Iran, Oil and the Next Financial Crisis | Luke Gromen

10 Mar 2026 · 1 h 7 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Luke Gromen discusses the Iran-Israel conflict’s market and macroeconomic implications, arguing the war may be a strategic draw at best, with major consequences for oil, U.S. military credibility, de-dollarization, and a potential fast-moving financial crisis driven by AI-era credit stress.

Guest

Luke Gromen is a long-time macro/markets investor and analyst known for focusing on geopolitics, financial leverage, and Bitcoin/alternative hedges.

Key claims

  1. Oil fell sharply (rumors of G7 SPR sales denied; refinery shutdowns cited), but escalation risk remains if Iran keeps striking.
  2. U.S. “dog that doesn’t bark” issue: carriers reportedly stayed away from Strait of Hormuz due to missile/drone threats and damaged U.S. radars.
  3. If private credit breaks, banks pull lending, recession forces Treasury/entitlement stress or money printing.
  4. Bitcoin acted “risk-off” during the Middle East worsening, reflecting capital flight (e.g., UAE money moving out).
  5. AI disruption plus leverage could accelerate a 2007/2008-like credit event.

Notable examples

$350,000 jet rides out of the Middle East; Tel Aviv/air-defense claims; Strait of Hormuz closure; private credit mark-to-market losses (e.g., BlackRock fund to zero); mortgage delinquency timeline comparisons to 2008.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Setting the Stage: Geopolitical Tensions

0:00 to 1:06

Explore the immediate geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and their implications.

“Everyone's like lined up for the comfortable lie.”

The Evolving Situation in the Middle East

1:06 to 4:08

Understand the developments regarding oil prices, U.S. military actions, and their repercussions.

“I was just talking to you before we started recording.”

Iran's Resilience and Strategic Responses

4:08 to 7:28

Analyze Iran's military responses and their strategic implications in the ongoing conflict.

“we have a CBS report citing Trump that he's saying basically the war's over.”

The Impact of U.S. Strategies in the Region

7:28 to 11:46

Examine the effectiveness of U.S. military strategies and the potential shift in regional power balances.

“And the reason I say that is they got him to taco again.”

Future Implications and Strategic Draws

11:46 to 14:00

Discuss the future of U.S.-Iran relations and the possible outcomes of the current conflict.

“But that world's most dominant Navy wouldn't dare go into the Strait of Hormuz over the last two weeks.”

Escalation in the Persian Gulf

14:00 to 17:21

Explore the consequences of Iran's military actions in response to Western aggression.

“Because it's very hard to say, you know, would Netanyahu, when faced with Israel getting, you know, Tel Aviv getting turned into Gaza, would he start launching nukes?”

Analyzing Trump's Military Decisions

19:00 to 23:38

Gain insights into the factors influencing Trump's military strategy regarding Iran.

“So what do you think would have actually gone into Trump's decision making more?”

The New Landscape of Warfare

23:38 to 28:00

Understand how advancements in military technology are reshaping global power dynamics.

“enormous, enormous implications, enormous implications.”

The Power Dynamics of Oil and Geopolitics

28:00 to 30:20

Explore the geopolitical implications of oil sanctions involving Iran, Russia, and China.

“He gets on with Larry Kudlow and says, well, we're going to unsanction Russian oil.”

The Power Dynamics of Oil and Geopolitics

31:45 to 32:22

Explore the geopolitical implications of oil sanctions involving Iran, Russia, and China.

“Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55 % and are available for individual and commercial customers located in the US.”
Show all 21 chapters

Market Reactions to Geopolitical Tensions

32:29 to 34:38

Analyze the potential effects of ongoing conflicts on global markets and oil prices.

“And I think oil will go right back over a hundred because at that point people go, oh my gosh, this wasn't, this wasn't a draw.”

Bitcoin’s Unusual Resilience During Conflict

34:39 to 37:57

Understand Bitcoin's behavior in response to geopolitical crises and market conditions.

“And I think some of that is very possible if you're in the UAE and you need to get your money out of UAE as fast as you can, I buy some Bitcoin.”

Bitcoin's Evolution and Market Patterns

37:58 to 42:00

Examine the historical patterns of Bitcoin and its potential future as an asset class.

“Well, then Bitcoin's probably going to hit with that in the short run.”

Market Observations and Bitcoin's Risks

42:00 to 46:11

Analyzing the bond markets and the implications for Bitcoin amidst selling pressures and technical indicators.

“Didn't mean it was over, but also didn't mean it was a great buy at 40.”

Concerns Over AI and Financial Stability

46:11 to 49:19

Discussing the potential impact of AI on employment and the debt market, and its implications for future financial crises.

“I like, I'm no quantum expert, but from people I've spoken to, I think that's mainly a narrative issue rather than anything real right now.”

Historical Parallels: 2007 Financial Crisis

49:19 to 56:03

Exploring the similarities between current economic indicators and those leading to the 2007 financial crisis.

“You're seeing this in credit delinquencies.”

The Impact of Job Loss on the American Psyche

56:03 to 57:53

Explore how job losses lead to deeper societal issues in America.

“See, I've not heard that or have not thought about it that way where you talk about the Rust Belt and China taking those jobs.”

The Dangers of Losing Meaning in Life

57:53 to 1:00:01

Discuss the consequences of losing purpose and meaning in society.

“the day after they shot JFK, and you covered your short in 1980, it's a pretty good time to short America.”

AI's Role in Job Displacement and Economic Change

1:00:01 to 1:01:38

Analyze the potential of AI to displace jobs and its economic implications.

“And forget about the social side of it for a moment, the credit side of it.”

The Societal Effects of Economic Shifts

1:01:38 to 1:04:26

Examine how economic shifts affect social structures and individual lives.

“I mean, remember where we're literally like two weeks ago before the whole Iran thing where it was like.”

Opportunities Amidst AI Disruption

1:04:26 to 1:05:38

Identify the potential opportunities that arise from AI-driven disruption.

“A couple of eighth graders in a garage can now vibe code.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Everyone's like lined up for the comfortable lie. No one wants to get in the line of the inconvenient truth. Would he start launching nukes? What happens next? People were paying 350 ,000 bucks for a jet ride out of the Middle East. You're in the UAE and you need to get your money out of UAE as fast as you can. I buy some Bitcoin. Bitcoin was going up as things were getting worse in the Middle East. Normally, Bitcoin is fully risk-on. And in this case, it was actually acting as risk off. This is going to go really fast. You know, it moves. Connect up a couple computers. Boom. Gone. GTFO. Like, game over.

