is 2 % of GDP. If you go back to the Great Financial Crisis, or even the Savings and Loan Crisis, or even the Depression in the 30s, we're talking about four banks that made up a 2 % GDP. The Great Financial Crisis, there was 500 bank failures that made up about 2 % of GDP.

15:28In the savings and loan crisis in the early 90s, it was over 2 ,000 bank failures that made up 2 % of GDP. And if you go to the Great Depression, it was 10 ,000 bank failures that made up about 6 % of GDP. So I think the takeaway for me there is, shouldn't we be a little scared about what the wider implications mean that four failed banks in 2023 have assets relative to GDP rivaling what hundreds or even thousands of failed banks had in the last three banking failures? That's terrifying, right? And that just shows you just how big the financial system has gotten, plus how big the government has gotten, right?

16:02Because all the great financial crisis was a transfer of private debt to public debt. So you have the biggest governments we ever had, the biggest financial institutions we've ever had. Yeah, that's kind of terrifying and certainly lends itself to why there's a cohort of people and growing every day who are starting to believe in bearer assets like digital assets. Yeah. And the next shoe to drop is a longer term one, which is, yes, right now with the inverted yield curve and everything else, it's a nightmare. And we'll probably see more banks go under. I mean, you know, time of chatting. I mean, yesterday was another ugly day in the banks and doesn't feel like it's going away yet until the Fed cut and steepen the yield curve.

16:41But we've still got this issue of commercial real estate stuck on these banks as well. And that's a long overhang that's not going away. I mean, so few people actually go to the office anymore. I went to a big asset management firm in New York's office last week. It probably seats 400 people. There's probably 20 people in the office. And they're like, oh, yeah, well, people come in two days a week. I'm like, yeah, but you don't need a 400-person office. I mean, go into any WeWork right now. They're empty. And what is WeWork? WeWork is usually small businesses who have only a few employees, or it's the regional employees of a big company.

17:17I mean, they're empty right now. There's nobody who goes to these offices. And you bring up a really interesting point, too, about the commercial real estate, because I think what's really interesting to me about this year, or really the last 18 months, is it's a complete inverse of what we saw in 2008. In 2008, it was large banks failing. Now it's the small regional banks. And it was consumers and regional housing that failed in 2008. Now that's as strong as ever. Everyone has locked in low mortgages and really has no reason to move because they work from home. It's the commercial real estate that's going to get annihilated here because that's a real secular shift.

17:59People don't go to the office anymore. And I think that's a big misnomer. I mean, a lot of people have been talking about, oh, just wait till unemployment, wait till people have to start selling their houses at big losses. Nobody's going to have to sell their house because nobody has to move for a job anymore. You can work from anywhere. So it really is that commercial real estate. And I don't know what the trigger is in terms of when that stuff has to start getting marked to market and when you start to have the defaults there. But that's a huge secular shift that's not going away. Whereas, you know, you look at some of the regional banks, you look at some of the treasuries that banks own that are, you know, marked to market at big losses.

18:34That will reverse, right? Those are par instruments. But, you know, because that's not really a secular shift so much as that's just a financial market shift. But the commercial real estate is a secular change. And I don't know how you combat that. We saw it in Europe, and it ended up on the ECB balance sheet. They basically took any old shit as collateral, old chewing gum wrappers, old cigarette boxes, anything, and they said, we'll lend you against anything. We saw that in Europe, and I think it's just the same outcome. There's no other way around it apart from to shove it on the central bank balance sheet, because if not, the whole banking system is insolvent, and there's no lending left.

19:09Yeah, and especially based on what we just talked about a minute ago with how big the banks and the financial institutions and the government balance sheets already are. I mean, this is, as you said, there's just, there's no way around this. It just keeps making it bigger and bigger and bigger and scarier, in my opinion. I remember that, it's funny you mentioned the Europe, because I remember that, you know, in 2011, 2012, when every hedge fund were sending their best guys to Europe with like a huge fishing net, just waiting to catch all these defaulted loans at 20 cents on the dollar. And none of them came out.

19:38They just said, nope, I know you think it's worth 20 cents on the dollar, but I'm going market at par because the government is basically allowing me to use it as collateral. So I guess that's where we're headed. Exactly right. And I look at liquidity as probably the biggest driver of asset prices because of, I think, this debasement mechanism. And we build a liquidity indicator at Global Macro Investor, and the NASDAQ is 97.5 % correlated since 2010, and Bitcoin is 87.5 % correlated. And it's only lower because Bitcoin has the exponentiality every time you get a bull market. But I mean, that's staggering.

20:18Yeah. And you have more of a frame of reference than I do on that. What were those numbers 20 years ago or 30 years ago? I mean, this is something that we've never seen before? They didn't use the balance sheet. So then you had M2, but M2 is actually the predominant driver of earnings as opposed to price. So the whole world changed in 2008, as everybody reset interest rates at zero, I mean, the entire world did. And so you've got this very cyclical cycle that actually matches the Bitcoin cycle, because Bitcoin was birthed at the same moment. Everything has got an identical cycle, which is basically the global government's debt refi cycle.

