In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Money - Episode 136: Are Labour’s Growth Goals Meaningless?
Overview In this episode of "The Rest Is Money," hosts Steph McGovern and Robert Peston are joined by Praful Nargund, founder of the Good Growth Foundation, and Chris Curtis, MP for Milton Keynes North. They discuss Labour's growth targets as outlined by Rachel Reeves and delve deep into what growth means for everyday people in the UK.
Key Themes
The Concept of Growth
- Definition of Growth: The episode seeks to clarify what economic growth means to ordinary citizens, beyond the abstract economic metrics often cited by politicians.
- Public Perception: A significant finding from the research conducted by Praful and Chris indicates a disconnect between political rhetoric about growth and public understanding or expectations.
Research Insights
- Methodology: The research included polling over 2,000 people and focus groups specifically targeting voters who switched from the Conservative Party to Labour.
- Key Findings:
- Many people view growth skeptically, associating it with benefits for the wealthy rather than tangible improvements in their own lives.
- While economic growth is recognized as essential, it is often seen as detached from personal experiences, with concerns centered around cost of living rather than GDP.
Cost of Living Concerns
- Primary Concern: The cost of living is seen as the primary economic issue, overshadowing the concept of GDP growth. Participants indicated that rising living costs negate any wage increases, leading to skepticism about the benefits of growth.
- Personal Experiences: Examples were shared, including stories from local food bank operators showcasing the struggles faced by working-class individuals relying on community support.
Skills and Training
- Importance of Skills: There was a consensus that improving skills and training opportunities could bridge the gap between economic growth and personal well-being.
- Public Sentiment: Participants expressed a desire for policies that enhance skills training, viewing it as a pathway to achieving better job opportunities and economic stability.
Political Implications
- Trust in Politicians: A major theme throughout the discussion was the erosion of trust in politicians. There is a growing sentiment that government does not adequately address the needs of ordinary people.
- Active Government Role: Both Praful and Chris emphasized the need for a government that actively supports citizens and small businesses to foster economic growth that is felt at the community level.
Challenges for Labour
- Perception vs. Reality: The Labour Party's focus on growth needs to be aligned with tangible outcomes that people can see and feel in their daily lives, including better public services, health care access, and improved living standards.
- Communication Strategy: There is a need for more effective communication from politicians regarding the benefits of growth and how it translates into real-life improvements.
Conclusion The discussion highlighted a critical disconnect between political narratives around economic growth and the lived experiences of everyday citizens. For Labour's growth goals to resonate, they must focus on reducing the cost of living, enhancing skills training, and rebuilding trust in government. The episode called for a more engaged and active government approach that prioritizes the needs of ordinary people over abstract economic metrics.
---
Additional Information
- Hosts: Steph McGovern and Robert Peston
- Guests: Praful Nargund and Chris Curtis
- Main Takeaway: Economic growth must be tangible and directly beneficial to the lives of everyday citizens for it to be meaningful and effective.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:10Hello and welcome to The Rest is Money with me Steph McGovern and with me Robert Pairsten Now today we are going to talk about growth. We love talking about growth, don't we? Growth makes the world go round, we're not going to complain about it. It's the reason we get up in the morning. But the reason we're talking about it today in particular is because we are joined by Prafful Nagland and Chris Curtis, who have been working on a brand new report. And it's all about, they say, what real people think about growth and what politicians are missing when they set these targets for growth or when they talk about how they're going to achieve it.
0:43And, you know, that's something that really matters to us. It's something we talk about a lot on the show. It's that tangibility of what it actually means in the everyday. I mean, that's completely right. And look, just to be clear, this is not their views, Praffle and Chris. They did an opinion poll survey involving, I think, more than 2 ,000 people. And they've conducted lots of focus groups. They have focused particularly on those voters who switched from the Tories to Labour last time round. So I think it's very important when we have this discussion with them, that listeners bear that in mind.
1:19But the point of their research was to basically get to the bottom of what growth means to most British people. and I have to say when I read their report I was slightly shocked actually by their findings Were you? Because I'm the opposite I read it and thought yeah this is what I feel like I'm hearing all the time from people That's why this is an interesting conversation to have with them because the bottom line of what they found out is that when Keir Starmer as he does pretty much every time he appears in public talks about the importance of growth I think you'll find as a result of this research that what he thinks people are hearing is not, in fact, what they're hearing.
2:06It's worth just saying who they are as well. Chris Curtis is an MP who came in this year, isn't he? He's an MP in Milton Keynes. Yeah, brand new MP. Former pollster, wasn't he? He was at YouGov. He was a senior pollster at YouGov and did, I think, some pretty important measures of British public opinion in the run-up to the election. Yeah, and Praffle as well runs the Good Growth Foundation, which is a think tank he set up. looking into all of this. But he's ran quite a successful fertility business called Create Fertility, which his mum had started and so has that business side of life to him as well.
