Luck Isn’t Random—It’s Designed | Judd B. Kessler

25:18So that would have been settling for silver. That would have been pretending that what I wanted first was the 4.30 reservation. And the reason it would have worked is that it's much less desirable for folks to eat at 4.30, except maybe in some retirement communities, but it would have succeeded in getting her the reservation. How do you convey that to a type A person or just somebody? Because to me, being an entrepreneur, that's a hard pill to swallow. Sure. If that happens and you're like, I lucked out, I got something anyway, but I didn't get my desire. I know that there's still a sting to that that sticks with you.

26:08Look, it's in the name, right? I call it settling for silver. We don't want to be settling, right? It's not great. But I think if you think about the different environments when the strategy might be helpful, you can start to see it's a trade-off, right? There is a chance I could have gotten the 730 reservation, been the reservation hero, right? But I have to think about which is more important. Is it getting her something or getting her the ideal reservation? It also, think about this also with applying to colleges. So because colleges care about your decision to matriculate, they want high yield.

26:45They want to know if they admit you that you'll come. they have early decision a lot of elite schools or early action is a different version of this policy but with early decision you apply and if you get admitted you're basically committing to go it's like a guaranteed matriculation a guaranteed increase in yield but you can only apply to one school early decision because you're committing to go so you can't send 12 early decision applications. So then you have to decide where are you going to apply. Now, I talked about on the job market not wanting to signal Harvard or MIT. If you are thinking about applying an early decision to a school that you're very unlikely to get into because they have very high admission standards and your application just isn't there, then if you do that, even though that's your gold choice college, it's going to be a waste.

27:39If you were thinking more strategically, which type A personalities often like to do, like you should be applying to an early decision to a school that might be your second or third choice that would actually admit you, that there's some chance they would admit you if you applied early decision, but maybe wouldn't admit you if you applied regular because the schools are going to reward you with applying early because they want folks who are - Yeah, and it's a smaller pool of candidates by saying I'm early decision. Yeah, exactly. And the acceptance rates are higher if you apply early than apply regular.

28:08So there is an advantage. And if you apply early to a school that's a super reach school, that's really your gold choice, it's basically wasting that one shot. And so I think when you start thinking about these different settings where the tradeoff is apparent, then you can decide. It could be that you want to go for the superstar school or the super reservation, or if you're an entrepreneur hiring somebody to work with you, it might be that you only want to do the startup if you can hire the absolute best chief technology officer or something. But maybe you go after the slightly less good chief technology officer who's going to be excited that you're going after them and be there and be committed.

28:50And in that case, maybe the settling for silver will work. There's a great example of medical students trying to game the matching system and it actually working against them. I think oftentimes, again, we feel this pressure that everyone's gaming, so we should be gaming. A lot of the hidden markets that I talk about, that I've been talking about, are not designed by academics, not designed by economists. And so they have these opportunities to game. We think the gaming is hard for people, right? It rewards folks who are listening to this podcast and learning the tricks. because it rewards people who have invested more in figuring out how the system works.

29:27And so it would be nice if you could design a system that does not reward that kind of gaming, where it would be safe to just tell the truth. And then we can do the harder thing of thinking about, or the additionally hard thing, I should say, of figuring out what we like the best and second best and so on. And there are a bunch of markets and more and more every year that are designed so that it is safe for you to tell the truth. So we call it strategy proof. in economics, it basically means that there's no benefit to trying to strategize your game. So the residency match, which you just referenced, is one of those where the best thing that you can do in this market is rank your preferences, in this case for jobs at residency, at hospitals for residency programs, from your favorite to your least favorite.

30:11The same thing is true in a lot of school choice systems. So the New York City elementary school and high school admissions process now operates this way as well, where as a parent, I rank my favorite school first down to my least favorite. But it is absolutely the case. And a bunch of research has shown this, that people get into these systems, they are told the best thing you can do is rank your preferences. And they think that they think they can outsmart the system and they flip their preferences around and can be very dangerous or damaging. And I have this memory of being at a party where, it was match day for these residency programs.

