In short
Nik Bhatia argues Bitcoin is in a “structural bull market” driven by compressed volatility and steady multi-year accumulation, potentially extending beyond the usual four-year having-driven cycle. He expects Bitcoin to trade around 2–3x realized value (e.g., realized value ~$50k implies ~$100k–$150k), with pullbacks of ~20–33% possible without a prior-style “winter.”
Guest background
Nik Bhatia is a macro/Bitcoin analyst behind Bitcoin Layer and its liquidity-focused work (Liquidity Maxi index). He previously worked on the trading desk under Fed chairs Yellen and Bernanke and describes himself as a “corporate finance tourist,” teaching corporate finance and fixed-income minutiae.
Key claims
MVRV/realized-value oscillation replaces blow-off tops; volatility compression prevents 4x MVRV and reduces winter risk. Market maturity includes options/hedging across vehicles (e.g., IBIT, MSTR) that dampen implied volatility. Macro liquidity is improving via collapsing treasury volatility despite rates around ~4.3% on 10-year.
Notable examples
Strategy’s large spot holdings vs smaller firms’ coin purchases; treasury volatility/MOVE index “red weeks”; discussion of Powell vs Trump and SOFR; expectation of ~$210k in 1–2 years.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOBitcoin's Current Bull Market and Price Predictions
0:00 to 1:31
Analyzing Bitcoin's potential price movement and market dynamics.
“Liquidity is exploding higher as we speak.”
Bitcoin Market Dynamics and Historical Context
2:52 to 5:00
Discussing Bitcoin's market characteristics and its evolution over time.
“I want to talk about macro with you, but we've got to start on Bitcoin.”
The Concept of Cycles in Bitcoin
5:00 to 9:10
Exploring the idea of cycles and whether the current market is breaking traditional patterns.
“And that's where a lot of my analysis is living right now.”
Market Maturity and Volatility Management
9:10 to 14:00
Analyzing how market maturity impacts volatility and investment strategies.
“I would just say that actually you break out of a cycle and then you're more subject to global macro factors.”
Understanding Bitcoin Volatility and Market Dynamics
14:00 to 21:08
Explore how volatility in Bitcoin is influenced by options trading and market structures.
“And so all of that, you're talking about maturity.”
Analyzing Liquidity Cycles and Their Impact on Bitcoin
21:09 to 28:00
Discuss the relationship between liquidity cycles and Bitcoin's market cycles, including future predictions.
“First of all, do you think that's the case?”
Bitcoin Price Projections and Market Sentiments
28:00 to 35:00
Discusses Bitcoin's potential price movements in the coming years and market expectations.
“17, so seven, eight years from 10 to 100, another seven to a million, and you can really put it there and be like, yeah, the next order of magnitude is seven years away.”
Federal Reserve Chair Powell's Performance
35:00 to 39:04
Analyzes Jerome Powell's actions and effectiveness as Fed Chair compared to his predecessors.
“from where the government was setting them.”
Fed Independence and Political Influence
41:12 to 42:00
Explores the implications of potential changes in Fed leadership and its independence.
“That's interesting to hear because like I've always thought it was a bit of a charade that the Fed is independent.”
Fed Independence and Historical Context
42:00 to 43:10
Explore the importance of Fed independence in the current economic context, comparing it to historical events.
“Besant is on the tape today, again, saying that the independence of the Fed is so crucial to the health of the U.S.”
Show all 18 chapters
Rate Cuts and Economic Health
43:10 to 45:48
Discuss the arguments for and against cutting interest rates amidst a strong stock market.
“It didn't even really kick off until 1958 because of capital controls in Europe.”
Inflation Expectations and Treasury Yields
45:48 to 48:34
Examine how inflation expectations impact treasury yields and the dynamics of tips.
“And with more steepness in the yield curve, they have more protection for their profitability.”
Monetary Policy and Treasury Management
48:34 to 53:04
Analyze the potential changes in monetary policy with a new Fed chair and the role of treasuries.
“I mean, tips would be trading at 0 % or negative, which they had.”
Speculations on Future Economic Policies
53:04 to 56:00
Speculate on the implications of potential rate cuts and shifts in economic policies on Bitcoin and the economy.
“own version of the CARES Act or this, you know, big, beautiful bill cubed where they borrow and spend$10 trillion on energy grids and energy infrastructure and new nuclear power plants.”
Treasury Market Analysis
56:00 to 1:00:20
Learn about the current state of the treasury market and its implications.
“Every three months, like, one 20-year goes bad.”
Bitcoin and Federal Influence
1:00:20 to 1:00:56
Explore the relationship between federal policies and Bitcoin market dynamics.
“I don't think that a new Fed chair pumps Bitcoin.”
Key Insight on Bitcoin and Leadership
1:00:56 to 1:01:06
A surprising statement about the power of a new Fed chair on Bitcoin prices.
“Trump is not the one that's like, let's use Bitcoin to save the nation.”
Conclusion and Resources
1:01:06 to 1:01:56
Find out where to learn more about Bitcoin Layer and related works.
“He tells us that it's him pumping Bitcoin.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Nik Bhatia:Liquidity is exploding higher as we speak. If the gentle ascent continues, does that extend the bull market beyond our typical four-year cycle? I believe we could be in an environment now where the accumulation of Bitcoin remains steady for several years. I would expect the price to be between$100 ,000 and$150 ,000 here over the next several months. As that$50 ,000 realized price goes to$80 ,000, then the range then moves from, you know, to$160 ,000 to$240 ,000. I've never been able to put a year on Bitcoin hitting a million until this year. But I don't feel like it's speculative now. Now it's within our current market reach.