20:54And it's between their two-year bonds and their five-year bonds that creates this three-and-a-half-year magical cycle. And so that is what changed everything. And then what we found is every time we get to the lower part of the cycle, the interest payments, and I mathematically worked this out, the interest payments for that period of three and a half years ends up being the amount of QE. It's almost perfect. The only difference is when they have to intervene directly into the banking system because that goes direct onto the bank balance sheet. So they're just monetizing the interest payments of the government, and they're all doing it.

21:32So I backed out all the maths. The Japanese started it first, obviously. I think the whole accord came together in 2012 when Europe went under. But it's Europe, Japan, the US, the UK, Switzerland. It's all the same. They're all doing the same thing. So it's like, oh, wow. So they're just monetizing the interest payments. And that's the entire growth of the balance sheet. Not to mention interest payments are going to be triple what they were three years ago now with the rising rates. I mean, they have to get interest payments out. Part of my core thesis is the tighter you make monetary policy now, the faster you can cut it by end of the year when many of these payments start coming due.

22:15It's madness out there. And this just shows the mess that we're in and the value of why digital assets and why you and I first got into it in the first place is writ large everywhere here. Yeah. And I think that's sitting here in the US, I've spent a lot of my time in New York and in LA specifically. But there's this sense of doom and gloom because of how the regulatory environment is in the US and making it seem as if everything is shut down. But I think, as you and I both know, globally, that's just not the case at all. If you live in the US, you're thinking digital assets, crypto, it's over because all you hear about is these just one after another regulatory actions from the SEC or the CFTC or the White House directly.

23:02But globally, you're seeing still just a tremendous amount of people doing the exact same thing that you and I did seven, eight years ago, which is they're seeing like there is no end in sight here. And I want to get involved either as a developer or as an investor or just as an owner. And what I think is really interesting about 2023 as well is that pretty much all you had to do so far this year as an investor was just fade consensus. The consensus going into the beginning of the year was that digital asset investing is dead amongst FTX and the regulatory crackdown and the string of high-profile bankruptcies.

23:30And, of course, that's been wrong. The consensus view from a macro perspective was higher rates for longer, a drop in stocks and an imminent recession. And obviously, that hasn't happened thus far. The consensus heading into even the banking crisis would be that this would be bearish for all risk assets, including Bitcoin and other digital assets. And that, of course, isn't true. And, you know, equities have actually held up pretty well and certainly had a massive rise in Bitcoin and other crypto assets. And then, you know, consensus view, which I mentioned earlier, was that Bitcoin was largely dead.

23:57And it was, you know, it was uninteresting relative to the other digital assets. And that, of course, has been completely wrong, given Bitcoin's performance. And even Ethereum, right? You go into what everyone expected into the Shanghai Shappella upgrade just last month. You know, the consensus was that Ethereum was going to fall because everyone was going to unstake and sell all their ETH. And of course, the opposite happened, which is, you know, because you are increasing the liquidity of staking, it actually makes people, it makes it more attractive to stake. And you're seeing an increase in new stakers relative to old stakers withdrawing and selling.

24:29So, you know, I think those two things are really interesting. There's that consensus last year was pretty much dead right. Right. Every macro investor had the best year ever last year because it played out perfectly. Whereas this year, consensus has been dead wrong. And on top of it, the digital assets specifically really starting to show up how global this industry really is. Every time there is something in the U.S. that fails or that goes bankrupt or that has regulatory issues, you're just seeing a perfect substitute somewhere else in the world take over that volume or that transactions of those people.

Read the full transcript

25:02Hey, everyone. We're going to take another quick break and hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back to the Real Vision Crypto Daily Briefing.

25:13Yeah, I mean, I looked at this and I went back and I've seen that London is making a lot of noise about what it wants to do here. And I went back and looked at the history of London as a financial center post the rise of the US as the world reserve currency. And after they left the gold standard, the US had currency restrictions. So the UK started the global FX market, because before then there was no FX market, right? because it was all pinned to gold. London already had the gold market. So then they bring the FX market. It becomes the biggest market the world has ever seen. Then the US restricts liquidity to the global system.

25:52The UK develops the euro dollar market. So the euro dollar market grows out the 70s and explodes in the 80s and 90s. And then the next part of the equation was the global derivative market. The US regulated the banking system and didn't give them red cap abilities to use OTC derivatives. So London took it and exploded, which is why most of us worked part of our careers in London. Half the hedge funds in the world were based in London. And so even like Goldman's headquarters was really London. Because, you know, same with Morgan Stanley, same with JP Morgan, everybody was based in London. And I'm just looking at this again, thinking, well, the US is doing exactly the same thing.