30:50And so all the medical school students who were going to graduate and go on to these programs learned where they matched. And I talked to this woman and she was devastated. And it's like, what happened? Well, it's like, I got my second choice. I'm sorry, you didn't get your first. She's like, yeah, but really what I wanted was my third choice. I preferred my third choice to my second choice. And now I'm going to this place that I don't really want to go. I have to leave New York. And I could have switched my preference ranking, ended up getting to stay in New York. And it's like, oh man, I don't know what prompted her to do that, but it was, it's one of these things where when it's safe to be honest about your preferences, you got to learn that and then you got to follow through.

31:28If you're still overpaying for wireless, it's time to say yes to saying no. That's Mint Mobile's whole thing. Their favorite word is no. No contracts, no monthly bills, no overages, no hidden fees, no BS. And that's why I love Mint Mobile premium wireless service for just 15 bucks a month. Ditch those overpriced plans with jaw-dropping bills, surprise overages, and all the hidden fees. Mint starts at just$15 a month. And you're not giving up coverage. Every plan comes with high-speed data and unlimited talk and text on the nation's largest 5G network. You can even use your own phone, keep your number, and bring all your contacts with you.

32:04No hassle. Mint Mobile is unbeatable at this pricing. Ready to say yes to saying no? Make the switch at mintmobile.com slash charm. That's mintmobile.com slash charm. Upfront payment of$45 required, equivalent to$15 per month. Limited time new customer offer for the first three months only. Speeds may slow above 35 gigabytes on an unlimited plan. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. Think you're the only one struggling with performance issues in the bedroom? You're not. And now there's an easier way to fix it from home. That's where RexMD comes in. It's an online telehealth service that helps men get real FDA-approved medications straight to your door.

32:44Everything's done online. No doctor's office, no waiting rooms, no awkward conversations. Here's how it works. First, share your symptoms, health history, and goals through a short quiz. Then, a U.S. licensed provider reviews your information and prescribes medication, if appropriate. Your treatment gets sent to you with free two-day delivery. It's that easy. And Rex MD team is there for ongoing care. Just send a message. What I love about Rex MD, total discretion, private consultations, and direct-to-door delivery in discreet packaging. No pharmacy trips needed. Plus, it's care that you can trust.

33:20FDA-approved medications tailored to individual needs. Over 475 ,000 men have chosen Rex MD, with over 50 million tablets prescribed and delivered. This isn't just about performance. It's about feeling secure in yourself and your relationships again. Don't put your love life on hold. Take back control of your confidence and intimacy. Get up to 95 % off treatment with Rex MD. Visit rexmd.com slash charm. That's rexmd.com slash charm. See full details and usage at rexmd.com. Prescription required. Results may vary. You argue that we're all market designers of our own time. and this was another concept that blew me away.

34:03We obviously know these hidden markets that we encounter, but we don't think about ourselves as market makers. Help me with my email inbox where everyone is demanding my time. The thing about a hidden market is that it's deciding how to allocate a scarce resource without relying on prices. And once you think about it that way, a scarce resource that you control is your time and attention. How much time are you going to spend in that inbox? which emails you're going to respond to. I have not yet tried to get people to pay me to respond to their emails more quickly. That would be allowing price to enter in.

34:36So instead, we have to decide, all right, how are we going to allocate our time and attention? And are we going to do it in a way that benefits the folks that are trying to get it? And are we going to do it in a way that benefits us? My email inbox hacks are basically to... For me, it was as I was writing the book, thinking about this kind of stuff. I realized that a lot of what I was doing was wrong. I was responding to follow-up requests much more quickly than to somebody who sent me an email once and then let it be. And so by reacting to the follow-ups, I was incentivizing people trying to get my attention to just continually nudge me.

35:14And I reacted to that because I don't like being nudged. I don't like seeing 12 emails in my inbox all from the same person about this one thing I have to do. And so I was, if you told me that my kids were being more annoying to try to get my attention, I would like to understand, okay, I shouldn't reward that because that will create more tantrums. But with the email, I was rewarding the tantrums, so to speak. I was also prioritizing things that I thought I could do quickly. But of course, a lot of those things are not worth our time and attention. It feels good to get them done, but it's not actually beneficial.