0:59Bitcoin is absolutely ripping. And in every bull market, there's always a new wave of investors. And with it, a flood of new companies, new products, and new promises. But if you've been around long enough, you've seen how this story ends for a lot of them. Some cut corners, take risks with your money, or just disappear. that's why when it comes to buying bitcoin the only exchange i recommend is river they deeply care about doing things right for their clients and are built to last with security and transparency at their core with river you have peace of mind knowing all their bitcoin is held in multi-sig cold storage and it's the only bitcoin only exchange in the us with proof of reserves there really is no better place to buy bitcoin so to open an account today head over to river.com forward slash wbd and earn up to 100 in bitcoin when you buy that's river.com forward slash wbd Do you wish you could access cash without selling your Bitcoin?
1:46Well, Ledin makes that possible. They're the global leader in Bitcoin-backed lending, and since 2018, they've issued over$9 billion in loans with a perfect record of protecting client assets. With Ledin, you get full custody loans with no credit checks or monthly repayments, just easy access to dollars without selling a single SAT. As of July 1st, Ledin is Bitcoin-only, meaning they exclusively offer Bitcoin-backed loans with all collateral held by Ledin directly or their funding partners. Your Bitcoin is never lent out to generate interest. I recently took out a loan with Ledin and the whole process couldn't have been easier.
2:18The application took me less than 15 minutes and in just a few hours I had the dollars in my bank account. It was super smooth. So if you need cash but you don't want to sell Bitcoin, head over to learn.ledin.io forward slash WBD and you'll get 0.25 % off your first loan. That's learn.ledin.io forward slash WBD. Mr. Nick Bartia, how you doing, man? I'm doing great, Danny. Good to be with you again. Good to be with you. We've not bumped into each other in a little while. This has been probably the longest I've not seen you for in a bit. Yeah, you're busy out in Australia, that's why. I know, just traveling all over the place.
2:52But things are going good, man. Bitcoin's absolutely ripping. I want to talk about macro with you, but we've got to start on Bitcoin. We're at just over 117k right now. That's pretty surreal on its own. But what's been your kind of take on the Bitcoin market over the last few months?
3:09Nik Bhatia:Slow and steady is my big takeaway for this bull market and a very impressive slow and steady because slow and steady is not really in Bitcoin's DNA, Danny, if we go back to its early history and even its recent history. So I find what I'm looking at more and more is the gentle ascent of Bitcoin's valuation relative to its underlying metrics. For example, realized value is one that I watch really closely. The gentle ascent versus a violent ascent. And if the gentle ascent continues, does that extend the bull market beyond our typical four-year cycle? I think anybody that claims they have the answer as to whether we are in another four-year having cycle or not is ahead of their own skis.
4:05Nik Bhatia:But I was joking around with our readers and community that I'm about 51 % to 60 % on the side that we have broken through this bull bear, this Bitcoin winter, two to three year Bitcoin winters every four years. I'm 51 % certain that we've broken out of that. But any odds maker will tell you that even 60-40 is 50-50. I mean, 60-40 is how an odds maker just tries to get the action when they don't know when they're really 50-50. So I say it as a joke, meaning I'm somewhere between 50-50 and 60-40 that we've broken out of that. But that is my, that's where I have a lot of my focus, trying to analyze that and trying to explain to the readers whether they should be thinking in terms of caution in six months or is it okay to get to have a aggressive strategy for the next six months, as opposed to a cautious strategy for the next six months.
5:23Nik Bhatia:And that's where a lot of my analysis is living right now. Yeah, I like that framing because I would be the same. And I think probably some of that comes down to a little bit of PTSD. So like last bull market, the super cycle narrative was pretty pervasive. And I've been really reluctant to say, has the cycle broken? Are we in a super cycle? Or is it even just like an elongated cycle. And that's probably the one that I think is most likely, that this may just end up getting dragged out for another six months, a year, for a few different reasons. One being, I think going into the midterms next year, Trump's going to want to run these things really hot, and that's going to be good for Bitcoin if that happens.
6:02But at the same time, I'm not willing to put my head on the line and say, no, the cycle's broken. So what would be the thing that breaks the cycle? Is this time like structurally very different?
6:15Nik Bhatia:I think that let's start with the word cycle. Because if we start with the word cycle, then we're assuming that, or let's actually start with the word super cycle. Because I don't even want to use that word. What I'm thinking about in terms of what, you know, the 60-40, what I'm thinking, is that I believe we could be in an environment now where the accumulation of Bitcoin remains steady for several years, and the Bitcoin price oscillates around a multiple to realized value. As realized value continues to increase, Bitcoin continues to chop around two to three times its realized value and just is in a structural bull market that can have periodic consolidations or even bear markets where Bitcoin falls 20, 30, 40 percent.
7:25Nik Bhatia:But it's in this oscillation around 2x its realized price. So right now the realize just crossed over$50 ,000 and the cap at a trillion. So two times that is$100 ,000. Three times that is$150 ,000. So I would expect the price to be between$100 ,000 and$150 ,000 here over the next several months. As that$50 ,000 realized price goes to$80 ,000, then the range then moves from, you know, to$160 ,000 to$240 ,000. And that we're oscillating. Now, if you go from$240 ,000 to$160 ,000, that's a pullback of 33%. That could happen even over a year. And it still wouldn't be this previous, what I would call the cycle, the having driven cycle, where you get these rises up to four times realized price, and then a crash back down to one or even 0.9.
8:33Nik Bhatia:So that is the way that I'm thinking about the next few years. And would that be a super cycle? I wouldn't really describe it as that. It wouldn't be the word to describe it because super cycle might mean that you just continue on into elevated valuation metrics. So not that. and then you use elongated cycle. Perhaps that could be a better way to describe what I'm thinking about is more of this, but I wouldn't even use elongated. I would just say that actually you break out of a cycle and then you're more subject to global macro factors. When rates get hot, it's going to be punitive, et cetera, that type of thing.
