1. Podcasts
  2. Science Weekly
  3. Is your boss watching you? The rise of AI surveillance at work
Science Weekly

15 Oct 2026 · 18m · 9 chapters

Episode artwork

Is your boss watching you? The rise of AI surveillance at work

In short

The episode discusses the rise of “bossware” and AI-assisted employee monitoring in the UK and beyond, arguing it enables constant surveillance by recording work activity and using AI to analyze performance. It cites that as of 2025, about a third of UK companies use bossware.

Guests

Robert Booth, The Guardian’s UK technology editor and reporter. Key examples include Multiverse, an AI/digital skills training company founded by Ewan Blair (Tony Blair’s eldest son), which uses AI to monitor online teacher/coaching sessions by analyzing call glitches, dropped calls, filler phrases, student silence/single-word replies, and time spent in one-on-one exchanges; it outputs confidence scores and “risk status” for managers, who still write reviews. The episode also references Meta’s controversial keyboard monitoring (paused after pushback) and notes monitoring in call centers, finance, and tech.

Key claims

AI’s speed and data appetite shift monitoring from occasional checks to continuous scoring; UK/EU rules require transparency and restrict emotion/social scoring; workers report stress, insomnia, and “signals” language from AI; surveillance may increase deviance by reducing autonomy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes.

Chapters

0:46

The Rise of AI Surveillance

Discussion on the increase of AI surveillance in the workplace.

“And to be fair, that was probably an underestimation.”
1:17

Understanding AI Monitoring Tools

Exploration of the various AI tools used for monitoring employee activities.

“From The Guardian, I'm Ian Sample, and this is Science Weekly.”
2:15

Case Study: Multiverse

An overview of Multiverse's approach to AI monitoring in their training programs.

“You first reported on this last month in relation to a company called Multiverse.”
3:40

Whistleblowers and AI Impact

Insights from employees on how AI monitoring affects their work experience.

“And so what have the whistleblowers there been saying about what's been going on?”
5:44

Sector Adoption of AI Monitoring

Examination of which sectors are integrating AI monitoring and why.

“Rather, it kind of directs the manager to what is the area that we should be focusing on with this teacher, you know, by highlighting the problems quickly.”
7:50

Legal Framework of Monitoring

Discussion on the legal requirements surrounding employee monitoring in the UK and EU.

“And then they said the most consequential performance management action it can take is to recommend that a human personally reviews the session.”
10:12

Psychological Effects of Surveillance

Exploration of the psychological impact of continuous workplace surveillance on employees.

“But things they can't do under the EU AI Act, they're not allowed to use the AI monitoring to recognize your emotions and your emotional state and to kind of try and detect demeanor.”
14:00

Impact of Monitoring on Worker Behavior

Exploration of how surveillance affects employee autonomy and behavior.

“And that creates a kind of more rebellious worker.”
16:01

Future of AI in Workplace Surveillance

Discussion on the potential evolution and implications of AI surveillance in the workplace.

“Well, I think we're already starting to see it become an issue for trade unions.”
A man walking through an airport, asking his phone a question

Ask about this episode

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.

Claude

On Science Weekly, what are the key points of this episode?

Searching your listening

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is The Guardian.

0:30used Thumbtack. I can hire a top-rated pro that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices, and read reviews. Thumbtack knows homes. Download the app today.

0:45As of 2025, a third of UK companies were using so-called bossware to track workers' activity. And to be fair, that was probably an underestimation. AI is only making this kind of surveillance more sophisticated, and it could be coming to your workplace.

1:09So today, the rise of AI employee monitoring and what it does to those being watched. From The Guardian, I'm Ian Sample, and this is Science Weekly.