0:42See you later. People aren't going to pay their mortgages and their car loans and credit card bills. And then those things are going to blow up something in private credit. And private credit's going to have an issue. And then the banks are going to pull back on lending. And any kind of recession will force us into default on the treasuries or entitlements or print the money. And they'll print the money. I don't know how they're going to get there. To me, the only debate is how fast.

1:06Luke Groman, great to see you, mate. How are you? Well, Danny, how are you? I am really good, thank you. I was just talking to you before we started recording. It's 6 a.m. here in Australia, and I was like, what did I miss, Luke? And you said, well, the war's over. So fill us in. What's happened while I've been asleep?

1:29well was you were going to bed you probably saw oil at 119 uh it finished it is now at 84 again it basically went straight downhill after they came in this morning uh there was a rumor of a g well not a rumor a report that g7 was going to get together and sell their oil out of their spr uh to get oil down then they said well we're not actually doing that um We've seen more news of refineries shutting down. I think I saw the Saudis. There was news last night of the U.S. evacuating its embassy in Saudi Arabia. There was news earlier today, potential, I'm not sure if this was confirmed, the U.S. consulate was evacuated in Adana, Turkey.

2:20This afternoon, Israel came out and said there was a report in Washington Post, essentially that israeli officials were beginning to quote-unquote get concerned um uh understandably so uh with tel aviv getting hit last night and the lights getting apparently turned off uh as as the reports that i saw um we had um what was the next thing right oh we had um Um, Senator, uh, um, Senator warmonger from South Carolina. What's his name? Um, I can't think of it. Um, at any rate, this guy has like literally been dreaming about bombing Iran since he was in the crib. And at any rate, um, he came out today and said, uh, oh, the Saudis are not supporting us.

3:10Maybe we should like slow this down a little bit. What's going on here? Um, and, uh, Senator Graham, Lindsey Graham, that's his name, not Senator warmonger. uh translates actually in south carolinian senator lindsey graham translates to warmonger anyway i'm being more overtly political than i usually am i should stop it um it's only because i think it strategically was a very big mistake at any rate uh shortly thereafter the iranians came out and said every missile we fire from now on is going to be more than one ton warhead uh which you know i tweeted at the times a big uh geopolitical poker call right poke, call and raise, which is we've been saying we have plenty of air defense missiles left.

3:51The Israelis have been saying same and have been we've both been saying the Iranians are going to run out soon. And the Iranians are like, we can keep doing this for a while and we're fine. And we are about to find out. And literally probably about 20 minutes after that headline hit and about an hour or so after the Israeli Washington Post headlines hit, we have a CBS report citing Trump that he's saying basically the war's over. That, you know, we've destroyed their navy and we've done, we've largely disrupted their, we've largely, or no, we've destroyed their ability to shoot missiles. Now, literally 20 minutes after he said that, Iran began getting hit, or began, Israel began reporting getting hit by more missiles overnight.

4:38Yeah, it's getting to be nighttime there now, or it is nighttime there now so markets are rallying oil is down a bunch um it's been like a giant seesaw up and down across most markets today and i feel like that's a day in my life i'll never get back who's been the winner out of this situation because um i think trump expected to go in this to be over very quickly and maybe didn't expect the pushback from iran that they got and like Iran have been on the offensive in a way that I don't know if anyone imagined. I think we have done a lot of damage to Iran. I think Israel's done a lot of damage to Iran.

5:24I think Israel was staring down the prospect of Tel Aviv being turned into something that looks like Gaza, which is to say flattened. Yeah. I think, forget about what I think, I know Iran was much more effective than our planners thought. Why they thought that, I don't know. We're supposed to have superior intelligence. I think our war planners were telling our civilian leadership exactly that. There were hints of that two weeks ago when Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Cain, General Cain, came out and was quoted in at least four of the most important media around Washington and New York City in the Beltway saying we don't have the weapons to do this, essentially, effectively distancing himself from this, putting it all on Trump.

6:23And in the ensuing two weeks, it hasn't gone nearly as well as advertised, which I, again, I know for a fact I'm not guessing at that based on what I'm hearing. and so it definitely destroyed a lot of stuff on the ground for Iran Israel got bloodied up the you the Iran Navy not that that was ever really a threat was definitely a big W for us and an L for them

6:59now what did Iran and the way if this really is the end of the war I would probably gun to my head at best chalk it up to a strategic draw and possibly, you know, you know, you're you're a former fighter, right? I would probably give it I would probably from a strategic standpoint, it probably would be, you know, I don't know, one, one, one, one with I mean, yeah, literal, literal draw. Right. I'm not a big boxing or fighting guy. And the reason I say that is they got him to taco again. They got him to taco again. Oil goes to 100, and he panics, as he has to panic, because he doesn't have, you know, a year ago with Liberation Day, we said that the bond market were his broken ribs, were the U.S.'s broken ribs.

7:49And a fighter who knows the other fighter's ribs are broken is going to beat on those ribs until they're on the canvas. And the U.S. can't abide$100 oil. They can't. The bond market can't and stock market can't. And we just saw that. And so that was a big tell. But I think even bigger than that, because I don't think that's necessarily a shock to anybody, is A, I hear very credible rumblings that the United States strategic radars and New York Times wrote about this, not quite in this depth, but that our strategic radars were heavily damaged or destroyed around Gulf. And there's a lot of people that as of a couple hours ago were saying, we need to keep doing this.

8:34We're doing this to really put the squeeze on China. Those same writers were not talking about, you know, how do we rebuild strategic radars without Chinese rare earths? and if the Chinese might be slightly reticent to sell those rare earths to rebuild our strategic radars and I think bigger picture if there's been a lot of people sort of bragging about how we're running a protection racket essentially which we kind of are right you know some of the you know hashtag America crowd you know hey we've got the world's best military and we run a protection racket and there's nothing they can do about it.

9:12Yes. And when you run a protection racket and then you don't protect, that risk starts raising very uncomfortable questions amongst the protectees. And what they start to say is, you know what? We're going to invest in our own protection. Well, we needed those dollars flowing into our treasuries, markets, AI, etc. And so that's kind of a TBD to be determined outcome to it. So, you know, it's kind of like we definitely got a victory from the standpoint of, look, there's a bunch of stuff burning and the leaders are dead. And, you know, it's, you know, I saw one meme set, you know, look, it's a victory.

10:00It took us 21 years to remove the Taliban and replace, you know, take Afghanistan from the Taliban and then give it back to the Taliban. It only took us eight days to take Iran from Khomeini and give it back to Khomeini. So that was a lot faster. Couldn't help but laugh at that.