26:33Once it feels its monetary system is under threat, it tries to shut down the borders, and everybody just moves over to London. Or whether it's most likely to be London, and then you have the off-centers of Singapore, Hong Kong, other European centers. So as you said, you can't stamp this out. I mean, this is a global phenomenon. It's a cockroach, and you can't kill it. And you're seeing it, right? I mean, obviously, the big headlines were Coinbase and Gemini opening up their non-U.S. derivatives exchanges this week. But even beyond that, I mean, you know, we have a venture fund here at ARCA in additional to our liquid investing funds.

27:09And every single one of our portfolio companies is thinking about how do they get, how do they move out of the U.S. and into Europe or Asia. And pretty much everything from a new standpoint that we're looking at investing in is overseas now as well. I mean, it is just a, you know, if the U.S. government's goal here was to say, hey, can we get on the same list as Iran and Cuba and North Korea and just be on the do not touch list? Like, congratulations, you succeeded, because that's how it's being treated here. You know, nobody wants to touch the U.S. when it comes to crypto and digital assets. And, you know, that may have worked 50, 60 years ago in a sense, but now it's just too easy to move.

27:47It's too easy to cross borders. And to your point, there's precedence of, you know, just moving out of the U.S. into Europe and other areas as the financial hub. So So you're not really shutting anything down. You're just moving it. That's right. And why the UK works, it's so easy for Coinbase to relocate to London because everybody speaks English. It's a rule of law. It's a very understandable culture that everybody's familiar with. It's like it's no great shakes. I mean, if you went to half the staff at Coinbase and said, hey, do you fancy a three-year stint in London? They'll take it. Yeah, for sure.

28:21So it'll be interesting to see how, I mean, obviously you'll have a new administration potentially. So a lot of what's happening right now could get completely reversed. But we're seeing it and feeling it every day. I mean, there is just complete apathy here in the US and it's the exact opposite everywhere else you go. And how difficult are you finding it with banking? It's, I mean, you know, those four or five days in March were certainly difficult just because it came out of left field. And, you know, I think, you know, we're big enough now that we've had redundancies in place here at ARCA. I think a lot of the other bigger companies have had redundancies as well.

28:54But certainly for smaller companies and funds, it was difficult. I would say that, you know, again, there is pretty much perfect substitutes in everything in this industry, right? There's perfect substitutes for stable coins. There's perfect substitutes for exchanges. And there are perfect substitutes for banks. It may take some time to get a new banking relationship up and running. But there are plenty of banks looking to fill the void of Silvergate and Signature Bank here in the US. And certainly abroad, there's no issues. So it's operationally a headache and certainly time consuming, but it is certainly not a death knell.

29:31The other issue the industry, I think, still faces is the concentration risk of the derivative markets of Binance. I mean, it's like 70 % of the entire marketplace. Now, it's good Coinbase is set up now, you know, setting up and there's a few others, but there's a big gaping hole still after FTX. Are you seeing any movement there yet? Well, you know, this is a big reason why we're invested in DYDX and GMX, which are two of the largest decentralized derivatives exchanges. So if you look at, you know, Uniswap now often does as much spot volume as Coinbase, right? I think in the last two months, they've actually done more than Coinbase, making it the number two biggest exchange, and that's a decentralized exchange just for spot, not for derivatives.

30:14So two years ago, the total decentralized spot volumes was about 1 % of total volumes. Today, it's closer to 15%. Decentralized derivatives is right about 1 % right now in terms of the total amount of derivatives on decentralized exchanges versus Binance and other centralized exchanges. So I think you're going to see the same trajectory, right? In the last two years, spot volumes went from 1 % to 15 % on decentralized exchanges. And I think you're going to see the same thing in derivatives. It's going to start to move towards decentralized exchanges. And DYDX has about 65 % market share. I think GMX has another 15 % or 20%.

30:48So those are the two big horses, in our opinion. So I think there's no question that too much concentration, too much of a monopoly is not a great thing.

31:02that market share up for grabs is going to be there for someone. It's not going to stay at Binance forever. Binance may continue to grow, but its market share overall should go down as other competitors, whether decentralized or centralized, come after that piece of the pie. Yeah, it just makes it an opportunity for everybody. If you're backing the right horse, there's a lot of money to be made because there's a huge imbalance of market share that needs to be addressed. Absolutely. And I think, too, this is sort of a little bit off topic, but I don't know if you saw, it was just yesterday or the day before, there was a huge WIC high.

31:33On Bitfinex, I think Bitcoin traded at$56 ,000. Obviously, that's not representative of the price. But I think that's really interesting as well, that because this is such a global industry with such low barriers to entry, is that you will always see, again, in some of the developed nations, it's much harder to get a license. It's much harder to get up and running. But elsewhere in the world, it's pretty easy, right? It's low barriers to entry, a few lines of code, and all of a sudden you can be up and running. This is always going to be a very fragmented industry. You know, even if you have the Binances or the Coinbases or the Uniswaps or the DYDX is having a majority of the market share, the lower, you know, the other side of it is that you're going to have 50, 60, 100 competitors taking the, you know, bottom five or 10 % market share.