9:24Nik Bhatia:And then more on the adoption story. So the reason why, let's go back to the reason why we get a market price to realized price ratio of 4X. The reason why you would get 4X, for example, Bitcoin at 70 ,000 in 2021 when realized price was at around 15 ,000, 17 ,000. You get that type of gap when you don't have structural selling in the market. You have so much exchange-based, futures-based leverage trading, and you get this extreme profitability in the market that is not really tapped because you don't have structural selling. You don't have selling calls on ETFs. You don't have all of these vehicles that are managing the volatility down.
10:24Nik Bhatia:So one of the charts we've been charting is Bitcoin's trailing 30-day volatility historically. And it's just compressed, compressed, compressed. And the last three years, the volatility can be described as muted versus trailing five to 10 years. Even if you look at 2021, the volatility was so much more than it is today. And so this compressed volatility is the new structure of the market, I believe. And compressed volatility prevents the 4X MVRV ratio. And if you can never get to 4X, then you can avoid the winter. Because the winter is so much destruction on the technical chart. and so you avoid the destruction and I believe that the structural buyers for example the strategies of the world they would love to prevent overheated bitcoin prices because they believe that it could lead to a more winter-like environment in the in the you know subsequent months or years so that's I hope Danny I've answered a few of your questions in terms of how I'm thinking about this current bull market.
11:46Yeah, no, that makes sense. And so like what you're saying there is we won't get the blow off top like we have in previous cycles, but at the same time, it meets downside volatility. I'm in that 60-40 that we would avoid it.
11:58Nik Bhatia:Yes, I'm hoping that. Yeah. And I like that idea for a couple of reasons. One, just I would prefer that. But I also think it makes it way more sustainable for people to build Bitcoin businesses. because like when we have the, you know, two years of just down only, obviously like the first companies to go in the last cycle are all the fraudulent ones. But then there are real good Bitcoin businesses that just can't survive two years of negative price action. So I think that's a way more sustainable path if we can manage to do that. Is this just part of the market maturing? I do think that it is part of the market maturing.
12:34Nik Bhatia:And I use the word market structure a lot because it is about structure, options, hedging, calendar. Calendar is so important for risk management. If you can sell options one month, three months, six months, and 12 months forward, you can buy options three months and six months forward. You can plan, you can manage risk, And all of that mutes the volatility so that when you get, let's say we got a rise from today at 117 to 138, which is around my short-term, medium-term target. I'm not the only one that's looking at a 61.8 % Fibonacci extension from previous breakouts. Everyone has their stop orders and their call options and their structure around the risk.
13:29Nik Bhatia:and they understand that as this market matures, it's not gonna go from 138 to 170 in the blink of an eye. They're not gonna miss out. So they need to sell, lock in, create the income for themselves based on this basically herd mentality that we're not gonna get the blow off top. So I see the call option volume at higher strikes, and it's not just Bitcoin. It's IBIT. It's MSTR. There's so many vehicles. And so all of that, you're talking about maturity. It's the maturity of the structure, the vehicles, the options, the calendar. that's what suppresses the volatility because remember volatility is a function of options pricing not realized volatility realized volatility is statistical look back which in bitcoin is declining right the realized variance looking backwards is declining however However, implied volatility is based off of options prices.
14:49Nik Bhatia:And so if you are buying options, you are increasing volatility. But if you're an options seller, you knock that price of volatility back down. So it's the volatility sellers that have graduated from basically not even having the vehicles to now having the full suite of vehicles selling options on iBit, Bitcoin futures, MSTR across multiple vehicles across the entire calendar. The structural sellers physically mute implied volatility and dampen forward price action. That's how the stock market works, Danny. And so when we look at SPY options across the curve and across the calendar, that's how we manage risk in equities is that we know that there are levels at which volatility will – I'm sorry, the price will stop rising or stop falling because there's just a lot of buyers and sellers around those areas.
15:52Nik Bhatia:Bitcoin players will always get rinsed in the absence of good risk management. And so it is alarming, Danny, the number of companies that are popping up. You have to think then they're all competing over capital. so which ones are able to raise the most equity and of the equity holders how long are those equity holders going to be willing to be patient not all of these companies are going to be able to issue debt or borrow in order to sustain so the corporate finance expertise I don't know if you just caught the news that strategy released yet another vehicle, which is now targeting the shortest duration of fixed income money market funds, and is trying to offer a dividend or a yield with a stable net asset value at around 100 or par as we call it in money market fund land.
16:57Nik Bhatia:So completely giving up capital appreciation, but also combining with a short duration. This is sophisticated layering of the liability side of the balance sheet, liability plus equity, all of that to leverage the assets, leverage up the assets and buy as much Bitcoin as possible. Not everybody is going to be able to compete with that. So yes, if you have more companies, you have more Bitcoin demand, but the Bitcoin demand from the companies comes with owing debt and equity to people. And so their patients will be tested and they will withdraw when they don't see the results. And that can create bankruptcies and all of that.
17:49Nik Bhatia:But if you look at the number of coins that has come to market, let's just say with these recent 2011 coins that have started to move on chain, come into the custody of Galaxy, which we know is a big shop. Maybe the coins are moving for taking dollars out against collateral. Maybe it's to sell. Doesn't really matter. 80 ,000 coins, how does it knock the market? It just doesn't. So you have strategy at 600 ,000 coins, but the rest of these companies buying a few hundred coins, or I don't even mean to dismiss a 4 ,000 coin purchase, but that's what MicroStrategy does when it's sleeping. It'll buy another 4 ,000 coins.