1:25Robert Booth, you're the Guardian's UK technology editor, and you've been reporting on the increase in AI-assisted monitoring at work. Give me a sense of the kinds of things this could be. So this is recording calls, looking at email transcripts, checking your mouse movements, sometimes checking your keystrokes, seeing what kind of files you've opened, what you might have done with them it can go as far in some cases as even using kind of cameras to see how people are moving around the offices but you know lots of the time it's kind of recording of phone calls or recording of kind of interactions and then using the ai to produce instant transcripts and then analyzing those transcripts to work out kind of what's going right what's going wrong and monitoring performance it isn't anything new or necessarily bad i mean people might be used to hearing that a call with a customer services agent is being monitored for training or quality purposes so where does ai come in how does that step things up a gear yeah well i think it's the you know it's the sheer capability of the technology at crunching through huge amounts of data incredibly quickly and its appetite is it can never be sated can it with ai the more data you give it the happier it seems to be so what you have is a difference between kind of the occasional check, which is kind of all that a manager could previously do, to having constant monitoring.

2:53You first reported on this last month in relation to a company called Multiverse. They supply AI and digital skills training to workers in the NHS, local councils, universities, the private sector, including here at The Guardian, I should say. Tell me a bit more about Multiverse. Tell me about them. What do they do? This is a company set up by Ewan Blair, the eldest son of the former british prime minister tony blair he's kind of envisaged it as a kind of fast-growing tech company essentially it's training workers and apprentices in how to use technology he's really got switched on to ai he talks about kind of employers wanting to be he says as ai pilled as possible so he's a real kind of advocate for ai um ai pilled ai pilled yeah well i think i think that essentially means is you're a believer right that you're high on ai you've well not about high but uh but definitely a believer um uh possibly high he calls it an upskilling platform for ai so that the companies and you know as you say the public sector the employees are starting to use ai better but he's also using ai to monitor the teachers that he has they do online classroom sessions and they've started last month to use an ai system to monitor every aspect of those interactions that their kind of teachers and coaches are doing.

4:15And so what have the whistleblowers there been saying about what's been going on? Well, like I say, this started last month. So it's felt kind of very new to them. It's a real change in their kind of working circumstances. So for example, they were saying that, you know, the AI will pick up on how long it takes them to fix glitches with the IT. If the kind of call drops out if they haven't got it clicked on again within a minute or so then it'll kind of flag that or if they're using too many filler phrases like sort of and kind of things that i've got to watch out for as we do this um then they get flagged for that as well and then the other thing which which i think is kind of really really kind of um uh he says as he fills some filler phrases the is that when the when the students go quiet or they only respond with kind of single word answers that's also seen as a kind of um a bad sign and equally if the if a teacher gets pulled into a one-on-one exchange with one student for too long that can be seen as a sign that the rest of the group is being sidelined it is going into really fine detail and it's the ai that's kind of analyzing all of these things you can see how it could do that in a way that a human couldn't at scale and then it provides a kind of percentage score a percentage confidence score about how they're doing in these different areas and a kind of risk status so that the senior people at multiverse can kind of look at the teacher's work and give them feedback and and the managers can then talk to them about what they want to do differently and importantly i think i mean what multiverse makes clear is that the ai isn't replacing the human judgment in terms of of how the teacher is performing.

6:04Rather, it kind of directs the manager to what is the area that we should be focusing on with this teacher, you know, by highlighting the problems quickly. And that's essentially using the AI, and I'm quoting here the spokesperson, using an AI to improve the experience of learners and customers. And in the end, only human managers will be the ones that write the performance reviews of the teachers.

6:34Rob, do we know if some sectors are doing this more than others? Are some embracing it? Yeah, well, I think one of the quite interesting things in looking at this is realizing that this kind of monitoring has been going on for hundreds of years in industry and in factories, where the outputs are a bit more binary, aren't they? They're a bit more obvious. You can see how many widgets are coming out of the machine at the end of the day, how many man hours have clocked in and out but this is allowing it the same sort of surveillance if you like to move into the more amorphous world of white collar work and so you're seeing a lot in kind of call center operations we're seeing in finance in banks for example training companies like multiverse and and also kind of ai companies themselves like tech companies who are obviously kind of more switched on to it.