32:13And it really resembles the corporate bond market a lot. You know, if you think about how corporate bonds trade or even, you know, emerging markets, even to some extent treasuries, but really more corporates, or you can put munis in there as well. You have 50, 60, 70 broker dealers all quoting a price. And then all of a sudden, one small bucket shop or third tier bank, all of a sudden, a broker has a different market, right? So maybe there's 50 guys making an 80 bid, 82 offer on a bond. And all of a sudden, one guy has 90 bid, 92 offer. And you're like, wait a minute, is that manipulation or is that price discovery?

32:44And it's the same thing, right? That's what somebody did at Bitfinex the other day. They said, okay, liquidity is really low right now. I'm going to run this up at Bitfinex at$56 ,000, see if I can get some of the ARBs and bots offside and see if I can make other exchanges and other market makers start to raise their prices higher and reset price. And I think most of the people who trade digital assets come from an FX background or come from a commodities background. But realistically, it trades more like the corporate bond market, which is incredibly fragmented liquidity, lots of weird price discrepancies happening in different jurisdictions and different currencies.

33:18And I think that is actually a really good thing. It sort of shows that you're never going to have just a real monopoly because there's just always going to be this fat tail of smaller. And there's also simply not enough hedge fund or primary capital in the space compared to the traditional markets at three trillion. There's just not enough participants to really make the markets efficient yet, which is another huge opportunity. You and I have talked about this. It's another huge opportunity because it's inefficient all over the place. And that void will be filled too. I mean, a lot of the bigger players in the space who were doing a lot of that ARB and a lot of that, quote unquote, fast money type trading to close some of those inefficiencies, a lot of them are the ones that went under, right?

34:05From your Alamedas and there's already big funds across the globe that are starting to fill that void and get into that space. So you'll always see attempts to bring that market efficiency in, but you'll also always see these anomalies and one-offs because of the fragmented global nature of this industry. Moving on, we'll come back to Bitcoin in a bit, but how are you thinking now about the ETH staking yield? I think you and I have talked about this in the past. I think now we've got liquid staking. We've got a liquid money market curve out to a year. I think people don't understand how big a deal this probably is.

34:44I think it's huge. I think it really is a big deal. And it also comes down to understanding kind of investor behavior and workflows, which is why we're so bullish on ETH. Because if you think about it, there's four reasons to hold ETH, right? One is you're holding it on an exchange as collateral for trading futures or options, right? If you're doing that, you're probably, the staking rate isn't going to affect you all that much because you're using that ETH as a productive asset and you need to continue to use it. Number two is you're utilizing it in DeFi applications, again, as collateral. So that's not going to affect too much.

35:15Three is you're keeping it in a wallet just to be used for gas. That's not going to change, right? So the first three usages of ETH are not going to change at all because of staking. But the fourth one does change. And that's anybody who holds it passively as an investment. And that includes funds, that includes individuals. Historically, you've earned zero on that ETH. And now you can earn somewhere between four and 7%, depending on the participation of stakers and how that fluctuates. That basically means that you know the rule of thumb as an asset manager. It's never earn nothing when you can earn something, right?

35:48Not withstanding the risks of who you're staking through and any of the operational risks. But if you can earn something versus earn nothing, you generally try to earn something, right? That's half the entire financial industry is just built on that float concept right there, which is if I can delay payment for even 12 hours, I can earn some yield on that 12 hours. So the right thing to do is not compare ETH staking rates to treasuries because that's not relevant, right? It's not like people are going to take their money out of treasuries to own a volatile asset like ETH just to earn the yield.

36:15But you need to compare it to the passive yield of earning nothing versus earning something. And that basically means that if you look at other proof-of-stake networks, most of them are 50 % to 70 % staked right now, whereas ETH is about 15%. I think that rises to 50%, 60 % over the course of the next couple of years. And when you couple that with what you're saying about the curve and having an actual, whether it's through structured products or just through duration mismatches, this is going to basically be the risk-free rate in crypto. That's how people are going to think about it. Yeah. And I think everything can be benchmarked against it, which helps everybody tremendously because everyone before with Celsius and everything else, they didn't understand the difference in yields.

36:57So this can be, it can be ETH plus as how we price yields, which I think gets really interesting. Yeah, and 100%. And even though the lending market is a shell of what it was, post the events of last year from Celsius to BlockFi to FTX and Genesis, centralized lending is largely dead right now. But decentralized lending on Compound and Aave and Maker is still flourishing. And when you bring to it now this component of a yield curve where it's like, well, what is the difference in a rate between borrowing for three months versus nine months versus 18 months? And is there going to be a curve built in there?

37:33And can you do a little, you know, quasi net interest margin banking with duration mismatches? It's going to get really interesting. And there's a lot of companies and projects out there that are trying to take advantage of it. And, you know, again, you look back two, three years ago at, you know, DeFi was barely off the ground. Stablecoins were barely off the ground. NFTs were barely off the ground. And now those are a staple of what we think about in terms of, you know, the growing industries within digital assets, structured products and rate arbitrage and curves might be where we are two, three years from now.