2:39He's got a business background. He's also, let's say, got some scars from having actually, at the last election, got himself into politics as the Labour candidate for Islington North. And those of you who are students of British politics will know that Islington North is the seat where Jeremy Corbyn has been MP for decades. He was thrown out of the Labour Party. It was Praffle versus Corbyn. And I don't think it was, let's say, the politest of constituency battles. Praffle lost. He's bruised. He's scarred. But he's still standing. And he's not talking about that today. So here is our interview with Chris Curtis and Prafful Norgun from the Good Growth Foundation.
3:29Chris, Prafful, thank you for joining us. It's really interesting, this research you've done, in terms of what public opinion is about growth. It's something Robert and I talk loads about. You know, what does growth actually mean to people? We talk about what GDP is, how it's measured and everything else. But what does it actually mean to people out there living life, trying to navigate through it? And this is what you've done research on, isn't it? Can you just tell us a bit about how you've ended up doing it, the background to this? We're the Good Growth Foundation and people are constantly asking me, what does good growth mean?
3:59And we thought rather than telling people, we'd actually go and try and find out what growth that people would like to see looks like. And I think, you know, in the past, there's been this received wisdom that a growing economy, people generally think it's good for them. But actually, what we found is there's a bit of a gap there. And that's what we've had a deep look at. And so what are you focusing on with the work that you're doing, on the good or the growth? It's a really good question. I mean, some people say to me, sure, we just need any growth. And I think one of the key conclusions of our report is that actually there is a world where even, you know, growth could be taken as a signal of failure on the economy rather than as success, if it doesn't really translate into people's living standards and changed experience in their day-to-day life.
4:40Chris Curtis is also with us, now a Labour MP, was at YouGov. How did you do this research? How robust are these findings? Oh, incredibly robust. So it's a series of mixed methods. We had focus groups that were done earlier on in the process, and then some polling that went alongside it as well. So it really helped us to dig down just into exactly how the public interact with the economy. Because you'll know as much as anyone else, Robert, often the conversations that happen in Westminster in politics can become very, very distant from the conversations about people's ordinary life. And often the more time you spend down in Westminster, the more disconnected you get from real normal people's lives.
5:20So it's so important to be doing research on this, even if the topic is as big and significant to this government as economic growth. And just to be clear, this is a government that says its number one priority is getting the growth rate up. When you put that to the people that you've been talking to in both the big poll, couple of thousand plus people, plus your focus groups. What do they hear when Keir Starmer says that? Most people, I think, from the research that we've seen, understand the importance of economic growth. But we also need to make sure that we're explaining as we go along in this process, actually, why that economic growth can create all those other things that are really important to your life as well.
6:06I mean, one of the lines that the Chancellor has made perfectly clear, for example, is if economic growth in this country over the last 14 years had been the same as the, or last decade, had been the same as the OECD average, that'd be five grand on average in the pay pockets of every family in this country. That would be billions of pounds extra going to the Treasury in order to fund the National Health Service without having to make a penny difference to any tax rates. So actually making sure that we're telling the story about why growth has been one of, if not the biggest driver of the problems.
6:35Lack of growth has been one of the key drivers of the problems that this country has faced over the past 16, 17 years, and why getting that growth rate back up again is the most important thing in ensuring that we get back on track. One of the things that I was particularly interested in, because it's something Robert and I talk about a lot that was in your research, is about who growth actually benefits. And Praffle, this is something that came up as a big theme, didn't it? It's that people think growth benefits somebody else not them and so one of the things that you say praffle is for many people getting the growth rate up is for them failure because they see growth as rewarding privileged people and none of it coming to them and they're fed up yeah with the gap between them and and basically wealthier richer people getting even wider yeah that's very much the spectre from the research You know, we ask about what good growth means.
7:34People do think growth is important. They generally think it's good. As soon as you dig in a little bit further, they go, well, has it actually ever been that good for me? You know, they don't feel that the rising tide lifts all boats. If anything, they think growth always seems to benefit someone else over there, maybe big business or the wealthiest. And so when you ask them what would be that success measure, it's certainly not GDP. It's not the figures. It's those real changes in their lives. And in particular, this laser focus on the cost of living. Can I ask you, Steph, because, I mean, you know, you talk about this all the time.
8:09Does this resonate with you? If you, you know, where you live, you know, in the northeast, if you were just to talk to a random selection of people and you said to them, Keir Starmer wants to get the growth rate up, that must be great. what would they say to you they'd say that means nothing to me because so for example this week i met up with a lady who runs the food bank where i live it's a brilliant food bank in the sense of they're incredible to the local area but they've also managed their donations well at a time when they've massively reduced and demand has massively gone up and they're you know she was talking to me she'd come to see me because i'm a patron of the charity about what can we do to future proof and make sure they've still got everything.