18:37Nik Bhatia:So if you have a few companies go under 4 ,000, 8 ,000, 20 ,000 that are spot liquidated, I don't know that it hits the market in a material way. Now, to all the people investing in the equity and debt instruments of these individual companies, I can't give all those people a pat on the back and say, best of luck to you. it's more you know uh you know may god be with you in your endeavors but you know that it's not my game as you know as a macro analyst you can't necessarily be an equity analyst and so i'm not going through the capital structure of these companies and saying which ones are good which ones are not management will matter and what i can tell you danny is that reading the sophistication of MSTR's capital structure, the different vehicles, and how they are layering their approach to liability management, because that's the name of the game, I can promise you that the level of sophistication is going to be in the, I'm just making up a number, 10x to 20x the skill set level that some of these other companies will employ.
20:04Nik Bhatia:And that's not me
20:08Nik Bhatia:discrediting the corporate finance officers at these companies. It's just the size that strategy has, the way that they're able to layer it out. It's very impressive to me as more of a corporate finance tourist myself, and I'd proudly call myself that, a corporate finance tourist. I teach corporate finance in its minutiae as it applies to fixed income, U.S. treasuries, thinking about economics, but I'm not a corporate balance sheet analyst by trade. and so but i can recognize those that are really good at it and i can also understand that those that are not really good at it can maybe fake it till they make it but that won't make you know every one of those last forever yeah that makes sense um just quickly back to the cycle thing um i've spoken to like a ton of macro people on the show over the last few months And one of the things that a lot of people tie the sort of traditional Bitcoin cycle to is not necessarily the halving cycle, although that definitely plays into it, but more a global liquidity cycle.
21:24First of all, do you think that's the case? And then secondly, do you think that could mean that we don't actually exit this kind of four year cycle that we're in and instead like rather than staying in a super cycle or extended cycle, whatever you want to call it? So as you know, Danny, I'm a liquidity,
21:40Nik Bhatia:I've built a lot of the analysis that we're building at the Bitcoin layer around liquidity. We have our own index. Liquidity maxi. I certainly am. But I'm not a liquidity cycle maxi. Okay. And so I don't know that just because we had an inflation wave that was mostly supply-side driven, as we saw inflation go from 2 % to 9 % back to 2%, that was a pandemic-induced, a one-off. not it's it's one-off structurally increased inflation from the one to two percent to now the two to four percent i genuinely believe we're in this uh structural structurally higher inflation but that doesn't mean that because there was restrictive in 2021 and 2022 as rates were skyrocketing, that then we get easy in 24, 25, that then it's followed by restrictive in 26, 27.
22:54I don't necessarily follow that approach.
23:00Nik Bhatia:I'm looking at liquidity in the way that we analyze it, which is the size of the banking system, treasury volatility, and I'm analyzing it as a in in the spot market like where are we where have we gone rate of change matters a lot but I'm not thinking it in term three four five six year cycles and how that liquidity cycles through the system I now you know my mentor Michael Howell has this five-year number that every five years because of the quantity of debt and the size of the economy, that every five years there's a rollover risk for the debt of the system. I don't disagree with that either.
23:53Nik Bhatia:But again, I'm more like, let's look at treasury volatility today. Let's look at the rate of change over the last 30, 60, 90 days. How is it going? Well, I'll tell you, it has collapsed. Volatility has collapsed in treasury land. The move index has collapsed. I ran the numbers last night, 12 or 14 red weeks on the move index. What have stocks done? They've gone straight up. And so that is the framework working in real time. for me to, I'm not like other analysts in that I can always think in this two to three to five year in advance and where the cycles are. I have to more live in the now. I was also running the numbers on treasury, 10-year treasury rates.
24:50Nik Bhatia:They're at four and a third today, approximately. Well, guess when we were at four and a third? two months ago, four months ago, 10 months ago, 18 months ago. I mean, when we tagged in October of 2022, we tagged four and a third on the way up, but then you've been flat. So the rate of change was punitive in 2021 and 2022, but then it stopped being punitive. So that four and a third looked like a disaster in October of 22, but today it's not a disaster. In fact, it's actually a supportive it's not even normal it's supportive because stocks are at the all-time high and that's crazy that's the that's how we have to think about it is uh so where is liquidity liquidity is exploding higher as we speak despite four and a third on tens because if you think about four and a third on tens three years ago you're thinking about it wrong it's four and a today and collapsing volatility as opposed to four and a third three years ago and spiking volatility.
25:57Nik Bhatia:While stocks are at the all-time high today, it means that four and a third is a good liquidity condition. It's providing liquidity. And that's how I have to live in my analysis is I have to look at where we are, rate of change, how it's affecting multiple asset classes.
26:22Nik Bhatia:I think for sure that Bitcoin's 2022 bear market is driven by a spiking of broad macro volatility due to the inflation wave due to interest rates. And we talked about it. It's not that the Fed is hiking. The market sells the bonds before the Fed hikes. So it's the market punishing and liquidity being sucked out of the system, volatility spiking, markets stopping to be made, people pull back from their Bitcoin position, and then the reversal happens in the subsequent years. So that's how I'm thinking about it. So I definitely want to get deeper into the macro stuff and what that means for Bitcoin.
27:06But before we move on from kind of the cycle stuff, Do you have a sort of target in mind for this year, next 12 months, whatever it is? And no one's going to hold you to this, Nick. But I did see you tweet recently that Bitcoin is going to a million, but it's not going to be straightforward. I mean, we know Bitcoin is going to a million. It's when, not if. Right.