10:22like I said I netted out if this really is the end of the war it's at best to draw

10:32because if I'm Iran, Iran is going to now work as fast as possible to get nukes number one and China knowing that we are going to try to use Iran to cut them off their oil is going to help them get those nukes as fast as they can as will the Russians, because the Russians, it's a bit of an underbelly for the Russians.

10:56And we learned that what Eric Prince, former head of Blackwater, said last February was true, which is there's been a revolution in the military affairs. And missiles and drones have made obsolete a lot of existing equipment. And there is a lot that has occurred in the last two weeks to support that view, not least of which is the closing of the Gulf, right? We have the most dominant Navy in the world. And they closed the Strait of Hormuz with missiles. And our Navy wouldn't get anywhere near it. And that's sort of the, you know, that line of inconvenient truths and comfortable lies. And everyone's like lined up for the comfortable lie.

11:44No one wants to get in the line of the inconvenient truth, which is we do have the world's most dominant Navy. There's no question about that. But that world's most dominant Navy wouldn't dare go into the Strait of Hormuz over the last two weeks. Why? and I've heard some very credible rumblings on the ground as to why that is and um that's why I would say at best case it's a draw so uh you know let's let's see what happens it's Trump you know this could change you know tomorrow this could change tonight who knows um but at any rate it's been uh it's been a heck of a day it's been a heck of a week boxing terms it really has in boxing terms this seems like it's not a victory it's like someone's got cut and they've stopped the fight um but the thing that i can't quite figure out is what this means like there's there's so many questions in this one is that like they wanted regime change in iran they kind of got that but have they gonna have just brought someone in who's gonna hate america even more he's seen his family liquid liquidated by missiles like what does that do to his psyche like is this actually over and if it is even for now who's got the upper hand in negotiations because if i was the the man in charge of iran i would be like we need to ramp up now let's actually get nukes yeah i mean i i've heard conflicting things on the the new guy right so like his regime change ostensibly but it's it's um you know father to son i've heard the son is harder line I've heard maybe he's not as bright as the father.

13:26I don't know. That's one person whose views I respect asserted that. I don't know their grounds for saying that or basis for saying that. I hear I have another person I respect who says he's you know this new leader is respected by the IRGC right the Republican Guard or whatever they are and that he was in naval intelligence or military intelligence which suggests he's not that dumb.

13:58um and look i i just think there's i look at it simplistically which is i try to put myself in every other person's shoes i ever interact with to understand their motivations and if someone killed my father my wife and my children with with a drone and then i knew like like there was overnight there was a um overnight my time a iranian general on their state media saying like trump and netanyahu have have are now stuck in a persian gulf slaughterhouse because they're running out air defense missiles and we know it and in the next three four days we're gonna pound on them and so if it's me I pound on him and I don't I think I don't I would like to think I'm a better person than that um but I'm I probably not it's probably I'd have to do some work around that right that's you know our good lord himself it was probably the only person on earth that isn't gonna be saying oh wait he has not a lot of defenses left button button button button um and tonight you know we'll see i'll get all i was i was getting on i was seeing some reports i've not seen anything um of more strikes tonight from iran into israel so let's see um but the broader point is is the other guy gets a say right this is like in a boxing match you don't get in the middle of boxing match just go you know okay i'm done for now oh i broke my hand we're good right no you got to keep fighting for you know um or you gotta or you gotta take a knee you gotta go down so

15:49i i think it's gonna be very interesting to see the next couple days um because if the other side if iran doesn't back down and especially if they really do start hitting Israel more aggressively, then what? Because it's very hard to say, you know, would Netanyahu, when faced with Israel getting, you know, Tel Aviv getting turned into Gaza, would he start launching nukes? Betting that, I bet he would. Then what? Do Russia and China get involved then? What happens next? Like, so let's see, but I'm, you know, it is very much, you know, in a state of flux.

16:58or monthly repayments, just easy access to dollars without selling a single sat. Ledin exclusively offer Bitcoin-backed loans with all collateral held by Ledin directly or their funding partners. Your Bitcoins never lent out to generate interest. I recently took out a loan with Ledin. The whole process was super easy. The application took me less than 15 minutes, and in a few hours, I had the dollars in my account. It was super smooth. So if you need cash, but you don't want to sell Bitcoin, head over to ledin.io forward forward slash WBD and you'll get 0.25 % off your first loan. That's L-E-D-N dot I-O forward slash WBD.

17:33If you haven't tried out Club Orange yet, then now is the time. It's my go-to place to find Bitcoiners whenever I'm traveling. Club Orange is a social app built for Bitcoiners where you can find meetups and events in your area and find merchants that are accepting Bitcoin. There are over 19 ,000 Bitcoiners on there and whether you're at home or traveling, it's a great place to keep in touch with Bitcoiners from all over the world. I've been using Club Orange since it was Orange Pill app and it really is awesome. So if you're on there, drop me a DM and say hi. And if you want to find out more and download the app, just search for Club Orange on your app store or go to cluborange.org.

18:06Bitcoiners, as you know, with fiat money constantly debasing, wealth preservation isn't optional. That's why I recommend Swan Bitcoin, a team of dedicated Bitcoiners who work with families and businesses to build and secure generational wealth with Bitcoin. Strong relationships with clients are at the center of everything SWAN does. A dedicated SWAN private wealth representative, which is a real person that you can text and call, will help you build a Bitcoin wealth strategy using SWAN's comprehensive platform of Bitcoin services, including tax advantage retirement accounts, advanced Bitcoin cold storage using collaborative self-custody, inheritance planning with both trust and entity accounts, tax loss harvesting, asset-backed loans, and more.

18:45SWAN have helped over 100 ,000 clients since 2020. And if you're serious about acquiring and securing Bitcoin, I recommend SWAN. Meet the team at swan.com forward slash WBD, which is swan.com forward slash WBD. So what do you think would have actually gone into Trump's decision making more? Would it have been the missiles and drones, the actual kinetic side of this war? Or would it have been the economics with oil going to, you know,$110 a barrel? I think that is visibly the thing that is causing him to pull back. I think that is the thing that is not visible to most people is what has happened to our radars on the ground, our ability to protect allies in the Gulf, what that is doing to their willingness to host American bases and troops, etc.

19:34You know, I've said before in this year a couple different times in both reports and in public appearances, it's really important these days to ask about the dog that doesn't bark, or as Charlie Munger says, invert, invert, invert, always invert.