8:52And for them, nothing has got better for years. It's just got worse and worse and worse. I was looking at the figures and it's gone from handing out a couple of food parcels every day to literally thousands a week. And this is one area. This is one part of like North Tyneside. It's not even, you know, a big area. It's one suburb of Newcastle rather than the whole of it. and so for people like her that she just she was really miserable about life she's a very much an optimistic woman she was a teacher for a long time she's gone into the charity sector as a volunteer and she just was like i don't i can't see this getting any better so all i need to focus on is how can we just get more donations rather than you know what what's happening to these people these are working poor as well so she's saying to me a lot of these people it's the pay packet is not seeing them through completely.
9:45So at the end of the month, they're having to come reluctantly to the food bank to get a parcel, even though they're working and they're doing as much as they can, I guess, with what they've got, and it's just not enough. So just to be clear, Prathol, you're saying, and this very much ties in with what Steph was just saying, that when you say what would be good for you if this government succeeds in this economic mission of getting growth up, what they come back to is they've got to reduce the cost of living. Overwhelmingly. I mean, the cost of living is the alpha and omega on the economy. It's seen as the cause of economic dysfunction and stagnation.
10:25And it's seen as the marker of whether or not the economy has got better, whether or not their cost of living pressures have eased. But the other thing which I thought was sort of bizarre, really, is how they, in a sense, understand this and experience this is the prices they pay for the stuff they need you know whether it's you know going to the supermarket or you know energy when you ask them what if pay goes up faster than prices that was somehow not so convincing to them i mean it's very much shaped by lived experience right so you know people have seen that prices are just shooting up all the time So there is a natural scepticism that if wages rise, their prices won't just eat into their wage packet even further.
11:10And that's very much the default position. So they want to see prices to fall. They want to see, you know, essentially the cost of their shopping basket come down. Is that what they're desperate for? I mean, literally in focus groups, people would talk about things used to costing X. Now they cost double or whatever it might be. And they'd mark success as when it costed X again. But not how much they're paid. Yes. And actually, we would ask them, you know, well, what about your wage increase? My bills will just go up. That's not to say that what we should be actively pursuing is deflation. I think the point is, is that the level of scepticism is high based on the experience over the last few years.
11:46And there is this deep desire to really see these personal visceral changes in their lives. I mean, we talked about, you know, you spoke about, you know, GDP rate or the growth rate. When we asked people, you know, what would you point to as, you know, an economic marker that would be important? They talked about productivity. They talked about wages. They didn't talk about GDP. But, you know, a person can be productive. But think about it, right? A person can be productive. Yeah. A person doesn't have a personal GDP number. No, but I'm interested that they've mentioned productivity then, because that is something that is really hard to measure and understand, I always think.
12:21But do you think that's more understandable than growth to people? Well, I think it's about what's intuitive, right? And one of the things that we talk about in the report is, you know, what is more intuitive? What does resonate? What will relate? And the things that resonated were all very much borne out and lived experience. If you think about health, for example, people quite naturally drew a connection between an NHS with very long waiting lists and an unhealthy society and the fact that the economy was stagnant and many people were too ill to work. Right. So they drew that productivity conclusion quite naturally and intuitively.
12:56The same on skills and training, which they really saw. I mean, that was probably the strongest, most intuitive policy area that people bought into skills and training. They saw as a game changer. Well, it links into this growth is something that benefits someone else. And the challenge can then become when a growth measure seems distant or far away or benefiting a narrow group of people. And sometimes even jobs, you know, more jobs. Well, if I'm not going to get that job, what does it mean to me? Or if I'm not going to get to use that infrastructure, what does it mean to me? But skills and training is an enabler.
13:27It suddenly shortens that distance between that thing over there, that big growth mission project, and my own lived experience. If not for me, then maybe my kids. So, you know, skills and training in particular, very, very popular. We're going to come back, I think, in a minute and just develop the whole skills, you know, what that actually means in practice. What could the government do that would connect with what people feel they need? But if I could just ask Chris, there is nothing that this government is currently doing which would reduce the cost of the shopping basket, right? I mean, it's not remotely on this government's agenda.
14:06Do you think yourself, on the basis of the research you've done, that there is any practical policy for this government in the space of trying to get the cost of these essentials down? I mean, I'm reminded, for example, that during the COVID crisis, President Macron in France did institute a policy of saying, but, you know, the price of these basics must not be higher than a certain amount. And he reached agreement with the big supermarket chains on that basis. In the last election, right, both candidates, both Kamala Harris and Trump spoke the language of getting prices down. Now, in practice, I suspect Trump will do absolutely.