35:47And so I stopped responding to certain types of messages and started to see that I got less of those messages. If I don't respond that quickly to my student requests for things that they can easily learn in the syllabus by just carefully reading the syllabus, then if I stop responding within 24 hours, maybe then they figure it out on their own and stop emailing me those kinds of questions. I apologize to any of my students who are listening. People might realize I'm strategically ignoring them, but it is a way to get people who are trying to get your time and attention to be more respectful of it.

36:22What happened to your professor rankings being unresponsive to your students? A slight ding, but probably overall I'm happier for it. But the benefit that I get from having a more sane work day is probably worth it. So let's talk about last in, first out collaboration because so many of us find ourselves in these situations. This is another email trick that I adopted to be more productive, which is when I have, so now I go to my inbox and I say, all right, I'm gonna ignore all the stuff that is not very essential that I work on today. That's not important and time sensitive. But now it's like, all right, I have 10 emails that are important and time sensitive.

37:03Which one am I going to deal with first? And there are equity considerations that maybe the person's been waiting the longest I should respond to first because they've already been waiting maybe a few hours for this response. but I actually flip it. So I do last in first out, meaning whoever's sent me the email most recently, I'm going to respond to first. And the reason is I think it's more efficient in the sense of a lot of what people are asking me for is feedback on something. And the people who have emailed me most recently might actually be working on it as I'm reading their email, that it might be that if I respond to them right now, then they actually are gonna be able to use my response in what they're doing, as opposed to somebody emailed me four hours ago, they've probably moved on to something else.

37:51And so whether I email them immediately or I email them two hours from now, like it will still be as useful for them because they're going to have to turn back to this project that we're working on together before they can benefit from my response. I'm thinking about all of your smart students listening to this podcast being the last one to email you, waiting till 5 p.m. They have to know when I'm logging in and that's the trick. So if I do communicate when I'm going to be checking email, then their optimal strategy would be to all pile in on that last second. But I mix it up so they don't know for sure.

38:24Another challenge, and Johnny alluded to this, is having a plan B. And so many of us want to go all in, and we feel that signaling all in works to our advantage. There's a cost to having a plan B. So walk us through what we can do strategically there to design our luck. the issue that johnny raised before about not wanting to settle for silver that's like a kind of a difficult pill to swallow one technique that you can use is having a good plan be a good economists call it an outside option something that you can fall back on if you don't get what you want from a market and the reason that's helpful is that then it's safer for you to be more aggressive, like going for gold.

39:09In the example from before, if I'm trying to get a restaurant reservation for my wife in the Napa Valley, and I've already secured a pretty good plan B. So I got Thomas Keller's ad hoc. It's like another, it's not the French laundry, it's like the same restaurateur and slightly less expensive, which is great for me. If I'm paying for the dinner, I have that as a backup plan. I can always cancel that reservation. there, that's a fine thing to do. I'm also thinking about this a month early because I'm trying to get the French laundry reservation. But if I have the ad hoc reservation as a backup, then I can be more aggressive in the primary market.

39:47Then I don't have to worry that if I don't get a reservation on Saturday night, my wife's going to be eating bad room service food, that I have something that I can use as a backup. And so sometimes having that backup can allow you to be more aggressive. It's the same logic as having a good safety school that you think you're going to be able to get into. If you really like your safety school, then maybe you can be more aggressive on your initial applications. Maybe you can apply to that super dream reach school with your early decision because you're going to get into the state school, like your grades qualify you and that's going to work out great.

40:20So that plan B could be kind of the comfort that you need for it to make sense for you to go for gold. I found the same in the dating markets, It's much to my wife's chagrin. Having a great plan B always helped me be more aggressive. As long as your wife never thinks she was the plan B, then you're golden. Exactly. We don't want to know what's going on behind the scenes. Now, one of the situations that I think many of us have found ourselves in is the Costco parking lot, where it is a true goal for gold situation. How do we discern that and walk us through what's going on there? This idea of like, when should you settle for silver?