19:53Secretary Rubio was on the idiot box today talking. He literally said, with our most powerful military in the history of the world, we are doing this and we're focusing on... Now, a week ago was regime change. It's not regime change anymore. Now it is getting rid of their ability to shoot missiles and sinking their navy. which is in my opinion de-escalatory anyway but the reason i i would get to go exactly one of these press conferences i'd be like mr secretary if we have the most powerful military in the history of the world why don't we just send the navy into the strait of hormuz and open it up and he'd go uh uh well uh and once you look at it from that angle that i think is the sort of the taco that is you know that's that's the secret sauce on the taco i think the overt you know the shell and the meat and the cheese and the lettuce is yeah oil's at 100 treasury market's gone from 3.95 to it was 420 last night um you know it's back to 410 today um but you have 26 basis points in what was that uh six trading days um you get stock market down you got gas prices up a ton uh you got polls in this country that are very much going against him um and that was sort of the big but i think sort of the underpinning of it is it didn't go like they thought it was the iranians were it was and it's i want to be clear some of this was iran but i think a bigger part of it is what eric prince talked about which is eric prince last year said this is the biggest change in military strategy since stirrups were put on horses 800 years ago like and it allowed genghis khan to run rough shot and what his point was is that missiles and drones have made obsolete trillions of installed equipment of the hegemon.

22:06That's the reason we didn't run the Navy into the Strait of Hormuz. That's the reason why once the missiles started flying, some of our carriers went away from the action, deeper into the Indian Ocean, I'm told.

22:21Because missiles and drones, the Mahan doctrine has been enforced by Navy. I made a tweet about this the other day, and a number of people rightfully called me out that I wasn't specific enough. I said that it was 250 years, really 200 plus, when you add in Britain, of mayhem doctrine has been turned on its head. Naval, you know, it had been, you use your Navy to control naval checkpoints, and you control the world. And missiles and drones, which we just saw, mean that naval checkpoints turn into kill zones for navies. And so you've had 400 years of world geopolitics defined by blue water navy powers, America, and then, and arguably, you know, the Spain, England, Portugal, Spain, England, America, or maybe Spain, Portugal, I forget what the order of those two was a long time ago, but you're 300, 400 years that the people who had the deep blue water navy controlled the world.

23:30And I think bigger picture,

23:35this tells us that world's over. And if that world's over,

23:42enormous, enormous implications, enormous implications. So what are those implications? Especially like if we get into the sort of economic side of things, like how is this, like I think the picture's probably changed just in the last few hours with Trump making the announcement that the war might be coming to an end. But like, how are you, what's your read on that, especially like in the early moments of this? If that's true, if it's true that the war's over, the missile and drone thing is absolutely, and what it means is it's essentially democratizing of war In the same way that the internet was democratizing to a whole lot of stuff, right?

24:26So, you know, in the old days, 20 years ago, 30 years ago, right? A couple of music companies had all the A &R agents and they had all the relationships at the radio stations. And if you were a band, you had to like, you know, play a bunch of shows, get discovered, get signed, go on tour, build an audience, get on the radio, right? All this stuff. And then the internet and iTunes and what have you is just like, now you just got to know how to play. If you play, you can play. You can find an audience and you can become world famous. And you don't need radio stations. You don't need DJs. You don't need A &R guys and those record companies as execs and all of them taking their cut.

25:07Gone. And in the same way, the United States Navy could not open the Strait of Hormuz. And I think people need to keep saying that over and over until the implication of it hits them. The United States Navy is the record company with the A &R guys and the big expensive stuff. and Iran with missiles and drones. I mean, what does Iran spend on their military relative to us? I mean, if they spent one one hundredth of what we spend, it might be maybe it's one 50th. Who knows? I don't know. But it's not a lot. And yet. Best case to draw. OK, then what does that mean for.

26:02Macroeconomics, multipolarity. We want to trade outside the dollar. Well, we're going to send the Navy to come beat your head in. Okay, send it into the Strait of Hormuz.

26:15And the Chinese are reportedly, David P. Goldman reported two years ago that the Chinese can produce 1 ,000 cruise missile motors a day. We reportedly have 6 ,000 Tomahawks roughly, less now, uh 6 000 tomahawks and cruise missiles in inventory in total they can make missiles for that in a week for that many and so it turns into what are we you know if we want to stop de-dollarization if we want to stop multi-polarity how many times have you heard it it's too many for me to count but like you know well ultimately the u.s military backs the dollar right what backs the dollar is we have 13 carrier groups yeah and none of them wanted to go to the strait of hormuz because of iran's drone and missiles which cost way less than those 13 carrier battle groups that is that's every bit the shift in power that eric prince talked about and and it was just manifested in the last two weeks so do you think china are looking at this thinking well we're the superpower now then i i think they are looking at not superpowers broadly in the in the traditional sense of the word but i think china understands it is the manufacturing uh linchpin and i think russia understands and has understood i think they've understood this for 10 years certainly last five years, that the world cannot survive without Russia's oil.

27:49That was one of the most hilarious things going into last weekend, right? Which was Scott Besson on Friday night, his oils at 95 and ripping high or into the weekend. He gets on with Larry Kudlow and says, well, we're going to unsanction Russian oil. despite the fact that the washington post had just reported that the russians were helping the iranians target american assets despite the fact that russia is still supporting ukraine who's who's the power guy in commodities in that case it's russia it's not that says a lot it says a lot. It says all you need to know. And that's the part that these guys, whether they be Biden or whether they be Trump's administration, they just, they don't get.

28:46If Iran, Russia, and China, with a little help from India, all stay inside the tent pissing out, you can take Iran's oil offline

28:58and Russia has all the power. Because now you can't take it. You've got to have Russia running full out. You can take Russia offline and control Iran. But again, if you pick fight with either of them, you're going to blow up the oil market. When you blow up the oil market, you're going to blow up the treasury market. When you blow up the treasury market, you're going to blow up the government's ability to fund itself. And so we just kind of ran through this very, very quickly. And so kind of here we are again. So I don't think they think they're superpowers. I think they know. I think they know what they are.

Read the full transcript

29:34I think they understand the leverage they have. And I just think that I think. Putin and Xi are much more low time preference than Americans are. You know, Americans, they only want to buy assets if they're going up at that moment. And, you know, they want immediate pushback and they want immediate reaction. You know, they want it all to be sort of tidied up with a happy ending. And the guy gets the girl, the kiss from the girl at the end of the the end of the half an hour sitcom. And Russia and China, I think, are just happy to sit back and go. Your entire financial system, which is your economy, will blow up without our factories, without our oil.