14:53In fact, I suspect in practice, given what he's doing in terms of introducing tariffs, the opposite will happen. But nonetheless, it was a major theme in the American presidential election. Is there any way that a Labour chancellor can somehow grasp this agenda? So I'm probably slightly more optimistic on this side than the conversation that's been happening so far. I mean, take this argument a little bit further. The main reason why people are not getting this connection between where it sort of doesn't matter if wages go up without costs going up, that's really good for the amount of money in my pocket.
15:29The reason there's that cynicism about that is because people haven't been seeing it happening. So if we can actually prove it is possible to not have those price rises, but to start getting more money into people's pay packets, which will then increase the disposable income, the really important mission of this government, then we can alleviate that cynicism. But a lot of the difficulty with public opinion research like this at the moment, many of the challenges we face as a government, we talk a lot about the broken public services. We talk a lot about the broken economy and the lack of economic growth.
15:57But we're also operating in a context where, probably caused by those first two problems, voters have very little trust, very little faith that politics can provide the answers, that can provide the solutions to the issues that they've been facing in their life. And this needs to be the government. You know, a lot of what we do is sort of following using public opinion research. On this one, we just need to prove them wrong. Sure, they're cynical. Sure, they have low trust. But we need to be the government that proves them wrong. We need to prove that we can be the people that work towards an economy that operates again.
16:30We need to be the people that show that those problems they're facing in their lives can be solved by government and by politicians. And by doing so, we can start that really difficult, really hard process of building trust back up in politics again. It's obviously getting prices down, going back to an era that we had in the 1970s of price controls is what you might say fashionable in political circles at the moment. But Praffle, telling British people who you've been talking to, they're wrong, that this is what we should be doing is, I mean, it's quite tricky there. I wouldn't say that sounds like a route to electoral nirvana.
17:07The challenge with price controls is that it does in the end actually have to work. I mean, one of the things that we got quite clearly from the research is that, you know, the proof is in the pudding. Will money in their pocket actually increase? Will they actually see a change in their living standards? And the challenge often with price controls is that the costs just end up somewhere else in the system and you end up, you know, maybe with queues and the world changed in other negative ways. And so the question then becomes actually, you know, yes, they start with scepticism. But can you reset the dial on that?
17:37Can you actually get that productivity, that wage growth to happen in a way that does genuinely outpace the cost of their goods? And actually, to be fair, quite a lot of things are happening that are pushing in that direction. You know, you've got the Employment Rights Bill, which is going to raise the floor on standards and work. You've got minimum wage increase. You've got lots of big things on infrastructure happening, which will hopefully corral investment. So all of these things may well actually end up with, you know, disproving them to some extent. I was interested as well that, you know, we again, because of the fact I live in the north and Robert's down here in the south, we often talk about the north south divide.
18:11But in this research, what you guys found from talking to people as well is there's divide within the regions and that. And I actually agree that that is the bigger problem because, you know, it's that there'll be cities that see a lot of investment and then the kind of areas outside of it and the towns and whatever else outside that don't see the investment, that feel hard done by. And there's that. I suppose it's a bit like when you are a Middlesbrough fan, you know, you're a diehard Middlesbrough fan and will always, you know, football I'm talking about. And, you know, you will always go against, you know, you'll always support the North apart from when it comes to something like football.
18:48you hate the Mackhams, the people from Sunderland, you hate the Geordies. And it's like that. But yet when you're not in the area, you're like, all the Northerners are all together, we all support each other. It's the North versus the South until it comes to football. And it's a bit like that. When you dig down, there are these big divides. Yeah, you're completely right. And the conversation is often had between disparities between London and the South East and the rest of the country. But this growth happens to someone else does feed into much more local environments. I mean, I remember a chap from Wakefield talking about how he always felt Leeds was the place that got all the investment and all the opportunity.
19:23And I was born in Bradford originally. You know, you know regional rivalries, right? And it comes to actually some of the challenges around devolution that we found, that sometimes people can get their head around how this would actually work in practice, especially when they see these divides even in their local areas. Really interesting, though, Chris, just on this, the government's got to prove, you know, the people wrong that it's about you know getting prices down for me as somebody who is you know basically paid to watch the political game and comment on it the thing that that the government doesn't seem to get is they do talk about growth the whole time your report says this is broadly but you know paraphrasing too nebulous a concept for most people you've said it should all be about the government proving over the years that's in government that it is improving living standards but one of the great lessons for example of trump's victory is if you want to believe that that is what you are doing you've also got to talk about it morning noon and night and let's be clear this is not a government that talks i mean it talks about growth it doesn't talk about making people better off as much as you say they have to so i think that we should be talking a lot more and in our language using a lot more talking about the ordinary everyday economy that people experience rather than those top line um concepts i i certainly think that that's a that's a reasonable argument for you to make robert um and we certainly need to be doing that look i mean in the speech that the prime minister set out his milestones we did start to see some of that shit the economic metric that we're going to be measuring ourselves on is, is there more disposable income in the pockets of people in every part of this country?