40:57When should you go for gold? So the Costco parking lot is where I think you can develop some intuition for this. Costco parking lot, it's first come first serve. Okay, but it's dynamic, meaning that the first people into the lot are going to take the spots right by the entrance. As when you come later in the day, it's possible that the people who were parked out front have left. But usually when you are driving into the lot, you can't see the front of the store. There's all these rows of cars that block your view. And so you have to start deciding, okay, as I'm driving through, I see a spot. It's not great, but it's not that far a walk to the front.

41:30Should I take that? Should I settle for silver? Or do I go up to the front and go for gold? And in that case, you want to start to think about what do I have to gain if I drive all the way to the front? What do I have to lose? And there are some people, the reason I like this example is that there are some people who are like, they always drive to the front. They always try to get that ideal spot. They think it would never make sense to settle for silver. And then there are people who are like, I just take a spot. I don't care where it is. I never go for gold. I just take the first spot I see.

42:00But I think the way to develop intuition for these other markets that might matter more than where you park in Costco is, all right, in which cases is the going for gold worth the risk? Is the slot almost entirely full? And if you miss the spot, then somebody's going to swoop in and take it. In cases like that, maybe you do settle for silver. When I'm fighting for my French laundry reservation, if I don't take the 430 slot immediately, somebody else is going to take it and it's going to be gone. So maybe that's a case where the same way I would take the parking spot, I take the 430 reservation.

42:33Sometimes I'm with my kids and I don't want to have to deal with them as I'm bringing all this stuff back from Costco and I don't want to have to walk with them through a parking lot where people are turning around. Then it's worth going for gold because the gains that I might get from getting a spot right up front really trump whatever risk I have of having to circle the law and find another spot. And so that kind of gives you some intuition for like, when is it really worth going for it? And when should you play it safe? The other market we haven't talked as much about is lotteries. And we do encounter these as well.

43:02And I know growing up, my dad was in a season ticket lottery way before I was even old enough to really go and enjoy the games. But he knew at some point, like, you just got to keep trying. So walk us through the strategy around gaming lotteries? Lotteries are the one where we think it's the most based on chance and that you don't have any kind of additional way to tilt the scales in your favor. But it turns out, depending on the lottery rules, you often can make yourself lucky in those lotteries. So one is the obvious one, which is just enter more times. And Johnny's laughing, but it's like, sometimes there are ways to enter that are not necessarily obvious, right?

43:40You're trying to get season tickets. You're entering yourself in the lottery for season tickets. But if you have a friend who would do that for you, who might win the lottery to season tickets, then you pay them for the tickets and they give them to you or your partner. Or once you're old enough to qualify, then you can also enter along with your dad. All of a sudden, we're getting more bites at the apple. And this happens with ticket lotteries for rush tickets for theater shows where you can get two tickets to the show if you win. It used to be how to be at the theater before the show to get the tickets.

44:14And then if I went with my buddy, then we could both enter for two tickets. And basically, only one of us needs to win to go together. Now, if you wanted to, you could enter online and you only have to go down to the theater if you win the tickets. So if I really want to see something and I can get my friends to all enter for me, they'll have to show up and show their credit card and show that they were the winner. But the rules might allow them to just hand me the tickets after they pick them up. And so those kinds of tricks can be helpful. And that strategy works for other kind of higher stakes lotteries as well.

44:44So there's a, the U.S. has a lottery historically, they'll get a visa to come to the U.S. And your whole family gets to come to the U.S. if you win this diversity visa lottery. And you and your partner can both enter and hope to make it to the U.S. And you're just increasing your chances as you enter more times. And then other lotteries, and this kind of gets more complicated and more interesting as well, basically reward prior losers. So this comes up a lot with hunting tags for big game hunting, where there are a lot of recreational hunters who want to hunt certain animals. There's only so many that the ecologists have said, we can kill in any given hunting season.

45:24And so again, much more demand and supply of these hunting tags have the right to go out and hunt for that animal. And so what do they do? They do lotteries, but they want folks who've been unlucky in the past to be lucky and to have a better shot in the future. They want to kind of spread the benefits of these exciting hunts out across many people over people's lifetimes. And so if you've lost, say, nine years in a row, some states, when you enter this year, will give you 10 entries instead of once. You have 10 times the likelihood of winning this year. Some go even further. There was one state that switched, South Dakota switched from giving you those, the 10 entries to giving you, it was a squared, no, it was a cubed system.