38:02I mean, this might be a full-fledged financial market in two or three years. Well, you know, having been, you know, I grew up in the derivative market and I look at this and you see an asset that people want to own and you see it has a yield and the volatility is pretty much at its low. So you get the ability to take the yield and buy options. And so you can create guaranteed products or defined risk products or enhanced return products, which was the explosion in the European derivative markets and the Asian derivative markets in the 90s onwards. And I kind of rode part of that wave. And I look at it now and I'm like, in three years time or two years time or one year's time, we'll see a ton of these things.

38:41You know, 80 % guaranteed funds, 90 % guaranteed funds or accelerator funds, all of that stuff. Yeah, I mean, I was one of the earlier traders of credit default swaps back in, you know, 05, 06, 07, 08. And it was the same thing. It was like people didn't really understand them at first. It was a very kind of niche one-off thing. And then, you know, by 08, 09, it was like, you know, everybody was trading them. And everyone understood how to price the curve and, you know, how to think about, you know, the different derivative instruments. So it's the same thing. Like, you know, again, I don't know if it's six months away or six years away.

39:12But there's no question that there's real time money and investor interest in coming up with these different structured products and derivatives around ETH interest rates. Yeah, I mean, I've had lots of people write to me saying, you know, ex-head of all trading at Goldman writes to me and is like, oh, we've setting up a shop. We're going to do some of this stuff. You know, there's a lot of activity of people who are seeing it because they've seen it before. And they're like, oh, yeah, I can make some real margins and real stuff. So it's fascinating. To go on back to Bitcoin, there's another change that's happened, which is ordinals.

39:46How are you thinking through that? I mean, the Bitcoin community was completely split by what? You're using it not for ultrasound money where, you know, it's the hallowed ground. And now people are trading JPEGs on it. Yeah, I mean, so we have a full team here, dedicated entities. And these guys are incredibly smart. And even they don't fully understand and grasp everything that's going on with Bitcoin ordinals yet, just because it's so new. But from my standpoint, more at a higher level, just thinking about markets, thinking about finance, one, it's just amazing. Here's this asset that's been around for 11 years.

40:19It's basically been defined by the fact that there's literally nothing to do. It's just a pet rock. It's just this asset that is a bearer asset that is potential protection against sovereign and banking craziness one day. And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, here come these NFTs and inscriptions. And I was like, that's amazing that an asset that's 11 years old, that basically did nothing new or innovative for the entire time is all of a sudden, this just happens and it becomes a real market. So from that standpoint, it just, to me, it just opens up the creativity again of just how many times this industry has just evolved.

40:54If even Bitcoin can still evolve, It's fascinating. Now, I don't know. I certainly don't have a, I have no issues with Bitcoin having other use cases. I know some of the people in the Bitcoin community are up in arms saying this is not what Bitcoin was meant for. For me, I'm just looking at purely from a creative standpoint. I'm thinking this is awesome. Anytime you can introduce a new variable to something, it increases the value and increases the use cases. So I personally have not, you know, I was certainly understood and was involved personally as well as through our ARCA funds in Ethereum NFTs and through Solana NFTs.

41:30I have not touched the Bitcoin NFTs yet because it's a little too complex for me and I don't quite understand it yet. But I'm fascinated by it. I'm too much of a boomer to try and navigate that. Everyone says it's quite difficult. I'm like, I'll leave it to somebody else. Let it get easier and a little more straightforward before I use it. But I think it's incredible. And I'm excited to see. And also just, you know, little things can snowball, too, right? Just the amount of Bitcoin transactions that are happening as a result of this, even though it's a little bit of a flash in the pan when you see it, it does increase interest in Bitcoin.

42:04It increases developing power in Bitcoin. And so it's like, you know, you see how a little thing like this can then snowball into something much bigger as well, which is also why we're all here, right? We want to see the creativity and the masterminds of developers and how they think about how to use these technologies. So what other layer ones are you interested in? Solana's been a great story from it's completely dead to, you know, one of the best performing assets this year. But what's on your radar screen? What are you looking at that's interesting? For sure. Before I say that, I want to go one back.

42:36One more thing popped in my head in the Bitcoin ordinals is what I'm really interested in is, you know, take a dollar bill, for instance. Dollar bills have serial numbers on them, but you never think about that. Right. You're never like, oh, that one with the five zeros on it is more valuable than the one with the three sixes. You just assume that a dollar is worth a dollar. I do. I am fascinated with what happens with Bitcoin ordinals in the sense that, you know, if some of the lowest the lowest denomination of a Bitcoin is a Satoshi. If some Satoshis have basically an NFT on them through the ordinals and others don't, are you going to start to get to a point where it's like, I'm going to trade you one Bitcoin for one Bitcoin, but I actually think that Bitcoin is more valuable than this one because of what's on there?