7:24There was the case of Meta were using key stroke monitoring of their workers. And it was very controversial and there was pushback and I think they paused it. But that was because they wanted to monitor what their workers were doing in order that they could use that information to train AIs in order to do those kind of jobs. So there's different reasons for doing it. Sometimes it's quality control, but sometimes it's also training AIs to replace these people. monitoring them to replace them i was going to ask you about that is is what are the companies saying are their reasons for doing this i think one of the things to bear in mind about uh this phenomenon is that it kind of coincides with the pandemic and the rise in working from home so there was a kind of obvious incentive there for people and a need for people to be more connected and so monitoring starts to come in more easily at that level so one of the things they say is this is enabling people to work more remotely because we can keep an eye on you more remotely by using ai you don't have to be in the office all of the time i think also there's just a straightforward answer which is that it's obviously going to be more efficient to use an ai if it's effective that is than human monitoring managers don't really want to be spending their time doing the monitoring they want to be spending their time kind of solving the problems that the monitoring throws up so you know that's obviously a good thing for them and they're also saying that it kind of promotes the development of the worker because if they are taking the feedback and they're getting better at their job and some and some workers do talk about this themselves as well which is actually oh my god i didn't realize i was doing that the other thing multiverse said was that the agent the ai agent provides instructors with improved advice on development and feedback and they said that that's exactly how any learning organization should actually be deploying AI.

9:14And then they said the most consequential performance management action it can take is to recommend that a human personally reviews the session. It's a really interesting question about sort of transparency that comes into all of this. And are companies who do this, are they obliged to tell their workers that they're doing it, when they're doing it, what they're doing exactly? And if not, how are workers finding out? Well, yes. I mean, in the UK, they have to, employers must explain the amount of monitoring they're doing quite clearly. They're supposed to do it either like in your contract or in the staff handbook.

9:48So it's known about. And I mean, in the cases that I've been writing about the last few weeks, you know, the employees have been told that this is what's happening. Their issue is how it actually affects them. And there are kind of rules around it. It's got to be necessary. It's, you know, it's got to be proportionate. You can't just egregiously do it. There has to be a purpose behind it, a legitimate purpose behind it. In the EU, the rules are a little tougher. They're allowed to do productivity scoring with this kind of surveillance. But things they can't do under the EU AI Act, they're not allowed to use the AI monitoring to recognize your emotions and your emotional state and to kind of try and detect demeanor.

10:28And also, they're not allowed to kind of socially score you. So they're not allowed to kind of rate the nature of your interactions, how often you might be taking breaks, things that aren't necessarily like core related to your job performance. Those things are prohibited.

10:47Coming up, the psychological impact of workplace surveillance.

11:00You said Brexit will be a galvanising, liberating, empowering moment of patriotic renewal. Yes. So are you feeling galvanised, liberated, empowered? Yes. All of them? Yes. All at the same time? Lucky, lucky man. For almost four decades, Michael Gove has been one of the biggest brains in conservative politics, among the right's leading thinkers. Confidence in a shared British identity has taken a bit of a battering. From hugging hoodies to dreaming up Brexit, from Margaret Thatcher to Kemi Badnock, he's both led the right and seen where it's going next. You do identity politics, except the identity that you're attacking is Muslim.

11:42No, what we're attacking is Islamism and political Islam. Around the world, the right is firmly on the rise. So what does Gove and the rest of the right really want? This is Radical Thinking, a new series from The Guardian with me, Aditya Chakraborty. Out Saturday in your Politics Weekly feeds.