30:14And we know that. And so we can wait. If you already self-custody Bitcoin, you know the deal with hardware wallets. Complex setups, clumsy interfaces, and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten. Well, BitKey fixes that. BitKey is a multi-sig hardware wallet built by the team behind Square and Cash App. It packs a cryptographic recovery system and built-in inheritance feature into an intuitive, easy-to-use wallet with no seed phrase to sweat over. It's simple, secure self-custody without the stress. And Time named BitKey one of the best inventions of 2024. Get 20 % off at bitkey.world when you use the code WBD.

30:50That's B-I-T-K-E-Y.world and use the code WBD. Do you want to pay less in taxes and stack more Bitcoin? Of course you do. Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can. Under section 168K of the US tax code, Bitcoin mining servers qualify for 100 % bonus depreciation. This means every dollar you spend on miners can directly offset your income in a single year. and that's true for both business owners and W2 earners. If you have$100 ,000 in ordinary income you can purchase$100 ,000 of miners and potentially offset your tax liability entirely. Blockware's mining as a service does the heavy lifting.

31:28They secure the rigs, they source the low-cost power and they handle all the day-to-day maintenance. You stack Bitcoin every single day while drastically shrinking your tax bill. Get started today at blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD. That's blockwarsolutions.com forward slash WBD The thing that keeps me up at night is the idea of a critical error with my Bitcoin cold storage and this is where Anchor Watch comes in With Anchor Watch, your Bitcoin is insured with your own A-plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy and all Bitcoin is held in their time-locked multi-sig vaults So you have the peace of mind knowing your Bitcoin is insured while not giving up custody So whether you're worried about inheritance planning wrench attacks, natural disasters or just your own silly mistakes, you're protected by Anchor Watch.

32:10Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55 % and are available for individual and commercial customers located in the US. Speak to Anchor Watch for a quote and for more details about your security options and coverage, visit anchorwatch.com today. That's anchorwatch.com. Okay, so if we like move this onto sort of markets a little bit, I read your newsletter last week and you were saying, you know assuming the war continues then markets are going to be down across the board everything's too high basically um with this change what do you think happens now do markets shrug this off or is this going to have a longer term effect i think it really depends on what happens in the next couple days um if iran stops shooting missiles then yeah i think markets are it if i wake up tomorrow morning and like tel aviv's gotten hit again and trump's going you know please stop shooting the missiles we've said nicely um i said the war was over everyone should listen to me i have the best idea about war it's the best war it's the shortest war anyway the if the iranians keep hitting the israelis and if it's especially apparent that they have no intention of letting up and if the straight the straight or booze stays shut despite trump's and i've opened the straight or moose open says of me i said it to open why why are they not opening i don't understand um if the straight of hormuz does not open up in the next couple days then i you know i think you're gonna get a relief or you got a relief rally today i think it'll fall through tomorrow um if iran keeps hitting them and we get towards wednesday thursday friday and it's like hey guys straight over moves is still not flowing and trump has said what his p you know said his piece and it hasn't made a difference and iran is pounding on Israel, then I think you're going to go, I think you'll go and set new lows in stocks.

34:07And I think oil will go right back over a hundred because at that point people go, oh my gosh, this wasn't, this wasn't a draw. This was a strategic loss. This was a Suez moment, 1956 for the United States. And now what? The US has to escalate. Iran's going to escalate. Israel can't really defend itself. It's sort of, you know, in the, in the turtle position on the canvas. what are we doing here and um so let's see uh it's a wishy-washy answer but that's i i don't know yeah you wait and see more for the next 48 hours i think one of the really interesting things in terms of how markets reacted to this war was bitcoin so i know you've been sort of bearish bitcoin for the last few months um but while this happened you would normally expect bitcoin to drop off a cliff um with some like geopolitical tension like this but it was pretty strong in fact i think it's even maybe been up across the actual duration of this war did that surprise you it did a little bit and what i think i was watching and it's this is going to be like schrodinger's schrodinger's bitcoin commentary right especially since the war's over um if you look at the days that bitcoin was really strong some of it was like I noticed a couple things on the days it was very strong over the last two weeks one was it was days that NASDAQ was up really strong and software in particular was up very strong so that's like okay well that's just like dead cat bounce from February and some of that could be okay well you know consumers going to get killed with oil going up so software doesn't use any oil quick oh software's oversold maybe uh the other thing i noticed was it was also up on some days where there where things were getting worse in the middle east but were not necessarily reflected in the stock prices at that moment when i say getting worse based on what i was reading based on what I was hearing.

36:18And I think some of that is very possible if you're in the UAE and you need to get your money out of UAE as fast as you can, I buy some Bitcoin. And that's why I say some of it is Schrodinger's asset class through this thing, which is normally Bitcoin is fully risk-on. Or at least it has been. And in this case, it was actually acting as risk off. Because, you know, normally I've been saying, hey, Bitcoin is the last functioning smoke alarm. Watch what Bitcoin does. That's what risk assets are going to do. So far, it's kind of holding again, I guess, on one level. But it was from a geopolitical standpoint, Bitcoin was going up as things were getting worse in the Middle East, as more radars in the U.S.

37:07were getting hit, as more drones, as Hagseth has gone. sorry, we can't really stop any of these drones as they're coming in. Bitcoin was getting bid. So I think there was some element of sort of it's not oil. It's not going to get killed by oil software, dead cat bounce stuff. I think some of it was actually asking, acting as risk off. My working thesis had been up until literally like two hours ago, this, you know, the war's not going as well as expected. And without a taco, risk is way too high. You know, we've got our taco. So let's see. It could be good for Bitcoin. It could be bad for Bitcoin.

37:55It depends if we go right back to the AI software is dead mode. Well, then Bitcoin's probably going to hit with that in the short run. And if it's risk back on, maybe not. Yeah, it's hard to tell. It is very much, but it has been better than expected. And I think that is, I think Bitcoiners should be encouraged by that. I am not feeling like, oh, I need to chase this yet. But it definitely has done better. You just said to me, hey, Luke, everything you know today, you know, two weeks ago, where's Bitcoin? And I would have said probably 55 ,000. And it's at, whatever, 68 ,000. And so it's definitely better than I would have expected.

38:45Some software bounce. But I think some of it really is Middle East capital flight, which I think true Bitcoiners would tell you, good, that's what it's supposed to friggin do, right? Like that's how it's supposed to work. yeah i mean i think as bitcoiners we quite often blame the fact that bitcoin trades like a risk asset as sort of information asymmetry like people actually don't understand what this asset is so like seeing it trade like this is incredibly promising um do you think we could be getting close to the point where bitcoin has matured into something different or do you think that still is way too early to say i think it's probably still too early to say but it was i think really encouraging right That, you know, look, people were paying$350 ,000 for a jet ride out of the Middle East.