21:11Because yes, growth is the most important mission of this government. But if that growth doesn't mean leads more money in people's pockets right across this country, then it will be a mission that has still failed. And to the same extent, that's one of the reasons why the economic growth that we've seen in the US didn't lead to the Democrats being reelected, because it wasn't growth that was felt in ordinary people's pockets so we do need to insure at the same time but let's be clear about that it was in people's pockets they just didn't feel it was it was the vibe the problem was not the economic reality the economic reality is biden made most people better off but the vibe was wrong people didn't believe it well that i'm i'm not sure there were lots of metrics uh under which uh the biden uh economic reality wasn't felt by a lot of ordinary people so i'm not sure that's quite as clear cut as you're I can give you the data.
21:59The data is they were better off. They just didn't believe it. We're sort of getting into this quite complex argument about the politics and the public opinion and the reality. But it is also incredibly important that we ensure as politicians, as we're going through this process of kickstarting the British economy, as we're going through some of the difficult decisions that need to happen in order to do so, we also need to make sure, as you say, that we're talking about it, we're talking about the benefits of it, and we're using language that is rooted in people's everyday lives. Else, you know, we're not going to be able to take people on that journey with us.
22:27Yeah, it does. That's the fundamental thing. It's the point you made about food banks as well. But it's also the point, even if you're not the sort of person who's at that level of using food banks, in recent years, it's people who used to go on a foreign holiday every year and haven't been able to do so. It's people who used to like taking their family out for a meal out or a couple of meals out at a restaurant and currently can't afford to do so. It's about all of those small cutbacks and inconveniences that people now have in their lives. Basically, because we've had an economy that hasn't been functioning in my adult lifetime.
22:56And my God, it would be so good to be able to give people those small luxuries back in their lives. I would just add as well, it's the small business owners and people like that too. That's the ones that I'm seeing locally who are really taking the hit. It's worth saying on this, is it price? Is it something else? You're right. Trump, even Farage have really cottoned on to the cost of living being at the heart of the economic agenda. But when you talk to people and listen to them in the focus groups, they talk about not being able to afford luxuries. They talk about their high streets and their communities and the crime and all the other visible signs that life isn't good anymore.
23:32And there is this general sense of, you know, actually quite a strong despondency about the country. I mean, we we asked people a fun question, you know, how would you describe Britain, Britain's economy as a car? And I think, you know, the kind of most common answers we got were things like Ford Fiesta, Reliant Robin, Old Banger. There was this gentle despair about the state of the country. Not your Citroen. Not my Citroen. Citroen was on the list somewhere. I love my Citroen. Is Britain your Citroen? I think it's more my dad's Talbot Horizon. Oh my goodness. That's taking us back in time. No, back in the day.
24:12So look, there's much more to dig into so we'll come back to all this in a minute or two.
24:21everyone knows who listens to this show that i'm obsessed with skills and i know robert is as well it's interesting that that was a big priority because the the sense that i get from people all the time is people want to work they don't want to be on benefits the the people who are for example a family friend who's on benefits at the moment worked for a long time got made redundant can't has tried for at least a year now to get another job and really struggled and is you know is older, doesn't feel like they can work in retail, even though they're applying. They keep applying for jobs. They're applying for absolutely everything.
24:56They're applying for supermarkets. And they're just struggling to even get in. And they don't want to be on benefits. They want to work. And so that skills, that re-skilling has got to be part of how we get growth. Yeah, and it is incredibly popular. I mean, you know, it rang towards the top pretty much whenever we were testing which levers are the ones that people care about. it's very tangible, it's very personable. As I said, if it's not for you, it's for your kids. And it even works at bridging the gap between industries that might seem far away. I remember in one focus group, people talking about, you know, why do we need to help the digital sector?
25:32They're already doing really well. Why do they need any more help? But skills is this, you know, if I can get the digital skills and I could go and work in that sector, it completely changes the conversation. And I think actually a lot of the time when growth is talked about as something very far away, skills and training is this great mechanism of opening up to everyone yeah but it feels like chris there's not enough happening in that area in terms of making people feel valued for the skills they have and understanding they're transferable i know so many people who feel like they're being left out now by society you know bridget phillisman's talking about stuff in school education there's very little about the kind of adult lifelong learning that's going to be really important as the population gets older and keeping people in work what are your thoughts on that i think we have been doing quite a lot already and i know that there'll be a lot more policy area to come and i'm from uh mp for milton keens i've got the open university or any my patch you know brilliant labor invention which is really um focused on lifelong learning and i think that the connection that praffle was trying to make there's a really important point a lot of the reason for a sort of lack of trust in the economy and politics is political failures in recent years.