46:10So they gave you, it would be instead of 10 entries, you get 10 cubed, you get a thousand entries for this year, as opposed to a new person. And so in those kinds of lotteries that were word losing in the past, then you want to start entering as soon as possible. As soon as you might want to hunt, you should be entering the lottery every year. And some of the states allow you to enter a lottery and say, I actually can't hunt this year. I just want to enter and lose so that I can build up my chances for next year. So you can say, there's a year I just want to enter and lose. But that's the strategy to play in lotteries that remember who has won and who has lost in the past.

46:44What are your holiday traditions? Putting up a minimum of six trees? Decorating every room with a different theme? Whatever it is, here's one way to make those traditions extra special. Start the season with Etsy. On Etsy, you'll discover original pieces from small shops to help you celebrate your way. Shop Etsy for holiday decor that makes you feel seen. Special starts on Etsy. Tap the banner to shop now. This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast? Smart move. Being financially savvy? Smart move. Another smart move? Having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto.

47:23Bundling. Just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state. In a lot of these lotteries around tickets, there's a resale value too. So even if you might not be ready, you win, you can still cover your losses by not going to the game and selling them, flipping them. This is where the hidden markets that I've talked about, you see the kind of traditional economics argument starting to work its way back in because the Taylor Swift tickets or these other live event tickets, when they're allocated in these hidden markets at a price that's too low for the market to clear, then you get speculators.

48:07You get ticket brokers who send their bots in to buy the tickets. If it's a first-come, first-served race and you're racing against a bot, no matter how fast you click, the bot, the computerized program, is going to beat you at getting those tickets. And then they're going to turn around and sell them at whatever high price they think they can get. So the speculators are going to enter and make it look more like a visible market. And so if you are fine paying a high price for those tickets, then you might be fine with that because there you are being able to get the ticket to the show. But if you are thinking about this from the perspective of designing a market, you don't love that because the venue, the baseball stadium or Taylor Swift for her Aeros tour, or I talk about Hamilton tickets, the tickets to see that show, the producers didn't want to set the high prices.

49:00They wanted to set lower prices. spread the benefits of seeing that live event more broadly across the potential fan base. They didn't want it to just be something the rich could do. And so then the speculators and their bots become a problem that you are trying to solve for. And you as a market participant, you can't solve it. You can't. If you want to see the show and pay a price that's high to get the ticket, that's going to be what you have to do. But as a market designer looking in at these markets, man, we got to fix this. Not every birthday that my wife celebrates is a milestone one where we might spring for French laundry reservations.

49:35But if for some of the times for a birthday, we'll go to the US Open. And I recently bought tickets to the US Open right when they were released. It was like the pre-sale period. I went in and I went maybe within 20 minutes of the sale starting. And there were some tickets that were that I could get at face value. But already the majority of tickets that were being sold for the US Open for this particular night were being resold. People had bought them within the first 20 minutes and then were flipping them immediately. These are not people who bought the tickets to see tennis and then realized they couldn't go.

50:09They bought them to resell them. And I don't think that's what we want our ticket markets to be like. So we have to think about how to fix that and push the speculators out. Sometimes there's hidden markets within our relationship. And this is a bit more of a personal question for me with mental load around chores and a newborn, how do we actually work through this hidden market to save our relationship? All right. Congratulations on the newborn. Yeah. So this is back to you as a market designer. This is actually a nice one because you are both a market designer deciding how to allocate chores and your market participant cooperatively.

50:44And your market participant because you have to do the chores, some subset. So here's my advice for folks in this situation, it worked for me and hopefully it'll work for you all as well. I talk a lot about in the book about efficiency, equity as being two of the things that we really care about. And for a lot of household chores, there are a few kind of component pieces. And I'm stealing this framework I'm about to tell you about from an author named Eve Rotsky and other folks have written about this. But a task requires conception. You have to understand understand that the task is happening.