39:37And you got to get your capital out. Like, let's be blunt. Hey, how much more if I want to bring, you know,$40 million of gold in me in the luggage? Like, well, it's going to be another. Versus, you know, can I take this thumb drive? Yeah, just put it in your pocket, right? that is sort of everything it's supposed to be and and it did it so let's see I think it's still too early but I you know again I want to acknowledge what I think we just saw which is I guess said for Bitcoiners I think very encouraging yeah so when you actually wrote in your letter that you were going to sort of get rid of some Bitcoin.

40:26What was your thinking there? Was that around the idea of like four year cycles? You thought that it was just going to roll over? I think it was in like the low hundreds that you maybe first said that, which clearly has been a great trade. When you first did that, I was like, Luke doesn't know this time's different. Who knew someone who's been in the markets for 30 years would know better. But like, what were you looking at when you first started getting rid of some Bitcoin? Yeah, it was I started getting nervous probably low hundreds i sold most of it call it 95 96 000 you know call it 23 24 ounces of gold right um what i started watching was that it was it started off just by it's not acting the way it should right like m2 money supply was like this and bitcoin wasn't reacting okay that's interesting but then it's you know well bitcoin always goes up by an order of magnitude peak to peak against gold cycle to cycle except it's not in fact you know i was one of them where i pointed out i was like bitcoin's unchanged versus gold over five years and that had never happened over any other five-year period okay and that's kind of one of those things of like maybe it means something, maybe it doesn't, right?

41:41As Bitcoin matures, you're going to see more of these things never. And as Bitcoin gets bigger, this has never happened or this always happens. Those will start breaking down. So that was something that broke down. In the same way that like last cycle, 2022, right? Bitcoin has never traded below a prior cycle. Huh? Didn't 2022. Didn't mean it was over, but also didn't mean it was a great buy at 40. I mean, in hindsight, you make the case, it probably was, but you understand what I'm saying. There were better buys to come.

42:16And then what I was seeing in sort of the bond markets, right? When I was seeing what in the Japanese bond market, it yields up, yen down, that's emerging market behavior. And that is in the JGB market, which is just, there's no way you can look at that as a market participant and go, oh, this is going to end up good for Bitcoin. Like that's, it's a, it's a horror show for risk assets. And so you just kind of go, eh, and then you see the way it's trading. And then, you know, there were legitimate concerns, you know, well, then there were within all of this, right. You were seeing a whole bunch of, you know, OG whales or whatever, just sort of these big long-term holders selling and it was holding up, right.

43:06Now, that was initially my reaction was, wow, these big guys are selling and it's not breaking like it used to. That's really encouraging. That was my initial read. And then it starts breaking. Selling$9 billion of coins. Right. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Right. And then it started breaking down. Then you started having like a whole slew of of of who I would say are pro Bitcoin people raising what to me as a tourist seeming to be relatively valid concerns around quantum and some of those types of things, which, again, I was not like, oh, this is an eminent. and like the markets are smarter than all of us.

43:49And I'm watching Bitcoin trade as all of these things are happening. And the final straw was just, and I wrote this and highlighted for clients before I ever sold. And it was just, you know, two different momentum indicators on a monthly momentum charts. I don't pay a lot of attention to technicals in the short term because I'm not a trader, but big sort of capital flow, monthly sort of technical moves I have been doing this 30 years and when I see them I have gotten my head kicked in enough to just not grow a brain and just respect them and I think I said something to that effect like I've been doing this long enough when when a technical indicator breaks down you know if they just kind of you know in for a smooth landing and cross that's like when they go through like a hot knife through butter that is like gtfo like game over see you later and is it quantum is it is it japan is it war is it i don't care doesn't matter get me out and i think the last part was just the context of understanding like and i i think i may have even said this to you before but i i've been doing this 30 years and bitcoiners have been doing bitcoin for three years and know way more than me about the technology and what have you, whatever.

45:06But doing this 30 years and advising, when I say doing this, advising institutional investors, consulting with institutional investors for 30 years with the marginal bid, so much of the marginal bid for Bitcoin coming from institutions over the last however many years and celebrated rightfully so by Bitcoiners. I also knew that chart, there's going to be no institutional interest in that chart for some time. Everyone and their mothers is going to go, I'll wait. I'll let it come to me. And that's kind of what they did. And so that was, it was not so much one thing. It was a whole lot of things.

45:43In the context of me, like, look, Bitcoin was a frigging enormous position for me personally. It was, you know, irresponsibly large. And so, you know, having a three to 5 % position in something and have it with that chart is a completely different animal than where I was. in terms of positioning. So I just, you know, I wanted to get, I wanted to degross significantly and I did. Yeah, on the quantum side, I like, I'm no quantum expert, but from people I've spoken to, I think that's mainly a narrative issue rather than anything real right now. Like I think quantum is still a long way off. And if something does happen, there's people working on ways that we can change Bitcoin to make it quantum resistant.

46:27But like to make this trade now a genius trade you obviously i gotta buy back huh you gotta buy back assuming your long-term thesis on bitcoin hasn't changed no it hasn't when when do you like what do you need to see before you start looking at this again i need to see more aggressive um nuclear printing if you will um is you know it's we literally have completely put on the back burner this whole ai thing for the last two weeks and i think you know if this around war is over which is sort of like they've managed to paper over ai concerns like friday after friday here in the u.s we had 92 000 jobs lost

47:16and you're seeing job openings in sort of every sector where you'd expect AI to curtail job openings you're seeing job openings in free fall in finance you're seeing them fall in tech you are seeing them drop in services and I just keep hearing more and more and seeing more and more signs in that world that this is accelerated in an exponential rate. And if that's the case, then our debt-based system, consumer credit is going to be a giant smoking crater because of AI. And we can debate if that's in three months or if that's in six months or if that's in 18 months. But from what I can tell, I don't think it's a debate that it's coming and you know we're seeing cracks in private credit i think there's gonna be a lot worse and so my point is is you know and then we still have the situation that japan and the japan trading like an emerging market where yields are going up and the currency is going down so even if we get a resolution on iran and geopolitics i still am I still don't like the risk.

48:33I still think we need very aggressive. I still think anything less than probably like negative interest rates is negative for risk, is tightening financial conditions. And so at the very least, I don't think that's a world where I'm going to wake up in a month and Bitcoin is going to be at$120 ,000. I'm going to go, oh, God, now I got to buy it back and what have you. I could be totally wrong. And if that happens, that's OK. You know, some of that I would expect gold would probably go up with that and ease some of that pain. But that's that to me, I still feel like we're in a risk off world. There's a lot of really big issues that have to be resolved.