27:25Nik Bhatia:And I think that that's part of what's making this new era of Bitcoin fun is the increasing certainty that it gets to a million in the 2030 to 2032 area. Yeah, that's, I mean, that's something itself that I've never been able to put a year on Bitcoin hitting a million until this year. So this is the first year I've been like, okay, by 2032, you might expect Bitcoin to be at a million dollars. That's seven years from now. You know, the next order of magnitude, we hit 10 ,000 in 2017. 17, so seven, eight years from 10 to 100, another seven to a million, and you can really put it there and be like, yeah, the next order of magnitude is seven years away.
28:16Nik Bhatia:That's amazing. And I love that. It also means that the obsession over a million on this current cycle, it's not that's not where the action is or the analysis is to me it means that at this portion of the cycle we should be thinking about 200 250 and so that i am i am starting to think that
28:43Nik Bhatia:to 200 to 300 is what my expectation expectation has been for the last few years but it's starting to lock in i think i was doing some back of the envelope that you know 225 somewhere around there in the next 12 to 18 months seems very, very realistic to me. The numbers that I was using there, 70 ,000 unrealized and 3x on the MVRV puts us at 210. And I really like thinking about 210. It's a nice multiple of 21 as well. And so we'll put it there at 210 Danny. I don't want to put a time on it, but I'm not talking about five years here. I'm, I'm really, I really am talking about one to two years now looking at like the next, when we remember when you guys were in my corner, uh, and we did that in person, we were talking about, we were talking about 300 and what would it take to get to 300 K and that was i felt like it was much more speculative at the time but it's i don't feel like it's speculative now now it's within you know our current market reach it is wild though that the idea of throwing out a million dollar bitcoin isn't that crazy anymore i remember saying to people that bitcoin's gonna go to a million dollars in like 2017 and people looked like you like you were fucking nuts and if i say that to people now even if they're not very into bitcoin people are like, okay, I can see that.
30:25And that mind shift is crazy. It's wild to see. And it's bullish.
30:32Nik Bhatia:It is. You have to lean into it too, because you have to normalize it. And it's my responsibility to normalize it to the readers because I'll single out a reader that I have and God bless him. But he pinged me around the week of liberation day and he said, I sold it all. He's an older gentleman, not an American, had set himself up very well, but he's out. And he was a longtime reader, and it wasn't enough. What we were doing wasn't enough to keep him from doing that. Not that it's our responsibility to prevent him from selling or to hold it all the way to the end. but okay then yes we do need to do a better job or change the language alter it to make it more as something that people expect yeah that's one of the reasons i do as well it's more to kind of shock people into taking it seriously like i want people who i care about to own bitcoin and i feel like that's a really easy way to make them take this thing seriously if they think it's going from 100k to a million dollars in a relatively short amount of time.
31:41But let's get on to the macro stuff. I think to kind of set everything up that I want to talk to you about, we should probably talk about Jerome Powell and Trump, because Trump seems to be doing everything he possibly can to push Powell out of that seat. But let's start with Powell. Do you think, if you take into account everything that he's gone through sort of after the pandemic and high inflation, do you think he's done a good job as Fed Chair.
Read the full transcript
32:08Nik Bhatia:The reason I like Powell, Danny, has less to do with his policy. And we can, we'll talk about his policy too. But the reason I like Powell is coming off of Yellen and Bernanke. And I was on the desk for both. So I got to experience, you know, So this is my third Fed chair, let's just say, in my career. I like Powell because he doesn't insult my intelligence when he talks. Doesn't mean he doesn't have a political slant. Sometimes you can hear his political slant. But he doesn't talk down to the financial participant and try to tell them the condition. he's more descriptive and he's a financial market practitioner so he does understand things like volatility bid ask spreads and options pricing he he he's not that economist guy that Bernanke and Yellen were and are.
33:15Nik Bhatia:The hardcore academic economist. He's a private equity guy. He's a private sector background guy. He is a long-fed career, so I don't want to just put him as, you know, as like a besant, for example, which, you know, spent four decades in the private sector, a Druck guy, a Soros guy, and then he comes into the Treasury Department. So I've always liked Powell more than the previous two, because when he does the presser, I don't feel offended. I mean, it might sound silly, but whenever Yellen or Bernanke spoke, I felt personally insulted that you think this, you're taking my time if I'm going to listen to you.
34:12Nik Bhatia:I don't want to hear propaganda. I want to hear more ascription of the situation. So that's how I feel about Powell generally. The policy, yeah, he was late in 2021 by a mile. The 2022... QE, 2021 and 2022 QE will, I think, forever be inexplicable from a pure Fed independent standpoint. Right. But. If you and I know that you've done lots of work on this, Danny, the arrangement between the Treasury and the Fed Department during the 40s up until the 1951 Treasury Fed Accord, when they unpegged rates from where the government was setting them.
35:10Nik Bhatia:the 40s were a war period and this was a non-war period war-like spending program and the government needed to do that to prevent collapsing GDP so instead of blaming Powell maybe we assume that he didn't really have much choice on the 2022 decisions to do extended QE. Maybe he didn't have any choice. Maybe he was tapped on the shoulder to do that because of the CARES Act and the$3 trillion that had to be rolled out to the market in the excess treasury supply that needed to be absorbed to not shock the market. So we're on the topic of Fed independence. That's where this conversation is going, let's think about whether even that was independent, pal, or whether it wasn't.
36:09Nik Bhatia:I don't think there's much of an argument to say that he was independent when they were doing that secondary QE infinity. That doesn't, I mean, it was terrible monetary policy, but what if you didn't do it and that spending package still had the green light? What would that have done to the treasury market?
36:42Nik Bhatia:So what about Powell's policy? Another thing is the SOFR wave. he was one of the architects i believe that acronym was a a rc i was studying it when i was on the desk the alternative rates committee that's what the arc i can't can't remember exactly what the alternative rates committee it was like the libor cert the search for the replacement of libor this was going on during 2017 powell was one of the architects of this then he came and he pounded the table on SOFR and it went, it all went over my head at the time. I did not understand this. I was barely getting into LIBOR. Like my first real LIBOR mentor was 2018 as SOFR was popping up.