43:19Almost like an old Spanish coin that you find in a treasure chest. I'm not sure where that heads, but I think that's fascinating as well. And I think from that standpoint, I do understand why there are some in the Bitcoin community who don't like this. Because if you want to think of Bitcoin as this truly fungible asset, and now all of a sudden maybe there's that hint of something being more valuable than others, it could get really, really, really interesting. Fascinating. I hadn't even thought through that. Yeah, so let's talk about other Layer 1s, Layer 2s. What are you looking at that's interesting to you?

43:49Yeah, so the way that it was described to me by a shout out to Nick Holtz, who's one of our great research analysts here at ARCA. But he always thought about if you think about what a layer one blockchain is, it is in the business of selling block space. That's what it does. So in 2021, when you had the real rise of all these alternative layer ones, it was because there was more activity going on because of DeFi and NFTs than the Ethereum blockchain could handle. Basically, there was more demand for block space than there was supply. And as a result, you need to increase the supply of block space.

44:24And where did that come from? It came from Solana. It came from Avalanche. It came from Phantom, even Terra Luna, you know, prior to exploding. And then you go into 2022 and the opposite happened, which is all of a sudden activity ground to a halt, right? NFTs became less interesting. DeFi rates were no longer as interesting because of the collapse of all the lenders. And all of a sudden there was a dearth, you know, there was a lack of demand for block space and a ton of supply. And that's why basically Ethereum came back to the limelight and the other layer ones kind of fell off. And instead, it gave the Ethereum layer two blockchains a chance to really grow and improve so that the next time we get this big demand for block space, you may not need these alternative layer ones because you have all the capacity you need and all the throughput on Ethereum itself.

45:13So from that standpoint, that's really what we've been looking at is, is there a layer one blockchain out there that doesn't compete with Ethereum, but rather finds a new niche, right? Can Flow become the sports blockchain? Can Chili's become the sports blockchain now that it's converting? Can something like Solana become the NFT blockchain? You look at all these different ones and you think about maybe business development is more important than technology. That's my view as well. It's all about understanding a clear narrative. Exactly. And if ETH is everything, then you need to stand for something to compete.

45:53Right. And we could get to a point where Ethereum just becomes the security layer for everything. But you have these little niche blockchains, especially with things like Cosmos and IBC, when effectively there's no barriers to becoming your own layer one. DYDX, I mentioned earlier, as one of the decentralized derivatives exchanges, they're becoming their own blockchain. They're going to be building on the Cosmos ecosystem and become their own chain. I think eventually that's probably where like a Uniswap heads as they become their own chain. You need to create a value for these tokens. And the way to create value for these tokens is for them to become the gas token and the security token for the network.

46:27So I think because it's so easy to become your own layer one, you're going to see hundreds, if not thousands, of these competitive layer ones. And each of them is going to have to have their own actual niche. Whereas Ethereum is sort of, like you said, has become sort of everything. You know, I tell investors that they're like, you know, five years ago, if you wanted to invest in just blockchain, it was kind of hard to figure out what to do. Should I be invested in Bitcoin or what's this Ripple or Stellar and all these other things? Now it's pretty clear that if you just want to be like a generic, if you want to generically tell someone I'm invested in blockchain, Ethereum is the way to do that.

46:58Yeah, and you get a yield. And you get a yield, right? Ethereum touches NFTs. It touches DeFi. It touches stable coins. It touches pretty much everything, right? If you want to generically have exposure to blockchain, it's not Bitcoin, it's Ethereum. These other layer ones are not going to compete with that. They have to find a niche. It has to be sports or gaming or, you know, Avalanche is trying to corner the gaming market, right? So I think, you know, that's going to be a big thing is which one of these guys wins the business development race to partner with enough developers and studios and whoever who are going to build a specific type of project on their blockchain.

47:30That's why Chili's, you know, I mentioned Chili's to you a couple of years ago. I remember on one of our talks back when it was trading. Yeah, I spoke to Alex Dreyfus quite a lot. You know, I follow that. I mean, that's what's so interesting to me is like you look at all the competition in digital assets. That's the one token and project that has no competition. They just own that space. They own the sports landscape. And now that they're building their own chain, I think it goes live next week with their own Chili's 2.0 chain. Like that could become the layer one blockchain that anybody in sports and entertainment uses.

47:58So we'll see how it all plays out. But that's what I'm looking for. We're looking for the ones that can actually carve out a niche and have some sort of marketing presence more so than a technological presence. Yeah, I think that's right. Because in the end, it's about network adoption. The technology, there's some limits to what we actually need. There'll be some that will have a technological breakthrough and it becomes easier to, let's say, put video files on chain or whatever. OK, fine. There'll be a niche for that. But I think you're right. Right. Looking, you know, I personally think that we're in crypto spring right now and, you know, we can just continue.

48:34It usually is a bit choppy first and then it gets very interesting next year. When you're looking forward, what are the kinds of areas of activity do you think we're going to see a resurgence of? Obviously, we've talked about DeFi and you think there's opportunities there. And actually, the collapse from last summer will have caused more money to be invested into DeFi and solving some of these problems. What else? NFTs feels like it needs a new change of narrative. Yeah, I think NFTs is real, though, but not necessarily in terms of JPEGs and monkey pictures and things like that. I think you're going to start to see the decentralized identities become a big deal.