51:18As you have to conceive of the task, you have to plan for the task, and then you have to execute the task. And a lot of times in our households, we try to split up those pieces. So like my wife might realize that something has to get done, and then she might plan for it to happen, but then she might ask me to actually go and do it. So she's going to realize we need certain something from the grocery store, she's going to call and make the order, but I'm going to go and pick it up. And so that will sometimes work. and for certain tasks, you are stuck in that situation. But for the most part, it is more efficient if one person is doing the conception, planning and execution of a task all the time.

51:57So if we're thinking about kids afterschool activities, so this is something that I deal with personally a lot, it is much easier if it is just, say, me who is trying to think, okay, what are we going to have them do each day? What are their afterschool classes going to be? Who's going to pick them up? Just planning that. And so I know all of the pieces that have to get moved around. If my wife and I both tried to do that task, we would both be worrying about it all the time. We'd both be trying to make plans for who's going to pick up who when. And that would be inefficient. And so a lot of, I think this comes up a lot in relationships where, again, this is, I'm generalizing now, but you hear a lot of times in heterosexual relationships, the mom will complain that the dad is not helping with the stuff around the house.

52:43And the dad will say, I am, I'm doing a lot of stuff. Look at all the stuff I'm doing. And what is happening is that one of the issues is they're not realizing that they might be duplicating. Certainly the moms on average do a lot more of this stuff. So that is a data back setup. But the dads might not realize, like, they're also doing conception and planning of tasks. They're doing some of the execution. But if they just split the tasks wholesale, then it would be much more efficient. You wouldn't be duplicating efforts on conception and planning, which are hidden, which are happening in people's minds, usually.

53:16And then the second additional piece, the way to think of that as being how to make it efficient to not duplicate efforts. but the way to make it equitable is a concept from economics that's called envy freeness so this is how my wife and i split chores in the house so we think about the whole doing the conception planning and execution the whole thing of a task and then we divide tasks and we keep deciding who should do what until we get to a point where we look at what each other one is doing and we say man i would much rather be doing my tasks than be doing your tasks like I do not envy what you have to do.

53:55Because for me, my wife wakes up much earlier than I do. I'm a kind of night owl. She's an early bird. So a lot of the tasks that deal with the morning, getting the kids ready for school, making breakfast, packing their backpacks, she handles that because then I don't have to worry about it. And I really appreciate it. And as a night owl, I can do stuff at night, get the kids down for bed, prep anything that needs to be prepped for the evening, for the next day. And then that way, we are both doing a set of stuff that the other one appreciates. And we know that we are splitting it up evenly. We don't present the other one because we think they're doing less.

54:33We appreciate that what they're doing is something we do not want to take on. What do you say to the guy whose wife is better at the planning and the strategizing? If you rely only on who's better at a particular task, then you have a problem if your wife is better than you at everything, which is what a lot of men will say, to not have to do anything around the house. And I think it behooves people to think about what their strengths actually are. And I think people are better at planning and execution than they give themselves credit for. If they are successful in other parts of their life, then they are planning and executing on certain tasks.

55:13And so they should think about, all right, what are the things that in the house I actually could plan and execute in a way that makes the work in the household easier for us because we're being more efficient, but also makes it more equitable. And again, some households are structured differently. If your partner, if you work outside of the home and your partner works inside the home, then that could satisfy envy-freeness to say, I'm going to do all the going out and earning money, and you're going to do all the household production, and I don't envy you and you don't envy me. like that relationship structure satisfies envy freeness that's fine but if both folks are going out and working outside the home probably when they come back they should be figuring out a way to share those tasks even if look my wife's a better cook than me so when it's cooking it's it always is her but i have to then pick up the slack and some other area that we might be equally good at and it's going to be my turn to do that as we wrap here what's a market that you're currently in your own life trying to crack the code on?

56:18Oh, that's a good one. No, so the writing of the book has gotten me to think carefully about the markets in my own life. So now I'm looking at these markets that a lot of them cover in the book that I am very eager to fix as an outsider. And so like the ticket one, the resale ticket one is really getting under my skin. And I really want to figure out how can we set up the ways that we sell live event tickets where we don't give billions of dollars a year to people who are not adding any value and are just coming in and buying tickets that were supposed to be sold to us for$60 and then selling them back to us for$160.