37:31Nik Bhatia:I'm like, what is LIBOR? Why is it so important? I was actually asking, why are all these bonds that I'm trading issued out of London and trading off of LIBOR? I don't understand it. It was the offshore dollar system, but I didn't understand what I was trading at the time. So I definitely didn't understand the foresight of trying to bring a repo rate into the US dollar capital market to anchor activity going forward. I understood repo. I understood why it was a great rate. I traded repo. So I understood why this is a brilliant rate to use. I still didn't put the pieces together. So Howell's ability to help the nation, or I shouldn't even say help the nation.
38:22Nik Bhatia:Maybe he is patriotic in that way, or maybe his directive was to protect the United States of America as a nation. But from a capital markets perspective, he was trying to reduce the influence of non-US banks. Where is that in any of the conversation? See, it's not really present. So how do I feel about Powell versus Trump? Well, I don't actually know that it has anything to do with Fed independence at this point versus 2022 versus 2024. This episode is brought to you by the massive legends IREN, the largest Nasdaq listed Bitcoin miner using 100 % renewable energy. IREN are not just powering the Bitcoin network, they're also providing cutting edge computing resources for AI all backed by renewable energy.
39:18We've been working with their founders Dan and Will for quite some time now and have been really impressed with their values, especially their commitment to local communities and sustainable computing power. So whether you're interested in mining Bitcoin or harnessing AI compute power, IREN is setting the standard. Visit iren.com to learn more, which is I-R-E-N dot com. What if you could lower your tax bill and stack Bitcoin at the same time? Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can. New tax guidelines from the Big Beautiful Bill allow American miners to write off 100 % of the cost of their mining hardware in a single tax year.
39:49That's right, 100 % write-off. If you have 100k in capital gains or income, you can purchase 100k of miners and offset it entirely. Blockware's mining as a service enables you to start mining Bitcoin right now without lifting a finger. Blockware handles everything from securing the miners to sourcing low-cost power to configuring the mining pool, they do it all. You get to stack Bitcoin at a discount every single day while also saving big come tax season. Get started today by going to mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD and for every hosted miner purchased you get one week of free hosting and electricity.
40:24Of course none of this is tax advice speak with blockware to learn more at mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash wbd. One of the things that keeps me up at night is the idea of a critical error with my bitcoin cold storage. This is where Anchor Watch comes in. With Anchor Watch your bitcoin is insured with your own A plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy and all bitcoin is held in their time-locked multi-sig vaults. So you have the peace of mind knowing your bitcoin is fully insured while not giving up custody. So whether you're worried about inheritance planning, wrench attacks, natural disasters or just your own mistakes, you're fully protected by Anchor Watch.
40:57Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55 % and are available for individual and commercial customers located in the US. Speak to Anchor Watch today for a quote and for more details about your security options and coverage. Visit anchorwatch.com today. That is anchorwatch.com. That's interesting to hear because like I've always thought it was a bit of a charade that the Fed is independent. Like clearly it's not fully independent. But if Trump does manage to get Powell out and bring in someone who's basically going to work on behalf of the Treasury, that line gets blurred way further.
41:31Do you see that as being a problem then or not really? It sounds like you're saying that may not even be a big issue.
41:38Nik Bhatia:It becomes a little bit political in that it's going to be more overt as opposed to the 2022 when it's less overt, that it's just the Fed responding to conditions, independent monetary policy. Oh, and it so happens that Congress and the president are passing$2 trillion deficits also. So is it a problem? Perhaps. Besant is on the tape today, again, saying that the independence of the Fed is so crucial to the health of the U.S. economy. So they're saying all the right words in terms of the independence. He's saying, but they also are doing all these other things. There's mission creep. So we have to open up the whole thing to investigation.
42:32Nik Bhatia:I think that it would be material if they overtly strip away some of the independence, but material to what? Material to the current politics. But if you go back to the 40s, it's not even remotely different than something that's happened only eight decades ago in a period that, hey, we are also in a new period to what happened in 1944. Bretton Woods Agreement, there was a new monetary system that was arranged in 1944. It didn't even really kick off until 1958 because of capital controls in Europe. That's something that was in my book, and I know it's something that, you know, you've talked about on your show as well, That the Bretton Woods Agreement and the system didn't even really get going until 58, and it basically died in 68.
43:42Nik Bhatia:So what are we living through? So if 44 was a time that the U.S. had to redo the monetary system and protect itself, and it had a Treasury Fed accord for many years during that time, how is this that different? And if it's the same, is that bad or is that in the national interest? And if it is in the national interest, should we criticize a faltering of independence when you have – it's not even a speculation whether it went non-independent during the 40s until 51. that's what it was, it was not independent the treasury was pegging rates of the bills and the Fed would buy them at and actually what you learn when you learn about the history is that the Fed didn't really even have to move the market the Fed didn't really have to participate it just kind of guides by its policy and then the market adheres to it So it's quite natural, I think, for it to go back this way.
44:59Nik Bhatia:Doesn't mean you won't get critics of the faltering of independence. But again, that's probably another 10 questions. Because obviously, like the start of this fallout between Trump and Powell is really that Trump wants to cut rates and Powell's been really reluctant to do so. Do you think there's an argument that Powell should be cutting rates? Yes. Why is that argument? The argument that Powell should be cutting rates is that the curve isn't necessarily steep enough. It's at about 50 basis points. I'm talking about twos, tens. It could be at 100, and that, I would argue, would be even healthier for the economy.