Read the full transcript
26:44But I think we also need to acknowledge that the economy is moving on a lot faster than it used to. The pace of change in our economics is substantially quicker. You know, we talk about the fact that most people will not just have one career anymore, like they would have done 30, 40 years ago. And therefore, if we want to have a successful, nimble economy in that economic context that isn't leaving people behind, it is so critically important that people are able to keep up. And that involves having a skills programme that allows people yes sure to have those are those apprenticeships those training programs earlier on at the start of their career but ensuring people have those abilities to move from one career to another the lifelong learning entitlement that we'll be be introducing reskilling programs the way that we're the changes that we're making to the apprenticeship levy to allow people to do those reskilling retraining programs that's so important ensuring that everyone can continue to have a good fantastic job in whatever they want to do and however they can reach their potential for their whole life, not just thinking about how to give people the skills they need in their early 20s.
27:44And I should say I was part of David Blunkett's skills task force in the run-up to the election. And as Chris mentioned, there is the reform of the apprenticeship levy, which should make things much more modular, which we recommended, which has taken place. Which hasn't worked so far, the apprenticeship levy. No, the apprenticeship levy has been a disaster from start to finish. We have far fewer apprenticeships today than 10 years ago. People are still worried about it's not going to work, though. People are still saying that. The reformed levy. Yeah, people are still worried that people, businesses will use it to just do internal training and not really use it for bringing in, you know, reskilling and bringing in new people.
28:12Well, I think to be fair, even, you know, the previous body, IFATE, had made a lot of moves which were trying to, you know, stop that type of activity happening so apprenticeships were better targeted. The key thing is there's this new body coming along, which our group recommended, the group I was part of pre-election, the creation of this body called Skills England. And I think Skills England has probably got a really big part to play, not just in actually achieving growth, but in telling this growth story. Because as Chris said, this is about a large number of people that have been felt they've been cut out of anything.
28:43And to be honest, they are basically right. Yeah, they are. Even in a stagnant economy. To no fault of their own. Well, exactly. Even in a stagnant economy, if you plot incomes over the last 10 years in real terms, it's pretty flat. Right? You plot return on capital over that period. It's still pretty healthy. So they're not wrong to point out that, you know, someone does seem to be doing much better and that they demand more of what growth might mean for them in their lives. And so, yes, it has to be tangible. You have to find ways to link it to their personal lived experience. Skills is one way.
29:14You know, health is another. And that's something that's really visceral that people feel, if not for themselves, but their families or their elder ones or their loved ones. Transport is another area which people really feel and understand in its kind of broadest sense. Yes, buses and trains, but also potholes. All of these things are very much your lived experience, and those will be the markers that people test against. Transport's always really interesting, I think, because it's, again, another example where politicians can get off and get obsessed with the kind of transport they use and forget about the kind of transport programmes that are needed.
29:45Or people in Westminster can often get it. The journalist, the press can often get obsessed with the kind of transport methods they use, trains, and forget. that most people in this country are reliant on buses or reliant on cars and roads, and actually how we can ensure that we're improving that infrastructure and not just focusing on railways, albeit railways are an incredibly important thing for us to do. There was one woman in Derby. If you don't read the whole report, you just read this quote. It basically sums it up in one go. And she just said, you know, they need to show me the evidence that growth is happening.
30:13I need to see it in my wage packet. I'll believe it when I see it in improved education in schools, infrastructure, fewer potholes on my road, And, you know, I think it was a better NHS as well. You know, it's all things that are personal, visceral. The thing that I always am struck by when we do this kind of research is it sort of demonstrates to me that governments are always slightly behind where, you know, British people know we have to be. You said, which I was really struck by, that British people know that productivity matters, knows that how much they produce really matters to their living standards.
30:54We just had this artificial intelligence action plan. The one thing that was not in it, which is absolutely central to productivity, is a program to roll out AI to all businesses across the UK. There's no mention of it in the action plan. There's no mention of how do you disseminate AI, particularly to small businesses that are way behind the curve on all of this. They're obviously riskfully well in that because obviously some people's jobs may be eliminated. But there's also absolutely no doubt that for vast swathes of British employment, you know, when you equip somebody with an AI co-pilot, for example, their output increases massively.
31:36And, you know, in a well-functioning economy, particularly where you've got a government keeping an eye on it, that will translate into much higher wages. But that is not something you hear from the Prime Minister or from Peter Kyle at all. And it was not in the action plan. There were lots of other things to do with the infrastructure that we need for AI in this country. But this is a very simple thing that any government could take the lead on. And they're not. A lot of those things that are in the action plan, well, all of those things that are in the action plan are going to help ensure that.