49:13By the way, when you talk about JPEGs and monkey pictures, that was my bored ape in the background, exactly at the right time. I love it. I love it. I think that's where NFTs really get interesting is, you know, think about gaming, for example. Gaming is obviously trillions of dollars in the Web 2 world. And you have a ton of studios starting to think about a Web 3 component to that. And that all is going to include NFTs, right? The idea of instead of skins on Fortnite actually becoming your own ownable asset that's a tradable asset, that's a huge, huge evolution of where NFTs are going to be headed, right?

49:46I mean, you know, you look at something like Madden, right? that there's a new season of NFL Madden every year. And no matter how much sweat equity you poured into the old season, nothing ports over to the new season. You have to start over. What if you can start porting over some of the teams that you built or some of the players? Or what if I want to put LeBron James in an NFL game? Maybe I build up my NBA 2K and I want to take that asset over to another game. I think there's things like that that are really going to be the next real evolution of NFTs. And on top of that, I think kind of real world NFTs as well, meaning like this is something that I've always thought about is, let's say I go to a doctor for a regular just checkup, right?

50:31And then three weeks later, I get hit by a car and I go to an ER that's a totally different network. They have a totally different idea of who Jeff Dorman is, right? One sees the healthy profile of Jeff Dorman and that, and the other one sees this emergency. What if you could have your health records as an NFT and you can just very easily update them yourselves and you own them and you can give them out as you need? Or what if your on-chain activity becomes your decentralized identification? Instead of walking into a bank to get a loan where immediately they're judging you whether they think they are or not, they're looking at your skin color, they're looking at your ethnicity, they're looking at whether you're male or female, They're looking at whether you're big or small.

51:12I mean, they're looking at everything and making an opinion, whether subconsciously or not, and whether or not to approve a loan. Whereas what if just your activity on chain becomes your identity? And it doesn't matter who you are or where you come from. It's just you have this proof of who you are that just stays with you forever. So I think those kind of NFTs is probably the next wave. Less sexy and less price appreciative, as we've seen in the initial form of NFTs. but certainly much more practical and much more long lasting. Yeah, ticketing is the other big one for me. Yeah, ticketing and coupons too.

51:46I mean, what about your Bed Bath & Beyond 20 % off coupon that you get every week in the mail? I mean, that becomes an NFT. You spend it and you use it and you move on. Yeah, I mean, that whole rise of Web3 loyalty programs using NFTs as a structure, an architecture to do that, I think is, I still speak to a lot of big brands and they're not phased by anything that's happened. all they're seeing is I can get closer to my customer, I can cut out middlemen, and I can create loyalty. Yeah, 100%. And I think it goes beyond corporate brands. I mean, there's been a lot of success stories there, right, from Nike to, you know, Reddit and Starbucks who are doing it.

52:23But I think it even goes beyond corporates. I think the next wave is, and there's a lot more to do in corporates for sure. I mean, you know, everything with airline miles and, you know, anything with subscriptions, things like Netflix, Disney, all that stuff. But I also think you'd probably go beyond that. It's probably universities and municipalities as well. I mean, think about if New York City had a real token where anytime there was a surplus in the New York budget, it could be divinated out to token holders. Anytime you needed a new park or project, you could, you know, instead of doing a general obligation bond or, you know, some other form of fundraising, you could just issue a token to fund a project.

53:00And maybe if you're a token holder, you get better access to the parks or a cheaper fare on the subway or maybe a fast pass at LaGuardia or JFK. There's all kinds of things you can do with that. Universities, too. Think about just the way donors and boosters work at universities. What if I have – my son is 10, my daughter is 6. What if when they were born I could have bought Harvard coin? And if they go to Harvard 18 years later, I could redeem that for tuition. And if they don't, maybe I can trade it for Yale token or Stanford token. I think there's so many things like that that haven't even been thought about yet.

53:37Even your degrees. Yeah. They should be NFTs, right? For sure. Yeah, 100%. And these can be soulbound. Exactly. Yeah. I mean, there's just so many different things that we haven't even scratched the surface on. I think partially just because the regulatory environment has certainly stifled some of the innovation. But also, as you know, there's just not really any investment bankers yet in this space that have found a way to be paid for consulting and coming up with these ideas. I started my career in 2000 on Wall Street, and I sat next to some of the most innovative product designers and creators ever that were all kind of coming up with new ways, just like you talked about the derivatives boom.

54:15There's always people trying to financialize things and think of new ways to do it. But you haven't seen a lot of that yet in kind of corporate and municipalities and universities just because there's nobody who's figured out a way to get paid from that. But eventually they will. You'll find a way and it'll just be an explosion of use cases of NFTs as well as other fungible tokens. So final question for you. I mean, we're both bullish of this space by nature, so that's not helping anybody really. Anything you see on the radar screen that is an underpriced risk? I mean, there's a lot of risk we all know about.