45:44Nik Bhatia:A steeper yield curve is good for banks. They borrow short and they lend long and they capture the curve. And with more steepness in the yield curve, they have more protection for their profitability. And the two-year yield has been guided a little bit lower than where the Fed Fund's rate is today, which means the market has room for them to cut. I don't know that rates need to be at 2 % because, again, it goes back to what we said about 4 and a third. And I realize that's 10s and we're talking about 2s, different parts of the yield curve. With 10s at 4 and a third and the stock market raging on, do we need lower rates?
46:37Nik Bhatia:no i would argue no we don't really need lower rates because stocks are doing great with feds with tens at four and a third so why do you need twos to go from four and a third to three and a half not necessarily can i ask you a question on that just so i can understand a little bit more yeah are rates at that while stock markets at basically all-time highs because the market is factoring in inflation is the market saying they think inflation is coming back No, and I think that we talked about this last time, when you decompose the yield of tens into the tips yield, which is the real yield, that's a market yield that you get plus inflation, you get this coupon plus inflation.
47:20Nik Bhatia:you strip out the real yield then what you're left over is the break even the inflation break even the assumption of cpi going forward it's frozen at two it just doesn't really move from two to two and a quarter and hasn't for the last three years so there are not there are the the expectation for inflation going forward is somewhere in the two to two and a half percent It's not very high. And the real yield is also around 2 % to 2.25%, which means that if you own treasuries, you have an option. I can either get 4 % from the notes or I can get 2 % from the tips. I expect them to come out even because I could either get 4 % or 2 plus 2%.
48:12Nik Bhatia:It's going to be the same. If it wasn't, if you had, let's say they expected 5 % inflation, you know, in three years from now, you would be buying tips at two because you get two plus five. I'm going to get 7 % next year or in two years. That's a buy all day, all day. But it's not. I mean, tips would be trading at 0 % or negative, which they had. You know, tips had traded at a negative yield for quite often over the last few years. I should say going back 10 years, it's traded negative. It just means that the inflation expectation going forward is not much more than two. If it was, you wouldn't be able to buy tips at two because it's free money.
49:06Nik Bhatia:That makes sense. It's free money, right? It's a breakeven. So if we get into like the more speculative side of this, then let's say Jerome Powell does get ousted. Trump brings someone in. I imagine the easy assumption there is the first thing they do is start cutting rates. Does that then lead to a higher chance of inflation going forwards? Of course. Well, when you when you pump the economy, you. When you lower rates, we'll just go first, second order, third order, right? When you lower rates, you spur borrowing. When you spur borrowing, you create new money, right? That's credit creation. When you create new money, you increase aggregate demand because they're just new borrowers.
49:47Nik Bhatia:There's just more money. When you increase aggregate demand, inflation goes up. So it's one, two, three, four, and it happens. Boom, boom, boom, boom. That's it. So yes. And do you think the, I guess the question is, what else do you think the next Fed's chair will likely do? Do you think things like QE will come back? I don't think you need, and I think they're trying to go away from that. I think they're trying to go away from the swelling of the Fed's balance sheet being such an influential part. I think back to the dual public good that this administration is trying to address they have come out and said we are providing the world a dual public good of treasuries as a reserve asset and global security we are going to reduce the public nature of that good meaning you have to pay for it now so So the defense is easy because you just have to purchase more weapons.
51:01Nik Bhatia:If you purchase the weapons, then we will protect you. So that's easy. But how do you get them to reduce their reliance on treasuries as the reserve asset? You actually have to buy less from them on net. And so you send less dollars out. So if you send less dollars out, they have less money to buy treasuries. well, then you better not issue so many treasuries. You better reduce the amount of treasuries that you're issuing. And so the shift into Bitcoin policies and supporting the idea of Bitcoin, even talking about gold, you know, the whole Fort Knox thing, something that's so funny because I saw an absolutely epic meme of Trump.
51:51Nik Bhatia:It's the mom in the pool holding up a smiling baby. The smiling baby is Coca-Cola with real sugar. The other baby is drowning, and it's the Epstein files. And then at the bottom of the pool, the skeleton is the Fort Knox audit. Yeah, we didn't get that live stream audit that they promised. We certainly did it. But I say all this to say that increasing the legitimacy and popularity of gold and Bitcoin as neutral reserve assets reduces the necessity of foreign governments to stockpile treasuries as the reserve asset. Because, oh, the U.S. is doing it too, you know, stockpiling these other reserve assets.
52:34Nik Bhatia:This is going to be good for us. So your question was about QE. I say all of this to say the U.S. government, from a policy perspective, actually wants less treasuries debt relative to the GDP. They want that number to go down. And if it goes down, you are less so reliant on the central bank to stockpile treasuries and all of that kind of stuff. Do I think that they're trying to get their own Fed share so that they can do their own version of the CARES Act or this, you know, big, beautiful bill cubed where they borrow and spend$10 trillion on energy grids and energy infrastructure and new nuclear power plants.
53:27Nik Bhatia:I don't really think so, Danny, that that's part of what they're trying to do is like a blank check for 100 new nuclear power plants and rewiring the electricity grid around the country and, you know, rebuilding bridges and ports and all of that kind of stuff. I don't think so. I actually really don't believe that that's what they're trying to do. They want the private sector to do it. They want US banks to lend. It's actually the same thing as the CBDC versus stablecoin thing. It's all about public versus private. They want digital dollars. They just don't want to issue. They don't want the central bank to issue.
54:13Nik Bhatia:They don't want to issue them. They just want the banks to do it. So they want the private sector to do all this growth, build out. They want the banks to lend, and they just want to be supportive. Low regulation, low taxes i i know it's a very long answer but i don't believe that it's a qe for the blank check for 100 nuclear power plants funded by the u.s treasury okay interesting um so on the bitcoin stuff i got you to speculate a little bit if you had to speculate here do you think again let's say in the next 12 months probably sooner power loses his job and rates get cut Politically, I do believe that's where we're going.