49:18And when you've got a lot of debt, you don't have a lot of maneuvering room to resolve those things. it's interesting that you bring up the private credit stuff i was doing a show with jeff snyder last week and he talked all about this and the issues that are happening in the private credit markets and he was saying like while he's not sure there's potential that this leads into another financial crisis type situation do you think we could see another 2007 come out of this i don't know um i have not there are things that remind me of the early days of it right like the last week with the three months ago some black rock fund you know credit was marked at 100 and then you know three months later it's marked at zero you know it's like the the south park chicken meme right and it's gone right and and the one he was bringing up was blue owl i think yeah blue owl i had not you know we've written a little bit about that it's not you know i don't cover the company or anything but um people that i respect have uh um said there's some real issues with credit quality um and again i think if you take a step to me the it's a i think it's a symptom of a broader issue of the pace of ai disruption of productivity growth is too fast um you know we talked about this down in nashville right last fall where it's moving too fast and you're seeing this in youth unemployment.

50:51You're seeing this in credit delinquencies. You're starting to see unemployment move up a little bit off the lows. So could it be 2007? Maybe. But to me, it's a... The reason why I'm so concerned, why I still am sort of okay holding off on getting fully back to a really overweight Bitcoin position is unlike 07, debt to GDP in 07 at the federal level was 60%, right? We still had all that balance sheet room. The deficit was, I don't know, one and a half, 2%, maybe 2.5%, even with a war going on. Maybe it was 3%. But now, if you have credit issues, and I think you're going to have consumer credit issues

51:45simply because of the AI side. It is just, it is, you know, as we talked about in the fall, like this, just to me, it reminds me so much of what China did to the Rust Belt, except, you know, the Rust Belt, you know, the loss of 35 % of manufacturing jobs was ultimately, the pace of that was governed by the speed at which the Chinese could build factories. And as fast as they were, that was still, it took years and years. Like, this is going to go really fast. You know, it moves, you know, connect up a couple computers, boom, gone, right? So then people say, well, it still, you know, has hallucinations and, and, and, and of course, right?

52:23And that's the exact same, you know, basically the exact same thing I heard from union guys here in the Rust Belt, right? Well, the Chinese, they're, you know, they just do low quality stuff. They're just cheap. And it's like, well, their quality is good, but they're still just cheap. They're not going to move up scale. Well, their quality is still really good. They're really cheap and they're moving up scale. Well, my job's gone. And right. So like, you know, we can debate is the AI hallucinatory. We can debate how quickly. We can't debate that it's going to keep getting better faster than you think it is.

52:56And so we can debate, hey, is this a three month away problem? Is this a six, nine, 12, 18 month away problem? It's probably not a two year away problem. And again. look in 2008 this is february of 08 so we've already had right we've got 2005 home price you know greenspan raises rates in 04 summer of 04 summer of 05 home prices peak start to roll over fall of 06 um subprime losses start piling up at that point oh the worst case like 60,$80 billion in losses. Maybe 100 worst case. That was like a huge shocker. Late in 06, I remember that, if I remember right. May of 07, Bernanke says subprime is contained in essence.

53:41July of 07, poof, 3 billion in mortgage funds gone. Wait, what? Even then, the S &P set a record in October. February of 08. So after all of that, right before Bear Stearns goes boom in March of 08. Gets bailed out for$2. In February of 08, New York Times reports that the mortgage delinquency rate, mortgage delinquency and homes in foreclosure is across all homes in America is 7.3%. 92.7 % of mortgages in America were current. Month later, Bear Stearns, over the summer, Fannie Freddie, bazooka lehman literally seven months later eight months later we were that close to the entire financial system collapsing with 92.7 percent of mortgages current so the whole debate around this ai ai is not going to take all the white collar jobs like you're right not it's going to take a few of them and those people are going to pay their mortgages and their car loans and credit card bills and then those things are going to blow up something in private credit and private credit's going to have an issue.

54:58And then the banks are going to pull back on lending and da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da. So to me, I don't know the whole private credit thing and how levered they are and where they're connected. I know the whole system's highly levered. And I know that we are, as a government, as a federal government, with receipts at all time highs, we are barely covering entitlements plus interest expense. and any kind of recession will force us into default on the treasuries or entitlements or print the money and they'll print the money. So, um, that to me is like the, I don't know how, I don't know how they're going to get there, but I'm like, I'm pretty sure, you know, to me, the only debate is, is like how fast, you know, it's, it's, you know, like in golf, right.

55:46They don't ask you, right. They don't ask in golf. They don't ask you how, They just ask you how many, you know, you know, in how far, you know, in AI disruption of the economy and will it create a deflationary like sort of a credit crisis? For me, it's not, you know, how it's just how many months. See, I've not heard that or have not thought about it that way where you talk about the Rust Belt and China taking those jobs. And in reality, it doesn't matter who's taking the jobs. Just someone's taking the jobs and they're not yours anymore. And we've seen what happened in the Rust Belt. and there's like a there was a massive growth in like the opioid epidemic and alcoholism and people dying and it was very isolated from the coasts but this is not going to be this is going to be entirely different and um it's uh it's really scary like why do things just i don't know if this is doomerism but things just seem to get worse luke you know it's i don't know it it's a fascinating study in the American psyche, I think, that it's just like, you know, versus say like the Russian psyche, right?

56:51Like you read a Russian novel and you're like, oh my God, it is like one bad thing after another. And then you like look at Russian history, you're like, well, that checks out, right? Whereas in America, right? It's like American movies, they all have the same plot, right? Which is like, oh, something happens and redemption gets the girl happy ending. That's like all American movies.

57:14you talk to someone in the Rust Belt in America, like it's not all happy movie. Like we've been to any number of funerals for kids that overdosed, parents that overdosed, suicides, what have you. We saw these jobs lost. You know, 1965, Cleveland was like the fifth richest city in America. You know, by 1980, the river, or 1975, the river was on fire, right? So like it happens fast. And, but it's fascinating, right? the psyche of America of like, hey, we always get a happy ending. People are like, you never short America. You never short America over the span of your lifetime. You shorted America in November 23rd, 1963, the day after they shot JFK, and you covered your short in 1980, it's a pretty good time to short America.