32:06I'm not asking you to defend it, Chris. I'm just making a very straightforward point, which I'm afraid is just a fact. It's not there. I take the observation, but I think that generally speaking, this government is very optimistic about AI. And there are lots and lots of things we're doing very early on into office in order to make this the kind of country where we can deliver significantly more AI projects that help businesses, public services across the country. And the reason we're doing that so quickly and so boldly, we're being far more ambitious with this than the European Union, for example, is because we know how important it is to get our product everything out.
32:39You're not on here to sell the government. You're on here to talk about your report. But it's linked to the report, right? What Praffle was saying earlier was about the reason people get productivity is because they can see it in their own lives. They can see it in their workplace. They can see people in public services that they're engaging with where they're getting really frustrated that they're not being as productive as they could be. And I'm saying there's a role for the government to take a lead on this. And perhaps the most central question of our age, which is this AI industrial revolution, they're not doing the big, simple thing they should be doing.
33:11I've got another point, though, to put to you here. We're going to get this great, really important growth speech from Rachel Reeves next week. We already know that one of the biggest things in it will be a new runway at Heathrow, a third runway for vast numbers of British people. That's totally irrelevant. And I mean, your report shows that. I mean, look, our point is, is that, look, you've got to grow the economy and people need to feel it. So, you know, Britain has a growth problem. It's worse than maybe we think it is because it's not just about the problem itself. It's about how people feel it.
33:42There might be lots of things that you might do that don't necessarily resonate. But how do you find ways to connect it? Big infrastructure projects. Do you make a big deal of the skills and training that will need to take place in order to make them happen? Is there redistribution of the proceeds that come from that into the things that people really care about? And going back to your point on AI, which I think is important, when we asked people, who do you think is responsible for economic success when we've had it, they pointed to ordinary people, right? And the next biggest group they pointed to were the SMEs in their local area.
34:14So there is that, you know, it's coming back to the same point. So they don't trust government at all, basically. Well, as Chris said, there is a period where trust in government is really corroded. It is low. And so actually what they do want is active government. That came out very strongly. Active government, getting behind ordinary people, those smaller businesses. But we also know, and I used to run a business, and I went through the different stages of it being small, medium and large. This was the fertility business. Exactly, yeah. And look, when you run a business, and especially for SMEs, if you want that diffusion of technology, you often do need large amounts of investments, especially in bigger companies, to drag SMEs up.
34:49And a lot of that work seems to be taking place now with these big infrastructure announcements, with pension funds coming together and pooling investment. And so it is all tied together. It is also about telling that story, though. And I think ordinary people have to be at the heart of it. The overriding thing that I get, and I agree with a lot of what has been said in your research, I agree that that's what I hear from people as well. But what really stands out to me is they really don't trust politicians. Chris, does that not make you feel utterly miserable? Yeah, I mean, I've moved from a job where I was surveying people about how little trust voters have in politicians to one where I'm a politician that they have little trust in.
35:29I mean, I suppose from my perspective, like, rather than letting it get me down, I see it as something that I need to work in my day to day life, everything I do in order to fix, right? It would be easy to go out, I just don't trust politicians. So what I do what I like. actually one of the metrics that i think we should measure ourselves as a government grave and everything else are we finally starting to turn the tide and rebuild people's faith in us i think that comes from delivery you know that's important turn when is that when is that point because this is what we asked richel reaves when we interviewed it's what we ask pretty much everyone is when when do we know when are we gonna i know you can't say it in three weeks or whatever but what does life look like and when when we can go yes it is better and you've helped you've helped Chris do that.
36:14I think the parliamentary term is not an unreasonable timeline to set out your ambitions because you're right if you constantly focus on trying to make things better three weeks in the future you're not going to focus on making things better five ten years in the future so let's take the parliamentary term as a reasonable timeline what do I want to see by the time that I'm potentially going back to the voters in Milton Keene's North and asking them to vote for me again I want them to feel like they've got more money in their pocket. So for many people, I used to have to use a food bank. I don't have to use it anymore.
36:43For many people that I could afford to go on holiday this year, I haven't been able to for the past few years. It's being able to get an NHS appointment and a GP appointment when you need one. It's thinking if you've got kids that they've got the opportunities at school in the classroom where they're able to focus on learning. And it's seeing a high street that's starting to blossom again. And it's knowing that there'll be police officers who are able to deal with crime in our local communities. And it will be as a consequence of achieving many of those things that they're suddenly looking to me or many other politicians right across the country and thinking, you know what, maybe these are people who actually can start to work to fix the problems that are facing my community and my life after we've seen 14 years where politicians haven't been achieving that.