54:57Nik Bhatia:I don't know how healthy it would be to slash rates, let's just say. Right? Stock's at an all-time high. Inflation isn't reined in. It'd be good for Bitcoin.
55:13Nik Bhatia:I want to see Bitcoin weather all the storms, not just get a free ride. which is why I don't really believe that, again, four and a third stocks at all time high. You don't need stimulation. It's actually stimulative. It's unbelievable to see the economy and the stock market both do what they have with tens at four and a third for three years. It's incredible. You actually, one must marvel at it. Think about, Danny, all the, and I'm going to pick on maybe some of the people you interview. Think about all the hysteria about treasury auctions. Oh, my God. Treasury auctions are failing. Every three months, like, one 20-year goes bad.
56:05Nik Bhatia:And everyone's like, treasury auctions, are you kidding me? Three years with rates absolutely flat, the last five, 10-year auctions have gone, stopped through, meaning more demand in the moment than where the going in price was. It's called when issued, the when issued market. Five straight months that tens have beat the when issued market. This is a, I wouldn't say you're in a raging bull market, but this is a very stable market. Not only is it stable, but volatility is collapsing, which rewards all the risk holders. Treasury market stability has been the name of the game for three straight years.
56:55Nik Bhatia:so what does the fed what does trump or besant need to get the fed to do for them other than one thing annual interest expense right which feeds directly back into how much they can cut taxes and all that kind of stuff that's this fiscal dominance idea annual interest expense the actual dollars that they spend, they're like, hey, please cut the rate so that our actual interest dollars that we spend can go down so that we can cut taxes and not get scored by the CBO in this negative way that makes all the headlines say you're increasing the deficit. They're not actually increasing the deficit. They're reducing taxes, hoping that the deficit doesn't continue to spiral.
57:49Nik Bhatia:But yes, that's the way that it gets spun and that the CBO scores it is that when you reduce taxes, well, if the interest rate doesn't come down, you're going to have a deficit and it is going to grow. That's just math. So it is about math. They want it lower because of this first order effect reason not to do all this. And I want to mention one more thing. I was in Washington in January, and I got to go to the Capitol and chat. It was obvious to me that this false narrative of poor treasury auctions was an underlying scare tactic for the government to get the votes, to get stable coins so that you can have an additional buyer of treasuries.
58:45Nik Bhatia:It was a psyop. It's everyone was talking about it. It was obvious to me. It doesn't, I actually think it's good, right? The stable coins being another source of treasury demand. It's good. It's not going to save the treasury market. It wasn't necessary to save the treasury market, but they got it. It's another buyer. The Treasury market didn't need saving. It is, again, it's stable. It doesn't mean that they can ignore it. Like, they're doing everything they can to structurally reduce the amount of net imports, right? I mean, everything from tariffs to the tomato ban now on Mexico, every little marginal thing that they can to prevent the export of dollars, the stockpiling of treasuries abroad, they can.
59:44Nik Bhatia:They're trying to do. And maybe it is contributing and maybe it's not. But the U.S. Treasury right now is in a decent place. And look at the June numbers. I literally fell out of my chair when I saw that they had a surplus in June. I mean, is that a weak treasury market or a good treasury market where you're actually turning a surplus? Even if it's one month, it's a little surprising to the upside. To try and take this back to the start of the conversation when we were talking about Bitcoin cycles, Is there a bit of a strange irony here where someone coming in to replace Powell, cutting rates, might lead to Bitcoin pumping and be one of the things that mean we stay in the four-year type cycle if we have more of a blow-off top type event and things do have to pull back down?
1:00:37Nik Bhatia:I can't really see that happening. I don't think that a new Fed chair pumps Bitcoin. There's the quote. I don't think that one person, even Donald Trump, can have that type of effect. Remember that the current wave of pro-Bitcoin policy is driven by the electorate. Trump is responding to the electorate. It's not a Trump. Trump is not the one that's like, let's use Bitcoin to save the nation. He tells us that it's him pumping Bitcoin. Yeah. He loves himself. Yes, that's clear. Well, Nick, you're the best. I've really enjoyed talking to you. Always do. Where do you want to send anyone to find out more about Bitcoin Layer, the Bitcoin Age, all the work you do?
1:01:31Nik Bhatia:Thebitcoinlayer.com is where people can find all of the work. So it links to the channel. It links to our research offering and my two books, Layered Money and Bitcoin Age. So thebitcoinlayer.com, you guys can find everything that we're doing over there. Amazing. Thank you so much for this, Nick. It was good. And we'll definitely catch up in October as well when I'm in LA. Danny, all the best. Thank you so much. Appreciate you. Thank you, man.
From the publisher
Nik Bhatia breaks down why Bitcoin may have broken free of its four-year cycle and what that means for the next decade.
We discuss Bitcoin's market maturity, compressed volatility, and how new corporate demand are reshaping price dynamics — and why this could mean an end to drawn out bear markets and blow-off tops.
We get into how macro forces like liquidity, rate policy, and U.S. fiscal dominance intersect with Bitcoin, whether Powell vs. Trump really matters, and why Bitcoin could hit $1 million by 2032.
In this episode:
- Why the four-year halving cycle may be over
- How corporate treasury strategies are changing Bitcoin’s market structure
- The role of liquidity and treasury markets in driving Bitcoin price
- What Powell vs. Trump means for rates, inflation, and Bitcoin
THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS:
Follow:
Danny Knowles: https://x.com/_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny
Nik Bhatia: https://x.com/timevalueofbtc