12:08Rob, you of course spoke to some of the employees of Multiverse. what did they say about the impact that this was having on them they've talked to me about kind of the the feeling of it being kind of a remorseless system and on the stress that comes from it and the fact that some of them are losing sleep worrying about the scores that they're getting say you're doing sort of six seven hours of kind of condensed work you know put some breaks around that and you're being monitored for six to seven hours it's exhausting i've noticed that there's there's some sort of new lingo that started to emerge around it so for example there was one example of a boss who'd gone to their worker and said i've heard some signals about you and they were like what do you mean signals and that was signals from the ai about the way that you were behaving which was a kind of like that's a strange thing this is new office speak new office speak yeah i've heard some signals about right it's not gossip it's signals it's what the ai even more mysterious and therefore more more worrying it's a bit odd i don't even know what that means i did speak to one person who's been you know seeking therapy about it because it was causing them such anxiety that they were very worried about their performance levels i'll quote someone you're being watched it's different from occasionally being listened to for compliance purposes you're being monitored absolutely every word that you say and every time that you utter something it just feels really dystopian it does sound like a pretty miserable environment to be working in has there been any kind of scientific work on this yet or was this just all way too early for science to have had a say yet it's quite early but there have been some papers done over the last two or three years there is a kind of associate a positive association between surveillance and what are called sort of secondary work stresses so under surveillance you're more likely to feel under job pressure you're more likely to feel a reduced sense of autonomy and you're more likely to feel that your privacy is being violated more anecdotally when you kind of hear from what the meta employees were saying when they were having their keystrokes monitored you know they were talking about feeling super uncomfortable and also when it was discussed kind of on message boards the sort of angry face emojis were just pouring out i think there was a study too of or there is a study underway of some police officers who are often wearing the body mounted cameras so all the time they're kind of producing data about their work and with that being kind of monitored and on the calls that they're making constantly they don't have those moments to sort of decompress in between jobs if you like and they're looking at that kind of really high intense level of energy and adrenaline happening all the time in the worker's body and how that will affect things and there was this other study i think was at the university of wyoming where i think they looked at people being monitored in this kind of way and it seemed like they might actually be less likely to comply with all the the kind of requirements and actually become sort of you know more deviant in their behavior i don't know if that's a protest but there was another study on that yeah i mean that's there's a classic thing isn't it when you take someone's autonomy away they actually end up behaving worse and what they found there was a paradox really wasn't it so it's monitoring paradoxically creates conditions for more deviance by i think the thing is diminishing the worker's sense of agency and that means they're kind of less morally engaged with the work that they're doing, they feel less responsible.

15:50And that creates a kind of more rebellious worker. So there is a risk that this could massively backfire if employees just become rebellious or stressed out. But presumably, this is just the thin end of the wedge as this technology becomes adopted by more and more companies. Where do you see this all going? Well, I think we're already starting to see it become an issue for trade unions. I think it's going to be a new kind of front line in industrial relations as you know as well as pay and other kind of conditions i think that there's going to be also a kind of i suspect a new dynamic where if you resist monitoring and you say you don't want to be monitored does that then start to make you look suspicious to the managers and so there could be a kind of world in which you have pro surveillance pro-tech pro-monitoring people who are happy to have this sort of almost kind of paternalistic technology hovering over them and people who aren't and then i think there's the the topic that we talked about earlier which is after a while of monitoring these employees so much using an ai does the ai then just say do you know what i could just be doing this myself you know i've worked out from these millions of hours of information that i've garnered from these white collar workers that i could just replicate this and i could actually teach myself how to do this and you know i don't think it will be long until companies start to look at the kind of wealth of data they've got about the way that their employees operate and think well how could we actually start to use that to our advantage as well and then we can all go and lie on the beach and live in the world of what are the an ai can take care of the world for us right these dreams Bring on the future.

17:42Bring on the future.

17:47Thanks again to Robert Booth. You can read his reporting at theguardian.com. And that's all from us. This episode was produced by Josh and Chana. The sound design was by Ross Burns. And the executive producer was Ellie Bury. We'll be back on Tuesday. See you then.

18:12This is The Guardian.

From the publisher
Workers have always been monitored by their bosses, first through output targets, and then via computer software labelled ‘bossware’. But AI is transforming the capabilities of these systems, processing huge volumes of data to provide minute-by-minute accounts of activity, and productivity. To find out more, Ian Sample hears from UK technology editor Robert Booth. He explains which sectors are adopting this approach, why they are doing it, and how it could end up being counterproductive.. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/sciencepod

More from Science Weekly

All episodes