37:27Maybe, but I mean, the thing that, you know, I would be anxious about and thinking about literally all the time if I'm in your position or the prime minister's position, I would look at Donald Trump and many of us would say that the things that he's already announced he's doing and wants to do will not improve Americans' lives. They may, in fact, end up damaging the quality of Americans' lives. But my goodness, he announces and projects this stuff with extraordinary sunny optimism and confidence about the future of America. And, you know, one of the things that comes out from your research is people are fatalistic.
38:13They're fed up. They don't have confidence that things will get better. And against that backdrop, being told, which the prime minister has done all the time since he won the election, that it's all really difficult and it's all the last lot's fault and they inherited this black hole and every time any minister stands up, they basically say, don't blame me, blame my predecessor. Actually, the problem with that is it undermines confidence. People listen to that and they think, you're in charge now. Take responsibility. Fix it. And the more that they say, this is not my fault that it's also hard, it's the last lot's fault.
38:51Do you know who that benefits? It benefits Nigel Farage because he's not tainted by any of this stuff. The risk I think you're running, or the government is running, not you obviously, in the approach that it's taking, is that this undermining of trust will just, when it comes to the two main parties, will actually be increased. What people want is a message of hope from the current leaders. Yes, there is huge corroded trust in politicians. I mean, we're not the first people to say that. but we also found a really strong yearning for an active government that gets behind people so it's not all is lost you know people still they still think politicians can be the people to help them yes and and it is ultimately about being really clear about the changes they want to see in their life so that you can deliver against that and that's a big part of why we've done this piece of work so that we can you know help to guide guide the path to how you tick that box i think we should let them go to get on with all of these great things they're going to achieve We've got to try and cheer up Keir and Rachel, I think, don't we?
39:52We should be more optimistic about the future. I'm in absolutely no doubt whatsoever that Britain's brightest days are ahead of it. But I think, you know, you don't achieve that by standing up on a stage in front of a load of people and selling a sunny message. You deliver that by doing the hard work that is necessary to create that better future. But the problem is, and Kane's made this point decades ago, animal spirits matter. Right. And yes, you've got to deliver, but you've also got to have leaders that look as though they've got confidence that it's going to be delivered. And people hear our best days are ahead of us.
40:28Most people groan. Oh, God, how many times have I heard that? You know, what they want is the combination of sort of frame of mind plus the policies. And look, we're doing that. We're going to start building 1.5 million new homes in this country so that my generation has been taken off the housing ladder can afford a house again. We're going to get more police officers on our streets. We're going to get GDP growing again. We're going to crowd in all of that investment from big international companies. We might, God knows, even manage to get a big international theme park built right in the centre of England.
41:00It's really exciting projects that are going on in this country that England is supporting. Yes, that's going to be one of the futures of the British economy, potentially, is more roller coasters, a growing economy, more money in people's pockets. and a government finally after 14 years. I think roller coasters is on the right occasions and in the right places. I think we've had enough of a roller coaster politics, definitely. Stop being a roller coaster, NB. Whatever you think about the kind of despondency in the economy right now, there's lots to be optimistic in this country about and lots to be proud of.
41:34I mean, I come from a family who came here with nothing and our lives were transformed in this country. Steph and I are great believers in the UK. I'm also an optimist. It will be, but I just want to say one thing. it will be like you've ran a business and you're really successful create fertility you know grew from nothing made it brilliant that that that they're the people i think it's that that changes the economy and does well for us it's not it's not the i don't think did politicians help you while you were running that business no we're not not really but i mean look the thing is is that what we heard from the british public is they want to be part of rebuilding britain that's why they want those personal entrepreneurs like you that'll do that it won't be chris sorry Chris.
42:13We can make their lives easier. We can help and support them. Politicians can help make it happen and people are yearning for that government that would actually make it happen for them to put more money in their pockets so they can actually go out and spend in shops, take a risk, start a business, get the skills so they can get on, be healthy so they don't have to worry about long queues in the NHS. Let's have a group hug everyone. I think let's have a hug and put our listeners out of their business. Yeah. Brilliant. Great to talk to you. Thank you very much guys. All the best. Bye. Thank you.
42:39That's it from us on The Rest is Money. Bye bye. Goodbye. Thank you.
From the publisher
Steph and Robert are joined by Praful Nargund, founder of the Good Growth Foundation, and Chris Curtis, MP for Milton Keynes North, to speak about Rachel Reeves’s growth targets. They consider what growth actually means to everyday people, whether it’s felt evenly, or if Labour should be prioritising something else altogether.
Sign up to our newsletter to get more stories from the world of business and finance.
Email: restismoney@gmail.com
X: @TheRestIsMoney
Instagram: @TheRestIsMoney
TikTok: @RestIsMoney
goalhangerpodcasts.com
Assistant Producer: India Dunkley
Producer: Ross Buchanan
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