56:58And by the way, Ticketmaster is taking 30 % of the$160 on the sale. So they're not necessarily going to help on their own, right? So it's like, we need to figure out how to better design that market. And that's one of them, but that's the one that right now maybe because - I don't think they'll be too thrilled with you tinkering with it. I know they have a lot of profits at stake. It is, we are the fans and we should. They don't care. So the goal is finding someone who does, and maybe it's regulation. It's make a lot of enemies on a single podcast. But no, I don't. I think that it is in our interests.

57:36If we want to make sure that the fans get to see these live events, that we figure out how to make it more equitable and not let the ticket brokers take so much of the surplus. Yeah, that's the unfortunate part that the ticket sellers can double dip and essentially make money on both transactions, the initial and then the resale. Even in the 70s, before Ticketmaster, headlining acts would buy the first several rows of their management would of their own shows so they could, the show will be sold out and they could sell those tickets and make double, triple the price on it. There's always going to be somebody with their hands in the cookie jar.

58:17Look, if I can imagine that, I have a friend from graduate school who wrote one of his dissertation work on this. Sometimes it's, you want to be the one to charge the high prices, but you want to make it look like somebody else is doing it. But it's very costly to involve all these third parties. If you think the first few rows should be very expensive, then you can sell that at the high prices. And that's fine. If the managers are doing it to line their own pockets rather than the artists, then of course they're acting just like the scalpers are. But it's something that you want to think about whether there is a solution for.

58:50I'm not satisfied with saying it's just the way it is. I'm going to give up. I want to push on it. There's other ways. For myself, I've understood that market my whole life being a musician. And of course, AJ will tell you, I don't go to big shows. In fact, your new favorite band, your new favorite Taylor Swift, is playing at the coffee shop down the street for$5. Go support her. You'll be blown away and she's going to hang out with you. She's going to sign all your stuff and she's going to put you on the guest list for next time. You just gave us a way to get lucky by design. You just gave us a hint that's not in the book as a way to break the live event code.

59:30Thank you for sharing all these great strategies. Where can our audience find out more about your work in the book? Yeah, so the book is called Lucky by Design, the hidden economics you need to get more of what you want. They can go to my website, judbkessler.com or just search for Lucky by Design. Yeah, I'm excited for folks to check it out. Thank you for joining us. Thanks for having me. Thank you, Jed.

1:00:02And now I'd like to showcase one of our X-Factor Accelerator members. Take it away, Michael. Hi, my name is Michael and I'm an accountant for an insurance company. Before the X-Factor Accelerator, I struggled to build and maintain close connections in my social circle because I wasn't the best at sharing thoughts and feelings with others. The reason I joined the X-Factor Accelerator is to improve my overall social confidence with my family, friends, colleagues, new acquaintances, and in my social and romantic life. My favorite thing about the X Factor Accelerator is that it helped me overcome my fear and anxiety when interacting at large social events so that I can now confidently approach others and make new connections with ease.

1:00:46What I'm looking forward to now is using the skills, techniques, and experience I've learned to create long-lasting and more meaningful relationships with the people I care about most in life. Thank you, Michael. It was an honor and a pleasure working with you too. And good luck to you and all of your future endeavors. If you've gotten value out of this or any of our podcasts, head on over to your favorite podcast player and rate and review the show. It will mean the world to us and it helps others find the show. Until next week, go out there, have an amazing week, have an amazing weekend, and we'll see you soon.

1:01:21Yeah, I remember you. You were the bad boy. You threw your life away. Like you were just a toy. And you solved the world. You're a song of a tragedy. Cause you had your taste of black on the yesterday. Yeah, but I remember you. Oh yeah, I remember you You remember me

1:01:58Next up is a little song from CarMax about selling a car your way. You wanna sell those wheels? You wanna get a CarMax instant offer? So fast. Wanna take a sec to think about it? Or like a month? Wanna keep tabs on that instant offer? With OfferWatch. Wanna have CarMax pick it up from your driveway? You wanna get it, touch it. You wanna do it all day. So, wanna drive? CarMax. Pickup not available everywhere. Restrictions and fee may apply.