54:49But is there anything you think, you know, people should just pay a little more attention to that? Purely in terms of downside risk or upside risk as well? Both. My upside risk is ETH staking plus burning means that in a bull market, you might end up with no supply, which I think could be a real problem. And I think options, way out of the money options next year, probably wildly mispriced. And the other risk to me is the big Binance option, because the derivative market, if that goes, it takes a while before hedge funds and other participants can spin up new counterparts to absorb it. I think in terms of underpriced upside risk, it's probably the court cases, right?

55:31You have Ripple versus the SEC, you have Grayscale versus the SEC, and you have Coinbase versus the SEC. And I don't think you're going to get summary judgment. I don't think you're going to get settlements in any of these, which means you're going to court at some point. It might be 18 to 24 months away, but you are going to go to court with all these cases. And once it gets into the hands of a court, anything can happen, right? First of all, we don't know if it's going to be a jury trial or if it's going to be a bench. So anything can happen. And I think you could see, I think especially here in the U.S., everything regulatory and legal is just being viewed as worst case scenario.

56:06If you get any sort of a positive upside surprise out of any of these court rulings, I think you could just see an explosion higher. Ripple could be soon, right? I think it looks like the judge is not going to pass summary judgment and therefore it is going to go to a trial. That's our understanding. So I don't think it'll be that soon, but that should be the sooner of all of those three. So I think that's a real upside risk. In terms of downside risk, my biggest one is simply that we're just wrong on the impact of this technology. you know yeah that would be bad that's that's the biggest one to me is that you know it's like I you know I just got back from Italy I was there on on vacation for a week and you know I had a USDC wallet ready to go looking for all these different where places where I would use it and I was like there's just nowhere to use it like people aren't really interested in transacting on a daily basis with something like USDC you know I think we all think eventually T plus one T plus two, T plus three settlement is crazy.

57:04And eventually everything should be T plus zero, which would be a blockchain. But maybe we're wrong. Maybe there's reasons for T plus one, T plus two that these financial institutions just are never going to get to real instantaneous settlement. So I think that's the biggest downside risk is just that this isn't as impactful as we think it is. That would be a multi-trillion dollar error of human judgment. It would be quite weird, But these things, well, I think that will be the largest industry ever to have failed. Yeah, I think so. I mean, again, we're talking about what is, you said what's underpriced.

57:38To me, that would be underpriced. And I guess we would see that by a lack of growth of the ecosystem in this next cycle, let's call it that. So if we're not seeing adoption grow at the rates that we, doesn't have to be past cycles, But if it's disappointing in its growth, then we've got questions to ask. Yeah, exactly. And I think that's, you know, to your point, to your question of what is the risk that isn't priced in. Like, to me, that's just the one that's not priced in. That's what I spend a lot of time thinking about. Like, I'm constantly, I'm just making sure, even if it's just incremental.

58:10I think in 2020, 2021, it was very steep in terms of the adoption, the growth. It's still gradual. It's still happening. I'm looking for anything that makes it look like it's just not happening. I haven't seen it. But to me, that would be the risk that scares me the most. because I don't care if this takes two years or 20 years or 200 years. To me right now, it seems obvious that this is the future, and I don't care about whether or not I was right on the timing necessarily. But if I'm just wrong completely on the thesis, that's something that is a different story. That would be embarrassing. Jeff, fabulous conversation as ever.

58:45Great to see you, and let's see how this next year plays out. It should be an interesting one, I think. Likewise. I always enjoy talking to you. Thanks for having me. Yeah, fabulous. Now, as ever, fabulous conversation with Jeff. So much to catch up on. He's always got great perspectives and how to see the world. I did like his answer to, well, what's the biggest risk is like, well, we're all wrong. And the whole space is not that valuable. I think that's a very honest approach to take. But it was just very interesting to hear Jeff, who's been deep down the rabbit hole of so many other projects, is focusing on Bitcoin, saying, hey, listen, the use case has not gone away and it's proving itself.

59:24I thought it was very interesting. And as ever, Jeff's thoughts about the evolution, how the DeFi markets and new decentralized exchanges are growing, I think that's very interesting. I think there's, as ever, a lot going on in the space. and I think it's going to look vastly different in two years time than it does today. Let's just hope the adoption keeps going up because if not, we've all got it wrong. What's up, revolutionaries? Thanks for tuning in. For more content like this, head over to realvision.com and get unfiltered access to the very best, brightest, and biggest names in finance.

From the publisher

In this long over-due catch-up, Jeff Dorman, CIO of Arca, joins Raoul to examine the fallout from the ongoing banking crisis and share why he's bullish on Bitcoin. Jeff and Raoul also cover ETH staking, regulation, and just what might be the biggest issue for the industry going forward. Recorded on May 3, 2023.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Raoul Pal: The Journey Man

All 379 episodes
Bitcoin and the Banking Crisis w/ Jeff DormanRaoul Pal: The Journey Man · 1 h 3 min
Listen in VO