58:04You shorted America in October 1929, you covered your short in like 1933, 1935, pretty good short. right there's periods of times where like stuff happens you know and in different parts of the country right if you shorted the american you know farm belt right before the dust bowl horribly that was a great short it was a disaster um

58:32and when you have these losses of of meaning right plains native americans in this country They lost their meaning. They were put on reservations. They drank themselves to death as they lost their meaning, even though it was a better way of life. They lost their meaning. You take a bunch of Soviet apparatchiks and under the Soviets, things were not great, especially in the 70s and 80s. They were not great at all. They got a better way of life. And they drank and shot themselves to death at staggering rates through the 90s because they lost their meaning. 2000s I lived through it Rust Belt you take people's meaning away they drink and shoot themselves to death at staggering rates and so there's like this you know a lot of the people that are sort of in charge of the AI renaissance are for lack of a better word autists right they are brilliant people whose EQ is probably not really high um like oh it's just all gonna be great we're all never gonna have to work again elon's like well we're just gonna have everything's gonna be like free and you're like how about between here and there dude like you know um and he doesn't have to think about those things i was whatever 100 trillion dollars i wouldn't either um but the rest of us do and that's like the reality And forget about the social side of it for a moment, the credit side of it.

1:00:06Every single person that loses their job or loses wages to an AI, none of these people are living debt free. Like there are so few people living debt free. So I just, to me, that's like a major, major story around, you know, I think ultimately rates will be much lower. They could be negative. I don't know how the universal basic income job guarantee. There's a lot of different ways you can try to handle this.

1:00:40But we're not at the level of sort of panic that I would like to where I'm like, OK, let's go. I want to own everything. I'm much more rifle shot approach, and I'm in a very cautious position right now. Yeah, the crazy thing there about like shorting America is I can see the sort of fabric of society breakdown that you're painting here. Like the loss of meaning is incredibly impactful. But at the same time, it will probably be American companies that benefit the most. So it's just like even greater wealth divide. And I think UBI seems just an obvious solution to this that I think will be tried.

1:01:18Who knows if it'll work. But at the end of the day, it seems to all lead back to someone's going to press the money printing button. I think so. So how long do you think we have until this snowball gets out of control and someone does have to do a turbo print? I don't know. Probably only three to six months, depending on AI. I mean, remember where we're literally like two weeks ago before the whole Iran thing where it was like.

1:01:50uh you know we literally had just gotten where you know uh um you know jack had fired 40 percent of his workers right and it was like holy cow you know and sort of all of the you know you know kevin bacons you know you know everything is under control or what does he say in animal house right remain calm right the people those people in marcus they're like well jack you know he has way too many people anyway and he had way too many people at x and they got rid of all those people and it didn't affect x's thing at all i'm like you're missing the entire point dude yes okay let's say you're 100 right and let's say they do that let's say there's lots of organizations like i didn't dinner like last fall with a corporate exec who's fairly high up he's like yeah corporate like 60 % of corporate is just showing up and I'm like that's insane right so you go and be saying big corporations you're showing up do your job go home okay great how many of those just show up do your job like and again 92.7 % only 7.3 % of mortgages going into delinquency or default kaboom whole system so 60 % of the job is showing up and just like what percent of that's ai gonna take like morgan stanley just blew out three percent of the workers and with record profits by the way and they didn't say anything about ai uh in the release but then new york post over the weekends like that execs are quietly saying it's ai related that they're just getting more efficient three percent three percent and we're not a manufacturer people like well they're just all gonna go to construction and trades and all this you're like come on you know i've seen that movie like you don't teach old dogs new trick i'm an old dog you know 50 year olds don't go like leave banking i well i was a commercial lender and i had a golf membership i was every done every day to four on the course by five and now i'm out of a job i got a mortgage i got two kids in college i got a two thousand dollar a month lease on my mercedes or my Range Rover, and now I got to go learn how to trade?

1:03:59Come on. These people are high. This is not how that's going to go. Maybe on the margin, but for most of them, no. So I think it's going to happen faster than people think. I really do. And I think, look, the jobs number down 92 ,000. Everything is star-spangled awesome, and we're losing to 92 ,000 jobs. I think it's a big deal. and and it was fascinating because the iran war no one said a thing like it wasn't even if if there was no war and we printed that jobs number holy cow nobody even noticed it was like wag the dog i guess the the positive notes close out on is that for people for the people that do harness ai and use it in like an interesting and meaningful and and maybe novel way there's going to be massive opportunity there'll be a billion dollar company run by one person at some point so there is hope out there oh yeah right like that's you know I think we even talked about this last time in Nashua like there's a couple 8th graders in a garage happening like right now and there's they're going to put some like 10 billion US company out of business and you know we literally said that in October this was right mid October when we were together and in February software Whereas the service is like, yep.

1:05:22Right. Which is essentially happening. A couple of eighth graders in a garage can now vibe code. Like that was the fear. Right. And, and AI is only going to get better. So there's going to be a lot more of those. And that's like super exciting and super scary. Right. It gets like, you know, you've got to be on your game. Like you can get disintermediated in some of these traditional white collar positions and you can be a disintermediator. And so like, okay, here we go. Disruption everywhere. Disruption is the theme of this show, I think. Luke, this has been awesome. Thank you very much for making the time.

1:06:00I will let you go. But before we do, tell everyone where they can get your newsletter and follow you. I'm sure everyone knows. Absolutely. No, thank you. I appreciate it. If they're interested in more information about our different mass market and institutional research products at fftt-llc.com. and Twitter or X, sorry, Elon, at Luke Groman, L-U-K-E-G-R-O-M-E-N. I still can't get you saying X either. Luke, thank you so much, man. I appreciate it. Thanks for having me on, buddy. We'll talk to you soon. Thank you.

1:06:47Thank you.

From the publisher

"Our entire financial system will blow up without their factories, without their oil. And they know that. So they can wait."

Luke Gromen is a macroeconomic analyst, investor and founder of FFTT.

In this episode, we get into whether the Iran war exposed a far bigger geopolitical shift than most people realise, why Luke thinks missiles and drones may have changed global power forever, and what all of this means for oil, markets, Bitcoin and the future of the dollar system.

We also get into why Bitcoin held up better than expected during the conflict, why Luke still thinks risk assets face serious danger ahead, and how AI could trigger a major credit event faster than almost anyone expects.

THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS:

ANCHORWATCH

BLOCKWARE

LEDN

BITKEY

SWAN

CLUB ORANGE

FOLLOW:

Danny Knowles: https://x.com/_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny

Luke Gromen: https://x.com/LukeGromen

More from What Bitcoin Did

All 145 episodes
Iran, Oil and the Next Financial CrisisWhat Bitcoin Did · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO